DOCSLIB.ORG

6 X 10.Long New.P65

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-76440-7 - The Cambridge History of Philosophy in Late Antiquity, Volume I Edited by Lloyd P. Gerson Index More information INDEX LOCORUM This index includes the main references to the principal philosophers and theologians treated in this work. The titles are usually given in English, except where the works are normally known by their Greek or Latin titles (e.g., Porphyry’s Isagoge) or when there is no translation of the work into English. Abelard, Peter On First Philosophy Logica nostrorum petitioni sociorum 3.3–6.12 876 509.9ff. 900 Theology of Aristotle Theologia scholarium 25.15–27.6 877 1.1411–1750 897 27.7–28.3 884 Aeneas of Gaza Alan of Lille Theophrastus Anticlaudianus 2.19–20 455 3.386–468 904 Aetius¨ Regulae Caelestis Iuris Doctrines (De placitis reliquiae) prol. 5,p.122 900 1.10.5 129 Albert the Great 1.29.2 156 De causis et processu universitatis a prima causa 2.3.4 155 i,t.4,c.5 907 4.2.6 142 De homine 4.3.10 150 t. 1,q.4,a.5 913 al-Far¯ ab¯ ´ Super ethica commentum The Harmonization of the Two Opinions of the i, 1. 5, 29 906 Two Sages, Plato the Divine and Aristotle Albinus 36.5–37.1 886 Prologue 66.2–67.3 889 3 81 The Perfect State 4 75 56.2–58.8 890 6 93 68.6–13 890 5 98 88.11–92.10 891 [Testimonies] 94.8–13 891 T16 G 96 204.13–206.3 892 Alcinous 245 892 Handbook al-Kind´ 2.1 202 On the Exposition about Bowing of the Outermost 3 499 Body and its Obedience to God 4 106 1.97.6–103.5 874 4.1 201 1.244–61 874 7 499 1183 © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-76440-7 - The Cambridge History of Philosophy in Late Antiquity, Volume I Edited by Lloyd P. Gerson Index More information 1184 Index locorum Alcinous (cont.) 166.15–38 81 7–11 80 167.13 89 8–10 306 169.32–5 88 10 413 169.35–41 88 10 415 171.15 86 10.3 264 171.27.34 86 10.3–4 177 176.7 96 10.7 264 176.42 96 12.1 80 177.45–178.12 94 15 86 178.26–32 96 15.1 264, 265 178.36 96 15.2 264, 265, 267 178.36–8 96 23 95, 96 178.39–46 96 23–5 80 179.12–13 95 25 96 181.42–5 90, 92 25.6 249 181.44 65, 98 27–30 80 182.3–6 98 28.3 264 182.5–8 92 29 207 183.15–16 98 32.4 252 184.14–36 97 [numbering according to Hermann] 186.14.29 97 101 266 188.5–11 81 153.25–154.5 81 189.5–11 94 153.31 81 189.12–27 95 155.17–19 410 196b 409 155.26–36 94 Alexander of Aphrodisias 155.39–41 506 Commentary on Aristotle, 155.39–42 94 Metaphysics 156.5–8 94 58.31–59.8 72 156.19–23 94 166.19–29 152 157.16–21 94 Commentary on Aristotle, Prior Analytics 157.21–36 94 1.2, 25.25–26.23 401 158.28 78 1.8–9 31 159.38–42 94 On Fate 159.38–160.41 81 9 268 160.3–41 94 12 268 163.14–15 89 14 268 164.17–27 90 16 268 164.18–23 92 17 268 164.19 292 19 268 164.23–31 65, 98 25 195.8–18 156 164.31–2 91 25 196.7–12 156 164.40–165.4 90 30 268 165 546 31 268 165.16–34 91 35 268 165.23–38 91 36 268 165.34 91 37 268 166.1 91 On Mixture and Increase 166.4 506 11–12, 226.24–30 155 © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-76440-7 - The Cambridge History of Philosophy in Late Antiquity, Volume I Edited by Lloyd P. Gerson Index More information Index locorum 1185 On the Principles of the Universe (Arabic) 1.818.24–30 157 23 157 1.11 22.14.20 159 58 155 1.17 30.7–9 157 76 157 1.23 36.22–3 155 84.4–11 881 1.25 39.9 153 114 155 1.25 40.17–23 157 120 155 1.25 40.30–41.2 155 On Providence (Arabic, some 1.26 40.22–5 157 fragments in Greek) 2.3 415 25.1–19 155 2.8 157 63.2ff 155 2.18 62.28–30 157 65.9–16 155 2.19 878 67.10–22 155 2.19 63.20 157 67.30–68.4 155 2.19 