Harmonisation of Family Law in Europe: a Historical Perspective European Family Law Series

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Harmonisation of Family Law in Europe: a Historical Perspective European Family Law Series HARMONISATION OF FAMILY LAW IN EUROPE: A HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE EUROPEAN FAMILY LAW SERIES Published by the Organising Committee of the Commission on European Family Law Prof. Katharina Boele-Woelki (Utrecht) Prof. Frédérique Ferrand (Lyon) Dr. Cristina González Beilfuss (Barcelona) Prof. Maarit Jänterä-Jareborg (Uppsala) Prof. Nigel Lowe (Cardiff) Prof. Dieter Martiny (Frankfurt/Oder) Prof. Walter Pintens (Leuven) HARMONISATION OF FAMILY LAW IN EUROPE: A HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE A tale of two millennia MASHA ANTOKOLSKAIA Antwerpen – Oxford Distribution for the UK: Distribution for North America: Hart Publishing Gaunt Inc. Salter’s Boat Yard Gaunt Building Folly Bridge 3011 Gulf Drive Abingdon Road Holmes Beach Oxford OX1 4LB Florida 34217-2199 UK USA Tel: + 44 1865 24 55 33 Tel: + 1 941 778 5211 Fax: + 44 1865 79 48 82 Fax: + 1 941 778 5252 Distribution for Switzerland and Distribution for other countries: Germany: Intersentia Publishers Stämpfli Verlag AG Groenstraat 31 Wölflistrasse 1 BE-2640 Mortsel CH-3001 Bern Belgium Switzerland Tel: + 32 3 680 15 50 Tel: + 41 (0)31 300 63 18 Fax: + 32 3 658 71 21 Fax: + 41 (0)31 300 66 88 Harmonisation of Family Law in Europe: A Historical Perspective Masha Antokolskaia © 2006 Intersentia Antwerpen – Oxford http://www.intersentia.com © 2006 M.V. Antokolskaia ISBN-10: 90-5095-576-2 ISBN-13: 978-90-5095-576-8 D/2006/7849/62 NUR 822 and 828 No part of this book may be reproduced in any form, by print, photoprint, microfilm or any other means, without written permission from the publisher. For my mother ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This research has been made possible by a fellowship from the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences. I am deeply indebted to the Royal Academy for supporting and financing this research. I am also deeply indebted to Katharina Boele- Woelki for granting me the opportunity to resume the thread of my academic activities in The Netherlands at the Molengraaff Instituut of Private Law of the University of Utrecht. I am very grateful to her for initiating, hosting and supporting this research, and for five years of most pleasant, fruitful and educative collaboration. A research covering such a time span and such a range of jurisdictions would be neither possible nor sensible without the invaluable help of a network of academic colleagues. I am very grateful to all those who assisted me, in particular to the colleagues who read large parts of the manuscript of this book and made helpful remarks and suggestions. Errors and conclusions are mine. Special thanks to Hans Ankum of the University of Amsterdam for commenting on the Chapter on Roman law, as well as Jan Hallebeek and Lieke Coenraad of the Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam and Chris Coppens of the University of Nijmegen for their comment on the historical chapters of this book. I owe a special dept to Katharina Boele-Woelki of the University of Utrecht, Dieter Martiny of the Europa Universität Viadrina (Frankfurt/Oder, Germany), Bente Braat of the University of Utrecht, Frédérique Ferrand of the Université Jean Moulin (Leon, France), David Bradley of the London School of Economics, Maarit Jänterä-Jareborg of the Uppsala University and Tone Sverdrup of the University of Oslo, for their remarks on the sections concerning German, French, English and Nordic law. I also owe much to the thought provoking discussions with Marie-Thérèse Meulders-Klein, University of Louvain de Neuve, Belgium, and with David Bradley. To my husband and colleague Arno Akkermans, who contributed to the coming into being of this book in many different ways, I owe more than words can say. I am also very grateful to the faculty of law of the Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam and to my colleagues there for enabling me to complete this project after I had gotten a chair there. I would like to thank Scott Curry-Sumner for revising my English and my student-assistant Naomi Spalter for helping me with the final technical touches and for her wonderful illustrations. Finally, I would like to thank my mother for her emotional support and my cat Murzik for being a most perfect anti-stress ball during the years that this research was