Arquivos De Zoologia

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Arquivos De Zoologia ISSN 0066-7870 Arquivos de Zoologia COMPARATIVE MORPHOLOGICAL STUDY OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE THREE FAMILIES OF STROMBOIDEA AND THE XENOPHOROIDEA (MOLLUSCA, CAENOGASTROPODA), WITH AN ASSESSMENT OF THEIR PHYLOGENY Luiz Ricardo L. Simone VOLUME 37, FASCÍCULO 2 MUSEU DE ZOOLOGIA DA UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO SÃO PAULO, 2005 UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO MUSEU DE ZOOLOGIA Prof. Dr. Adolpho José Melfi Prof. Dr. Carlos Roberto Ferreira Brandão Reitor Diretor Prof. Dr. Hélio Nogueira da Cruz Profª. Drª. Eliana Marques Cancello Vice-Reitor Vice-Diretora Prof. Dr. Adilson Avansi de Abreu Pró-Reitor de Cultura e Extensão Universitária COMISSÃO EDITORIAL Hussam El Dine Zaher (editor) EDITORES ASSOCIADOS Antonio Carlos Marques (Universidade de São Paulo) Mário de Pinna (Universidade de São Paulo) Sérgio Antonio Vanin (Universidade de São Paulo) SEÇÃO DE PUBLICAÇÕES Airton de Almeida Cruz (arte-finalista) Marly dos Reis (bibliotecária) NORMALIZAÇÃO BIBLIOGRÁFICA Teresa Beatriz Nunes Guimarães (bibliotecária) Maria Regina de Mendonça Ferreira (bibliotecária) MUSEU DE ZOOLOGIA DA UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO Av. Nazaré, 481, Ipiranga, CEP 04263-000, São Paulo, SP, Brasil Publicado com o apoio financeiro da Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP), Programa de Apoio às Publicações Científicas Periódicas da USP (Comissão de Credenciamento) e Museu de Zoologia da Universidade de São Paulo (MZUSP). Arquivos de Zoologia. v.15- 1967- Museu de Zoologia da Universidade de São Paulo. v. ilust. ISSN 0066-7870 Continuação de: Arquivos de Zoologia do Estado de São Paulo, v.1-14; 1960-66. 1. Zoologia. I. Museu de Zoologia, USP. As instruções aos autores são publicadas em inglês e português no fascículo introdutório de cada volume, assim como a lista dos consultores que assessoram a Comissão Editorial. Arquivos de Zoologia MUSEU DE ZOOLOGIA DA UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO CONTEÚDO LUIZ RICARDO L. SIMONE COMPARATIVE MORPHOLOGICAL STUDY OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE THREE FAMILIES OF STROMBOIDEA AND THE XENOPHOROIDEA (MOLLUSCA, CAENOGASTROPODA), WITH AN ASSESSMENT OF THEIR PHYLOGENY ................................ 141 ISSN 0066-7870 Arq. Zool., S. Paulo São Paulo v. 37 n. 2 p. 141-267 2005 Contents Abstract ............................................................................................................................................... 141 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................ 142 Material and Methods ......................................................................................................................... 142 Systematics.................................................................................................................................... 155 Family STROMBIDAE ........................................................................................................... 155 Genus Strombus Linné, 1758............................................................................................. 155 Strombus pugilis Linné, 1758 ...................................................................................... 155 Strombus alatus Gmelin, 1790 ..................................................................................... 164 Strombus gracilior Sowerby, 1825 ............................................................................... 169 Genus Eustrombus Wenz, 1940 ......................................................................................... 170 Eustrombus goliath (Schröter, 1805) new comb. ......................................................... 170 Eustrombus gigas (Linné, 1758) .................................................................................. 178 Genus Aliger Thiele, 1929 ................................................................................................. 181 Aliger costatus (Gmelin, 1791) new comb................................................................... 181 Aliger gallus (Linné, 1758) .......................................................................................... 185 Genus Tricornis Jousseaume, 1886 ................................................................................... 189 Tricornis raninus (Gmelin, 1791) ................................................................................. 189 Genus Conomurex P. Fisher, 1884..................................................................................... 192 Conomurex luhuanus Linné, 1758 ............................................................................... 192 Genus Canarium Schumacher, 1817 .................................................................................. 196 Canarium urceus Linné, 1758 ...................................................................................... 196 Genus Lambis Röding, 1798 ............................................................................................. 199 Lambis lambis (Linné, 1758) ....................................................................................... 199 Genus Terebellum Röding, 1798 ....................................................................................... 203 Terebellum terebellum (Linné, 1758) .......................................................................... 203 Genus Tibia Röding, 1798 ................................................................................................. 207 Tibia insulaechorab Röding, 1798 ............................................................................... 207 Family STRUTHIOLARIIDAE .............................................................................................. 