152-3 48, 736 68.5–11 155 2.21 65.25–66.2 155 87.5–91.4 155 87.5–91.4 155 89.7–9 881 Ambrose On the Soul Letters 6.4–5 158 17 394 17.9–15 761 18 394 24.18–26 406 18.32 384 80.9–12 202 40 395 88.17–91.6 409 Ammonius, son of Hermeias 89.4–91.6 409 Commentary on Aristotle, Categories 89.21–90.2 154 5.31–6.8 662 90.2–8 160 7.34 ff. 662 90.23–91.5 154 8.11–19 662 234.21–23 158 11.8–17 660 Praeter commentaria scripta minora,Supp.Ar. 54.4–9 745 ii.1: De An. 90.2–91.6 (ed. Bruns) 891 Commentary on Aristotle, On Interpretation Supplement to On the Soul (De anima libri 1.6–11 661 mantissa) 1.7–11 653 106.20–1 153 34.10–39.10 659 107.29–110.3 409 38.26–8 660 107.29–113.24 891 39.11 663 (Mantissa Book 2 = De intellectu) 213.8–10 740 110.4 152 248.17–249.1 741 110.5–25 152 254.22–31 661 112.5 152 Commentary on Aristotle, Prior Analytics 112.5–113.6 152 31.16 373 112.24–30 160 67.32–69.28 662 113.12–14 155 Commentary on Porphyry, Introduction (Isagoge) 113.18–24 152, 153 11.6–16.16 797 5.120.9–17 157 106.4–5 707 17 151.3–13 146 Anastasius Sina¨ıta (or Anastasios Sina¨ıta) 17 151.30–152.10 146 Guide for Life 22 170.10–15 155 1.1.27–34 856 Problems and Solutions 1.3.19–21 857 1.14.3 157 1.3.42–45 857 © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-76440-7 - The Cambridge History of Philosophy in Late Antiquity, Volume I Edited by Lloyd P. Gerson Index More information 1186 Index locorum [Andronicus of Rhodes] Aristides, Aelius On the Passions Against Plato Concerning Rhetoric 2.1.3 207 72 107 4.4.1 207 258–9 110 6.1.1 207 Apology Anselm 1.3 177 Monologion Oration on Rome 16.30.1–31 902 10–11, 34, 36, 59, 97 17 17.31.21–32. 4 902 Aristotle 24.42.8–29 903 Categories Proslogion 1a24–6 556 2 255 1b1–2 and 8-9 18, 3 255 556 Apuleius 1b18–19 465 Apology 3a21 149 90 117 4b20 371 Florida 14b38 465 20.4 18 15a2–3 465 The Golden Ass (Metamorphoses) Metaphysics 11.5 18 986a25 548 On the Doctrine of Plato 987b26ff. 548 190 91 988a10–11 73 193 90 990b3 663 193 91 1026a6ff. 499 193–4 90 1026a6–32 203 204 90 1026b13ff. 155 228 97 1036a2–9 159 228 98 1039b27–30 159 252–3 98 1040a33–b2 159 On the God of Socrates 1043b 549 137–41 86 1050b28–30 157 138 95 1064a28–1064b6 203 150–56 86 12.7 309, 311, 319, 412, On Interpretation 675 4 18 1072b13–14 878 On the World 12.9 309 291 95 1075a21–2, 24–25 156 Aquinas, Thomas 1075a25–6 878 Commentary on the Book of Causes 1075b37–1076a3 154 Proem.3.3–10 879 1075a16–25 156 16.92–8 909, 910 1087a10–25 159 17.98–9 909, 910 Meteorology 18.100–4 911 1.2.339a21 878 18.102–3 911 1.3 753 18.104 906 1.3.339b30–340a3 754 Commentary on the Sentences Nicomachean Ethics 1. d. viii, q. 5,a.1–2 902 1094a2–3 801 Arethas 1094a18–22 801 Letter to Niketas 1094b23–5 794 1.342–62 854 1096b32–4 801 © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-76440-7 - The Cambridge History of Philosophy in Late Antiquity, Volume I Edited by Lloyd P. Gerson Index More information Index locorum 1187 1097a16–19 801 On the Heavens 1097a25–b16 801 1.2–4 731, 753 1097b16–20 147 279a 203 1098b12–15 801 279a30 242 1099b2–6 147 1.10–12 443 1099b26 143 1.12 88 1100a6–8 143 2.12 728 1100a35–b8 801 300b17–19 728 1100b33–1101a7 801 On Interpretation 1102a16–18 801 16a19ff. 659 1108a8 147 16b33–17a2 803 1109b30–1110b17 516 23a23–4 741 1110b19–1111a20 516 On the Parts of Animals 1111a21–1111b3 516 641a14–20 762 1111b4–1112a17 516 697b2–3 465 1111b19–26 826 On Sleep and Sleeplessness 1111b26–9 801 455a13ff.
Recommended publications
  • Tra Antichità E Modernità. Studi Di Storia Della Filosofia Medievale E

