1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 1 LOEB & LOEB LLP KAREN R. THORLAND (State Bar No. 172092) 2 W. ALLAN EDMISTON (State Bar No. 228246) 10100 Santa Monica Boulevard, Suite 2200 3 Los Angeles, California 90067-4164 Telephone: 310.282.2000 Facsimile: 310.282.2200 4 E-Mail: [email protected] E-Mail: [email protected] 5 JENNER & BLOCK LLP 6 KATHERINE A. FALLOW DUANE C. POZZA (State Bar No. 225933) 7 601 Thirteenth Street, N.W. Suite 1200 South 8 Washington, D.C. 20005 Telephone: 202.639.6000 Facsimile: 202.639.6066 9 E-Mail: [email protected] E-Mail: [email protected] 10 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 COLUMBIA PICTURES ) Case No. 14 ) INDUSTRIES, INC., DISNEY ) COMPLAINT FOR COPYRIGHT 15 ENTERPRISES, INC., PARAMOUNT ) INFRINGEMENT PICTURES CORPORATION, ) 16 ) TRISTAR PICTURES, INC., ) 17 TWENTIETH CENTURY FOX FILM ) CORPORATION, UNIVERSAL CITY ) 18 ) STUDIOS LLLP, UNIVERSAL CITY ) 19 STUDIOS PRODUCTIONS LLLP, and ) WARNER BROS. ENTERTAINMENT ) 20 ) INC., Delaware corporations, ) 21 ) Plaintiffs, ) 22 ) vs. ) 23 ) JUSTIN BUNNELL, FORREST ) 24 ) PARKER, WES PARKER, individuals, ) 25 VALENCE MEDIA, LLC, a ) corporation, and DOES 1-10, ) 26 ) ) 27 Defendants. ) 28 Loeb & Loeb A Limited Liability Partnership Including Professional Corporations Error! Unknown document property name. 1 Plaintiffs Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc. (“Columbia”), Disney 2 Enterprises, Inc. (“Disney”), Paramount Pictures Corporation (“Paramount”), 3 TriStar Pictures, Inc. (“TriStar”), Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation (“Fox”), 4 Universal City Studios LLLP (“Universal”), Universal City Studios Productions 5 LLLP (“Universal Productions”), and Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. (“Warner 6 Bros.”) hereby allege as follows: 7 Jurisdiction And Venue 8 1. This is a civil action seeking damages and injunctive relief for 9 copyright infringement under the copyright laws of the United States, and therefore 10 the Court has jurisdiction under 17 U.S.C. § 101 et seq.; 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (federal 11 question jurisdiction); and 28 U.S.C. § 1338(a) (jurisdiction over copyright actions). 12 2. Personal jurisdiction over the Defendants is proper. On information 13 and belief, each of the Defendants resides, may be found, has a principal place of 14 business, and/or does business in California. Further, on information and belief, 15 each Defendant conducts business with other Defendants and/or unnamed entities in 16 order to operate their website as part of a business venture that is centered in 17 California. Additionally, Defendants have chosen to direct their infringing activities 18 towards California in particular. Defendants enable users, including California 19 residents, to access torrent files on their website, and the users’ computers interact 20 with the website to download infringing copies of Plaintiffs’ works. In fact, the 21 voluminous acts of direct infringement for which Defendants are liable require a 22 high level of interaction between users’ computers and Defendants’ website. On 23 information and belief, many of these acts of direct infringement for which 24 Defendants are liable occur in California, where California residents access 25 Defendants’ website in order to download infringing copies of Plaintiffs’ works. In 26 these and other ways, Defendants have had continuous contact with the State of 27 California and its residents. 28 Loeb & Loeb A Limited Liability Partnership Including Professional Corporations Error! Unknown document property name. 2 1 3. Venue in this District is proper under 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b) and/or 28 2 U.S.C. § 1400(a). On information and belief, each Defendant may be found in this 3 District, and/or a substantial part of the acts of infringement complained of herein 4 occurs or has occurred in this District. 