DOCSLIB.ORG

Inspection Report Anchorsholme Primary

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Inspection Report Anchorsholme Primary INSPECTION REPORT ANCHORSHOLME PRIMARY SCHOOL Thornton Cleveleys, Blackpool LEA area: Blackpool Unique reference number: 119249 Headteacher: Mr Michael Bryan Reporting inspector: Mr Tim Boyce 20932 Dates of inspection: May 27th - 29th 2002 Inspection number: 243315 Short inspection carried out under section 10 of the School Inspections Act 1996 © Crown copyright 2002 This report may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that all extracts quoted are reproduced verbatim without adaptation and on condition that the source and date thereof are stated. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the School Inspections Act 1996, the school must provide a copy of this report and/or its summary free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. INFORMATION ABOUT THE SCHOOL Type of school: Primary School category: Community Age range of pupils: 4-11 years Gender of pupils: Mixed School address: Anchorsholme Primary School Eastpines Drive Thornton Cleveleys Blackpool Lancashire Postcode: FY5 3RX Telephone number: 01253 855215 Fax number: 01253 863927 Appropriate authority: The Governing Body Name of chair of governors: Mr Michael Morton Date of previous inspection: June 30th 1997 Anchorsholme Primary School - 3 INFORMATION ABOUT THE INSPECTION TEAM Team members 20932 Tim Boyce Registered inspector 19365 Gordon Stockley Lay inspector 25352 Geraldine Taujanskas Team inspector 22704 Garry Williams Team inspector The inspection contractor was: Evenlode Associates Ltd 6 Abbey Close Alcester Warwickshire B49 5QW Any concerns or complaints about the inspection or the report should be raised with the inspection contractor. Complaints that are not satisfactorily resolved by the contractor should be raised with OFSTED by writing to: The Complaints Manager Inspection Quality Division The Office for Standards in Education Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE Anchorsholme Primary School - 4 REPORT CONTENTS Page PART A: SUMMARY OF THE REPORT 6 - 10 Information about the school How good the school is What the school does well What could be improved How the school has improved since its last inspection Standards Pupils’ attitudes and values Teaching and learning Other aspects of the school How well the school is led and managed Parents’ and carers’ views of the school PART B: COMMENTARY WHAT THE SCHOOL DOES WELL 11 - 15 WHAT COULD BE IMPROVED 15 WHAT SHOULD THE SCHOOL DO TO IMPROVE FURTHER? 15 PART C: SCHOOL DATA AND INDICATORS 16 - 19 Anchorsholme Primary School - 5 PART A: SUMMARY OF THE REPORT INFORMATION ABOUT THE SCHOOL Anchorsholme Primary School is a much larger than average school, providing full time education for 574 pupils, aged from 4 to 11 years. The school is very popular and is oversubscribed. Whilst some pupils travel from further afield, the majority of pupils come from the predominantly private housing close to the school. A lower than average number of pupils is eligible for free school meals. The social and economic circumstances of the majority of parents are above average. Almost all pupils have a white United Kingdom heritage and only nine pupils come from other ethnic groups. Six of these pupils have English as an additional language, but none of them are at an early stage of English language acquisition. Approximately thirteen per cent of the pupils have special educational needs. This is a lower proportion than the national average. The majority of these pupils have minor learning difficulties, but a small number have more serious needs, including two pupils with physical disabilities, one with hearing impairment, three with speech and communication difficulties and nine with emotional and behavioral difficulties. One pupil has a statement of special educational needs. Assessments administered by the school, and inspection evidence, show that attainment on entry to the reception classes is above the local and national average and that the school has a higher than average proportion of average pupils. HOW GOOD THE SCHOOL IS This is an excellent school, with many significant strengths, that serves the local community and the pupils exceedingly well, and is consistently seeking new and exciting ways to improve its provision and further raise standards. The head teacher and the leadership team provide the school with excellent leadership and management, and they are very well supported in this by senior managers, co-ordinators and the governing body. The quality of teaching is