SG.1070 NEW Layout 2

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

SG.1070 NEW Layout 2 September 2002 T G R R O A W smart growth M T AMERICA S H V OLUME 1 IS SUE 2 Business Councils Promote SMART GROWTH FOR A STRONG ECONOMY Smart Growth as BY DON CHEN Smart Business Four case studies: he growth beat’s been a tough gig lately, services for homeless families. David Goldberg Atlanta, Denver, Chicago, Silicon Valley especially with shrunken stock values, profiles SVMG and three other business-led smart T BY DAVID GOLDBERG shriveled government budgets, and a diminished growth initiatives in his article. transportation trust fund weighing heavily on peo- Such business leadership reflects the enlight- ou could almost see it, the moment the light ples’ minds. But we’re bullish on smart growth. In ened outlook adopted by many in the real estate Y bulb went on for business leaders in metro fact, it embodies some of the best ideas for bring- industry. One leading industry report, Emerging Atlanta. It was early 1998, roughly 18 months ing our stalled economy back to life. Trends in Real Estate Development, sized up the after the city had played host to the world, but For starters, even in recession, growing num- post-September 11th landscape and cautioned already Atlanta was losing its Olympic luster. bers of business leaders are pushing for smart investors against backing sprawl development, Suddenly, business travelers from the economic growth reforms, focusing on affordable housing, contending that “... properties in better-planned, powerhouse of the South were hearing associates workforce development, environmental protec- growth-constrained markets hold value better in from other locales referring to their home town tion, and easing traffic. For example, the Silicon downmarkets and appreciate more in upcycles.” as the “L.A. of the South” or “poster child for Valley Manufacturing Group (SVMG) has been a Projections of consumer demand indicate a suburban sprawl”. strong supporter of affordable housing efforts in sharply growing preference for compact, walka- The sudden, negative scrutiny arrived on the California’s Santa Clara County. As of March, they ble neighborhoods over the next decade, largely heels of Atlanta’s collision with the national Clean had endorsed plans to build over 31,000 for-sale because of baby boomer homebuyers who will Air Act. Because the region’s road-heavy trans- and rental homes that are located in relatively dominate the real estate market. According to a portation plans failed to stay within the emissions compact, walkable and transit-rich neighbor- recent University of Southern California study limits set by the state’s own plan for cleaning up hoods, and are primarily intended for lower-wage sponsored by the Fannie Mae Foundation and smog, metro Atlanta was barred by law from workers. They also have spearheaded efforts to Bank of America, between 31 and 54 percent of spending federal money to expand road capacity in create a private-public affordable housing trust older Americans will demand New Urban-style the 13 counties suffering from bad summertime air. fund, increased public transit investment, and neighborhoods in the 2000s, up substantially from Sam Williams, the president of the Metro 15 percent in the 1990s. Atlanta Chamber of Commerce, called it a “train Public officials are turning to smart growth as wreck”. He wasn’t alone in his concern. With the well, especially fiscally responsible infrastructure growth machine threatening to grind to a halt, policies that support investment in existing com- even the region’s most ardent cheerleaders began munities over subsidizing new development. This to wonder whether Atlanta’s famous growth-at- is the hallmark of many smart growth policies, as any-cost approach was coming at too high a price. exemplified by Maryland’s Priority Funding Areas Since that time, the issues around managing program, New Jersey’s Fix-It-First transportation Atlanta’s growth — whether transportation, policy and countless local measures requiring water quality and supply, air pollution or work- adequate public facilities. As pre-recession projec- force housing — have occupied the very top of tions of surpluses give way to budget cuts, cities the business leadership’s agenda. Those leaders’ are looking for more efficient ways to meet cur- advocacy for smart growth has led to the creation rent demands, accommodate new growth and of a regional transit agency with some land use, as expand their tax base without having to build well the establishment of a new structure for expensive new infrastructure or raise taxes. In planning and managing north Georgia’s water isis stillstill relevantrelevant Smart growth resources. during an “economic downturn.” CONTINUED ON PAGE 6> CONTINUED ON PAGE 4> I N T HIS I SSUE Labor Page 3 Field Notes Page 7 Brain Food Page 11 Smart Tools Page 9 Unions locally and nationally Smart Growth news from around “Solving Sprawl” lauds smart Community banks turn your deposits recognize that sprawl harms