DOCSLIB.ORG

Preliminary Risk Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Preliminary Risk Assessment West Yorkshire Police Bishopgarth, Westfield Road, Wakefield Preliminary risk assessment 301469 JULY 2014 RSK GENERAL NOTES Project No.: 301469-01 (00) Title: Preliminary risk assessment: Bishopgarth, Westfield Road, Wakefield Client: West Yorkshire Police Date: July 2014 Office: Castleford Tel: 01977 552255, contact: John Harrison Status: Final Author Jennifer Wood Technical reviewer Paul Taunton Signature pp Signature Date: July 2014 Date: July 2014 Quality reviewer Project manager John Harrison [optional] Signature Signature Date: July 2014 Date: RSK Environment Limited (RSK) has prepared this report for the sole use of the client, showing reasonable skill and care, for the intended purposes as stated in the agreement under which this work was completed. The report may not be relied upon by any other party without the express agreement of the client and RSK. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the professional advice included in this report. Where any data supplied by the client or from other sources have been used, it has been assumed that the information is correct. No responsibility can be accepted by RSK for inaccuracies in the data supplied by any other party. The conclusions and recommendations in this report are based on the assumption that all relevant information has been supplied by those bodies from whom it was requested. No part of this report may be copied or duplicated without the express permission of RSK and the party for whom it was prepared. Where field investigations have been carried out, these have been restricted to a level of detail required to achieve the stated objectives of the work. This work has been undertaken in accordance with the quality management system of RSK Environment Ltd. CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................................. 3 1.1 Background.............................................................................................................................. 3 1.2 Objective .................................................................................................................................. 3 1.3 Scope....................................................................................................................................... 3 1.4 Existing reports ........................................................................................................................ 4 2 THE SITE......................................................................................................................................... 5 2.1 Site location and description.................................................................................................... 5 2.2 Proposed development............................................................................................................ 5 3 PRELIMINARY RISK ASSESSMENT (PRA).................................................................................. 6 3.1 Site walkover............................................................................................................................ 6 3.1.1 Environmental .............................................................................................................. 6 3.1.2 Geotechnical/ Structural............................................................................................... 7 3.2 Ground conditions.................................................................................................................... 7 3.2.1 Geology........................................................................................................................ 7 3.2.2 Radon........................................................................................................................... 8 3.2.3 Mining and quarrying ................................................................................................... 8 3.2.4 Landfilling and land reclamation .................................................................................. 8 3.2.5 Ground gas .................................................................................................................. 8 3.3 Hydrogeology........................................................................................................................... 8 3.3.1 Aquifer characteristics.................................................................................................. 8 3.3.2 Vulnerability of groundwater resources ....................................................................... 9 3.3.3 Licensed groundwater abstraction............................................................................... 9 3.4 Hydrology............................................................................................................................... 10 3.4.1 Surface watercourses ................................................................................................ 