5 Nature Of The Case 6 4. This is a case of willful and rampant infringement of copyright over the 7 Internet. Defendants knowingly enable, encourage, induce and profit from massive 8 online piracy – piracy Defendants could stop, but refuse to. 9 5. Defendants operate a website as part of an online computer network 10 known as “BitTorrent.” Defendants do so to enable their users to locate and 11 download infringing copies of Plaintiffs’ valuable copyrighted motion pictures and 12 television shows for free and without authorization. Defendants operate their 13 website with the express object of promoting its use to infringe Plaintiffs’ 14 copyrights. 15 6. Defendants’ users simultaneously distribute infringing copies of those 16 same works to countless others around the world. As a direct result of Defendants’ 17 conduct, thousands of the most popular motion pictures and television shows – from 18 new releases that are still in theaters to blockbuster DVD releases to today’s most 19 popular television shows – are infringed every day. Absent Defendants’ active and 20 ongoing participation in the daily acts of infringement, this widespread unauthorized 21 copying and distribution of Plaintiffs’ valuable property simply could not happen on 22 the scale that it does. The harm to Plaintiffs, who invest millions of dollars and 23 enormous creative energies to produce their creative copyrighted works, is manifest 24 and irreparable. 25 Copyright Infringement and the BitTorrent Network 26 7. BitTorrent is a peer-to-peer network optimized for the copying and 27 distribution of large files. On a “peer-to-peer” network, the actual exchange of the 28 Loeb & Loeb A Limited Liability Partnership Including Professional Corporations Error! Unknown document property name. 3 1 files – i.e., the actual downloading and uploading – takes place directly between 2 users (or “peers”) of the network. Whether BitTorrent is used for legitimate 3 purposes or copyright infringement is determined by those who operate its websites 4 and its servers. In this case, the Defendants operate a BitTorrent website with the 5 object of enabling and fostering the illegal reproduction and distribution of copies of 6 Plaintiffs’ movies and television programs protected by copyright. 7 8. Defendants set up, maintain, and operate a website that, by design, 8 fosters widescale copyright infringement by users on the BitTorrent network. 9 Simply put, the Defendants’ website exists to entice and facilitate copyright 10 infringement, and materially contribute to such infringement – enabling Internet 11 users to quickly copy and transfer files, almost all of them infringing, many of them 12 Plaintiffs’ copyrighted movies and television programs. Defendants do so to profit 13 unlawfully from the distribution of Plaintiffs’ copyrighted movies and television 14 programs. 15 9. Downloading files using the BitTorrent network is straightforward. 16 Users access the defendants’ website that lists files – in this case movies and 17 television programs – that are available for download. By clicking on the file name, 18 an illegal copy of the movie or television program is automatically copied to a user’s 19 computer. That newly copied movie or television program is a perfect digital copy 20 – ready to be viewed, burned to a portable media like a DVD, and/or copied by and 21 distributed to another user. 22 10. The BitTorrent network is made up of three principal components: (a) a 23 BitTorrent “client” application, (b) indexing websites known as “torrent sites” and 24 (c) computer servers known as BitTorrent “trackers.” Each is necessary for the 25 operation of the network. 26 11. The BitTorrent network works as follows: users download a small 27 program that they install on their computers – the BitTorrent “client” application. 28 Loeb & Loeb A Limited Liability Partnership Including Professional Corporations Error! Unknown document property name. 4 1 The BitTorrent client is the users’ interface during the downloading process. There 2 are many different versions of BitTorrent clients, all of which are readily available 3 on the Internet for free. BitTorrent client applications do not have the ability to 4 search for files. To find files available for download, users must visit torrent sites 5 using any standard Internet browser. 