DOCSLIB.ORG

En En Amendments 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
En En Amendments 1 European Parliament 2019-2024 Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development 2020/2039(INI) 16.10.2020 AMENDMENTS 1 - 74 Draft opinion Mazaly Aguilar (PE657.414v01-00) Reversing demographic trends in EU regions using cohesion policy instruments (2020/2039(INI)) AM\1215651EN.docx PE658.985v01-00 EN United in diversityEN AM_Com_NonLegOpinion PE658.985v01-00 2/33 AM\1215651EN.docx EN Amendment 1 Tonino Picula, Paolo De Castro, Attila Ara-Kovács, Juozas Olekas, Carmen Avram, Ivo Hristov, Pina Picierno, Miroslav Číž Draft opinion Citation 1 a (new) Draft opinion Amendment - having regard to the European Parliament resolution of 14 November 2017 on the deployment of cohesion policy instruments by regions to address demographic change, Or. en Amendment 2 Ivo Hristov Draft opinion Recital A Draft opinion Amendment A. whereas Europe’s regions currently A. whereas Europe’s regions currently face far-reaching demographic changes face far-reaching demographic changes such as a low birth rate, an ageing such as a low birth rate, a high mortality population and an ongoing rural exodus; rate, an ageing population and an ongoing rural exodus; Or. bg Amendment 3 Ivo Hristov Draft opinion Recital A a (new) Draft opinion Amendment Aa. whereas rural and disadvantaged regions are often unable to acquire the same economic indicators for a given time period as other regions, which in some cases appears to pose problems when it AM\1215651EN.docx 3/33 PE658.985v01-00 EN comes to applying for support; Or. bg Amendment 4 Cristian Ghinea, Irène Tolleret, Adrián Vázquez Lázara, Atidzhe Alieva-Veli, Ulrike Müller, Martin Hlaváček Draft opinion Recital A a (new) Draft opinion Amendment A a. whereas agricultural workers inrural areas, particularly those living in remote areas, suffering from demographic disadvantages, face anexceptional higher risk of poverty and social exclusion; Or. en Amendment 5 Cristian Ghinea, Irène Tolleret, Adrián Vázquez Lázara, Atidzhe Alieva-Veli, Ulrike Müller, Martin Hlaváček Draft opinion Recital A b (new) Draft opinion Amendment A b. whereas rural areas that are faced with depopulation may experience land abandonment and increased risk of forest fires and face difficulties in their economic recovery 1a; _________________ 1a Forest fires — Sparking fire smart policies in the EU, European Commission (2018). Or. en Amendment 6 PE658.985v01-00 4/33 AM\1215651EN.docx EN Maxette Pirbakas Draft opinion Recital B Draft opinion Amendment B. whereas, in the light of the B. whereas, in the light of the pandemic, policies and instruments pandemic, policies and instruments addressing demographic problems must be addressing demographic problems must be reviewed; reviewed; whereas birthrate policies in Europe must be encouraged; Or. fr Amendment 7 Mazaly Aguilar Draft opinion Recital B Draft opinion Amendment B. whereas, in the light of the B. whereas, in the light of the pandemic, policies and instruments pandemic, policies and instruments addressing demographic problems must be addressing demographic problems must be reviewed; reviewed, especially in the more sparsely populated and vulnerable areas of the Union; Or. es Amendment 8 Ivo Hristov Draft opinion Recital Б Draft opinion Amendment B. whereas, in the light of the B. whereas, in addition to already- pandemic, policies and instruments established issues and trends, the addressing demographic problems must be pandemic has also shown that policies and reviewed; instruments addressing demographic problems must be reviewed; AM\1215651EN.docx 5/33 PE658.985v01-00 EN Or. bg Amendment 9 Emmanouil Fragkos Draft opinion Recital Β Draft opinion Amendment B. whereas, in the light of the B. whereas, in the light of the pandemic, policies and instruments pandemic, policies and instruments addressing demographic problems must focusing primarily on low birth rates and be reviewed; the rural exodus must be reviewed; Or. el Amendment 10 Tonino Picula, Paolo De Castro, Attila Ara-Kovács, Juozas Olekas, Carmen Avram, Ivo Hristov, Pina Picierno, Miroslav Číž Draft opinion Recital B a (new) Draft opinion Amendment B a. whereas the demographic changes and depopulation issues are severely burdening rural, peripheral, sparsely populated areas and islands, as well as impacting the challenge of ageing, generational renewal and agriculture development; Or. en Amendment 11 Cristian Ghinea, Irène Tolleret, Adrián Vázquez Lázara, Atidzhe Alieva-Veli, Ulrike Müller, Elsi Katainen, Martin Hlaváček Draft opinion Recital B a (new) Draft opinion Amendment PE658.985v01-00 6/33 AM\1215651EN.docx EN B a. whereas, EU Cohesion Policy makes a key contribution to delivering