Life Cycles and Secondary Production of Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, and Trichoptera (Insecta) Under an Extreme Continental Climate (River Kharaa, Mongolia)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Life Cycles and Secondary Production of Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, and Trichoptera (Insecta) Under an Extreme Continental Climate (River Kharaa, Mongolia) Faculty of Environmental Sciences Life cycles and secondary production of Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, and Trichoptera (Insecta) under an extreme continental climate (River Kharaa, Mongolia) Dissertation for awarding the academic degree Doctor rerum naturalium (Dr. rer. nat.) Submitted by MSc. Saulyegul Avlyush born on 10 December, 1982 in Darkhan-Uul province, Mongolia Reviewer: Prof. Dr. Dietrich Borchardt Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ) Department of Aquatic Ecosystem Analysis and Management Prof. Dr. Markus Weitere Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ) Department of River Ecology Prof. Dr. Rüdiger Wagner University of Kassel Institute for Biology Dresden, 2013 Defense date: 12 December 2013 Explanation of the doctoral candidate This is to certify that this copy is fully congruent with the original copy of the dissertation with the topic: „Life cycles and secondary production of Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, and Trichoptera (Insecta) under an extreme continental climate (River Kharaa, Mongolia)“ Magdeburg, 24.05.2013 …………………………………………............ Place, Date Avlyush, Saulyegul ………………………………………….............. Signature (surname, first name) Acknowledgements The thesis described here was performed within the research and development project ‘Integrated Water Resources Management in Central Asia: Model Region Mongolia’ (IWRM- MoMo) funded by the German Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF Grant 0033L003A) under the “Research for Sustainability” Programme and supported by the German Academic Exchange Program-DAAD (A/07/99089). Foremost, I owe my deepest gratitude to my supervisor Prof. Dr. Dietrich Borchardt for giving me the chance to accomplish my Ph.D research under his supervision. He opened the door for me to find the diverse cultural environment of researchers and students and enjoyable scientific atmosphere at the Center for Environmental Systems Research (CESR), University Kassel and at the Department of Aquatic Ecosystem Analysis and Management (ASAM) at the Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ) in Magdeburg. I thank him especially for introducing me to the scientific branch known as aquatic ecology. Also for his assistance in my understanding of Mongolia’s unique ecological conditions in running water ecosystems and how different they are in Mongolia compared to European conditions. Further, special thanks for his time and countless hours of scientific discussions and proofreading of my research article and thesis. I also extend my sincere thanks to Dr. Ch. Javzan from the Institute of Geoecology, Mongolian Academy of Science and Prof. Dr. R. Samiya, and Prof. Dr. N. Soninkhishig from the National University of Mongolia for giving me the opportunities to work in this research field, encouraging my ideas and accepting my requests. I am indebted to all my current and former colleagues at CESR and UFZ including Daniel, Madlen, Philipp, Ralf, Rehan and other colleagues in the ASAM group for their friendship and encouragement. I am grateful to Melanie Hartwig and Michael Schäffer for the translation of my theses and summary into German and Andrew Kaus and Philipp Theuring for helping me correct my writing in English. I am very thankful to Michael Schäffer and Mario Brauns for the review of my thesis and giving valuable comments. I would like to express my special thanks to my handling supervisor, colleague and friend Michael Schäffer. I have got uncountable and invaluable knowledge from him. He accompanied me working in the field, analyzing the samples in the laboratory, analyzing the data and writing the research article. Beside the research work, he has shared in my happiness, troubles and sorrows. Further, I would like to express my appreciation to Ts. Batchuluun and N. Natsagnyam, A. Jargal, Emee, Zorigoo as well as several Mongolian students for their help during the expeditions and laboratory analysis. I sincerely thank B. Byambajav and Ts. Otgonkhuu and I call them as sisters. Thank you very much for your moral support and patience when I have expressed different personal