DOCSLIB.ORG

Algebraic Geometry

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Algebraic Geometry Algebraic Geometry J.S. Milne Version 5.21 March 31, 2011 These notes are an introduction to the theory of algebraic varieties. In contrast to most such accounts they study abstract algebraic varieties, and not just subvarieties of affine and projective space. This approach leads more naturally into scheme theory. BibTeX information @misc{milneAG, author={Milne, James S.}, title={Algebraic Geometry (v5.21)}, year={2011}, note={Available at www.jmilne.org/math/}, pages={258} } v2.01 (August 24, 1996). First version on the web. v3.01 (June 13, 1998). v4.00 (October 30, 2003). Fixed errors; many minor revisions; added exercises; added two sections/chapters; 206 pages. v5.00 (February 20, 2005). Heavily revised; most numbering changed; 227 pages. v5.10 (March 19, 2008). Minor fixes; TEXstyle changed, so page numbers changed; 241 pages. v5.20 (September 14, 2009). Minor corrections; revised Chapters 1, 11, 16; 245 pages. v5.21 (March 31, 2011). Minor changes; changed TEXstyle; 258 pages. Available at www.jmilne.org/math/ Please send comments and corrections to me at the address on my web page. The photograph is of Lake Sylvan, New Zealand. Copyright c 1996, 1998, 2003, 2005, 2008, 2009, 2011 J.S. Milne. Single paper copies for noncommercial personal use may be made without explicit permis- sion from the copyright holder. Contents Contents 3 Notations 6; Prerequisites 6; References 6; Acknowledgements 6 1 Preliminaries 11 Rings and algebras 11; Ideals 11; Noetherian rings 13; Unique factorization 15; Polynomial rings 17; Integrality 18; Direct limits (summary) 21; Rings of fractions 22; Tensor Prod- ucts 25; Categories and functors 28; Algorithms for polynomials 30; Exercises 36 2 Algebraic Sets 37 Definition of an algebraic set 37; The Hilbert basis theorem 38; The Zariski topology 39; The Hilbert Nullstellensatz 40; The correspondence between algebraic sets and ideals 41; Finding the radical of an ideal 44; The Zariski topology on an algebraic set 44; The coor- dinate ring of an algebraic set 45; Irreducible algebraic sets 46; Dimension 48; Exercises 50 3 Affine Algebraic Varieties 53 Ringed spaces 53; The ringed space structure on an algebraic set 55; Morphisms of ringed spaces 58; Affine algebraic varieties 58; The category of affine algebraic varieties 59; Explicit description of morphisms of affine varieties 61; Subvarieties 63; Properties of the regular map defined by specm.˛/ 64; Affine space without coordinates 65; Exercises 66 4 Algebraic Varieties 69 Algebraic prevarieties 69; Regular maps 70; Algebraic varieties 71; Maps from varieties to affine varieties 72; Subvarieties 73; Prevarieties obtained by patching 74; Products of vari- eties 74; The separation axiom revisited 79; Fibred products 82; Dimension 83; Birational equivalence 84; Dominant maps 85; Algebraic varieties as a functors 85; Exercises 87 5 Local Study 89 Tangent spaces to plane curves 89; Tangent cones to plane curves 91; The local ring at a m point on a curve 91; Tangent spaces of subvarieties of A 92; The differential of a regular map 94; Etale maps 95; Intrinsic definition of the tangent space 97; Nonsingular points 100; Nonsingularity and regularity 101; Nonsingularity and normality 102; Etale neigh- bourhoods 103; Smooth maps 105; Dual numbers and derivations 106; Tangent cones 109; Exercises 111 6 Projective Varieties 113 n n n Algebraic subsets of P 113; The Zariski topology on P 116; Closed subsets of A and n n P 117; The hyperplane at infinity 117; P is an algebraic variety 118; The homogeneous 3 n coordinate ring of a subvariety of P 120; Regular functions on a projective variety 121; Morphisms from projective varieties 122; Examples of regular maps of projective vari- eties 123; Projective space without coordinates 128; Grassmann varieties 128; Bezout’s theorem 132; Hilbert polynomials (sketch) 133; Exercises 134 7 Complete varieties 135 Definition and basic properties 135; Projective varieties are complete 137; Elimination theory 138; The rigidity theorem 140; Theorems of Chow 141; Nagata’s Embedding The- orem 142; Exercises 142 8 Finite Maps 143 Definition and basic properties 143; Noether Normalization Theorem 147; Zariski’s main theorem 148; The base change of a finite map 150; Proper maps 150; Exercises 152 9 Dimension Theory 153 Affine varieties 153; Projective varieties 160 10 Regular Maps and Their Fibres 163 Constructible sets 163; Orbits of group actions 166; The fibres of morphisms 168; The fibres of finite maps 170; Flat maps 171; Lines on surfaces 172; Stein factorization 178; Exercises 178 11 Algebraic spaces; geometry over an arbitrary field 179 Preliminaries 179; Affine algebraic spaces 183; Affine algebraic varieties. 