carried out. Masha Antokolskaia Intersentia vii PREFACE The idea of this study first crossed my mind when I was asked to contribute to a report on the perspectives of the harmonisation of family law in Europe for the Netherlands Comparative Law Association.1 I was challenged by the idea of exploring the main objection to family law harmonisation, the so-called ‘cultural constraints argument’. This argument suggests that it is principally impossible to harmonise family law because the family laws of the different European countries are deeply embedded in their unique national cultures and history. The cultural constraints argument gives rise to two main questions. The first question, whether family law has converged in the past and currently converges in the present, is in principle a historical-empirical one. The other question, whether convergence and the deliberate harmonisation of family law are possible at all, also seems empirical at first sight, but an analysis of the debate on this issue will reveal that the essence of the discord is on the theoretical, rather than the empirical level. The main purpose of this book is to suggest answers to these two questions through the analysis of convergence and divergence tendencies and the historical instances of deliberate harmonisation in the field of marriage, unmarried cohabitation, divorce, the position of extramarital children, and matrimonial property, in the majority of Europe throughout the last two millennia. In spite of the long span of time and the large geographical and institutional areas covered, this book has a rather limited scope. It does not deal with most of the issues involved in the contemporary debate surrounding the deliberate harmonisation of family law in Europe; such as whether such harmonisation is necessary or desirable, what methods should be employed to achieve it, which fields should be chosen, whether the EU has competence to harmonise family law, and so on. Save a single exception, neither does this book deal with the activities of the Commission on European Family Law (CEFL). The research for this book had already started before the CEFL was established in 2001. My inspiration for this research became all the stronger when, in 2001, I became a member of the CEFL Expert Group. This made me a ‘participating observer’ and allowed me to look into the ‘harmonisation kitchen’. However, this study neither follows the patterns of the CEFL’s work, nor comments on it. While the CEFL is primarily focussed on drafting activities – elaborating Principles of European Family 1 ANTOKOLSKAIA, M., DE HONDT, W., STEENHOFF, G., Naar een Europees Familierecht (1999). Intersentia ix Preface Law – the research presented in this book is entirely devoted to historical and theoretical issues. x Intersentia TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................vii PREFACE .......................................................... ix LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS .........................................xxvii PART I. INTRODUCTION CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION ....................................................3 1.1. The Harmonisation of Family Law and the Cultural Constraints Argument .....................................................3 1.2. Trying to Avoid Selection Bias ....................................9 1.2.1. Choice of Historical Periods. Why Two Millennia? ...........9 1.2.2. Choice of Fields of Family Law ..........................10 1.2.3. Choice of Jurisdictions .................................10 1.3. Method of Comparative Research ................................11 1.3.1. Law in Context, Law in the Books and Law in Action ........11 1.3.2. Combining Comparative and Historical Research ..........12 1.4. General Outline of this Book ....................................13 CHAPTER 2. THE CULTURAL CONSTRAINTS ARGUMENT, CONVERGENCE, AND HARMONISATION: THEORETICAL ASPECTS ....................15 2.1. Introduction ..................................................15 2.2. The Danger of Talking at Cross Purposes. The Conceptual Framework of this Book ........................................15 2.2.1. The Concepts of Convergence, Harmonisation, and Unification as Used in this Book .........................16 Harmonisation embraces unification .................16 Intersentia xi Table of Contents Different forms of harmonisation and the definition of convergence ....................................17 Top-down harmonisation ...........................17 Deliberate bottom-up harmonisation .................18 Spontaneous bottom-up harmonisation (convergence) . 