10 3.4.2 Surface water abstractions ........................................................................................ 10 3.4.3 Site drainage.............................................................................................................. 10 3.4.4 Preliminary flood risk assessment ............................................................................. 10 3.5 History of site and surrounding area...................................................................................... 10 3.6 Sensitive land uses ................................................................................................................ 12 3.7 Licences and permissions...................................................................................................... 12 3.8 Initial conceptual model ......................................................................................................... 12 3.8.1 Summary of potential contaminant sources............................................................... 12 3.8.2 Sensitive receptors .................................................................................................... 12 3.8.3 Summary of plausible pathways ................................................................................ 12 3.8.4 Potentially complete pollutant linkages...................................................................... 14 4 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS............................................................................. 17 4.1 Environmental and Geotechnical........................................................................................... 17 4.2 Other ...................................................................................................................................... 17 BIBLIOGRAPHY .................................................................................................................................. 18 West Yorkshire Police 1 Preliminary risk assessment: Bishopgarth, Westfield Lane, Wakefield 301469-01 (00) TABLES Table 1: Site setting................................................................................................................................ 5 Table 2: Geology at the site.................................................................................................................... 7 Table 3: Groundwater abstractions ........................................................................................................ 9 Table 4: Surface water abstractions..................................................................................................... 10 FIGURES Figure 1 Site location map Figure 2 Site layout plan Figure 3 Initial conceptual site model APPENDICES Appendix A Service constraints Appendix B Summary of legislation and policy relating to contaminated land Appendix C Walkover checklist Appendix D British Geological Survey borehole records Appendix E Environmental database report Appendix F Risk assessment methodology West Yorkshire Police 2 Preliminary risk assessment: Bishopgarth, Westfield Lane, Wakefield 301469-01 (00) 1 INTRODUCTION RSK Environment Limited (RSK) was commissioned by West Yorkshire Police to carry out a preliminary risk assessment of land at Bishopgarth, Westfield Road, Wakefield. It is understood that the site is being considered for residential development. This report is subject to the RSK service constraints given in Appendix A. 1.1 Background The site is currently occupied by an active training facility comprising several buildings, areas of soft landscaping and hardstanding areas. We understand that the majority of the buildings on the site are likely to be demolished. 1.2 Objective The objective of the PRA is to identify potential liabilities associated with redevelopment of the site. The aim of the PRA is to collate information pertaining to the site from which sources of contamination, receptors that may be impacted and pathways between the two are identified. Where all three are present, these are termed potentially complete contaminant linkages. In accordance with UK guidance including CLR11 and BS 10175, these are presented in a conceptual model and an evaluation of the risk associated with each contaminant linkage is made. 1.3 Scope The scope of the investigation and layout of this report has been designed with consideration of CLR11 (Environment Agency, 2004) and BS 10175: 2011 (BSI, 2011) and guidance on land contamination reports issued by the Environment Agency (EA) (2010). The project was carried out to an agreed
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ridings Shopping Centre