union the country. What’s happening in development, leaves hyperbole into revitalized neighborhoods. members. your back yard? at the door. 1 Smart Growth is Becoming We finished the day by mapping the voting records of state legislators and members of SMART GROWTH PRIORITIES ADVANCE: THE FARM BILL, HOUSING AND MORE Congress, based on non-partisan ratings by the a AFL-CIO Committee on Political Education. The Union Thing. maps clearly show that elected officials from BY KATE BICKNELL Chicago and its inner-ring suburbs to the south BY GREG LEROY and southwest vote far more often for working very five years or so, Congress reauthorizes a farm bill that determines America has joined the Alliance for a New Transportation Charter, a broad- families than those everywhere else. how billions of dollars will be spent on commodities (primarily grains E based coalition organized by the Surface Transportation Policy Project Soon after the Chicago conference, the CFL and cotton), conservation, nutrition assistance (such as food stamps), rural ew union leaders are aware of sprawl The sessions pointed out how workers in sev- (STPP) that is working to make transportation investments serve communi- executive board authorized Turner to represent development, forestry and other programs that profoundly affect the pattern eral industries are affected by Chicago’s sprawl: ties better. Launched in December, 2001 with over 300 endorsements, the by its name. But unions locally and the federation’s interests on smart growth. of land use in the United States. F New Transportation Charter recognizes that transportation is a tool for HOSPITALITY: Good Jobs First mapped Together with the Contra Costa County Central Federal farm subsidies reach only about 40 percent of farms. While farm- nationally are beginning to recognize that achieving better outcomes in public health, affordable housing, access to unionized hotels and hotel jobs. The Hotel Labor Council and the Cleveland Federation of land production has more than doubled over the past fifty years, the number jobs, energy efficiency and livability. In addition to this effort, Smart Growth because sprawl harms cities, it also harms Employees and Restaurant Employees Labor, Chicago submitted a smart growth resolu- of farms has declined by more than two-thirds. Economic challenges, cou- America’s coalition is developing a number of proposals to better integrate union members. International Union (HERE) has only three con- tion that was adopted at the national AFL-CIO’s pled with growing development pressures, have resulted in the loss of much transportation and land use. tracts outside of centrally located Cook County. December 2001 convention. Since then, similarly- of our highest quality farmland to urban sprawl. (see the American Farmland Anti-sprawl resolutions have recently been Meanwhile, the Bush Administration and Congress are working to devel- This is a typical pattern for HERE, which has suf- worded resolutions have been passed by the Trust’s research at http://farmland.org.) adopted by the national AFL-CIO, by one of its op their proposals for the bill’s reauthorization. The Administration’s pro- fered due to the growth of “edge cities” and Pennsylvania AFL-CIO and by the national con- Efforts to preserve farmland and restore forests and wetlands at the urban largest affiliates, and by a state labor federation. posal is likely to be sent to Congress for consideration in January of 2003, their companion hotels. vention of the 1.4 million-member American fringe rely heavily on federal support, which has been woefully underfunded. with final passage expected next fall. One union — the 1.4 million-member United HEALTH CARE: A map of hospital closures Federation of State, County and Municipal In fiscal 2001, only 16 percent of farmers’ requests from USDA conservation For more information on the Alliance for the New Transportation Charter: www.antc.net; on the Food and Commercial Workers Union (UFCW) since 1972 shows they are completely concen- Employees (AFSCME), one of the AFL-CIO’s programs were granted. reauthorization of TEA-21: www.antc.net and www.tea3.org — knows the sprawl issue because of its long trated in Chicago and in immediately-adjacent most politically active unions. Many legislators had hoped this year’s bill would result in a more equitable antagonism with virulently anti-union Wal-Mart. Planning parts of Cook County. Seven of the 27 closed In popular communications terms, sprawl is distribution of farming assistance and significantly increased conservation And a few unions that represent public transit Senate bill 975, also known as the Community Character Act, would facilities were unionized, affecting four different both “hard” (i.e., abstract) and “cool” (i.e., not funding. One House version would have tripled funds for agricultural conser- workers, especially the Amalgamated Transit authorize $25 million per year for five years to assist states in reforming unions. Both health care jobs and access to care easily approached).