6 12. A torrent site is a website that contains an index of files available on 7 the network (generally an extensive listing of movies and television programs, 8 among other copyrighted content). The torrent site hosts and distributes small files 9 known as “torrents.” Although torrents do not contain actual copies of the movie or 10 television program, they automatically and invisibly instruct a user’s computer 11 where to go and how to get the desired file. Torrents interact with specific trackers, 12 allowing the user to download the desired file. 13 13. A BitTorrent tracker manages the distribution of files, connecting 14 uploaders (those who are distributing a movie) with downloaders (those who are 15 copying a movie). A tracker functions in many respects like a “traffic cop,” 16 directing a BitTorrent user’s computer where to find users who have a particular 17 file, and then providing the user’s computer with access to those other users to 18 facilitate the download process. When a BitTorrent user seeks to download a movie 19 or television file, he or she merely clicks on a torrent file on a torrent site, and the 20 torrent file instructs the client software how to connect to a tracker that will identify 21 where the file is available in cyberspace. 22 14. Torrent sites play an integral role in the process of using BitTorrent to 23 download files. Without them, users could not identify, locate or download 24 infringing files. Indeed, the content available on the BitTorrent network is defined 25 entirely by what files the operators of torrent sites – such as Defendants – choose to 26 allow to be indexed and distributed. Defendants’ sites enable, cause, materially 27 28 Loeb & Loeb A Limited Liability Partnership Including Professional Corporations Error! Unknown document property name. 5 1 contribute to, foster and induct widespread copyright infringement of Plaintiffs’ 2 works. 3 The Parties 4 The Plaintiffs 5 15. Plaintiffs Columbia, Disney, Paramount, TriStar, Fox, Universal, 6 Universal Productions, and Warner Bros.
Recommended publications
  • Šta Znače Oznake CAM, WP, TS, SCR, TC, R5, DVDRIP, HDTV?
    Šta znače oznake CAM, WP, TS, SCR, TC, R5, DVDRIP, HDTV? Ako vas zanima šta tačno označavaju skraćenice za kvalitet filmskog snimka: CAM, WP, TS, SCR, TC, R5, DVDRIP, HDTV, itd., pročitajte ovaj članak. Slijedi tabela kvaliteta filmskih snimaka, koja govori sa kog fizickog medija (kino snimak kamerom, original vhs kaseta, original dvd, itd) je film kopiran, u smjeru od najlošijeg kvaliteta ka najboljem. Tip Oznaka Rasprostranjenost Dosta čest format, mada se sve ređe Cam "CAM" pojavljuje, zbog postojanja DVD rip formata koji je daleko kvalitetniji Snimak filma napravljen kamerom u kinu, a zvuk je dobijen pomoću mikrofona na kameri, tako da se često vide i čuju i gledaoci u bioskopu. Ovaj kvalitet snimka se obično pojavi odmah nakon prve premijere filma u kinima Kvalitet video i audio zapisa je najčešće veoma loš. "WP" Workprint Vrlo rijedak "WORKPRINT" Kopija napravljena od nedovršene verzije filma. Uglavnom fale mnogi efekti i film može da se skroz razlikuje od konačne verzije filma. "TS" Telesync Vrlo čest "TELESYNC" Nasuprot popularnom vjerovanju, kvalitet kod TS video snimka ne mora da bude bolji od kvaliteta CAM snimka. Naziv Telesync ne označava bolji kvalitet VIDEO zapisa, nego bolji kvalitet AUDIO zapisa. Uglavnom je video snimak isti kao i CAM, a audio snimak bolji. Zbog toga se CAM veoma često brka sa TS. R5 "R5" Vrlo čest R5 Line je DVD verzija za region 5. Region 5 čine Istočna Evropa, (bivši SSSR), Indija, Afrika, Severna Koreja i Mongolija. Kvalitet R5 snimka se razlikuje od kvaliteta normalnog DVD-a po tome što je video snimak odličnog kvaliteta (kopiran sa DVD-a), a audio snimak je lošeg kvaliteta (kopiran sa Telecyne snimka, da bi se dobio zvuk originala, pošto je R5 DVD verzija obično prilagođena/sinhronizovana na jezik nekog od tih 5 regiona).