    Tra Antichità E Modernità. Studi Di Storia Della Filosofia Medievale E

    ABSTRACTS Fiorella Retucci, «Magister Thomas Anglicus Minor». Tommaso di York fon- te dell’Expositio di Bertoldo di Moosburg, pp. 1–41 Berthold of Moosburg had the whole Sapientiale by Thomas of York con- stantly at hand when writing his commentary on Proclus. Even thought Ber- thold never refers by name to the English Franciscan except in his tabula auc- toritatum, where Thomas is registered as «Magister Thomas Anglicus minor», he quotes extensively and verbatim from the Sapientiale throughout his Expo- sitio of Proclus; astoundingly, Berthold quotes more from Thomas than he does from his Dominican predecessors in the Teutonic Province, Albert the Great, Ulrich of Strassburg and Dietrich of Freiberg. The following articles describes the presence of Thomas of York in Berthold of Moosburg’s Expositio super Elementationem theologicam. An appendix provides a systematic investigation of the relationship between the texts of the two authors. Keywords: Berthold of Moosburg; Expositio super Elementationem theologicam; Thomas of York; Sapientiale. Stefan Kirschner, Albertino Rinaldi da Salso on the Motion of Elements and Mixed Bodies in a Void, pp. 42–70 In his questio on the motion of elements and mixed bodies in a void the Italian 1145 professor of practical medicine, Albertino Rinaldi da Salso di Piacenza (Alb- ertinus de Rainaldis de Placentia, also known as Albertino da Piacenza), held the clearly non-Aristotelian view that an element in a void would not move instantaneously, but successively. To prove his conclusion Albertino draws to a large degree on arguments proposed by Richard Kilvington. Among the few 14th century authors who rejected Aristotle’s account of motion in a va- cuum Kilvington had presented the most thorough analysis of this subject.
  • Athenaeus' Reading of the Aulos Revolution ( Deipnosophistae 14.616E–617F)

    Athenaeus' Reading of the Aulos Revolution ( Deipnosophistae 14.616E–617F)

