DOCSLIB.ORG

Engineers Who Get Their Hands Dirty

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Engineers Who Get Their Hands Dirty Engineers Who Get Their Hands Dirty Mission Statement Our mission here at Dirty Suit Construction is to produce high quality work, no matter how small or how large of a project, while offering competitive pricing, great communication, and a safe work environment for all employees. We at Dirty Suit Construction value our quality reputation and strive to please all parties, whether it be project owner, subcontractors, suppliers, or consultants. All parties are treated with high integrity and respect to help insure lifelong relations and business. Greenfield Bridge Replacement Bridge Name: Beachwood Blvd. Bridge Originally constructed in 1921 466’ total length: 274’ main span Traffic conditions: Current A.D.T: 12,800 Design Year A.D.T: 16,100 Designer estimated completion: September 5th, 2017 Designer estimated build cost: $15-$20 million Greenfield Bridge Replacement Owner: City Of Pittsburgh Pennsylvania Department of Transportation BMS No.: 02 7301 0000 3039 Designer: HDR Engineering, INC. 11 Stanwix St, Suite 800 Pittsburgh, Pa 15222 Greenfield Bridge Replacement General Contractor: Dirty Suit Construction 115 Federal St. Pittsburgh Pa, 15213 Meet Our Construction Management Team: Derrick Lubomski (Project Manager) Ryan Shaffer Adrienne Sciarretti Eric Danko Jack Ozaroff Kevin Link Paige Lumley OAKLAND Limits of Work GREENFIELD Community Impact Noise Control Traffic / Detour Air Quality Safety Consideration Access to Schenley Health / Fitness Stimulates local economy Traffic Control Plan East Detour Route I-376 EAST EXIT 72A -> FORBES AVE BATES STREET -> HALKET ST - > FORBES AVE Traffic Control Plan East Detour Route FORBES -> S. BELLEFIELD AVE -> FIFTH AVENUE PENN AVENUE -> ENTRANCE I-376 EAST - WILKINSBURG (PA8 NORTH) INTERCHANGE Traffic Control Plan Closure from Squirrel Hill Interchange Ramp To Edgewood / Swissvale Interchange Murray Ave -> Wilkins Ave -> Penn Ave -> I-376 East Traffic Control Plan West Detour Route EXIT 78B WILKINSBURG (PA8 NORTH) CLOSURE OF EDGEWOOD / SWISSVALE INTERCHANGE PENN AVE -> FIFTH AVE -> FORBES AVE ->BATES STREET -> I - 376W Traffic Control Plan Closure from Squirrel Hill Interchange Ramps To Forbes Ave / Oakland Interchange BEECHWOOD BLVD FOWARD ST-> MURRAY AVE -> FORBES-> BATES STREET -> I - 376W Traffic Control Plan ● Signs : Speed Limit, Road Closed, Work Zone, Detour, End Road Work ● Type B Flashers ● Type III Barricades ● Channelizing Devices (Vertical Panels) ● Road Markers ● Shadow Vehicles ● Concrete Barriers (PennDOT) Quality Management Plan ● Document Change Control ○ version #, date of issue, author(s), description of change ● Quality Policy ● Quality Objectives ● Management Organization ● Quality & Document Control ● Construction Inspection Communication Plan ● Communication is essential for a project to be successful. There are multiple positions involved including subs, architects, engineers and owner(s). ● Meetings (weekly) -project goal priorities will change frequently ● Proper logs, change orders and other documentation such as electronic & hard memorandums / reports determine how smoothly a project can run ● Use methods such as P6, email, & phone calls ● Not only does the internal circle of the project need to be in healthy communication with each other, but also the outsiders involved (stakeholders) ● Different groups of people will be impacted by the project; it is important to keep them updated so that their everyday lives will not be negatively affected ○ Noise & traffic are typically the main issues Communication Plan Public Information ● Information Card handed out at public meetings (Oakland Transportation Management Assoc.) ● Project Description ● Bridge Construction Dates -total duration of ~24 mo. ○ month #1: bridge closes to public & contractor begins physical work ○ month #3: bridge implosion (including part time closure of I-376 Parkway East) ○ month #4 & on: construction of bridge ● Pedestrian traffic restricted from bridge - pedestrian/bicycle detour route implemented ● General traffic detoured around bridge with the aid of a posted detour * project updates, detailed traffic detours and Q&A can be found on the up-to-date website* Project Partners Foundations Overview: Foundations ● South Side Open Cut Excavation ● OSHA Standard 1926 Subpart P ○ Soil Type C: 1.5:1 max allowable slope ● Based on Design Drawings ○ 1.95:1 slope Foundations • Lengths developed using provided core borings • Micropile Assembly: • #28 All-Thread Reinforcement • Steel Casing • Steel Plate • Hex Nut & Washer • Assumed production rate from Amelie Construction: 3-4 per day Location Total Average Average Verification Production Length Length Micropiles Quantity (Battered) (Vertical) (ft.) (ft.) Abutment 1 46 59 55 2 South Thrust 60 66 72 1 Blocks North Thrust 60 37 47 1 Blocks Foundations Drill Rig: Comacchio MC-22 High-Tech Line Encountered issues with drilling Bench EL. Bench EL. 1 882.36 1 882.36 2 877.44 2 877.44 3 872.51 3 872.51 4 867.59 4 867.59 5 862.66 5 862.66 6 857.74 6 857.74 Foundations Control of Heat of Hydration Element with least dimension greater than or equal to 6 ft ◦ South Thrust Block Footers ◦ North Thrust Block Footers ◦ South Thrust Blocks ◦ North Thrust Blocks Reduce cracking due to high temperature and uneven concrete cooling Thrust Block Footer Formwork Foundations Responsible for stability of all excavated slopes and embankments South end: Greenfield side ◦ Open cut excavation North end: Schenley side ◦ Earth-retaining structure Foundations ● Pittsburgh Redbeds ○ Clay minerals organized randomly ○ Water becomes trapped ■ Causes excessive pore pressure ○ Introducing additional water causes claystones to push themselves apart Foundations Temporary Retaining Wall Load ● Type of retaining structure: Transfer Soil Nail Wall ○ Quick construction ○ Logical selection ■ Same drill as micropiles Soil Nail Foundations SNW Wall Location North Thrust Block Foundation Abutment 2 Foundation Soil Nail Wall Foundations Preliminary Design ● Wall Length: 70 feet ● Wall Height: 15 feet ● Nail Length: 12 feet ● Nail Inclination: 15 degrees ● Nail Size: No. 10 Bar ● Nail Spacing: 5 feet ○ Horizontal & Vertical Directions ● 6 Inch Shotcrete Facing ● Vertical Wall Foundations Final Design ● Alterations to initial design: ○ Wall Height: 20 feet ○ Nail Length: 20 feet ○ Nail Inclination: 20 degrees ○ 8 Inch Shotcrete Facing ○ Wall Batter: 10 degrees *Wall modeled in FHWA SNAP-2 Software Foundations SNW Wall Construction ● Construction Sequence ○ Excavate Lift ○ Drill Hole ○ Install Nail ○ Place Facing Substructure Overview: Piers & Abutments Abutments & Piers Abutments ◦ Total Concrete: 393 CY ◦ 4 Pours ◦ Bush Hammer & Rect. Cut Stone Finish Piers ◦ Total Concrete: 242 CY ◦ 3 Pours ◦ Bush Hammer Architectural Finish Abutment Wingwalls B C A D Abutment Wingwalls Mechanically Stabilized Earth Walls ● MSE Wall Components ○ Leveling pad ○ Straps ○ Precast Concrete Panels ○ Backfill ● Construction Sequence ○ Pour leveling pad ○ Erect 1st Row of Panels ○ Place Backfill ○ Place Layer of Geotextile Fabric ○ Install Reinforcement Straps Steel Erection Overview: Preliminary Steel Erection: Alternative 1 Preliminary Steel Erection: Alternative 1 Too Large of Moment Final Erection Sequence: 1) 2) 3) 4) Final Erection Sequence: 5) 6) 7) 8) Final Erection Sequence: 9) 10) 11) 12) Final Erection Sequence: 13) 14) 15) 16) Final Erection Sequence: 17) 18) Falsework Design: South Tower North Tower Wind Load Elevation Profile: Structure Analysis of Sequence: Load Cases Examined: 1) 1.4DL 2) 1.25DL + 1WL (T) + .5WL (L) Governing Load Case 3) 1.25DL + .5WL (T) + 1WL (L) 4) 1.25DL + .7WL (T) + .7WL (L) Structure Analysis of Sequence: Structure Analysis of Sequence: Structure Analysis of Sequence: Structure Analysis of