Digital Single Market objectives on the ground, in particular through significant financial allocations from the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF); Or. en Amendment 12 Mazaly Aguilar Draft opinion Recital B a (new) Draft opinion Amendment Ba. whereas rural areas make up 44% of the Union's surface area; Or. es Amendment 13 Tonino Picula, Paolo De Castro, Attila Ara-Kovács, Juozas Olekas, Carmen Avram, Ivo Hristov, Pina Picierno, Miroslav Číž Draft opinion Recital B b (new) Draft opinion Amendment B b. whereas one of the main issues affecting rural economies is the declining share of agriculture; whereas data has shown that only 10,7% of EU farmers are below 40 years old and the farming population is ageing, which will have an impact on the agricultural sector; Or. en Amendment 14 Mazaly Aguilar AM\1215651EN.docx 7/33 PE658.985v01-00 EN Draft opinion Recital B b (new) Draft opinion Amendment Bb. whereas the needs of rural areas in the face of demographic change must be met in a more coordinated and effective manner; Or. es Amendment 15 Emmanouil Fragkos Draft opinion Paragraph 1 Draft opinion Amendment 1. Points out that the COVID-19 1. Points out that the COVID-19 pandemic must prompt us to rethink pandemic must prompt us to rethink policies designed to tackle demographic policies designed to tackle demographic problems and create new opportunities for problems and create new opportunities for economic and social development in rural economic and social development and areas; forward-looking investment in rural areas; Or. el Amendment 16 Maxette Pirbakas Draft opinion Paragraph 1 Draft opinion Amendment 1. Points out that the COVID-19 1. Points out that the COVID-19 pandemic must prompt us to rethink pandemic may serve to prompt us to policies designed to tackle demographic rethink birthrate policies designed to problems and create new opportunities for tackle demographic problems and create economic and social development in rural new opportunities for economic and social areas; development in rural areas; Or. fr PE658.985v01-00 8/33 AM\1215651EN.docx EN Amendment 17 Emmanouil Fragkos Draft opinion Paragraph 1 Draft opinion Amendment 1. Points out that the COVID-19 1. Notes the gravity of the pandemic must prompt us to rethink demographic problem and its social and policies designed to tackle demographic economic implications and accordingly problems and create new opportunities for considers it necessary to create new economic and social development in rural opportunities for economic and social areas; development in rural areas; Or. el Amendment 18 Benoît Biteau Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) Draft opinion Amendment 1 a. Emphasizes that inequalities in access to land, CAP direct payments and support, both between and within EU countries, are among the issues that need to be addressed in order to halt regional decline, allow older people to retire from agriculture and encourage young people to start farming; Or. en Amendment 19 Francisco Guerreiro Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) Draft opinion Amendment AM\1215651EN.docx 9/33 PE658.985v01-00 EN 1 a. Expects the deploiment of new cohesion social programs such as basic income pilot projects in rural areas; Or. en Amendment 20 Benoît Biteau Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) Draft opinion Amendment 1 b. Draws attention to the importance of ensuring the availability ofservices in the regions, as their decline is encouraging older people to retireearlier and move to cities where these services are easily accessible; Or. en Amendment 21 Maxette Pirbakas Draft opinion Paragraph 2 Draft opinion Amendment 2. Stresses that the ongoing 2. Stresses that the ongoing depopulation of rural areas is not only depopulation of rural areas is not only having serious economic and social having serious economic and social consequences but also hampering our consequences at local level but also chances of achieving the Green Deal’s hampering the management and upkeep of ambitious objectives; rural areas; recalls that the depopulation of rural areas is linked to the need to develop a more attractive economy and agriculture for young people; Or. fr Amendment 22 PE658.985v01-00 10/33 AM\1215651EN.docx EN Daniel Buda Draft opinion Paragraph 2 Draft opinion Amendment 2. Stresses that the ongoing 2. Stresses that the ongoing depopulation of rural areas is not only depopulation of rural areas is not only having serious economic and social having serious economic and social consequences but also hampering our consequences but also hampering our chances of achieving the Green Deal’s chances of achieving the Green Deal’s ambitious objectives; ambitious objectives; insists that the investments