20111102 FOI Annual Report 2010-2011 Final V1
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
HOUSE of ASSEMBLY Page 2215 HOUSE of ASSEMBLY Thursday 25 November 2010 the SPEAKER (Hon
Confidential and Subject to Revision Thursday 25 November 2010 HOUSE OF ASSEMBLY Page 2215 HOUSE OF ASSEMBLY Thursday 25 November 2010 The SPEAKER (Hon. L.R. Breuer) took the chair at 11:01 and read prayers. UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE (TRUST PROPERTY) AMENDMENT BILL Ms CHAPMAN (Bragg) (10:32): Obtained leave and introduced a bill for an act to amend the University of Adelaide Act 1971. Read a first time. Ms CHAPMAN (Bragg) (10:33): I move: That this bill be now read a second time. I move the University of Adelaide (Trust Property) Amendment Bill with a heavy heart. However, it is supported by the Liberal opposition and I am pleased to have its support. It is a bill to amend the University of Adelaide Act 1971. Members will be aware that the University of Adelaide was established by an act of this parliament, the first in South Australia and the third in Australia. It has a proud and respected history as an institution in this state. In 2003, the structure and independence of the governance of our universities was debated as a result of introduced bills for our three public universities in South Australia by then minister Lomax-Smith and supported by the opposition. An essential element of that bill was to provide greater autonomy in the handling of the university's own affairs, including its financial affairs and, in particular, the capacity to be able to buy, sell, lease, encumber or deal with its assets, and particularly real property. However, the reform retained in it an obligation to secure cabinet approval for very substantial property it owned, including the North Terrace precinct, Roseworthy and Waite campuses. -
A Speech Delivered by Mr Gary Lockwood – (President of The
A speech delivered by Mr Gary Lockwood – (President of the Australian Society for the Study of Labour History Adelaide Branch) at a meeting of the Florey Sub Branch of the ALP on Monday 21 st February 2011. Ladies and Gentleman fellow members of the ALP ...Comrades Thank you your introduction and I must say I am very proud to be the President of the Australian Society for the Study of Labour History (Adelaide Branch) and I would have greatly appreciated the opportunity to tell you more about a very fine Labour Organisation/History Organisation – how important it is, and what it does. But contemporary political times, has led me to take on another subject. In November 2010 I attended the Annual General Meeting at Sydney University of what is quite an academically orientated organisation – it is the peak history recording body of its type in Australia – highly held on an International base and historians long to have their works published in ‘Labour History’ – a publication that is produced twice yearly and this year on the organisation 50 th Anniversary...issue number 100 will be released. But it is about issue number 99 that I want to talk to you about ...because I have chosen an article in this issue to highlight the subject matter that I hope will be of interest to you all. I was at the Annual General Meeting of Labour History at Sydney University and just before the meeting commenced this ‘freshly off the press’ edition of Labour History arrived – someone handed me a copy and said ‘Oh Gary – you might just as well have your SA copy – it will save postage’ – I took it and sat down. -
South Australian Ministry As at 8 February 2011
South Australian Ministry as at 8 February 2011 Mike Rann Premier Minister for Economic Development Minister for Social Inclusion Minister for the Arts Minister for Sustainability and Climate Change John Rau Deputy Premier Attorney-General Minister for Justice Minister for Urban Development and Planning and the City of Adelaide Minister for Tourism Minister for Food Marketing Bernard Finnigan Leader in the Legislative Council Minister for Industrial Relations Minister for State/Local Government Relations Minister for Gambling Patrick Conlon Minister for Transport Minister for Infrastructure Kevin Foley Minister for Defence Industries Minister for Police Minister for Emergency Services Minister for Motor Sport Minister Assisting the Premier with the Olympic Dam Expansion Project John Hill Minister for Health Minister for Mental Health and Substance Abuse Minister for the Southern Suburbs Minister Assisting the Premier in the Arts Jay Weatherill Minister for Education Minister for Early Childhood Development Minister for Science and the Information Economy Jennifer Rankine Minister for Families and Communities Minister for Housing Minister for Ageing Minister for Disability Paul Caica Minister for the Environment and Conservation Minister for the River Murray Minister for Water Gail Gago Minister for Regional Development Minister for the Public Sector Management Minister for the Status of Women Minster for Consumer Affairs Minister for Government Enterprises Tom Koutsantonis Minister for Mineral Resources Development Minister for Industry -