Sequence: Structure Analysis of Sequence: Steel Erection- Crane Layout Show crane layouts/logistics-Derrick/Ry Site Logistics Material Laydown~ 13,713 SF Unloading/ Loading~ 4,007 SF Loose Material Stockpile~ 3,522 SF Deck Overview: Deck 53’ - 9 ¾” Width (Out-To-Out) 10’ width Sidewalk 16” thick Sidewalk Deck 8” thick 1” clearance from bottom for rebar 2.5” clearance from top for rebar TYPICAL SECTION Deck Pour Specs CONCRETE WATER CURING SPECS AAAP: Deck Slab, Concrete End Diaphragms AAAP: 14 days AA: Sidewalk, Abutment / Back walls, Abutment AA: 7 days Integral drain through, Approach Slabs, Moment Slabs, Sleeper Slabs High Early Strength: Fillers (Dowel Bars) High Early Strength: 3 days Immediately after water curing is done & A reduction in shrinkage potential that would help reduce cracking after surface film of water has Improvement in workability and easier to finish allowing contractors disappeared, apply curing compound to to provide a finish that would be more durable and long lasting bridge approach slabs. Deck Setup Total Duration: 25 days Deck MAIN DECK POUR SEQUENCE 1 & 2 Pour End Diaphragms at Abutments below construction joints 3 & 4 Pour Approaches 5 Pour main portion over arch, placement must remain plastic 6 & 7 Pour Block Outs over Abutments Concrete: PennDOT AAAP Quantity: 785 CY Greenfield Side Schenley Side SUBCONTRACTORS / PLANTS Essroc Ready Mix – for concrete / trucks 2220 2nd Avenue Pittsburgh, PA 15219-3107 412.431.6001 MAIN DECK POUR CREW Howard Pumping – used for pumps and equipment ● 1. Bidwell Operator 701 Millers Run Road Cuddy, PA 15031 ● 1. Pump operator 412.257.1800 ● 1 laborer with hose DOT Diamond Core Drilling - Bridge Deck Grooving ● 1. Supervisor / Foreman 780 Sugar Lane ● 2 laborers with vibrators Elyria, Ohio 44035 ● 4 Laborers with lutes Peter
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Greenfield Neighborhood of Pittsburgh 1977
    An Atlas of the Greenfield Neighborhood of Pittsburgh 1977 GREENFIELD F 1209-0, Cathedral of Learning University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh, Pennsylyania 15260 Phone: (412) 624-3465 PITTSBURGH NEIGHBORHOOD ATLAS GOVERNING BOARD stAFF ROGER AHLBRANDT, JR. Unlve,.itv of Pltt.bu.""'. Sehool of Soel,' WOfk Ch,lrperlon Wendell D. Jordan (East Liberty-Lemington-Lincoln) JAMES VALLAS Shadysld' Margaret K. Charny (Squirrel Hill) VIC:I-Ch,I,pI"on Julta Whitener (Mexican War Streets) BARBARA KEU_ Y Pe.. y-Hllltop Millofred Russell (Homestead. Pa.) Secretary Gerald S. Oswalt (Schenley Heights) TERRY WOODCOCK Squirrel Hili Katherine Knorr (East Liberty) T ....u'et John Zingaro (Shadyside) RICHARD ARMSTEAD Hitt Dlnricl Dan Baskin JOSEPH BORKOWSKI Vicky Leap Law .rlnelvllli DANIEL CHAPPELL Howard Williams Hili Dlu.kt Ronald Madzy MARY COYNE We., End Tony Gary JIM CUNNINGHAM Mary Shea Shedy,lde MARY LOU DANIEL Wen End SUPPORTIVE INSTITUTIONS JESE DEL GRE Hili OI,U1ct Pittsburgh Neighborhood Alliance WIU.1AM P. GALLAGHER Greenfield Center for Urban Research of the Univ. of Pgh. MARY HALL School of Social Work of the Univ. of Pgh. Squirrel Hili ROSE JEWELL Architect Workshop Shady,ldl City Council of the City of Pgh. GABOR KISH Allegheny County Department of Elections Elliott ROBERT "BLUE" MARTIN ACTION-Housing. Inc. HI.elwood Department of City Planning of the City of Pgh. THOMAS MURPHY "erry Hilltop Southwestern Penna. Regional Planning Commission EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR ACTION-Vista (Volunteers in Service to America) WENDELL D . JOADAN Valley View Presbyterian Church AGENCIES Action-Houilng, Inc. U.S. BurNu of thl Cln.... FUNDING SOURCES Clrn.gI.Mellon Unlwl,...lty Chtlstlln Auoclat.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Pittsburgh Neighborhood Profiles Census 2010 Summary File 1 (Sf1) Data
