DOCSLIB.ORG

MRA Sampling and Testing Technical Guidance for Marijuana Products

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
MRA Sampling and Testing Technical Guidance for Marijuana Products SAMPLING AND TESTING TECHNICAL GUIDANCE FOR MARIJUANA PRODUCTS Revised July 01, 2021 Supersedes February 11, 2021 Version 4.0 This information is intended for use by licensed safety compliance facilities and licensed marihuana safety compliance facilities, collectively defined as laboratories, regulated by the Marijuana Regulatory Agency (MRA). This version of the technical guide combines and replaces all prior iterations published under the purview of MMFLA, MRTMA, MTA and the Administrative Rules. This information does not constitute legal advice and is subject to change. Licensees are encouraged to seek legal counsel to ensure their operations comply with the Medical Marihuana Facilities Licensing Act and associated Administrative Rules. Contents INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................................ 1 QUALITY ASSURANCE ................................................................................................................................................ 2 QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL ............................................................................................................................. 3 Laboratory organization and responsibility .......................................................................... 3 Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) ............................................................................. 3 Field sampling procedures .................................................................................................. 4 Instrument calibration procedures ....................................................................................... 4 Analytical procedures .......................................................................................................... 4 Data reduction, validation, reporting, and verification .......................................................... 5 Quality control (QC) checks and frequency of use .............................................................. 5 QUALITY CONTROL REQUIREMENTS ....................................................................................................................... 6 DAILY REQUIREMENTS ........................................................................................................................................... 6 Analytical Batch .................................................................................................................. 6 Laboratory Reagent Blank .................................................................................................. 6 ICV/CCV ............................................................................................................................. 6 Laboratory Fortified Matrix (LFM) / Laboratory Fortified Matrix Duplicate (LFMD) ............... 7 Duplicate ............................................................................................................................. 7 ANNUAL REQUIREMENTS ....................................................................................................................................... 7 Demonstration of Capability (DOC) ..................................................................................... 7 Method Detection Limit (MDL) ............................................................................................. 8 Corrective Action ................................................................................................................. 8 QC Acceptance ................................................................................................................... 8 QC ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA* ..................................................................................................................................... 8 DEFINITIONS ............................................................................................................................................................. 9 STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE (SOP) REQUIREMENTS ....................................................................... 11 VALIDATION REQUIREMENTS .............................................................................................................................. 11 Analytical chemistry methods: ............................................................................................13 Microbiological methods: ....................................................................................................13 Proficiency Testing .............................................................................................................14 REQUIRED TESTS .................................................................................................................................................. 14 Potency ..............................................................................................................................14 This information does not constitute legal advice and is subject to change. Licensees are encouraged to seek legal counsel to ensure their operations comply with the Medical Marihuana Facilities Licensing Act and associated Administrative Rules. Residual Solvent Testing ...................................................................................................15 Chemical Residue Testing .................................................................................................15 Heavy Metals .....................................................................................................................15 Water Activity .....................................................................................................................15 Microbial Assays (Qualitative) ............................................................................................16 Microbial Assays (Quantitative) ..........................................................................................16 Foreign Matter/Filth Analysis ..............................................................................................16 Vitamin E Acetate ..............................................................................................................17 FIELD SAMPLING ....................................................................................................................................................... 