very good overall, and often excellent and the curriculum, which is greatly enhanced by excellent links with the local community and numerous partner institutions and agencies, is broad, balanced, rich and relevant. With these excellent factors combining together, pupils make very good progress and achieve very high academic and personal standards. When all these very positive factors are weighed against broadly average costs, the school provides excellent value for money. What the school does well · Pupils attain very high standards in almost all subjects of the National Curriculum. · Pupils, who are developing as mature, independent and imaginative citizens, exhibit excellent behaviour and forge excellent relationships with staff and their classmates. · Excellent leadership and management have created an environment based on success, in which pupils and staff thrive. · Very good, and often excellent, teaching enables all pupils to achieve their full potential and do their very best. · A broad, balanced, relevant and stimulating curriculum, greatly enhanced by very effective links with the local community and numerous partner institutions, provides many exciting opportunities for pupils and staff to develop. What could be improved · There are no significant areas for improvement. The areas for improvement will form the basis of the governors’ action plan. HOW THE SCHOOL HAS IMPROVED SINCE ITS LAST INSPECTION There has been very good improvement since the school was last inspected in July 1997. All of the Key Issues identified in the previous inspection report have been fully resolved. The school has continued to support the development of its monitoring and evaluation procedures, which are now excellent, with co- ordinators and link co-ordinators playing a full and active part in the management of their areas of responsibility. Pupils are now given many very good opportunities to develop their drafting and redrafting skills in various extended writing contexts and good quality reading areas have now been developed in the reception classes. Anchorsholme Primary School - 6 There have been many other significant improvements in the school’s overall provision. Academic standards have improved in English, mathematics and science and most pupils now attain well above average standards by the end of Year 2 and very high standards by the end of Year 6. This is a much better situation than that previously reported, when standards were judged to be above average. There have been some amazing improvements in the quality of the provision for information and communication technology (ICT), including the creation of a superbly equipped computer suite. As a result, standards in ICT, whilst still above expectations at the end of Year 2, are now well above by the end of Year 6. Pupils are now achieving very high standards in most other subjects. Standards of personal development have also improved, with behaviour, attitudes to work and pupils’ personal and social development all moving up from very good to excellent. The curriculum, which was previously judged to be good is now excellent and, in addition to being broad, balanced, and relevant, is greatly enhanced by excellent links with the community and with numerous partner institutions. This is having a very positive impact on pupils’ learning. The leadership and management of the school, which were previously graded very good, are now considered to be excellent, with the strong, enlightened leadership of the head teacher and the leadership team resulting in consistent, coherent and imaginative management which is enabling this already excellent school to improve still further. Given the complete lack of complacency and the burning desire for continued success that exists in the school, the potential for further improvement is very good. STANDARDS The table shows the standards achieved by pupils at the end of Year 6 based on average point scores in National Curriculum tests compared with Performance in: all schools similar schools Key 1999 2000 2001 2001 very high A* well above average A English A C A* A* above average B average C Mathematics A B A* A* below average D well below average E Science A A A* A* very low E* The results of National Curriculum assessments administered in 2001 indicated that, when compared with all pupils nationally, and with pupils in similar schools, (those with between eight per cent and twenty per cent of pupils eligible for free school meals), standards were very high in English, mathematics and science. This means that the standards attained placed the school in the top five per cent of schools