    RIDINGS SHOPPING CENTRE WAKEFIELD, WF1 1DS RIDINGS SHOPPING CENTRE WAKEFIELD, WF1 1DS 2.7m people living within a 24 hour 20 mile radius multi-storey car park 236,500 318,900 footfall per week total sq ft Bus dominant mode 12.3m of transport footfall p.a. 327,600 1,050 110 wakefield district parking spaces units population Source: CACI’s Retail Footprint, 2017 Off-Peak NewRiver Exit Surveys RIDINGS SHOPPING CENTRE WAKEFIELD, WF1 1DS TOWN CENTRE STATISTICS 2,326,388 £241.7m p.a. £5,074 p.a. 45-54 20 mins train–time 10 mins walk total retail catchment comparison goods spend average household comparison goods spend typical age profile (highest spend) to Leeds to Wakefield Train Station M621 MORLEY M1 A653 12 miles to Leeds Birstall M62 A654 A656 A6029 Tingley A650 M62 (J29) A6032 A652 CASTLEFORD Lofthouse Gate Batley A655 A653 Stanley M62 A6539 EDINBURGH A642 Normanton GLASGOW M1 A650 DEWSBURY Ridings Shopping Centre Wakefield Westgate Station Trinity Walk Shopping Centre NEWCASTLE BELFAST Ossett WAKEFIELD Halfords Wakefield Kirkgate Station FEATHERSTONE A61 LEEDS A638 MANCHESTER LIVERPOOL A6186 A642 < 3.5 miles to M1 (J40) CARDIFF LONDON BRISTOL Drivetime Key Kinsley A636 BRIGHTON M1 5 minute – 34,234 catchment < 14 miles to Huddersfield 10 minute – 108,022 catchment A636 Hemsworth Source: CACI’s Retail Footprint, 2017 Off-Peak NewRiver Exit Surveys RIDINGS SHOPPING CENTRE WAKEFIELD, WF1 1DS UPPER MALL ANCHOR RETAILERS UNIT RETAILER SQ FT 56-62 Bishopgate Walk Primark 30,600 90-93 Cathedral Walk TK Maxx – TO LET Kirkgate TO LET TO LET TO LET
    [Show full text]
  • Ridings Shopping Centre Wakefield, Wf1 1Ds
    RIDINGS SHOPPING CENTRE WAKEFIELD, WF1 1DS COMMERCIAL PREMISES AVAILABLE RIDINGS SHOPPING CENTRE WAKEFIELD, WF1 1DS 2.7m people living within a 24 hour 20 mile radius multi-storey car park 236,500 318,900 footfall per week total sq ft Bus dominant mode 12.3m of transport footfall p.a. 327,600 1,050 110 wakefield district parking spaces units population Source: CACI’s Retail Footprint, 2017 Off-Peak NewRiver Exit Surveys RIDINGS SHOPPING CENTRE WAKEFIELD, WF1 1DS TOWN CENTRE STATISTICS 2,326,388 £241.7m p.a. £5,074 p.a. 45-54 20 mins train–time 10 mins walk total retail catchment comparison goods spend average household comparison goods spend typical age profile (highest spend) to Leeds to Wakefield Train Station M621 MORLEY M1 A653 12 miles to Leeds Birstall M62 A654 A656 A6029 Tingley A650 M62 (J29) A6032 A652 CASTLEFORD Lofthouse Gate Batley A655 A653 Stanley M62 A6539 EDINBURGH A642 Normanton GLASGOW M1 A650 DEWSBURY Ridings Shopping Centre Wakefield Westgate Station Trinity Walk Shopping Centre NEWCASTLE BELFAST Ossett WAKEFIELD Halfords Wakefield Kirkgate Station FEATHERSTONE A61 LEEDS A638 MANCHESTER LIVERPOOL A6186 A642 < 3.5 miles to M1 (J40) CARDIFF LONDON BRISTOL Drivetime Key Kinsley A636 BRIGHTON M1 5 minute – 34,234 catchment < 14 miles to Huddersfield 10 minute – 108,022 catchment A636 Hemsworth Source: CACI’s Retail Footprint, 2017 Off-Peak NewRiver Exit Surveys RIDINGS SHOPPING CENTRE WAKEFIELD, WF1 1DS UPPER MALL ANCHOR RETAILERS UNIT RETAILER SQ FT 56-62 Bishopgate Walk Primark 30,600 90-93 Cathedral Walk TK Maxx – TO LET
    [Show full text]
  • Newriver REIT Plc Annual Report and Accounts 2018
    & Annual Report 2018 Accounts and NewRiver REIT plc Annual Report and Accounts 2018 NewRiver REIT plc (‘NewRiver’) is a Premium Listed REIT on the Main Market of the London Stock Exchange and a constituent of the FTSE 250 and EPRA indices. Founded in 2009, we specialise in buying, managing, developing and recycling convenience-led, community-focused retail and leisure assets. Our high-quality and conveniently located portfolio provides value for money on essential goods and services to consumers across the UK, and our affordable rents and high footfall locations create desirable and profitable trading opportunities for our occupiers. It is our fundamental belief that affordability for occupiers, and not lease length, means sustainability for our business. With an experienced management team and proven business model, we have a track record of delivering growing and sustainable cash returns to our shareholders and creating thriving communities across the UK. CONTENTS Strategic Report Financial Highlights IFC Our Business at a Glance 04 Chairman’s Review 08 Our Business Model 10 Our Marketplace 12 Leveraging our Key Relationships 16 CEO Review 18 OUR FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS Our Strategy 24 Our KPIs 26 Property Review 32 Gross income Funds From Operations Financial Review 56 (proportionally consolidated) Our People 68 ESG Report 69 Risk Management Report 74 £107.0m £60.3m Governance FY17: £106.7m FY17: £58.2m Board of Directors 78 Corporate Governance Report 80 Audit Committee Report 85 FFO per share Ordinary dividend per share Nomination Committee
    [Show full text]
  • CCG Annual Report 2016-17 TEMPLATE V7
