DOCSLIB.ORG

Comparative Study on the Implementation of the ECHR at the National Level

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Comparative Study on the Implementation of the ECHR at the National Level Comparative study on the implementation of the ECHR at the national level This comparative analysis deals with the issues of application of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ECHR) in national legal systems of severalStatesPartiestotheConvention. These important issues are dealt with in eight articles elaborating the application of the ECHR in Croatia, France, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Poland, Russia and Serbia. Countries were selected following two criteria: monistic or dualistic systems – in order to demonstrate different legal consequences in both systems due to the application of the European Convention, and the commencement of the application of the Convention – presenting the states that have been parties to the Convention since its adoption, as well as those that have become so in the past two decades, which affects different level of activity of their n courtsregardingtheimplementationoftheConvention. The experience from one country, as shown here, can serve as the inspiration for improving the implementation in another, as well as for overcoming certain obstacles and problems identifiedinthearticles. www.coe.int/nationalimplementation ENG Comparative study o the implementation of the ECHR at the national level The Council of Europe is the continent's leading human Alessia Cozzi rights organisation. It comprises 47 member states, 28 of Athanassia Sykiotou which are members of the European Union. All Council of Dagmara Rajska www.coe.int Europe member states have signed up to the European Convention on Human Rights, a treaty designed to protect Ivana Krstic human rights, democracy and the rule of law. The Maria Filatova European Court of Human Rights oversees the Nikolina Katic implementation of the Convention in the member states. Petra Bard Stephanie Bourgeois Council of Europe COMPARATIVE STUDY on the Implementation of the ECHR at the National Level Authors Alessia Cozzi, Athanassia Sykiotou, Dagmara Rajska, Ivana Krstic, Maria Filatova, Nikolina Katic, Petra Bard, Stephanie Bourgeois This publication has been prepared within the framework of the “Human Rights Friendly Judiciary” project funded by the Human Rights Trust Fund and implemented by the Council of Europe. The opinions expressed in this work are the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy of the Council of Europe. Council of Europe Belgrade 2016 Publisher Council of Europe Office in Belgrade Španskih boraca 3, 11070 Belgrade www.coe.org.rs For the Publisher Tim Cartwright Editor Silvija Panović-Đurić ISBN 978-86-84437-85-5 Circulation 500 Print, layout and cover design Dosije studio, Belgrade Copyright©2016 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated, reproduced or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic (CD-Rom, Internet, etc.) or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or any information storage or retrieval system, without the prior permission in writing from the Directorate of Communications (F-67075 Strasbourg Cedex or [email protected]) Contents Foreword 5 Stephanie Bourgeois THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS AT THE DOMESTIC LEVEL 7 Alessia Cozzi THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS AND THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS CASE LAW IN ITALIAN JURISPRUDENCE 29 Athanassia Sykiotou THE RELATION OF GREEK COURTS WITH THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS AND THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS CASE-LAW 47 Dagmara Rajska NATIONAL IMPLEMENTATION OF THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS – EXAMPLE OF POLAND 67 Ivana Krstic STATUS AND APPLICATION OF THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS IN THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA 87 Contents 3 Maria Filatova THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS AND THE EUROPEAN COURT’S CASE-LAW IN THE RUSSIAN LEGAL ORDER 107 Nikolina Katic IMPLEMENTATION OF THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS ON NATIONAL LEVEL 129 Petra Bard – Károly Bárd THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS AND THE HUNGARIAN LEGAL SYSTEM 147 Stephanie Bourgeois IMPLEMENTATION OF THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS IN FRANCE, A PROCESS OF PROGRESSIVE ACCULTURATION 167 Comparative Study 4 Foreword