nationally. Standards in all three subjects were consistently well above average in 1998 and 1999, but standards in English and mathematics dipped in 2000 because the cohort had a higher than average proportion of pupils with special educational needs. Inspection evidence indicates that the standards achieved by the current Year 6 group are very high in English, mathematics and science. Pupils are making rapid progress in ICT and the majority of pupils in Year 6 are attaining well above average standards. Standards in other National Curriculum subjects are generally very high, with particular strengths being identified in the teaching of history and design and technology (DT). Standards in religious education (RE) exceed the expectations of the locally agreed syllabus. Children learn very effectively in the Foundation Stage and almost all achieve the required standards by the time they finish their Reception year, with a significant proportion of children exceeding them.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Neighbourhoods in England Rated E for Green Space, Friends of The
    Neighbourhoods in England rated E for Green Space, Friends of the Earth, September 2020 Neighbourhood_Name Local_authority Marsh Barn & Widewater Adur Wick & Toddington Arun Littlehampton West and River Arun Bognor Regis Central Arun Kirkby Central Ashfield Washford & Stanhope Ashford Becontree Heath Barking and Dagenham Becontree West Barking and Dagenham Barking Central Barking and Dagenham Goresbrook & Scrattons Farm Barking and Dagenham Creekmouth & Barking Riverside Barking and Dagenham Gascoigne Estate & Roding Riverside Barking and Dagenham Becontree North Barking and Dagenham New Barnet West Barnet Woodside Park Barnet Edgware Central Barnet North Finchley Barnet Colney Hatch Barnet Grahame Park Barnet East Finchley Barnet Colindale Barnet Hendon Central Barnet Golders Green North Barnet Brent Cross & Staples Corner Barnet Cudworth Village Barnsley Abbotsmead & Salthouse Barrow-in-Furness Barrow Central Barrow-in-Furness Basildon Central & Pipps Hill Basildon Laindon Central Basildon Eversley Basildon Barstable Basildon Popley Basingstoke and Deane Winklebury & Rooksdown Basingstoke and Deane Oldfield Park West Bath and North East Somerset Odd Down Bath and North East Somerset Harpur Bedford Castle & Kingsway Bedford Queens Park Bedford Kempston West & South Bedford South Thamesmead Bexley Belvedere & Lessness Heath Bexley Erith East Bexley Lesnes Abbey Bexley Slade Green & Crayford Marshes Bexley Lesney Farm & Colyers East Bexley Old Oscott Birmingham Perry Beeches East Birmingham Castle Vale Birmingham Birchfield East Birmingham
    [Show full text]
  • United Utilities Report on the Flooding of 22Nd / 23Rd November 2017 Date : August 2018
    United Utilities Report on the flooding of 22nd / 23rd November 2017 Date : August 2018 Page | 1 1.0 Background to the flooding Event 22nd – 23rd November 2017 Rainfall There had been considerable rainfall, leading up to the significant rainfall on the Wednesday evening, which ultimately led to the flooding in the north Blackpool and Wyre areas. The weather front first hit the Fylde coast, but also spread northwards with similar rainfall also being experienced in the Lancaster patch, to the north of the Blackpool / Fleetwood area. In order to understand the extent of the rainfall, there is a need to look at a 48 hour period from Tuesday 21st November through to the early hours of Thursday 23rd November 2018. A rainfall event that took until Sunday 26th November, to drain down both the main Fylde Tunnel system, and the local watercourse systems on the northern Fylde Coast Peninsula. Analysis of local raingauge information highlighted that the the greatest amount of rainfall, fell over the northwestern Blackpool / Wyre area, with a slightly lower rainfall event in the southern areas of Blackpool. The Fleetwood raingauge information proved to be the most representative of the impact upon these northern Fylde Coast area. Rainfall Intensity 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 (mm/hr) Intensity Rainfall 5 0 20/11/2017… 20/11/2017… 21/11/2017… 21/11/2017… 21/11/2017… 21/11/2017… 21/11/2017… 21/11/2017… 22/11/2017… 22/11/2017… 22/11/2017… 22/11/2017… 22/11/2017… 22/11/2017… 23/11/2017… 23/11/2017… 23/11/2017… 23/11/2017… 23/11/2017… 23/11/2017… 24/11/2017… RG01 RG03 RG04 Date / Time Figure 1.0 : RG04 Fleetwood raingauge, RG03 Poulton raingauge, RG01 Airport raingauge Modelling reviews of the rainfall that fell, highlighted that the volume that fell, in the 48 hour period was equivalent to a 1 in 64 year rainfall event.