184; Algebraic spaces; algebraic varieties. 185; Local study 190; Projective varieties. 191; Complete varieties. 192; Normal varieties; Finite maps. 192; Dimension theory 192; Regular maps and their fibres 192; Algebraic groups 192; Exercises 192 12 Divisors and Intersection Theory 193 Divisors 193; Intersection theory. 194; Exercises 199 13 Coherent Sheaves; Invertible Sheaves 201 Coherent sheaves 201; Invertible sheaves. 203; Invertible sheaves and divisors. 204; Direct images and inverse images of coherent sheaves. 206; Principal bundles 207 14 Differentials (Outline) 209 15 Algebraic Varieties over the Complex Numbers 213 16 Descent Theory 217 Models 217; Fixed fields 217; Descending subspaces of vector spaces 218; Descending subvarieties and morphisms 220; Galois descent of vector spaces 221; Descent data 222; Galois descent of varieties 226; Weil restriction 227; Generic fibres and specialization 227; Rigid descent 228; Weil’s descent theorems 230; Restatement in terms of group actions 232; Faithfully flat descent 234 17 Lefschetz Pencils (Outline) 237 Definition 237 18 Algebraic Schemes and Algebraic Spaces 241 4 A Solutions to the exercises 243 B Annotated Bibliography 251 Index 255 QUESTION: If we try to explain to a layman what algebraic geometry is, it seems to me that the title of the old book of Enriques is still adequate: Geometrical Theory of Equations.... GROTHENDIECK: Yes! but your “layman” should know what a system of algebraic equa- tions is. This would cost years of study to Plato. 5 Notations We use the standard (Bourbaki) notations: N 0;1;2;::: , Z ring of integers, R field D f g D D of real numbers, C field of complex numbers, Fp Z=pZ field of p elements, p a D D D prime number. Given an equivalence relation, Œ denotes the equivalence class containing . A family of elements of a set A indexed by a second set I , denoted .ai /i I , is a function 2 i ai I A. 7! W ! A field k is said to be separably closed if it has no finite separable extensions of degree > 1. We use ksep and kal to denote separable and algebraic closures of k respectively. All rings will be commutative with 1, and homomorphisms of rings are required to map 1 to 1. For a ring A, A is the group of units in A: A a A there exists a b A such that ab 1 : D f 2 j 2 D g We use Gothic (fraktur) letters for ideals: abcmnpqABCMNPQ abcmnpqABCMNPQ X def YX is defined to be Y , or equals Y by definition; D X YX is a subset of Y (not necessarily proper, i.e., X may equal Y ); X YX and Y are isomorphic; X YX and Y are canonically isomorphic (or there is a given or unique isomorphism). ' Prerequisites The reader is assumed to be familiar with the basic objects of algebra, namely, rings, mod- ules, fields, and so on, and with transcendental extensions of fields (FT, Chapter 8). References Atiyah and MacDonald 1969: Introduction to Commutative Algebra, Addison-Wesley. Cox et al. 1992: Varieties, and Algorithms, Springer. FT: Milne, J.S., Fields and Galois Theory, v4.22, 2011. CA: Milne, J.S., Commutative Algebra, v2.22, 2011. Hartshorne 1977: Algebraic Geometry, Springer. Mumford 1999: The Red Book of Varieties and Schemes, Springer. Shafarevich 1994: Basic Algebraic Geometry, Springer. For other references, see the annotated bibliography at the end. Acknowledgements I thank the following for providing corrections and comments on earlier versions of these notes: Sandeep Chellapilla, Rankeya Datta, Umesh V. Dubey, Shalom Feigelstock, B.J. Franklin, Sergei Gelfand, Daniel Gerig, Darij Grinberg, Lucio Guerberoff, Guido Helmers, Christian Hirsch, Cheuk-Man Hwang, Jasper Loy Jiabao, Lars Kindler, Joaquin Rodrigues, Sean Rostami, David Rufino, Hossein Sabzrou, Jyoti Prakash Saha, Tom Savage, Nguyen Quoc Thang, Soli Vishkautsan, Dennis Bouke Westra, and others. 