    The Journal of Hellenic Studies http://journals.cambridge.org/JHS Additional services for The Journal of Hellenic Studies: Email alerts: Click here Subscriptions: Click here Commercial reprints: Click here Terms of use : Click here New music and its myths: Athenaeus' reading of the Aulos revolution ( Deipnosophistae 14.616e–617f) Pauline A. Leven The Journal of Hellenic Studies / Volume 130 / November 2010, pp 35 - 48 DOI: 10.1017/S0075426910000030, Published online: 19 November 2010 Link to this article: http://journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S0075426910000030 How to cite this article: Pauline A. Leven (2010). New music and its myths: Athenaeus' reading of the Aulos revolution ( Deipnosophistae 14.616e– 617f). The Journal of Hellenic Studies, 130, pp 35-48 doi:10.1017/S0075426910000030 Request Permissions : Click here Downloaded from http://journals.cambridge.org/JHS, IP address: 147.91.1.45 on 23 Sep 2013 Journal of Hellenic Studies 130 (2010) 35−47 DOI: 10.1017/S0075426910000030 NEW MUSIC AND ITS MYTHS: ATHENAEUS’ READING OF THE AULOS REVOLUTION (DEIPNOSOPHISTAE 14.616E−617F) PAULINE A. LEVEN Yale University* Abstract: Scholarship on the late fifth-century BC New Music Revolution has mostly relied on the evidence provided by Athenaeus, the pseudo-Plutarch De musica and a few other late sources. To this date, however, very little has been done to understand Athenaeus’ own role in shaping our understanding of the musical culture of that period. This article argues that the historical context provided by Athenaeus in the section of the Deipnosophistae that cites passages of Melanippides, Telestes and Pratinas on the mythology of the aulos (14.616e−617f) is not a credible reflection of the contemporary aesthetics and strategies of the authors and their works.
  • Jan Aertsen. Annotated Bibliography of His English Writings

    Jan Aertsen. Annotated Bibliography of His English Writings

    Jan Aertsen. Annotated Bibliography of His English Writings https://www.ontology.co/biblio/jan-aertsen.htm Theory and History of Ontology by Raul Corazzon | e-mail: [email protected] Selected Bibliography of Jan A. Aertsen. Writings in English Jan Adrianus Aertsen (Amsterdam, 1938 - 2016), formerly professor of Medieval Philosophy and Modern Catholic Philosophy at the Free University of Amsterdam (since 1984), was the director of the Thomas Institute in Cologne (Germany) until 2003; his areas of interest were the history of transcendentals, the philosophy of Thomas Aquinas and Meister Eckhart. A complete bibliography of his writings up to 2002 was published by Sabine Folger-Fonfara in: Martin Pickavé (ed.), Die Logik des Transzendentalen. Festschrift für Jan A. Aertsen zum 65. Geburstag, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2003, (Miscellanea Mediaevalia, 30), pp. XXIII-XXXII. I give an updated bibliography with the omission of the publications in Dutch and of some minor writings. BOOKS AUTHORED 1. Aertsen, Jan A. 1984. Medieval Reflections on Truth. Adaequatio rei et intellectus. Amsterdam: VU Boekhandel. Inaugural address on the occasion of his taking up the chair of Medieval philosophy of the Free University in Amsterdam on November 9, 1984. "There are certain basic words which form the undertone of our thinking and of the manner in which we experience things. These basic words are not unchangeable; they often receive a different content . One such basic word is 'truth'." This is the start of the report of the Synod of the Reformed Churches in the Netherlands, issued in 1981, "On the nature of the authority of Scripture".(1) How does it happen that the Bible is read so differently? In searching for an answer to this problem, the report adopts a course remarkable within the.
  • Early Pyrrhonism As a Sect of Buddhism? a Case Study in the Methodology of Comparative Philosophy

    Early Pyrrhonism As a Sect of Buddhism? a Case Study in the Methodology of Comparative Philosophy