17 FIELD SAMPLING STAFF........................................................................................................................................ 18 Sampler Qualifications .......................................................................................................18 SAMPLING IN THE FIELD ....................................................................................................................................... 18 Field Duplicates .................................................................................................................18 Field Audits ........................................................................................................................19 Auditing Checks .................................................................................................................19 Field Quality Control ..........................................................................................................19 Sample size .......................................................................................................................19 Sampling a Batch of Marijuana ..........................................................................................20 Sampling Procedure for Pre-Rolls and Vape Products .......................................................21 Sampling Procedure for Concentrates ...............................................................................21 Table 1. Batch Sizes for Concentrates*. .............................................................................23 Marijuana-Infused Products (Edibles) ................................................................................23 Table 2. Batch Sizes for Marijuana-infused Products*. .......................................................23 Chain of Custody Documentation .......................................................................................24 ADDITIONAL TESTING GUIDELINES FOR FIELD SAMPLERS ................................................................................ 25 Testing marijuana product after failed initial safety testing .................................................25 Research and Development (R&D) Testing .......................................................................25 REQUIRED SAFETY TESTS AND ACTION LIMITS ................................................................................................... 25 POTENCY .................................................................................................................. Error! Bookmark not defined. Concentrates and Flower ...................................................................................................26 Marijuana-infused Products ...............................................................................................27 Table 3. Maximum THC Concentrations for Marihuana-Infused Products. .........................27 This information does not constitute legal advice and is subject to change. Licensees are encouraged to seek legal counsel to ensure their operations comply with the Medical Marihuana Facilities Licensing
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Coshocton County Agriculture & Natural Resources
    OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY EXTENSION COSHOCTON COUNTY AGRICULTURE & NATURAL RESOURCES Hello Coshocton County! The 49th Annual Fall Foliage & Farm Tour was a huge success as over 1,800 people attended this year’s event in eastern Coshocton County. We appreciate all of our stops for all their work to make this event such a success. It was a wonderful tour! See the enclosed article for more information about the tour and to see some pictures from the event. We have been overwhelmed to the response we have received to the pre-sale of tickets for the 4th Annual “For the Love of Lamb Dinner” on Saturday, November 2 at 6:00 pm. In fact, we are October 23, 2019 Issue already SOLD-OUT as all 65 tickets for the event have been purchased! What a great response to this fabulous dinner. Fall Foliage & Farm Tour a Success Typical Autumn Weather Changes Harvest continues to roll along across the county. I was pleased Ahead that we were able to harvest the “Boots on the Ground” soybean Hay Quality Indicators research plot in conjunction with Lapp Farms on Sunday, October Consider By-product Feeds in Rations 13. We were pleased with the results which will be published in This Winter OSU eFields publication this fall. We will also be sharing these Ohio CAUV Values Projected to results at our winter Agronomy School this winter. Decline Through 2020 Ohio Proposed Hemp Rules are Set Considering Being a Master Gardener I have also been busy planning Extension events and workshops November Farmers Breakfast for this winter.
    [Show full text]
  • Redondo CBD Report Fuller
    CBD Recommended Local Public Health And Safety Regulations Prepared by Jonatan Cvetko Co-Founder Angeles Emeralds 1/21/2020 Table of Contents Introduction 3 CBD: Hemp vs Cannabis 4 Recommendation #1: Ban all Non-Cannabis Sourced CBD 5 1. Public Health Threat 5 News Reports of CBD Dangers 6 2. Prohibited by Federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 8 3. Prohibited by California Department of Public Health 8 4. Prohibited by Los Angeles County Department of Public Health 8 5. Coalition of Cities Successfully Opposed AB 228 9 6. Unregulated and Unsafe CBD is infiltrating Cities 10 7. No minimum Age Restrictions 13 8. Limit Liability 13 9. Reduces City Tax Revenues 13 10. CBD shops can be fronts of Illegal Cannabis Activities 14 Recommendation #2: Maintain Ban on Outside Cannabis Delivery Services and BAN POS/Kiosk transactions 16 Outside Delivery Uses CBD Shops as a loophole 16 POS/Kiosks provide loopholes for transactions 18 Examples of other jurisdictions regulations 20 Thousand Oaks 20 Moorpark 20 Hanford 20 Farmersville 20 Lynwood 20 Humboldt 20 Fortuna 21 Blue Lake 21 Summary 21 Page 2 of 21 INTRODUCTION Angeles Emeralds is an association of patients, advocates, business owners and other thoughtful stakeholders advocating for responsible cannabis policy with a particular focus on: 1) Protecting our children 2) Developing a pathway to licensure for existing responsible operators 3) Environmentally responsible sun grown cultivation 4) Social and Health equity Jonatan Cvetko is the Co-Founder of Angeles Emeralds is a member of the LA County Office of Cannabis Management Cannabis Advisory Working Group and serves in other advisory roles with other jurisdictions.