21 2.2.2. Convergence and Evolution .............................23 2.3. Relativism, Universalism and Pluralism: Harmonisation as Part of the ‘Unfinished Modernity Project’ .............................27 2.3.1. Integrative and Contrastive Comparative Law ..............27 Looking for sameness or difference? ..................27 Historical roots of the integrative and contrastive approaches in comparative law ......................28 Philosophical roots of the integrative and the contrastive approach ...............................29 Harmonisation of law as a part of the ‘unfinished Modernity project’ .................................32 Post-modernist and Modernity arguments in the current comparative law debates .....................33 2.3.2. The Fallacy of the Extremes: The Need to Search for a Middle Way ..........................................36
Recommended publications
  • Acta Juridica Hungarica
    ACTA JURIDICA HUNGARICA HUNGARIAN JOURNAL OF LEGAL STUDIES Editor-in-Chief Vilmos Peschka Akadémiai Kiadó Budapest Member of Wolters Kluwer Group HUNGARIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES ACTA JURIDICA HUNGARICA HUNGARIAN JOURNAL OF LEGAL STUDIES Acta Juridica Hungarica presents the achievements of the legal sciences and legal scholars in Hungary and details the Hungarian legislation and legal literature. The journal accepts articles from every field of the legal sciences. Recently the editors have encouraged contributions from outside Hungary, with the aim of covering the legal sciences in the whole of Central and Eastern Europe. Acta Juridica Hungarica is abstracted/indexed in Information Technology and the Law, International Bibliographies IBZ and IBR, Worldwide Political Science Abstracts. Editor-in-Chief VLLMOS PESCHKA Board of Editors GÉZA HERCZEGH, ISTVÁN KERTÉSZ, TIBOR KIRÁLY, FERENC MÁDL, ATTILA RÁCZ, ANDRÁS SAJÓ, TAMÁS SÁRKÖZY Editor VANDA LAMM Manuscripts and editorial correspondence should be addressed to ACTA JURIDICA HUNGARICA P.O. Box 25, H-1250 Budapest, Hungary Phone: (36 1) 355 7384 Fax: (36 1) 375 7858 Orders sholuld be addressed to AKADÉMIAI KIADÓ P.O. Box 245, H-1519 Budapest, Hungary Fax: (36 1)464 8221 E-mail: [email protected] http://www.akkrt.hu Subscription price for Volume 46 (2005) in 4 issues: EUR 216 + VAT including online access and normal postage; airmail delivery EUR 20. Customers are advised to place their orders - in the USA at EBSCO Subscription Services (P.O. Box 1943, Birmingham, AL 3520-1943) - in Japan at MARUZEN Company, Ltd., Journal Divison (P.O. Box 5050, Tokyo International 100-3191) © Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest 2005 AJur 46 (2005) 1-2 ACTA JURIDICA HUNGARICA HUNGARIAN JOURNAL OF LEGAL STUDIES Vol.46.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Civil Procedure
    R. L. R. Comparative Civil Procedure Peter GOTTWALD* I. General functions and aims of comparative law The comparison of legal systems is a special method within jurisprudence. With regard to its important functions it is world-wide also regarded as a separate branch of jurisprudence.1) There is no branch of science which may base its knowledge only on ideas and ndings being born within national boundaries. This is particularly true within our modern world of globalisation. Comparative law then leads not only to a better knowledge of foreign law but is also corresponding to the internationalisation of law and jurisprudence and the globalisation of politics, of trade, commerce and private life style. Jurisprudence is not just the science of interpreting national laws, statutes, legal principles, rules and standards. It should comprise the search for models of preventing and solving social con icts within a world-wide society. In looking what has been done beyond the own borders comparative law offers incentives and a broader scope of models of solving a problem that could be and have been developed within national boundaries. Lawyers of all legal systems of the world are by far more imaginative than one lawyer could think up within his short life. Comparative law thus may be an ecoledeverite, enrich the stock of possible solutions , and moreover offer the chance to nd better solutions for the particular time and the particular country than by restricting to local or national doctrinal disputes. If you take this earnestly, comparative law is an exciting intellectual adventure, calling for a maximum of phantasy and of discipline.