    Comparative Philosophy Volume 9, No. 2 (2018): 1-40 Open Access / ISSN 2151-6014 / www.comparativephilosophy.org https://doi.org/10.31979/2151-6014(2018).090204 EARLY PYRRHONISM AS A SECT OF BUDDHISM? A CASE STUDY IN THE METHODOLOGY OF COMPARATIVE PHILOSOPHY MONTE RANSOME JOHNSON & BRETT SHULTS ABSTRACT: We offer a sceptical examination of a thesis recently advanced in a monograph published by Princeton University Press entitled Greek Buddha: Pyrrho’s Encounter with Early Buddhism in Central Asia. In this dense and probing work, Christopher I. Beckwith, a professor of Central Eurasian studies at Indiana University, Bloomington, argues that Pyrrho of Elis adopted a form of early Buddhism during his years in Bactria and Gandhāra, and that early Pyrrhonism must be understood as a sect of early Buddhism. In making his case Beckwith claims that virtually all scholars of Greek, Indian, and Chinese philosophy have been operating under flawed assumptions and with flawed methodologies, and so have failed to notice obvious and undeniable correspondences between the philosophical views of the Buddha and of Pyrrho. In this study we take Beckwith’s proposal and challenge seriously, and we examine his textual basis and techniques of translation, his methods of examining passages, his construal of problems and his reconstruction of arguments. We find that his presuppositions are contentious and doubtful, his own methods are extremely flawed, and that he draws unreasonable conclusions. Although the result of our study is almost entirely negative, we think it illustrates some important general points about the methodology of comparative philosophy. Keywords: adiaphora, anātman, anattā, ataraxia, Buddha, Buddhism, Democritus, Pāli, Pyrrho, Pyrrhonism, Scepticism, trilakṣaṇa 1.
  • Forgetful Platonism: Misrepresenting Proclus and Twentieth-Century

    Forgetful Platonism: Misrepresenting Proclus and Twentieth-Century

    Misrepresenting Neoplatonism in Contemporary Christian Dionysian Polemic: Eriugena and Nicholas of Cusa versus Vladimir Lossky and Jean-Luc Marion American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 82:4 (2008): 683–703. Wayne Hankey Part I: From Eriugena to Nicholas of Cusa The Corpus Areopagiticum in Greek—or at least a part of it—circulated in Rome, probably from the time of Gregory the Great‘s Homily XXIV (592 or 593), but certainly from the middle of the seventh up to the second half of the ninth century.1 Nonetheless, there was no profound encounter by the Latins with the philosophical and mystical content of the corpus, until the translations by Hilduin and Eriugena consequent on its arrival at the Frankish court in 827.2 John the Scot‘s grasp and development of what the Areopagite passed on from his sources has only rarely been equalled. After Boethius, he was the first to draw together the Greek and Latin Platonists. Among the Latins, Augustine and Boethius, together with Ambrose, because, as Eriugena wrote, he so often followed the Greeks, were pre-eminent .3 He learned most from the Greek texts he translated—the Dionysian corpus, the Ambigua and Scoliae of Maximus the Confessor, and the De hominis opificio of Gregory of Nyssa—; what he took from the Latins was generally assimilated to their logic.4 His sources were so nearly exclusively Christian, and the texts so predominantly theological and mystical—despite such ―secular‖ and pagan authorities as the De nuptiis Philologiae et Mercurii of Martianus Capella from his Irish education5—that no real confrontation between Hellenic and Christian Neoplatonisms occurs for him.
  • Reading Proclus and the Bookof Causes

    Reading Proclus and the Bookof Causes

    introduction Reading Proclus and the Book of Causes: Notes on the Western Scholarly Networks and Debates Dragos Calma University College Dublin / Newman Centre for the Study of Religions, Dublin The majority of contributions reunited in this volume were first presented during the first of the three sessions of the conference “Les Éléments de thé- ologie et le Livre des causes du Ve au XVIIe siècle”. It took place at the École pratique des hautes études, Paris, on 13–14 November 2015, during the ter- rorist attacks.1 The second took place on 12–13 February 2016, and the third on 14–15–16 April 2016; all within the framework of the project LIBER (ANR- 13-PDOC-0018-01) which I directed between 2013 and 2017 at the École pra- tique des hautes études, Paris, and which generously financed these meet- ings and the publication of the proceedings.2 The conferences were organ- ised by Marc Geoffroy and myself, under the auspices of Olivier Boulnois, Philippe Hoffmann, Ruedi Imbach, Zénon Kaluza and Dominique Poirel. I wish to acknowledge the important support of the following bodies in the organisa- tion of the conference: École pratique des hautes études, Équipe “philosophie arabe” of the Centre “Jean Pépin”—CNRS (UMR 8230), Laboratoire d’études sur les monothéismes—CNRS (UMR 8584), Labex haStec (Laboratoire européen d’histoire et anthropologie des savoirs, des techniques et des croyances), Insti- tut de recherche et d’histoire des textes—CNRS, Centre “Pierre Abélard”— Université Paris Sorbonne. Compared to the original program of the three conferences, minor thematic rearrangements have been made for publication.
  • Complete Works of ARISTOXENUS of TARENTUM (Fl