characteristics of mine. I also wish to thank all of my friends for being there for me when I needed them; they all know who they are. i Finally, and most importantly, my deepest appreciation and love to my parents, my sister and brother. I would never reach this far in my academic career without the support of my parents. I dedicate this dissertation to my sister Erkyegul, you are in my heart every day since you left us. I am never disillusioned from my deepest hope to meet you again one day. ii Theses 1. Since the 1990s water quality monitoring projects using aquatic insects or macroinvertebrates as bioindication in Mongolia has mostly occurred in rivers drainage to the Arctic Ocean. They have been conducted to identify different anthropogentic stressors and impacts upon these running water ecosystems. However, there are still knowledge gaps and uncertainties concerning the research of these macroinvertebrates, in particular, a life cycle study of representative species are one such section of information missing. Therefore, this study was conducted within the framework of the biomonitoring program in the Kharaa River Basin under the research aims of the project entitled ‘Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM) in Central Asia: Model Region Mongolia (MoMo)’. 2. The specific aim for the study was to determine their life cycles and secondary production of selected species in the Kharaa River Basin, Mongolia, where these animals are exposed to harsh environment conditions. Mongolia’s climate is characterised by long, dry and cold winters and hot summers with low precipitation and a high number of clear, sunny days per year. An important hydrological characteristic of the Kharaa River is the occurrence of complete ice coverage from November to April. The seasonal variation in the Kharaa River has been documented by the continuous air and water temperature recordings during the sampling years of 2007 - 2009. Another character of the Kharaa River is the substrate composition which changes substantially from upstream to downstream. 3. The main challenges for the research project were selecting the most suitable methods for use in the field sampling campaigns as well as establishing biomonitoring criteria for the target species under the extreme harsh climatic conditions. The research also sorts to address the pre-existing taxonomical identification problems. Consequently, a multi- habitat quantitative sampling method, and emergence traps type ‘Model week’ were selected. Five specific traits were chosen as selection criteria from the literature, where the life cycles of numerous species were investigated under comparable conditions to this study. Based on those five distinct criteria, a total of 18 species from EPT group (Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, and Trichoptera) were selected for deeper analysis. 4. The main purpose of this study was to provide basic autecological information of 18 EPT species in the Kharaa River Basin, Mongolia, focusing on (i) larval and emergence densities, (ii) life cycle periods, and (iii) secondary production and growth rates. The key hypothesis was to test whether or not EPT species in the Kharaa River have special adaptations to survive the harsh winter conditions in Mongolia and reduced secondary production. Diverse life cycles and estimations of density, secondary production and growth rates from field data showed a wide spectrum of structural responses to a variety of natural and anthropogenic stressors in the aquatic ecosystem. iii 5. The 3-year study (2007-2009) of the life cycles of eighteen selected species according to the larval body size distribution and emergence period showed five different life cycle types including strict univoltinism, a flexible life cycle, a short and a long life cycle. The results of these life cycles for the selected 18 species and their development periods were compared to other studies at different taxonomical levels. However, a comparison at a species level was only possible for one macroinvertebrate (Ephemeroptera: Ephemera orientalis) within the literature available. On the one hand, it indicated a characteristic biogeographic distribution of these species; while on the other hand, it illustrated a knowledge gap within the species description. Considering the above mentioned hypothesis, Ephemera orientalis had a flexible life cycle that displayed an extended larval development period in the Kharaa River. 