    [Show full text]
  • Submission to the Boundary Commission for England 2013 Review North West Region Greater Manchester and Lancashire
    Submission to the Boundary Commission for England 2013 Review North West Region Greater Manchester and Lancashire Andrew Teale December 4, 2011 Abstract This submission disagrees with and presents a counter-proposal to the Boundary Commission for England’s proposals for new parliamentary con- stituency boundaries in Greater Manchester and Lancashire. The counter- proposal allocates seven whole constituencies to the boroughs of Stockport, Tameside and Oldham, nine whole constituencies to the boroughs of Man- chester, Salford and Trafford, and twenty-four whole constituencies to the rest of the region. No comment is made on the Boundary Commission’s proposals for the rest of the North West region or for any other region. Contents 1 Introduction2 1.1 The statutory criteria.........................2 1.2 Splitting of wards...........................3 2 Theoretical entitlements4 3 Southern Greater Manchester5 3.1 Manchester, Salford and Trafford..................5 3.2 Oldham, Stockport and Tameside.................. 10 4 Lancashire and Northern Greater Manchester 14 4.1 Crossing the boundary between Greater Manchester and Lancashire 16 4.2 Rochdale................................ 17 4.3 Bolton, Bury, Wigan and Rossendale................ 18 4.4 South Lancashire........................... 22 4.5 East Lancashire............................ 23 4.6 North Lancashire........................... 24 4.7 Summary................................ 25 5 Closing remarks 28 1 1 Introduction This document is my submission to the 2013 Review of Parliamentary constit- uency boundaries. I should first introduce myself. I am the editor and webmaster of the Lo- cal Elections Archive Project (http://www.andrewteale.me.uk/leap/), the in- ternet’s largest freely available collection of British local election results. I have been for some years a contributor to election-related web forums, and this submission is based on material originally posted on the Vote UK forum (http://www.vote-2007.co.uk/) and in some cases modified in the light of comments made.
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda Cabinet
    Agenda Cabinet Date Wednesday, 18 September 2013 at 7:00 pm Venue Reception Room, Town Hall LEADER: COUNCILLOR DAVID EAVES Membership: Councillor Portfolio Karen Buckley Finance and Resources Susan Fazackerley Leisure and Culture Dr Trevor Fiddler Planning and Development Cheryl Little Social Wellbeing Albert Pounder Customer & Operational Services Thomas Threlfall Environment & Partnerships Public Platform To hear representations from members of the public in accordance with Cabinet procedure rules Procedural Items Pages 1 Declarations of Interest: Any member needing advice on Declarations of 1 Interest should contact the Monitoring Officer before the meeting. 2 Confirmation of Minutes: To confirm the minutes of the previous meetings 1 held on 26 June and 2 July 2013 as correct record attached at the end of the agenda. Urgent Items 3 Urgent Items (The Chairman will be asked to indicate whether or not he 1 accepts that any additional item should be considered by the Cabinet as a matter of urgency, in accordance with section 100 of the Local Government Act 1972 (as amended). 1 Items for Decision 4 Policy Development Scrutiny Committee – Recommendations 4 - 11 5 Community Focus Scrutiny Committee – Recommendations 12 - 19 6 Revenues and Benefits Service 20 - 24 7 Boxes 2 Bins – Evaluation and Outcomes 25 - 38 Duty to Co-operate: Memorandum of Understanding between Blackpool 8 Council, Fylde Borough Council, Wyre Borough Council and Lancashire County 39 - 59 Council 9 Timetable for Developing Budget Proposals 2014/15 60 - 63 10 Scrap Metal Dealers Act 2013 64 - 69 11 Part Roof Replacement St Anne’s Swimming Pool 70 - 76 12 Fylde Water Management Partnership 77 - 80 13 Business Rates – Write-Off of Uncollectable Debts 81 - 88 Contact: Lyndsey Lacey - Telephone: (01253) 658504 - Email: [email protected] © Fylde Borough Council copyright 2013 You may re-use this document/publication (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Flood Risk Management Strategy 2021 to 2027 Accessible
    Consultaton Draf Local Flood Risk Management Strategy for Lancashire 2021 - 2027 Executve Summary In 2010 the Government introduced the Flood and Water Management Act to give new powers and responsibilites to local authorites to beter manage the risk of local fooding in their areas. Under this, County and Unitary Councils became ‘Lead Local Flood Authorites’ (LLFA). One of the new dutes of a LLFA is to produce a Local Flood Risk Management Strategy (LFRMS). This Strategy sets out how we intend to work with partners and our businesses and communites to manage the risk of fooding in the Lancashire up to 2027. It is of interest to all who live and work in Lancashire, as managing the risk of fooding requires acton by everyone, as well as to organisatons that have specifc responsibilites for managing food risk in the area such as the Environment Agency, Local Authorites and the Water and Sewerage Company. Since the devastatng fooding witnessed across Lancashire in December 2015 and other events since, it has been a priority to improve resilience to fooding as part of business planning. Considerable progress has already been made working with partners to secure funding for several large food alleviaton and coastal defence schemes, reducing risk to thousands of propertes. This Strategy sets the course for contnuing this momentum, identfying where resources and eforts are to be concentrated so we can confdently say as we are contnuing to improve our understanding of risk whilst delivering schemes and supportng our businesses and communites to beter protect and improve food resilience for the people of Lancashire.