Recommended publications
  • Smart Growth and Economic Success: Benefits for Real Estate Developers, Investors, Businesses, and Local Governments
    United States December 2012 Environmental Protection Agency www.epa.gov/smartgrowth SMART GROWTH AND ECONOMIC SUCCESS: BENEFITS FOR REAL ESTATE DEVELOPERS, INVESTORS, BUSINESSES, AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS Office of Sustainable Communities Smart Growth Program (Distributed at 1/14/13 Sustainable Thurston Task Force meeting) Acknowledgments This report was prepared by the EPA’s Office of Sustainable Communities with the assistance of Renaissance Planning Group under contract number EP-W-11-009/010/11. Principal Staff Contacts: Melissa Kramer and Lee Sobel Mention of trade names, products, or services does not convey official EPA approval, endorsement, or recommendation. Cover photos (left to right, top to bottom): Barracks Row in Washington, D.C., courtesy of Lee Sobel; TRAX light rail in Sandy, Utah, courtesy of Melissa Kramer; Mission Creek Senior Community in San Francisco, California, courtesy of Alan Karchmer and Mercy Housing Inc. (Distributed at 1/14/13 Sustainable Thurston Task Force meeting) Table of Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................................ i I. Economic Advantages of Smart Growth Strategies .............................................................................. 1 II. Economic Advantages of Compact Development ................................................................................. 4 A. Higher Revenue Generation per Acre of Land .................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Smart Growth Guide
    LOCAL GOVERNMENT CLIMATE AND ENERGY STRATEGY SERIES Smart Growth A Guide to Developing and Implementing Greenhouse Gas Reductions Programs Community Planning and Design U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 2011 EPA’s Local Government Climate and Energy Strategy Series The Local Government Climate and Energy Strategy Series provides a comprehensive, straightforward overview of green- house gas (GHG) emissions reduction strategies for local governments. Topics include energy efficiency, transportation, community planning and design, solid waste and materials management, and renewable energy. City, county, territorial, tribal, and regional government staff, and elected officials can use these guides to plan, implement, and evaluate their climate change mitigation and energy projects. Each guide provides an overview of project benefits, policy mechanisms, investments, key stakeholders, and other imple- mentation considerations. Examples and case studies highlighting achievable results from programs implemented in communities across the United States are incorporated throughout the guides. While each guide stands on its own, the entire series contains many interrelated strategies that can be combined to create comprehensive, cost-effective programs that generate multiple benefits. For example, efforts to improve energy efficiency can be combined with transportation and community planning programs to reduce GHG emissions, decrease energy and transportation costs, improve air quality and public health, and enhance quality of life. LOCAL GOVERNMENT
    [Show full text]
  • Smart Growth Audits
    Jerry Weitz, AICP, received his doctorate in urban studies from Portland State University and a master’s degree in city planning from the Georgia Institute of Technology. Weitz is author of Sprawl Busting: State Programs to Guide Growth (Chicago: Planners Press, 1999) and the User Manual for the Growing Smart Legislative Guidebook (Chicago: American Planning Association, 2002). He is president-elect of the Georgia Chapter of APA and heads his own planning and development consulting firm, Jerry Weitz & Associates, Inc., in Alpharetta, Georgia. He was employed formerly by Oregon’s Transportation and Growth Management Program Leora Susan Waldner is a doctoral candidate in the Department of City and Regional Planning at the University of California, Berkeley, and a planner with Jerry Weitz & Associates, Inc. Her work has included research on suburban revitalization strategies, drafting local land-use ordinances, and preparing smart growth tool descriptions. She holds masters degrees in city and re- gional planning and landscape architecture from the University of California at Berkeley and received her B.A. in urban studies from the University of California at San Diego. There are three entities acknowledged here for their funding support for work leading to this PAS Report: the Atlanta Regional Commission (ARC), the Georgia Department of Community Affairs (DCA), and the Regional Business Coalition of Metropolitan Atlanta, Inc.(RBC). As a part of its Community Choices program and in connection with its lead- ership role in the Georgia Quality Growth Partnership, the ARC in 2001 hired Jordan, Jones & Goulding (JJG) to prepare tool descriptions for its Quality Growth Toolkit. One of these work products, prepared by Jerry Weitz & As- sociates, Inc., under subcontract with JJG, focused on a smart growth audit.
