Floodplain Forests of the Susquehanna Basin

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Floodplain Forests of the Susquehanna Basin Classification, Assessment and Protection of Non-Forested Floodplain Wetlands of the Susquehanna Drainage Report To: The United States Environmental Protection Agency and The Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources Bureau of Forestry Ecological Services Section Submitted By: The Nature Conservancy Pennsylvania Science Office 208 Airport Drive Middletown, Pennsylvania and Western Pennsylvania Conservancy 209 Fourth Avenue Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 31 December 2004 U.S. EPA Wetland Protection State Development Grant no. CD-98337501 DCNR Service Purchase Contract no.’s SP3810055 and SP3810056 Published by: The Pennsylvania Natural Heritage Program TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS............................................................................................................ 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................ 2 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 4 PURPOSE....................................................................................................................................... 5 METHODS ..................................................................................................................................... 6 Site Selection .............................................................................................................................. 6 Vegetation Sampling................................................................................................................... 9 Vegetation Data Analysis ......................................................................................................... 10 Mammal Sampling.................................................................................................................... 10 Insect Sampling......................................................................................................................... 11 Pitfall trap collection ............................................................................................................ 11 Blacklight trap collection...................................................................................................... 11 Hand-Collection.................................................................................................................... 12 Insect Data Analysis ................................................................................................................. 12 RESULTS ..................................................................................................................................... 13 Floristics.................................................................................................................................... 13 Vegetation Community Classification...................................................................................... 18 Plant Community Descriptions................................................................................................. 24 SYCAMORE – MIXED HARDWOOD RIVERINE SHRUBLAND.................................... 24 RIVER BIRCH (SYCAMORE) – MIXED HARDWOOD RIVERINE SHRUBLAND........ 25 MIXED HARDWOOD RIVERINE SHRUBLAND............................................................ 26 BLACK WILLOW – MIXED HARDWOOD RIVERINE SHRUBLAND ........................... 27 SILVER MAPLE (RIVER BIRCH) – MIXED HARDWOOD RIVERINE SHRUBLAND.. 27 SPECKLED ALDER RIVERINE SHRUBLAND............................................................... 28 SYCAMORE (WILLOW) – MIXED HARDWOOD RIVERINE DWARF SHRUBLAND.. 29 WILLOW – INDIAN GRASS RIVERINE SHRUBLAND................................................... 30 REED CANARY GRASS RIVERINE GRASSLAND .......................................................... 31 SEDGE – SPOTTED JOE PYE WEED RIVERINE HERBACEOUS VEGETATION ...... 32 RIVERINE SCOUR VEGETATION .................................................................................. 33 WATER WILLOW EMERGENT BED............................................................................... 34 LIZARD’S TAIL EMERGENT BED.................................................................................. 35 Mammal Surveys ...................................................................................................................... 36 Insect Surveys ........................................................................................................................... 38 DISCUSSION............................................................................................................................... 40 Plant Community Classification ............................................................................................... 40 Comparision to Existing Pennsylvania Non-forested Floodplain Wetland Community Classification............................................................................................................................. 46 Comparision to Other State Non-forested Floodplain Classifications...................................... 47 Emergent and low elevation community types...................................................................... 47 Successional mid-elevation grassland community types ...................................................... 48 Successional mid-elevation shrubland community types...................................................... 49 Moderately persistent, low terrace community types ........................................................... 50 i Insect Assemblages in Non-forested Floodplain Communities................................................ 50 COLEOPTERA................................................................................................................. 