    [Show full text]
  • Healing Herb Fitness High Stress Less
    CENTENNIAL SPOTLIGHT CENTENNIAL SPOTLIGHT ® ® WOMEN WEED™ STRESS& LESS HEALING HERB Discover the Marijuana's Calm of CBD Medical Miracles COVID-19 FITNESS HIGH Why the Plant How THC WOMEN & WEED & WOMEN Can Help Boosts Workouts ™ PLUS Is Cannabis CENTENNIAL SPECIALS the Female Viagra? Display Until 4/26/21 $12.99 CENTENNIAL SPOTLIGHT CENTENNIAL SPOTLIGHT ® ® WOMEN WEED™ STRESS& LESS HEALING HERB Discover the Marijuana's Calm of CBD Medical Miracles COVID-19 FITNESS HIGH Why the Plant How THC WOMEN & WEED & WOMEN Can Help Boosts Workouts ™ PLUS Is Cannabis CENTENNIAL SPECIALS the Female Viagra? Display Until 4/26/21 $15.99 CENTENNIAL SPOTLIGHT® WOMEN &WEED™ 2 WOMEN & WEED 3 SECTION 1 34 CANNABIS PRIMER 8 News of the Weed World 14 Words of Weed 54 EDITOR’S LETTER 16 Terpenes & Cannabinoids 20 Seven Studies to Know Now So 2020 was … well, it was 24 State of Disunion something. Between the 28 What’s Legal Where COVID-19 pandemic, murder You Live hornets, civil unrest and an election like no other, it’s no wonder so many of us are SECTION 2 excited to dive headfirst into 2021. And things are looking HEALTH AND WELLNESS good…at least on the cannabis 34 The Wonder Weed front. In this issue, we’ll talk 40 CBD and Stress about how weed won big in the 44 Could CBD Be the November elections, with five Female Viagra? states passing measures to 46 Weed With Your Workout legalize medical or adult-use marijuana and more soon to 50 When Pot Isn’t 28 follow, plus what the Biden Working for You administration means for federal legalization.
    [Show full text]
  • The Advisability and Feasibility of Developing USP Standards for Medical Cannabis Gabriel I
    STIMULI TO THE REVISION PROCESS Stimuli articles do not necessarily reflect the policies of the USPC or the USP Council of Experts The Advisability and Feasibility of Developing USP Standards for Medical Cannabis Gabriel I. Giancaspro, Nam-Cheol Kim, Jaap Venema, Susan de Mars, Jennifer Devine, Carlos Celestino, Christine E. Feaster, Ben A. Firschein, Mary S. Waddell, Stephen M. Gardner, and Earl Jones Jr.a ABSTRACT This Stimuli article analyzes the need for public quality standards for medical cannabis (defined herein as marijuana used for medical purposes under state laws) and the potential role of the U.S. Pharmacopeial Convention (USP) in addressing that need.1 Following legalization of the medical use of cannabis in several U.S. states and internationally, USP has received requests to investigate the advisability and feasibility of developing quality standards for medical cannabis. Development of quality standards for medical cannabis requires consideration of a wide range of scientific, legal, and policy issues that reach far beyond its classification as a botanical drug or herbal medicine. This article discusses the current regulatory and scientific landscape regarding medical cannabis, identifies issues related to the lack of quality standards for medical cannabis, and explores potential options for developing quality standards. USP seeks input from stakeholders on whether USP should proceed with development of quality standards for medical cannabis and if so, what approaches should be utilized to establish such standards. LEGAL AND REGULATORY LANDSCAPE The federal and state regulatory environment surrounding the medical use of cannabis involves many federal agencies and various different state laws. The evolving legal environment is an important consideration when evaluating the advisability and feasibility of USP developing a public standard for cannabis.