    [Show full text]
  • Saints Anchorsholme Parish Profile Final
    Parish Profile 1 Contents 1. Dear Potential Applicant………………………………………………………….3 2. Diocesan Introduction……………………………………………………………..5 3. Diocesan Vision……………………………………………………………………6 4. We look after you…………………………………………………………………..7 5. Executive Summary……………………………………………………………….8 6. The Parish and Wider Community……………………………………………….9 7. The Church Community………………………………………………………….13 8. The Church Buildings…………………………………………………………….16 9. The Church Finances…………………………………………………………….18 10. Our schools………………………………………………………………………..20 11. Our links into the wider community…………………………………………….21 12. Map of the area………………………………………………………………… 22 13. Our Vision………………………………………………………………………….23 14. What we offer………………………………………………………………… ...29 15. Who is God calling?..................................................................................... 31 Appendices: 1. Parish publicity leaflets……………………………………………………..……32 2. Parish dashboard…………………………………………………………………36 2 Dear Potential Applicant “” ... Christ has set us free to live a free life ... “” Galatians 5: 1 The Parish of All Saints, Anchorsholme is inviting you to consider applying to be our Vicar. We are looking for is someone who shares our passion and our beliefs, which are: God is love, the love that everybody is looking for and which He calls us to share with others. God calls us to be a church without walls, serving our community, especially the poor and disadvantaged, to reach the disconnected by coming alongside them, not in judgement of them but to help them. We are called to show the kindness and compassion of Jesus, who is the light of the world, in all we do. Jesus will return at any moment, so what we do now and the mission of the church have never been more urgent and every day offers opportunities to make a difference. The Holy Spirit works with us as we surrender to Him in the work of leading souls from the gates of hell to the doors of heaven.
    [Show full text]
  • Lancashire Coastal Way ! ! ! 6 a Map 1 ! !
    LANCASHIRE Coastal Way The Coastal way is a 137 mile footpath following the coastline between Merseyside and Cumbria. The Lancashire coastline, much of which is of international ornithological interest comprises a variety of landscapes from the distinctive limestone scenery of Arnside / Silverdale Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty, through grazed saltmarshes and agricultural land, the seaside resorts of Morecambe and Blackpool and the Fylde coast, as well as the major river estuaries of the Lune, Wyre and Ribble. Walking the Coastal Way will enable you to relive history as well as observe todayÊs coastal activities. See the small creeks home to early inhabitants and the relics of coastal fortifications and early Christianity. Witness the evidence of early industries based on iron, salt and limestone, alongside the modern businesses of British Aerospace, Nuclear Electric, British Gas and ICI. The busy harbours at Fleetwood, Heysham and Glasson Dock contrast sharply with the holiday atmosphere of the seaside resorts. Above all the coastal way provides spectacular views of Morecambe Bay, the Bowland Fells and the Lake District, and the opportunity, particularly in spring and autumn, to observe the large variety of waders and seabirds for which the Lancashire coast and estuaries are internationally important. ENJOY YOUR WALK: But please remember to follow these simple requests: • KEEP TO THE COASTAL WAY PATH. • FASTEN ALL GATES BEHIND YOU. • KEEP YOUR DOG ON A LEAD. • TAKE YOUR LITTER HOME WITH YOU. HORSES AND BIKES ARE ONLY ALLOWED ON BRIDLEWAYS. THESE ARE MARKED BY BLUE ARROWS. BIRD SPOTTING Birds that you might see from the path include: oystercatcher pink-footed goose redshank eider grey plover curlew pintail dunlin golden plover lapwing goldeneye red-breasted merganer turnstone shelduck cormorant knot bar-tailed godwit SILVERDALE SilverdaleÊs charms were first made public by Elizabeth Gaskell, the Victorian novelist who has since had the main hall in the village named after her.