    Annual Report 2018/19 1 Contents PERFORMANCE REPORT ..................................................................................................... 3 Performance Overview .............................................................................................. 11 Performance analysis ................................................................................................ 27 ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT ................................................................................................. 49 Corporate Governance Report .................................................................................. 50 Members Report ................................................................................................... 50 Statement of Accountable Officer’s Responsibilities ........................................ 56 Governance Statement ......................................................................................... 58 Remuneration and Staff Report ................................................................................ 82 Remuneration Report ........................................................................................... 82 Staff Report ........................................................................................................... 87 Parliamentary Accountability and Audit Report ...................................................... 97 ANNUAL ACCOUNTS ............................................................................................................ 102 2 PERFORMANCE
    [Show full text]
  • Engagement Report January 2021
    ENGAGEMENT REPORT BASELINE STAGE REPORT March to August 2020 September 2020 WAKEFIELD CITY CENTRE MASTERPLAN 1 Introduction This report has been prepared by UK Networks on behalf of Farrells and summarises the consultation undertaken during the Stage 1 Baseline Report on the Wakefield City Centre Masterplan, specifically; • The approach to consultation and engagement • Consultation and engagement activity undertaken between March - August 2020 • A high-level summary of feedback received from stakeholders and the general public regarding their views on the future of Wakefield City Centre during that time The report only relates to the Stage one (Baseline report) and provides a summary only. Further information containing all feedback received can be found in the main report. Feedback received during this stage will be used to inform Farrell’s work on the Wakefield City Centre Masterplan, which will be consulted on separately early next year in 2021. Key considerations In preparing the consultation and engagement strategy the following considerations were given to: • Respecting Government advice on social distancing, protecting the NHS and keeping vulnerable people safe during the current Covid 19 pandemic • The Government’s Chief Planner’s advice to councils (March/April 2020) • Wakefield Council’s Adopted Statement of Community Involvement (November 2017) • Previous consultations undertaken in relation to Wakefield City Centre • The use of digital technology to overcome the restrictions and to help engage a much wider audience than traditional means typically do. Targeted stakeholder groups Public sector organisations Amenity organisations Councillors Transport operators Cultural organisations Residents City Centre Taskforce Parish councils Business groups Local businesses Education institutions Community organisations Major landowners Member of Parliament Retailers Visitors to Wakefield Regional and local Media There were two parts to the Stage One consultation: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Rent: £10,000 PA Ground Floor Area 608 Sq Ft / 57 Sq M
    Leeds Office: 0113 388 4848 Manchester Office: 0161 631 2852 SHOPPING CENTRE PROPERTY / CLASS A1 1 Almshouse Lane The Ridings Shopping Centre, Wakefield WF1 1DS Rent: £10,000 PA Ground Floor Area 608 Sq ft / 57 Sq M Viewing Strictly through the joint letting agents. Barker Proudlove Jackson Criss Jonathan Newns Phil Coombes Richard Webster Mob: 07796 686469 Mob: 07715 678426 Tel: 0113 819 8998 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Mob: 07739 680 472 Email: [email protected] www.barkerproudlove.co.uk Page: 1 Leeds Office: 0113 388 4848 Manchester Office: 0161 631 2852 Location: Service Charge: With 110 stores The Ridings centre, Wakefield totals The on-account service charge for the year 2020 is circa 320,000 sq.ft of covered retail and leisure space. available on request. REEL Cinema have recently opened joining existing EPC: anchor stores such as M&S, Boots, Primark and TK Energy Performance Asset Rating - Available on Maxx. Furthermore there is The Garden Food Court request and The Den childrens play area. Legal Costs: Each party to be responsible for their own legal and Accommodation: professional costs incurred in this transaction. The premises comprise the following approximate net VAT: internal floor areas: Unless otherwise stated, all prices/rents are quoted Demise: Sq Ft Sq M exclusive of VAT. Ground Floor 608 56.5 Date Prepared: Rent: June 2020 We are seeking rental offers in the order of £10,000 Subject to Contract per annum exclusive. Tenure: The premises are available by way of a new 10 year lease on effective FRI terms.