omparative analysis before you is dedicated to the issue of the application of the European Convention on Human Rights in C the national legal framework of several contracting states to the Convention. This issues is of great importance, as the acceptance of the European Convention on Human Rights represents the first step towards its implementation in the national law, while the Convention leaves to the states the freedom to decide on their own how to respond to their commitment to respect and apply its provision. The way the state will do so, depends primarily on a reply to a question whether the European Convention can be applied directly, and on its status in the hierarchy of the national legal norms. Consequently, two legal systems emerged: monistic and dualistic. However, simple incorporation of the European Convention in domestic legal system is not capable of solving all problems emerging in the application of the European Convention, nor it is a guarantee of its complete and efficient application. Therefore, it is even more important to review the role of courts in this process. It is necessary to analyse up to which level national courts can examine conformity of the authorities’ procedures with the provisions of the European Convention, as well as the readiness of judges to apply the principles contained in the European Court of Human Rights jurisprudence, even in the cases when domestic legal framework provides clear basis. Replies to these important issues are provided in the eight articles dealing with the application of the European Convention in Croatia, France, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Poland, Russia and Serbia. The selection of countries was made following two principles: affiliation to the monistic, or dualistic legal system – in order to demonstrate different Foreword 5 legal consequences of both systems in the application of the European Convention; as well as the length of the contractual status, presenting the contracting states since the adoption of the Convention, respectively the states who became contracting stated in the last two decades, on which depends the level of courts’ activity in its implementation. Initially, all articles examine the status of the European Convention in domestic legal system, through the analyses of the hierarchy of legal norms and its direct application. In the second part, the authors point out the application of the European Convention and principles incorporated in the European Court’s jurisprudence by national courts, providing examples from both good and bad practice in the national case law. Finally, all authors give recommendations for improvement of the implementation of the European Convention and further steps that should be taken for the better, more effective and thorough implementation of the principles and standards outlined in the European Court jurisprudence. Experience from one country can serve as an inspiration for the improvement of implementation in another country, as well as a way to overcome some common obstacles and issues identified in the articles. Brief comparative overview of solutions from several states is given at the beginning. We hope that you will find this publication useful for your future professional endeavours. Comparative Study 6 The Implementation of the European Convention on Human Rights at the Domestic Level1 Stephanie Bourgeois Former lawyer at the ECtHR I. The Status of the European Convention on Human Rights in domestic law . 8 A. Preliminary remarks: the legal force of international treaties in the domestic legal order, monism versus dualism. 8 1. The dualistic view . 8 2. The monistic view. 9 B. Constitutional variety in Member States . 10 II. Judicial practices . 13 A. Consistent interpretation. 13 1. Constitutional provisions. 14 2. Legislative provisions . 16 3. Constitutional courts’ case law . 16 B. Judicial disapplication of domestic law . 20 1. Disapplication practice on constitutional bases . 21 2. Disapplication devised by domestic judges . 21 3. Constitutional provisions empowering national judges to disapply national law that conflicts with international treaties . 22 C. The limits to primacy: the counter-limits doctrine . 23 III. Conclusion . 