6. The production parameters were available to estimate the total of 15 species based on data from one year of sampling. The estimated annual productions of larvae at three investigated sites in the upper and middle stretches of the river in the year 2009 was in the range from 0.08 g DW m-2 y-1 to 18.7 g DW m-2 y-1. Biomass was in the range from 10.6 mg DW m-2 to 907.8 mg DW m-2, and the annual production to biomass rate (P/B) was in the range from 0.6 y-1 to 23.5 y-1 respectively. The value from the secondary production estimates from 13 species was lower than pre-determined criteria for low production (5.4 g DW m-2 y-1). The growth rates were calculated only for univoltine summer and winter cycle species. According to the general classification of growth rate for macroinvertebrates, all univoltine winter cycle species were classified as species with a low growth rate (up to 1.4% day-1) and univoltine summer cycle species were slightly higher than the criteria range. 7. This thesis provided the first quantitative results on the life
Recommended publications
  • Download Book of Abstracts IB2019
    BOOK OF ABSTRACTS Université de la Réunion Campus du Moufia 2 Island Biology Third International Conference on Island Ecology, Evolution and Conservation 8-13 July 2019 University of La R´eunion Saint Denis, France Book of Abstracts Editors: Olivier Flores Claudine Ah-Peng Nicholas Wilding Description of contents This document contains the collection of abstracts describing the research works presented at the third international conference on island ecology, evolution and conservation, Island Biology 2019, held in Saint Denis (La R´eunion,8-13 July 2019). In the following order, the different parts of this document concern Plenary sessions, Symposia, Regular sessions, and Poster presentations organized in thematic sections. The last part of the document consists of an author index with the names of all authors and links to the corresponding abstracts. Each abstract is referenced by a unique number 6-digits number indicated at the bottom of each page on the right. This reference number points to the online version of the abstract on the conference website using URL https://sciencesconf.org:ib2019/xxxxxx, where xxxxxx is the reference of the abstract. 4 Table of contents Plenary Sessions 19 Introduction to natural history of the Mascarene islands, Dominique Strasberg . 20 The history, current status, and future of the protected areas of Madagascar, Steven M. Goodman............................................ 21 The island biogeography of alien species, Tim Blackburn.................. 22 What can we learn about invasion ecology from ant invasions of islands ?, Lori Lach . 23 Orchids, moths, and birds on Madagascar, Mauritius, and Reunion: island systems with well-constrained timeframes for species interactions and trait change, Susanne Renner .
    [Show full text]
  • Isoperla Bilineata (Group)
    Steven R Beaty Biological Assessment Branch North Carolina Division of Water Resources [email protected] 2 DISCLAIMER: This manual is unpublished material. The information contained herein is provisional and is intended only to provide a starting point for the identification of Isoperla within North Carolina. While many of the species treated here can be found in other eastern and southeastern states, caution is advised when attempting to identify Isoperla outside of the study area. Revised and corrected versions are likely to follow. The user assumes all risk and responsibility of taxonomic determinations made in conjunction with this manual. Recommended Citation Beaty, S. R. 2015. A morass of Isoperla nymphs (Plecoptera: Perlodidae) in North Carolina: a photographic guide to their identification. Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Water Resources, Biological Assessment Branch, Raleigh. Nymphs used in this study were reared and associated at the NCDENR Biological Assessment Branch lab (BAB) unless otherwise noted. All photographs in this manual were taken by the Eric Fleek (habitus photos) and Steve Beaty (lacinial photos) unless otherwise noted. They may be used with proper credit. 3 Keys and Literature for eastern Nearctic Isoperla Nymphs Frison, T. H. 1935. The Stoneflies, or Plecoptera, of Illinois. Illinois Natural History Bulletin 20(4): 281-471. • while not containing species of isoperlids that occur in NC, it does contain valuable habitus and mouthpart illustrations of species that are similar to those found in NC (I. bilineata, I richardsoni) Frison, T. H. 1942. Studies of North American Plecoptera with special reference to the fauna of Illinois. Illinois Natural History Bulletin 22(2): 235-355.