Informing the Euthanasia Debate: Perceptions of Australian Politicians
1368 UNSW Law Journal Volume 41(4) INFORMING THE EUTHANASIA DEBATE: PERCEPTIONS OF AUSTRALIAN POLITICIANS ANDREW MCGEE,* KELLY PURSER,** CHRISTOPHER STACKPOOLE,*** BEN WHITE,**** LINDY WILLMOTT***** AND JULIET DAVIS****** In the debate on euthanasia or assisted dying, many different arguments have been advanced either for or against legal reform in the academic literature, and much contemporary academic research seeks to engage with these arguments. However, very little research has been undertaken to track the arguments that are being advanced by politicians when Bills proposing reform are debated in Parliament. Politicians will ultimately decide whether legislative reform will proceed and, if so, in what form. It is therefore essential to know what arguments the politicians are advancing in support of or against legal reform so that these arguments can be assessed and scrutinised. This article seeks to fill this gap by collecting, synthesising and mapping the pro- and anti-euthanasia and assisted dying arguments advanced by Australian politicians, starting from the time the first ever euthanasia Bill was introduced. I INTRODUCTION Euthanasia attracts continued media, societal and political attention.1 In particular, voluntary active euthanasia (‘VAE’) and physician-assisted suicide * BA (Hons) (Lancaster), LLB (Hons) (QUT), LLM (QUT), PhD (Essex); Senior Lecturer, Australian Centre for Health Law Research, Faculty of Law, Queensland University of Technology. ** BA/LLB (Hons) (UNE), PhD (UNE); Senior Lecturer, Australian Centre for Health Law Research, Faculty of Law, Queensland University of Technology. *** LLB/BBus (Hons) (QUT), BCL (Oxford). **** LLB (Hons) (QUT), DPhil (Oxford), Professor, Australian Centre for Health Law Research, Faculty of Law, Queensland University of Technology. ***** BCom (UQ), LLB (Hons) (UQ), LLM (Cambridge), PhD (QUT); Professor, Australian Centre for Health Law Research, Faculty of Law, Queensland University of Technology. -
High Court Fight
PUBLIC SECTOR www.cpsu.asn.auReview December 2011 Meeting Expectations 0RYLQJ IRUZDUG LQ WKH KRSH RI D QHZ $PRQJ WKRVH WKH 36$ OHDGHUVKLS KDV PHW VSLULWRIFRRSHUDWLRQDQGWUXVWWKH36$ ZLWKKDYHEHHQ KDVEHHQSOHDVHGWRPHHWZLWKWKHQHZ 7KH+RQ0LFKDHO2·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ÀFDQW 7KH3UHPLHUDGYLVHGWKDWZKLOHKHSODQQHG 7KH+RQ-HQQLIHU5DQNLQH03 IRUVLJQLÀFDQWFKDQJHWRWKH3XEOLF6HFWRULW 0LQLVWHUIRU3ROLFH ZRXOGEH´HYROXWLRQDU\QRWUHYROXWLRQDU\µ 0LQLVWHUIRU&RUUHFWLRQDO6HUYLFHV 7KH36$ZHOFRPHVRSHQDQGWUDQVSDUHQW 0LQLVWHUIRU(PHUJHQF\6HUYLFHV FRPPXQLFDWLRQ ZLWK WKH 3UHPLHU DQG ZLOO 0LQLVWHUIRU5RDG6DIHW\ FRQWLQXH WR -
Euthanasia Politics in the Australian State and Territorial Parliaments
Euthanasia Politics in the Australian State and Territorial Parliaments A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of The Australian National University Alison Plumb School of Politics and International Relations May 2014 ii I certify that the thesis I have presented for examination for the PhD degree of the Australian National University is solely my own work. iii iv Table of Contents List of Tables and Figures……………………………………………………………...vii Acknowledgements……………………………………………………………………...ix Abstract…………………………………………………………………………………xi Chapter 1:Introduction………………………….…………………………………….1 The Aims of the Thesis………………………………………………………………….1 Why Study Voluntary Euthanasia?...................................................................................2 End of Life Choices and the Law in Australia…………………………………………12 Definition of Key Terms………………………………………………………………..13 Key Findings and the Structure of the Thesis…………………………………………..16 Chapter 2: Investigating Euthanasia Politics……………………...………………...21 Research on ‘Morality Politics’…....…………………………………………………...21 The Debate Over Voluntary Euthanasia………………………………………………..23 The Political Processes Involved……………………………………………………….27 Research Questions……………………………………………………………………..39 The Original Contribution of the Thesis………………………………………………..41 Methodology………………...………………………………………………………….42 Research Methods………………………………………………………………………46 Conclusion……………………………………………………………………………...52 Chapter 3: Voluntary Euthanasia Law Reform in the Northern Territory………53 The Factors Contributing to Success: Nitschke and