covered by the Green Deal should take the demographic factor into account; Or. ro Amendment 23 Ivo Hristov Draft opinion Paragraph 2 Draft opinion Amendment 2. Stresses that the ongoing 2. Stresses that the ongoing depopulation of rural areas is not only depopulation of rural areas is not only having serious economic and social having serious economic and social consequences but also hampering our consequences but also hampering our chances of achieving the Green Deal’s chances of achieving the Green Deal’s ambitious objectives; ambitious objectives and those of other EU policies such as the common agricultural policy, cohesion policy, etc.; Or. bg Amendment 24 Cristian Ghinea, Irène Tolleret, Adrián Vázquez Lázara, Atidzhe Alieva-Veli, Ulrike Müller, Martin Hlaváček Draft opinion Paragraph 2 AM\1215651EN.docx 11/33 PE658.985v01-00 EN Draft opinion Amendment 2.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • News from Copenhagen
    News from Copenhagen Updates from the OSCE PA International Secretariat 2 June 2021 | Number 842 PA President and SG brief European Parliament Foreign Affairs Committee on OSCE work resident Peter Lord Bowness (United Kingdom) and Secretary between the EP and OSCE PA. PGeneral Roberto Montella addressed the European Parlia- In response to questions on issues such as transatlantic ment’s Committee on Foreign Affairs (AFET) on 26 May. The relations, challenges facing Eastern Europe and election obser- meeting was chaired by David McAllister (Germany) and featured vation, Bowness stressed the importance of building inter-parlia- participation by a number of former OSCE parliamentarians, mentary co-operation, in particular between EU and OSCE, but including Isabel Santos (Portugal), Nacho Sanchez Amor (Spain), said that what is ultimately needed is stronger engagement from and Tonino Picula (Croatia). governments. He noted that on election observation, follow-up is In his opening remarks, President Bowness welcomed the insti- needed to ensure adherence to democratic commitments. tutional co-operation that has been facilitated by the engagement Montella said that the PA is working to strengthen the OSCE of former leaders of the OSCE PA who sit on the AFET, and pro- in order to better deliver to its end users. He also appealed to the vided an overview of the Assembly’s work for those less familiar EP to refrain from creating a new election observation institution with the PA. He highlighted in particular fact-finding visits, election but advocated a policy aiming at strengthening the ODIHR, and observation and conflict mediation as areas of common interest building co-operation within its established methodology.
    [Show full text]
  • COMMON STATEMENT on the US-EU WINE TRADE RELATIONSHIP June 14, 2021
    COMMON STATEMENT ON THE US-EU WINE TRADE RELATIONSHIP June 14, 2021 The EU and the US wine sectors play a critical role in supporting a vibrant transatlantic trade relationship. This sector is an essential driving force for many rural economies and for a significant number of medium and small enterprises. The undersigned deeply regret that the wine sector, as a notable industry in our two economies is sometimes caught in the crosshairs of unrelated trade disputes, causing economic damage to producers, and putting the millions of jobs that they support at risk. Consumers are also victims of those trading conflicts, which can lead to higher prices and reduced consumer choice. We urge the European Union and the US to resolve current trade disputes, to stop any related retaliatory action against wine exports, and to strengthen their bilateral partnership in order to avoid any sanctions against those sectors, including in the context of the current World Trade Organization Large Civil Aircraft Airbus-Boeing disputes. As legislators and policy makers on both sides of the Atlantic, we acknowledge the importance and benefits of strengthening this bilateral partnership. Both the U.S. and the EU are each other’s largest export markets, with the total wine trade reaching more than $5.3 billion (€4.5 billion) annually, creating jobs and investment and supporting sustainable agriculture on both sides of the Atlantic. We ask our governments to further support the economic vitality and diversity of our wine sectors by working to remove all tariffs on wine to achieve a “zero for zero” wine trade environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Rezultate Izbora Članova U Europski Parlament
