DOCSLIB.ORG

"Sexually Violent Predator" Commitment Deirdre M

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
University of Maine School of Law University of Maine School of Law Digital Commons Faculty Publications Faculty Scholarship Summer 2015 Dangerous Diagnoses, Risky Assumptions, and the Failed Experiment of "Sexually Violent Predator" Commitment Deirdre M. Smith University of Maine School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.mainelaw.maine.edu/faculty- publications Part of the Civil Law Commons, Civil Procedure Commons, Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, Criminal Law Commons, Evidence Commons, Health Law and Policy Commons, Human Rights Law Commons, Law and Philosophy Commons, Law and Politics Commons, Law and Psychology Commons, Law and Society Commons, Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility Commons, and the Medical Jurisprudence Commons Suggested Bluebook Citation Deirdre M. Smith, Dangerous Diagnoses, Risky Assumptions, and the Failed Experiment of "Sexually Violent Predator" Commitment, 67 OKLA. L. Rev. 619 (2015). Available at: http://digitalcommons.mainelaw.maine.edu/faculty-publications/67 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at University of Maine School of Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of University of Maine School of Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. OKLAHOMA LAW REVIEW VOLUME 67 SUMMER 2015 NUMBER 4 DANGEROUS DIAGNOSES, RISKY ASSUMPTIONS, AND THE FAILED EXPERIMENT OF “SEXUALLY VIOLENT PREDATOR” COMMITMENT DEIRDRE M. SMITH* In its 1997 opinion, Kansas v. Hendricks, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld a law that reflected a new model of civil commitment. The targets of this new commitment law were dubbed “Sexually Violent Predators” (SVPs), and the Court upheld indefinite detention of these individuals on the assumption that there is a psychiatrically distinct class of individuals who, unlike typical recidivists, have a mental condition that impairs their ability to refrain from violent sexual behavior. And, more specifically, the Court assumed that the justice system could reliably identify the true “predators,” those for whom this unusual and extraordinary deprivation of liberty is appropriate and legitimate, with the aid of testimony from mental health professionals. This Article evaluates those assumptions and concludes that, because they were seriously flawed, the due process rationale used to uphold the SVP laws is invalid. The “Sexually Violent Predator” is a political and moral construct, not a medical classification. The implementation of SVP laws has resulted in dangerous distortions of both psychiatric expertise and * Professor of Law and Director of the Cumberland Legal Aid Clinic, University of Maine School of Law. I am grateful to the following people who read earlier drafts of this article and provided many helpful insights: David Cluchey, Malick Ghachem, Barbara Herrnstein Smith, and Jenny Roberts. I also appreciate the comments and reactions of the participants in the University of Maine School of Law Faculty Workshop, February 2014, and the participants in the Association of American Law Schools Section on Clinical Legal Education Works in Progress Session, May 2014. I am appreciative of Dean Peter Pitegoff for providing summer research support and of the staff of the Donald L. Garbrecht Law Library for its research assistance. 619 620 OKLAHOMA LAW REVIEW [Vol. 67:619 important legal principles, and such distortions reveal an urgent need to re- examine the Supreme Court’s core rationale in upholding the SVP commitment experiment. Table of Contents I. Introduction ........................................................................................... 621 II. The Supreme Court Sanctions the “Sexually Violent Predator” Experiment ................................................................................................ 625 A. The Origins of SVP Commitment ................................................... 627 1. Rise and Fall of Sexual Psychopath Laws .................................... 627 2. The New Experiment: Washington’s Model SVP Law ............... 629 B. Legal Challenges to the New SVP Laws ......................................... 636 1. Background of the Hendricks-Crane Litigation ........................... 637 2. The Supreme Court Upholds the SVP Model of Commitment .... 642 3. The Core Assumptions Underlying the Stated Rationales of Hendricks and Crane ........................................................................ 646 C. The Spread of SVP Laws and Their Impact .................................... 651 III. Distortions of Science and Law in SVP Commitment Proceedings ... 