    [Show full text]
  • New Records of Stoneflies (Plecoptera) with an Annotated Checklist of the Species for Pennsylvania
    The Great Lakes Entomologist Volume 29 Number 3 - Fall 1996 Number 3 - Fall 1996 Article 2 October 1996 New Records of Stoneflies (Plecoptera) With an Annotated Checklist of the Species for Pennsylvania E. C. Masteller Behrend College Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Masteller, E. C. 1996. "New Records of Stoneflies (Plecoptera) With an Annotated Checklist of the Species for Pennsylvania," The Great Lakes Entomologist, vol 29 (3) Available at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle/vol29/iss3/2 This Peer-Review Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Biology at ValpoScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Great Lakes Entomologist by an authorized administrator of ValpoScholar. For more information, please contact a ValpoScholar staff member at [email protected]. Masteller: New Records of Stoneflies (Plecoptera) With an Annotated Checklis 1996 THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOlOGIST 107 NEW RECORDS OF STONEFLIES IPLECOPTERA} WITH AN ANNOTATED CHECKLIST OF THE SPECIES FOR PENNSYLVANIA E.C. Masteller1 ABSTRACT Original collections now record 134 species in nine families and 42 gen­ era. Seventeen new state records include, Allocapnia wrayi, Alloperla cau­ data, Leuctra maria, Soyedina carolinensis, Tallaperla elisa, Perlesta decipi· ens, P. placida, Neoperla catharae, N. occipitalis, N. stewarti, Cult us decisus decisus, Isoperla francesca, 1. frisoni, 1. lata,1. nana, 1. slossonae, Malirekus hastatus. Five species are removed from the list ofspecies for Pennsylvania. Surdick and Kim (1976) originally recorded 90 species of stoneflies in nine families and 32 genera from Pennsylvania. Since that time, Stark et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity of Minnesota Caddisflies (Insecta: Trichoptera)
    Conservation Biology Research Grants Program Division of Ecological Services Minnesota Department of Natural Resources BIODIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA CADDISFLIES (INSECTA: TRICHOPTERA) A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY DAVID CHARLES HOUGHTON IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Ralph W. Holzenthal, Advisor August 2002 1 © David Charles Houghton 2002 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS As is often the case, the research that appears here under my name only could not have possibly been accomplished without the assistance of numerous individuals. First and foremost, I sincerely appreciate the assistance of my graduate advisor, Dr. Ralph. W. Holzenthal. His enthusiasm, guidance, and support of this project made it a reality. I also extend my gratitude to my graduate committee, Drs. Leonard C. Ferrington, Jr., Roger D. Moon, and Bruce Vondracek, for their helpful ideas and advice. I appreciate the efforts of all who have collected Minnesota caddisflies and accessioned them into the University of Minnesota Insect Museum, particularly Roger J. Blahnik, Donald G. Denning, David A. Etnier, Ralph W. Holzenthal, Jolanda Huisman, David B. MacLean, Margot P. Monson, and Phil A. Nasby. I also thank David A. Etnier (University of Tennessee), Colin Favret (Illinois Natural History Survey), and Oliver S. Flint, Jr. (National Museum of Natural History) for making caddisfly collections available for my examination. The laboratory assistance of the following individuals-my undergraduate "army"-was critical to the processing of the approximately one half million caddisfly specimens examined during this study and I extend my thanks: Geoffery D. Archibald, Anne M.
    [Show full text]
  • Nymphs of North American Perlodinae Genera (Plecoptera: Perlodidae)
    Great Basin Naturalist Volume 44 Number 3 Article 1 7-31-1984 Nymphs of North American Perlodinae genera (Plecoptera: Perlodidae) Kenneth W. Stewart North Texas State University, Denton, Texas Bill P. Stark Mississippi College, Clinton, Mississippi Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn Recommended Citation Stewart, Kenneth W. and Stark, Bill P. (1984) "Nymphs of North American Perlodinae genera (Plecoptera: Perlodidae)," Great Basin Naturalist: Vol. 44 : No. 3 , Article 1. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn/vol44/iss3/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Great Basin Naturalist by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. The Great Basin Naturalist Published at Provo, Utah, by Brigham Young University ISSN 0017-3614 Volume 44 July 31, 1984 No. 3 NYMPHS OF NORTH AMERICAN PERLODINAE GENERA (PLECOPTERA: PERLODIDAE)' Kenneth VV. Stewart- and Bill P. Stark' Abstract.— Nymphs of the type or other representative species of the 22 North American Perlodinae genera are comparatively described and illustrated for the first time. The first complete generic key for the subfamily incorporates recent nymph discoveries and revisions in classification. References to all previous nymph descriptions and illustrations and major life cycle and food habits studies are given for the 53 North American species in the subfamilv, and a listing of species and their current distributions by states and provinces is provided for each genus. The previously unknown nymph of Chcrnokrihts misnomus is described and illustrated.