6 Introduction There is almost nothing left to discover in geometry. Descartes, March 26, 1619 Just as the starting point of linear algebra is the study of the solutions of systems of linear equations, n X aij Xj bi ; i 1;:::;m; (1) D D j 1 D the starting point for algebraic geometry is the study of the solutions of systems of polyno- mial equations, fi .X1;:::;Xn/ 0; i 1;:::;m; fi kŒX1;:::;Xn: D D 2 Note immediately one difference between linear equations and polynomial equations: the- orems for linear equations don’t depend on which field k you are working over,1 but those for polynomial equations depend on whether or not k is algebraically closed and (to a lesser extent) whether k has characteristic zero. A better description of algebraic geometry is that it is the study of polynomial functions and the spaces on which they are defined (algebraic varieties), just as topology is the study of continuous functions and the spaces on which they are defined (topological spaces), differential topology the study of infinitely differentiable functions and the spaces on which they are defined (differentiable manifolds), and so on: algebraic geometry regular (polynomial) functions algebraic varieties topology continuous functions topological spaces differential topology differentiable functions differentiable manifolds complex analysis analytic (power series) functions complex manifolds. The approach adopted in this course makes plain the similarities between these different areas of mathematics.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Dimension Theory and Systems of Parameters
    Dimension theory and systems of parameters Krull's principal ideal theorem Our next objective is to study dimension theory in Noetherian rings. There was initially amazement that the results that follow hold in an arbitrary Noetherian ring. Theorem (Krull's principal ideal theorem). Let R be a Noetherian ring, x 2 R, and P a minimal prime of xR. Then the height of P ≤ 1. Before giving the proof, we want to state a consequence that appears much more general. The following result is also frequently referred to as Krull's principal ideal theorem, even though no principal ideals are present. But the heart of the proof is the case n = 1, which is the principal ideal theorem. This result is sometimes called Krull's height theorem. It follows by induction from the principal ideal theorem, although the induction is not quite straightforward, and the converse also needs a result on prime avoidance. Theorem (Krull's principal ideal theorem, strong version, alias Krull's height theorem). Let R be a Noetherian ring and P a minimal prime ideal of an ideal generated by n elements. Then the height of P is at most n. Conversely, if P has height n then it is a minimal prime of an ideal generated by n elements. That is, the height of a prime P is the same as the least number of generators of an ideal I ⊆ P of which P is a minimal prime. In particular, the height of every prime ideal P is at most the number of generators of P , and is therefore finite.
    [Show full text]
  • 23. Dimension Dimension Is Intuitively Obvious but Surprisingly Hard to Define Rigorously and to Work With
    58 RICHARD BORCHERDS 23. Dimension Dimension is intuitively obvious but surprisingly hard to define rigorously and to work with. There are several different concepts of dimension • It was at first assumed that the dimension was the number or parameters something depended on. This fell apart when Cantor showed that there is a bijective map from R ! R2. The Peano curve is a continuous surjective map from R ! R2. • The Lebesgue covering dimension: a space has Lebesgue covering dimension at most n if every open cover has a refinement such that each point is in at most n + 1 sets. This does not work well for the spectrums of rings. Example: dimension 2 (DIAGRAM) no point in more than 3 sets. Not trivial to prove that n-dim space has dimension n. No good for commutative algebra as A1 has infinite Lebesgue covering dimension, as any finite number of non-empty open sets intersect. • The "classical" definition. Definition 23.1. (Brouwer, Menger, Urysohn) A topological space has dimension ≤ n (n ≥ −1) if all points have arbitrarily small neighborhoods with boundary of dimension < n. The empty set is the only space of dimension −1. This definition is mostly used for separable metric spaces. Rather amazingly it also works for the spectra of Noetherian rings, which are about as far as one can get from separable metric spaces. • Definition 23.2. The Krull dimension of a topological space is the supre- mum of the numbers n for which there is a chain Z0 ⊂ Z1 ⊂ ::: ⊂ Zn of n + 1 irreducible subsets. DIAGRAM pt ⊂ curve ⊂ A2 For Noetherian topological spaces the Krull dimension is the same as the Menger definition, but for non-Noetherian spaces it behaves badly.
