DOCSLIB.ORG

October 2020 Serving the Mountain Empire Communities of Canelo, Elgin, Patagonia and Sonoita Vol

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
October 2020 Serving the Mountain Empire Communities of Canelo, Elgin, Patagonia and Sonoita Vol PATAGONIA REGIONAL TIMES OCTOBER 2020 SERVING THE MOUNTAIN EMPIRE COMMUNITIES OF CANELO, ELGIN, PATAGONIA AND SONOITA VOL. 10 ISSUE 8 PRT Hosts Candidate Forum Proposed Mine Route Raises Concerns By Marion Vendituoli Representatives from South32 gave a power- point presentation to residents of the Red Rock area on August 4 showing a proposed route that they are calling the Cross Creek Connector. This road would link Harshaw Road, just outside the Patagonia Town limits, to Route 82 at Cross Creek Road north of town De- spite South32 avoiding a By Aisha Sander Photo by Marion Vendituoli route through the town Bruce Bracker answers a question at the PRT’s Supervisor Candidate limits of Patagonia there is Forum, while Donna Federici and Justin Luna await their turn at the opposition to this project microphone from many residents in The PRT hosted a candidates forum Federici pointed out that there was no the eastern part of the for the District 3 County Supervisors public health board at the county lev- county. candidates: incumbent Bruce Bracker el. Federici said that one of the main South32 has purchased (D), Donna Federici (I), and Justin Luna flaws in the pandemic response was 15 parcels of contiguous (I). The forum was moderated by Tom not controlling what was happening at land on which to build Beal, retired journalist from the the US-Mexico border. Hilary Felix, c the new road, for a total Tucson Star and PRT Board member. Facebook commenter, wrote that, in of 366 acres, according When asked about South32’s Cross fact, Sonora closed the border before to a map constructed by Creek connector road proposal (read the U.S. did. Robert Gay. The company more on pages 1 & 4 of this issue) The candidates were asked how proposes to build three Map Courtesy of Robert Gay Bracker said that they are working they would reassure voters of the bridges along the connec- with the mining company to consid- integrity of the election. Bracker re- The properties in pink are land acquisitions by tor, across Sonoita Creek, South32 that provide a route for the Hermosa er another route and pushing use of sponded, “there will be five locations Harshaw Creek and at Red Project between Harshaw Rd and SR 82. electric vehicles. Federici said, while for early voting, or you can take your Rock Canyon. Ground clear- communities and neighbors along all of the county is limited in its legal capac- early ballot and turn it in at one of the ing would not begin until mid-2021, the potential routes was a key consid- ity to stop the road, it has a “right to centers. Ballot drop boxes are com- according to South32. eration.” demand air quality...disrupting rural ing from Sect. of State to be placed Ore trucks would proceed north on There is considerable opposition to neighborhoods is appalling.” Luna throughout the county. The vote will Hwy 82 to Sonoita, then north on Hwy this route, however. Ron Pulliam, of admitted that he did not know much be very secure, I’m very confident in 83 to the Port of Tucson. South32 ex- Borderlands Restoration and Wildlife about this particular route, adding that.” Federici said, “I wish I had as pects that the ore would then be sent Corridors, expressed “very substantial “I would deter the route, let’s find a much confidence. The entire mail in by rail to the port of Guymas in Mexico concerns.” “This proposal will put a more feasible route.” vote situation is very shaky. I don’t or to the ports on the West coast or major industrial road in the center of The candidates were asked what want to direct anything to our county. Gulf coast for shipping. an area with high biological diversity, three things they would do if the If anyone can do it, it would be us, a “The Cross Creek Connector option including up to 12 threatened and pandemic worsened in 2021. Bracker rural county. But to have absolute con- honors the community’s preference endangered species,” he said. An im- touted his leadership role in pressuring fidence in mail-in voting is...you can’t.” to keep the route outside the town of portant wildlife corridor stretches from Gov. Ducey to implement local mask Luna said, “Register for early voting Patagonia limits, avoids school traffic the Patagonia Mountains to the Santa ordinances and testing for the county. and drop it off it yourself...our county and pedestrian risks in Patagonia,” Ritas. Pulliam, who founded Wildlife Luna suggested that more should be manager...she’s doing a great job in wrote Melanie Lawson, communities Corridors, LLC, which has preserved done to help those suffering financially my opinion.” manager for South32. We have under- 1300 acres as open space on the west by providing assistance from the funds Watch the recording: patagoniare- taken extensive studies on the differ- the county received. Both Luna and gionaltimes.org/elections-2020. ent