209 Genus Tylospira Harris, 1897 ............................................................................................ 209 Tylospira scutulata (Gmelin, 1791) .............................................................................. 209 Genus Struthiolaria Lamarck, 1816 ................................................................................... 215 Struthiolaria papulosa (Martyn, 1784) ......................................................................... 215 Family APORRHAIDAE ........................................................................................................ 217 Genus Cuphosolenus Piette, 1876 ..................................................................................... 217 Cuphosolenus (?) serresianus (Michaud, 1828) new comb. ........................................ 217 Genus Aporrhais DaCosta, 1778 ....................................................................................... 222 Aporrhais occidentalis Beck, 1836 .............................................................................. 222 Aporrhais pespelicani (Linné, 1758)............................................................................ 228 Family XENOPHORIDAE ..................................................................................................... 231 Genus Onustus Swainson, 1840 ......................................................................................... 231 Onustus caribaeus (Petit de la Saussaye, 1856) ........................................................... 231 Onustus indicus (Gmelin, 1971) .................................................................................. 238 Genus Xenophora Waldeheim, 1807 ................................................................................. 240 Xenophora conchyliophora (Born, 1780) .................................................................... 240 Discussion of Characters .................................................................................................................... 247 Shell......................................................................................................................................... 247 Head-foot................................................................................................................................. 248 Operculum ............................................................................................................................... 251 Mantle organs .......................................................................................................................... 252 Kidney ..................................................................................................................................... 254 Digestive system ...................................................................................................................... 255 Buccal mass and odontophore ................................................................................................. 255 Radula ..................................................................................................................................... 256 Salivary glands ........................................................................................................................ 256 Esophagus................................................................................................................................ 257 Stomach ................................................................................................................................... 257 Intestine ................................................................................................................................... 258 Male genital system ................................................................................................................. 258 Female genital
Recommended publications
  • (Gastropoda: Littorinidae) in the Temperate Southern Hemisphere: the Genera Nodilittorina, Austrolittorina and Afrolittorina
    © Copyright Australian Museum, 2004 Records of the Australian Museum (2004) Vol. 56: 75–122. ISSN 0067-1975 The Subfamily Littorininae (Gastropoda: Littorinidae) in the Temperate Southern Hemisphere: The Genera Nodilittorina, Austrolittorina and Afrolittorina DAVID G. REID* AND SUZANNE T. WILLIAMS Department of Zoology, The Natural History Museum, London SW7 5BD, United Kingdom [email protected] · [email protected] ABSTRACT. The littorinine gastropods of the temperate southern continents were formerly classified together with tropical species in the large genus Nodilittorina. Recently, molecular data have shown that they belong in three distinct genera, Austrolittorina, Afrolittorina and Nodilittorina, whereas the tropical species are members of a fourth genus, Echinolittorina. Austrolittorina contains 5 species: A. unifasciata in Australia, A. antipodum and A. cincta in New Zealand, and A. fernandezensis and A. araucana in western South America. Afrolittorina contains 4 species: A. africana and A. knysnaensis in southern Africa, and A. praetermissa and A. acutispira in Australia. Nodilittorina is monotypic, containing only the Australian N. pyramidalis. This paper presents the first detailed morphological descriptions of the African and Australasian species of these three southern genera (the eastern Pacific species have been described elsewhere). The species-level taxonomy of several of these has been confused in the past; Afrolittorina africana and A. knysnaensis are here distinguished as separate taxa; Austrolittorina antipodum is a distinct species and not a subspecies of A. unifasciata; Nodilittorina pyramidalis is separated from the tropical Echinolittorina trochoides with similar shell characters. In addition to descriptions of shells, radulae and reproductive anatomy, distribution maps are given, and the ecological literature reviewed.