    [Show full text]
  • A Healthy Design for Madison County: Primer for Smart Growth
    M ADISON COUNTY A Healthy Design for Madison County: Primer for Smart Growth Developed through a partnership with: Madison County Planning Department and Madison County Public Health Department September 2011 Community Economic Development Committee Members: Eileen Augustyn Sue Berger Christine Coe Theresa Davis Eric Faisst Jamie Hart Scott Ingmire Richard Mitchell Joan Nicholson How do the specific characteristics of our commu- Cassie Rose Joe Wicks nity affect our quality of life? What steps can we in- Virginia Zombek tentionally take to ensure welcoming, safe, efficient, healthy and accessible communities while maintain- ing our agricultural, cultural and historic heritage? Can we embrace progress and still retain a place of natural beauty where families and individuals thrive? We have a vision of such a place. It’s not a Document Prepared by : Jamie Hart dream, it’s a strategy... Madison County Planning Department - This page intentionally left blank - TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ……………………………………………….. Pages 1-12 Section 1: Challenges to Smart Growth in Madison County Pages 13-26 Section 2: Goals to Accomplish Smart Growth …………. Pages 27-28 Goal 1: Help Existing Places Thrive ……………………. Pages 29-46 Goal 2: Support the Rural Landscape ……………………. Pages 47-58 Goal 3: Create Great New Places ………………………. Pages 59-78 Goal 4: Make Livable Communities for All Ages ……… Pages 79-92 Conclusion ……………………………………………….. Page 93 - This page intentionally left blank - AA HealthyHealthy DesignDesign forfor MadisonMadison County:County Primer for Smart Growth Introduction This vision, established during the The layout, type, and development pattern of development of the 2009 Health growth in a village, town or city directly Improvement Plan for Madison County, impacts its economic vitality, livability, reflects a desire to retain the rural nature health, and environmental and cultural while also recognizing the need for growth, resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Smart Growth and Economic Success: Investing in Infill Development
    United States February 2014 Environmental Protection www.epa.gov/smartgrowth Agency SMART GROWTH AND ECONOMIC SUCCESS: INVESTING IN INFILL DEVELOPMENT Office of Sustainable Communities Smart Growth Program Acknowledgments This report was prepared by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Office of Sustainable Communities with the assistance of Renaissance Planning Group and RCLCO under contract number EP-W-11-009/010/11. Christopher Coes (Smart Growth America); Alex Barron (EPA Office of Policy); Dennis Guignet and Robin Jenkins (EPA National Center for Environmental Economics); and Kathleen Bailey, Matt Dalbey, Megan Susman, and John Thomas (EPA Office of Sustainable Communities) provided editorial reviews. EPA Project Leads: Melissa Kramer and Lee Sobel Mention of trade names, products, or services does not convey official EPA approval, endorsement, or recommendation. This paper is part of a series of documents on smart growth and economic success. Other papers in the series can be found at www.epa.gov/smartgrowth/economic_success.htm. Cover photos and credits: La Valentina in Sacramento, California, courtesy of Bruce Damonte; Small-lot infill in Washington, D.C., courtesy of EPA; The Fitzgerald in Baltimore, courtesy of The Bozzuto Group; and The Maltman Bungalows in Los Angeles, courtesy of Civic Enterprise Development. Table of Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................................ i I. Introduction .........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • ENDANGERED by Sprawl