options available and impacts to See Road/ Page 4 Democracy is HarD Work By Jac Heiss, President of PRT Board The political ads we see on TV re- It’s not just about registering to inforce this notion. Rarely do they tell vote, then casting a ballot. It involves PRT From the time I was old enough to us much about a candidate’s political a litany of tasks like fact checking, MISSION STATEMENT vote, which was a few months before I views, but more often are focused researching information from multi- was sent to Vietnam, I have wondered attempts to create doubt about the ple sources, monitoring the actions To publish a nonprofit why almost half of all Americans integrity of their opponents. And then of those we have elected and holding community newspaper which choose not to exercise one of their we have social media which afford us them accountable, regardless of party serves the Mountain Empire most precious rights as citizens of this communities of Santa Cruz the opportunity to spew venom and affiliation. Indeed it is all hard work, country. In some parts of our nation, denigrate one another rather than inconvenient and time consuming, but County, including Canelo, Elgin, voter suppression is cited as a primary Patagonia, and Sonoita, and serve to identify problems and share contrast that with storming a beach at reason, but from my observations, which is open to all views, high- ideas as to how to address them. Even Normandy, raising a flag at Iwo Jima, lighting local issues and empha- making it more difficult for folks to the semantics that politicians use can or boarding enemy ships in the middle sizing the contributions of local register or to find a mail box or voting discourage civility. We’ve all heard of the night in the Straits of Hormuz to talent. booth appears to actually motivate statements like, “If you elect me to search for weapons and contraband them to participate, at least for a office, I’ll fight for….” as my own son recently had to do. WHO WE ARE few election cycles. Time constraints Fight? Seriously? Maybe debate Election outcomes at every level in- have historically been problematic for monitors should introduce the can- volve transferring power. What would We are a nonprofit organization, many people, but we are no longer didates with something like, “In this happen if we think of it as transferring funded by paid advertising, do- restricted in most parts of the country nations and grants. PRT is a free corner weighing 245 lbs…” No wonder RESPONSIBILITY? I think we would all to casting our ballots at a single voting cynicism abounds. prefer to vote for someone in pursuit monthly publication distributed to site, on a single day. news stands and local merchants When discussing this with a friend of responsibility than for someone Perhaps the most common reason in The Mountain Empire. of mine, he really caught my attention fighting for power. I hear from people is their sense that Managing Editor: with this simplistic yet abundantly It’s time for us to get to work. their vote doesn’t matter. “They’re all true statement. “Democracy is hard Marion Vendituoli corrupt, so why bother?” work.” Assistant Editor: Aisha Chapra Sander Important Early Voting Information Bookkeeper: Timeline for Voters Cynie Murray Oct. 5: Last day to register to vote. Register online at https:// Administrative Assistant servicearizona.com/VoterRegistration/ or register by phone. Ad Manager: Call 520-375-7924. Jared Krikorian Oct. 7: Early Ballots are mailed to the Permanent Early Voting Contributing Writers: List (PEVL) & absentee voters. Early in-person voting begins at the Bob Brandt Oct. 7 through Oct 30: Alison Bunting County Recorder’s Office. Mon to Fri, 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. For early Francesca Claverie Early Voting voting in person on Saturdays during October read information Lynn Davison Early Voting Sites under “Early Voting Sites” Jo Dean Oct. 23: Last day to request an early ballot. Complete online Cassina Farley form to request ballot: https://my.arizona.vote/Early/Applica- Robert Gay October 7 thru October 30, 2020 tionLogin.aspx Patra Kelly Santa Cruz County Recorder’s Office Sarah Klingenstein Locations of Early Ballot Drop Off Boxes* 2150 N. Congress Dr., Suite #101, Nogales Martin Levowitz Santa Cruz County Complex: 2150 N. Congress Dr., Pat McNamara 8:00a.m. – 5:00p.m. Nogales Harold Meckler Vince Pinto Saturday, October 10, 2020 Nogales Public Library: 518 N. Grand Ave., Nogales Laura Wenzel Santa Cruz County Recorder’s Office Patagonia Town Hall: 310 McKeown Ave., 2150 N. Congress Dr., Suite #1, Nogales Patagonia Board of Directors: 9:00a.m.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Arizona TIM PALMER FLICKR