    [Show full text]
  • Legal Harmonisation from the Perspective of the Economic Analysis of Law
    Legal Harmonisation from the PerspectiVe of the Economic Analysis of LaW M ICHAEL G. F AURE * I. Introduction In this paper, I address the potential contribution of the economic analysis of laW to the debate concerning the need for the harmonisation of private laW in Europe. The focus of this paper will indeed mainly be on this harmonisation issue. Indeed, one WaY in which an economic analysis can be useful for the studY of European integration is that economics has focused a lot of attention on the division of competences within federal systems. This is a topic which, from a European legal perspectiVe, is obviouslY releVant to the subsidiarity principle. From an economic perspectiVe, the question which is addressed in the economics of federalism is what the optimal leVel would be for speci fi c types of regulation. In this paper, I argue that this literature is highlY useful also for addressing the harmonisation debate with respect to private law. In the paper, I address the desirabilitY of the harmonisation of private laW from an economic angle. Economists haVe indeed paid much attention to the po- tential goals, functions and economic effects of a harmonisation of laW 1 . * Institute for Transnational Legal Research (METRO), Maastricht, and Rotterdam Insti- tute for LaW and Economics (RKE), Rotterdam, The Netherlands. 1 This paper builds on earlier research in which harmonisation efforts Were analysed from an economic angle with respect to environmental laW (Michael F AURE , Harmonization of Environmental LaW and Market Integration:
    [Show full text]
  • 12015 Kutafin University Law Review
    ISSN 2313-5395 KUTAFIN UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW Volume 2 May 2015 Issue 1(3) CORRUPTION: LEGAL LABYRINTHS IN HEAVENLY HELL RIGHT TO PRIVATE PROPERTY: CONSTITUTIONAL EVOLUTION LEGAL RELATIONS ON THE INTERNET SOCIALIST PRIVATE LAW: OXYMORON OR SPECIAL MODEL? THE INTERPRETIVE APPROACH TO INTERNATIONAL LAW: A POSITIVIST VIEW THE BEST OF THE FIFTH INTERNATIONAL LEGAL FORUM IN SAINT Next issue: special edition PETERSBURG www.kulawr.ru www.kulawr.ru [email protected] THETHE BESTBEST IDEASIDEAS AREARE ALWAYSALWAYS WWELCOMED!ELCOMED! II BRIEF TABLE OF CONTENTS Welcome Note ...............................................................................................................2 LAW EVOLUTION Development of Private (Civil) Law in Central and Eastern Europe after World War II Article by Gábor Hamza (Hungary) .............................................................................3 Right to Private Property: Constitutional Evolution Article by Veniamin Chirkin (Russia) .......................................................................32 CORRUPTION: LEGAL LABYRINTHS IN HEAVENLY HELL No Safe Haven: DOJ Can and Will Seize Proceeds of Wholly Foreign Corruption Article by Kathleen Hamann & David R. Courchaine (USA) ....................................44 Russian Specifi cs of Combating Corruption Article by Anna Shashkova (Russia) ..........................................................................51 MODERN LAW AND MODERN TECHNOLOGIES Legal Relations on the Internet Article by Abdudzhabar Abdujalilov (Tajikistan) ......................................................68
    [Show full text]
  • The Need for the Harmonisation of Trade Laws in the Southern African Development Community (Sadc)
    Cornell Law Library Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository Cornell Law Faculty Publications Faculty Scholarship 1-1-1996 The eedN for the Harmonisation of Trade Laws in the Southern African Development Community (SADC) Muna Ndulo Cornell Law School, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/facpub Part of the International Law Commons, International Trade Commons, and the Law and Economics Commons Recommended Citation Ndulo, Muna, "The eN ed for the Harmonisation of Trade Laws in the Southern African Development Community (SADC)" (1996). Cornell Law Faculty Publications. Paper 60. http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/facpub/60 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Cornell Law Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE NEED FOR THE HARMONISATION OF TRADE LAWS IN THE SOUTHERN AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY (SADC) Muna Ndulo* A. INTRODUCTION The Southern African Development Community (SADC) comprises the following member states: Angola, Botswana, Lesotho, Malawi, Mauritius, Mozambique, Namibia, South Africa, Swaziland, Tanzania, Zambia and Zimbabwe. Its principal objective is to foster closer economic and political ties among its member states and prepare the ground for the establishment of an economic community. SADC was established by Treaty in 1992.1. In addition to the above mentioned objectives, the Treaty sets out cooperation among member states, the institutions of the community and the modalities for the achievement of its goals.