    [Show full text]
  • UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Previously Published Works
    UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Previously Published Works Title Operator bases, S-matrices, and their partition functions Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/31n0p4j4 Journal Journal of High Energy Physics, 2017(10) ISSN 1126-6708 Authors Henning, B Lu, X Melia, T et al. Publication Date 2017-10-01 DOI 10.1007/JHEP10(2017)199 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Published for SISSA by Springer Received: July 7, 2017 Accepted: October 6, 2017 Published: October 27, 2017 Operator bases, S-matrices, and their partition functions JHEP10(2017)199 Brian Henning,a Xiaochuan Lu,b Tom Meliac;d;e and Hitoshi Murayamac;d;e aDepartment of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06511, U.S.A. bDepartment of Physics, University of California, Davis, California 95616, U.S.A. cDepartment of Physics, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, U.S.A. dTheoretical Physics Group, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, U.S.A. eKavli Institute for the Physics and Mathematics of the Universe (WPI), Todai Institutes for Advanced Study, University of Tokyo, Kashiwa 277-8583, Japan E-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Abstract: Relativistic quantum systems that admit scattering experiments are quan- titatively described by effective field theories, where S-matrix kinematics and symmetry considerations are encoded in the operator spectrum of the EFT. In this paper we use the S-matrix to derive the structure of the EFT operator basis, providing complementary de- scriptions in (i) position space utilizing the conformal algebra and cohomology and (ii) mo- mentum space via an algebraic formulation in terms of a ring of momenta with kinematics implemented as an ideal.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1012.0864V3 [Math.AG] 14 Oct 2013 Nbt Emtyadpr Ler.Ltu Mhsz H Olwn Th Following the Emphasize Us H Let Results Cit.: His Algebra
    ORLOV SPECTRA: BOUNDS AND GAPS MATTHEW BALLARD, DAVID FAVERO, AND LUDMIL KATZARKOV Abstract. The Orlov spectrum is a new invariant of a triangulated category. It was intro- duced by D. Orlov building on work of A. Bondal-M. van den Bergh and R. Rouquier. The supremum of the Orlov spectrum of a triangulated category is called the ultimate dimension. In this work, we study Orlov spectra of triangulated categories arising in mirror symmetry. We introduce the notion of gaps and outline their geometric significance. We provide the first large class of examples where the ultimate dimension is finite: categories of singular- ities associated to isolated hypersurface singularities. Similarly, given any nonzero object in the bounded derived category of coherent sheaves on a smooth Calabi-Yau hypersurface, we produce a new generator by closing the object under a certain monodromy action and uniformly bound this new generator’s generation time. In addition, we provide new upper bounds on the generation times of exceptional collections and connect generation time to braid group actions to provide a lower bound on the ultimate dimension of the derived Fukaya category of a symplectic surface of genus greater than one. 1. Introduction The spectrum of a triangulated category was introduced by D. Orlov in [39], building on work of A. Bondal, R. Rouquier, and M. van den Bergh, [44] [11]. This categorical invariant, which we shall call the Orlov spectrum, is simply a list of non-negative numbers. Each number is the generation time of an object in the triangulated category. Roughly, the generation time of an object is the necessary number of exact triangles it takes to build the category using this object.