659 A. Psychiatry’s View of Diagnosing and Predicting Sexual Violence . 661 1. Role of Diagnosis and the DSM Generally in Psychiatric Assessment ....................................................................................... 661 2. Origins of Lack of Consensus Regarding Relation of Pathology to Sexual Deviance ............................................................................... 664 3. The DSM and Paraphilias ............................................................ 666 4. Research Undermines Presumed Connections Between Mental Disorders and Sex Crimes ................................................................ 672 5. The Absent Connection Between Psychiatric Assessment of Paraphilia and Determination of “Volitional Impairment” .............. 674 6. ASPD as Alternative Basis of Mental Disorder ........................... 677 7. Psychiatry’s Response to SVP Laws and Hendricks-Crane Rationale .......................................................................................... 679 B. Pathologizing Predators in the Courtroom ....................................... 682 1. One Example of the Distortions: McGee v. Bartow ..................... 684 2. Misuse of Diagnostic Labels ........................................................ 688 3. Basing Opinions on Records and Inadmissible Evidence ............ 696 4. Using Actuarial Tools .................................................................. 701 5. Sparse Use of Daubert-Frye Analysis.......................................... 707 C. Fixing the Science to Fit the Courtroom .......................................... 714 1. Addressing Problems with Diagnoses .......................................... 714 2015] DANGEROUS DIAGNOSES, RISKY ASSUMPTIONS 621 2. Using Actuarial Tools as a Check on or to Replace Clinical Judgment .......................................................................................... 718 IV. Revisiting the Hendricks-Crane Rationale ......................................... 722 V. Conclusion ........................................................................................... 730 I. Introduction In 1990, the state of Washington was consumed by news of a highly publicized, violent sexual crime committed against a young child by an offender with prior convictions for violence against children.1 In response to public outcry, the Washington legislature enacted a statute allowing the state to continue to detain certain sex offenders after they had completed their criminal sentences.2 The targets of these new laws were dubbed “Sexually Violent Predators” (SVPs), a label intended to connote a subclass of sex offenders who run a high risk of recidivism after their release due to the presence of a mental abnormality or personality disorder.3 Soon thereafter, a few other states, including Kansas, enacted their own commitment laws modeled closely after Washington’s.4 The first person committed under Kansas’s law, Leroy Hendricks, challenged the constitutionality of his indefinite detention on due process, ex post facto, and double jeopardy grounds in a case that reached the U.S. Supreme Court.5 In its 1997 opinion Kansas v. Hendricks, the Court upheld this new commitment model.6 In the wake of that case, other states (a total of twenty to date) and the federal government enacted SVP laws.7 Since 1990, the 1. See infra notes 58-64 and accompanying text. 2. WASH. REV. CODE ANN. §§ 71.09.010 to .09.903 (West 2014); see infra notes 78-84 and accompanying text. 3. See infra notes 63-79 and accompanying text. 4. See, e.g., KAN. STAT. ANN. §§ 59-29a01 to 29a24 (West 2008); WIS. STAT. §§ 980.01 to .14 (2013). 5. Kansas v. Hendricks, 521 U.S. 346, 350 (1997). 6. Id. at 371. 7. Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006, Pub. L. No. 109-248, 120 Stat. 587 (codified at 42 U.S.C. § 16901 (2012)). ARIZ. REV. STAT. ANN. §§ 36-3701 to - 3717 (2009); CAL. WELF. & INST. CODE §§ 6600-6609.3 (West 2010); D.C. CODE §§ 22-3803 to 3811 (2013); FLA. STAT. ANN. §§ 394.910-.932 (West 2011); 725 ILL. COMP. STAT. ANN. 207/1 to /99 (West 2006); IOWA CODE ANN. §§ 229a.1 to .16 (West 2014); KAN. STAT. ANN. §§ 59-29a01 to -29a24 (West 2008); MASS. GEN. LAWS ch. 123a, §§ 1-16 (West 2003); 2007 MINN. STAT. ANN. § 253d.01 to .36 (West & Supp. 2009); MO. ANN. STAT. §§ 632.480-.513 (West 2014); NEB. REV. STAT. ANN. §§ 71-1201 to -1226 (West 2009); N.H. REV. STAT. ANN. §§ 135-E:1 to :24 (2015); N.J. STAT. ANN. §§ 30:4-27.24 to .38 (West 2008); N.Y. MENTAL HYG. LAW §§ 10.01-.17 (McKinney 2006 & Supp. 2011); N.D. CENT. CODE §§ 25- 03.3-01 to -24 (2014); S.C. CODE ANN. §§ 44-48-10 to -170 (2002 & Supp. 2008); VA. CODE 622 OKLAHOMA LAW REVIEW [Vol. 67:619 federal government and the states have committed several thousand people under SVP laws, the vast majority of whom remain in indefinite detention.8 The
