DOCSLIB.ORG

Iron Horse Trail Feasibility Study and Master Plan I I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Santa Rita Road to the Dublin/Pleasanton BART Station Pleasanton, California January 17, 2011 prepared for East Bay Regional Park District 2950 Peralta Oaks Ct. P.O. Box 5381 Oakland, CA 94605 (510) 544-2602 City of Pleasanton 200 Old Bernal Avenue Pleasanton, CA 94566 (925) 931-5340 ACTC/ACTIA 1333 Broadway, Suite 300 Oakland, CA 94612 (510) 893-3347 prepared by Callander Associates Trail & Greenway Planners In conjunction with Fehr & Peers Biotic Resources Group TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY....................................................... 1 Purpose of the Study................................................ 1 Summary of Trail Alignment...................................... 1 Iron Horse Trail Background..................................... 2 PLANNING PROCESS............................................................ 3 Data Acquisition........................................................ 3 Site Investigation...................................................... 3 Agency Coordination................................................ 3 Opportunities and Constraints.................................. 4 Public Outreach........................................................18 PROJECT CONSIDERATIONS............................................ 19 Site Setting.............................................................. 19 Traffic Analysis........................................................ 20 Environmental Analysis........................................... 24 TRAIL ALIGNMENT ........................................................... 26 Preliminary Corridor Concept Plan.......................... 26 Park Connections.................................................... 34 Owens Plaza Park............................................... 34 Creekside Park.................................................... 34 Hacienda Linear Park.......................................... 35 Hacienda Business Park..................................... 35 Hacienda Transit Oriented Development (TOD)..35 Neighborhood Trail Alignment................................. 38 BART Station Alignment.......................................... 41 Street Crossings...................................................... 44 Owens Drive........................................................ 44 Hacienda Drive.................................................... 44 West Las Positas Blvd......................................... 44 Santa Rita Road/Stoneridge Drive...................... 44 IMPLEMENTATION............................................................ 50 Project Costs........................................................... 50 Funding................................................................... 50 Next Steps............................................................... 50 Acknowledgements................................................. 51 APPENDIX........................................................................... 52 Iron Horse Trail Feasibility Study and Master Plan I i EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PURPOSE OF THE STUDY This study examines the feasibility of closing the 1.6 mile gap of the Iron Horse Trail between the Dublin/Pleasanton BART station and Santa Rita Road in Pleasanton. Through site analysis, data and record compilation, public outreach, agency coordination, planning, and opportunities and constraints mapping the study analyzes alternatives for the trail alignment and potential impacts of the trail development, with the goal being identifying the most feasible alternative. An estimate of design, permitting, and construction costs was also included in the scope of work. Currently, nearly 28 miles of continuous trail from Concord to Pleasanton to the north of the proposed trail have been completed and 3.25 miles of trail have been completed to the south, extending from Santa Rita Road to the Livermore border. This feasibility study reviews the opportunities and challenges faced in constructing a link to the existing trail segments. Once constructed, the new trail will create over 31 miles of continuous trail and link the southern portion of Pleasanton to the Pleasanton BART station and the northern section of Iron Horse Trail. Summary OF TRAIL ALIGNMENT This 1.6 mile section of Iron Horse Trail crosses 5 streets, 2 creeks, 2 parks, and a number of housing developments. From north to south, the trail alignment passes through the Dublin/Pleasanton BART station, crosses Owens Drive and transects the Hacienda Business Park. Once the trail enters the business park it crosses Hacienda Drive, runs along the northern edge of the Sienna and Valencia at Hacienda housing developments, passes Owens Plaza Park and crosses Tassajara Creek on an existing bridge. It then passes through the northern portion of Creekside Park, crosses West Las Positas Boulevard, extends along the northern edge of the Springhouse Apartments property and then utilizes the existingIron maintenance Horse Trail road –along Feasibility the Arroyo Study Mocho canal. Utilizing