Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Recreational Boating

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Recreational Boating 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 h g u Bascule lo S Br. S n o Marinas r d te g t r u a ISLAND ISLAND h 84 S s g s Marinas Actively Distributing and Collecting 4 u o l 5 A ISLAND A Absorbents for Free S Slough TWIN CITIES RD 35 S h l o Certified Used Oil Collection Centers, Free Drop Off C g u g a g ou t c l h h a a e h S o b S R m Swing Marinas with Sewage Pumpouts E a e T Br. t T S E13 S h 99 lo U u g u S g o r Marinas with Fuel Dock Open to the Public h LIBERTY l e h S g n u i lo M S PROSPECT D R s Bridges ow ad e ELM RD SIMMERHORN RD Y M R A t E 34 L 5 c Interstate Highway L e i HARVEY G A L T BOESSOW RD n p Bascule RD ds s C ST ay o r Br. AVE LINE Sl. P 15 CARO 84 RYER NEW HOPE RD 6 State Highway GRAND 17 R 14 Fixed IVER 220 RD RD W A L N U T Br. KOST RD B J9 ISLAND Howard Landing G R O V E B Cable Ferry VAIL County Roads RD LAUFFER RD Swing E VE Ferries E Br. L 31 LD O 42 NORTH R D C W WALNUT GROVE RD R 0 5 Miles a E D h ISLAND R c h g e V J11 u N o I l O 75 S T 71 E R L 0 W S 5 Kilometers I A LANDING RD NEW HOPE RD L KER J8 S 56 160 ISLAND l o TRACT u A g NDRUS I SL Slough J10 h . RD 113 McCORMACK t RD a h o g b u Y m o T 27 Stea l R E POVERTY RD S E eaver IB B L RD O RD Ryer Ferry T N a BLOSSOM an E E gi PELTIER RD ER r RY o J12 M e N C 12 G C A CANAL M AIRPORT R 84 TYLER U RD G C RD RA L RANCH ND A CHURCH RD RD 68 E STATEN S h VISTA IS oug LA Sl O RD T ND ISLAND K RD Bascule H N RD RD o g E AZEVEDO O M D CURRIE Br. A R Rio Vista Br. M ISLAND R C MAIN ST A BL ST N H R S O 6T WOODBRIDGE S RD K R I O C E BRACT A J A V I S T A N V D H E I S L E T O N DR I R W T G 20 O IN S B R D O D T X 46 TRACT R ER O R N N MINOU A S R W O O D B R I D G E L LLS D O HI N A ca TURNER M BRANNAN Sy mo RD D r R U e h EZ R ug D NT 160 12 lo S MO D S N D 17 A D IR L D R S 31 B I R D COTTA RD R AN L O D I E L L IS ISLAND H Y G T R E DAVIS S DEVRIES ST L LN U Y O T L O D S 11 D WEST 5 U LODI AV ile T evenm N T HAM S HUTCHINS S O 48 U M N S L TW ITCH K 16 E H E E Slo C L u A K L g J O 42 h WEST M SOUTH SOUTH ISL B CHURCH AN RD RA Sl. D N 18 N 57 A WEST KETTLEMAN e N 12 LN il m e TWITCHELL e Lift r 45 21 h T 64 RD Br. h 37 BOULDIN g 40 24 Swing u ISLAN 7 41 o D l 73 Br. R 51 S ISLAND D h NORTH d EAST HARNEY e 2 g D LN n l u R i e 44 o A l B U m 32 ISLAND S G e 50 N e r o DECKER lough t W h S a t h T RD RD T Potato o i H P O te R ISLAND T O hoe N Horses J9 AMSTRONG RD e l t BRADFORD t i S L l o R t WEBB u D u gh g Slou h C VENICE RD hite E W E ND LA Telephone Cut . IS TRACT ISLAND l ISLAND S N RD A n M o 18 i Fixed Br. R t ermans E n DAVIS H SHERMAN gto c EMPIRE KING S h in Cu e 24 s h t n i Swing s SACRAMENTO n BLANCO F a Swing 160 o Br. lse W 23 Fa C 30 Br. LN 55 RIO o 22 e l t EIGHT t MILE M R i Cable RD ISLAND ive L TRACT ISLAND SHERMAN ay r Venic Ferry nt b e e p e Cut r tm o W r D n h ISLAND y R i 47 o s E i I E p V a B N LE JERSEY iss J8 J10 T T D 29 38 ley Sl. E S Slough Pix Slou EA EMPIRE R gh T M C a A T y D MEDFORD R 19 M HO b T e A N I rr L o R S y IS MANDEVILLE T s O WEST . h N ugh AN Fixed Br. e Slo RM ISLAND r KI DONLAN SHE MB ISLAND Slough Antioch ALL ISLAND R Slough BETHEL ISLAND SHIMA D Br. h 4 IS tc T u K a RINDGE . D QUIMBY E V 45 IS. y t L 20 A l L WEST o ISLAND Cu E 9 r Y 35 t ia TRACT N F u b O F C um D KNICKERBOCKER DR 3 Slo ISLAND ol WEST HAMMER LN ug C h M D 36 lt E R A e TRACT D D 12 2 v R O FLEMING LN utch Slough 28 W AV 10 TH ST WILBUR AV D se E o L L o t I R N 14 V 41 C S AV u . o D MC DONALD 21 15 R IS n E R E n DR RD 38 C L e Used Oil Collection Centers M T E c A A ST 9 T t O ST 43 I L io S BIG BREAK L L n R D I DEL AI BL 10 18 TH ST V LT F O TA N Hog H L E A D S 27 E L N lo L S u Spud I A g 32 M h Island BENJAMIN D CREST 5 L O L Is. 23 I R H O A K L E Y LN 18 BROCK A RD P Cable D N 54 A L h O ISLAND RD HOLLAND SWAIN C H Swing Br. ARC 40 g I M TRACT F Y Ferry Lost Isle I T u C E R S D 4 N A D S E R o R l 25 R d HI E E C S N J BETHEL 30 S n A T I W HENNING B a O E CYPRESS TRACT l A L RD l V F T D D 13 P EAS IL NE o MILDRED W ut R 70 E A N T I O C H C R RO H h S g Bora Bora H V I LY Map Number Map Locator ed Used Oil Certifi Collection Center Address City Phone Number 53 u r ER N A e G D U LAUREL RD lo rn A Beach Mound B R u E LN S G A 22 Y ST BACON T U MARCH V W W d Y IN Dam NE E N RD m L n 33 G3 A and A Auto 6240 Brentwood Blvd Brentwood (925) 634-1188 E L a 76 A a 28 47 MA TRACT S V HOLLAND TRACT h 50 T RD 52 TULE LN S 49 N t O H S 2 F1 Andy's Vip Auto Service 901 A St. Ste A Antioch (925) 778-2930 a L G ISLAND Bridge I I 66 L W BROWNSTONE RD N Rock Slough K AV 63 DEER Empire Cut 3 G10 AutoZone #2858 1100 N. Wilson Wy Stockton (209) 942-2992 A DELTA RD 60 O WEST S T O C K T O N L 48 AV ON t W 26 4 F9 AutoZone #3326 2309 W. Hammer Ln Stockton (209) 477-9788 E u M I E G S G c PIN WAY L N T EMPIRE AV C L C A OHAR 1 D R N E Ferry Cable O O E N ING N D N ISLAND A RD 59 R HILLCREST AV D HA WY LD S 5 F3 Autozone #5309 2595 Main St Oakley (925) 625-8643 I E N W r L A 34 I I L e R D S g Swing Br. R P D O O d O 3 6 R N B10 AutoZone #5588 1018 C St. Ste 200 Galt (209) 745-7094 37 R e A r T D R 53 RD D O AV ST W Y Y 7 D10 AutoZone #5682 1300 W.