    ENDANGERED by Sprawl H O W RUNAWAY DEVELOPMENT THREATENS AMERICA’S WILDLIFE by Reid Ewing and John Kostyack with Don Chen, Bruce Stein, and Michelle Ernst National Wildlife Federation Smart Growth America Nature Serve Endangered by Sprawl HOW RUNAWAY DEVELOPMENT THREATENS AMERICA’S WILDLIFE BY REID EWING AND JOHN KOSTYACK WITH DON CHEN, BRUCE STEIN, AND MICHELLE ERNST ©2005 National Wildlife Federation, Smart Growth America and NatureServe. All rights reserved. ISBN 0-9711053-3-2 Suggested Citation Ewing, R., J. Kostyack, D. Chen, B. Stein, and M. Ernst. Endangered by Sprawl: How Runaway Development Threatens America’s Wildlife. National Wildlife Federation, Smart Growth America, and NatureServe. Washington, D.C., January 2005. Acknowledgements Endangered by Sprawl was made possible by the generous support of the Deer Creek Foundation, the Henry M. Jackson Foundation, and the Moriah Fund. Research assistance was provided by Monica La, Jason McNees, Nicole Tadano, Greg Andeck, Kelly Pfeifer, Yin Lan Zhang, Mary Wilke, Caron Whitaker, Stephanie Vance, Kevin Snyder and David Goldberg, to whom the authors are extremely grateful. The authors also wish to thank green infrastructure experts Edward McMahon, Lee Epstein, Tom Reese, Tim Trohimovich, Jan Mueller, Michael Beck, and Carolyn Chase, as well as the planning professionals (too numerous to name here) that we consulted during the course of our research. Finally, many thanks to Professor Chris Nelson, Laura Hood Watchman, Jim McElfish, Jeff Lerner, and Beth Osborne for their thoughtful reviews of this report. About the Primary Authors Reid Ewing is a Research Professor at the National Center for Smart Growth Research and Education and an Associate Professor in the Urban Studies and Planning Program, University of Maryland.
    [Show full text]
  • Complete Streets in the States
    Complete Streets in the States: A Guide to Legislative Action AARP Government Affairs, State Advocacy & Strategy Integration Stefanie Seskin, National Complete Streets Coalition, Smart Growth America Barbara McCann, McCann Consulting January, 2013 © 2013, AARP Reprinting by permission only AARP, 601 E Street, NW, Washington, DC 20049 http://www.aarp.org/livable 1 of 56 Contents Foreword Introduction to the Toolkit Model State Legislation Legislative Elements Explained Analysis of Existing State Laws Strategic Guidance and Resources State-Level Implementation Stories Foreword The State Advocacy and Strategy Integration team has created this Complete Streets advocacy toolkit to assist AARP state offices in successful efforts to enact state-level Complete Streets policies, while also providing information to assist in local-level advocacy efforts. AARP’s public policy supports local and state jurisdictions in the adoption and implementation of transportation plans that accommodate all users, including pedestrians and bicyclists. Much of the nation’s work on road safety has focused on the needs of the drivers and passengers of motor vehicles, but the notion of planning for Complete Streets addresses safety from the perspective of all users. Complete Streets are designed and operated for safe, comfortable, and convenient travel by pedestrians, bicyclists, motorists, and transit riders of all ages and abilities. Such programs are augmented by transportation networks that provide a variety of services, thus allowing consumers a broad choice in how to travel safely and in line with their personal preferences, schedules, and budgets. The focus of Complete Streets initiatives has been on changing transportation agency policies and procedures so that these multimodal accommodations become a routine part of project development.