50 Aquatic species.............................................................................................................. 51 Hygrophilus Species...................................................................................................... 51 Terrestrial or Dry Habitat Species ............................................................................... 52 Additional Taxa............................................................................................................. 52 DIPTERA.......................................................................................................................... 53 LEPIDOPTERA................................................................................................................ 53 Species of Special Interest .................................................................................................... 55 COLEOPTERA................................................................................................................. 56 LEPIDOPTERA................................................................................................................ 58 CONSERVATION IMPLICATIONS .......................................................................................... 59 Sites of State Significance ........................................................................................................ 59 Conservation Strategies ............................................................................................................ 60 BIBLIOGRAPHY......................................................................................................................... 63 APPENDICES .............................................................................................................................. 68 Appendix I. Location of Non-Forested Floodplain Wetland Sites in the Susquehanna River Watershed ................................................................................................................................. 69 Appendix II. Conservation Rank Definitions ........................................................................ 120 Appendix III. Top Ten Most Common Lepidoptera Species Found at Six Sites in the Susquehanna River Watershed ............................................................................................... 123 ii LIST OF TABLES Table 1. The distribution of vegetation plots sampled across TNC Ecoregions and river sections wihtin the Susquehanna River watershed…………………………………………………………8 Table 2. Vascular plants identified in non-forested floodplain wetland communities in the Susquehanna River watershed …………………………………………………………..14 Table 3. Number of small mammal specimens captured at 5 sites in the Susquehanna River watershed………………………………………………………………………………...37 Table 4. Summary of bat captures at 3 sites in the Susquehanna River watershed………..……...38 Table 5. Summary by taxa of insect abundance and species diversity data from six sampling sites in the Susquehanna River watershed …………………………………..….…….………39 Table 6. Summary by site of insect abundance and species diversity data from six sampling sites in the Susquehanna River watershed ………………………………………….…………...39 Table 7. Summary descriptions for thirteen non-forested floodplain communities in the Susquehanna River Watershed…………………………………………………………..44 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Ecoregional map of Pennsylvania showing locations of 50 floodplain wetland sampling sites in the Susquehanna River watershed.…..…………………………………..……..7 Figure 2. Major drainages and selected tributaries within the Susquehanna watershed, showing the locations of 50 floodplain wetland sampling sites …………………………………….7 Figure 3.
Recommended publications
  • Verbreitung, Ökologie Und Biologie Von Luperina Dumerilii (Duponchel, 1826) in Deutschland (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)
    146 Nachr. entomol. Ver. Apollo, N. F. 23 (3): 147–158 (2002) 147 Verbreitung, Ökologie und Biologie von Luperina dumerilii (Duponchel, 1826) in Deutschland (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) Michael Ochse, Thomas Geier und Frank Rosenbauer Dr. Michael Ochse, Am Sonnenberg 17, D-34260 Kaufungen, Deutschland; E-Mail: [email protected] Dr. Thomas Geier, Fachgebiet Botanik, Forschungsanstalt Geisenheim, von-Lade-Straße 1, D-65366 Geisenheim, Deutschland; E-Mail: [email protected] Dr. Frank Rosenbauer, 16 Wait Street, Boston, MA 02120, U.S.A.; E-Mail: [email protected] Zusammenfassung: Luperina dumerilii (Duponchel, 1826) behandelt. In der Literatur finden sich lediglich einige bewohnt in Deutschland nur wenige, klimatisch begünstigte grobe Hinweise auf das Habitat und die — vermutlich Regionen im Süden, namentlich die Markgräfler Rhein- ausschließlich aus Zuchtversuchen ermittelte — Nah- ebene, den Kaiserstuhl, den Rheingau, das Nahetal und Main- franken. In Mainfranken gelang erstmals der Freilandfund rung der Präimaginalstadien von Dumerils Graswurzel- einer Raupe. Es wird beschrieben, daß als Habitat Wiesen eule (deutscher Name nach Steiner 1998). Im Gegensatz auf lockerem Untergrund in Frage kommen, wo die Eier an dazu werden in der vorliegenden Publikation, basierend Gräsern nahe der Erdoberfläche abgelegt werden und sich auf eigenen Freilandbeobachtungen, neue Erkenntnisse die Raupen dann im Erdreich von Graswurzeln ernähren. zur Biologie und Ökologie der Art detailliert darge- Neben den Freilandbeobachtungen werden Daten zur Prä- stellt. Zusätzlich dazu werden die bisher nur kurz bei imaginalentwicklung unter Zuchtbedingungen über zwei Generationen mitgeteilt und Angaben zur Variabilität der Geier (1995) erwähnten Beobachtungen zur Präimagi- Imagines gemacht. nalentwicklung unter Zuchtbedingungen ausführlicher dokumentiert und Angaben zur Variabilität der Imagi- Distribution, ecology, and biology of Luperina dumerilii nes gemacht.