27 1 Initial version of this Article has been prepared within the Council of Europe HELP programme. This version is revised and updated one. Stephanie Bourgeois 7 t is primarily the task of the national authorities of Contracting States to secure the rights and freedoms set forth in the Convention. To I what extent the national courts can play a part in this, by reviewing the acts and omissions of those national authorities, depends mainly on the question of whether the provisions of the Convention are directly applicable in proceedings before those national courts. The answer to this question depends in turn on the effect of the Convention within the national legal system concerned. The Convention does not impose upon the Contracting States the obligation to make the Convention part of domestic law or otherwise to guarantee its national applicability and prevalence over national law. I. The Status of the European Convention on Human Rights in domestic law A. Preliminary remarks: the legal force of international treaties in the domestic legal order, monism versus dualism In the context of the relationship
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Acta Juridica Hungarica
    ACTA JURIDICA HUNGARICA HUNGARIAN JOURNAL OF LEGAL STUDIES Editor-in-Chief Vilmos Peschka Akadémiai Kiadó Budapest Member of Wolters Kluwer Group HUNGARIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES ACTA JURIDICA HUNGARICA HUNGARIAN JOURNAL OF LEGAL STUDIES Acta Juridica Hungarica presents the achievements of the legal sciences and legal scholars in Hungary and details the Hungarian legislation and legal literature. The journal accepts articles from every field of the legal sciences. Recently the editors have encouraged contributions from outside Hungary, with the aim of covering the legal sciences in the whole of Central and Eastern Europe. Acta Juridica Hungarica is abstracted/indexed in Information Technology and the Law, International Bibliographies IBZ and IBR, Worldwide Political Science Abstracts. Editor-in-Chief VLLMOS PESCHKA Board of Editors GÉZA HERCZEGH, ISTVÁN KERTÉSZ, TIBOR KIRÁLY, FERENC MÁDL, ATTILA RÁCZ, ANDRÁS SAJÓ, TAMÁS SÁRKÖZY Editor VANDA LAMM Manuscripts and editorial correspondence should be addressed to ACTA JURIDICA HUNGARICA P.O. Box 25, H-1250 Budapest, Hungary Phone: (36 1) 355 7384 Fax: (36 1) 375 7858 Orders sholuld be addressed to AKADÉMIAI KIADÓ P.O. Box 245, H-1519 Budapest, Hungary Fax: (36 1)464 8221 E-mail: [email protected] http://www.akkrt.hu Subscription price for Volume 46 (2005) in 4 issues: EUR 216 + VAT including online access and normal postage; airmail delivery EUR 20. Customers are advised to place their orders - in the USA at EBSCO Subscription Services (P.O. Box 1943, Birmingham, AL 3520-1943) - in Japan at MARUZEN Company, Ltd., Journal Divison (P.O. Box 5050, Tokyo International 100-3191) © Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest 2005 AJur 46 (2005) 1-2 ACTA JURIDICA HUNGARICA HUNGARIAN JOURNAL OF LEGAL STUDIES Vol.46.
    [Show full text]
  • KINGDOM of BELGIUM Hugues Dumont, Nicolas Lagasse, Marc
    KINGDOM OF BELGIUM Hugues Dumont, Nicolas Lagasse, Marc Van der Hulst, and Sébastien van Drooghenbroeck It is not easy to use simple language to describe something that is not simple, and Belgian federalism is far from simple. Built without preconceived ideas or an overarching doctrine, it accumulates original - sometimes labyrinthine – solutions as it goes along. In this chapter we attempt to describe the distribution of powers in Belgium as briefly as we can, without doing violence to its richness and complexity - concentrating on major characteristics rather than on an exhaustive inventory of rules. After reviewing the evolution of Belgian federalism along with its social and historical context, our chapter examines the principles that govern the distribution of powers in Belgium, paying special attention to the asymmetry of this distribution. The logic behind the development of the distribution of powers, particularly the political logic, is also discussed, as are the various problem-solving techniques used to prevent or solve conflicts stemming from the distribution of powers. The conclusion reviews how the Belgian system is functioning today and deals with the system’s prospects for the future. HISTORICAL AND CULTURAL CONTEXT OF THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION Belgium has some 10,309,795 inhabitants; its territory measures 32,500 square kilometres. Gross domestic product per capita is €23,690 (or roughly US$28,000). The kingdom’s population is divided into three main groups: six million Dutch speakers (Flemish) in the north and the Brussels area; four million French speakers in the south (Walloons) and in the Brussels area as well; and 71,000 German speakers in a small territory in the east of the country, along the German border.