    [Show full text]
  • Environment for Development Improving Utilization of the Queen
    Environment for Development Discussion Paper Series December 2020 ◼ EfD DP 20-39 Improving Utilization of the Queen Conch (Aliger Gigas) Resource in the Colombian Caribbean A Bioeconomic Model of Rotational Harvesting Jorge Marco, Diego Valderrama, Mario Rueda, and Maykol R o dr i g ue z - P r i et o Discussion papers are research materials circulated by their authors for purposes of information and discussion. They have not necessarily undergone formal peer review. Central America Chile China Research Program in Economics and Research Nucleus on Environmental and Environmental Economics Program in China Environment for Development in Central Natural Resource Economics (NENRE) (EEPC) America Tropical Agricultural Research and Universidad de Concepción Peking University Higher Education Center (CATIE) Colombia Ghana The Research Group on Environmental, Ethiopia The Environment and Natural Resource Natural Resource and Applied Economics Environment and Climate Research Center Research Unit, Institute of Statistical, Social Studies (REES-CEDE), Universidad de los (ECRC), Policy Studies Institute, Addis and Economic Research, University of Andes, Colombia Ababa, Ethiopia Ghana, Accra India Kenya Nigeria Centre for Research on the Economics of School of Economics Resource and Environmental Policy Climate, Food, Energy, and Environment, University of Nairobi Research Centre, University of Nigeria, (CECFEE), at Indian Statistical Institute, Nsukka New Delhi, India South Africa Tanzania Sweden Environmental Economics Policy Research Environment
    [Show full text]
  • Crepidula Fornicata
    NOBANIS - Marine invasive species in Nordic waters - Fact Sheet Crepidula fornicata Author of this species fact sheet: Kathe R. Jensen, Zoological Museum, Natural History Museum of Denmark, Universiteteparken 15, 2100 København Ø, Denmark. Phone: +45 353-21083, E-mail: [email protected] Bibliographical reference – how to cite this fact sheet: Jensen, Kathe R. (2010): NOBANIS – Invasive Alien Species Fact Sheet – Crepidula fornicata – From: Identification key to marine invasive species in Nordic waters – NOBANIS www.nobanis.org, Date of access x/x/201x. Species description Species name Crepidula fornicata, Linnaeus, 1758 – Slipper limpet Synonyms Patella fornicata Linnaeus, 1758; Crepidula densata Conrad, 1871; Crepidula virginica Conrad, 1871; Crepidula maculata Rigacci, 1866; Crepidula mexicana Rigacci, 1866; Crepidula violacea Rigacci, 1866; Crepidula roseae Petuch, 1991; Crypta nautarum Mörch, 1877; Crepidula nautiloides auct. NON Lesson, 1834 (ISSG Database; Minchin, 2008). Common names Tøffelsnegl (DK, NO), Slipper limpet, American slipper limpet, Common slipper snail (UK, USA), Østerspest (NO), Ostronpest (SE), Amerikanische Pantoffelschnecke (DE), La crépidule (FR), Muiltje (NL), Seba (E). Identification Crepidula fornicata usually sit in stacks on a hard substrate, e.g., a shell of other molluscs, boulders or rocky outcroppings. Up to 13 animals have been reported in one stack, but usually 4-6 animals are seen in a stack. Individual shells are up to about 60 mm in length, cap-shaped, distinctly longer than wide. The “spire” is almost invisible, slightly skewed to the right posterior end of the shell. Shell height is highly variable. Inside the body whorl is a characteristic calcareous shell-plate (septum) behind which the visceral mass is protected.