    [Show full text]
  • English for Lawyers
    Міністерство освіти і науки, молоді та спорту України Національний університет «Юридична академія України імені Ярослава Мудрого» English for Lawyers Підручник для студентів вищих навчальних закладів За редакцією професора В. П. Сімонок Затверджено Міністерством освіти і науки, молоді та спорту України Харків «Право» 2011 ББК 81.2+67 I-59 Затверджено Міністерством освіти і науки, молоді та спорту України як підручник для студентів вищих навчальних закладів (лист № 1/11-7526 від 10 серпня 2011 р.) Рекомендовано до друку вченою радою Національного університету «Юридична академія України імені Ярослава Мудрого» (протокол № 9 від 22 квітня 2011 р.) Рецензенти : Н. В. Тучина, кандидат педагогічних наук, професор, декан факультету іноземної філології Харківського національного педагогічного університету імені Г. С. Сковороди; Л. М. Пелепейченко, доктор філологічних наук, професор, завідувач кафедри філології, перекладу та мовної комунікації Академії внутрішніх військ Міністерства внутрішніх справ України English for Lawyers : підруч. для студ. вищ. навч. закл. / за ред. I-59 В. П. Сімонок. – Х. : Право, 2011. – 648 с. ISBN 978-966-458-264-0 Підручник «English for Lawyers» призначений для професійно орієн- тованого усного і писемного спілкування. Містить інформацію про правові системи та судочинство України, Великої Британії та США, знайомить сту- дентів з конституційним, адміністративним, міжнародним, кримінальним і цивільним правом, кримінальним і цивільним процесом цих країн. Розрахований на студентів вищих юридичних навчальних закладів. ББК 81.2+67 © Сімонок В. П., Лисицька О. П., Семьонкіна І. А. та ін., 2011 ISBN 978-966-458-264-0 © «Право», 2011 Contents PART I. Legal Systems Unit 1. Systems of Law Section 1. Modern Legal Systems ...............................................................10 Section 2. Law and Society......................................................................... 17 Unit 2. Evolution of Law: Historical Aspect Section 1.
    [Show full text]
  • HARMONISATION and the UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION on CONTRACTS for the INTERNATIONAL SALE of GOODS by Troy Keily1
    HARMONISATION AND THE UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION ON CONTRACTS FOR THE INTERNATIONAL SALE OF GOODS by Troy Keily1 Nordic Journal of Commercial Law issue 2003 #1 1 Troy Keily is an Australian lawyer. He holds a Bachelor of Arts & Bachelor of Laws (Honours) degree from Deakin University. This paper was completed as part of a Masters degree in Public & International Trade Law at The University of Melbourne. Nordic Journal of Commercial Law, issue 2003 #1 1. INTRODUCTION After many years of negotiation, the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (“CISG”) came into force in 1988. Today, 62 states have adopted the CISG. Together these countries account for over two-thirds of all world trade.2 On this basis alone, the CISG is an outstanding success in the legal harmonisation of the law governing the international sale of goods. However, the CISG has its critics and much comment has been made on the failure of the CISG to achieve its goal of promoting international trade through a body of uniform rules. The primary motivation driving the push for a harmonised law on the international sale of goods is economic: a harmonised law makes it easier and more efficient for the business person to sell and buy goods across state borders. However, the engine driving the push for harmonisation is political and cultural; and the task of creating the harmonised law belongs to the diplomat.3 A study of the CISG demonstrates that the political and cultural demands on the diplomat also act as shackles that restrain the achievement of a harmonised law.