    [Show full text]
  • The Innovative DOT: a Handbook of Policy and Practice
    The Innovative DOT A handbook of policy and practice 2012 1 This handbook is a product of Smart Growth America and the State Smart Transportation Initiative. Smart Growth America is the only national organization dedicated to researching, advocating for and leading coalitions to bring smart growth practices to more communities nationwide. From providing more sidewalks to ensuring more homes are built near public transportation or that productive farms remain a part of our communities, smart growth helps make sure people across the nation can live in great neighborhoods. For additional information visit www.smartgrowthamerica.org. The State Smart Transportation Initiative, a network of 19 state DOTs, promotes transportation policies and practices that advance environmental sustainability and equitable economic development, while maintaining high standards of governmental efficiency and transparency. Housed at the University of Wisconsin, SSTI operates in three ways: as a community of practice, where participating agencies can learn together and share experiences as they implement innovative smart transportation policies; as a source of direct technical assistance to the agencies on transformative and replicable smart transportation efforts; and as a smart transportation resource to the wider transportation community, including local, state, and federal agencies. Learn more at www.ssti.us. This report was produced with the generous support of the Rockefeller Foundation. The Rockefeller Foundation fosters innovative solutions to many of the world’s most pressing challenges, affirming its mission, since 1913, to “promote the well-being” of humanity. Today, the Foundation works to ensure that more people can tap into the benefits of globalization while strengthening resilience to its risks.
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Assistance for Sustainable Communities: Building Blocks
    Technical Assistance for Sustainable Communities: Building Blocks Technical Assistance Tool: The Cool Planning Handbook Boulder, Colorado—March 4-5, 2013 To: Ilana Preuss, Roger Millar, Ella Krivitchenko from Smart Growth America and the City oF Boulder, Colorado From: Mandi Roberts, Otak, Inc. Date: June 20, 2013 (Final) Re: Suggested Next Steps as Outcome oF Technical Assistance Cool Planning Workshop Overview As a result oF the City oF Boulder, Colorado being awarded a Smart Growth America (SGA) technical assistance grant, representatives From SGA held an evening presentation on March 4, 2013 and a day-long workshop on March 5, 2013 in the community. The overall goal oF the technical assistance was to identiFy opportunities for integrating sustainability and preserving community character while enhancing economic competitiveness and quality of liFe with future growth in Boulder. The interactive community workshop series Focused on identifying speciFic smart growth strategies and tools For implementation in Boulder from the Cool Planning Handbook, developed by Otak, Inc., a planning and design Firm based in the PaciFic Northwest and a member oF SGA’s technical assistance team. Representatives From Otak helped Facilitate the workshop sessions, along with a representative from SGA. The evening oF March 4, members oF the community attended an introductory session on Smart Growth topics. On March 5, various representatives From the City oF Boulder and other agencies and organiZations attended a day-long workshop to explore more in-depth ideas and opportunities for Boulder. Workshop attendees participated in interactive discussions, tours of redevelopment opportunity areas of the community, and identification oF potential ideas, tools, and strategies for Boulder, including a map-based exercise in the aFternoon.