    [Show full text]
  • Generationpostura Join
    London Oratory School | Abacus Belsize Primary School | Abbet Gates Primary School | Abbey Hulton Primary School | Abbey Lane Junior & Infant School | Abbey Meadows Primary School | Abbey Park Primary Academy | Abbey Road Primary School | Abbots Hill School | Abbots Lea Sen School | Abbots Primary School | Abbotsholme School | Abbotsmede Community Primary School | Abbott Primary School | Abbs Cross Academy And Arts College | Abernethy Primary School | Abertillery Primary School |Abingdon Primary School | Abington Vale Primary School | Aboyne Primary School | Abraham Darby Academy | Abraham Guest Academy | Abraham Moss Community School | Accrington Green Haworth | Ace Place Nursery | Achaleven Primary School | Ackton Pastures Primary | Acorn Park Nursery & Kindergarten | Acorn Park School | Acorns Primary School | Acorns School | Acre Rigg Academy | Acs International School Ltd | Acton Park Primary School | Adderley Children’s Centre | Adderley Primary School | Addey & Stanhope School | Addingham Primary School | Addington School | Adlington County Primary School | Adswood Primary School | Aerodrome Primary School | Airedale Academy | Alanbrooke School | Albert Village Community Primary School | Albion Primary School | Alcester Grammar School | Aldborough Primary School | Alder Community High School | Alderman Bolton Primary School | Alderman Jacobs School | Alderman Payne Primary School | Alderman White School | Aldermaston C of E Primary School | Aldersbrook Primary School | Alderton Junior School | Alderwood School | Aldro School | Aldworth
    [Show full text]
  • UUW PR14 Reconciliation Update (July 2019)
    United Utilities Water Ltd PR14 Reconciliation update July 2019 Copyright © United Utilities Water Limited 2019 1 Background and purpose of this document During 2018, all water companies, including United Utilities, published PR14 reconciliation submissions which set out: • How they had performed against the PR14 incentive regimes for the first three years of the AMP6 period and how they expected to perform in the final two years of the period • How this performance would be reflected in AMP7 revenue and the opening RCV adjustments, calculated using the relevant PR14 rulebook and applied through the PR19 process • How the precedent from performance in the AMP6 period, demonstrated the deliverability of the proposed package of AMP7 performance and expenditure. Ofwat published its initial Assessment of Plans feedback on these submissions in January 2019. The feedback on UUW’s submission is available via this link. As part of this feedback Ofwat assessed UUW as “B”, which was the highest achievable rating and stated that “Overall, United Utilities' business plan demonstrates high quality accounting for past delivery, with sufficient and convincing evidence both in support of PR14 reconciliations and on deliverability of the 2020-25 plan given past performance”. “In the round, we do not have concerns with the evidence for deliverability for the 2020-25 plan”. “There is sufficient and convincing evidence for seven out of eight PR14 reconciliation areas and insufficient evidence for ODIs. There is only a marginal difference (within 0.05% of 2019/20 revenue) between expected and proposed reconciliations. In the round we consider that this supports the accounting for past delivery test area score”.
    [Show full text]
  • Name of Deceased
    Date before which Name of Deceased Address, description and date of death of Names, addresses and descriptions of Persons to whom notices of claims are to be notices of claims (Surname first) Deceased given and names, in parentheses, of Personal Representatives to be given BARRABLE, Gertrude "The Chalet", Forge Hill, Aldington, Kent, Malkin Cullis & Sumption, Grand Buildings, Trafalgar Square, London WC2N llth August 1981 Mary. Spinster. 24th February 1981. 5HJ (Ref. RMP). (Dudley William Bonney and Joan Margaret Payne.) (147) BOLTON, Joseph Clifford "Ronford", Hereford Road, Colne, Lan- Steels, Ford & Newton, 13 Carr Road, Nelson, Lancashire, Solicitors, or 15th August 1981 cashire, Insurance Broker (Retired). 25th Trustee Department, Yorkshire Bank Limited, 20 Merrion Way, Leeds (338) April 1981. LS2 8NZ. CRADDOCK, Doris Mary Nazareth House, Harlestone Road, Northamp- Dennis Faulkner & Alsop, 32 Market Square, Northampton NN1 2DQ. 10th August 1981 ton, Widow. 19th May 1981. (Clarice Fairey, John Storton and Joan Bell.) (339) BEEBY, Cecil Walter ... 52 Booth Lane South, Northampton, Bank Dennis Faulkner & Alsop, Beethoven House, 32 Market Square, Northampton 31st August 1981 Official (Retired), llth May 1981. NN1 2DQ. (Myrtle Grace Beeby, John. Edward Beeby and Archibald (340) Geoffrey Gee.) TICEHURST, Leslie John Carters Farm, Gun Hill, Horam, Heathfield, Andrews & Bennett, Southerden House, Market Street, Hailsham, East Sussex. 2nd September 1981 East Sussex, Farmer. 29th December 1980. (Alice Emily Smith.) (341) FOSTER, Edith Annie ... 84 Mill Road, Bozeat, Wellingborough, Anderson-Davis & Metcalfe, 21 Victoria Street, St. Albans, Herts, Solicitors. 15th August 1981 Northamptonshire, Widow. 21st March (Jane Elisabeth Ellory.) 062) 1981. PEARSON, Bessie Maud... 135A Highlands Boulevard, Leigh-on-Sea, Bramsdon & Childs, 10 High Street, Portsmouth PO1 2LW.