    [Show full text]
  • International Law in Antiquity
    This page intentionally left blank International Law in Antiquity This study of the origins of international law combines techniques of intellectual history and historiography to investigate the earliest developments of the law of nations. The book examines the sources, processes, and doctrines of international legal obligation in antiquity to reevaluate the critical attributes of international law. David J. Bederman focuses on three essential areas in which law influenced ancient State relations – diplomacy, treaty-making, and warfare – in a detailed analysis of international relations in the Near East (2800–700 BCE), the Greek city-States (500–338 BCE), and Rome (358–168 BCE). Containing up-to-date literature and archeological evidence, this study does not merely catalogue instances of recognition by ancient States of these seminal features of international law: it accounts for recurrent patterns of thinking and practice. This comprehensive analysis of international law and State relations in ancient times provides a fascinating study for lawyers and academics, ancient historians and classicists alike. david j. bederman is Professor of Law at Emory University’s School of Law in Atlanta, Georgia. His previous publications cover such diverse subjects as international legal theory and history, the law of the sea and international environment, the law of State responsibility and international claims, US constitutional law of foreign relations, and maritime law. cambridge studies in international and comparative law This series (established in 1946 by Professors Gutteridge, Hersch Lauterpacht and McNair) is a forum for high quality studies in the fields of public and private international and comparative law. Although these are distinct sub-disciplines, developments since 1946 confirm their interrelationship.
    [Show full text]
  • Europeanisation Effects in the Court Jurisprudence
    ICLR, 2019, Vol. 19, No. 1. Europeanisation effects in the court jurisprudence Katalin Gombos1* National University of Public Service, Busapest [email protected] GOMBOS, Katalin. Europeanisation effects in the court jurisprudence.Inter - national and Comparative Law Review, 2019, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 261–275. DOI: 10.2478/iclr-2018-0059 Summary: Nowadays, the notion of Europeanisation, which has formerly been used as a description for multi-level governance, prevails also in the area of law. Legal Euro- peanisation is a process that appears in the interactions of legal systems of the Member States between one another, as well as between European law and the laws of the Mem- ber States. Its main area is the appearance of European legal elements in the legal prac- tice of Member States. At some point, the court practice of Member States may affect European law, as well. Due to the occurrence of comparative law elements, interactions can be observed between courts in the EU. According to our basic premise, the interac- tions can be best observed through the practice of different courts. This article aims to prove this premise by establishing different guiding principles through further Hungar- ian court decisions in the field of civil law. Keywords: Legal Europeanisation, interactions of jurisprudence, comparative law meth- ods, interpretation, doctrine of legal interpretation, the impact of autonomous dogmas, principle of the obligation of interpretation, living European law, Hungarian case law 1 Introduction The European Union and its Member States also have their own legal systems. Court of Justice of the European Union (hereinafter as: CJEU) has an exclusive right to interpret European law.