    [Show full text]
  • Commutative Algebra Ii, Spring 2019, A. Kustin, Class Notes
    COMMUTATIVE ALGEBRA II, SPRING 2019, A. KUSTIN, CLASS NOTES 1. REGULAR SEQUENCES This section loosely follows sections 16 and 17 of [6]. Definition 1.1. Let R be a ring and M be a non-zero R-module. (a) The element r of R is regular on M if rm = 0 =) m = 0, for m 2 M. (b) The elements r1; : : : ; rs (of R) form a regular sequence on M, if (i) (r1; : : : ; rs)M 6= M, (ii) r1 is regular on M, r2 is regular on M=(r1)M, ::: , and rs is regular on M=(r1; : : : ; rs−1)M. Example 1.2. The elements x1; : : : ; xn in the polynomial ring R = k[x1; : : : ; xn] form a regular sequence on R. Example 1.3. In general, order matters. Let R = k[x; y; z]. The elements x; y(1 − x); z(1 − x) of R form a regular sequence on R. But the elements y(1 − x); z(1 − x); x do not form a regular sequence on R. Lemma 1.4. If M is a finitely generated module over a Noetherian local ring R, then every regular sequence on M is a regular sequence in any order. Proof. It suffices to show that if x1; x2 is a regular sequence on M, then x2; x1 is a regular sequence on M. Assume x1; x2 is a regular sequence on M. We first show that x2 is regular on M. If x2m = 0, then the hypothesis that x1; x2 is a regular sequence on M guarantees that m 2 x1M; thus m = x1m1 for some m1.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Hilbert Function of a Graded Cohen-Macaulay Domain
    Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra 73 (lW1) 307-314 307 North-Holland Richard P. Stsnley” Department of Mathematics, Massachusetts Institute of Teclmology . Carnhridge. MA 02139. USA Communicated by A. Blass Received 7 May 1990 Revised 6 August 1990 Abstract Stanley, R.P., On the Hilbert function of a graded Cohen-Macaulay domain. Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra 73 (1991) 307-314. A condition is obtained on the Hilbert function of a graded Cohen-Macaulay domain R=R,$f?,G+. - over a field R, = K when R is integral over the subalgebra generated by R,. A result of Eisenbud and Harris leads to a stronger condition when char K = 0 and R is generated as a K-aigebra by R,. An application is given to the Ehrhart polynomial of an :,r____:-&W’ ^ ,,-l -u-i.-I\*..- _- c- --1..+,q,__~“t..‘. ... -_ _ _,_-_. 1. Introduction By a graded algebra over a field K, we mean here a commutative K-algebra R with identity, together with a vector space direct sum decompo&ion & = &_,l R;. such that: (a) RiRi c Ri+i, (b) R, = K (i.e., R is connected), and (c) R is finitely-generated as a K-algebra. R is standard if R is generated as a K-algebra by R,, and semistandard if R is integral over the subalgebra K[ R,] of R generated by R,. The Hilbert function H( R, -) of R is defined by H( R, i) = dim,R,, for i 2 0. while the Hilbert series is given by F(R, A) = 2 H(R, i)A’.
    [Show full text]
  • Commutative Algebra) Notes, 2Nd Half
    Math 221 (Commutative Algebra) Notes, 2nd Half Live [Locally] Free or Die. This is Math 221: Commutative Algebra as taught by Prof. Gaitsgory at Harvard during the Fall Term of 2008, and as understood by yours truly. There are probably typos and mistakes (which are all mine); use at your own risk. If you find the aforementioned mistakes or typos, and are feeling in a generous mood, then you may consider sharing this information with me.1 -S. Gong [email protected] 1 CONTENTS Contents 1 Divisors 2 1.1 Discrete Valuation Rings (DVRs), Krull Dimension 1 . .2 1.2 Dedekind Domains . .6 1.3 Divisors and Fractional Ideals . .8 1.4 Dedekind Domains and Integral Closedness . 11 1.5 The Picard Group . 16 2 Dimension via Hilbert Functions 21 2.1 Filtrations and Gradations . 21 2.2 Dimension of Modules over a Polynomial Algebra . 24 2.3 For an arbitrary finitely generated algebra . 27 3 Dimension via Transcendency Degree 31 3.1 Definitions . 31 3.2 Agreement with Hilbert dimension . 32 4 Dimension via Chains of Primes 34 4.1 Definition via chains of primes and Noether Normalization . 34 4.2 Agreement with Hilbert dimension . 35 5 Kahler Differentials 37 6 Completions 42 6.1 Introduction to inverse limits and completions . 42 6.2 Artin Rees Pattern . 46 7 Local Rings and Other Notions of Dimension 50 7.1 Dimension theory for Local Noetherian Rings . 50 8 Smoothness and Regularity 53 8.1 Regular Local Rings . 53 8.2 Smoothness/Regularity for algebraically closed fields . 55 8.3 A taste of smoothness and regularity for non-algebraically closed fields .