    [Show full text]
  • Piracy Landscape Study
    Piracy Landscape Study: Analysis of Existing and Emerging Research Relevant to Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) Enforcement of Commercial-Scale Piracy Prepared for the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Solicitation Number: 1333BJ19Q00142004 Brett Danaher Michael D. Smith Rahul Telang Chapman University Carnegie Mellon University Carnegie Mellon University This Version: March 20, 2020 Table of Contents Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................... 3 1. The Piracy Ecosystem........................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Piracy of Physical Goods................................................................................................ 6 1.1.1 Manufacturing......................................................................................................... 7 1.1.2 Discovery ................................................................................................................ 7 1.1.3 Distribution ............................................................................................................. 8 1.1.4 Communication, Payment Processing and Fulfillment ......................................... 11 1.2 Piracy of Digital Goods ................................................................................................ 11 1.2.1 Sources.................................................................................................................. 12 1.2.2
    [Show full text]
  • Movie Tags & Meaning of It
    Movie Tags & meaning of it Original Sources CAM - A cam is a theater rip usually done with a digital video camera. A mini tripod is sometimes used, but a lot of the time this wont be possible, so the camera make shake. Also seating placement isn't always idle, and it might be filmed from an angle. If cropped properly, this is hard to tell unless there's text on the screen, but a lot of times these are left with triangular borders on the top and bottom of the screen. Sound is taken from the onboard microphone of the camera, and especially in comedies, laughter can often be heard during the film. Due to these factors picture and sound quality are usually quite poor, but sometimes we're lucky, and the theater will be fairly empty and a fairly clear signal will be heard. TELESYNC (TS) - A telesync is the same spec as a CAM except it uses an external audio source (most likely an audio jack in the chair for hard of hearing people). A direct audio source does not ensure a good quality audio source, as a lot of background noise can interfere. A lot of the times a telesync is filmed in an empty cinema or from the projection booth with a professional camera, giving a better picture quality. Quality ranges drastically, check the sample before downloading the full release. A high percentage of Telesyncs are CAMs that have been mislabeled. TELECINE (TC) - A telecine machine copies the film digitally from the reels. Sound and picture should be very good, but due to the equipment involved and cost telecines are fairly uncommon.
    [Show full text]
  • Scene Releases | for Your Daily Scene and P2P Releases Page 1
    Scene Releases | For your daily Scene and P2P releases Page 1 Scene Releases For your daily Scene and P2P releases Home Forum About Affiliates Apply for Editor Disclaimer DMCA FAQ SGL xXx Website Rules IRC Links Contact Subscribe to Rss Feed WikiRebels - The Documentary The Tourist 2010 Cam XviD – iLLUSiON (Kingdom-Release) AnthraX (1252)December 18th, 2010 | 1:11 pm or 13:11 GMTMovies, Movies - Cam Release Info Release Group: iLLUSiON (Kingdom-Release) ( P2P ) Release Name: The Tourist 2010 Cam XviD – iLLUSiON (Kingdom-Release) Release Date: 18th Dec , 2010 Filename: The Tourist 2010 Cam XviD – iLLUSiON (Kingdom-Release).avi Source: CAM Size: 697.029 MB (730,888,226 bytes) Genre: Action | Drama | Thriller Video: 704 x 302 | 873 Kbps Audio: English | 128 Kbps | 2 ch | Mp3 Subtitles: None Runtime: 1h 35mn IMDB Rating: 6.0/10 RT Critics: 4.3/10 ( 136 reviews) Directed By: Florian Henckel von Donnersmarck Starring: Johnny Depp, Angelina Jolie and Paul Bettany Release Description Revolves around Frank, an American tourist visiting Italy to mend a broken heart. Elise is an extraordinary woman who deliberately crosses his path. Release Quality Associated Links Homepage - Trailer - IMDB - RT - NFO - Search (TPB, Torrent, NZB) Download Links http://scenereleases.info/ 18-12-2010 12:50:02 Scene Releases | For your daily Scene and P2P releases Page 2 Download Single Link ( Hotfile ) ( Fileserve ) ( Duckload ) Online Streaming – Sample 12 Comments Call of Duty Black Ops Update 4 Read Nfo-SKIDROW RuSH (288)December 18th, 2010 | 12:06 pm or 12:06 GMTGames Release Info Release Group: SKIDROW Release Name: Call.of.Duty.Black.Ops.Update.4.Read.Nfo-SKIDROW Release Date: 18th Dec , 2010 Filename: Call.of.Duty.Black.Ops.Update.4.exe Size: 71 MB Genre: First-Person Shooter Published by: Activision Developed by: Treyarch Online Play: 18 Versus/ 4 Co-op Release Description Hear the call of duty once again with this seventh entry in this blockbuster first-person shooter franchise.