    [Show full text]
  • Harmonisation of Laws in the East African Community
    HARMONISATION OF LAWS IN THE EAST AFRICAN COMMUNITY The State of Affairs with Comparative Insights from the European Union and other Regional Economic Communities Funded by Volkswagen Foundation HARMONISATION OF LAWS IN THE EAST AFRICAN COMMUNITY The State of Affairs with Comparative Insights from the European Union and other Regional Economic Communities Edited by Johannes Döveling, Hamudi I. Majamba, Richard Frimpong Oppong, Ulrike Wanitzek TGCL Series 5 2018 Published by LawAfrica Publishing (K) Ltd. Top Plaza, 3rd Floor Kindaruma Road, (Off Ngong Road) P.O. Box 4260-00100 GPO Nairobi, Kenya Wireless: +254 20 249 5067 Cell: +254 708 898 189 Fax: +254 20 249 5067 Email: [email protected] Website: www.lawafrica.com © Johannes Döveling, Hamudi I. Majamba, Richard Frimpong Oppong, Ulrike Wanitzek ISBN: 978-9966-53-071-4 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION Johannes Döveling, Hamudi I. Majamba, Richard Frimpong Oppong, Ulrike Wanitzek ....................................................... ix OPENING REMARKS FROM THE EAC SECRETARIAT Some Observations on Practical Aspects of the Harmonisation of Economic Laws in the East African Community Context Michel Ndayikengurukiye ................................................................................. 3 PART I: REGIONAL INTEGRATION AND FUNDAMENTALS OF LEGAL HARMONISATION Law of Regional Integration – A Case Study of the East African Community James Otieno-Odek .......................................................................................... 17 An Enquiry into the Achievements and Challenges
    [Show full text]
  • Secured Transactions Law Reform in Europe
    Secured Transactions Law Reform in Europe Dr. Ole Böger Hanseatic Court of Appeal in Bremen, Germany (Hanseatisches Oberlandesgericht in Bremen) Conference on International Coordination of Secured Transactions Law Reforms University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, 09-10 February 2017 I. Secured transactions reform in European Union law 1. EU competence for secured transactions reform: - Art. 114 Lisbon Treaty: Adoption of measures necessary for the establishment and functioning of the European internal market - ECJ: No general power to regulate the internal market. Mere differences between national laws as such do no justify the harmonisation of law - Art. 352 Lisbon Treaty allows other measures by unanimous action by the Counci EU instruments on the harmonization of secured transactions law must be suitable for common law and civil law jurisdictions 2. Late Payments Directive (2000/2011) and the Insolvency Regulation (2000/2015): Recognition of the retention of ownership - Retention of ownership recognized as such, - but requirements for validity to be determined under applicable national law 3. Financial Collateral Directive (2002): Flexibility and lack of formal requirements for security over financial assets - functional approach: no distinction between title transfer security and security rights - security over financial assets to be perfected by control - secured creditor may dispose over financial collateral before default - appropriation as method of enforcement of financial collateral I. Secured transactions reform in European
    [Show full text]
  • Perspectives for the Unification and Harmonisation of Family Law in Europe Took Place in Utrecht from 11Th - 14Th of December 2002
    Ka t harina (ed) Boele-Woelki A book series dedicated to the harmonisation and unification of family and succession law in Europe. The European Family Law series includes comparative legal studies and materials as well as studies on the effects of international and European law making within the national legal systems in Europe. The books are published in English, French or German under the auspices of the Organising Committee of the Commission on European Family Law. For the first time in European legal history, a truly international conference devoted to the perspectives for the unification and harmonisation of family law in Europe took place in Utrecht from 11th - 14th of December 2002. The contributions to this conference, Harmonisation in Europe Law of Family 4 Perspectives for the which was organised under the auspices of the Commission on European Pe Family Law (CEFL), are compiled in this book. Is the unification and r spectives for the Unification and harmonisation of (international) family law in Europe necessary? Is it Unification and feasible, desirable and possible? Reading the different contributions to this book may certainly inspire those who would like to find Harmonisation of the right answers to these questions. Family Law in Europe Katharina Boele-Woelki (ed) 4 Ka t harina (ed) Boele-Woelki A book series dedicated to the harmonisation and unification of family and succession law in Europe. The European Family Law series includes comparative legal studies and materials as well as studies on the effects of international and European law making within the national legal systems in Europe. The books are published in English, French or German under the auspices of the Organising Committee of the Commission on European Family Law.
    [Show full text]