theSanta existing Rita RdSanta to theRita Dublin/PleasantonRoad bridge it traverses BART the Station Arroyo Mocho Canal, crosses the Santa Rita Road/Stoneridge Drive intersection, and thenSite connects Orientation with the existing section of Iron Horse Trail. North Terminus of Archstone Hacienda Apts. Existing Trail Owens Plaza Park Interstate 580 Valencia at Hacienda Homes Dublin/Pleasanton BART Tassajara Creek West Las Positas Blvd. Springhouse Apts. Las Positas Gardens S an ta Ri ta e R v o d. i T r a h c D s s o a a d j M a n o e r e a y 0 iv ci 8 r C ro -5 D a I r s H e Ar en e w k O W. Las Positas Blvd. Owens Dr. Creekside Park Hacienda Stoneridge Business Park Business Park. Arroyo Mocho Canal Hacienda Dr. Zone 7 – Water District Property South Terminus of Existing Trail Trail Corridor Figure 1 Iron Horse Trail Feasibility Study and Master Plan I 1 TOWN & CONTINUED ON REVERSE SYCAMORE COUNTRY BLACKHAWK SYCAMORE C VALLEY VALLEY RD. W. AM BLACKHAWK VALLEY ROAD IN REGIONAL N DR. PARK & O NGTO RIDE REMI SYCAMORE OPEN CAMINO EVERETT TA SPACE IRON SS AJ G AR R A COUNTRY F.S. #31 DR. DANVILLE TOWN BROOKSD E I E COUNTRY E SVC. CENTER N .43 B R SYCAMORE SAN O P.O. LAS O VALLEY K PARK TRAMPAS PARAISO DR. DR. CLUB HORSE HOLBROOK DR. CLUB OSAGE RAMON STATION F.S. #35 .45 PARK REGIONAL D R WILDERNESS . RAMON U.C. BERKELEY DR. MUSUEM BLACKHAWK CAPITAN WOOD RANCH DR. AUTO V EL MUSEUM A EXECUTIVE SUMMARY L L REGIONAL CAMINO TASSAJA E DR. R Y L A A W R . E R N D C E CH N B A L OK R V RO DANVILLE NORTHVIEW CT. D. .49 NB REE SYCAMORE A G R A VALLEY J CIR. A GS S SPRIN REGIONAL S LAS OPEN TA N I A TRAMPAS T SPACE N P DIABLO U E O ROAD REGIONAL F VISTA T TRAIL E CANYON EL CROW CANYO PARK WILDERNESS R N S C JOAQUIN R R E A S N C T C DANVILLE A D LAND BANK H P A SOUTH DR. I O T R R PARK GOLDEN NOT OPEN D A .99 VIEW N . N O SCHOOL NY TO THE PUBLIC CLUB D A COUNTRY PARK R C . (PRIVATE) HOOPER DR. TO LAS TRAMPAS REGIONAL DR. OW WILDERNESS STAGING O R M 680 C E B G O A L Hiker, Horse, Bike Paved Trail D L F.S. #36 I .20 O N CAMINO R U IRON HORSE TRAIL BACKGROUND G D G E . H Proposed Hiker, Horse, Bike Paved Trail R E RECYCLING CENTER FOSTORIA WAY R C T A P.O. Y Hiker, Horse, Bike Unpaved Trail N A Y ROAD . L O D C N O R S Hiker, Horse Unpaved Trail .42 T . A R N O Y A C CITY HALL Hiker Unpaved Trail D MILL D SAN RAMON CREEK O W O O CANYON HOLLOW R CENTER FOR REGIONAL W C Other Agency Trail R HIGHER ED. ROAD MEDICAL Since the first segment was developed in 1986, the Iron Horse Trail has E LD DE E CENTER E DR. O BLVD. R WOOD D BART Track U. OF S.F. ROAD SAN RAMON CANYON .12 RAMON .35 Mileage Between Points CANYON LAKES played a critical role in connecting the various communities and cities OW IN ORDER TO REDUCE OR PREVENT THE RISK OF CR F.S.#38 NORRIS Regional Parks Commercial/Shopping SERIOUS HEAD INJURY OR DEATH, STATE LAW CROW REQUIRESTHAT ALL BICYCLISTS UNDER AGE 18 CANYON ROAD GARDENS Parking WEAR AN APPROVED HELMET WHILE RIDING ON City Parks; EBMUD TRAILS AND ROADWAYS.THE DISTRICT ALSO BISHOP of the Diablo and San Ramon Valleys together. It’s one of the largest & Y. SAN STRONGLY RECOMMENDS THAT ALL EQUESTRIANS INTERMODAL W Drinking Water AND BICYCLISTS WEAR HELMETS AT ALL TIMES. H TRANSIT RAMON TWIN RS CREEKS MA FACILITY F.S. #34 SCHOOL Restroom F.S. = Fire Station EXECUTIVE PKW GOLF PARK .58 CENTRAL SCALE oldest multi-use trails in the Bay Area and lies within the former Southern DR. PARK COMM. ? Information Panel P.O.= Post Office DRIVE CENTER 0 1/4 1/2 3/4 1 Mile W School COURSE Trail Mileages Courtesy Hal McDonald, EBRPD Volunteer LIBRARY View Point Pacific Railroad (SPR) right-of-way; which was abandoned in 1977. SUNSET AD Base map courtesy California State Automobile Association DR. RO N IRON YO ROAD CAN BOLLINGER SAN RAMON .82 When the SPR right-of-way was abandoned by the railroad, several trail N YO B N R A O C MORG R. A A D D N M OT OO advocacy groups, including the Southern Pacific Right of Way Study C AS RK R N BISHOP ORRIS MONTEVIDEO R. SCHOOL SAN INVERNESS PA D PARK DR RANCH T IVE CO South A S R Committee and Right of Way Trail Advocates, lobbied for preservation A M D A J R O A DR. IV E N A REGIONAL E D G S I HORSE O S EV S RAMON NT A ATHAN O T M of the corridor for trail purposes. Contra Costa and Alameda Counties DOWNS DR. 1.03 ? OPEN ALCOSTA SAN RAMON initiated the process of acquiring the right-of-way for use as a transit OLYMPIC POOL CONTRA COSTA COUNTY & TENNIS CTS. San SPACE O D N I A ESTERO DR. V M O A ALAMEDA COUNTY B DEL MAR DR. N R C A O and utility corridor. Today the two counties own the rights for the entire A D M VALLEY O ROAD OR CAMP CONTRA COSTA COUNTY DR. ALAMEDA corridor COUNTY from Suisun Bay to Livermore. DISNEY BLVD. SCHOOL VALLEY PARK REGIONAL DR. OLD T A INE R S P A S N D A BOONE A J ACRES Ramon C O A H R R A BLVD. .84 GOLF OLD PARKS T Once Alameda and Contra Costa Counties had secured the land for A RANCH SS SAN COURSE PARK A PARK & V JA Creek RAMON GARDENS IS R T A A CR ROYAL SENIOR CENTER M EE VISTA O K N use as a future transit corridor, they worked with the East Bay Regional R S T E E B T G A I R D O G O F.S.
Recommended publications
  • 2005 Pleasanton Plan 2025