    [Show full text]
  • Executive and Legislative Bodies
    Published on Eurydice (https://eacea.ec.europa.eu/national-policies/eurydice) Legislative and executive powers at the various levels Belgium is a federal state, composed of the Communities and the Regions. In the following, the federal state structure is outlined and the Government of Flanders and the Flemish Parliament are discussed. The federal level The legislative power at federal level is with the Chamber of Representatives, which acts as political chamber for holding government policy to account. The Senate is the meeting place between regions and communities of the federal Belgium. Together they form the federal parliament. Elections are held every five years. The last federal elections took place in 2014. The executive power is with the federal government. This government consists of a maximum of 15 ministers. With the possible exception of the Prime Minister, the federal government is composed of an equal number of Dutch and French speakers. This can be supplemented with state secretaries. The federal legislative power is exercised by means of acts. The Government issues Royal Orders based on these. It is the King who promulgates federal laws and ratifies them. The federal government is competent for all matters relating to the general interests of all Belgians such as finance, defence, justice, social security (pensions, sickness and invalidity insurance), foreign affairs, sections of health care and domestic affairs (the federal police, oversight on the police, state security). The federal government is also responsible for nuclear energy, public-sector companies (railways, post) and federal scientific and cultural institutions. The federal government is also responsible for all things that do not expressly come under the powers of the communities and the regions.
    [Show full text]
  • Camille Robcis the Biopolitics of Dignity
    South Atlantic Quarterly Camille Robcis The Biopolitics of Dignity “Let us not allow, within a free nation, monuments of slavery, even voluntary.” —Pierre Anastase Torné, French deputy, April 6, 1792 A few days after the shocking attacks on the ofces of Charlie Hebdo in January 2015, several French political leaders called for the revival of the “crime of national indignity” as a possible sanction against terrorists of French citizenship. As the prime minister Manuel Valls put it, such a measure—backed up, according to surveys, by 76 percent of the French population—would “mark with symbolic force the consequences of the absolute transgression that a terrorist act con- stitutes” (Clavel 2015). Under French law, national indignity did indeed have a particular history and signifcation, one that was not simply “symbolic” but in fact quite concrete. As the historian Anne Simonin (2008) shows, “national indignity” was invented in 1944 by the legal experts of the Resis- tance as an exceptional measure to punish, retro- actively, the supporters of the Vichy regime who had collaborated with the Nazi occupiers and pro- moted anti-Semitic legislation. Between 1945 and 1951, around one hundred thousand citizens were The South Atlantic Quarterly 115:2, April 2016 doi 10.1215/00382876-3488431 © 2016 Duke University Press Published by Duke University Press South Atlantic Quarterly 314 The South Atlantic Quarterly • April 2016 accused of indignity and punished by “national degradation.” In practical terms, this meant that they were stripped of their civic rights and their pos- sessions, banned from exercising certain public positions and professions (lawyers, bankers, teachers), and forbidden to live in particular regions of France.
    [Show full text]
  • Country Report on Italy for the Study on Member States' Policies for Children with Disabilities ______
    DIRECTORATE GENERAL FOR INTERNAL POLICIES POLICY DEPARTMENT C: CITIZENS' RIGHTS AND CONSTITUTIONAL AFFAIRS CIVIL LIBERTIES, JUSTICE AND HOME AFFAIRS Country Report on Italy for the Study on Member States' Policies for Children with Disabilities STUDY Abstract This study looks at the situation of children with disabilities in Italy to identify the gaps in the legal frameworks and its implementation, the obstacles faced by children with disabilities and best practices. This country study is part of a larger study which analyses 18 Member States. Based on a comparative analysis of the country studies, the report ‘Study on Member States' Policies for Children with Disabilities’ provides some recommendations for EU action to enhance the situation of children with disabilities. PE 474.426 EN This document was requested by the European Parliament's Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs. AUTHOR(S) Emanuela Canetta Marilena Verbari Under the supervision of Milieu Ltd. (Belgium); Project Managers: Marta Ballesteros and Nathalie Meurens, e-mail: [email protected] and [email protected]; Milieu Ltd, 15 rue Blanche, B-1050, Brussels, Tel: +32 2 514 3601; Fax +32 2 514 3603; web address: http://www.milieu.be/. RESPONSIBLE ADMINISTRATOR Erika Schulze Policy Department C - Citizens' Rights and Constitutional Affairs European Parliament B-1047 Brussels E-mail: [email protected] LINGUISTIC VERSIONS Original: EN Translation: IT ABOUT THE EDITOR To contact the Policy Department or to subscribe to its newsletter please write to: [email protected] European Parliament, manuscript completed in June 2013. © European Union, Brussels, 2013. This document is available on the Internet at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/studies DISCLAIMER The opinions expressed in this document are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily represent the official position of the European Parliament.