    REPUBLIKA HRVATSKA DRŽAVNO IZBORNO POVJERENSTVO REPUBLIKE HRVATSKE KLASA: 013-08/19-01/70 URBROJ: 507-02/01-19-1 Zagreb, 27. svibnja 2019. Na osnovi članaka 56. i 57. Zakona o izboru članova u Europski parlament iz Republike Hrvatske ("Narodne novine", broj 92/10, 23/13 i 143/13, dalje: Zakon) Državno izborno povjerenstvo Republike Hrvatske, utvrdilo je i objavljuje REZULTATE IZBORA ČLANOVA U EUROPSKI PARLAMENT IZ REPUBLIKE HRVATSKE PROVEDENIH 26. SVIBNJA 2019. GODINE I. Od ukupno 3.696.907 birača, glasovalo je (prema glasačkim listićima) 1.103.551 birača, odnosno 29,85%. Važećih glasačkih listića utvrđeno je 1.073.954, odnosno 97,32%. Nevažećih glasačkih listića utvrđeno je 29.597, odnosno 2,68%. II. Pojedine kandidacijske liste i kandidati dobili su sljedeći broj glasova: 1. HRVATSKA DEMOKRATSKA ZAJEDNICA - HDZ 244.076 glasova 22,72% 1. KARLO RESSLER 52.859 glasova 21,65% 2. DUBRAVKA ŠUICA 31.791 glasova 13,02% 3. TOMISLAV SOKOL 4.573 glasova 1,87% 4. ŽELJANA ZOVKO 9.861 glasova 4,04% 5. SUNČANA GLAVAK 9.599 glasova 3,93% 6. MARIJANA BALIĆ 7.365 glasova 3,01% 7. GORAN PAUK 7.824 glasova 3,20% 8. NIKOLINA BRNJAC 2.198 glasova 0,90% 9. STJEPAN RIBIĆ 4.359 glasova 1,78% 10. DOMAGOJ MAROEVIĆ 6.974 glasova 2,85% 11. DANIJEL MARUŠIĆ 9.747 glasova 3,99% 12. STJEPAN ADANIĆ 4.146 glasova 1,69% 2. SOCIJALDEMOKRATSKA PARTIJA HRVATSKE - SDP 200.976 glasova 18,71% 1. TONINO PICULA 50.921 glasova 25,33% 2. BILJANA BORZAN 64.736 glasova 32,21% 3. PREDRAG FRED MATIĆ 13.371 glasova 6,65% 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Green Recovery Call to Action & Signatories 121
    GREENRECOVERY REBOOT & REBOOST our economies for a sustainable future Call for mobilisation The coronavirus crisis is shaking the whole world, with devastating consequences across Europe. We are being put to the test. We are suffering and mourning our losses, and this crisis is testing the limits of our system. It is also a test of our great European solidarity and of our institutions, which acted fast at the start of the crisis to deploy measures to protect us. The crisis is still ongoing, but we will see the light at the end of the tunnel, and by fighting together, we will beat the virus. Never have we faced such a challenging situation in peacetime. The fight against the pandemic is our top priority and everything that is needed to stop it and eradicate the virus must be done. We welcome and strongly support all the actions developed by governments, EU institutions, local authorities, scientists, medical staff, volunteers, citizens and economic actors. In this tremendously difficult situation, we are also facing another crisis: a shock to our economy tougher than the 2008 crisis. The major shock to the economy and workers created by the pandemic calls for a strong coordinated economic response. We therefore welcome the declaration of European leaders stating that they will do “whatever it takes” to tackle the social and economic consequences of this crisis. However, what worked for the 2008 financial crisis may not be sufficient to overcome this one. The economic recovery will only come with massive investments to protect and create jobs and to support all the companies, regions and sectors that have suffered from the economy coming to a sudden halt.
    [Show full text]
  • THE ROLE of CROATIA in the EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT Rolando Andrade Matamoro
    ISSN: 2560-1601 Vol. 20, No. 4 (HR) July 2019 Croatia external relations briefing: THE ROLE OF CROATIA IN THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT Rolando Andrade Matamoro 1052 Budapest Petőfi Sándor utca 11. +36 1 5858 690 Kiadó: Kína-KKE Intézet Nonprofit Kft. [email protected] Szerkesztésért felelős személy: Chen Xin Kiadásért felelős személy: Huang Ping china-cee.eu 2017/01 THE ROLE OF CROATIA IN THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT Summary Croatia elected twelve Members of the European Parliament (MEP) in the elections that took place in May 2019. Eleven MEPs have already taken their seats, while the twelfth MEP will go to the European Parliament (EP) once the United Kingdom leave the European Union. The eleven MEPs come from the following parties. Four are from the Croatian Democratic Union (HDZ) and they will join the European Peoples Party (EPP) group in the EP. Four were elected on the Social Democratic Party (SDP) list and they will join Socialists and Democrats (S&D) group in the EP. The remaining four were each elected from the following parties: the anti-systemic Human Blockade (Živi zid) and he will be a non-attached member of the EP; Mislav Kolakušić who was elected as an independent candidate and will also be non-attached in the EP; Ruža Tomašić who served in the previous mandate of the EP and was now reelected on the list of coalition of conservative parties – Croatian Sovereigns – will join the European Conservatives and Reformists Group; and Valter Flego from the Istrian Democratic Forum (IDS) party who will join the Renew Europe group (former ALDE).
