The Role of Stellar Feedback in the Dynamics of H Ii Regions
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
THE ROLE OF STELLAR FEEDBACK IN THE DYNAMICS OF H II REGIONS The MIT Faculty has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters. Citation Lopez, Laura A., Mark R., Alberto D. Bolatto, J. Xavier Prochaska, Enrico Ramirez-Ruiz, and Daniel Castro. "THE ROLE OF STELLAR FEEDBACK IN THE DYNAMICS OF H II REGIONS." The Astrophysical Journal 795:121 (2014 November 10), p.1-18. © 2014 American Astronomical Society. As Published http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/795/2/121 Publisher Institute of Physics/American Astronomical Society Version Final published version Citable link http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/93181 Terms of Use Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use. The Astrophysical Journal, 795:121 (18pp), 2014 November 10 doi:10.1088/0004-637X/795/2/121 C 2014. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. Printed in the U.S.A. THE ROLE OF STELLAR FEEDBACK IN THE DYNAMICS OF H ii REGIONS Laura A. Lopez1,5,6, Mark R. Krumholz2, Alberto D. Bolatto3, J. Xavier Prochaska2,4, Enrico Ramirez-Ruiz2, and Daniel Castro1 1 MIT-Kavli Institute for Astrophysics and Space Research, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, 37-664H, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA; [email protected] 2 Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, University of California Santa Cruz, 1156 High Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95060, USA 3 Department of Astronomy, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA 4 University of California Observatories, Lick Observatory, 1156 High Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA Received 2013 September 20; accepted 2014 September 15; published 2014 October 21 ABSTRACT Stellar feedback is often cited as the biggest uncertainty in galaxy formation models today. This uncertainty stems from a dearth of observational constraints as well as the great dynamic range between the small scales (1 pc) where the feedback originates and the large scales of galaxies (1 kpc) that are shaped by this feedback. To bridge this divide, in this paper we aim to assess observationally the role of stellar feedback at the intermediate scales of H ii regions (∼10–100 pc). In particular, we employ multiwavelength data to examine several stellar feedback mechanisms in a sample of 32 H ii regions (with ages ∼3–10 Myr) in the Large and Small Magellanic Clouds, respectively. Using optical, infrared, radio, and X-ray images, we measure the pressures exerted on the shells from the direct stellar radiation, the dust-processed radiation, the warm ionized gas, and the hot X-ray-emitting gas. We find that the warm ionized gas dominates over the other terms in all of the sources, although two have comparable dust-processed radiation pressures to their warm gas pressures. The hot gas pressures are comparatively weak, while the direct radiation pressures are one to two orders of magnitude below the other terms. We discuss the implications of these results, particularly highlighting evidence for hot gas leakage from the H ii shells and regarding the momentum deposition from the dust-processed radiation to the warm gas. Furthermore, we emphasize that similar observational work should be done on very young H ii regions to test whether direct radiation pressure and hot gas can drive the dynamics at early times. Key words: galaxies: star clusters: general – H ii regions – stars: formation Online-only material: color figures ∼ 1. INTRODUCTION fraction ( 1%–2%) of GMC mass is converted to stars per cloud free-fall time (e.g., Zuckerman & Evans 1974; Krumholz & Tan Stellar feedback—the injection of energy and momentum by 2007; Evans et al. 2009; Heiderman et al. 2010; Krumholz et al. stars—originates at the small scales of star clusters (1 pc), yet 2012). This inefficiency can be attributed to stellar feedback it shapes the interstellar medium (ISM) on large scales (1 kpc). processes of H ii regions that act to disrupt and ultimately At large scales, stellar feedback is necessary in order to form to destroy their host clouds (e.g., Whitworth 1979; Matzner realistic galaxies in simulations and to account for observed 2002; Krumholz et al. 2006;Vazquez-Semadeni´ et al. 2010; galaxy properties. In the absence of feedback, baryonic matter Goldbaum et al. 2011;Daleetal.2005, 2012, 2013). In addition cools rapidly and efficiently forms stars, producing an order of to the pressure of the warm ionized H ii region gas itself, there magnitude too much stellar mass and consuming most available are several other forms of stellar feedback that can drive the gas in the galaxy (e.g., White & Rees 1978;Keresetal.