    [Show full text]
  • Intensive Catchment Wide Survey of Fios and Related Data
    Intensive catchment wide survey of FIOs and related data Carl Stapleton on behalf of the research team www.shef.ac.uk/c2c Field survey design Sampling overview • HSPF - sub catchment structure – Low & high flow FIO characterisation of selected subcatchments identified by model team, with responsive sampling • Infoworks network models – Temporal variability of FIO flux from intermittent storm discharges (CSOs, storm tanks) over single events to clarify ‘event mean concentration’, responsive manual sampling augmented by autosamplers – Final effluent and crude sewage quality Sampling overview 2 • 1D/2D/3D Numerical river & coastal hydrodynamic & WQ models – Current velocity and direction • ADCPs • Drogues – Travel time and connection • Microbial tracer surveys – Water & Sediment Quality • Vertical WQ profiles – discrete samples & sondes • Bed sediment samples • Riverine & sewage input quality/fluxes – Mircrobial decay • marine and freshwaters; funded by EA Catchment field team deployment • July – Sept, Oct 2012 – (1st week: equipment installation) • CREH Laboratory: – E. coli, presumptive & confirmed enterococci, turbidity, pH, conductivity, salinity. Riverine sample points Site River Location 101 Ribble EA Samlesbury gauge 102 Ribble Ribchester 103 Ribble Mitton Bridge 104 Ribble Sawley Bridge 109 Hodder Lower Hodder Bridge 111 Loud ptc Hodder 112 Langden Brook ptc Hodder 115 Bashall Brook ptc Ribble, Edisford Ln 116 Swanside Beck ptc Ribble (A59) 118 Skirden Beck Bolton-by-Bowland 119 Stock Beck ptc Ribble 120 Calder Whalley flow station 127 Pendle Water Barden Weir 140 Wigglesworth Beck ptc Ribble 141 Colne Water u/s Colne WwTW 142 Ribble Edisford 143 Easington Brook ptc Hodder 144 Wanlass Water ptc Pendle Water 201 Dawen EA Blue Bridge gauge 203 Darwen d/s Hollins Mill 204 Darwen d/s Darwen WwTW 205 Old Briggs Brook 501 Lostock Ulnes Walton Lane 601 Yarrow Fishery Bridge Croston 26 sample points 701 Douglas Wanes Blades Bridge 801 Three Pools Black Brook at A570 18 sites same as 2002 apportionment study.
    [Show full text]
  • Cumulative Impact Assessment 2021
    Cumulative Impact Assessment 2021 Page 1 of 12 Contents Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 3 Cumulative Impact Assessment 2021 ................................................................................................................................................. 4 Conclusion ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 10 Page 2 of 12 Introduction Section 5A Licensing Act 2003 allows a licensing authority to publish a cumulative impact assessment if it considers that the number of premises licences/club premises certificates in respect of premises in one or more parts of its area described in the assessment is such that it is likely that it would be inconsistent with the authority’s duty under section 4(1) to grant any premises licences/club premises certificates in respect of premises in that part or those parts. Cumulative impact is the potential impact on the promotion of the licensing objectives of a number of licensed premises concentrated in one area. Before publishing a cumulative impact assessment, the licensing authority must consult with the following: . Police . Fire and Rescue Authority . Public Health . Representatives of premises licence and club premises certificate holders issued by the authority . Representatives
    [Show full text]