    Arizona TIM PALMER FLICKR Colorado River at Mile 50. Cover: Salt River. Letter from the President ivers are the great treasury of noted scientists and other experts reviewed the survey design, and biological diversity in the western state-specific experts reviewed the results for each state. RUnited States. As evidence mounts The result is a state-by-state list of more than 250 of the West’s that climate is changing even faster than we outstanding streams, some protected, some still vulnerable. The feared, it becomes essential that we create Great Rivers of the West is a new type of inventory to serve the sanctuaries on our best, most natural rivers modern needs of river conservation—a list that Western Rivers that will harbor viable populations of at-risk Conservancy can use to strategically inform its work. species—not only charismatic species like salmon, but a broad range of aquatic and This is one of 11 state chapters in the report. Also available are a terrestrial species. summary of the entire report, as well as the full report text. That is what we do at Western Rivers Conservancy. We buy land With the right tools in hand, Western Rivers Conservancy is to create sanctuaries along the most outstanding rivers in the West seizing once-in-a-lifetime opportunities to acquire and protect – places where fish, wildlife and people can flourish. precious streamside lands on some of America’s finest rivers. With a talented team in place, combining more than 150 years This is a time when investment in conservation can yield huge of land acquisition experience and offices in Oregon, Colorado, dividends for the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Flows and Water Demands in Arizona
    Environmental Flows and Water A University of Arizona Water Resources Research Center Project Demands in Arizona ater is an increasingly scarce resource and is essential for Arizona’s future. Figure 1. Elements of Environmental Flow WWith Arizona’s population growth and Occurring in Seasonal Hydrographs continued drought, citizens and water managers have been taking a closer look at water supplies in the state. Municipal, industrial, and agricul- tural water users are well-represented demand sectors, but water supplies and management to benefit the environment are not often consid- ered. This bulletin explains environmental water demands in Arizona and introduces information essential for considering environmental water demands in water management discussions. Considering water for the environment is impor- tant because humans have an interconnected and interdependent relationship with the envi- ronment. Nature provides us recreation oppor- tunities, economic benefits, and water supplies Data Source: to sustain our communities. USGS stream gage data Figure 2: Human Demand and Current Flow in Arizona Environmental water demands (or environmental flow) (circle size indicates relative amount of water) refers to how much water is needed in a watercourse to sustain a healthy ecosystem. Defining environmental water demand goes beyond the ecology and hydrol- Maximum ogy of a system and should include consideration for Flows how much water is required to achieve an agreed Industrial 40.8 maf Industrial SW Municipal upon level of river health, as determined by the GW 1% GW 8% water-using community. Arizona’s native ani- 4% mals and plants depend upon dynamic flows commonly described according to the natural Municipal SW flow regime.
    [Show full text]
  • Gila Topminnow Revised Recovery Plan December 1998
    GILA TOPMINNOW, Poeciliopsis occidentalis occidentalis, REVISED RECOVERY PLAN (Original Approval: March 15, 1984) Prepared by David A. Weedman Arizona Game and Fish Department Phoenix, Arizona for Region 2 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Albuquerque, New Mexico December 1998 Approved: Regional Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Date: Gila Topminnow Revised Recovery Plan December 1998 DISCLAIMER Recovery plans delineate reasonable actions required to recover and protect the species. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) prepares the plans, sometimes with the assistance of recovery teams, contractors, State and Federal Agencies, and others. Objectives are attained and any necessary funds made available subject to budgetary and other constraints affecting the parties involved, as well as the need to address other priorities. Time and costs provided for individual tasks are estimates only, and not to be taken as actual or budgeted expenditures. Recovery plans do not necessarily represent the views nor official positions or approval of any persons or agencies involved in the plan formulation, other than the Service. They represent the official position of the Service only after they have been signed by the Regional Director or Director as approved. Approved recovery plans are subject to modification as dictated by new findings, changes in species status, and the completion of recovery tasks. ii Gila Topminnow Revised Recovery Plan December 1998 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Original preparation of the revised Gila topminnow Recovery Plan (1994) was done by Francisco J. Abarca 1, Brian E. Bagley, Dean A. Hendrickson 1 and Jeffrey R. Simms 1. That document was modified to this current version and the work conducted by those individuals is greatly appreciated and now acknowledged.