    [Show full text]
  • A Prospectus for Wakefield Business Improvement District 2017 to 2022
    A Prospectus for Wakefield Business Improvement District 2017 to 2022. www.wakefieldbid.co.uk all feel the benefit of the ripple. By working collaboratively a BID gives us a chance to do some very radical things and make people see Chair’s intro’ Wakefield differently. Our cumulative investment will provide a business-driven focus to ensure that ‘Wakefield BID Steering Group’ was established in 2015 by a group of Wakefield starts to take advantage of its businesses who recognised that Wakefield is a great place to do business key assets and its businesses, raise its profile but could be even better if we came together with other businesses and and in turn provide essential support to its organisations as partners, with a sense of pride and determination. businesses. This investment will also set Wakefield has a heritage based upon the woollen mills and the coal mines but standards in the city which reflect and are in this is hidden from view and the city does not really celebrate its past. However line with our own aspirations as businesses there is a sense of new and innovative growth and enthusiasm from businesses with a budget, over the five year BID lifetime in the city who want to bring Wakefield into a new era. We are enticing new of over £1.5 million. We believe this will make visitors to Wakefield from outside and slowly tempting people to stay in the a positive difference to your bottom line as city after work. There is a very positive outlook and the BID could help us a business in Wakefield.
    [Show full text]
  • Newriver REIT Plc Environmental, Social & Governance Report 2019
    DUMFRIES NEWBURGH WANTAGE BRISTOL KIRKDALE TEWKESBURY NECHELLS THETFORD FARNHAM DONCASTER ROCHFORD ALSTON CLOWNE EVESHAM GLEMSFORD SUDBURY SOUTHSEA LOCHGILPHEAD WIRRAL ASHMORE BOURNEMOUTH MENAI BRIDGE DARLINGTON ABBOTS BROMLEY ELLAND BUTTERSHAW BURTON UPON TRENT IPSWICH BARROW-IN-FURNESS CUDDESDON OTLEY THAME DUNDEE BEDFORD HINDLEY STRETTON GREAT WALTHAM SOUTH SHIELDS BLOXWICH KERESLEY TAYPORT BOTTISHAM CAWSTON TONBRIDGE STANDON ROUGHAM DURSLEY WORDLEY KINGS LYNN MONTROSE HALTWHISTLE WALSALL WOOD SKIPTON CHESTERTON CHELMSFORD MARKET HARBOROUGH ELLESMERE DUNMOW HORNCASTLE KIRBYMOORSIDE OXFORD DARLEY STOCKTON-ON-TEES BLAXTON BRIERLEY HILL DOVER BARNSLEY STANHOPE CHIPPING SODBURY POULTON LE FYLDE GOITSIDE IPSWICH TIBBERTON TELFORD ADLINGTON ABERDARE ODSAL HEREFORD GREAT YARMOUTH GLOSSOP GATEACRE LEIGHTON BUZZARD BURROUGH GREEN SWINTON STALYBRIDGE BUCKHAVEN YEOVIL LEEDS HUDDERSFIELD NEW ELGIN HOLYHEADEnvironmental, WELLINGBOROUGH Social LISKEARD KELVINBRIDGE BURFORD YORK BANFF NEWTOWN BIRKENHEAD CARDIFF INVERKEITHING SUTTON WIGSTON FELSTED COLCHESTER LUTTERWORTH NEWPORT PAGNELL BARNSLEY INGOLDMELLS CREWE STOWMARKET MATLOCKand Governance CLYDEBANK KENDAL Report LANARK 2019 SHAW DUKINFIELD ABERTILLERY DUNFERMLINE ROTHERHAM BLACKPOOL COALVILLE SALTNEY CAMBORNE SOMERCOTES READING UDDINGSTON SMALL HEATH OWSTON FERRY EPPERSTONE PORTSMOUTH GREAT HORTON ST GERMANS RISBY IRVINE KEITH NETHERTON FAKENHAM ELY ROYSTON LITTLEHAMPTON REEPHAM STADHAMPTON GANSTEAD BEIGHTON BRIDGE OF EARN WATH UPON DEARNE ALEXANDRIA TORQUAY HATHERN DRINGHOUSES GREAT LEIGHS