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bdsm) Communities
    BOUND BY CONSENT: CONCEPTS OF CONSENT WITHIN THE LEATHER AND BONDAGE, DOMINATION, SADOMASOCHISM (BDSM) COMMUNITIES A Thesis by Anita Fulkerson Bachelor of General Studies, Wichita State University, 1993 Submitted to the Department of Liberal Studies and the faculty of the Graduate School of Wichita State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts December 2010 © Copyright 2010 by Anita Fulkerson All Rights Reserved Note that thesis work is protected by copyright, with all rights reserved. Only the author has the legal right to publish, produce, sell, or distribute this work. Author permission is needed for others to directly quote significant amounts of information in their own work or to summarize substantial amounts of information in their own work. Limited amounts of information cited, paraphrased, or summarized from the work may be used with proper citation of where to find the original work. BOUND BY CONSENT: CONCEPTS OF CONSENT WITHIN THE LEATHER AND BONDAGE, DOMINATION, SADOMASOCHISM (BDSM) COMMUNITIES The following faculty members have examined the final copy of this thesis for form and content, and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Master of Arts with a major in Liberal Studies _______________________________________ Ron Matson, Committee Chair _______________________________________ Linnea Glen-Maye, Committee Member _______________________________________ Jodie Hertzog, Committee Member _______________________________________ Patricia Phillips, Committee Member iii DEDICATION To my Ma'am, my parents, and my Leather Family iv When you build consent, you build the Community. v ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank my adviser, Ron Matson, for his unwavering belief in this topic and in my ability to do it justice and his unending enthusiasm for the project.
    [Show full text]
  • Sexually Violent Predator” Commitment
    Oklahoma Law Review Volume 67 Number 4 2014 Dangerous Diagnoses, Risky Assumptions, and the Failed Experiment of “Sexually Violent Predator” Commitment Deirdre M. Smith University of Maine School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.ou.edu/olr Part of the Criminal Law Commons, and the Law and Psychology Commons Recommended Citation Deirdre M. Smith, Dangerous Diagnoses, Risky Assumptions, and the Failed Experiment of “Sexually Violent Predator” Commitment, 67 OKLA. L. REV. 619 (2015), https://digitalcommons.law.ou.edu/olr/vol67/iss4/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by University of Oklahoma College of Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Oklahoma Law Review by an authorized editor of University of Oklahoma College of Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Dangerous Diagnoses, Risky Assumptions, and the Failed Experiment of “Sexually Violent Predator” Commitment Cover Page Footnote I am grateful to the following people who read earlier drafts of this article and provided many helpful insights: David Cluchey, Malick Ghachem, Barbara Herrnstein Smith, and Jenny Roberts. I also appreciate the comments and reactions of the participants in the University of Maine School of Law Faculty Workshop, February 2014, and the participants in the Association of American Law Schools Section on Clinical Legal Education Works in Progress Session, May 2014. I am appreciative of Dean Peter Pitegoff for providing summer research support and of the staff of the Donald L. Garbrecht Law Library for its research assistance. This article is available in Oklahoma Law Review: https://digitalcommons.law.ou.edu/olr/vol67/iss4/1 OKLAHOMA LAW REVIEW VOLUME 67 SUMMER 2015 NUMBER 4 DANGEROUS DIAGNOSES, RISKY ASSUMPTIONS, AND THE FAILED EXPERIMENT OF “SEXUALLY VIOLENT PREDATOR” COMMITMENT * DEIRDRE M.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Paraphilias