    [Show full text]
  • A Multifaceted Approach to Address Variation in Cannabis Sativa
    University of Northern Colorado Scholarship & Creative Works @ Digital UNC Dissertations Student Research 5-2019 A Multifaceted Approach to Address Variation in Cannabis Sativa Anna Louise Schwabe Follow this and additional works at: https://digscholarship.unco.edu/dissertations Recommended Citation Schwabe, Anna Louise, "A Multifaceted Approach to Address Variation in Cannabis Sativa" (2019). Dissertations. 554. https://digscholarship.unco.edu/dissertations/554 This Text is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Research at Scholarship & Creative Works @ Digital UNC. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholarship & Creative Works @ Digital UNC. For more information, please contact [email protected]. © 2019 ANNA LOUISE SCHWABE ALL RIGHTS RESERVED UNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN COLORADO Greeley, Colorado The Graduate School A MULTIFACETED APPROACH TO ADDRESS VARIATION IN CANNABIS SATIVA A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Anna Louise Schwabe College of Natural and Health Sciences School of Biological Sciences Biological Education May 2019 This Dissertation by: Anna Louise Schwabe Entitled: A Multifaceted Approach to Address Variation in Cannabis sativa has been approved as meeting the requirement for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in College of Natural and Health Sciences in School of Biological Sciences, Program of Biological Education. Accepted by the Doctoral Committee ____________________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise and Decline of Cannabis Prohibition the History of Cannabis in the UN Drug Control System and Options for Reform
    TRANSNATIONAL I N S T I T U T E THE RISE AND DECLINE OF CANNABIS PROHIBITION THE HISTORY OF CANNABIS IN THE UN DruG CONTROL SYSTEM AND OPTIONS FOR REFORM 3 The Rise and Decline of Cannabis Prohibition Authors Dave Bewley-Taylor Tom Blickman Martin Jelsma Copy editor David Aronson Design Guido Jelsma www.guidojelsma.nl Photo credits Hash Marihuana & Hemp Museum, Amsterdam/ Barcelona Floris Leeuwenberg Pien Metaal UNOG Library/League of Nations Archives UN Photo Printing Jubels, Amsterdam Contact Transnational Institute (TNI) De Wittenstraat 25 1052 AK Amsterdam Netherlands Tel: +31-(0)20-6626608 Fax: +31-(0)20-6757176 [email protected] www.tni.org/drugs www.undrugcontrol.info www.druglawreform.info Global Drug Policy Observatory (GDPO) Research Institute for Arts and Humanities Rooms 201-202 James Callaghan Building Swansea University Financial contributions Singleton Park, Swansea SA2 8PP Tel: +44-(0)1792-604293 This report has been produced with the financial www.swansea.ac.uk/gdpo assistance of the Hash Marihuana & Hemp Museum, twitter: @gdpo_swan Amsterdam/Barcelona, the Open Society Foundations and the Drug Prevention and Information Programme This is an Open Access publication distributed under (DPIP) of the European Union. the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which of TNI and GDPO and can under no circumstances be permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction regarded as reflecting the position of the donors. in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. TNI would appreciate receiving a copy of the text in which this document is used or cited.
    [Show full text]
  • Hemp: a New Crop with New Uses for North America*
    Reprinted from: Trends in new crops and new uses. 2002. J. Janick and A. Whipkey (eds.). ASHS Press, Alexandria, VA. Hemp: A New Crop with New Uses for North America* Ernest Small and David Marcus “Hemp” refers primarily to Cannabis sativa L. (Cannabaceae), although the term has been applied to dozens of species representing at least 22 genera, often prominent fiber crops. For examples, Manila hemp (abaca) is Musa textilis Née, sisal hemp is Agave sisalina Perrine, and sunn hemp is Crotolaria juncea L. Especially confusing is the phrase “Indian hemp,” which has been used both for narcotic Asian land races of C. sativa (so-called C. indica Lamarck of India) and Apocynum cannabinum L., which was used by North American Indians as a fiber plant. Cannabis sativa is a multi-purpose plant that has been domesticated for bast (phloem) fiber in the stem, a multi-purpose fixed oil in the “seeds” (achenes), and an intoxicating resin secreted by epidermal glands. The common names hemp and marijuana (much less frequently spelled mari- huana) have been applied loosely to all three forms, although historically hemp has been used primarily for the fiber cultigen and its fiber preparations, and marijuana for the drug cultigen and its drug preparations. The current hemp industry is making great efforts to point out that “hemp is not marijuana.” Italicized, Cannabis refers to the biological name of the plant (only one species of this genus is commonly recognized, C. sativa L.). Non-italicized, “cannabis” is a generic abstraction, widely used as a noun and adjective, and commonly (often loosely) used both for cannabis plants and/or any or all of the intoxicant preparations made from them.