    [Show full text]
  • June 2021 Arizona Office of Tourism Monthly State Parks Visitation Report
    June 2021 Arizona Office of Tourism Monthly State Parks Visitation Report Arizona State Park Visitation June June 2021 2020 YTD State Park % Chg 2021 2020 YTD YTD % Chg Alamo Lake SP 1,237 1,924 -35.7% 48,720 46,871 3.9% Buckskin Mountain SP 11,092 9,292 19.4% 49,439 45,627 8.4% Catalina SP 6,598 2,420 172.6% 154,763 156,234 -0.9% Cattail Cove SP 10,138 14,908 -32.0% 52,221 67,256 -22.4% Colorado River SHP 167 57 193.0% 2,589 6,220 -58.4% Dead Horse Ranch SP 17,142 18,748 -8.6% 126,799 120,044 5.6% Fool Hollow Lake RA 16,380 25,104 -34.8% 55,360 63,341 -12.6% Fort Verde SHP 706 521 35.5% 4,672 2,654 76.0% Granite Mountain Hotshots MSP 1,076 1,380 -22.0% 11,778 14,874 -20.8% Homolovi SP 4,032 1,982 103.4% 22,007 11,470 91.9% Jerome SHP 4,099 1,991 105.9% 21,789 14,109 54.4% Kartchner Caverns SP 7,776 2,045 280.2% 44,020 57,663 -23.7% Lake Havasu SP 66,040 74,493 -11.3% 241,845 337,920 -28.4% Lost Dutchman SP 4,198 3,651 15.0% 122,844 132,399 -7.2% Lyman Lake SP 11,169 10,625 5.1% 30,755 38,074 -19.2% McFarland SHP 166 0 1,213 2,942 -58.8% Oracle SP 270 486 -44.4% 6,994 9,191 -23.9% Patagonia Lake SP 25,058 30,706 -18.4% 118,311 126,873 -6.7% Picacho Peak SP 1,893 1,953 -3.1% 64,084 68,800 -6.9% Red Rock SP 12,963 6,118 111.9% 56,356 33,228 69.6% Riordan Mansion SHP 777 0 2,188 2,478 -11.7% River Island SP 2,623 3,004 -12.7% 18,089 19,411 -6.8% Roper Lake SP 8,049 12,394 -35.1% 52,924 49,738 6.4% Slide Rock SP 54,922 33,491 64.0% 231,551 110,781 109.0% Tombstone Courthouse SHP 2,875 1,465 96.2% 18,261 16,394 11.4% Tonto Natural Bridge SP 8,146 7,161 13.8% 54,950 36,557 50.3% Tubac Presidio SHP 261 117 123.1% 4,240 2,923 45.1% Yuma Territorial Prison SHP 2,206 1,061 107.9% 28,672 26,505 8.2% Total All Parks 282,059 267,097 5.6% 1,647,434 1,620,577 1.7% Note: Dankworth Pond SP data is included in Roper Lake SP, Sonoita Creek SNA is included in Patagonia Lake SP and Verde River Greenway SNA is included in Dead Horse Ranch SP.