Recommended publications
  • 0 5 10 15 20 Miles Μ and Statewide Resources Office
    Woodland RD Name RD Number Atlas Tract 2126 5 !"#$ Bacon Island 2028 !"#$80 Bethel Island BIMID Bishop Tract 2042 16 ·|}þ Bixler Tract 2121 Lovdal Boggs Tract 0404 ·|}þ113 District Sacramento River at I Street Bridge Bouldin Island 0756 80 Gaging Station )*+,- Brack Tract 2033 Bradford Island 2059 ·|}þ160 Brannan-Andrus BALMD Lovdal 50 Byron Tract 0800 Sacramento Weir District ¤£ r Cache Haas Area 2098 Y o l o ive Canal Ranch 2086 R Mather Can-Can/Greenhead 2139 Sacramento ican mer Air Force Chadbourne 2034 A Base Coney Island 2117 Port of Dead Horse Island 2111 Sacramento ¤£50 Davis !"#$80 Denverton Slough 2134 West Sacramento Drexler Tract Drexler Dutch Slough 2137 West Egbert Tract 0536 Winters Sacramento Ehrheardt Club 0813 Putah Creek ·|}þ160 ·|}þ16 Empire Tract 2029 ·|}þ84 Fabian Tract 0773 Sacramento Fay Island 2113 ·|}þ128 South Fork Putah Creek Executive Airport Frost Lake 2129 haven s Lake Green d n Glanville 1002 a l r Florin e h Glide District 0765 t S a c r a m e n t o e N Glide EBMUD Grand Island 0003 District Pocket Freeport Grizzly West 2136 Lake Intake Hastings Tract 2060 l Holland Tract 2025 Berryessa e n Holt Station 2116 n Freeport 505 h Honker Bay 2130 %&'( a g strict Elk Grove u Lisbon Di Hotchkiss Tract 0799 h lo S C Jersey Island 0830 Babe l Dixon p s i Kasson District 2085 s h a King Island 2044 S p Libby Mcneil 0369 y r !"#$5 ·|}þ99 B e !"#$80 t Liberty Island 2093 o l a Lisbon District 0307 o Clarksburg Y W l a Little Egbert Tract 2084 S o l a n o n p a r C Little Holland Tract 2120 e in e a e M Little Mandeville
    [Show full text]
  • Transitions for the Delta Economy
    Transitions for the Delta Economy January 2012 Josué Medellín-Azuara, Ellen Hanak, Richard Howitt, and Jay Lund with research support from Molly Ferrell, Katherine Kramer, Michelle Lent, Davin Reed, and Elizabeth Stryjewski Supported with funding from the Watershed Sciences Center, University of California, Davis Summary The Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta consists of some 737,000 acres of low-lying lands and channels at the confluence of the Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers (Figure S1). This region lies at the very heart of California’s water policy debates, transporting vast flows of water from northern and eastern California to farming and population centers in the western and southern parts of the state. This critical water supply system is threatened by the likelihood that a large earthquake or other natural disaster could inflict catastrophic damage on its fragile levees, sending salt water toward the pumps at its southern edge. In another area of concern, water exports are currently under restriction while regulators and the courts seek to improve conditions for imperiled native fish. Leading policy proposals to address these issues include improvements in land and water management to benefit native species, and the development of a “dual conveyance” system for water exports, in which a new seismically resistant canal or tunnel would convey a portion of water supplies under or around the Delta instead of through the Delta’s channels. This focus on the Delta has caused considerable concern within the Delta itself, where residents and local governments have worried that changes in water supply and environmental management could harm the region’s economy and residents.