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera of North America 5
    Lepidoptera of North America 5. Contributions to the Knowledge of Southern West Virginia Lepidoptera Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Lepidoptera of North America 5. Contributions to the Knowledge of Southern West Virginia Lepidoptera by Valerio Albu, 1411 E. Sweetbriar Drive Fresno, CA 93720 and Eric Metzler, 1241 Kildale Square North Columbus, OH 43229 April 30, 2004 Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Cover illustration: Blueberry Sphinx (Paonias astylus (Drury)], an eastern endemic. Photo by Valeriu Albu. ISBN 1084-8819 This publication and others in the series may be ordered from the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity, Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523 Abstract A list of 1531 species ofLepidoptera is presented, collected over 15 years (1988 to 2002), in eleven southern West Virginia counties. A variety of collecting methods was used, including netting, light attracting, light trapping and pheromone trapping. The specimens were identified by the currently available pictorial sources and determination keys. Many were also sent to specialists for confirmation or identification. The majority of the data was from Kanawha County, reflecting the area of more intensive sampling effort by the senior author. This imbalance of data between Kanawha County and other counties should even out with further sampling of the area. Key Words: Appalachian Mountains,
    [Show full text]
  • Insect Survey of Four Longleaf Pine Preserves
    A SURVEY OF THE MOTHS, BUTTERFLIES, AND GRASSHOPPERS OF FOUR NATURE CONSERVANCY PRESERVES IN SOUTHEASTERN NORTH CAROLINA Stephen P. Hall and Dale F. Schweitzer November 15, 1993 ABSTRACT Moths, butterflies, and grasshoppers were surveyed within four longleaf pine preserves owned by the North Carolina Nature Conservancy during the growing season of 1991 and 1992. Over 7,000 specimens (either collected or seen in the field) were identified, representing 512 different species and 28 families. Forty-one of these we consider to be distinctive of the two fire- maintained communities principally under investigation, the longleaf pine savannas and flatwoods. An additional 14 species we consider distinctive of the pocosins that occur in close association with the savannas and flatwoods. Twenty nine species appear to be rare enough to be included on the list of elements monitored by the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (eight others in this category have been reported from one of these sites, the Green Swamp, but were not observed in this study). Two of the moths collected, Spartiniphaga carterae and Agrotis buchholzi, are currently candidates for federal listing as Threatened or Endangered species. Another species, Hemipachnobia s. subporphyrea, appears to be endemic to North Carolina and should also be considered for federal candidate status. With few exceptions, even the species that seem to be most closely associated with savannas and flatwoods show few direct defenses against fire, the primary force responsible for maintaining these communities. Instead, the majority of these insects probably survive within this region due to their ability to rapidly re-colonize recently burned areas from small, well-dispersed refugia.
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera, Noctuidae, Xyleninae)
    Zootaxa 3755 (2): 165–178 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2014 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3755.2.3 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:6E3EB860-21C2-4F44-816E-DCCDAB6ECB0D A revision of the genus Protarchanara Beck, 1999 with description of a new genus and three new species (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae, Xyleninae) ANTON V. VOLYNKIN1, 5, ALEXEJ YU. MATOV2, PÉTER GYULAI3 & GOTTFRIED BEHOUNEK4 1Altai State University, Lenina str., 61, RF-656000, Barnaul, Russia; Tigirek State Natural Reserve, office 42, Nikitina str. 111, RF- 656043, Barnaul, Russia. E-mail: [email protected] 2Zoological Institute RAS, Universitetskaja emb. 1, RF-199034, Saint-Petersburg, Russia. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] 3H-3530 Miskolc, Mélyvölgy 13/A, Hungary. E-mail: [email protected] 4Sudetenstrasse 6, В-85567 Graphing bei München, Germany. E-mail: [email protected] 5Corresponding author Abstract The genus Protarchanara Beck, 1999 is revised. The new genus Hydredes gen. n. (type species Hydredes yakobsoni sp. n.) is described. Three new species, Hydredes yakobsoni sp. n., H. shchetkini sp. n. and Protarchanara mythimnoida sp. n. are described from Central Asia. Two species, Arenostola delattini Wiltshire, 1953 and Hydraecia praecipua Hacker & Nekrasov, 2001 are transferred to the genus Hydredes gen. n. Protarchanara brevilinea impudica (Staudinger, 1892) stat. n. is upgraded to subspecific level. Lectotypes for Namangana contumax Püngeler, 1902, Sidemia (Luperina) johni Püngeler, 1914 and Nonagria impudica Staudinger, 1892 are designated. The adults and male and female genitalia are il- lustrated.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Characteristics of Orthonama Obstipata (Fabricius, 1794) (Lepidoptera: Geometridae), an Emerging Defoliator of Mint (Mentha Spicata L., 1753) in Morocco