    2005 Pleasanton Plan 2025

    2005 Pleasanton Plan 2025 7. CONSERVATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT Table of Contents page page BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE.................................................. 7-1 Tables SUSTAINABILITY ........................................................................ 7-1 Table 7-1 Potential Wildlife Species of Concern in the RESOURCE CONSERVATION ..................................................... 7-2 Planning Area ........................................................... 7-3 Animal Life.......................................................................... 7-2 Table 7-2 Potential Rare, Threatened, or Endangered Plants Plant Life............................................................................. 7-4 in the Planning Area .................................................. 7-6 Soil Resources ..................................................................... 7-9 Table 7-3 Historic Neighborhoods and Structures ..................... 7-15 Sand and Gravel............................................................... 7-10 Cultural Resources............................................................. 7-11 Figures OPEN SPACE LANDS............................................................... 7-18 Figure 7-1 Generalized Land Cover, 2005 .................................. 7-5 Recreational Open Space................................................... 7-18 Figure 7-2 Aggregate Resources and Reclamation ...................... 7-12 Water Management, Habitat, and Recreation...................... 7-24 Figure 7-3 Historic Neighborhoods
  • (Oncorhynchus Mykiss) in Streams of the San Francisco Estuary, California

    (Oncorhynchus Mykiss) in Streams of the San Francisco Estuary, California

    Historical Distribution and Current Status of Steelhead/Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in Streams of the San Francisco Estuary, California Robert A. Leidy, Environmental Protection Agency, San Francisco, CA Gordon S. Becker, Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration, Oakland, CA Brett N. Harvey, John Muir Institute of the Environment, University of California, Davis, CA This report should be cited as: Leidy, R.A., G.S. Becker, B.N. Harvey. 2005. Historical distribution and current status of steelhead/rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in streams of the San Francisco Estuary, California. Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration, Oakland, CA. Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration TABLE OF CONTENTS Forward p. 3 Introduction p. 5 Methods p. 7 Determining Historical Distribution and Current Status; Information Presented in the Report; Table Headings and Terms Defined; Mapping Methods Contra Costa County p. 13 Marsh Creek Watershed; Mt. Diablo Creek Watershed; Walnut Creek Watershed; Rodeo Creek Watershed; Refugio Creek Watershed; Pinole Creek Watershed; Garrity Creek Watershed; San Pablo Creek Watershed; Wildcat Creek Watershed; Cerrito Creek Watershed Contra Costa County Maps: Historical Status, Current Status p. 39 Alameda County p. 45 Codornices Creek Watershed; Strawberry Creek Watershed; Temescal Creek Watershed; Glen Echo Creek Watershed; Sausal Creek Watershed; Peralta Creek Watershed; Lion Creek Watershed; Arroyo Viejo Watershed; San Leandro Creek Watershed; San Lorenzo Creek Watershed; Alameda Creek Watershed; Laguna Creek (Arroyo de la Laguna) Watershed Alameda County Maps: Historical Status, Current Status p. 91 Santa Clara County p. 97 Coyote Creek Watershed; Guadalupe River Watershed; San Tomas Aquino Creek/Saratoga Creek Watershed; Calabazas Creek Watershed; Stevens Creek Watershed; Permanente Creek Watershed; Adobe Creek Watershed; Matadero Creek/Barron Creek Watershed Santa Clara County Maps: Historical Status, Current Status p.