    CITY OF PITTSBURGH NEIGHBORHOOD PROFILES CENSUS 2010 SUMMARY FILE 1 (SF1) DATA PROGRAM IN URBAN AND REGIONAL ANALYSIS UNIVERSITY CENTER FOR SOCIAL AND URBAN RESEARCH UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH JULY 2011 www.ucsur.pitt.edu About the University Center for Social and Urban Research (UCSUR) The University Center for Social and Urban Research (UCSUR) was established in 1972 to serve as a resource for researchers and educators interested in the basic and applied social and behavioral sciences. As a hub for interdisciplinary research and collaboration, UCSUR promotes a research agenda focused on the social, economic and health issues most relevant to our society. UCSUR maintains a permanent research infrastructure available to faculty and the community with the capacity to: (1) conduct all types of survey research, including complex web surveys; (2) carry out regional econometric modeling; (3) analyze qualitative data using state‐of‐the‐art computer methods, including web‐based studies; (4) obtain, format, and analyze spatial data; (5) acquire, manage, and analyze large secondary and administrative data sets including Census data; and (6) design and carry out descriptive, evaluation, and intervention studies. UCSUR plays a critical role in the development of new research projects through consultation with faculty investigators. The long‐term goals of UCSUR fall into three broad domains: (1) provide state‐of‐the‐art research and support services for investigators interested in interdisciplinary research in the behavioral, social, and clinical sciences; (2) develop nationally recognized research programs within the Center in a few selected areas; and (3) support the teaching mission of the University through graduate student, post‐ doctoral, and junior faculty mentoring, teaching courses on research methods in the social sciences, and providing research internships to undergraduate and graduate students.
    [Show full text]
  • Mellon Park City of Pittsburgh Historic Landmark Nomination
    Mellon Park City of Pittsburgh Historic Landmark Nomination Prepared by Preservation Pittsburgh for Friends of Mellon Park 412.256.8755 1501 Reedsdale St., Suite 5003 September, 2020. Pittsburgh, PA 15233 www.preservationpgh.org HISTORIC REVIEW COMMISSION Division of Development Administration and Review City of Pittsburgh, Department of City Planning 200 Ross Street, Third Floor Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15219 INDIVIDUAL PROPERTY HISTORIC NOMINATION FORM Fee Schedule HRC Staff Use Only Please make check payable to Treasurer, City of Pittsburgh Date Received: .................................................. Individual Landmark Nomination: $100.00 Parcel No.: ........................................................ District Nomination: $250.00 Ward: ................................................................ Zoning Classification: ....................................... 1. HISTORIC NAME OF PROPERTY: Bldg. Inspector: ................................................. Council District: ................................................ Mellon Park 2. CURRENT NAME OF PROPERTY: Mellon Park 3. LOCATION a. Street: 1047 Shady Ave. b. City, State, Zip Code: Pittsburgh, Pa. 15232 c. Neighborhood: Shadyside/Point Breeze 4. OWNERSHIP d. Owner(s): City of Pittsburgh e. Street: 414 Grant St. f. City, State, Zip Code: Pittsburgh, Pa. 15219 Phone: (412) 255-2626 5. CLASSIFICATION AND USE – Check all that apply Type Ownership Current Use: Structure Private – home Park District Private – other Site Public – government Object Public - other Place of religious worship 1 6. NOMINATED BY: a. Name: Elizabeth Seamons for Friends of Mellon Park & Matthew Falcone of Preservation Pittsburgh b. Street: 1501 Reedsdale St. #5003 c. City, State, Zip: Pittsburgh, Pa. 15233 d. Phone: (412) 417-5910 Email: [email protected] 7. DESCRIPTION Provide a narrative description of the structure, district, site, or object. If it has been altered over time, indicate the date(s) and nature of the alteration(s). (Attach additional pages as needed) If Known: a.
