Word Version
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Final recommendations on the future electoral arrangements for Harborough in Leicestershire Report to the Electoral Commission June 2002 BOUNDARY COMMITTEE FOR ENGLAND © Crown Copyright 2002 Applications for reproduction should be made to: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office Copyright Unit. The mapping in this report is reproduced from OS mapping by the Electoral Commission with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, © Crown Copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Licence Number: GD 03114G. This report is printed on recycled paper. Report No:289 2 BOUNDARY COMMITTEE FOR ENGLAND CONTENTS page WHAT IS THE BOUNDARY COMMITTEE FOR ENGLAND? 5 SUMMARY 7 1 INTRODUCTION 13 2 CURRENT ELECTORAL ARRANGEMENTS 15 3 DRAFT RECOMMENDATIONS 21 4 RESPONSES TO CONSULTATION 23 5 ANALYSIS AND FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS 25 6 WHAT HAPPENS NEXT? 41 APPENDIX A Final Recommendations for Harborough: Detailed Mapping 43 A large map illustrating the proposed ward boundaries for Harborough is inserted inside the back cover of this report. BOUNDARY COMMITTEE FOR ENGLAND 3 4 BOUNDARY COMMITTEE FOR ENGLAND WHAT IS THE BOUNDARY COMMITTEE FOR ENGLAND? The Boundary Committee for England is a committee of the Electoral Commission, an independent body set up by Parliament under the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000. The functions of the Local Government Commission for England were transferred to the Electoral Commission and its Boundary Committee on 1 April 2002 by the Local Government Commission for England (Transfer of Functions) Order 2001 (SI 2001 No 3692). The Order also transferred to the Electoral Commission the functions of the Secretary of State in relation to taking decisions on recommendations for changes to local authority electoral arrangements and implementing them. Members of the Committee are: Pamela Gordon (Chair) Professor Michael Clarke CBE Kru Desai Robin Gray Joan Jones Ann M Kelly Professor Colin Melors Archie Gall (Director) We are required by law to review the electoral arrangements of every principal local authority in England. Our aim is to ensure that the number of electors represented by each councillor in an area is as nearly as possible the same, taking into account local circumstances. We can recommend changes to ward boundaries, the number of councillors and ward names. We can also recommend changes to the electoral arrangements of parish and town councils. This report sets out our final recommendations on the electoral arrangements for the district of Harborough in Leicestershire. BOUNDARY COMMITTEE FOR ENGLAND 5 6 BOUNDARY COMMITTEE FOR ENGLAND SUMMARY The Local Government Commission for England (LGCE) began a review of Harborough’s electoral arrangements on 12 June 2001. It published its draft recommendations for electoral arrangements on 15 January 2002, after which it undertook an eight-week period of consultation. As a consequence of the transfer of functions referred to earlier, it falls to us, the Boundary Committee for England, to complete the work of the LGCE and submit final recommendations to the Electoral Commission. • This report summarises the representations received by the LGCE during consultation on its draft recommendations, and contains our final recommendations to the Electoral Commission. We found that the existing arrangements provide unequal representation of electors in Harborough: • in 15 of the 26 wards the number of electors represented by each councillor varies by more than 10 per cent from the average for the district and nine wards vary by more than 20 per cent; • by 2006 this situation is expected to worsen, with the number of electors per councillor forecast to vary by more than 10 per cent from the average in 17 wards and by more than 20 per cent in nine wards. Our main final recommendations for future electoral arrangements (see Tables 1 and 2 and paragraphs 91-92) are that: • Harborough District Council should have 37 councillors, the same as at present; • there should be 25 wards, instead of 26 as at present; • the boundaries of 23 of the existing wards should be modified, resulting in a net reduction of one, and three wards should retain their existing boundaries; • elections should continue to take place every four years. The purpose of these proposals is to ensure that, in future, each district councillor represents approximately the same number of electors, bearing in mind local circumstances. • In 21 of the proposed 25 wards the number of electors per councillor would vary by no more than 10 per cent from the district average. • This improved level of electoral equality is forecast to continue, with the number of electors per councillor