  • Appendix A: Notice of Preparation and Responses

    Appendix A: Notice of Preparation and Responses

    City of Pleasanton – East Pleasanton Specific Plan Project Draft EIR Appendix A: Notice of Preparation and Responses FirstCarbon Solutions H:\Client (PN-JN)\4230\42300001\EIR\4 - Draft EIR\42300001 Sec 99-00 Appendix Dividers.doc City of Pleasanton – East Pleasanton Specific Plan Project Draft EIR A.1 - Notice of Preparation FirstCarbon Solutions H:\Client (PN-JN)\4230\42300001\EIR\4 - Draft EIR\42300001 Sec 99-00 Appendix Dividers.doc City of Pleasanton Notice of Preparation and Scoping Meeting Environmental Impact Report for the East Pleasanton Specific Plan Date: Thursday, October 24, 2013 To: Public Agencies and Interested Parties From: Janice Stern, Planning Manager, City of Pleasanton Subject: Notice of Preparation and Notice of Scoping Meeting for an Environmental Impact Report for the East Pleasanton Specific Plan (P13‐1858) The City of Pleasanton will be the Lead Agency and will prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the project identified below. The project description, location, and probable environmental effects of the East Pleasanton Specific Plan are described in the attached materials. The City of Pleasanton is soliciting comments regarding the scope and content of the environmental information from public agencies and private organizations and individuals. Note that public agencies may need to use the Environmental Impact Report when considering permitting or other approvals. Because of time limits mandated by state law, your response must be sent at the earliest possible date but not later than 30 days after receipt of this notice. Please provide your written response to the address shown below by Monday, November 25, 2013. We will need the contact name and information of you or a person in your agency or organization.
  • Power Point Presentation

    Power Point Presentation

    Friends of the Arroyos A “tributary” of the Alameda Creek Alliance Arroyo Mocho * Arroyo Las Positas * Arroyo Seco * Arroyo del Valle * Arroyo de la Laguna Altamont Creek * Cayateno Creek * Cottonwood Creek * Cottinger Creek * Tassajara Creek * Dry Creek * Mission Creek * Sycamore Creek * Vallecitos Creek MISSION ØRestore the historical steelhead trout migration through the Arroyos via Alameda Creek to the SF Bay ØPromote stream restoration, cleanups, and awareness Steelhead Trout Background Information ØSteelhead are rainbow trout that migrate to the ocean from breeding sites in cool water streams. ØSteelhead (up to 30”) have been caught in the Arroyos here up until the 1960s. ØThey currently do not migrate through the Arroyos because of - barriers in lower Alameda Creek and the Arroyos - inadequate stream flows allowed by Zone 7 Water Agency. ØBiologists have determined that steelhead could spawn in the upper gorge of Arroyo Mocho where native trout already live ØSmolts (juveniles) can survive in existing deep spring-fed pools in the Mocho gorge during our hot summers ØSmolts (1-2 yrs old) migrate downstream and adults upstream to spawn and back during the high flows around storm events. Adults can travel 1 mile/hour! Historical evidence of migration Steelhead caught in Alameda Creek in 1961 Livermore Herald: April 9, 1910 A 30” trout must be a steelhead! How did the steelhead migrate to the Bay? Spawning Habitat in Arroyo Mocho Gorge Map from pg. 24 of “An Assessment of the Potential for Restoring a Viable Steelhead Trout Population in the Alameda Creek Watershed” Prepared for the Alameda Creek Fisheries Restoration Workgroup, Feb.
  • Full Agenda Packet