    Complete Works of ARISTOXENUS of TARENTUM (Fl

    The Complete Works of ARISTOXENUS OF TARENTUM (fl. 4th century BC) Contents The Translation The Elements of Harmony The Greek Texts The Elements of Harmony Fragments The Biography Introduction to Aristoxenus (1902) by Henry S. Macran The Delphi Classics Catalogue © Delphi Classics 2021 Version 1 The Complete Works of ARISTOXENUS OF TARENTUM By Delphi Classics, 2021 COPYRIGHT Complete Works of Aristoxenus First published in the United Kingdom in 2021 by Delphi Classics. © Delphi Classics, 2021. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of the publisher, nor be otherwise circulated in any form other than that in which it is published. ISBN: 9781801700115 Delphi Classics is an imprint of Delphi Publishing Ltd Hastings, East Sussex United Kingdom Contact: [email protected] www.delphiclassics.com The Translation Taranto, ancient site of Tarentum, a coastal city in Apulia, Southern Italy — Aristoxenus’ birthplace Ancient ruins in the Temple of Poseidon, Taranto The Elements of Harmony Translated by Henry Stewart Macran, 1902 Flourishing in the fourth century BC, Aristoxenus of Tarentum was a Greek Peripatetic philosopher and a pupil of Aristotle. Almost all of his writings, consisting of four hundred and fifty-three books, dealing with philosophy, ethics and music, have been lost. Only a treatise on music, Elements of Harmony (Ἁρμονικὰ στοιχεῖα) survives in a significant state, though the text is incomplete. The book is of invaluable worth, providing the chief source of knowledge on ancient Greek music. Aristoxenus was born at Tarentum, the son of a learned musician named Spintharus (otherwise Mnesias).
  • Gracia, Jje / Tb Noone, Eds

    Gracia, Jje / Tb Noone, Eds

    GRACIA, J. J. E. / T. B. NOONE, EDS.: A COMPANION TO PHILOSOPHY IN THE MIDDLE AGES Philosophy in the Middle Ages: An Introduction: Jorge J. E. Gracia PART I. THE HISTORICAL CONTEXT 1 The Ancient Philosophical Legacy and its Transmission to the Middle Ages: Charles H. Lohr 2 The Patristic Background: Stephen F. Brown 3 Philosophy in the Latin Christian West: 750–1050: Peter King 4 The School of Chartres: Winthrop Wetherbee 5 Religious Orders: M. Michèle Mulchahey and Timothy B. Noone 6 Scholasticism: Timothy B. Noone 7 The Parisian Condemnations of 1270 and 1277: John F. Wippel PART II: THE AUTHORS 1 Adam of Wodeham: Rega Wood 2 Adelard of Bath: Jeremiah Hackett 3 Alan of Lille: John Marenbon 4 Albert of Saxony: Edward Grant 5 Albertus Magnus: Mechthild Dreyer 6 Albumasar (Abu Ma’shar): Jeremiah Hackett 7 Alexander of Hales: Christopher M. Cullen 8 Alfarabi (Al-Farabý): Deborah L. Black 9 Algazali (Al-Ghazalý): Thérèse-Anne Druart 10 Alhacen (Al-Hasan): David C. Lindberg 11 Alkindi (Al-Kindi): Jean Jolivet 12 Alrazi (Al-Razý): Thérèse-Anne Druart 13 Anselm of Canterbury: Jasper Hopkins 14 Arnaldus of Villanova: Francisco Bertelloni 15 Augustine: Scott MacDonald 16 Avempace (Ibn Bájjah): Idris Samawi Hamid 17 Avencebrol (Ibn Gabirol): Tamar Rudavsky 18 Averroes (Ibn Rushd): Richard C. Taylor 19 Avicenna (Ibn Sýna): David B. Burrell 20 Bernard of Clairvaux: Brian Patrick McGuire 21 Berthold of Moosburg: Bruce Milem 22 Boethius: John Magee 23 Boethius of Dacia: B. Carlos Bazán 24 Bonaventure: Andreas Speer 25 Dante Alighieri: Timothy B. Noone 26 Denys the Carthusian: Kent Emery,: 27 Dietrich of Freiberg: Roland J.
  • New Perspectives on the Condemnation of 1277 and Its Aftermath