    [Show full text]
  • Shell Classification – Using Family Plates
    Shell Classification USING FAMILY PLATES YEAR SEVEN STUDENTS Introduction In the following activity you and your class can use the same techniques as Queensland Museum The Queensland Museum Network has about scientists to classify organisms. 2.5 million biological specimens, and these items form the Biodiversity collections. Most specimens are from Activity: Identifying Queensland shells by family. Queensland’s terrestrial and marine provinces, but These 20 plates show common Queensland shells some are from adjacent Indo-Pacific regions. A smaller from 38 different families, and can be used for a range number of exotic species have also been acquired for of activities both in and outside the classroom. comparative purposes. The collection steadily grows Possible uses of this resource include: as our inventory of the region’s natural resources becomes more comprehensive. • students finding shells and identifying what family they belong to This collection helps scientists: • students determining what features shells in each • identify and name species family share • understand biodiversity in Australia and around • students comparing families to see how they differ. the world All shells shown on the following plates are from the • study evolution, connectivity and dispersal Queensland Museum Biodiversity Collection. throughout the Indo-Pacific • keep track of invasive and exotic species. Many of the scientists who work at the Museum specialise in taxonomy, the science of describing and naming species. In fact, Queensland Museum scientists
    [Show full text]
  • THE EXTENT of CORAL, SHELL, and ALGAL G in GUAM WATERS • R St)Ven E
    THE EXTENT OF CORAL, SHELL, AND ALGAL G IN GUAM WATERS • r St)ven E. Hedlund Sea Grant Publication UGSG-77-10 UNIVERSITY OF GUAM MARINE LABORATORY Technical Report No. 37 July 1977 This publication was printed under the auspices of the University of Guam Sea Grant Program (Grant No. 04-5-158-45) through an award from the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration, Office of Sea Grant Programs, Department of Commerce. Cover illustration: Pocillopora elegans, Lambis lambis, Caulerpa racemosa; drawn by Leonor Lange-Moore. • THE EXTENT OF CORAL, SHELL, AND ALGAL HARVESTING IN GUAM WATERS By Steven E. Hedlund Prepared For The Coastal Zone Management Section of the Bureau of Planning University of Guam Marine Laboratory Technical Report No. 37 July 1977 Sea Grant Publication UGSG-77-l0 • TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 Scope of Work 1 METHODS 2 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 2 Corals 2 Shells 7 Algae 12 Legislation 15 Corals 15 Shells 17 Algae 18 RECOMMENDATIONS 19 Corals 19 Shells 19 Algae 19 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 20 BIBLIOGRAPHY 21 PLATES 22 APPENDIX 27 Public Law 12-168 (Corals) 28 Regulation No. 28 (Trochus Shells) 33 INTRODUCTION The single most important natural resource of a tropical Pacific island is its coral reef. for without the reef there would be no island. The coral reef acts as a barrier to reduce the force of wave action upon the land. In addition. the reef provides a natural habitat for a variety of plant and animal life which interact with the environment to form the most complex ecosystem in our world today. The people of Guam utilize the reef for recreational purposes as well as a source of food.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of the the COVID-19 Pandemic on a Queen Conch (Aliger Gigas) Fishery in the Bahamas
    Impact of the the COVID-19 pandemic on a queen conch (Aliger gigas) fishery in The Bahamas Nicholas D. Higgs Cape Eleuthera Institute, Rock Sound, Eleuthera, Bahamas ABSTRACT The onset of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic in early 2020 led to a dramatic rise in unemployment and fears about food-security throughout the Caribbean region. Subsistence fisheries were one of the few activities permitted during emergency lockdown in The Bahamas, leading many to turn to the sea for food. Detailed monitoring of a small-scale subsistence fishery for queen conch was undertaken during the implementation of coronavirus emergency control measures over a period of twelve weeks. Weekly landings data showed a surge in fishing during the first three weeks where landings were 3.4 times higher than subsequent weeks. Overall 90% of the catch was below the minimum legal-size threshold and individual yield declined by 22% during the lockdown period. This study highlights the role of small-scale fisheries as a `natural insurance' against socio-economic shocks and a source of resilience for small island communities at times of crisis. It also underscores the risks to food security and long- term sustainability of fishery stocks posed by overexploitation of natural resources. Subjects Aquaculture, Fisheries and Fish Science, Conservation Biology, Marine Biology, Coupled Natural and Human Systems, Natural Resource Management Keywords Fisheries, Coronavirus, COVID-19, IUU, SIDS, SDG14, Food security, Caribbean, Resiliance, Small-scale fisheries Submitted 2 December 2020 INTRODUCTION Accepted 16 July 2021 Published 3 August 2021 Subsistence fishing has played an integral role in sustaining island communities for Corresponding author thousands of years, especially small islands with limited terrestrial resources (Keegan et Nicholas D.