    [Show full text]
  • Young Generations for the New Balkans 2030 Towards Alternative Horizons
    Young Generations for the New Balkans 2030 Towards Alternative Horizons • Goal: to explore alternatives to the actual situation in the region and clear the path to its European integration • Focus: new perspectives and vision of the youth from the Western Balkans • Project partners: International Institute for Peace in Vienna, Karl-Renner Institut and Austrian Institute for International Affairs • Format: meetings with public officials and experts in the EU and the region; workshops and panel discussions different European capitals. • Outputs: policy paper by young experts from the region VIENNA, May 2018 • Topic: current challenges in the region • Stakeholders: Michael Karnitschnig (Chief of Cabinet of Johannes Hahn), Wolfgang Bogensberger (Deputy Head of the European Commission Representation in Austria), Erhard Busek (Institut für den Donauraum und Mitteleuropa), Tanja Fajon (MEP), Ulrike Lunacek (former Vice President of the European Parliament and Rapporteur for Kosovo) VIENNA, November 2018 • Topics: reconciliation, emigration from the region, role of education in curing nationalism and corruption • Stakeholders: Jörg Wojahn (Representative of the European Commission in Austria), Tanja Fajon (MEP). Report of the meeting available here The HAGUE, December 2018 • Topics: education and migration • Stakeholders: Kati Piri (MEP) • In cooperation with the Embassy of Austria in the Hague and the Clingendael Foundation in The Hague Report of the meeting available here BELGRADE, PRISTINA, SKOPJE, March 2019 • Topics: emigration and reconciliation
    [Show full text]
  • News from Copenhagen
    News from Copenhagen Number 448 Current Information from the OSCE PA International Secretariat 3 October 2012 Georgian elections democratic despite polarizing campaign were respected overall, instances of harassment and intimidation of party activists and supporters negatively affected the campaign environment, and often ended with detentions and fines of mostly opposition-affiliated campaigners. This contributed to an atmosphere of distrust among contestants, the statement said. Prior to the election, OSCE PA President Riccardo Migliori had criticized the arrests of Georgian opposition figures and Tonino Picula delivers the post-election statement in Tbilisi. civil society activists. “Arrests and charges that would take political activists out of play during an election period must Delivering the post-election statement on behalf of the be taken seriously,” he said on 25 September. OSCE on Tuesday, Special Co-ordinator Tonino Picula Two days before the vote, amid a tense campaign (Croatia) said that Georgia’s parliamentary elections marked environment, all heads of the parliamentary delegations an important step in consolidating the conduct of democratic issued a joint statement calling for the elections to proceed elections, although certain key issues remain to be addressed. peacefully. “Political leaders should be chosen through the “Despite a very polarizing campaign that included harsh ballot box and not on the streets,” said the statement. rhetoric and shortcomings, the Georgian people have freely The OSCE PA’s delegation consisted of more than 50 expressed their will at the ballot box,” said Picula, who led observers, including nearly 40 MPs, who deployed around the the short-term OSCE observer mission and headed the OSCE country.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 03 Sept. 2014 How the Sakharov Prize 2014 Is Awarded Background Briefing in the Next 10 Days, the Nominations of the Sakharov
    1 03 Sept. 2014 How the Sakharov Prize 2014 is awarded Background briefing In the next 10 days, the nominations of the Sakharov Prize for Human Rights will be decided by the European Parliament. The prize is awarded to “honour exceptional individuals who combat intolerance, fanaticism and oppression.”1 Previous winners include Nelson Mandela, Reporters without Borders and Anatoli Marchenko. If you believe that Azerbaijani human rights defenders – who are now in jail following years of work on behalf of the rights of others, and most recently on a list of political prisoners in Azerbaijan (on which they are now included) – then let the MEPs who vote on this know. Nominations for the Sakharov Prize can be made by: Political groups in the European Parliament. Or At least 40 MEPs. The deadline for nominations is Thursday 18 September at 12:00 in Strasbourg. NOTE: In order to decide on a nominee from their group some political groups have internal deadlines in the course of the next week. The next days are crucial. We focus here on four important political groups which might to support this nomination: The EPP Social Democrats Liberals Greens 1Source: The European Union website: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/aboutparliament/en/00f3dd2249/Sakharov-Prize-for-Freedom-of-Thought.html 2 Once the nominations are been made, the Foreign Affairs and Development committees vote on a shortlist of three finalists. This happens on either Monday 6th or Tuesday 7th October 2014. The members list for the foreign affairs committee can be found here: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/committees/en/afet/members.html, while the development committee is here: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/committees/en/deve/members.html#menuzone.