    [Show full text]
  • A Baseline Review and Assessment of the Massachusetts Adult-Use Cannabis Industry: Market Data and Industry Participation
    A Baseline Review and Assessment of the Massachusetts Adult-Use Cannabis Industry: Market Data and Industry Participation February 2020 Massachusetts Cannabis Control Commission: Steven J. Hoffman, Chairman Kay Doyle, Commissioner Jennifer Flanagan, Commissioner Britte McBride, Commissioner Shaleen Title, Commissioner Shawn Collins, Executive Director Prepared by the Massachusetts Cannabis Control Commission Research and Information Technology Departments: Samantha M. Doonan, BA, Research Analyst David McKenna, PhD, Chief Technology Officer Julie K. Johnson, PhD, Director of Research Acknowledgements External Collaborators Alexandra F. Kritikos, MA, Brandeis University Cannabis Control Commission Communications Cedric Sinclair, Director of Communications Maryalice Gill, Press Secretary Kirsten Swenson, Communications Specialist Management Alisa Stack, Chief Operating Officer Erika Scibelli, Chief of Staff Legal Christine Baily, General Counsel Allie DeAngelis, Associate General Counsel Enforcement and Licensing Yaw Gyebi, Chief of Enforcement Paul Payer, Enforcement Counsel Kyle Potvin, Director of Licensing Patrick Beyea, Director of Investigations Derek Chamberlin, Licensing Analyst Anne DiMare, Licensing Specialist Government Affairs David Lakeman, Director of Government Affairs 2 Suggested bibliographic reference format: Doonan SM., McKenna, D., Johnson JK., (2020, February). A Baseline Review and Assessment of the Massachusetts Adult-Use Cannabis Industry— A Report to the Massachusetts Legislature. Boston, MA: Massachusetts Cannabis
    [Show full text]
  • The Forensic Identification of Marijuana: Suspicion, Moral Danger, and the Creation Of
    Title: The Forensic Identification of Marijuana: Suspicion, Moral Danger, and the Creation of Non-Psychoactive THC Author: Aaron Roussell* Running Head: “Marijuana Identification” Abstract: Federal and state laws present marijuana as a dangerous substance requiring coercive control and forbid private citizens from possessing, selling, or growing it. Possession cases brought under these laws depend on a forensic confirmation of taxonomic identity as Cannabis sativa to establish and successfully prosecute a case. Hemp Industries Association v. DEA (2003), a recent federal appeals court ruling, is at odds with this forensic process. American citizens may legally possess and even consume a similar substance — hemp and its derivatives — which can be made into such everyday objects as clothing, rope, and food products. Yet these two plants are both Cannabis sativa and differ only in physical structure and degree of natural tetrahydrocannabinol (THC). Synthetic THC is also a medically prescribed substance, which introduces further confusion into the legal standing of cannabis. Finally, *Department of Criminology, Law & Society, University of California, Irvine. Address correspondence to Aaron Roussell, Department of Criminology, Law & Society, University of California, Irvine, Social Ecology II, Irvine, CA 92697; email: [email protected]. 949-943-9860 Thanks to Professors Simon Cole, Justin Richland, Michael Clegg, and Dr. Fred Whitehurst for their direct or indirect contributions and assistance, as well as Akhila Ananth, Vivek Mittal, and Trish Goforth for their help with paper drafts and the editorial staff of the Albany Law Journal of Science and Technology for their superb efforts to improve the final version. Mistakes and weaknesses herein are entirely in spite of their efforts and remain the sole dominion of the author.
    [Show full text]
  • Hemp Cbd Scorecard an Evaluation of Hemp Cbd Producers
    HEMP CBD SCORECARD AN EVALUATION OF HEMP CBD PRODUCERS SEPTEMBER 2019 www.centerforfoodsafety.org CENTER FOR FOOD SAFETY (CFS) is a national non-profit public interest and environmental advocacy organization working to empower people, support farmers, and protect the earth from the harmful impacts of industrial agriculture. We inform and engage our nearly one million members and the general public about food and personal care products so that they can make fully-informed decisions in the marketplace. Project Manager and Editor: REBECCA SPECTOR Writers: KELSEY KRUGER, ANNA SCIARUTO Researchers: KELSEY KRUGER, JULIA RANNEY, ANNA SCIARUTO Design: DANIELA SKLAN | HUMMINGBIRD DESIGN STUDIO Published in partnership with the Center for Cannabis Safety. CENTER FOR CA NNABIS SAFE TY www.centerforcannabissafety.org CFS evaluated 40 companies that sell hemp CBD products to compare product policies and practices. Nearly half of the companies received a failing or near failing EXECUTIVE SUMMARY grade (“D” or “F”). ENTER FOR FOOD SAFETY ’S (CFS) “Hemp CBD Scorecard” evaluates many of Cthe top hemp CBD producers on their production and processing methods, testing Only 4 companies protocols, and transparency to consumers. received an “A.” There has been a rapidly growing interest in oils, tinctures, capsules, body lotions, and other personal care products containing cannabidiol, better known as CBD, derived from hemp. These products are popular because of their multiple uses, including potential healing properties and their ability to calm both humans and pets. CBD is one of the naturally occurring, non-psychoactive cannabinoids found in cannabis plants, specifically within the hemp plant. 1 This product has become infamous for its purported ability to help reduce pain and anxiety, leading to a huge growth in the market for products containing CBD.