    Mor. J. Agri. Sci. 2 (3): 119-129, September 2021 119 Biological characteristics of Orthonama obstipata (Fabricius, 1794) (Lepidoptera: Geometridae), an emerging defoliator of mint (Mentha spicata L., 1753) in Morocco Chahrazad EL ANBRI1, Taoufik EDDAYA2, Ahmed BOUGHDAD3, Patrick CHAIMBAULT4, Abdelhamid ZAÏD1 Abstract The looper caterpillar, O. obstipata is one of the defoliator species of cultivated mint 1 Faculty of Sciences, Moulay Ismail in Morocco. Its identification and its biology constitute the preliminary step for the University, Meknes, Morocco development of a program aiming at its integrated management. The larvae were col- 2 Institute of Horticultural Special- lected from a plot of mint grown in a region of northern central Morocco, and reared ized Technicians,Meknes, Morocco in the laboratory. The identification of the species was based on comparing the male 3 Plant and Environment Protection aedeagus and the female spermatheca to the reference slides. In this study, the elements Department, National School of Agriculture, Meknes, Morocco of biology and morphological characteristics of the different ecophases ofO. obstipata are clarified and discussed. The life cycle of the species, from egg to egg, is completed 4 University of Lorraine, LCP- A2MC, Metz, France in 31.3 ± 2.16 days. The emergence occurs linearly in time after the 27th and 28th days of oviposition according the sex. The sex ratio (Male/Female) is 0.88:1. The fecundity * Corresponding author of the females is positively correlated with their lifespan. Females have an average fe- [email protected] cundity of 210 eggs and a fertility rate of 97%. Adults live on average 22.0 ± 6.3 days.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey of the Lepidoptera Fauna in Birch Mountains Wildland Provincial Park
    Survey of the Lepidoptera Fauna in Birch Mountains Wildland Provincial Park Platarctia parthenos Photo: D. Vujnovic Prepared for: Alberta Natural Heritage Information Centre, Parks and Protected Areas Division, Alberta Community Development Prepared by: Doug Macaulay and Greg Pohl Alberta Lepidopterists' Guild May 10, 2005 Figure 1. Doug Macaulay and Gerald Hilchie walking on a cutline near site 26. (Photo by Stacy Macaulay) Figure 2. Stacey Macaulay crossing a beaver dam at site 33. (Photo by Doug Macaulay) I TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................... 1 METHODS .............................................................................................................................. 1 RESULTS ................................................................................................................................ 3 DISCUSSION .......................................................................................................................... 4 I. Factors affecting the Survey...........................................................................................4 II. Taxa of particular interest.............................................................................................5 A. Butterflies:...................................................................................................................... 5 B. Macro-moths ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation and Management of Eastern Big-Eared Bats a Symposium
    Conservation and Management of Eastern Big-eared Bats A Symposium y Edited b Susan C. Loeb, Michael J. Lacki, and Darren A. Miller U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Southern Research Station General Technical Report SRS-145 DISCLAIMER The use of trade or firm names in this publication is for reader information and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture of any product or service. Papers published in these proceedings were submitted by authors in electronic media. Some editing was done to ensure a consistent format. Authors are responsible for content and accuracy of their individual papers and the quality of illustrative materials. Cover photos: Large photo: Craig W. Stihler; small left photo: Joseph S. Johnson; small middle photo: Craig W. Stihler; small right photo: Matthew J. Clement. December 2011 Southern Research Station 200 W.T. Weaver Blvd. Asheville, NC 28804 Conservation and Management of Eastern Big-eared Bats: A Symposium Athens, Georgia March 9–10, 2010 Edited by: Susan C. Loeb U.S Department of Agriculture Forest Service Southern Research Station Michael J. Lacki University of Kentucky Darren A. Miller Weyerhaeuser NR Company Sponsored by: Forest Service Bat Conservation International National Council for Air and Stream Improvement (NCASI) Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources Offield Family Foundation ContEntS Preface . v Conservation and Management of Eastern Big-Eared Bats: An Introduction . 1 Susan C. Loeb, Michael J. Lacki, and Darren A. Miller Distribution and Status of Eastern Big-eared Bats (Corynorhinus Spp .) . 13 Mylea L. Bayless, Mary Kay Clark, Richard C. Stark, Barbara S.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Assessment for the Kansan Spikerush Leafhopper (Dorydiella Kansana Beamer)