    [Show full text]
  • En En Minutes
    European Parliament 2019-2024 Subcommittee on Security and Defence SEDE_PV(2021)0315_1 MINUTES Meeting of 15 March 2021, 13.45-15.45, and 16 March 2021, 10.30-12.00 and 13.45-16.15 and 16.45 – 18.15 BRUSSELS The meeting opened at 13.47 on Monday, 15 March 2021, with Nathalie Loiseau (Chair) presiding. 1. Adoption of agenda SEDE_OJ(2021)0315_1 The agenda was adopted in the form shown in these minutes. 2. Chair's announcements None. 3. Chair's announcements concerning coordinators’ decisions The final decisions of the SEDE Coordinators of 22 February 2021 were announced and no comments were received. 4. Approval of minutes of meetings of 27-28 January 2021 PV – PE680.911v01-00 The minutes were approved. Jointly with the Committee on Foreign Affairs and in association with the Delegation for relations with the NATO Parliamentary Assembly PV\1227174EN.docx PE689.845v01-00 EN United in diversityEN 5. Exchange of views with Jens STOLTENBERG, Secretary General of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) Speakers: Nathalie Loiseau, David McAllister, Jens Stoltenberg (NATO), Tom Vandenkendelaere, Arnaud Danjean, Sven Mikser, Petras Auštrevičius, Anna Bonfrisco, Anna Fotyga, Mick Wallace, Antonio López-Istúriz White, Tonino Picula, Mounir Satouri, Klemen Grošelj, Witold Jan Waszczykowski Jointly with the Committee on Transport and Tourism 6. EU Military concerns with the Regulation on the Single European Sky (SES II +) Exchange of view with: Jiří ŠEDIVÝ, Chief Executive of the European Defence Agency (EDA) General Claudio GRAZIANO, Chair of the EU Military Committee Speakers: Nathalie Loiseau, Karima Delli, General Claudio Graziano (EU Military Committee), Jiří Šedivý (EDA), Marian-Jean Marinescu, Costas Mavrides, Anna Bonfrisco, Markéta Gregorová, Petar Vitanov, Jan-Christoph Oetjen, Clare Daly The meeting adjourned at 15.55 and resumed on Tuesday 16 March 2021 at 10.30 with Nathalie Loiseau (Chair).
    [Show full text]
  • Question for Written Answer
    Question for written answer E-000268/2021 to the Commission Rule 138 Milan Brglez (S&D), Vilija Blinkevičiūtė (S&D), Biljana Borzan (S&D), Tonino Picula (S&D), Irena Joveva (Renew), István Ujhelyi (S&D), Tanja Fajon (S&D), Francisco Guerreiro (Verts/ALE), Hannes Heide (S&D), Olivier Chastel (Renew), Traian Băsescu (PPE), Elisabetta Gualmini (S&D), Bronis Ropė (Verts/ALE), Pernando Barrena Arza (The Left), Ljudmila Novak (PPE), Monika Beňová (S&D), Loránt Vincze (PPE), Delara Burkhardt (S&D), Manuel Pizarro (S&D), Marianne Vind (S&D), Isabel Carvalhais (S&D), Dietmar Köster (S&D), Romana Tomc (PPE), Frédérique Ries (Renew), Marek Paweł Balt (S&D), Radan Kanev (PPE), Franc Bogovič (PPE), Inese Vaidere (PPE), Janina Ochojska (PPE), Alex Agius Saliba (S&D), Margrete Auken (Verts/ALE), Emmanuel Maurel (The Left), Vlad Gheorghe (Renew), Miroslav Číž (S&D), Hildegard Bentele (PPE), Klemen Grošelj (Renew), Rovana Plumb (S&D), Maria-Manuel Leitão- Marques (S&D), Viola Von Cramon-Taubadel (Verts/ALE), Cyrus Engerer (S&D), Ignazio Corrao (Verts/ALE), Martin Buschmann (NI), Christel Schaldemose (S&D), Demetris Papadakis (S&D) Subject: Managing excessive amounts of plastic waste following the introduction of new EU rules on shipments of plastic waste On 1 January 2021, new EU rules entered into force banning the export of unsorted plastic waste from the EU to non‑OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) countries. In recent years, there has been a huge growth in the production of plastic and consequently the amount of plastic waste. Only around 30 % of plastic waste in the EU is collected for recycling.