    New Perspectives on the Condemnation of 1277 and Its Aftermath

    NEW PERSPECTIVES ON THE CONDEMNATION OF 1277 AND ITS AFTERMATH In 1996 Kent Emery and Andreas Speer announced a project of research devoted to the aftermath of the Condemnation of 1277, sponsored by the Medieval Institute at the University of Notre Dame and the Thomas-Institut der Universität zu Köln1. Between 1997 and 1999 thirty-five European and American scholars held four meetings at Köln, Notre Dame and Tübingen. The Acts of these meetings have been published in 2001 under the title Nach der Verurteilung von 1277. Philosophie und Theologie an der Universität von Paris im letzen Viertel des 13. Jahrhunderts. Studien und Texte2. Not only for its impressive size (more than 1000 pages), this magnificently printed book is a major contribution to the history of later medieval thought. The essays collected and edited by the directors of this scholarly enter- prise (Jan Aertsen, Kent Emery and Andreas Speer) present careful, detailed and fine analysis of very important issues in different fields of philosophy and theology at the University of Paris between the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries: psychology and gnoseology, nat- ural philosophy, metaphysics, ethics and, needless to say, the contro- versial topic of the relationship between theology and philosophy. Some articles are entirely devoted to the most outstanding thinkers of this period: Albert the Great (Henryk Anzulewicz), Thomas Aquinas (Joseph P. Wawrykow), Henry of Ghent (Christoph Kann, Kent Emery), Giles of Rome (Giorgio Pini), Godfrey of Fontaines (John F. Wippel), Thomas Sutton (Gyula Klima), Duns Scotus (B. Carlos 1. K. EMERY, A. SPEER, «After the Condemnations of 1277: the University of Paris in the Last Quarter of the Thirteenth Century», in: Bulletin de philosophie médiévale 38 (1996), pp.
  • AT the CROSSROADS of SCHOLASTICISM and NORTHERN HUMANISM* the Late Medieval and Early Modem Periods Experienced Change in a Vari

    AT the CROSSROADS of SCHOLASTICISM and NORTHERN HUMANISM* the Late Medieval and Early Modem Periods Experienced Change in a Vari

    JTA ~'s. In this they show them­ l focused perspective'. 'The MJ.F.M. HOENEN 'Jissance and Renascences in 1 altemately galvanized and AT THE CROSSROADS OF SCHOLASTICISM AND NORTHERN ~ping at its grave and tried to HUMANISM* IüS moment it succeeded. ,44 : to that last conclusion, it is ~onsolatio form an apt illust­ The late medieval and early modem periods experienced change in a variety f the northem humanists to a I offields: economics, religion, theology, and philosophy. These changes have :}uity'. been studied in many articles and book publications, most recently in the two-volume Handbook ofEuropean History 1400-1600.1 Some of the most interesting studies have shown - if we restrict ourselves to the transition from scholasticism to humanism - that scholasticism already bears humanist elements and that conversely humanism still carries with it scholastic attributes, an observation which mutatis mutandis also applies to many other changing areas of the period? The distinction, then, between scholasticism and humanism is not as strict as some of the standard works of intellectual history would have it. This is hardly surprising. Historical reality is always more complex than human concepts can express. To meet this complexity, the transition from scholasticism to humanism needs to be studied again and again, when new questions suggest themselves, and in the light of newly revealed or neglected scholastic sources. Only then can we begin to understand the complexities of intellectual history as it evolved in the late medieval and early modem period.3 For my part I would like to investigate the similarities and differences between scholasticism and northem humanism based on some interesting scholastic source materials, that in my view deserve closer attention and study.
  • Dionysian Mystical Theology in the Commentaries of Thomas Gallus (D.1246)