    [Show full text]
  • Nabs 2004 Final
    CURRENT AND SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHIES ON BENTHIC BIOLOGY 2004 Published August, 2005 North American Benthological Society 2 FOREWORD “Current and Selected Bibliographies on Benthic Biology” is published annu- ally for the members of the North American Benthological Society, and summarizes titles of articles published during the previous year. Pertinent titles prior to that year are also included if they have not been cited in previous reviews. I wish to thank each of the members of the NABS Literature Review Committee for providing bibliographic information for the 2004 NABS BIBLIOGRAPHY. I would also like to thank Elizabeth Wohlgemuth, INHS Librarian, and library assis- tants Anna FitzSimmons, Jessica Beverly, and Elizabeth Day, for their assistance in putting the 2004 bibliography together. Membership in the North American Benthological Society may be obtained by contacting Ms. Lucinda B. Johnson, Natural Resources Research Institute, Uni- versity of Minnesota, 5013 Miller Trunk Highway, Duluth, MN 55811. Phone: 218/720-4251. email:[email protected]. Dr. Donald W. Webb, Editor NABS Bibliography Illinois Natural History Survey Center for Biodiversity 607 East Peabody Drive Champaign, IL 61820 217/333-6846 e-mail: [email protected] 3 CONTENTS PERIPHYTON: Christine L. Weilhoefer, Environmental Science and Resources, Portland State University, Portland, O97207.................................5 ANNELIDA (Oligochaeta, etc.): Mark J. Wetzel, Center for Biodiversity, Illinois Natural History Survey, 607 East Peabody Drive, Champaign, IL 61820.................................................................................................................6 ANNELIDA (Hirudinea): Donald J. Klemm, Ecosystems Research Branch (MS-642), Ecological Exposure Research Division, National Exposure Re- search Laboratory, Office of Research & Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 26 W. Martin Luther King Dr., Cincinnati, OH 45268- 0001 and William E.
    [Show full text]
  • Stark Et Al Stonefliy Common Names 1998.Pmd
    Ohio Biological Survey Notes 1: 1-18, 1998. © Ohio Biological Survey Common Names of Stoneflies (Plecoptera) from the United States and Canada BILL P. S TARK1, KENNETH W. STEWART2, STANLEY W. SZCZYTKO3, AND RICHARD W. BAUMANN4 1 Dept. of Biology, Mississippi College, Clinton, MS 39058. 2 Dept. of Biological Sciences, Univ. of North Texas, Denton, TX 76203. 3 College of Natural Resources, Univ. of Wisconsin, Stevens Point, WI 54481. 4 Dept. of Zoology, Brigham Young Univ., Provo, UT 84602 Introduction Stoneflies are one of the important and often dominant orders of insects in North American stream ecosystems. They have remained generally poorly known to nonspecialists because of their cryptic habits, and often nocturnal activity. Larger species, or those that are colorful or important to flyfishers, have acquired regional or local names that vary from place to place. Names such as blacks, browns, greens, yellows, rollwings, needleflies, broadbacks, sallies, olives, stones, willowflies, or the generic names Acroneuria, Isoperla, Pteronarcys and others have become firmly established in fly fishing literature, and are used by flyfishers. The following list of recommended common names of Plecoptera species from the United States and Canada was originally formulated by us, acting as a subcommittee of the North American Benthological Society Scientific and Common Names Committee. This committee was charged with producing comprehensive species checklists of North American aquatic invertebrates, including insects with assigned common names. The first of the intended series of special publications by the American Fisheries Society of scientific and common names of U.S. aquatic invertebrates was of mollusks (Turgeon et al., 1988); the volumes on Insecta never followed.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix Page
    NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES Division of Water Quality Environmental Sciences Section August 2004 This page was intentionally left blank NCDENR, Division of Water Quality Basinwide Assessment Report – Cape Fear River Basin - August 2004 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF APPENDICIES ........................................................................................................................ 5 LIST OF TABLES................................................................................................................................... 7 LIST OF FIGURES .............................................................................................................................. 11 OVERVIEW OF THE WATER QUALITY OF THE CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN.....................................17 EXECUTIVE SUMMARIES BY PROGRAM AREA.................................................................................27 FISHERIES ...................................................................................................................................... 27 BENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATES............................................................................................. 30 LAKE ASSESSMENT....................................................................................................................... 32 PHYTOPLANKTON MONITORING................................................................................................. 33 AMBIENT MONITORING................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Dosdall and Lehmkuhl 1979 Qev15n1 3 116 CC Released.Pdf
    This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, 171 Second Street, Suite 300, San Francisco, California, 94105, USA. STONEFLIES (PLECOPTERA) OF SASKATCHEWAN LLOYD M. DOSDALL1 Biology Department University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N0W0 D.M. LEHMKUHL Biology Department University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon, Saskatchewan Quaestiones Entomologicae S7N0W0 15:3-116 1979 Forty-one species, twenty-nine genera and eight families of Plecoptera are recorded from Saskatche wan. Distinguishing characters are given and keys are provided. Species recorded are: Pteronarcys dorsata (Say), Pteronarcella badia (Hagen), Taeniopteryx nivalis (Fitch), Oemopteryx fosketti (Packer), Capnia coloradensis Claassen, Capnia confusa Claassen, Capnia gracilaria Claassen, Capnia vernalis Newport, Paracapnia angulata Hanson, Isocapnia crinita (Needham and Claassen), Isocapnia missourii Ricker, Utacapnia trava (Nebeker and Gaufin), Nemoura rickeri Jewett, Shipsa rotunda (Claassen), Amphinemura linda (Ricker), Zapada cinctipes (Banks), Malenka californica (Claassenj, Podmosta delicatula (Claassen, Paraleuctra vershina Gaufin and Ricker, Leuctra ferruginea (Walker), Acroneuria abnormis (Newman), Acroneuria lycorias (Newman), Hesperoperla pacifica (Banks), C'laassenia sabulosa (Banks), Paragnetina media (Walker), Perlesta placida (Hagen), Isoperla bilineata (Say),
    [Show full text]
  • Some Evolutionary Trends in Plecoptera
    Some Evolutionary Trends in Plecoptera W. E. Ricker, Indiana University Structural Evolution The families and subfam ilies of stoneflies recognized by the writer are as follows: Distribution A. Suborder Holognatha (Setipalpia) Eustheniidae Eustheniinae Australia and New Zealand Diamphipnoinae Southern South America Austroperlidae Australia and New Zealand Leptoperlidae Leptoperlinae Australia and New Zealand; Fiji Islands; temperate South America Scopurinae Japan Peltoperlidae North and South America; east Asia and the bordering islands, south to Borneo Nemouridae Notonemourinae Australia and New Zealand Nemourinae Holarctic region Leuctrinae Holarctic region; South Africa; Tierra del Fuego Capniinae Holarctic Taeniopteryginae Holarctic Pteronarcidae North America; eastern Siberia B. Suborder Systellognatha (Filipalpia) Perlodidae Isogeninae Holarctic Perlodinae Holarctic Isoperlinae Holarctic Chloroperlidae Paraperlinae Nearctic Chloroperlinae Holarctic Perlidae Perlinae Old-world tropics, and the temperature regions of Africa, Eurasia and eastern North America Acroneuriinae North and South America; eastern and southeastern Asia 1 Contribution number 421 from the Department of Zoology, [ndiana University. 197 198 Indiana Academy of Science Tillyard places the ancestors of present day stoneflies in the family Lemmatophoridae of the Permian order Protoperlaria. These insects had small wing-like lateral expansions of the prothorax, and a fairly well- developed posterior (concave) median vein in both wings, both of which have been lost in modern stoneflies. Developments in some of the mor- phological features which have been most studied are as follows: Nymphal mouth parts: The holognathous families are characterized by bulky mandibles, by short thick palpi, and by having the paraglossae and glossae of the labium about equal in length. In the adult the man- dibles remain large and functional.