    [Show full text]
  • European Elections Why Vote? English
    Europea2n E0lecti1ons9 THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT THE EUROPEAN ELECTIONS WHY VOTE? ENGLISH Croatia Results of the 26 May 2019 European elections Show 10 entries Search: Trend European Number of Percentage of Number of Political Parties compared affiliation votes votes seats with 2014 Croatian Democratic EPP 22.72% 4 Union - HDZ Social Democratic Party S&D 18.71% 3 of Croatia - SDP Coalition Sovereign ECR 8.51% 1 Croatian Mislav Kolakušić's list 7.89% 1 Human Shield 5.66% 1 Amsterdam Coalition Renew Europe 5.20% 1 Showing 1 to 6 of 6 entries Previous Next List of MEPs Karlo Ressler Croatian Democratic Union EPP Dubravka Šuica Croatian Democratic Union EPP Tomislav Sokol Croatian Democratic Union EPP Željana Zovko Croatian Democratic Union EPP Tonino Picula Social Democratic Party of Croatia S&D Biljana Borzan Social Democratic Party of Croatia S&D Predrag Fred Matić Social Democratic Party of Croatia S&D Valter Flego Amsterdam coalition Renew Europe Ruzo Tomašić Croation Sovereigns ECR Mislav Kolakušić Mislav Kolakušić's list Ivan Vilibor Sincic Human Shield Lists for the elections on 26 May Affiliation of a political Leading Name of party Translation Internet site Programme party or candidate group HDZ, Hrvatska Croatian Democratic EPP Karlo hdz.hr Programme Demokratska zajednica Union - HDZ Ressler HSS, Hrvatska seljacka Croatian Farmers’ Party - EPP Valter Flego hss.hr stranka HSS SDP, Socijaldemokratska Social Democratic Party of S&D Mirando sdp.hr Programme Partija Hrvatske Croatia Mrsić Amsterdam Coalition Member Affiliation
    [Show full text]
  • Letter to EU Commissioner on Health and Food Safety on Maternal Healthcare During the COVID19 Pandemic
    Mrs. Stella Kyriakides Commissioner for Health and Food Safety Dear Mrs. Kyriakides, EU Member States are dealing with unprecedented challenges arising from the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) and health systems are now focused on social distancing and avoidance of non-urgent, non-COVID-19 related medical care. Unfortunately, the strains on our health systems and the difficulties are not being borne equally by the population - pregnant women in particular - still require competent and compassionate labor, birth and postpartum care. We have been approached by the international NGO “Human Rights in Childbirth” regarding concerns about the negative consequences to labor and birth care as health systems focus on tackling COVID-19. In this time of a health crisis, changes are being made to the provision of pregnancy and birth care which are not based on scientific evidence, WHO guidelines or guidelines of relevant European professional organisations. Those changes are arguably unnecessary and, in many cases, not proportional to the response required to the COVID-19 pandemic. For example, we are informed that: • Maternity services are being de-prioritised with regards to adequate staffing, personal protective equipment for staff and access to needed resources • Community and out of hospital maternity services (including midwifery units and home birth) are being closed down without warning • Women are being forced to submit to unwanted inductions and scheduled caesarean sections with no obstetric indication • Women are being separated from their newborn infants • Women are being denied the right to a companion in labour and birth, as well as visitors All citizens are entitled to the protection of their right to the highest attainable level of health during this crisis.
    [Show full text]