    List of paraphilias Paraphilias are sexual interests in objects, situations, or individuals that are atypical. The American Psychiatric Association, in its Paraphilia Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, Fifth Edition (DSM), draws a Specialty Psychiatry distinction between paraphilias (which it describes as atypical sexual interests) and paraphilic disorders (which additionally require the experience of distress or impairment in functioning).[1][2] Some paraphilias have more than one term to describe them, and some terms overlap with others. Paraphilias without DSM codes listed come under DSM 302.9, "Paraphilia NOS (Not Otherwise Specified)". In his 2008 book on sexual pathologies, Anil Aggrawal compiled a list of 547 terms describing paraphilic sexual interests. He cautioned, however, that "not all these paraphilias have necessarily been seen in clinical setups. This may not be because they do not exist, but because they are so innocuous they are never brought to the notice of clinicians or dismissed by them. Like allergies, sexual arousal may occur from anything under the sun, including the sun."[3] Most of the following names for paraphilias, constructed in the nineteenth and especially twentieth centuries from Greek and Latin roots (see List of medical roots, suffixes and prefixes), are used in medical contexts only. Contents A · B · C · D · E · F · G · H · I · J · K · L · M · N · O · P · Q · R · S · T · U · V · W · X · Y · Z Paraphilias A Paraphilia Focus of erotic interest Abasiophilia People with impaired mobility[4] Acrotomophilia
    [Show full text]
  • Whipping Girl
    Table of Contents Title Page Dedication Introduction Trans Woman Manifesto PART 1 - Trans/Gender Theory Chapter 1 - Coming to Terms with Transgen- derism and Transsexuality Chapter 2 - Skirt Chasers: Why the Media Depicts the Trans Revolution in ... Trans Woman Archetypes in the Media The Fascination with “Feminization” The Media’s Transgender Gap Feminist Depictions of Trans Women Chapter 3 - Before and After: Class and Body Transformations 3/803 Chapter 4 - Boygasms and Girlgasms: A Frank Discussion About Hormones and ... Chapter 5 - Blind Spots: On Subconscious Sex and Gender Entitlement Chapter 6 - Intrinsic Inclinations: Explaining Gender and Sexual Diversity Reconciling Intrinsic Inclinations with Social Constructs Chapter 7 - Pathological Science: Debunking Sexological and Sociological Models ... Oppositional Sexism and Sex Reassignment Traditional Sexism and Effemimania Critiquing the Critics Moving Beyond Cissexist Models of Transsexuality Chapter 8 - Dismantling Cissexual Privilege Gendering Cissexual Assumption Cissexual Gender Entitlement The Myth of Cissexual Birth Privilege Trans-Facsimilation and Ungendering 4/803 Moving Beyond “Bio Boys” and “Gen- etic Girls” Third-Gendering and Third-Sexing Passing-Centrism Taking One’s Gender for Granted Distinguishing Between Transphobia and Cissexual Privilege Trans-Exclusion Trans-Objectification Trans-Mystification Trans-Interrogation Trans-Erasure Changing Gender Perception, Not Performance Chapter 9 - Ungendering in Art and Academia Capitalizing on Transsexuality and Intersexuality
    [Show full text]
  • Queer in a Haystack: Queering Rural Space Sound Bites of Rural Nova Scotia NMP Rosemary Macadam M-C Macphee & Mél Hogan 28–35 82–87
    www.nomorepotlucks.org CREDITS Editors Mél Hogan - Directrice artistique M-C MacPhee - Content Curator Dayna McLeod - Video Curator Fabien Rose - Éditeur & Traducteur Gabriel Chagnon - Éditeur & Traducteur Mathilde Géromin - Contributrice Lukas Blakk - Web Admin & Editor Regular Contributors Elisha Lim Nicholas Little Copy Editors Tamara Sheperd Jenn Clamen Renuka Chaturvedi Karen Cocq Traduction Gabriel Chagnon Web 2 Jeff Traynor - Drupal development NMP Mél Hogan - Site Design Lukas Blakk - Web Admin Open Source Content Management System Drupal.org Publishing Mél Hogan - Publisher & Designer Momoko Allard - Publishing Assistant Print-on-Demand Lulu.com: http://stores.lulu.com/nomorepotlucks copyright 2010 • all copyrightwith the author/creator/photographer remains http://nomorepotlucks.org subscribe to the online version • abonnement en ligne: TABLE OF CONTENTS Editorial Five Things You Need to Know about Sex Mél Hogan Workers www.nomorepotlucks.org 4–5 Leslie Ann Jeffrey and Gayle MacDonald 52–56 Open Source Communities of the North, Unite Landlocked and Lonesome: Arctic Perspective Initiative | Dayna McLeod LIDS, Queer Feminism and Artist Run- 6–15 Culture in Boomin’ Calgary Anthea Black Langsamkeit: 57–63 Telling Stories in a Small World Florian Thalhofer | Matt Soar The Illustrated Gentleman 16–19 Elisha Lim 64–65 Chez les eux Massime Dousset “We Show Up”: Lesbians in Rural British 20–22 Columbia, 1950s-1970s Rachel Torrie Moonshine and Rainbows: 66–75 Queer, Young, and Rural… An Interview with Mary L. Gray Assimilation in the Land of Cows Mary L. Gray | Mandy Van Deven Bob Leahy 3 24–27 76–81 Queer in a Haystack: Queering Rural Space Sound Bites of Rural Nova Scotia NMP Rosemary MacAdam M-C MacPhee & Mél Hogan 28–35 82–87 The History of the Queer Crop Code: Memory Hoarding: Symbology in the Settlement Era An Interview with Rocky Green Cindy Baker Rocky Green | M-C MacPhee 36–51 88–105 www.nomorepotlucks.org Editorial Qui est relatif à la campagne ou caractéristique de celle-ci.