    [Show full text]
  • The Need for Sub-National Constitutions in Federal Theory and Practice
    ISSN: 2036-5438 The need for sub-national constitutions in federal theory and practice. The Belgian case by Patricia Popelier ∗ Perspectives on Federalism, Vol. 4, issue 2, 2012 Except where otherwise noted content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons 2.5 Italy License E - 36 Abstract Comparative constitutional scholarship identifies sub-national constituent power as one of the defining features of federal systems. Moreover, according to public choice theory, devolutionary federal systems are expected to favor the creation of sub-national constitutions. For these reasons, the absence of real constitutional power for the sub-states in Belgium appears to be an anomaly. The research question of this paper explores the validity of this approach. More generally, the question is: how important is it in a federal state for sub-states to have their own sub-national constitutions? Arguments pro and contra are analyzed and applied to the Belgian case. I argue that sub-national constitutionalism is a matter of political balance between national and sub-national powers, rather than a principle of federal theory Key-words Sub-national constitutions, federal theory, Belgium, devolutionary systems Except where otherwise noted content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons 2.5 Italy License E - 37 Introduction Belgium is a federal state, composed of two types of sub-states: communities and regions. The very first article of the Belgian Constitution informs the reader of this feature of the Belgian state structure. Nevertheless, the Belgian sub-states do not or only embryonically possess constituent power. Moreover, Flanders is the only sub-state demanding more constitution-making power.
    [Show full text]
  • ROMA IRSO 310S Subject: International Relations, Sociology Credits: 3 Semester/Term: ☐ Spring ☐ Fall ☒ Summer
    Instructor (s): Dr. Stefania Gialdroni & Dr. Angela Condello – in collaboration with ABUONDIRITTO NGO (President: Prof. Luigi Manconi, also President of the Human Rights Committee of the Italian Senate). Course Title: Navigating the Dangerous Seas of Universal Human Rights: the Mediterranean migration emergency Course Code: ROMA IRSO 310S Subject: International Relations, Sociology Credits: 3 Semester/Term: ☐ Spring ☐ Fall ☒ Summer Course The aim of the course is to give a complete overview of migration in Italy by Description: means of a trans-disciplinary and experiential approach. During the first two weeks of the course (Rome), the students will be provided with a historical-philosophical introduction to the phenomenon and to the legal framework; in this phase, the students will also have the opportunity to have a direct experience of the conditions of migrants and asylum seekers in Italy - for example, by visiting the Afghan Refugees Camp and other communities of migrants living in Rome as well as by interacting with the NGOs involved in the integration of migrants. During the third week, in the area of Siracusa (Sicily), where thousands of migrants arrive almost every day, the students will actively participate in the increasingly important “Festival Internazionale del Cinema di Frontiera – International Film Festival of Frontier” in Marzamemi (SR) - and will also meet the people engaged in facing the migration emergency everyday (institutional and non-institutional organizations as well as local people). The goal of this section is to make the students aware of the entire gammut of physical and emotional conditions of migrants by “sensing” their lives through the depiction on film.