    [Show full text]
  • Table S1.Xlsx
    Bone type Bone type Taxonomy Order/series Family Valid binomial Outdated binomial Notes Reference(s) (skeletal bone) (scales) Actinopterygii Incertae sedis Incertae sedis Incertae sedis †Birgeria stensioei cellular this study †Birgeria groenlandica cellular Ørvig, 1978 †Eurynotus crenatus cellular Goodrich, 1907; Schultze, 2016 †Mimipiscis toombsi †Mimia toombsi cellular Richter & Smith, 1995 †Moythomasia sp. cellular cellular Sire et al., 2009; Schultze, 2016 †Cheirolepidiformes †Cheirolepididae †Cheirolepis canadensis cellular cellular Goodrich, 1907; Sire et al., 2009; Zylberberg et al., 2016; Meunier et al. 2018a; this study Cladistia Polypteriformes Polypteridae †Bawitius sp. cellular Meunier et al., 2016 †Dajetella sudamericana cellular cellular Gayet & Meunier, 1992 Erpetoichthys calabaricus Calamoichthys sp. cellular Moss, 1961a; this study †Pollia suarezi cellular cellular Meunier & Gayet, 1996 Polypterus bichir cellular cellular Kölliker, 1859; Stéphan, 1900; Goodrich, 1907; Ørvig, 1978 Polypterus delhezi cellular this study Polypterus ornatipinnis cellular Totland et al., 2011 Polypterus senegalus cellular Sire et al., 2009 Polypterus sp. cellular Moss, 1961a †Scanilepis sp. cellular Sire et al., 2009 †Scanilepis dubia cellular cellular Ørvig, 1978 †Saurichthyiformes †Saurichthyidae †Saurichthys sp. cellular Scheyer et al., 2014 Chondrostei †Chondrosteiformes †Chondrosteidae †Chondrosteus acipenseroides cellular this study Acipenseriformes Acipenseridae Acipenser baerii cellular Leprévost et al., 2017 Acipenser gueldenstaedtii
    [Show full text]
  • The American Slipper Limpet Crepidula Fornicata (L.) in the Northern Wadden Sea 70 Years After Its Introduction
    Helgol Mar Res (2003) 57:27–33 DOI 10.1007/s10152-002-0119-x ORIGINAL ARTICLE D. W. Thieltges · M. Strasser · K. Reise The American slipper limpet Crepidula fornicata (L.) in the northern Wadden Sea 70 years after its introduction Received: 14 December 2001 / Accepted: 15 August 2001 / Published online: 25 September 2002 © Springer-Verlag and AWI 2002 Abstract In 1934 the American slipper limpet 1997). In the centre of its European distributional range Crepidula fornicata (L.) was first recorded in the north- a population explosion has been observed on the Atlantic ern Wadden Sea in the Sylt-Rømø basin, presumably im- coast of France, southern England and the southern ported with Dutch oysters in the preceding years. The Netherlands. This is well documented (reviewed by present account is the first investigation of the Crepidula Blanchard 1997) and sparked a variety of studies on the population since its early spread on the former oyster ecological and economic impacts of Crepidula. The eco- beds was studied in 1948. A field survey in 2000 re- logical impacts of Crepidula are manifold, and include vealed the greatest abundance of Crepidula in the inter- the following: tidal/subtidal transition zone on mussel (Mytilus edulis) (1) Accumulation of pseudofaeces and of fine sediment beds. Here, average abundance and biomass was 141 m–2 through the filtration activity of Crepidula and indi- and 30 g organic dry weight per square metre, respec- viduals protruding in stacks into the water column. tively. On tidal flats with regular and extended periods of This was reported to cause changes in sediments and emersion as well as in the subtidal with swift currents in near-bottom currents (Ehrhold et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Ecology Progress Series 464:135