    [Show full text]
  • Pirates of the Oscars: Trends in Piracy Among Oscar Nominated Films Rachel Chiu, Yanli Gao, James Rigby
    Pirates of the Oscars: Trends in Piracy Among Oscar Nominated Films Rachel Chiu, Yanli Gao, James Rigby Introduction Relationship Between First Leak and Box Office Temporal Trends Gross With the 83rd annual Academy Awards just around the corner, we sought to • Not surprisingly, the movies that make more money at the box office • Prior to 2008, all nominated study the piracy trends in movies that have received Oscar nominations in (presumably the more popular ones) tend to be leaked faster than those movies had their retail DVD’s the years since 2003. With slightly over thirty films nominated each year, our that don’t do as well, which is likely due to the higher public demand leaked before Oscar Night for data set gave us 245 movies. The following are the types of leaks we associated with these films. several years in a row. studied: • Despite this trend, the movies that are leaked before they even reach • 2007 seems to have been the • R5: Low quality screener theaters tend to be the ones that don’t make as much money when they peak in number of leaks per • Cam: Video camera in movie theater are released (maybe because people have already seen them?). year, of all types, and since • Telesync (TS): Same as Cam recording but sound is directly connected to then there has been a steady source downward trend of that ratio. • Screener: Pre DVD sent to critics and other professionals prior to release • Steady decline in ratio of leaks • Retail DVD: Final product may be effective intervention Data on the part of the government or perhaps the film studios.
    [Show full text]
  • The Growing Threat of Internet Piracy in the Movie Industry: the Effect of Rapid Pirated Leaks on Motion Picture Revenues
    The Growing Threat of Internet Piracy in the Movie Industry: The Effect of Rapid Pirated Leaks on Motion Picture Revenues An Honors Thesis for the Department of Economics Nicholas Henning Tufts University, 2009 Abstract In 2005, the MPAA claimed that worldwide losses to movie piracy amounted to about $18.2 billion, with $6.1 billion of that missing revenue accounted for by MPAA affiliates alone. The difficulty in measuring piracy is that it is obviously illegal, making data collection and participant surveys skewed in results. In addition, the movie industry is a complex system, and any given movie has a large variability of success factors which amount to unpredictability in the expected revenue of motion pictures. This paper seeks to investigate how the speed of internet piracy affects industry revenues by creating a model for film revenue regressed against the number of days from theatrical release to first piracy leak, first screener leak, and first DVD leak, amongst several control variables. When including control variables, the impact of piracy is found to be negligible, particularly in comparison to the production budget variable. Without these controls, significance is found for days until first piracy leak and screener leak, implying the more days until first piracy leak the lower revenues will be and that more days until first screener leak leads to higher revenues, t(124)=-2.91, p<.01, and t(124)=3.05, p<.01. Finally, scatter plots of the data find that most films which end up making high worldwide revenues are pirated within the first week after theatrical release.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategies for Reducing Digital Piracy
    THE INFORMAtiON TECHNOLOGY & INNOVAtiON FOUNDAtiON Steal These Policies: Strategies for Reducing Digital Piracy BY DANIEL CASTRO, RICHARD BENNETT AND SCOTT ANDES | DECEMBER 2009 We need to open a broad Executive Summary dialogue that engages all stakeholders, including he rise of broadband Internet access and cheap storage, along government, content with the growth of digital content, has enabled digital pi- owners, website racy to flourish around the world. Piracy enables the unau- operators, technolog y T thorized distribution of music, movies, television programs, software, developers, and ISPs video games, books, photos, and periodicals quickly and easily, to the and other intermediaries, on how to improve the detriment of creative artists and legitimate rights holders. These prac- global response to piracy. tices threaten not only the robust production of digital content in the future, but U.S. jobs in the present. Unfortunately, many advocates, believing that information should