    [Show full text]
  • Fall 2015 CCSDA Newsletter
    Contra Costa Special Districts Association Newsletter Contra Costa Chapter of the California Special Districts Association Fall 2015 October 2015 Ironhouse Sanitary District General Ironhouse new General Manager Manager Tom Williams Retires Chad Davisson, the new General Manager for Ironhouse You don’t have to look too hard to see the changes, Sanitary District (ISD), started on July 13, 2015. Chad innovations and conservation techniques that Tom comes to the District with over 25 years of wastewater Williams has helped bring to Ironhouse Sanitary District industry experience. (ISD) during his 15 years there, including the past 10 as He also has 10 years of general manager. It is those lasting contributions that executive level organization Williams leaves behind. management experience. He has a Bachelor of Arts Congratulations Degree in Public Administration Tom Williams for 15 from San Diego State University and is scheduled to receive his years’ service, ten MBA Degree from Saint Mary’s College in Moraga January years as Manager! 2016. He served as the General Manager of the Richmond First hired as the district’s engineer under the Municipal Sewer District, worked for the City of San leadership of then GM David Bauer, Williams dove in Mateo as the Environmental Services Division Manager, on existing projects around the old treatment plant. the Water Reclamation Systems Plant Manager for When Bauer retired, Williams easily made the transition Olivenhain Water District and the Industrial Waste to overseeing the day-to-day operations of the district. Control Representative for the County of San Diego. One of his first major projects was building a railroad He has also worked as a consultant for Crescent City, undercrossing to safely bring workers and the public the City of Ontario, the City of Montclair and the past what had been a non-signalized grade crossing Olivenhain Municipal Water District.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Sacramento River Summary Report August 4Th-5Th, 2008
    Upper Sacramento River Summary Report August 4th-5th, 2008 California Department of Fish and Game Heritage and Wild Trout Program Prepared by Jeff Weaver and Stephanie Mehalick Introduction: The 400-mile long Sacramento River system is the largest watershed in the state of California, encompassing the McCloud, Pit, American, and Feather Rivers, and numerous smaller tributaries, in total draining nearly one-fifth of the state. From the headwaters downstream to Shasta Lake, referred to hereafter as the Upper Sacramento, this portion of the Sacramento River is a designated Wild Trout Water (with the exception of a small section near the town of Dunsmuir, which is a stocked put-and-take fishery) (Figure 1). The California Department of Fish and Game’s (DFG) Heritage and Wild Trout Program (HWTP) monitors this fishery through voluntary angler survey boxes, creel census, direct observation snorkel surveys, electrofishing surveys, and habitat analyses. The HWTP has repeated sampling over time in a number of sections to obtain trend data related to species composition, trout densities, and habitat condition to aid in the management of this popular sport fishery. In August 2008, the HWTP resurveyed four historic direct observation survey sections on the Upper Sacramento. Methods: Surveys occurred between August 4th and 5th, 2008 with the aid of HWTP personnel and DFG volunteers. Sections were identified prior to the start of the surveys using GPS coordinates, written directions, and past experience. Fish were counted via direct observation snorkel surveys, an effective survey technique in many streams and creeks in California and the Pacific Northwest (Hankin & Reeves, 1988).
    [Show full text]
  • Countywide Reclamation Services
    Countywide Reclamation Services Municipal Service Review/Sphere of Influence Update (2nd Round) Contra Costa Local Agency Formation Commission DRAFT Countywide Reclamation Services MSR/SOI (2nd Round) Contra Costa LAFCO PREPARED FOR: CONTRA COSTA LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION _____________________________________________________________________________________ COMMISSIONERS Don Tatzin, City Member Rob Schroder, City Member Federal Glover, County Member Mary Piepho, County Member Donald Blubaugh, Public Member Michael McGill, Special District Member Igor Skaredoff, Special District Member ALTERNATE COMMISSIONERS Tom Butt, City Member Candace Andersen, County Member Sharon Burke, Public Member Stan Caldwell, Special District Member STAFF Lou Ann Texeira, Executive Officer Kate Sibley, Executive Assistant/LAFCO Clerk 1 Countywide Reclamation Services MSR/SOI (2nd Round) Contra Costa LAFCO Table of Contents I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................... 10 II. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................... 16 Local Agency Formation Commissions (LAFCOs) .................................................................................... 16 Municipal Service Reviews ...................................................................................................................... 16 Spheres of Influence ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • March, 1969 Idly, All Through the 1970'S Assuming Relatively Full Employment Nationally and the Continuing High Level of Economic Activity Needed to Achieve This Goal
    n rtn· 70's "Serving the men who move the earth!" * * * ENGINEERS NEWS Apprentice Method .....SHED TO ••OMOll , •• GENERAL WELfARE OF ... ENGINEERS ~N. THEIR FAMILIES Still Key To Entry By· AL CLEM International Vice President · Business Manager and Editor Employment of operating engineers is expected to increase rap­ Vol. 28-No. 3 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA March, 1969 idly, all through the 1970's assuming relatively full employment nationally and the continuing high level of economic activity needed to achieve this goal. An estimated 250,000 were employed as excavating, grading and road machinery operators in early 1967, and many thousands more of these operating engineers.held jobs as operators of other types of construction machinery such as cranes, derricks, hoists, diesel engines, air-compressors, trenchpipe layers and dredges. Thousands of additional oppor­ tunities will come in the years just as the best way to qualify for ·immediately ahead because of the journeymen status as an operating anticipated growth in consb·uction engineer. Many men with mechan­ ical aptitude do enter this occupa­ $ activity, and the growing volume of highway work along with main­ tion by obtaining jobs as oilers tenance and ·repair will be espe­ (operating engineers' assistant) or cially important in the develop­ as helpers to heavy equipment re­ ment of employment. pairmen. Workers on these jobs The trend toward the increasing gain a knowledge of the ma­ use of construction machinery chinery, how to keep it · in good shows every indication of continu­ running order and how to make ing. repairs. Oilers and helpers must We must also take into account perform their work well and dern­ technological development.