    Vol. 464: 135–151, 2012 MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Published September 19 doi: 10.3354/meps09872 Mar Ecol Prog Ser Physical and biological factors affect the vertical distribution of larvae of benthic gastropods in a shallow embayment Michelle J. Lloyd1,*, Anna Metaxas1, Brad deYoung2 1Department of Oceanography, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada B3H 4R2 2Department of Physics and Physical Oceanography, Memorial University, St. John’s, Newfoundland, Canada A1B 3X7 ABSTRACT: Marine gastropods form a diverse taxonomic group, yet little is known about the factors that affect their larval distribution and abundance. We investigated the larval vertical dis- tribution and abundance of 9 meroplanktonic gastropod taxa (Margarites spp., Crepidula spp., Astyris lunata, Diaphana minuta, Littorinimorpha, Arrhoges occidentalis, Ilyanassa spp., Bittiolum alternatum and Nudibranchia), with similar morphology and swimming abilities, but different adult habitats and life-history strategies. We explored the role of physical (temperature, salinity, density, current velocities) and biological (fluorescence) factors, as well as periodic cycles (lunar phase, tidal state, diel period) in regulating larval vertical distribution. Using a pump, we collected plankton samples at 6 depths (3, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 m) at each tidal state, every 2 h over a 36 and a 26 h period, during a spring and neap tide, respectively, in St. George’s Bay, Nova Scotia. Con- currently, we measured temperature, salinity, density, fluorescence (as a proxy for chlorophyll, i.e. phytoplankton density), and current velocity. Larval abundance was most strongly related to tem- perature, except for Littorinimorpha and Crepidula spp., for which it was most strongly related to fluorescence. Margarites spp., A.
    [Show full text]
  • Size at Maturation, Spawning Variability and Fecundity in the Queen Conch, Aliger Gigas
    Gulf and Caribbean Research Volume 31 Issue 1 2020 Size at Maturation, Spawning Variability and Fecundity in the Queen Conch, Aliger gigas Richard S. Appeldoorn GCFIMembers, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://aquila.usm.edu/gcr Part of the Marine Biology Commons, and the Population Biology Commons To access the supplemental data associated with this article, CLICK HERE. Recommended Citation Appeldoorn, R. S. 2020. Size at Maturation, Spawning Variability and Fecundity in the Queen Conch, Aliger gigas. Gulf and Caribbean Research 31 (1): GCFI 10-GCFI 19. Retrieved from https://aquila.usm.edu/gcr/vol31/iss1/11 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18785/gcr.3101.11 This Gulf and Caribbean Fisheries Institute Partnership is brought to you for free and open access by The Aquila Digital Community. It has been accepted for inclusion in Gulf and Caribbean Research by an authorized editor of The Aquila Digital Community. For more information, please contact [email protected]. VOLUME 25 VOLUME GULF AND CARIBBEAN Volume 25 RESEARCH March 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS GULF AND CARIBBEAN SAND BOTTOM MICROALGAL PRODUCTION AND BENTHIC NUTRIENT FLUXES ON THE NORTHEASTERN GULF OF MEXICO NEARSHORE SHELF RESEARCH Jeffrey G. Allison, M. E. Wagner, M. McAllister, A. K. J. Ren, and R. A. Snyder....................................................................................1—8 WHAT IS KNOWN ABOUT SPECIES RICHNESS AND DISTRIBUTION ON THE OUTER—SHELF SOUTH TEXAS BANKS? Harriet L. Nash, Sharon J. Furiness, and John W. Tunnell, Jr. ......................................................................................................... 9—18 Volume 31 ASSESSMENT OF SEAGRASS FLORAL COMMUNITY STRUCTURE FROM TWO CARIBBEAN MARINE PROTECTED 2020 AREAS ISSN: 2572-1410 Paul A.