    [Show full text]
  • WDH Annual Report 2020
    Annual Report 2020 delivering promises, improving lives W0168_230720 [Back to contents] Welcome Proud of our achievements Welcome What our tenants think? This year marks my first full year as Chief Executive Meeting standards - locally and nationally at WDH. Home standard The year presented many challenges, not least the global pandemic which started impacting on our Neighbourhood and community standard services in early March. However, the success we have achieved throughout the year has been fantastic. Promoting the health and wellbeing of our tenants Teams across the organisation have worked together to achieve great things and have excelled. Complaints performance The year began with us opening the doors to residents Tenant priorities - You said, we did at Musgrave Court Independent Living Scheme in Wakefield following improvements to the scheme. Value for money and rent standards Since beginning our independent living scheme Andy Wallhead improvement programme, we have invested £57 million Chief Executive Tenancy standard in excellent quality accommodation to enable our more vulnerable tenants to live safely and securely at home About our tenants for longer. This is something we are very proud of. In the spirit of partnership and collaboration, I also got my first opportunity to speak with many of our key Tenant Involvement and Empowerment Standard We achieved some fantastic accolades with our teams stakeholders as we invited them to join us to help build recognised at the CIH Northern Awards where they our five year Business Strategy. This was an eventful Governance and financial viability standard took home the Housing Team of the Year Award; we day and one which gave me a great insight into what successfully retained our G1/V1 status, the highest matters most to our partners and the people we do Corporate responsibility standard available, following the Regulator’s annual business with.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Annual Report and Accounts
    DUMFRIES NEWBURGH WANTAGE BRISTOL KIRKDALE TEWKESBURY NECHELLS THETFORD FARNHAM DONCASTER ROCHFORD ALSTON CLOWNE EVESHAM GLEMSFORD SUDBURY SOUTHSEA LOCHGILPHEAD WIRRAL ASHMORE BOURNEMOUTH MENAI BRIDGE DARLINGTON ABBOTS BROMLEY ELLAND BUTTERSHAW BURTON UPON TRENT IPSWICH BARROW-IN-FURNESS CUDDESDON OTLEY THAME DUNDEE BEDFORD HINDLEY STRETTON GREAT WALTHAM SOUTH SHIELDS BLOXWICH KERESLEY TAYPORT BOTTISHAM CAWSTON TONBRIDGE STANDON ROUGHAM DURSLEY WORDLEY KINGS LYNN MONTROSE HALTWHISTLE WALSALL WOOD SKIPTON CHESTERTON CHELMSFORD MARKET HARBOROUGH ELLESMERE DUNMOW HORNCASTLE KIRBYMOORSIDE OXFORD DARLEY STOCKTON-ON-TEES BLAXTON BRIERLEY HILL DOVER BARNSLEY STANHOPE CHIPPING SODBURY POULTON LE FYLDE GOITSIDE IPSWICH TIBBERTON TELFORD ADLINGTON ABERDARE ODSAL HEREFORD GREAT YARMOUTH GLOSSOP GATEACRE LEIGHTON BUZZARD BURROUGH GREEN SWINTON STALYBRIDGE BUCKHAVEN YEOVIL LEEDS HUDDERSFIELD NEW ELGIN HOLYHEADAnnual WELLINGBOROUGHReport and Accounts LISKEARD 2019 KELVINBRIDGE BURFORD YORK BANFF NEWTOWN BIRKENHEAD CARDIFF INVERKEITHING SUTTON WIGSTON FELSTED COLCHESTER LUTTERWORTH NEWPORT PAGNELL BARNSLEY INGOLDMELLS CREWE STOWMARKET MATLOCK CLYDEBANK KENDAL LANARK SHAW DUKINFIELD ABERTILLERY DUNFERMLINE ROTHERHAM BLACKPOOL COALVILLE SALTNEY CAMBORNE SOMERCOTES READING UDDINGSTON SMALL HEATH OWSTON FERRY EPPERSTONE PORTSMOUTH GREAT HORTON ST GERMANS RISBY IRVINE KEITH NETHERTON FAKENHAM ELY ROYSTON LITTLEHAMPTON REEPHAM STADHAMPTON GANSTEAD BEIGHTON BRIDGE OF EARN WATH UPON DEARNE ALEXANDRIA TORQUAY HATHERN DRINGHOUSES GREAT LEIGHS WALKINGTON NORTH