in only one ward, Misterton, expected to vary by more than 10 per cent from the average for the district in 2006. Recommendations are also made for changes to parish and town council electoral arrangements which provide for: • revised warding arrangements, the reduction and redistribution of councillors serving the parish of Broughton; • revised warding arrangements, an increase and redistribution of councillors serving the parish of Lutterworth. BOUNDARY COMMITTEE FOR ENGLAND 7 All further correspondence on these final recommendations and the matters discussed in this report should be sent to the Electoral Commission, to arrive no later than 18 July 2002: The Secretary Electoral Commission Trevelyan House Great Peter Street London SW1P 2HW 8 BOUNDARY COMMITTEE FOR ENGLAND Table 1: Final Recommendations: Summary Ward name Number of Constituent areas Map reference councillors 1 Billesdon 1 The parishes of Billesdon, Cranoe, Frisby, Gaulby, Map 2 Glooston, Goadby, Illston on the Hill, King’s Norton, Noseley, Rolleston, Slawston, Stonton Wyville and Welham The parishes of Husbands Bosworth, Knaptoft, 2 Map 2 Bosworth 1 Mowsley, North Kilworth and South Kilworth Broughton Astley – Part of Broughton Astley parish (the proposed 3 1 Map 2 and large map Astley Astley parish ward) Broughton Astley – Part of Broughton Astley parish (the proposed 4 1 Map 2 and large map Broughton Broughton parish ward) Broughton Astley – Part of Broughton Astley parish (the proposed 5 1 Map 2 and large map Primethorpe Primethorpe parish ward) Broughton Astley – Part of Broughton Astley parish (the proposed 6 1 Map 2 and large map Sutton Sutton parish ward) The parishes of Ashby Magna, Ashby Parva, 7 Map 2 Dunton 1 Dunton Bassett, Frolesworth and Leire 8 Fleckney 2 Unchanged (the parish of Fleckney) Map 2 Unchanged (the parishes of Burton Overy, Carlton 9 Map 2 Glen 2 Curlieu, Great Glen, Little Stretton and Wistow) The parishes of East Langton, Kibworth Beauchamp, Kibworth Harcourt, Shangton, 10 Map 2 Kibworth 3 Smeeton Westerby, Thorpe Langton, Tur Langton and West Langton The parishes of Foxton, Gumley, Laughton, 11 Map 2 Lubenham 1 Lubenham, Saddington and Theddingworth Lutterworth Part of Lutterworth parish (the proposed Brookfield 12 1 Map 2 and large map Brookfield parish ward) Part of Lutterworth parish (the proposed Orchard 13 Map 2 and large map Lutterworth Orchard 1 parish ward) Part of Lutterworth parish (the proposed Springs 14 Map 2 and large map Lutterworth Springs 1 parish ward) Part of Lutterworth parish (the proposed Swift parish 15 Map 2 and large map Lutterworth Swift 1 ward) Part of Market Harborough North ward; part of Market Harborough 16 3 Market Harborough Bowden ward; the parish of Map 2 and large map – Arden Great Bowden Market Harborough 17 2 Part of Market Harborough Bowden ward Map 2 and large map – Little Bowden Market Harborough 18 2 Part of Market Harborough West ward Map 2 and large map – Logan Part of Market Harborough Bowden ward; Market Market Harborough 19 3 Harborough South ward; part of Market Harborough Map 2 and large map – Welland West ward The parishes of Catthorpe, Cotesbach, Gilmorton, 20 Misterton 1 Misterton with Walcote, Shawell, Swinford and Map 2 Westrill & Starmore The parishes of Allexton, Blaston, Bringhurst, 21 Nevill 1 Drayton, Great Easton, Hallaton, Horninghold, Map 2 Medbourne, Nevill Holt and Stockerston BOUNDARY COMMITTEE FOR ENGLAND 9 Ward name Number of Constituent areas Map reference councillors The parishes of Arnesby, Bruntingthorpe, Kimcote & 22 Peatling 1 Walton, Peatling Magna, Peatling Parva, Shearsby Map 2 and Willoughby Waterleys The parishes of Houghton on the Hill, Scraptoft, 23 Map 2 Thurnby & Houghton 3 Stoughton and Thurnby & Bushby The parishes of Cold Newton, East Norton, Hungarton, Keyham, Launde, Loddington, Lowesby, 24 Map 2 Tilton 1 Marefield, Owston & Newbold, Skeffington, Tilton on the Hill, Tugby & Keythorpe and Withcote Unchanged (the parishes of Bittesby, Bitteswell, 25 Ullesthorpe 1 Claybrooke Magna, Claybrooke Parva and Map 2 Ullesthorpe) Notes: 1 Market Harborough is the only unparished part of the district and comprises the four wards indicated above. 2 Map 2 and Appendix A, including the large map in the back of the report, illustrate the proposed wards outlined above. 10 BOUNDARY COMMITTEE FOR ENGLAND Table 2: Final Recommendations for Harborough Ward name Number Electorate Number of Variance Electorate Number of Variance of (2001) electors per from (2006) electors per from councillors councillor average councillor average % % 1 Billesdon 1 1,416 1,416 -13 1,591 1,591 -7 2 Bosworth 1 1,770 1,770 8 1,803 1,803 5 Broughton Astley – 3 1 1,770 1,770 8 1,759 1,759 3 Astley Broughton Astley – 4 1 1,547 1,547 -5 1,679 1,679 -2 Broughton Broughton Astley – 5 1 1,540 1,540 -6 1,601 1,601