    [Show full text]
  • Gender and SEXUALITY “DISORDERS” and Alexandre Baril and Kathryn Trevenen Sexuality University of Ottawa, Canada Abstract
    Annual Review EXPLORING ABLEISM AND of Critical Psychology 11, 2014 CISNORMATIVITY IN THE CONCEPTUALIZATION OF IDENTITY Gender AND SEXUALITY “DISORDERS” and Alexandre Baril and Kathryn Trevenen Sexuality University of Ottawa, Canada Abstract This article explores different conceptualizations of, and debates about, Body Integrity Identity Disorder and Gender Identity Disorder to first examine how these “identity disorders” have been both linked to and distinguished from, the “sexual disorders” of apotemnophilia (the de- sire to amputate healthy limbs) and autogynephilia (the desire to per- ceive oneself as a woman). We argue that distinctions between identity disorders and sexual disorders or paraphilias reflect a troubling hier- archy in medical, social and political discourses between “legitimate” desires to transition or modify bodies (those based in identity claims) and “illegitimate” desires (those based in sexual desire or sexuality). This article secondly and more broadly explores how this hierarchy between “identity troubles” and paraphilias is rooted in a sex-negative, ableist, and cisnormative society, that makes it extremely difficult for activists, individuals, medical professionals, ethicists and anyone else, to conceptualize or understand the desires that some people express around transforming their bodies—whether the transformation relates to sex, gender or ability. We argue that instead of seeking to “explain” these desires in ways that further pathologize the people articulating them, we need to challenge the ableism and cisnormativity that require explanations for some bodies, subjectivities and desires while leaving dominant normative bodies and subjectivities intact. We thus end the article by exploring possibilities for forging connections between trans studies and critical disability studies that would open up options for listening and responding to the claims of transabled people.
    [Show full text]
  • Paraphilia - Wikipedia, the Freevisited Encyclopedia on 3/23/2016 Page 1 of 13
    Paraphilia - Wikipedia, the freevisited encyclopedia on 3/23/2016 Page 1 of 13 Paraphilia From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Paraphilia (also known as sexual perversion and Paraphilia sexual deviation) is the Classification and external resources experience of intense Specialty Psychiatry sexual arousal to atypical objects, situations, or ICD-10 F65 (http://apps.who.int/classifications/icd10/browse/2015/en#/F65) individuals.[1] No consensus has been found MeSH D010262 (https://www.nlm.nih.gov/cgi/mesh/2016/MB_cgi? for any precise border field=uid&term=D010262) between unusual sexual interests and paraphilic ones.[2][3] There is debate over which, if any, of the paraphilias should be listed in diagnostic manuals, such as the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) or the International Classification of Diseases (ICD). The number and taxonomy of paraphilias is under debate; one source lists as many as 549 types of paraphilias.[4] The DSM-5 has specific listings for eight paraphilic disorders.[5] Several sub- classifications of the paraphilias have been proposed, and some argue that a fully dimensional, spectrum or complaint-oriented approach would better reflect the evidence.[6][7] Contents ◾ 1 Terminology ◾ 1.1 Homosexuality and non-heterosexuality ◾ 2Causes ◾ 3 Diagnosis ◾ 3.1 Typical versus atypical interests ◾ 3.2 Intensity and specificity ◾ 3.3 DSM-I and DSM-II ◾ 3.4 DSM-III through DSM-IV ◾ 3.5 DSM-IV-TR ◾ 3.6 DSM-5 ◾ 4 Management ◾ 5 Epidemiology ◾ 6 Legal issues ◾ 7 See also ◾ 8 References https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paraphilia 3/23/2016 Paraphilia - Wikipedia, the freevisited encyclopedia on 3/23/2016 Page 2 of 13 ◾ 9 External links Terminology Many terms have been used to describe atypical sexual interests, and there remains debate regarding technical accuracy and perceptions of stigma.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 6: Sex Crime ❖ 193