    [Show full text]
  • Moved to Lawrenceville, and a Survey of Those Having Moved Away
    Executive Summary This study was conducted to provide community leaders with an understanding of the factors driving recent change in Pittsburgh’s Lawrenceville neighborhood. Two surveys were conducted: a survey of those who have recently moved to Lawrenceville, and a survey of those having moved away. The mail surveys were conducted by the University Center for Social and Urban Research (UCSUR) at the University of Pittsburgh in the summer of 2011. New resident survey About 60 percent of new residents moved from a different address in the City of Pittsburgh, with an additional 20 percent coming from a Pittsburgh suburb. The most- common origin communities included Lawrenceville and other nearby neighborhoods in the East End. New Lawrenceville residents also looked for housing in Bloomfield, Shadyside, Friendship, Squirrel Hill, the South Side, and Highland Park. The most-popular reasons for moving to Lawrenceville included the cost of living, convenience to work, school, friends, or family, and a walkable business district. Many new residents become exposed to the neighborhood through community events or neighborhood institutions. Upper Lawrenceville was viewed differently by survey respondents in comparison to Lower and Central Lawrenceville. Just under half of new residents included Upper Lawrenceville in their housing search. o Those who excluded Upper Lawrenceville expressed concerns over safety, blight, and the more-distant and isolated location o Those that included Upper Lawrenceville in their search did so due to its affordability and a perception of the neighborhood as up-and-coming. Former resident survey Nearly half of the former residents responding to the survey moved to a Pittsburgh suburb and one-third stayed in the City.
    [Show full text]
  • Greenfield Towship Comprehensive Plan
    GREENFIELD TOWSHIP COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PREPARED BY THE GREENFIELD TOWNSHIP OFFICIALS AND THE ERIE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING 2002 GREENFIELD TOWNSHIP RESOLUTION NO. 2002- 14 WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Greenfield Township have the power to adopt and amend the Greenfield Township Comprehensive Plan as a whole or in parts; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Greenfield Township desire to adopt the June 2002 version of the proposed Comprehensive Plan for Greenfield Township as a whole; and II WHEREAS, pursuant to 53 P.S. $ 10302: A. The Greenfield Township Planning Commission has held at least one public meeting I pursuant to public notice before forwarding the proposed June 2002 version of the Comprehensive Plan to the Board of Supervisors of Greenfield Township; and I B. In reviewing the proposed June 2002 version of the Comprehensive Plan, the Board of Supervisors have considered the review comments ofthe County Planning Agency, the contiguous municipalities and the school district, as well as the public meeting comments and the I recommendations of the Greenfield Township Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Greenfield Township have held two public hearings I pursuant to public notice concerning the proposed June 2002 version of the Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, there have not been any substantial revisions to the proposed June 2002 version of the Comprehensive Plan following the public hearings. NOW, THEREFORE, this wdayof ~C&~QQX,2002, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of the Township of Greenfield, in the County of Erie and Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, as follows: 1. Greenfield Township, Erie County, Pennsylvania does hereby adopt the proposed June 2002 version of the Comprehensive Plan as a whole as the Comprehensive Plan for Greenfield Township.