    Conservation Assessment For The Kansan spikerush leafhopper (Dorydiella kansana Beamer) USDA Forest Service, Eastern Region January 11, 2005 James Bess OTIS Enterprises 13501 south 750 west Wanatah, Indiana 46390 This document is undergoing peer review, comments welcome This Conservation Assessment was prepared to compile the published and unpublished information on the subject taxon or community; or this document was prepared by another organization and provides information to serve as a Conservation Assessment for the Eastern Region of the Forest Service. It does not represent a management decision by the U.S. Forest Service. Though the best scientific information available was used and subject experts were consulted in preparation of this document, it is expected that new information will arise. In the spirit of continuous learning and adaptive management, if you have information that will assist in conserving the subject taxon, please contact the Eastern Region of the Forest Service - Threatened and Endangered Species Program at 310 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 580 Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53203. TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................ 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS............................................................................................................ 1 NOMENCLATURE AND TAXONOMY ..................................................................................... 1 DESCRIPTION OF SPECIES.......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Survey of Lepidoptera of the Wainwright Dunes Ecological Reserve
    SURVEY OF LEPIDOPTERA OF THE WAINWRIGHT DUNES ECOLOGICAL RESERVE Alberta Species at Risk Report No. 159 SURVEY OF LEPIDOPTERA OF THE WAINWRIGHT DUNES ECOLOGICAL RESERVE Doug Macaulay Alberta Species at Risk Report No.159 Project Partners: i ISBN 978-1-4601-3449-8 ISSN 1496-7146 Photo: Doug Macaulay of Pale Yellow Dune Moth ( Copablepharon grandis ) For copies of this report, visit our website at: http://www.aep.gov.ab.ca/fw/speciesatrisk/index.html This publication may be cited as: Macaulay, A. D. 2016. Survey of Lepidoptera of the Wainwright Dunes Ecological Reserve. Alberta Species at Risk Report No.159. Alberta Environment and Parks, Edmonton, AB. 31 pp. ii DISCLAIMER The views and opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the policies of the Department or the Alberta Government. iii Table of Contents ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................... vi EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................... vi 1.0 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 STUDY AREA ............................................................................................................. 2 3.0 METHODS ................................................................................................................... 6 4.0 RESULTS ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.New and Interesting Portuguese Lepidoptera Records from 2007 (Insecta: Lepidoptera)
    SHILAP Revista de Lepidopterología ISSN: 0300-5267 [email protected] Sociedad Hispano-Luso-Americana de Lepidopterología España Corley, M. F. V.; Marabuto, E.; Maravalhas, E.; Pires, P.; Cardoso, J. P. New and interesting Portuguese Lepidoptera records from 2007 (Insecta: Lepidoptera) SHILAP Revista de Lepidopterología, vol. 36, núm. 143, septiembre, 2008, pp. 283-300 Sociedad Hispano-Luso-Americana de Lepidopterología Madrid, España Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=45512164002 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative 283-300 New and interesting Po 4/9/08 17:37 Página 283 SHILAP Revta. lepid., 36 (143), septiembre 2008: 283-300 CODEN: SRLPEF ISSN:0300-5267 New and interesting Portuguese Lepidoptera records from 2007 (Insecta: Lepidoptera) M. F. V. Corley, E. Marabuto, E. Maravalhas, P. Pires & J. P. Cardoso Abstract 38 species are added to the Portuguese Lepidoptera fauna and two species deleted, mainly as a result of fieldwork undertaken by the authors in the last year. In addition, second and third records for the country and new food-plant data for a number of species are included. A summary of papers published in 2007 affecting the Portuguese fauna is included. KEY WORDS: Insecta, Lepidoptera, geographical distribution, Portugal. Novos e interessantes registos portugueses de Lepidoptera em 2007 (Insecta: Lepidoptera) Resumo Como resultado do trabalho de campo desenvolvido pelos autores principalmente no ano de 2007, são adicionadas 38 espécies de Lepidoptera para a fauna de Portugal e duas são retiradas.