be free, would have government not only turn a blind eye to digital piracy, but actively tie the hands of companies who seek to limit digital piracy. This report makes the case that digital piracy is a serious problem with significant ramifica- tions for the U.S. economy, that a number of approaches, including technical solutions such as content identification, are needed to reduce piracy, and that governments should support legitimate industry ef- forts to reduce digital piracy, including those that focus on the revenue streams of those engaging in piracy. There is no “silver bullet” that will solve controls such as locks, closed-circuit the piracy problem—no single technical TV, and anti-theft packaging as well or legislative proposal will completely as a government-funded system of law solve such a complex issue—but there enforcement, digital piracy requires a are many “lead bullets” that can help coordinated approach.
    [Show full text]
  • The Internet Guide for the Movie Addict
    The Internet Guide for the Movie Addict Saikat Basu The Things I Do This manual is intellectual property of MakeUseOf. It must only be published in its original form. Using parts or republishing altered parts of this guide is prohibited. The Internet Guide for the Movie Addict This page intentionally left blank 2 The Things I Do The Internet Guide for the Movie Addict Table of Contents 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 5 2. Getting your fix on the internet .......................................................................................................... 6 2.1 Online meeting places for the moviegoer ................................................................................... 6 2.2 Search for movie reviews and views ............................................................................................ 9 2.3 Get a sneak preview with trailers .............................................................................................. 13 2.4 What’s playing near you? ........................................................................................................... 17 3. Set Up Your Own Entertainment ....................................................................................................... 19 3.1 Watching Stuff Online ................................................................................................................ 19 3.2 Watching it with a Download ....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 4D 135301' IR 004 736 AUTHOR Gunter, Jonahan TITLE Snpei 8: the Madest Medium
    .bocommiT 'moss 4D 135301' IR 004 736 AUTHOR Gunter, Jonahan TITLE Snpei 8: The Madest Medium.. ., INSTITUTION United,Fations.Educational.Scientific, and Cultural Organization, Paris (Prance).' PUIL DATE 76 *4 , . AtoTt 88p-.;'Notavailable in hard.topy due to copyright restrictions . , EDRS PRICE ,MT-$0.83 Plus Posta* gc Not Available from EDRS. 'DESCRIPTORS Developing Nations; Editing; *Eigtt Millimeter projeCtors; *Tilos; Filmstrips; ptotographic- Equipment; production TeCtniques; *Projection Equipment; Sixteen Millimeter PrOjectori; *Sound Films; *State of the Art Reviews; Video Equipment IDENTIFIERS -Super 8 Films ABSTRACT This state of the art review gives an overview of the tistorf of the development of.Super 8 film, and describes a. range Of . hardware.'associated'with'it, covering.such areas as camera, sound synchrOnrzation, double_system recording., lighting, film processing, sound transfer, editing, sound mixing, display, and methods of distribution. It examines the potential use of 8 iillimeter for television broadcasi, an& examines super 8:in relation to other media ,snch a.s'16 milfimeter,film and videotape. It concludes that Super.8 is basically a prodaction medium that.is economical, versatile,, and easy to operate. It is likely that itwfil-have its greatest impact in the Third World. (NBC) . ********************* ************************************************** * Documents abquired by ERIC include many informal unpublished- * * materials not available from other sources. ERIC mak*s every effort * * to obtain-the best copy available. Nevertheless, items'of marginal * * reproducibility, aEe often,encountered and this affects the quality *. * of tile microfichelend hardcopy reproductions ERIC makes available * * via the ERIC Document Reproduction Service (EDR8)..EDRS is nbt *. * responsible for the. quality of the original document. Reproductions *' * supplied by EDRS are.tte best that can be made from the original.