    [Show full text]
  • November 2019
    November 2019 AND ACTION! CONSTRUCTION BEGINS ON STORMWATER PROJECTS IN FOUR MILE RUN. IN THIS ISSUE: 1 Four Mile Run Early Action Projects 2 RAW Talk 3 PWSA in the Community 5 PWSA in the News 6 Team PWSA 8 Engineering & Construction 9 Water Wise 11 PWSA Connect COMING UP: Pictured: Four Mile Run early action project locations. 2019 Board Meetings In early December we will begin On the surface, the channels The Four Mile Run Stormwater December 20 the construction of two green will resemble shallow ditches project is a tremendous infrastructure projects that will with sides sloping towards undertaking by PWSA, City 2020 Board Meetings help to manage stormwater the center. At the bottom, a of Pittsburgh, and Pittsburgh January 24 within Four Mile Run, which rocky bed will help slow down Parks Conservancy to manage encompasses Schenley the flow of water, and an stormwater. February 28 Park and several Pittsburgh underground storage system March 27 The construction of the neighborhoods including will hold back excess rainwater. drainage channels is one April 24 Greenfield, Hazelwood, The channels will provide a part of a much larger project. May 22 Oakland, Squirrel Hill and the pathway where stormwater Other projects include the Run. June 26 can lose momentum and will reconstruction of Panther July 26 These projects, two engineered reduce the amount entering Hollow Lake, regrading of No August Meeting drainage channels, are being the combined sewer system Junction Hollow Valley, and September 25 built in Schenley Park along during a storm. They will help restoring an outfall pipe along Overlook Drive and next to to capture rainwater, reduce the Monongahela river.
    [Show full text]
  • Earliest Settlements in the Fifteenth Ward of the City of the Indians
    188 Early Settlements in the Fifteenth Ward of Pittsburgh Earliest Settlements in the Fifteenth Ward of the City of Pittsburgh. The Indians were the first occupants and land owners in Western Pennsylvania. They left numerous signs of their presence in what is now the Fifteenth Ward of the cityof Pittsburgh. They had a well-travelled trail along the right bank of the Monongahela at a very early day, and it was over this trail that the French and Indians passed, when they went out from Fort Duquesne, in 1755, and at- tacked and defeated General Braddock and his troops at the Battle of the Monongahela. After the English occupation, this trail became the Braddock's Field public road, and as such is plainly marked on the map of Pittsburgh, in 1795. At the head of Mansion Street, Glenwood, was an an- cient burying ground of that aboriginal tribe known as the Mound Builders. It included several mounds, the largest being about fifteen feet inheight. Their tops were rounded, and the mounds, originally, were heaped with stones, it being the Indian custom to add more stones at each visit. In the seventies, when Second Avenue was paved through the Fifteenth Ward for the first time, James McKibben, who had the contract for grading this street, hauled stones for an entire winter from these old mounds, and used them for ballast. The enveloping cover of stones being removed, persons began exploring the mounds, searching for relics, and they were soon destroyed. No trace of them now re- mains. The cleared spots back in the woods near these mounds were known to the early white settlers as the "Old Fields." Fine forests originally covered this district.
    [Show full text]
  • Hazelwood Green Long Range Transportation Plan December 2019 Acknowledgements
    Hazelwood Green Long Range Transportation Plan December 2019 Acknowledgements Client Almono LP Project Manager / Hazelwood Green Mobility Consultant ReMake Group Transportation Planning Consultant Nelson \ Nygaard Thank you to all Stakeholder and Task Force members that participated throughout this plan process. Cover photograph by: James Knox (Fall 2017), courtesy of Almono LP Acknowledgements Table of Contents PREFACE . I 1 INTRODUCTION . 1 2 MOBILITY TODAY & HAZELWOOD GREEN DEVELOPMENT . 5 Hazelwood Green . 11 3 PLANNING FOR 2040 . 17 Vision to Reality . 17 Using the Hazelwood Green LRTP . 17 Existing and Potential Financing . 18 Priority Project Recommendations . 19 Implementation Matrix . 20 Downtown to Hazelwood Green and the Greater Mon Valley . 22 Oakland to Hazelwood Green and the Greater Mon Valley . 28 Greenfield Avenue Intersection: A Neighborhood Gateway . 32 Monitor, Mange, and Incentivize Non-SOV Modes of Transportation . 