    [Show full text]
  • Zoogeography of the Holarctic Species of the Noctuidae (Lepidoptera): Importance of the Bering Ian Refuge
    © Entomologica Fennica. 8.XI.l991 Zoogeography of the Holarctic species of the Noctuidae (Lepidoptera): importance of the Bering ian refuge Kauri Mikkola, J, D. Lafontaine & V. S. Kononenko Mikkola, K., Lafontaine, J.D. & Kononenko, V. S. 1991 : Zoogeography of the Holarctic species of the Noctuidae (Lepidoptera): importance of the Beringian refuge. - En to mol. Fennica 2: 157- 173. As a result of published and unpublished revisionary work, literature compi­ lation and expeditions to the Beringian area, 98 species of the Noctuidae are listed as Holarctic and grouped according to their taxonomic and distributional history. Of the 44 species considered to be "naturall y" Holarctic before this study, 27 (61 %) are confirmed as Holarctic; 16 species are added on account of range extensions and 29 because of changes in their taxonomic status; 17 taxa are deleted from the Holarctic list. This brings the total of the group to 72 species. Thirteen species are considered to be introduced by man from Europe, a further eight to have been transported by man in the subtropical areas, and five migrant species, three of them of Neotropical origin, may have been assisted by man. The m~jority of the "naturally" Holarctic species are associated with tundra habitats. The species of dry tundra are frequently endemic to Beringia. In the taiga zone, most Holarctic connections consist of Palaearctic/ Nearctic species pairs. The proportion ofHolarctic species decreases from 100 % in the High Arctic to between 40 and 75 % in Beringia and the northern taiga zone, and from between 10 and 20 % in Newfoundland and Finland to between 2 and 4 % in southern Ontario, Central Europe, Spain and Primorye.
    [Show full text]
  • MOTHS and BUTTERFLIES LEPIDOPTERA DISTRIBUTION DATA SOURCES (LEPIDOPTERA) * Detailed Distributional Information Has Been J.D
    MOTHS AND BUTTERFLIES LEPIDOPTERA DISTRIBUTION DATA SOURCES (LEPIDOPTERA) * Detailed distributional information has been J.D. Lafontaine published for only a few groups of Lepidoptera in western Biological Resources Program, Agriculture and Agri-food Canada. Scott (1986) gives good distribution maps for Canada butterflies in North America but these are generalized shade Central Experimental Farm Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0C6 maps that give no detail within the Montane Cordillera Ecozone. A series of memoirs on the Inchworms (family and Geometridae) of Canada by McGuffin (1967, 1972, 1977, 1981, 1987) and Bolte (1990) cover about 3/4 of the Canadian J.T. Troubridge fauna and include dot maps for most species. A long term project on the “Forest Lepidoptera of Canada” resulted in a Pacific Agri-Food Research Centre (Agassiz) four volume series on Lepidoptera that feed on trees in Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Canada and these also give dot maps for most species Box 1000, Agassiz, B.C. V0M 1A0 (McGugan, 1958; Prentice, 1962, 1963, 1965). Dot maps for three groups of Cutworm Moths (Family Noctuidae): the subfamily Plusiinae (Lafontaine and Poole, 1991), the subfamilies Cuculliinae and Psaphidinae (Poole, 1995), and ABSTRACT the tribe Noctuini (subfamily Noctuinae) (Lafontaine, 1998) have also been published. Most fascicles in The Moths of The Montane Cordillera Ecozone of British Columbia America North of Mexico series (e.g. Ferguson, 1971-72, and southwestern Alberta supports a diverse fauna with over 1978; Franclemont, 1973; Hodges, 1971, 1986; Lafontaine, 2,000 species of butterflies and moths (Order Lepidoptera) 1987; Munroe, 1972-74, 1976; Neunzig, 1986, 1990, 1997) recorded to date.
    [Show full text]