    [Show full text]
  • Ridings Shopping Centre Wakefield, Wf1 1Ds
    RIDINGS SHOPPING CENTRE WAKEFIELD, WF1 1DS COMMERCIAL PREMISES AVAILABLE RIDINGS SHOPPING CENTRE WAKEFIELD, WF1 1DS 2.7m people living within a 24 hour 20 mile radius multi-storey car park 236,500 318,900 footfall per week total sq ft Bus dominant mode 12.3m of transport footfall p.a. 327,600 1,050 110 wakefield district parking spaces units population Source: CACI’s Retail Footprint, 2017 Off-Peak NewRiver Exit Surveys M1 A653 M62 A654 A656 A6029 A650 M62 (J29) A6032 A655 A653 A6539 RIDINGS SHOPPING CENTRE WAKEFIELD, WF1 1DS A642 EDINBURGH TOWN CENTRE STATISTICS GLASGOW NEWCASTLE BELFAST LEEDS 2,326,388 £241.7m p.a. £5,074 p.a. MANCHESTER M1 total retail catchment comparison goods spend average household comparison goods spend LIVERPOOL 20 mins train–time 10 mins walk 45-54 CARDIFF BRISTOL LONDON to Leeds to Wakefield Train Station typical age profile (highest spend) BRIGHTON MORLEY M1 A653 A650 Birstall M62 A654 A656 Wakefield College A61 A6029 Tingley A650 M62 (J29) A6032 Trinity Walk et CASTLEFORD Balne Stre Lofthouse Gate Batley A655 Wakefield Cathedral A653 Stanley Wakefield Westgate Station A61 A6539 A642 Normanton M1 A650 Ridings Shopping Centre DEWSBURY The Art House Wakefield Westgate Station Ridings Shopping Centre Ossett WAKEFIELD Wakefield Kirkgate Station FEATHERSTONE Wakefield Theatre treet A61 A642 George S A638 Halfords A6186 A642 Wakefield Kirkgate Station Drivetimes 5 minute catchment The Hepworth Wakefield Kinsley34,234 A636 M1 10 minute catchment A636 108,022Hemsworth Source: CACI’s Retail Footprint, 2017 Off-Peak NewRiver
    [Show full text]
  • Design Principles and Constraints
    Wakefield East Consortium City Fields Representations to the Wakefield Retail & Town Centre Local Plan 31 July 2013 Contents 1. Introduction and Background ....................................................................5 2. Statutory Policy Context and Other Relevant Policies .......................7 2.1. Statutory Development Plan.......................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 2.2. National Planning Policy Framework ......................................................................................................................................................................... 9 3. Existing Foodstore Provision in the Wakefield Urban Area ........... 10 4. Responses to Specific Questions within the Wakefield Retail & Town Centre Local Plan Early Engagement Consultation .............. 12 4.1. Question 1............................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 12 4.2. Question 2............................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 12 4.3. Question 3...........................................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]