34 Pittsburgh Innovation Districts by Water Ferry . 38 Bicycle and Pedestrian Network Improvements . .40 A APPENDIX A: PROJECT PROCESS AND TIMELINE . 48 Key Stakeholder Groups . 48 Planning Process . 49 Timeline . 50 Vision for Mobility and Access . 51 Goals . 51 B APPENDIX B: TRANSIT METHODOLOGY . 52 Capital Costs . 52 Operating Costs . 53 Ridership Estimates . 54 C APPENDIX C: PREVIOUS PLANNING EFFORTS AND KEY PLANS IN DEVELOPMENT . 56 D APPENDIX D: INNOVATION AND BEST PRACTICES IN TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS . 60 Enhancements to Rapid Transit . 61 First and Last Mile Connections . 62 Potential Aerial Solutions .. 62 Improvements to Bicycling Network and Facilities . 63 Emerging Mobility Options Including E-Assist Bikes and Scooters . 64 Long Range Transportation Plan PREFACE PREFACE The Hazelwood Green Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) describes a multimodal transportation network by recommending policies and projects that will: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Pittsburgh Legal Journal • 3
    Friday, November 15, 2019 Pittsburgh Legal Journal • 3 CR-0006615-19; Lorenza Pryor; Manu - Judge Anthony M. Mariani CR-0007254-19; Marcus R. Nichols; SA-0000168-19 ; Comm. of PA vs Ryan facture, Delivery, or Possession With Courtroom 316 Agg. Ind. Assault - Comp. Less Than 13 Andrew Godek; P-atty: Allegheny LEGAL ADS Intent to Manufacture or Deliver; ADA: CR-0006786-19; Kamal Bahadur Darjee; Years Old; ADA: Bruce Lee Castor III ; County District Attorney’s Office ; Todd Leroy Williams ; D-atty: Joshua DUI: Highest Rte of Alc (BAC .16+) 4th D-atty: Tyler Wils Deluco D-atty: Patrick J. Thomassey Russell Roberts Off & Sub; ADA: Michelle Hope Sheriff’s Sale SA-0000379-19 ; Comm. of PA vs William P. Mullen, Sheriff CR-0006662-19; Lorenza Pryor; Shefton ; D-atty: Ronald Makoski Kendrick M. Blackman; P-atty: Alleghe - Abstracts of properties taken in Possession Of Firearm Prohibited; Judge Jill E. Rangos Arbitration Trial ny County District Attorney’s Office execution upon the writs shown, at the numbers and terms shown, as the ADA: Franklin Thomas Stockdale Courtroom 327 SA-0000404-19 ; Comm. of PA vs Mal - Jr. ; D-atty: Joshua Russell Roberts CR-0001127-19; Julian Cole; Posses - List properties of the severally named com Alexander Graves; P-atty: Alleghe - defendants, owners or reputed owners and sion Of Firearm Prohibited; ADA: CR-0008157-19; Timothy Holden City-County Building ny County District Attorney’s Office to be sold by William P. Mullen, Sheriff of Smeltzer; Fail to Provide Accurate Regis - Steven McKee Liboski ; D-atty: Room 702 Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, Monday, 9:00 a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Pittsburgh's Gateway Communities
    Pittsburgh’s Gateway Communities Center for Economic Development Carnegie Mellon University Center for Economic Development 4516 Henry Street UTDC Suite 208 Pittsburgh, PA 15213 Phone: 412.268.9880 Fax: 412.268.9828 November 2003 www.smartpolicy.org Smart Policy for Innovative Regions 1 Pittsburgh’s Gateway Communities by Lena Andrews Pittsburgh has not been a destination for international immigration into the United States. Out of the 50 largest metropolitan areas, Pittsburgh has a lower share of foreign residents than all cities except for Cincinnati. For a region that is losing people, in a time when much population growth is fueled by international immigration, we must make Pittsburgh a destination. It is possible for Midwestern cities to attract foreign immigration; Cleveland, Minneapolis, and St. Louis are similar to Pittsburgh in many ways but they have larger foreign communities. The dominant pattern of foreign immigration is the clustering of ethnic groups around certain neighborhoods. People tend to move to places where they feel comfortable. Certain communities serve as gateways, welcoming new migrants into a city. The existence and operation of these gateway communities can be a critical factor in making the city a destination for immigration. This report identifies Pittsburgh’s 1 gateway communities for several groups of immigrants. 1 This report focuses on the city of Pittsburgh because it accounts for 30% of the region’s foreign population compared to 14% of the total regional population. Nine of the ten census tracts in the metropolitan area with the largest foreign populations are located in the city of Pittsburgh. Future reports will examine foreign communities throughout the metropolitan area.