    [Show full text]
  • Harmonisation of Family Law in Europe: a Historical Perspective European Family Law Series
    HARMONISATION OF FAMILY LAW IN EUROPE: A HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE EUROPEAN FAMILY LAW SERIES Published by the Organising Committee of the Commission on European Family Law Prof. Katharina Boele-Woelki (Utrecht) Prof. Frédérique Ferrand (Lyon) Dr. Cristina González Beilfuss (Barcelona) Prof. Maarit Jänterä-Jareborg (Uppsala) Prof. Nigel Lowe (Cardiff) Prof. Dieter Martiny (Frankfurt/Oder) Prof. Walter Pintens (Leuven) HARMONISATION OF FAMILY LAW IN EUROPE: A HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE A tale of two millennia MASHA ANTOKOLSKAIA Antwerpen – Oxford Distribution for the UK: Distribution for North America: Hart Publishing Gaunt Inc. Salter’s Boat Yard Gaunt Building Folly Bridge 3011 Gulf Drive Abingdon Road Holmes Beach Oxford OX1 4LB Florida 34217-2199 UK USA Tel: + 44 1865 24 55 33 Tel: + 1 941 778 5211 Fax: + 44 1865 79 48 82 Fax: + 1 941 778 5252 Distribution for Switzerland and Distribution for other countries: Germany: Intersentia Publishers Stämpfli Verlag AG Groenstraat 31 Wölflistrasse 1 BE-2640 Mortsel CH-3001 Bern Belgium Switzerland Tel: + 32 3 680 15 50 Tel: + 41 (0)31 300 63 18 Fax: + 32 3 658 71 21 Fax: + 41 (0)31 300 66 88 Harmonisation of Family Law in Europe: A Historical Perspective Masha Antokolskaia © 2006 Intersentia Antwerpen – Oxford http://www.intersentia.com © 2006 M.V. Antokolskaia ISBN-10: 90-5095-576-2 ISBN-13: 978-90-5095-576-8 D/2006/7849/62 NUR 822 and 828 No part of this book may be reproduced in any form, by print, photoprint, microfilm or any other means, without written permission from the publisher. For my mother ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This research has been made possible by a fellowship from the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences.
    [Show full text]
  • Programme 4Th World Forum on Human Rights
    FORUM_2010_PRG_GB_COUV1_EXE:Mise en page 1 09/06/10 19:18 Page1 4TH WORLD FORUM ON HUMAN RIGHTS In a world in crisis, what about Human Rights? PROGRAMME JUNE 28 TO JULY 1, 2010 NANTES - FRANCELA CITÉ - NANTES EVENTS CENTER From universal principles to local action Monday 28th June Lascaux Meetings From land to food, from values to rules – Official opening ceremony Room 450 Room 300 Rooms 200, 150-A, 150-B and Balcony Room 120 Room J Auditorium 2000 9:30 am Lascaux Meetings From the land to food: review of Children's Rights Day the key questions, problems and Shackles 12 noon expectations. of Memory 2:00 pm Young people From the land to International Meeting on the Children's Rights at the centre food: what is the Alliance central themes of Day: performance of the World Forum situation with the World Alliance by Compagnie Ô on Human Rights regard to rights of Cities Against to land and food? Poverty 6:30 pm Auditorium 2000: Official opening ceremony Tuesday 29th June Identities and minorities: living and acting together in diversity Room 450 Room 300 Room 200 Room 150-A Room 150-B Room 120 Room GH Room BC 9:30 am Cities and the Lascaux Meetings People, citizenship, Indigenous Access to citizenship Poor children Reflecting upon Global Crisis: how Agricultural equality, identity: peoples’ right and strengthening and single parent and building can human rights development can difference of access borders in Europe: families: when the citizenship in be protected? and the reduction and diversity to land towards better inte- exercise of family countries with of poverty.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Civil Procedure
    R. L. R. Comparative Civil Procedure Peter GOTTWALD＊ I. General functions and aims of comparative law The comparison of legal systems is a special method within jurisprudence. With regard to its important functions it is world-wide also regarded as a separate branch of jurisprudence.1) There is no branch of science which may base its knowledge only on ideas and ndings being born within national boundaries. This is particularly true within our modern world of globalisation. Comparative law then leads not only to a better knowledge of foreign law but is also corresponding to the internationalisation of law and jurisprudence and the globalisation of politics, of trade, commerce and private life style. Jurisprudence is not just the science of interpreting national laws, statutes, legal principles, rules and standards. It should comprise the search for models of preventing and solving social con icts within a world-wide society. In looking what has been done beyond the own borders comparative law offers incentives and a broader scope of models of solving a problem that could be and have been developed within national boundaries. Lawyers of all legal systems of the world are by far more imaginative than one lawyer could think up within his short life. Comparative law thus may be an ecoledeverite, enrich the stock of possible solutions , and moreover offer the chance to nd better solutions for the particular time and the particular country than by restricting to local or national doctrinal disputes. If you take this earnestly, comparative law is an exciting intellectual adventure, calling for a maximum of phantasy and of discipline.