    Dionysian Mystical Theology in the Commentaries of Thomas Gallus (D.1246)

    Experiencing the Word: Dionysian Mystical Theology in the Commentaries of Thomas Gallus (d.1246) The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:37925651 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA Experiencing the Word: Dionysian Mystical Theology in the Commentaries of Thomas Gallus (d.1246) A dissertation presented by Craig Henry Tichelkamp to The Faculty of Harvard Divinity School in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Theology In the Subject of Theology Harvard University Cambridge, Massachusetts November 2017 © 2017, Craig Tichelkamp All rights reserved Dissertation Advisor: Professor Amy Hollywood Craig Henry Tichelkamp Experiencing the Word: Dionysian Mystical Theology in the Commentaries of Thomas Gallus (d.1246) Abstract The mystical theology of Thomas Gallus, “the last great Victorine,” was inseparable from his theology of sacred literature. This dissertation analyzes Gallus’s major works: his commentaries on the Song of Songs and the Corpus Dionysiacum (CD). I argue that Gallus’s mystical theology emerges from his analysis of constitutive theological tensions in the CD about God, language, and mystical perfection. That is, in navigating the CD’s conceptual apertures, Gallus is even more thoroughly Dionysian than has been previously estimated. At the same time, Gallus’s mystical theology is an original creation—distinctively Augustinian and Victorine, and informed by his complementary interpretation of the Song as depicting the union between the soul and the Word.
  • Scarica L'intero Numero In

    Scarica L'intero Numero In

    Syzetesis – Rivista di filosofia Pubblicato da ΣΥΖΗΤΗΣΙΣ Associazione Filosofica ISSN 1974-5044 Direzione: Marco Tedeschini, Francesco Verde Comitato scientifico: Stefano Bancalari (Roma), Sergio Bucchi (Roma), Mirella Capozzi (Roma), Carlo Cellucci (Roma), Vincenzo Costa (Cam- pobasso), Antonella Del Prete (Viterbo), Adriano Fabris (Pisa), Serena Feloj (Pavia), Stefano Gensini (Roma), Tonino Griffero (Roma), David Konstan (New York), Roberta Lanfredini (Firenze), Cristina Marras (Ro- ma), Francesca G. Masi (Venezia), Pierre-Marie Morel (Paris), Geert Roskam (Leuven), Denis Seron (Liège), Emidio Spinelli (Roma), Voula Tsouna (Santa Barbara, CA), Pierluigi Valenza (Roma), Marlein van Raalte (Leiden), James Warren (Cambridge), Gereon Wolters (Konstanz), Leonid Zhmud (St. Petersburg) Responsabile di Redazione: Alessandro Agostini Redazione: Selene Iris Siddhartha Brumana, Silvia De Martini, Tiziana Di Fabio, Enrico Piergiacomi, Marie Rebecchi, Luca Tonetti Syzetesis Associazione Filosofica Via dei Laterani 36 00184 Roma [email protected] http://www.syzetesis.it/rivista.html Gli articoli pubblicati sono sottoposti a double-blind peer review. Syzetesis è rivista scientifica (area 11) secondo la classificazione dei pe- riodici stabilita dall’ANVUR. INDICE Anno VII – 2020 (Nuova Serie) ARTICOLI Momenti di filosofia italiana (a cura di FEDERICA PAZZELLI e FRANCESCO VERDE) FEDERICA PAZZELLI-FRANCESCO VERDE, Premessa 7 MARCELLO MUSTÈ, Gramsci e Antonio Labriola: La filosofia della praxis come genesi teorica del marxismo italiano 11 EMIDIO SPINELLI,