    06-Helfgott-45520.qxd 2/12/2008 6:23 PM Page 191 6 ❖ Sex Crime Surely if humans, far and wide, wound the genitals, we hate them; we hate where they take us, what we do with them. —Andrea Dworkin (1987, p. 194) In March 2001, Armin Meiwes, a 42-year-old computer expert, murdered 43-year-old Bernd Juergen Brandes, a microchip engineer, in his home in Rotenburg, Germany. The two met after Brandes answered an Internet advertisement placed by Meiwes for a young man interested in “slaughter and consumption.” Meiwes testified in court that the killing began after the two engaged in sadomasochistic sex acts when, at Brandes’s request, he tried unsuccessfully to bite off Brandes’s penis, and then cut it off with a knife. The two then tried to eat the penis raw, then fried it in a pan trying unsuccessfully to eat it. Brandes eventually went unconscious from loss of blood after lying for hours in the bath- tub while Meiwes read magazines and drank wine. Meiwes then hung Brandes from a butcher’s hook and slaughtered him. The slaughter included severing his head, disem- bowelment, laying him out on a butcher block, and chopping his body into pieces. After the killing, Meiwes froze portions of the body, kept the skull in the freezer, buried other body parts in the garden, and ate 44 pounds of the body over the months to follow. Meiwes videotaped the entire event, watched it later to become sexually aroused, and spoke in court about how watching horror films as a child fueled his fantasies and long- time desires to commit such acts (“German Cannibal Tells of Fantasy,” December 3, 2003).
    [Show full text]
  • IN THIS ISSUE Governor Judiciary Regulatory Review and Evaluation Regulations Special Documents General Notices
    Issue Date: July 10, 2015 Volume 42 • Issue 14 • Pages 861—1002 IN THIS ISSUE Governor Judiciary Regulatory Review and Evaluation Regulations Special Documents General Notices Pursuant to State Government Article, §7-206, Annotated Code of Maryland, this issue contains all previously unpublished documents required to be published, and filed on or before June 22, 2015, 5 p.m. Pursuant to State Government Article, §7-206, Annotated Code of Maryland, I hereby certify that this issue contains all documents required to be codified as of June 22, 2015. Brian Morris Administrator, Division of State Documents Office of the Secretary of State Information About the Maryland Register and COMAR MARYLAND REGISTER HOW TO RESEARCH REGULATIONS The Maryland Register is an official State publication published An Administrative History at the end of every COMAR chapter gives every other week throughout the year. A cumulative index is information about past changes to regulations. To determine if there have published quarterly. been any subsequent changes, check the ‘‘Cumulative Table of COMAR The Maryland Register is the temporary supplement to the Code of Regulations Adopted, Amended, or Repealed’’ which is found online at Maryland Regulations. Any change to the text of regulations http://www.dsd.state.md.us/PDF/CumulativeTable.pdf. This table lists the published in COMAR, whether by adoption, amendment, repeal, or regulations in numerical order, by their COMAR number, followed by the emergency action, must first be published in the Register. citation to the Maryland Register in which the change occurred. The The following information is also published regularly in the Maryland Register serves as a temporary supplement to COMAR, and the Register: two publications must always be used together.