    Full Agenda Packet

    LIVERMORE AMADOR VALLEY TRANSIT AUTHORITY 1362 Rutan Court, Suite 100 Livermore, CA 94551 PROJECTS and SERVICES COMMITTEE MEETING / COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE COMMITTEE MEMBERS DAVID HAUBERT – CHAIR JEAN JOSEY – VICE CHAIR KARLA BROWN BOB WOERNER Agenda Questions: Please call the Executive Director at (925) 455-7564 or send an email to [email protected] Documents received after publication of the Agenda and considered by the P&S Committee in its deliberation will be available for inspection only via electronic document transfer, due to the COVID-19 outbreak. See the COVID-19 provisions outlined below. Please call or email the Executive Director during normal business hours if you require access to any such documents. TELECONFERENCE MAY 24, 2021 – 4:00 PM CORONAVIRUS DISEASE (COVID-19) ADVISORY AND MEETING PROCEDURE On June 5, 2020 (updated June 18, 2020), the Health Officer of Alameda County issued an Order that will continue to be in effect until it is rescinded, superseded, or amended in writing by the Health Officer. The Order directed that all individuals living in the county to shelter at their place of residence except that they may leave to provide or receive certain essential services or engage in certain essential activities and work for essential businesses and governmental services. Under the Governor’s Executive Order N-29-20, this meeting may utilize teleconferencing. As a precaution to protect the health and safety of staff, officials, and the general public. Councilmembers will not be physically in attendance, but will be available via video conference. The administrative office of Livermore Amador Valley Transit Authority (LAVTA) is currently closed to the public and will remain closed for the duration of the Project & Services (P&S) Committee meeting.
  • 4225 Hacienda Drive Pleasanton | California

    4225 Hacienda Drive Pleasanton | California

    AVAILABLE HACIENDA BUSINESS PARK JULY 2018 4225 HACIENDA DRIVE PLEASANTON | CALIFORNIA ±394,000 SF REGIONAL HEADQUARTERS DISTRIBUTION SPACE VIEW THE VIDEO 30 MINUTES TO PORT OF OAKLAND. 20 MILES TO CENTRAL VALLEY. Please do not GREIG F. LAGOMARSINO, SIOR MICHAEL K. LLOYD, SIOR disturb occupant. EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT Please call for details +1 510 433 5809 +1 925 227 6208 [email protected] [email protected] or to arrange a CA License No. 01063817 CA License No. 00924182 property tour. JOHN S. STEINBUCH, SIOR NICK OUSMAN EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT VICE PRESIDENT CONTACT US CONTACT +1 925 227 6212 +1 510 433 5820 [email protected] [email protected] CA License No. 00687107 CA License No. 01908981 4225 Hacienda Drive | Pleasanton, CA Infill San Francisco Bay Area Location Located in the heart of the Bay Area, the Hacienda Business Park is the Tri-Valley’s premier warehouse distribution and regional headquarters facility. The property provides immediate access to all major highways and is strategically located in close proximity to the Central Valley submarkets and the East Bay/Peninsula submarkets. POTENTIALEXCESS BUILDING LAND FOR EXPANSION HACIENDA DRIVE GIBRALTAR DRIVE Please do not disturb occupant. Please call for details or to Building Highlights arrange a property tour. • ±394,000 square foot • T-8 motion sensor lighting warehouse/distribution space • Secured skylights throughout • ±22.38 acre parcel which allows • Forklift charging station and for potential expansion exhaust
  • Assessment of the Potential for Restoring a Viable Steelhead Trout Population in the Alameda Creek Watershed