    [Show full text]
  • Littorina Littorea Class
    . Easily seen year round along the Littorina littorea shore line of Burntcoat Class: Gastropoda Head. Order: Neotaenioglossa Family: Littorinidae Genus: Littorina Distribution The Littorinidae family is a In the genus Littorina is the species L.littorea commonly known group of over 200 known as the edible periwinkle. It is native to the north-eastern coasts species of sea snails, of the Atlantic Ocean, including northern Spain, France, commonly referred to as England, Scotland, Ireland, Scandinavia and Russia and has been periwinkles. They have a introduced to the Atlantic coast of North America. It is now a global distribution. Within predominant mollusc from New Jersey to Newfoundland. In this family of periwinkles Canada, their range includes New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, there are several genera, Quebec, Newfoundland and Labrador. one of which is Litttorina. They are plentiful at Burntcoat Head. Habitat Though most abundant on rocky substrates and common in tide In the Atlantic it is found pools, it is a habitat generalist that also occurs on muddy or on both open coast and sandy bottoms. They are found along the entire coast, on estuary habitats from the breakwaters, dikes, piers, etc. In favourable habitats, it reaches upper intertidal zone to densities of up to 200-800 individuals per square metre. about 40 metres deep, and Since its arrival in North America it has become the most can tolerate salinities down abundant shallow-water herbivorous snail from Nova Scotia to to around 13 ppt. Long Island Sound. Food Although primarily an algae grazer, it also feeds on small L. littorea is a mostly invertebrates such as barnacle larvae.
    [Show full text]
  • Are the Traditional Medical Uses of Muricidae Molluscs Substantiated by Their Pharmacological Properties and Bioactive Compounds?
    Mar. Drugs 2015, 13, 5237-5275; doi:10.3390/md13085237 OPEN ACCESS marine drugs ISSN 1660-3397 www.mdpi.com/journal/marinedrugs Review Are the Traditional Medical Uses of Muricidae Molluscs Substantiated by Their Pharmacological Properties and Bioactive Compounds? Kirsten Benkendorff 1,*, David Rudd 2, Bijayalakshmi Devi Nongmaithem 1, Lei Liu 3, Fiona Young 4,5, Vicki Edwards 4,5, Cathy Avila 6 and Catherine A. Abbott 2,5 1 Marine Ecology Research Centre, School of Environment, Science and Engineering, Southern Cross University, G.P.O. Box 157, Lismore, NSW 2480, Australia; E-Mail: [email protected] 2 School of Biological Sciences, Flinders University, G.P.O. Box 2100, Adelaide 5001, Australia; E-Mails: [email protected] (D.R.); [email protected] (C.A.A.) 3 Southern Cross Plant Science, Southern Cross University, G.P.O. Box 157, Lismore, NSW 2480, Australia; E-Mail: [email protected] 4 Medical Biotechnology, Flinders University, G.P.O. Box 2100, Adelaide 5001, Australia; E-Mails: [email protected] (F.Y.); [email protected] (V.E.) 5 Flinders Centre for Innovation in Cancer, Flinders University, G.P.O. Box 2100, Adelaide 5001, Australia 6 School of Health Science, Southern Cross University, G.P.O. Box 157, Lismore, NSW 2480, Australia; E-Mail: [email protected] * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +61-2-8201-3577. Academic Editor: Peer B. Jacobson Received: 2 July 2015 / Accepted: 7 August 2015 / Published: 18 August 2015 Abstract: Marine molluscs from the family Muricidae hold great potential for development as a source of therapeutically useful compounds.
    [Show full text]