    [Show full text]
  • The Arizona Nature Conservancy Conservancy 300 East University Boulevard, Suite 230, Tucson, Arizona 85705 (602) 622-3861
    The Nature The Arizona Nature Conservancy conservancy 300 East University Boulevard, Suite 230, Tucson, Arizona 85705 (602) 622-3861 Memorandum To: Dan Campbell From: Peter Warren Re: Arizona native fishes Date: 26 August 1987 Here is some general information about the status oi native fish in Arizona and the Arizona Nature Conservancy's role in protecting threatened native fish. The pre-settlement fish fauna of Arizona consisted of 31 species of freshwater fish. Through introduction of exotic species, the number of resident fish in Arizona is now over 100 species. Many of the exotic species are either predatory upon or in competition with native species. A combination of introduced exotic species and loss of perennial stream habitat has sharply reduced the number and size of native fish populations. Of the 31 original native fish, one is extinct and four are extirpated in Arizona. Approximately half of the remaining native fish are currently listed or proposed for listing as Threatened or Endangered. Although recovery measures are being undertaken, the future of several of the endangered fish is by no means secure. For example, Woundfin survives only in a small part of the Virgin River and its small population could be easily destroyed. Major losses of native fish populations continue to occur. We have Just learned that all of the Mexican populations of Desert Pupfish in the Colorado River delta were apparently destroyed during the last three years due to introduction of Tilapia into the populations by floodwaters of 1983. The single most important factor in protecting the remaining native fish populations is preservation of habitat and insuring stable stream flows.
    [Show full text]
  • March 2021 Volume 22, Issue 1 EMPIRE RANCH FOUNDATION NEWS
    March 2021 Volume 22, Issue 1 EMPIRE RANCH FOUNDATION NEWS P.O Box 842 * Sonoita, Arizona 85637-0842 * (888) 364-2829 www.empireranchfoundation.org Ranch in 1876 and had begun the de- Thanks! Edward Vail Stories velopment of the Total Wreck silver The response to our year-end appeal to mine. help the Foundation renovate the New Upon his arrival in Arizona Ned Ranch House was fantastic! Over $8,000 became the assayer of the Total Wreck has been added to the renovation fund. Mine and later purchased and managed We also received our first four-year the Rosemont Ranch on the east slope pledge. Please consider making a pledge of the Santa Rita Mountains. He partic- for this exciting project. Email ipated actively in Vail family ranching [email protected] or operations in Arizona and California call 888-364-2829. throughout his life. A lifelong bachelor, COVID19 still limits our ability to Edward “Ned” Vail, beside his car on the he was fondly known by his nieces and host events, volunteer workdays, and Empire Ranch, ca 1920 (photo: M. V. nephews as “Tio.” He died at the age of docent tours. The Ranch House remains Woolley) 87 on October 14, 1936 in Tucson. open to visitors. When circumstances Edward “Ned” L. Vail was born Sep- In the 1920s Ned began to write permit, we hope to institute a greeter tember 19, 1849 in Liverpool, Nova reminiscences of his experiences in ear- program. Trained volunteers would be Scotia, Canada, the eldest son of ly Arizona, many of which were pub- stationed outdoors on weekends to an- Mahlon and Elizabeth Boyle Vail.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Fish Restoration in Redrock Canyon
    U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Final Environmental Assessment Phoenix Area Office NATIVE FISH RESTORATION IN REDROCK CANYON U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Southwestern Region Coronado National Forest Santa Cruz County, Arizona June 2008 Bureau of Reclamation Finding of No Significant Impact U.S. Forest Service Finding of No Significant Impact Decision Notice INTRODUCTION In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (Public Law 91-190, as amended), the Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation), as the lead Federal agency, and the Forest Service, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), and Arizona Game and Fish Department (AGFD), as cooperating agencies, have issued the attached final environmental assessment (EA) to disclose the potential environmental impacts resulting from construction of a fish barrier, removal of nonnative fishes with the piscicide antimycin A and/or rotenone, and restoration of native fishes and amphibians in Redrock Canyon on the Coronado National Forest (CNF). The Proposed Action is intended to improve the recovery status of federally listed fish and amphibians (Gila chub, Gila topminnow, Chiricahua leopard frog, and Sonora tiger salamander) and maintain a healthy native fishery in Redrock Canyon consistent with the CNF Plan and ongoing Endangered Species Act (ESA), Section 7(a)(2), consultation between Reclamation and the FWS. BACKGROUND The Proposed Action is part of a larger program being implemented by Reclamation to construct a series of fish barriers within the Gila River Basin to prevent the invasion of nonnative fishes into high-priority streams occupied by imperiled native fishes. This program is mandated by a FWS biological opinion on impacts of Central Arizona Project (CAP) water transfers to the Gila River Basin (FWS 2008a).