    Assessment of the Potential for Restoring a Viable Steelhead Trout Population in the Alameda Creek Watershed

    I 580 Si San Francisco Bay Stonybrook Cr. n ba d C r Arroyo Mocho Vallecitos Cr. Canyon San Antonio Reservoir Lake Del Valle I 680 Pirate Cr. I 880 Welch Cr. Alameda Diversion Valpe Cr. Tunnel Calaveras Reservoir Plate 1 - Alameda Creek Watershed Alameda Creek Watershed An Assessment of the Potential for Restoring a Viable Steelhead Trout Population in the Alameda Creek Watershed prepared for the Alameda Creek Fisheries Restoration Workgroup by Andrew J. Gunther Jeffrey Hagar Paul Salop Applied Marine Sciences, Inc. 4749 Bennett Dr., Suite L Livermore, CA 94550 www.amarine.com Hagar Environmental Science 6523 Claremont Ave, Suite B Richmond, CA 94805 February 7, 2000 Alameda Creek Fisheries Restoration Workgroup 2/7/00 Alameda Creek Fisheries Restoration Workgroup 2/7/00 Table of Contents Table of Contents ........................................................................................................ ii Acknowledgements ...................................................................................................iii Executive Summary.................................................................................................... 1 I. Introduction ................................................................................................................ 5 A. Background......................................................................................................... 5 B. Decision Process for preparation of this report .................................................. 7 II. The Alameda Creek Watershed .............................................................................
  • Tri-Valley Hub Network Integration Study Final Report

    Tri-Valley Hub Network Integration Study Final Report

    Tri-Valley Hub Network Integration Study Final Report May 20, 2021 ES-1 Final Report Tri-Valley Hub Network Integration Study Tri-Valley Hub Network Integration Study Final Report Prepared by Livermore Amador Valley Transit Authority (LAVTA) May 20, 2021 Executive Summary The 2018 California State Rail Plan envisions a network of high-speed, intercity corridor, and commuter trains integrated with local transit, providing nearly seamless connections for riders seeking to reach all parts of the state. In corridors where no trains operate, the Rail Plan calls for express buses using the existing highway systems to provide access to the state’s rail system. The Rail Plan identified the I-680 corridor between the Tri-Valley area (i.e. Dublin, Pleasanton, and Livermore) and Suisun City as one such corridor, where express buses could link a Tri-Valley Transit Hub with the Suisun-Fairfield Amtrak Station, a stop for the Capitol Corridor trains. This Tri-Valley Hub Network Integration Study is an effort to define what such express bus service would be: its route, stops, connections with corridor and commuter trains, as well as its likely ridership, revenue, and costs for implementation. The study investigates the BART Dublin/Pleasanton BART station as a candidate for the Tri-Valley Transit Hub, along with potential improvements that could make the facility easier, safer, and more comfortable for riders to use. The study also explores options to better connect northern San Joaquin County communities with the Tri-Valley Hub. The distance between the Suisun Amtrak Station and the Dublin/Pleasanton BART Station is 53 miles, inclusive of a stop at the Martinez Amtrak Station.
  • Redline Version

    Redline Version

    Pleasanton, California DESIGN GUIDELINES JUNE 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS CONTACT INFORMATION ................................................................................. 11 1.0 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................13 Figure 1-1: Hacienda Illustrative Plan................................................14 1.1 Hacienda Overview ..................................................................... 15 A. Introduction .................................................................... 15 Figure 1-2: Hacienda Vicinity ..................................................... 15 B. Development Plan .............................................................. 15 C. Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions............................... 16 D. Design Guidelines .............................................................. 16 1.2 General Hacienda Concept Description .................................................... 18 Figure 1-3: TOD and Housing Sites ................................................ 19 1.3 Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Concept Description ................................... 20 A. Purpose ....................................................................... 20 Figure 1-4: Hacienda TOD Concept ............................................... 21 B. Vision Statement................................................................ 21 C. Core PUD Regulations........................................................... 22 1.4 Residential Housing Site Development
  • Livermore Valley Groundwater Basin Bulletin 118