    [Show full text]
  • Bethel Island Area of Benefit
    Julia R. Bueren, Director Deputy Directors R. Mitch Avalon Brian M. Balbas Stephen Kowalewski Stephen Silveira ADOPTED BY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON ___________________ Development Program Report for the Bethel Island Area of Benefit August, 2016 Prepared Pursuant to Section 913 of the County Ordinance Code Prepared by and for: Contra Costa County Public Works Department, Transportation Engineering Division and Department of Conservation and Development, Community Development Division "Accredited by the American Public Works Association" 255 Glacier Drive Martinez, CA 94553-4825 TEL: (925) 313-2000 FAX: (925) 313-2333 www.cccpublicworks.org Development Program Report for the Bethel Island Area of Benefit Table of Contents CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE ............................................................... 1 CHAPTER 2: BACKGROUND ........................................................................................... 2 CHAPTER 3: LOCATION AND BOUNDARY .................................................................... 3 CHAPTER 4: GENERAL PLAN RELATIONSHIP ............................................................... 3 CHAPTER 5: PROJECT LIST ........................................................................................... 4 CHAPTER 6: DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL ..................................................................... 5 CHAPTER 7: ESTIMATED COST OF ROAD IMPROVEMENTS .......................................... 6 CHAPTER 8: METHOD OF COST APPORTIONMENT ......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • San Joaquin River Riparian Habitat Below Friant Dam: Preservation and Restoration1
    SAN JOAQUIN RIVER RIPARIAN HABITAT BELOW FRIANT DAM: PRESERVATION AND RESTORATION1 Donn Furman2 Abstract: Riparian habitat along California's San Joa- quin River in the 25 miles between Friant Darn and Free- Table 1 – Riparian wildlife/vegetation way 99 occurs on approximately 6 percent of its his- corridor toric range. It is threatened directly and indirectly by Corridor Corridor increased urban encroachment such as residential hous- Category Acres Percent ing, certain recreational uses, sand and gravel extraction, Water 1,088 14.0 aquiculture, and road construction. The San Joaquin Trees 588 7.0 River Committee was formed in 1985 to advocate preser- Shrubs 400 5.0 Other riparianl 1,844 23.0 vation and restoration of riparian habitat. The Com- Sensitive Biotic2 101 1.5 mittee works with local school districts to facilitate use Agriculture 148 2.0 of riverbottom riparian forest areas for outdoor envi- Recreation 309 4.0 ronmental education. We recently formed a land trust Sand and gravel 606 7.5 called the San Joaquin River Parkway and Conservation Riparian buffer 2,846 36.0 Trust to preserve land through acquisition in fee and ne- Total 7,900 100.0 gotiation of conservation easements. Opportunities for 1 Land supporting riparian-type vegetation. In increasing riverbottom riparian habitat are presented by most cases this land has been mined for sand and gravel, and is comprised of lands from which sand and gravel have been extracted. gravel ponds. 2 Range of a Threatened or Endangered plant or animal species. Study Area The majority of the undisturbed riparian habitat lies between Friant Dam and Highway 41 beyond the city limits of Fresno.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    INTRODUCTION The purpose of this book is twofold: to provide general information for anyone interested in the California islands and to serve as a field guide for visitors to the islands. The book covers both general history and nat- ural history, from the geological origins of the islands through their aboriginal inhabitants and their marine and terrestrial biotas. Detailed coverage of the flora and fauna of one island alone would completely fill a book of this size; hence only the most common, most readily observed, and most interesting species are included. The names used for the plants and animals discussed in this book are the most up-to-date ones available, based on the scientific literature and the most recently published guidebooks. Common names are always subject to local variations, and they change constantly. Where two names are in common use, they are both mentioned the first time the organism is discussed. Ironically, in recent years scientific names have changed more recently than common names, and the reader concerned about a possible discrepancy in nomenclature should consult the scientific literature. If a significant nomenclatural change has escaped our notice, we apologize. For plants, our primary reference has been The Jepson Manual: Higher Plants of California, edited by James C. Hickman, including the latest lists of errata. Variation from the nomenclature in that volume is due to more recent interpretations, as explained in the text. Certain abbreviations used throughout the text may not be immedi- ately familiar to the general reader; they are as follows: sp., species (sin- gular); spp., species (plural); n.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Environmental Assessment for the Shiloh Iii Wind Plant Project Habitat Conservation Plan
    DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR THE SHILOH III WIND PLANT PROJECT HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN P REPARED BY: U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service 2800 Cottage Way, W-2650 Sacramento, CA 95825 Contact: Mike Thomas, Chief Habitat Conservation Planning Branch W ITH TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE FROM: ICF International 630 K Street, Suite 400 Sacramento, CA 95814 Contact: Brad Schafer 916.737.3000 February 2011 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2011. Draft Environmental Assessment for the Shiloh III Wind Plant Project Habitat Conservation Plan. February. (ICF 00263.09). Sacramento, CA. With technical assistance from ICF International, Sacramento, CA. Contents Chapter 1 Purpose and Need ........................................................................................................... 1‐1 1.1 Background ................................................................................................................................ 1‐1 1.2 Species Covered by the HCP ...................................................................................................... 1‐2 1.3 Proposed Action Addressed in this EA ....................................................................................... 1‐2 1.4 Purpose of and Need for the Proposed Action .......................................................................... 1‐2 Chapter 2 Proposed Action and Alternatives .................................................................................. 2‐1 2.1 Alternative 1: Proposed Action .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Structured Decision Making for Delta Smelt Demo Project
    Structured Decision Making for Delta Smelt Demo Project Prepared for CSAMP/CAMT Project funded by State and Federal Water Contractors Prepared by Graham Long and Sally Rudd Compass Resource Management Ltd. 604.641.2875 Suite 210- 111 Water Street Vancouver, British Columbia Canada V6B 1A7 www.compassrm.com Date May 4, 2018 April 13th – reviewed by TWG and comments incorporated Table of Contents Table of Contents ............................................................................................................... i Executive Summary .......................................................................................................... iii Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 1 Approach .......................................................................................................................... 1 Problem Definition ........................................................................................................... 4 Objectives ......................................................................................................................... 5 Alternatives ...................................................................................................................... 9 Evaluation of Trade-offs ................................................................................................. 17 Discussion and Recommendations ................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Historic, Recent, and Future Subsidence, Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, California, USA
    UC Davis San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science Title Historic, Recent, and Future Subsidence, Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, California, USA Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7xd4x0xw Journal San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science, 8(2) ISSN 1546-2366 Authors Deverel, Steven J Leighton, David A Publication Date 2010 DOI https://doi.org/10.15447/sfews.2010v8iss2art1 Supplemental Material https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7xd4x0xw#supplemental License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ 4.0 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California august 2010 Historic, Recent, and Future Subsidence, Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, California, USA Steven J. Deverel1 and David A. Leighton Hydrofocus, Inc., 2827 Spafford Street, Davis, CA 95618 AbStRACt will range from a few cm to over 1.3 m (4.3 ft). The largest elevation declines will occur in the central To estimate and understand recent subsidence, we col- Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta. From 2007 to 2050, lected elevation and soils data on Bacon and Sherman the most probable estimated increase in volume below islands in 2006 at locations of previous elevation sea level is 346,956,000 million m3 (281,300 ac-ft). measurements. Measured subsidence rates on Sherman Consequences of this continuing subsidence include Island from 1988 to 2006 averaged 1.23 cm year-1 increased drainage loads of water quality constitu- (0.5 in yr-1) and ranged from 0.7 to 1.7 cm year-1 (0.3 ents of concern, seepage onto islands, and decreased to 0.7 in yr-1). Subsidence rates on Bacon Island from arability.
    [Show full text]