Dlamini-Zuma and the African Union Commission

Leadership Issues in Africa No. 1 July 2012 A Huge Step for Women? Seventeen years after the United Nations Beijing conference on women, the ‘playing field’ in terms of Dlamini-Zuma and the equal access whether it is framed through education, the economy and most importantly social and cul- African Union Commission tural frameworks that reassert gendered hierarchies By Awino Okech1 have not been dismantled. However, in terms of advancing the discourse on women’s leadership we2 must begin to debunk the naturalised assumptions about how women and men I have watched and listened with interest at the ulula- conduct service. Universal claims about women are tions surrounding Nkosazana Dlamini-Zuma’s election invariably false and effectively normalise and privilege as the new head of the African Union (AU) commis- specific forms of femininity and in turn masculinity. sion. The ululations have been framed first as a gender I believe that we need to recognise that Dlamini-Zuma victory and then more broadly. I would like to urge represents multiple interests. Her gender is just one of caution to the growing voices hailing the power of the many identities she negotiates alongside being a women and the changes that will follow because we South African, a Zulu, a politician, a veteran of South now have the first woman at the helm of the African Africa’s liberation struggle and the list goes on. Her Union commission. Let me put the detractors rhetoric gender I dare say will not be primary determinant of to rest; I do not urge caution, because women are their her leadership scorecard if you will at the AU commission. own worst enemies. From a purely women’s move- To give Dlamini-Zuma’s leadership at the com- ment perspective, this is a victory to be celebrated, mission a fair chance we must nuance this gender primarily because the patriarchal nature of our socie- victory and engage the context of her candidature in ties makes such an achievement a significant milestone. order to make it work for ‘us’. Most immediately, we must re-engage the AU actively and re-write the silence Awino Okech is the outgoing director of Fahamu – Networks for Social Justice that characterised civil society organizations interaction Research Initiative – Tuliwaza. with the AU during the leadership impasse between Chairperson of Governance and Administration Cluster Dr Nkosazana Dlamini- Zuma speaking during a media briefing held in Pretoria, 20 February 2012. 1 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/2.0/ January and July 2012. Like the Jean Ping-Libya situa- Home Affairs was based on a coherent government “It is a fact that Africa was tion where the AU felt that Africa misread its actions mandate to go in and transform it. This is not the because they were not publicized, civil society actors same set of circumstances that shape her entry into divided internationally on interested in the AU can argue that behind closed the commission that guides what is primarily a politi- doors, they lobbied African state representatives to cal body. Libya and NATO.” work towards a resolution on the AU commission Secondly, the circumstances that led to Dlamini- leadership. Zuma’s position at the helm of the commission have Nonetheless, in the public theatre, it appears been characterized by multiple concerns. It would be tinental leadership on the Cote d’Ivoire crisis, which that we left the decision on who would run the com- short sighted of us to dismiss them and reduce this was in the end resolved through the heavy interven- mission and steer the Union to the politicians. We to “a woman going to show the men how it is done”. tion of former colonial power France. Again the AU constructed it as a space in which we would have There have been multiple analyses offered on the would argue that in instances where the sub-regional no influence even within the court of public opinion. commission leadership impasse, which I do not wish body has shown leadership in the matter like ECOWAS We waited for direction from the political class with to rehearse here except through a summary. Despite did, their role is to reinforce those efforts and not to whom we have had deep concerns about their responses popular perception, it has been argued in many superimpose its solutions. After all the African Peace to various crises on the continent – both overt and African diplomatic spaces that most African leaders and Security Architecture (APSA) finds contextual covert – Kenya, Zimbabwe, Madagascar, Libya, Cote were not pleased with the turn of events in Libya, interpretation through similar frameworks in sub- d’Ivoire and Mali are a few examples. To assume now which was unfortunately framed by their ‘consent’3 to regional organisations. that with a woman at the helm, automatic access is the now infamous United Nations Security Council In both cases though, South Africa as one of guaranteed and a different modus operandi will be resolution 1973. There has been squabbling over Africa’s strong states played a central role. Some may encouraged is at best presumptuous. whether the resolution was explicit about regime argue that the turn of events in Libya that can be read Our failure to exercise leadership during this change and whether indeed African leaders in inter- as a re-assertion of imperialism or the treatment of period must be reclaimed through renewed concerted preting ‘by any means necessary’ refused to see how the Mbeki and subsequent Jacob Zuma led mediation conversations with the new leadership of the AU and that enabled North Atlantic Treaty Organisation efforts in Cote d’Ivoire slighted one of Africa’s giants. to reclaim in tangible terms that the Union is in ser- (NATO) to happen on Libya. Perhaps this was the It is here that the question of South Africa’s hegemonic vice of African peoples. That cannot be done on the proverbial straw on the camel’s back that in effect interests must be understood and the Dlamini-Zuma basis of the gender card but must be done in the con- split African nations in terms of being able to coalesce candidature as representative of Southern Africa located. text of the bureaucratic cultures Dlamini-Zuma is African interests at a global instead of prioritising I do not argue that South Africa’s interests both eco- bound to confront in the Union. Dismantling these national interests because of foreign financial flows for nomic and political have not been pursued in other insidious institutional cultures do not rely solely on budgetary support. It is a fact that Africa was divided ways. South Africa’s economic imprint through diverse her experience but on the support both internally internationally on Libya and NATO. business interests some more visible than others such and externally to enable that shift. Dlamini-Zuma’s But Libya only had an accumulated effect after as the almost ubiquitous presence of Woolworths, much touted success at the South African Ministry of the failure of the AU to offer decisive public and con- Shoprite, Mr. Price, MTN and cable television provider 2 DSTV in major capitals across Africa is evident. Most will become the scapegoat that is used to rationalize are highly dependent on the West and this inadvert- of our countries on the other hand do not necessarily Dlamini-Zuma’s unpopular decisions cannot be wished ently shapes their foreign policy decisions. Most enjoy the same opportunities in a highly protected away. If I draw an analogy to Barrack Obama’s presi- immediately there is a perceived Francophone/ business environment in South Africa dency, the arguments about his lack of foreign policy Anglophone divide that she has the task of remedy- Whether we believe that unwritten rules cannot experience in addition to decisions that have been ing despite being constructed as central to cementing be broken, the insistence by South Africa that Dlamini- constructed as both unpopular by the opposition or that divide. This is in addition to a host of active and Zuma’s candidature was a sub-regional response in a unacceptable by the Black community because he is latent conflicts raging across the continent. context where it wields enormous economic, political the first Black president are likely to occur to Dlamini- Support Dlamini- Zuma we must, but the women’s and cultural weight is a fallacy. A useful analogy here Zuma as well. movement must be alive to the fact that her gender is the unlikely insistence by the USA to field a secre- Do we expect a radical reduction in the spikes of will be the scapegoat for any unpopular decisions she tary general for the United Nations (UN). Admittedly, sexual and gender based violence during situations of makes. We must not place analysis in the public domain the USA and other economic and political actors armed conflict? Do we anticipate a more nuanced en- that makes this ‘excuse’ a foregone conclusion in a heavyweights exercise their power through perma- gagement around peace security issues on the conti- context where gender is easily mobilized to ‘explain’ nent membership of the powerful United Nations nent without relating questions of gender equality to away inefficiency and inexperience. As the women’s Security Council but to insist on exercising that power women’s issues alone but instead construct it as one movement we must resist the urge to be drawn into more broadly within the UN would further destabi- of the central determinants of how we understand comparative analysis based on her predecessor as a lise the delicate balance of power and principles, which the inequalities of the society more broadly? I don’t man and her as a woman.

Load more