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix a Assessment Units
    APPENDIX A ASSESSMENT UNITS SURFACE WATER REACH DESCRIPTION REACH/LAKE NUM WATERSHED Agua Fria River 341853.9 / 1120358.6 - 341804.8 / 15070102-023 Middle Gila 1120319.2 Agua Fria River State Route 169 - Yarber Wash 15070102-031B Middle Gila Alamo 15030204-0040A Bill Williams Alum Gulch Headwaters - 312820/1104351 15050301-561A Santa Cruz Alum Gulch 312820 / 1104351 - 312917 / 1104425 15050301-561B Santa Cruz Alum Gulch 312917 / 1104425 - Sonoita Creek 15050301-561C Santa Cruz Alvord Park Lake 15060106B-0050 Middle Gila American Gulch Headwaters - No. Gila Co. WWTP 15060203-448A Verde River American Gulch No. Gila County WWTP - East Verde River 15060203-448B Verde River Apache Lake 15060106A-0070 Salt River Aravaipa Creek Aravaipa Cyn Wilderness - San Pedro River 15050203-004C San Pedro Aravaipa Creek Stowe Gulch - end Aravaipa C 15050203-004B San Pedro Arivaca Cienega 15050304-0001 Santa Cruz Arivaca Creek Headwaters - Puertocito/Alta Wash 15050304-008 Santa Cruz Arivaca Lake 15050304-0080 Santa Cruz Arnett Creek Headwaters - Queen Creek 15050100-1818 Middle Gila Arrastra Creek Headwaters - Turkey Creek 15070102-848 Middle Gila Ashurst Lake 15020015-0090 Little Colorado Aspen Creek Headwaters - Granite Creek 15060202-769 Verde River Babbit Spring Wash Headwaters - Upper Lake Mary 15020015-210 Little Colorado Babocomari River Banning Creek - San Pedro River 15050202-004 San Pedro Bannon Creek Headwaters - Granite Creek 15060202-774 Verde River Barbershop Canyon Creek Headwaters - East Clear Creek 15020008-537 Little Colorado Bartlett Lake 15060203-0110 Verde River Bear Canyon Lake 15020008-0130 Little Colorado Bear Creek Headwaters - Turkey Creek 15070102-046 Middle Gila Bear Wallow Creek N. and S. Forks Bear Wallow - Indian Res.
    [Show full text]
  • Flood Insurance Study Vol. 1
    SANTA CRUZ COUNTY, ARIZONA AND INCORPORATED AREAS VOLUME 1 OF 3 Community Community Name Number SANTA CRUZ COUNTY, (UNINCORPORATED AREAS) 040090 NOGALES, CITY OF 040091 PATAGONIA, TOWN OF 040092 Santa Cruz County EFFECTIVE: DECEMBER 2, 2011 Federal Emergency Management Agency FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 04023CV001A NOTICE TO FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY USERS Communities participating in the National Flood Insurance Program have established repositories of flood hazard data for floodplain management and flood insurance purposes. This Flood Insurance Study (FIS) may not contain all data available within the repository. Please contact the Community Map Repository for any additional data. Part or all of this FIS may be revised and republished at any time. In addition, part of this FIS report may be revised by the Letter of Map Revision process, which does not involve republication or redistribution of the FIS report. It is, therefore, the responsibility of the user to consult with community officials and to check the community repository to obtain the most current FIS report components. Selected Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) panels for this community contain information that was previously shown separately on the corresponding Flood Boundary and Floodway Map (FBFM) panels (e.g., floodways, cross sections). In addition, former flood hazard zone designations have been changed as follows: Old Zone(s) New Zone A1 through A30 AE B X C X Initial Countywide FIS Report Effective Date: December 2, 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS – VOLUME 1 Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION
    [Show full text]
  • The EMPIRE RANCH HOUSE a Brief History
    to his sister in London, England, Hislop described the house as having The EMPIRE RANCH HOUSE “two bedrooms, kitchen, and a storeroom.” At the back of the house was a corral for holding the cattle and protecting stock from thieves and preda- A Brief History tors at night. The breezeway between the rooms, sometimes referred to by the Spanish term “zaguan,” provided the only entry into the corral. Beams Aug. 2013 Rev. and latillas used in constructing the original, flat roof are still visible from the inside of the breezeway. Hislop’s letter also said that the house had no windows or doors, meaning that there were only window and door open- ings, no furnishing, and that “plaster was needed.” The two men installed window panes, doors and a wooden floor themselves. Although Vail had acquired some carpentering skills while working in the Nevada goldfields, neither of the men was experienced in working with adobe mud or plaster. To accomplish this task they hired two Native American adobe masons. In 1881 Vail returned to New Jersey to marry his longtime sweetheart, Mar- garet Newhall, and bring her back to the Empire Ranch. As a wedding present to his bride, Vail had a half-hexagon bay window built into the north wall of the living room. Rooms were added to the house to accommodate a grow- ing staff and the family that Vail and Margaret planned to raise. Empire Ranch Vaqueros circa 1890 In the late 1870’s, a rear addition of rooms for offices and staff were added, Photo Courtesy Laura (“Dusty”) Vail Ingram and a gable-roofed Victorian addition followed.