    Livermore Valley Groundwater Basin Bulletin 118

    San Francisco Hydrologic Region California’s Groundwater Livermore Valley Groundwater Basin Bulletin 118 Livermore Valley Groundwater Basin • Groundwater Basin Number: 2-10 • Counties: Alameda and Contra Costa • Surface Area: 69,600 acres (109 square miles) Basin Boundaries and Hydrology The Livermore Valley lies about 40 miles east of San Francisco and 30 miles southwest of Stockton within a structural trough of the Diablo Range. The groundwater basin extends from the Pleasonton Ridge east to the Altamont Hills (about 14 miles) and from the Livermore Upland north to the Orinda Upland (about 3 miles). Surface drainage features include Arroyo Valle, Arroyo Mocho, and Arroyo las Positas as principal streams, with Alamo Creek, South San Ramon Creek, and Tassajara Creek as minor streams. All streams converge on the west side of the basin to form Arroyo de la Laguna, which flows south and joins Alameda Creek in Sunol Valley. Some geologic structures restrict the lateral movement of groundwater, but the general groundwater gradient is to the west, then south towards Arroyo de la Laguna. Elevations within the basin range from about 600 ft in the east, near the Altamont Hills, to about 280 ft in the southwest, where Arroyo de la Laguna flows into Sunol Groundwater Basin. Average annual precipitation ranges from 16 inches on the valley floor to more than 20 inches along the southeast and northwest basin margins. Hydrogeologic Information Water Bearing Formations The entire floor of Livermore Valley and portions of the upland areas on all sides of the valley overly groundwater-bearing materials. The materials are continental deposits from alluvial fans, outwash plains, and lakes.
  • ALAMEDA COUNTYWIDE CLEAN WATER PROGRAM STORM WATER RESOURCE PLAN January 2019

    ALAMEDA COUNTYWIDE CLEAN WATER PROGRAM STORM WATER RESOURCE PLAN January 2019

    ALAMEDA COUNTYWIDE CLEAN WATER PROGRAM STORM WATER MEMBER AGENCIES: RESOURCE PLAN Alameda Albany Berkeley Dublin Emeryville Fremont Hayward Livermore Newark Oakland Piedmont Pleasanton San Leandro Union City County of Alameda Alameda County Flood January 2019 Control and Water Conservation District Zone 7 Water Agency Table of Contents Table of Contents ..................................................................................................................... 2 1. Introduction ................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Purpose of the Plan .................................................................................................... 5 1.2 Alameda County’s Watersheds: Approach and Characterization ................................ 5 1.3 Water Quality Issues And Regulatory Requirements .................................................. 5 1.4 Organization of the SWRP .......................................................................................... 6 2. Coordination and Collaboration ................................................................... 8 2.1 Entities Involved in Plan Development ........................................................................ 8 2.2 Coordination of Cooperating Entities and Stakeholders .............................................. 8 2.3 Relationship with Existing Planning Documents .......................................................... 8 2.3.1 San Francisco Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Management Plan ................
  • The Viticultural Districts of the Livermore Valley AVA

    The Viticultural Districts of the Livermore Valley AVA

    The Viticultural Districts of the Livermore Valley AVA by Patrick L Shabram Copyright ©2018, 2019 Prepared by Patrick L Shabram for the Livermore Valley Winegrowers Association ALL RIGHTS RESERVED The Viticultural Districts of the Livermore Valley AVA Summary The Livermore Valley AVA is diverse in topography, soil, and as a result of Pacific airflow into the region, climate. The Livermore Valley Winegrowers Association has commissioned a soils report and a climate report to better understand this diversity. Utilizing the results of the climate and soils reports, this report outlines twelve viticultural districts within the Livermore Valley AVA. Background The Livermore Valley AVA (27 CFR Part 9 §9.46) was created in 1982 and amended in 2006 to recognize the unique viticulture of the inland East Bay area of the San Francisco Bay Area. The AVA occupies sections of the Diablo Range in southern Contra Costa and eastern Alameda counties, including the Amador, Livermore, and San Ramon valleys (often referred to as the Tri-Valley area). The Diablo Range is a subset of the greater Coastal Ranges. The AVA is characterized by a combination of diverse topography and transitional climate, which creates diverse growing conditions within the AVA. Despite its inland location, which is not adjacent to any bodies of water, the climate of the Livermore Valley AVA is greatly influenced by Pacific airflow that moderates temperatures relative to warmer inland locations to the east. This airflow enters the AVA in several locations, complicating the temperature patterns in the AVA. Further complicating the climate is elevation, which ranges from approximately 160 feet to 3,848 feet in the area.