ˇ 2009). dynamics of H ii regions and deposit energy and momentum Stellar feedback prevents this “cooling catastrophe” by heating in the surrounding ISM: the direct radiation of stars (e.g., gas as well as removing low angular momentum baryons from Krumholz & Matzner 2009;Falletal.2010;Murrayetal. galactic centers, thereby allowing only a small fraction of the 2010; Hopkins et al. 2011), the dust-processed infrared radiation baryonic budget of dark matter halos to be converted to stars. The (e.g., Thompson et al. 2005; Murray et al. 2010; Andrews removal of baryons may also flatten the dark matter mass profile, & Thompson 2011), stellar winds and supernovae (SNe; e.g., critical to form bulgeless dwarf galaxies (e.g., Mashchenko Yorke et al. 1989; Harper-Clark & Murray 2009; Rogers & et al. 2008; Governato et al. 2010, 2012). Furthermore, stellar Pittard 2013), and protostellar outflows/jets (e.g., Quillen et al. feedback possibly drives kiloparsec-scale galactic winds and 2005; Cunningham et al. 2006; Li & Nakamura 2006; Nakamura outflows (see Veilleux et al. 2005 for a review) which have been &Li2008; Wang et al. 2010). frequently observed in local galaxies (e.g., Bland & Tully 1988; From a theoretical perspective, SNe were the first feedback Martin 1999; Strickland et al. 2004) as well as in galaxies at mechanism to be considered as a means to remove gas from moderate to high redshift (e.g., Ajiki et al. 2002;Fryeetal. low-mass galaxies (e.g., Dekel & Silk 1986) and to prevent the 2002; Shapley et al. 2003; Rubin et al. 2013). cooling catastrophe (e.g., White & Frenk 1991). However, reso- At the smaller scales of star clusters and giant molecular lution limitations precluded the explicit modeling of individual clouds (GMCs), newborn stars dramatically influence their SNe in galaxy formation simulations, so phenomenological pre- environments. Observational evidence suggests that only a small scriptions were employed to account for “sub-grid” feedback (e.g., Katz 1992; Navarro & White 1993; Mihos & Hernquist 5 NASA Einstein Fellow. 1994). Since then, extensive work has been done to improve and 6 Pappalardo Fellow in Physics. to compare these sub-grid models (e.g., Thacker & Couchman 1 The Astrophysical Journal, 795:121 (18pp), 2014 November 10 Lopez et al. 2000; Springel & Hernquist 2003; Saitoh et al. 2008; Teyssier Table 1 et al. 2010; Hopkins et al. 2011; Scannapieco et al. 2012; Stinson Sample of H ii Regions et al. 2012; Aumer et al. 2013; Kim et al. 2014). Furthermore, Source Alt Name R.A. Decl. Radiusa Radiusa the use of “zoom-in” simulations (which can model feedback (J2000) (J2000) (arcmin) (pc) physics down to 1 pc scale) has enabled the modeling of sev- LMC sources eral modes of feedback simultaneously (e.g., Agertz et al. 2013; Hopkins et al. 2013; Renaud et al. 2013; Stinson et al. 2013; N4 DEM L008 04:52:09 −66:55:13 0.7 10.2 N11 DEM L034, L041 04:56:41 −66:27:19 10.0 145 Agertz & Kravtsov 2014; Ceverino et al. 2014). − While simulations are beginning to incorporate many feed- N30 DEM L105, L106 05:13:51 67:27:22 3.1 45.1 N44 DEM L150 05:22:16 −67:57:09 7.1 103 back mechanisms, most observational work focuses on the N48 DEM L189 05:25:50 −66:15:03 5.2 75.6 effects of the individual modes. Consequently, the relative con- N55 DEM L227, L228 05:32:33 −66:27:20 3.6 52.4 tribution of these components and which processes dominate N59 DEM L241 05:35:24 −67:33:22 3.9 56.7 in different conditions remains uncertain. To address this issue, N79 DEM L010 04:52:04 −69:22:34 4.4 64.0 we recently employed multiwavelength imaging of the giant N105 DEM L086 05:09:56 −68:54:03 2.9 42.2 H ii region N157 (30 Doradus; “30 Dor” hereafter) to assess N119 DEM L132 05:18:45 −69:14:03 5.9 85.8 the dynamical role of several stellar feedback mechanisms in N144 DEM L199 05:26:38 −68:49:55 4.9 71.3 driving the shell expansion (Lopez et al. 2011). In particular, we N157 30 Dor 05:38:36 −69:05:33 6.8 98.9 N160 05:40:22 −69:37:35 5.0 40.0 measured the pressures associated with the different feedback − modes across 441 regions to map the pressure components as a N180 DEM L322, L323 05:48:52 70:03:51 2.7 39.3 N191 DEM L064 05:04:35 −70:54:27 2.1 30.5 function of position; we considered the direct radiation pressure N206 DEM L221 05:30:38 −71:03:53 7.7 112 exerted by the light from massive stars, the dust-processed ra- diation pressure, the warm ionized (∼104 K) gas pressure, and SMC sources the hot shocked (∼107 K) gas pressure from stellar winds and DEM S74 00:53:14 −73:12:18 2.7 47.9 SNe.