    [Show full text]
  • Album Recorded in Hazelwood Makes National, International Noise
    Non-profit Organization U. S. Postage 5344 Second Avenue PAID Pittsburgh, PA Pittsburgh, PA 15207 Permit No. 5333 Volume 2, No. 9 September, 2014 PUBLISHED BY HAZELWOOD INITIATIVE, INC. 5344 SECOND AVENUE, PITTSBURGH, PA 15207 Album Recorded in Hazelwood Makes National, International Noise Some of the reviews have called it “a perfect Summer record,” while others have described it as fitting “be- tween San Franciscan AM pop, fuzzy sci-fi soundscapes and New Age- leaning placidity.” The album is “If You Take Your Magic Slow,” the latest release on vinyl and digital download from multi-instrumentalist Jennifer Baron, who fronts an outfit called The Garment District. Half of the album was recorded by Jennifer and husband/ bandmate Greg Langel at home, while the rest was recorded in Hazelwood at Front and back covers of the If You Take Your Magic Slow album. Greg Matecko’s Frankenstein Sound Laboratory. receiving all kinds of rave reviews lit- up on various websites and YouTube. Kind of a strange name for a studio, erally all over the world. Locally, Jen- He traded album cover art to the stu- isn’t it? nifer was also the cover girl and story dio owner in exchange for recording “Not really,” says Matecko. “Kind in the August 13 issue of Pittsburgh’s time, which only added fuel to the fire of appropriate. Most of the equipment City Paper, and received write ups in of wanting to learn the secrets of the is old bits and pieces of antiquated both Pittsburgh Magazine and the Post process. gear kind of stitched together.
    [Show full text]
  • Census 2000 City of Pittsburgh Neighborhood Rankings – November 2002 Ranked by Percent Population Age 25 and Over with Bachelors Degree Or Higher
    Census 2000 City of Pittsburgh Neighborhood Rankings – November 2002 Ranked by Percent Population Age 25 and over with Bachelors degree or higher 1 Squirrel Hill North 76.5% 46 Crafton Heights 14.1% 2 Shadyside 71.7% 47 Polish Hill 14.1% 3 Point Breeze 69.1% 48 New Homestead 13.5% 4 Regent Square 67.4% 49 Central Lawrenceville 12.9% 5 North Oakland 66.8% 50 Bon Air 12.1% 6 Squirrel Hill South 63.0% 51 Sheraden 12.1% 7 Allegheny West 55.3% 52 Perry South 11.8% 8 North Shore 55.1% 53 Hazelwood 11.7% 9 Highland Park 53.1% 54 Beltzhoover 11.3% 10 Central Oakland 45.1% 55 Crawford-Roberts 11.0% 11 Friendship 42.5% 56 Allentown 10.5% 12 Point Breeze North 35.0% 57 Lincoln-Larimer 10.4% 13 Strip District 34.2% 58 California Kurkbudle 10.3% 14 Allegheny Center 34.2% 59 Overbrook 10.3% 15 Swisshelm Park 33.6% 60 East Hills 10.3% 16 Banksville 32.9% 61 Carrick 10.3% 17 Stanton Heights 31.9% 62 Middle Hill 9.8% 18 Greenfield 29.9% 63 Garfield 9.7% 19 Duquesne Heights 29.5% 64 Troy Hill 9.7% 20 South Shore 27.9% 65 Spring Hill-CV 9.5% 21 Bloomfield 27.6% 66 Upper Lawrenceville 9.2% 22 South Oakland 27.3% 67 Homewood West 9.0% 23 Morningside 27.0% 68 Lincoln Place 8.8% 24 South Side Flats 25.2% 69 Larimer 8.5% 25 Mount Washington 24.3% 70 Homewood North 8.3% 26 Central Northside 24.1% 71 Knoxville 8.3% 27 West Oakland 23.1% 72 Fairywood 8.2% 28 Golden Triangle 22.9% 73 Arlington 7.9% 29 Oakwood 22.1% 74 Chartiers City 7.9% 30 Westwood 21.9% 75 Hays 7.8% 31 Brighton Heights 21.3% 76 Glen Hazel 7.5% 32 Perry North 21.0% 77 Elliot 7.4% 33 Upper Hill
    [Show full text]