    [Show full text]
  • Expansive Subdynamics
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 349, Number 1, January 1997, Pages 55–102 S 0002-9947(97)01634-6 EXPANSIVE SUBDYNAMICS MIKE BOYLE AND DOUGLAS LIND Abstract. This paper provides a framework for studying the dynamics of d commuting homeomorphisms. Let α be a continuous action of Z on an infi- d nite compact metric space. For each subspace V of R we introduce a notion of expansiveness for α along V , and show that there are nonexpansive subspaces in every dimension d 1. For each k d the set Ek(α) of expansive k- dimensional subspaces≤ is− open in the Grassmann≤ manifold of all k-dimensional d subspaces of R . Various dynamical properties of α are constant, or vary nicely, within a connected component of Ek(α), but change abruptly when passing from one expansive component to another. We give several examples of this sort of “phase transition,” including the topological and measure-theoretic di- rectional entropies studied by Milnor, zeta functions, and dimension groups. For d = 2 we show that, except for one unresolved case, every open set of directions whose complement is nonempty can arise as an E1(α). The unre- solved case is that of the complement of a single irrational direction. Algebraic examples using commuting automorphisms of compact abelian groups are an important source of phenomena, and we study several instances in detail. We conclude with a set of problems and research directions suggested by our anal- ysis. Contents 1. Introduction 56 2. Definitions and examples 57 3. Nonexpansive subspaces 63 4. Realization 67 5.
    [Show full text]
  • 2-Dimensional Vertex Decomposable Circulant Graphs
    2-DIMENSIONAL VERTEX DECOMPOSABLE CIRCULANT GRAPHS GIANCARLO RINALDO AND FRANCESCO ROMEO n Abstract. Let G be the circulant graph Cn(S) with S ⊆ {1,..., 2 } and let ∆ be its independence complex. We describe the well-covered circulant graphs with 2-dimensional ∆ and construct an infinite family of vertex-decomposable circulant graphs within this family. Key Words: Circulant graphs, Cohen-Macaulay, Vertex decomposability. 2010 Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary 13F55. Secondary 13H10 Introduction N n Let n ∈ and S ⊆ {1, 2,..., 2 }. The circulant graph G := Cn(S) is a graph with vertex set Z = {0,...,n − 1} and edge set E(G) := {{i, j} | n |j − i|n ∈ S} where |k|n = min{|k|,n − |k|}. Let R = K[x0,...,xn−1] be the polynomial ring on n variables over a field K. The edge ideal of G, denoted by I(G), is the ideal of R generated by all square-free monomials xixj such that {i, j} ∈ E(G). Edge ideals of graphs have been introduced by Villarreal [20] in 1990, where he studied the Cohen–Macaulay property of such ideals. Many authors have focused their attention on such ideals (e.g.[10], [12]). A known fact about Cohen- Macaulay edge ideals is that they are well-covered, that is all the maximal independent sets of G have the same cardinality. Despite the nice structure the circulant graphs have, it has been proved that is hard to compute their clique number (see [5]), and hence the Krull dimension of R/I(G). arXiv:1807.05755v1 [math.AC] 16 Jul 2018 In particular, some well-covered circulant graphs have been studied (see [2], [3],[19], [8] and [15]).
    [Show full text]
  • MAT4210—Algebraic Geometry I: Notes 5 the Dimension of Varieties 16Th March 2018
    MAT4210—Algebraic geometry I: Notes 5 The dimension of varieties 16th March 2018 Hot themes in notes 5: Krull dimension of spaces—finite maps and Going Up—Noethers Normalization Lemma—transcendence degree and dimension—the dimension of An—the dimenion of a product— Krull’s Principal Ideal Theorem—Intersections in projective space. Very preliminary version 0.2 as of 16th March 2018 at 9:46am—Prone to mis- prints and errors. Changes 2018-02-26 10:08:34: Rewritten section about Krull’s Principal Ideal Theorem. Added a section about the dimension of a product. Proposition 5.2was wrong as stated; has bee corrected. Geir Ellingsrud — [email protected] Introduction Dimension For general topological spaces there is no good notion of dimension. Manifolds of course, have a dimension (or at least each connected component has). They are locally isomorphic to open sets in some euclidean space, and the dimension of that space is constant along connected components, and is the dimension of the component. Noetherian topological spaces as well, have a dimension, and in many instances it is very useful, although it can be infinite. The def- inition is inspired by the concept of the Krull dimension of a Noethe- rian ring; and resembles vaguely one of our naive conception of dimension. For example, in three dimensional geometric gadgets, called threefolds, we may imagine increasing chains of subgadgets of length three; points in curves, curves in surfaces and surfaces in the threefold. The definition below works for any topological space, but the ensuing dimension carries not much information unless the topology is “Zariski-like”.