    [Show full text]
  • The Innovation of the Final Moult and the Origin of Insect Metamorphosis Royalsocietypublishing.Org/Journal/Rstb Xavier Belles
    The innovation of the final moult and the origin of insect metamorphosis royalsocietypublishing.org/journal/rstb Xavier Belles Institute of Evolutionary Biology (CSIC-Universitat Pompeu Fabra), Passeig Maritim 37, 08003 Barcelona, Spain XB, 0000-0002-1566-303X Review The three modes of insect postembryonic development are ametaboly, hemi- Cite this article: Belles X. 2019 The metaboly and holometaboly, the latter being considered the only significant innovation of the final moult and the origin of metamorphosis mode. However, the emergence of hemimetaboly, with the genuine innovation of the final moult, represents the origin of insect metamor- insect metamorphosis. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B phosis and a necessary step in the evolution of holometaboly. Hemimetaboly 374: 20180415. derives from ametaboly and might have appeared as a consequence of wing http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2018.0415 emergence in Pterygota, in the early Devonian. In extant insects, the final moult is mainly achieved through the degeneration of the prothoracic gland Accepted: 27 March 2019 (PG), after the formation of the winged and reproductively competent adult stage. Metamorphosis, including the formation of the mature wings and the degeneration of the PG, is regulated by the MEKRE93 pathway, through One contribution of 13 to a theme issue ‘The which juvenile hormone precludes the adult morphogenesis by repressing evolution of complete metamorphosis’. the expression of transcription factor E93, which triggers this change. The MEKRE93 pathway appears conserved in extant metamorphosing insects, which suggest that this pathway was operative in the Pterygota last Subject Areas: common ancestor. We propose that the final moult, and the consequent hemi- evolution, developmental biology metabolan metamorphosis, is a monophyletic innovation and that the role of E93 as a promoter of wing formation and the degeneration of the PG was Keywords: mechanistically crucial for their emergence.
    [Show full text]
  • Trichoptera, Apataniidae) from China
    European Journal of Taxonomy 333: 1–20 ISSN 2118-9773 https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2017.333 www.europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu 2017 · Xu J. et al. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Research article urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:60C69946-44B4-4A85-86EF-F63D489E1E4E Associations and a new species of the genus Apatidelia (Trichoptera, Apataniidae) from China Jihua XU 1, Yue XIE 2, Beixin WANG 3 & Changhai SUN 4,* 1, 2, 3, 4 Lab of Insect Taxonomy, College of Plant Protection, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China. * Corresponding author: [email protected] 1 Email: [email protected] 2 Email: [email protected] 3 Email: [email protected] 1 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:8F03EA8B-8C81-48FD-8450-CD811CB220F6 2 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:7E32A66C-AE20-499D-90D3-D8D5B1645303 3 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:50CCADCC-F66A-49B2-8BAE-B12FE6229509 4 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:DD6E8DE5-3E20-4F9E-BC80-5FF92CE798F1 Abstract. Nine individuals of Apatidelia from Zhejiang Province, China were examined and their barcode sequences were generated and analyzed. A new species, A. morsei Xu & Sun sp. nov., is described and illustrated. The larva, male and female of A. acuminata Leng & Yang, 1998 and the male and female of A. morsei Xu & Sun sp. nov. are associated by mtCOI gene sequences. The male of A. acuminata Leng & Yang, 1998 is re-described and re-illustrated, and the female and the larva of the same species are also described and illustrated. Females and larvae of the genus are here reported for the first time.
    [Show full text]