    [Show full text]
  • "Headscarves Ban": Intolerance Or Necessity?, 40 J. Marshall L. Rev. 235 (2006)
    UIC Law Review Volume 40 Issue 1 Article 5 Fall 2006 The French "Headscarves Ban": Intolerance or Necessity?, 40 J. Marshall L. Rev. 235 (2006) Reuven (Ruvi) Ziegler Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.uic.edu/lawreview Part of the Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, Constitutional Law Commons, Education Law Commons, European Law Commons, Human Rights Law Commons, International Humanitarian Law Commons, International Law Commons, Law and Politics Commons, Law and Race Commons, Law and Society Commons, Legislation Commons, Privacy Law Commons, Religion Law Commons, and the Transnational Law Commons Recommended Citation Reuven (Ruvi) Ziegler, The French "Headscarves Ban": Intolerance or Necessity?, 40 J. Marshall L. Rev. 235 (2006) https://repository.law.uic.edu/lawreview/vol40/iss1/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by UIC Law Open Access Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in UIC Law Review by an authorized administrator of UIC Law Open Access Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE FRENCH "HEADSCARVES BAN": INTOLERANCE OR NECESSITY? REUVEN (Ruvi) ZIEGLER* I. PROLOGUE The interplay between state and religion stands at the core of the public discourse in many Western democracies. One of the important institutions where this interplay faces a daily legal and practical challenge is in public schools,' where the future generation's character is highly influenced, values and culture are taught and absorbed, and long-term personal relations with colleagues begin their journey. In the past few years, ethnic tension in French public schools has risen, following the National Assembly's decision to adopt legislation prohibiting the wearing of "ostentatious religious symbols" by students, which went into effect on September 1, 2004.2 The aim of this article is to examine the French legislation in a broader context.
    [Show full text]
  • Legal Harmonisation from the Perspective of the Economic Analysis of Law
    Legal Harmonisation from the PerspectiVe of the Economic Analysis of LaW M ICHAEL G. F AURE * I. Introduction In this paper, I address the potential contribution of the economic analysis of laW to the debate concerning the need for the harmonisation of private laW in Europe. The focus of this paper will indeed mainly be on this harmonisation issue. Indeed, one WaY in which an economic analysis can be useful for the studY of European integration is that economics has focused a lot of attention on the division of competences within federal systems. This is a topic which, from a European legal perspectiVe, is obviouslY releVant to the subsidiarity principle. From an economic perspectiVe, the question which is addressed in the economics of federalism is what the optimal leVel would be for speci fi c types of regulation. In this paper, I argue that this literature is highlY useful also for addressing the harmonisation debate with respect to private law. In the paper, I address the desirabilitY of the harmonisation of private laW from an economic angle. Economists haVe indeed paid much attention to the po- tential goals, functions and economic effects of a harmonisation of laW 1 . * Institute for Transnational Legal Research (METRO), Maastricht, and Rotterdam Insti- tute for LaW and Economics (RKE), Rotterdam, The Netherlands. 1 This paper builds on earlier research in which harmonisation efforts Were analysed from an economic angle with respect to environmental laW (Michael F AURE , Harmonization of Environmental LaW and Market Integration:
    [Show full text]