    [Show full text]
  • Dangerous by Design 2019
    2019 BY DESIGN DANGEROUS Source: April Bertelsen, PBOT Source: Stephen Lee Davis, SGA Source: Dr. Scott Crawford SMART GROWTH AMERICA is a national organization dedicated to researching, advocating for, and leading coalitions to bring better development to more communities nationwide. From providing more sidewalks to ensuring that more homes are built near public transportation or that productive farms remain a part of our communities, smart growth helps make sure people across the nation can live in great neighborhoods. Learn more at www.smartgrowthamerica.org. The NATIONAL COMPLETE STREETS COALITION, a program of Smart Growth America, seeks to fundamentally transform the look, feel, and function of the roads and streets in our communities, by changing the way most roads are planned, designed, and constructed. Complete Streets policies direct transportation planners and engineers to consistently design with all users in mind. Learn more at www.smartgrowthamerica.org/complete-streets. This project was made possible by the following organizations: AARP is the nation’s largest nonprofit, nonpartisan organization dedicated to empowering Americans 50 and older to choose how they live as they age. With nearly 38 million members and offices in every state, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands, AARP works to strengthen communities and advocate for what matters most to families with a focus on healthy security, financial stability and personal fulfillment. The AARP Livable Communities initiative works nationwide to support the efforts of neighborhoods, towns, cities, counties and rural areas to be livable for people of all ages. Websites: AARP.org and AARP.org/Livable | Email: [email protected] | Free Newsletter: AARP.org/Livable-Subscribe Facebook: /AARPLivableCommunities | Twitter: @AARPLivable | 601 E Street NW, Washington, D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Colorado Smart Growth Scorecard
    1 Welcome The Colorado Smart Growth Scorecard Welcome! This tool has been prepared by the Colorado Center for Healthy Communities, in partnership with The Orton Family Foundation. This project has been made possible through the financial support from the Gates Family Foundation and local governments, and the financial and staff support of The Orton Family Foundation. The Colorado Smart Growth Scorecard is adapted from the Vermont Smart Growth Scorecard with the permission of the Vermont Forum on Sprawl. COLORADO CENTER ORTON FAMILY VERMONT FORUM FOR HEALTHY FOUNDATION ON SPRAWL COMMUNITIES www.orton.org www.vtsprawl.org www.coloradocenter.org Helps citizens of rural Works to preserve Works to increase America define the Vermont's unique awareness and future, shape the working landscape implementation of growth and preserve and quality of life while encouraging innovations and tools to create health and the heritage of their communities. economic vitality in community centers. wealth in communities. Programs include: Programs and projects include: The Center is managed by Healthy Mountain Communities. HMC works to • CommunityVizTM: GIS based decision • Vermont Smart Growth Collaborative create collaborative solutions, regional support software that helps communities • New Models for Commercial and strategies and decision-support tools in visualize and analyze various growth Industrial Development the Roaring Fork and Colorado River and preservation options. • Way to Grow! Educational Programs Valleys. (www.hmccolorado.org) • Community Mapping: a program in • Vermont Neighborhoods Program schools where students work with local • Healthy Neighborhoods/Healthy Kids Colin Laird community partners to study land use • On-Line Community Assessment Tool Colorado Center for Healthy Communities issues and resources, producing maps and On-Line Planning Courses c/o Healthy Mountain Communities and information helpful to the partners P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • How Sprawl Aggravates the Effects of Drought
    Paving Our Way to Water Shortages: How Sprawl Aggravates the Effects of Drought ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Written by: Betsy Otto, Katherine Ransel, and Jason Todd, American Rivers Deron Lovaas and Hannah Stutzman, Natural Resources Defense Council John Bailey, Smart Growth America We owe a debt of gratitude to many people: Ted Brown, Center for Watershed Protection, for his invaluable advice in developing the model for estimating loss of groundwater infiltration and estimating imperviousness levels, and for reviewing the report, and to the Center for Watershed Protection for its excellent publications on the subject; Bill Cunningham, U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), for his assistance in interpreting USGS data in the USGS Ground Water Atlas, consulting on our estimation model, and reviewing the report; Bruce Ferguson, University of Georgia, for his help in developing our estimation model and in interpreting data, and for reviewing the report; Paul Barlow, USGS, for the information he provided, including several USGS publications on groundwater recharge, and to Terri Arnold, USGS, for sharing the methodology used for USGS’ recent study on the effects of land use and groundwater recharge in the Upper Illinois River Basin; Scott Meyer, Illinois Water Survey, for providing information on a recent study on water budgets for several urban watersheds in the Chicago metro area; Peter Van Metre of USGS for permission to adapt VMT-PAH graphs from his article, and for supplying the original data underpinning those graphs; Professor Rolf Pendall of Cornell
    [Show full text]