    [Show full text]
  • Amicus Brief
    SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA STATE OF ARIZONA, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-18-0370-PR Appellee, Court of Appeals v. Division One No. 1 CA-CR 16-0703 RODNEY CHRISTOPHER JONES, Yavapai County Appellant. Superior Court No. P1300CR201400328 AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF OF ARIZONA DISPENSARIES ASSOCIATION IN SUPPORT OF APPELLANT (Filed with consent of all parties) Eric M. Fraser (027241) OSBORN MALEDON, P.A. 2929 North Central Avenue, Ste. 2100 Phoenix, Arizona 85012 602-640-9000 [email protected] Attorneys for Amicus Curiae Arizona Dispensaries Association TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TABLE OF AUTHORITIES .................................................................................... 3 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................... 5 INTEREST OF AMICUS CURIAE ........................................................................ 5 REASONS TO GRANT REVIEW .......................................................................... 6 I. The Opinion warrants review because it will have an enormous impact across Arizona. .............................................................. 6 II. The Opinion upends the industry’s settled expectations. ...................... 7 III. Dispensaries manufacture concentrates using well-known, long-established processes that yield products that satisfy a wide range of patient requirements and preferences. ..........................11 A. Concentrates can be made using extremely simple processes. ...........................................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • Kief USA, LLC D/B/A Hui
    Kief USA, LLC d/b/a Hui, LLC Community Outreach Meeting Proposal for Marijuana Establishment at Presentation July 7, 2021 1 Turner Street, Attleboro, MA (fka 330 Turner Street, Attleboro, MA) LEADERSHIP Hui Zhang, President, Owner Tucker Cole, Master Grower - Women, Minority Entrepreneur - Over ten years of growing experience in the - First Generation Immigrant Entrepreneur horticulture industry - B.S. in Information Technology from - Over five years of experience in the Cannabis University of Wuhan and Master’s in Industry Financial Accounting from Renmin University - Experience in consulting, facility design, account of China management, research, and breeding of Cannabis Project Team - Managed ten thousand square feet greenhouses - Ali Lee, COO - Legal Advisors: Adam Braillard, Ashley Tan, and Ashfin Islam of Prince Lobel Tye LLP - CSI Engineering LLC, James R. O”Brien, LEED, AP BD+C - Keenan + Kenny Architects LTD, Antonia Kenny CANNABIS IN MASSACHUSETTS Massachusetts Industry Snapshot: ● 8,464 Applications, 794 Licenses ● Total gross sales: $1.47B ● 13,005 Agent Registrations PROPOSED FACILITY ● Marijuana Cultivation and Marijuana Product Manufacturing Establishment ● 1 Turner Street, Attleboro, MA (fka 330 Turner Street) ● Approximately ~84,000 SF on second floor ● Hours: 24/7 hours of cultivation ● 15-20 employees; commitment to use best efforts to hire locally and hire diversity ● At least 21 exclusive Parking Spaces for Hui LLC immediately next to the entrance of the Facility ● Product pickup from secure side loading dock ZONING/LOCATION 1 Turner Street, Attleboro, MA (fka 330 Turner Street) • Industrial Zoning District • Second floor of Existing ~84,000 SF building • 21 exclusive Parking Spaces for the proposed Facility (more available on site) • Building is not within 500 feet of any school (grades K-12), day care, public park, etc.
    [Show full text]