    [Show full text]
  • Commutative Algebra Dimension Theory of Noetherian Rings June 18, 2020
    Commutative Algebra Dimension theory of Noetherian Rings June 18, 2020 1. Krull Dimension Recall the definition of dimension of a ring. In this lecture we shall call it the Krull dimension and denote it by dim. Definition 1: Let A be a ring and p a prime ideal of A. We define the height of p, denoted by ht p, to be the supremum of lengths n of all chains p0 ⊂ p1 ⊂ ::: ⊂ pn = p of prime ideals pi 2 A such that pi 6= pi+1. The Krull dimension of A is dim A = supfht p j p ⊂ A prime idealg. Clearly, ht p = 0 () p is a minimal prime ideal. Moreover, the Krull dimension is in fact the supremum over the heights of all maximal ideals of a ring. Example 1. We have already seen that artinian rings and fields have Krull dimension 0. More- over, Dedekind domains by definition have Krull dimension 1. Exercise (i). Let A be a ring, p ⊂ A a prime ideal and Ap the localisation of A at p, then show that ht p = dim Ap. Infer that dim A = supfdim Am j m ⊂ A; maximal idealg. Example 2 (Integral extension has same Krull dimension). If A ⊂ B are rings and B is integral over A then dim A = dim B. Recall that if q ⊂ q0 are prime ideals of B such that q \ A = q0 \ A, 0 then q = q . Hence if q0 ⊂ ::: ⊂ qn is a chain of prime ideals in B, and pi = qi \ A, then p0 ⊂ ::: ⊂ pn is a chain in A, thus dim A ≥ dim B.
    [Show full text]
  • The Concept of Dimension: a Theoretical and an Informal Approach
    Tesi di Laurea — Diplomarbeit The concept of dimension: a theoretical and an informal approach Ester Dalvit Relatore Betreuer Prof. Dr. Domenico Luminati Prof. Dr. J¨urgen Hausen Anno Accademico 2006–2007 Contents Introduction vii Introduzione xi Einleitung xv I A survey on dimension 1 1 Dimension of manifolds 3 1.1 Basicconcepts........................... 3 1.2 Tangentspace........................... 5 1.3 Sard’sTheorem .......................... 8 1.4 SomeresultsinAlgebraicTopology . 15 1.5 Invarianceofdomain . 16 2 Dimension of affine varieties 21 2.1 Basicconcepts........................... 22 2.2 Affinetangentspaces . 27 2.3 Derivations ............................ 29 2.4 Regularandsingularpoints . 36 2.5 Transcendencedegree. 38 2.6 Morphisms............................. 42 2.7 Krulldimension.......................... 45 2.8 Zariskidimension . .. .. .. 47 2.9 Krulldimensionforrings. 49 3 Dimension of metric spaces 53 3.1 Three concepts of dimension . 53 3.2 Somebasictheory......................... 57 3.3 The large inductive dimension . 60 3.4 SumtheoremforInd ....................... 66 3.5 Subspace and decomposition theorems for Ind . 69 3.6 ProducttheoremforInd . 70 3.7 Coveringdimension. 71 3.8 Coincidencetheorems. 80 3.9 The dimension of the Euclidean space . 85 II Informal learning of mathematics 89 4 An exhibition about the 4D space 91 4.1 Somebasicdefinitions . 92 4.2 Contentsoftheexhibition . 94 4.2.1 Introduction........................ 94 4.2.2 Models........................... 94 4.2.3 Symmetry ......................... 97 4.2.4 Slices............................ 97 4.2.5 Dice ............................ 98 4.2.6 Flipacube ........................ 98 4.2.7 Polytopes ......................... 98 4.3 Flipacube ............................ 99 4.3.1 Animationsandimages. .101 4.3.2 Flipasquare .......................103 4.3.3 Flipacube ........................106 4.4 Otheranimations . .110 4.4.1 Foldingupa(hyper)cube. 110 4.4.2 Projections ........................112 4.4.3 Hypersphere.
    [Show full text]