    [Show full text]
  • Feasibility Study for the SANTA CRUZ VALLEY NATIONAL HERITAGE AREA
    Feasibility Study for the SANTA CRUZ VALLEY NATIONAL HERITAGE AREA FINAL Prepared by the Center for Desert Archaeology April 2005 CREDITS Assembled and edited by: Jonathan Mabry, Center for Desert Archaeology Contributions by (in alphabetical order): Linnea Caproni, Preservation Studies Program, University of Arizona William Doelle, Center for Desert Archaeology Anne Goldberg, Department of Anthropology, University of Arizona Andrew Gorski, Preservation Studies Program, University of Arizona Kendall Kroesen, Tucson Audubon Society Larry Marshall, Environmental Education Exchange Linda Mayro, Pima County Cultural Resources Office Bill Robinson, Center for Desert Archaeology Carl Russell, CBV Group J. Homer Thiel, Desert Archaeology, Inc. Photographs contributed by: Adriel Heisey Bob Sharp Gordon Simmons Tucson Citizen Newspaper Tumacácori National Historical Park Maps created by: Catherine Gilman, Desert Archaeology, Inc. Brett Hill, Center for Desert Archaeology James Holmlund, Western Mapping Company Resource information provided by: Arizona Game and Fish Department Center for Desert Archaeology Metropolitan Tucson Convention and Visitors Bureau Pima County Staff Pimería Alta Historical Society Preservation Studies Program, University of Arizona Sky Island Alliance Sonoran Desert Network The Arizona Nature Conservancy Tucson Audubon Society Water Resources Research Center, University of Arizona PREFACE The proposed Santa Cruz Valley National Heritage Area is a big land filled with small details. One’s first impression may be of size and distance—broad valleys rimmed by mountain ranges, with a huge sky arching over all. However, a closer look reveals that, beneath the broad brush strokes, this is a land of astonishing variety. For example, it is comprised of several kinds of desert, year-round flowing streams, and sky island mountain ranges.
    [Show full text]
  • Growing up a Tomboy on the Empire Ranch, Part I
    Growing up a tomboy on the Empire Ranch, Part I By Betty Barr This article was originally printed in The Bulletin in two parts, July 18 and 23, 2003. It is posted on the Empire Ranch Foundation website with Betty Barr’s permission. This material is copyrighted and may not be further reproduced without permission of the author. It was a windy day in early December 1914, and several murderers had been spotted near the Empire Ranch in Sonoita. The young rancher, Banning Vail, along with a group of deputies, had set out on the manhunt when word was received that Vail’s first child was about to be born in Tucson. Leaving the posse, he hurried to town to welcome his daughter into the world. Vail laughingly observed that the baby must be thirsty, she was bawling so loudly she sounded “dusty.” The nickname stuck, and as Dusty Vail often remarked, the name suited her a lot better than the ladylike, Laura, that she was christened with. It was later learned that the man who replaced Vail on the posse was killed and the family always credited Dusty with saving her father’s life. Growing up on a ranch in the early twentieth century was an exciting adventure for Dusty Vail Ingram, a little girl who idolized her dad and loved horses. The fearless tomboy was up on a horse at age six. One day when no one was around she lugged her saddle up on the fence, then dropped it down on the horse and hopped aboard. All went smoothly until she returned from the ride and leaned down to unlatch the gate.
    [Show full text]