    [Show full text]
  • United States District~Cql!Rt T
    • United States Dis trict~C Ql!rt t ___------'C""E""NC!.T""'RA.,....L""- ___ DISTRICT OF ___--' C""A'-'.L""I""'F.."O'-'RN"'-'-'I"-'A'--_ In the Matter of the Seizure of (Addru l or Dri t! dutriplion or property or prfrniscs 10 be leized) THE FOLLOWING DOMAIN NAMES: APPLICATION AND AFFIDAVIT FOR SEIZURE WARRANT RAPGODFATHERS.COM, TORRENT-FINDER. COM, RMX4U.COM, CASE NUMBEi DAJAZ1.COM, and 0 - 28 22M ONSMASH.COM I, ANDREW REYNOLDS, being duly sworn depose and say: I am a Special Agent with the Homeland Security Investigations, Immigration and Customs Enforcement and have reason to believe that in the CENTRAL District of CALIFORNIA there is now concealed a certain person or property, namely the following Internet domain names: (ducribcthc pcnon or proputyto buciud) RAPGODFATHERS.COM, registered with Enom, Inc" which has its headquarters at 15801 NE 24" Street, Bellevue, Washington 98008; TORRENT-FINDER.COM registered with Blue Razor Domains, Inc., which has its headquarters at 14455 North Hayden Road, Suite 226, Scottsdale, Arizona 85260j RMX4U.COM registered with Enam, Inc. which has its headquarters at 15801 NE 24th Street, Bellevue, Washington 98008j DAJAZ1.COM registered with Fast Domain, Inc., which has its headquarters at 1958 South 950 East, Provo, Utah 84606; and ONSMASH.COM registered with Godaddy.com, Inc., which has its headquarters at 14455 N. Hayden Road, Suite 219, Scottsdale, Arizona 85260. which is (nace one Of more basu (or nR.ure undtr Uni ted Statu Code) subject to seizure and civil forfeiture under IS U.S.C. §§ 2323(a)(I)(B) and § 9SI(b); concerning a violation of Title 17, United States Code, Section 506(a) and T itle 18, United States Code, Section 2319.
    [Show full text]
  • Pre-Release Piracy: Studio's Response
    No Meaningful Impact? Outline The Effect of Pre-Release Movie Piracy on Box-Office Sales • Understanding Movie Piracy • Piracy: In dus try an d Aca dem ic P erspec tives • Promotional potential for piracy? Liyy,e Ma, Param Vir Sing g,h, Michael D Smith , and Alan Montg gyomery Carnegie Mellon University • CliConclusions e-mail: [email protected] web: http: //www.an drew.cmu.e du /user /a lm 3 Hong Kong; 5 July 2010 (7 -8pm) University of Hong Kong Expert Address Room 613 , United Centre , Admiralty , HK 1 2 Pre-Release Piracy: Studio’s Response • Pirated copies of Lions Gate Entertainment Corp’s horror sequel “Hostel: Part II” The Problem of Movie Piracy appeared a month before theatrical release on 8 June 2008 • In response, Lion Gate’s PresidObdent Tom Ortenberg said “It’s distressing and disappointing, but it will have no meaningful impact on the box office.” 3 4 The Problem Pre-Release Piracy: Director’s Response “However, piracy has become worse than ever now, and a stolen workprint (with unfinished music, no sound effects , and no VFX) leaked out on line before the release, and is really hurting us, especially internationally. Piracy will be the death of the film industry, as it killed the music industry, and while it makes a smaller dent in huge movies like Spider-man 3, it really hurts films like mine, which have far less of an advertising and production budget. Not only that, critics have actually been REVIEWING the film based off the pirated copy, which is inexcusable. Some of these critics I have actually known for a few
    [Show full text]