    [Show full text]
  • 1: Statement of Facts Statement of Facts Is a Book About Limits and Boundaries: Physical, Psychological, Legal, Literary, and Conceptual
    vanessa place 1: Statement of Facts Statement of Facts is a book about limits and boundaries: physical, psychological, legal, literary, and conceptual. It is about speech and its transcription, and the strange distortions of language that have evolved to serve the legal system. It is about actions that leave a mark on the body and the soul. Most readers will find themselves disoriented and longing to escape from the scarred flesh of this text, but it is a journey worth taking because it reveals just how frail the fabric of justice is. —Ken Gonzales-Day By repurposing legal prosecution and defense documents of violent sexual crimes verbatim, Statement of Facts takes on issues too messy to benefit from further elucidation which only grow more disturbing presented in their purest case material form. For some, what Statement of Facts brings into the public square is salacious, but Place is in effect saying: ‘I move the ball out of this arena and take it into this arena’ in order to pump up the socio political volume on this legal/moral battlefield. Her definition of injustice is sweeping.Statement of Facts does not care what the reader thinks about content and in essence, Place’s relationship to content is like Oprah Winfrey’s to money. It is straightforward, and you are free to project onto it whatever you need to. However you respond to this fierce book, it is indisputable that Statement of Facts has carved out a place for itself as a touchstone of poetic push back. As Pasadena Superior Court Judge Gilbert Alston famously quipped in his dismissal of a 1986 rape case because the victim was a prostitute: ‘A whore is a whore is a whore’—Statement of Facts counters by unflinchingly reminding us ‘a rape is a rape is a rape.’ —Kim Rosenfield Statement of Facts is poet/lawyer Vanessa Place’s masterful demonstration of day-for- night writing.
    [Show full text]
  • A NETPORN STUDIES READER Institute of Network Cultures
    C'LICK ME: A NETPORN STUDIES READER Institute of Network Cultures Edited by Katrien Jacobs, Marije Janssen, Matteo Pasquinelli Institute of Network Cultures, Amsterdam 2007 C'Lick Me: A Netporn Studies Reader is an anthology that collects the best materials of two years debate: from The Art and Politics of Netporn conference held in 2005 in Amsterdam to the 2007 C'Lick Me festival. C'Lick Me opens the field of ‘Internet pornology’. Based on non-conventional approaches, mixing academics, artists and activists, the C'Lick Me Reader reclaims a critical post-enthusiastic, post-censorship perspective on netporn, a dark field that has been dominated thus far by dodgy commerce and filtering. The C'Lick Me reader covers the rise of the netporn society from Usenet underground to the blogo- sphere, analyses economic data and search engines traffic, compares sex work with the work of fantasy, disability and accessibility. The C'Lick Me reader also expands the notion of digital desire, and smashes the predicatable boundaries of porn debates, depicting a broader libidinal spectrum from fetish subcultures to digital alienation, from code pornography to war pornography. The reader concludes by re-contextualising the Edited by Katrien Jacobs, Marije Janssen, Matteo Pasquinelli queer discourse into a post-porn scenario. Contributions by: Adam Arvidsson, Franco 'Bifo' Berardi, Manuel Bonik, Mikita Brottman, Florian Cramer, Samantha Culp, Barbara DeGenevieve, Mark Dery, Michael Goddard, Stewart Home, A NETPORN STUDIES READER Katrien Jacobs, Marije Janssen, Julie Levin Russo, Regina Lynn, Sergio Messina, Mireille Miller-Young, Tim Noonan, Francesco Edited by Katrien Jacobs, Marije Janssen, Matteo Pasquinelli Macarone Palmieri aka Warbear, Matteo Pasquinelli, Audacia Ray, Andreas Schaale, Nishant Shah, Tim Stüttgen, Matthew Zook.
    [Show full text]
  • Incognito – March 2018
    InCognito For all your study-related needs and feeds. March 2018 Suggestions, feedback or comments? Let us know at [email protected]. Internships so far: the good, the bad and the funny By Iris Proff What was your most surprising realization I have realized that science can give you about the scientific world so far? an exciting life, but you need to be Since a couple of weeks, all of us first years Science is sometimes seen as this patient to successfully deal with those swarmed out to various labs around fascinating process where we discover frustrating moments that come and go. Amsterdam to get some hands on experience lots about many interesting topics (for on scientific practice. Some of us spend our instance, the brain). In a sense, it is! ...but Andrea Lind days programming models or dive into the in the everyday, what we do is mostly Hi Andrea! What are you working on? world of data analysis. Others train rats, figuring out why things do not work the I take part in a project at the Social Brain torture humans to perform EEG way they should. So it's also a lot about Lab where we investigate empathy and experiments. Our daily routines might be learning life skills, I would say… prosocial learning. quite different, the struggles we face and realizations we make are actually pretty Mariana Duque Quintero What is the thing that surprised you most similar! I interviewed four MBCS students Hola Mariana! What do you do for your up to now? about their internships.
    [Show full text]