<<

Turkish Journal of Zoology Turk J Zool (2017) 41: 599-614 http://journals.tubitak.gov.tr/zoology/ © TÜBİTAK Research Article doi:10.3906/zoo-1604-74

A catalogue of the and (: Lumbricina) from South America, with two new records of exotic from Brazil

1, 2 2 José Eriberto DE ASSIS *, José Roberto Botelho SOUZA , Maria Laís Martins VIEIRA , 2 2 1 João Vitor NUNES DE SOUZA , Gilberto Gonçalves RODRIGUES , Martin Lindsey CHRISTOFFERSEN 1 Department of Systematics and Ecology, Exact and Natural Science Center, Federal University of Paraíba, João Pessoa, Paraíba, Brazil 2 Department of Zoology, Biosciences Center, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil

Received: 30.04.2016 Accepted/Published Online: 14.01.2017 Final Version: 17.07.2017

Abstract: A catalogue of the terrestrial Eudrilidae and Megascolecidae is provided, with 10 genera and 18 species reported to date from South America. In addition, we provide the valid names, their synonyms, and the original citation. Eudrilidae and Megascolecidae contain members that have a global distribution, probably as a result of human dispersion. The species of eudrilidEudrilus eugeniae is very common in other regions with a tropical climate, while the megascolecid species gracilis is by far the most common in large cities such as São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro in Brazil. Two samples taken in Brazil revealed two new exotic species from this country: Amynthas robustus (Perrier, 1872) and bicincta (Perrier, 1875), which are described and illustrated. Finally, we provide a taxonomic key to the genera of both families.

Key words: , exotic species, Eudrilidae, Megascolecidae, South America

1. Introduction some islands of the western Pacific Ocean) (Easton, 1982). The Eudrilidae are endemic to the Ethiopian About 40 species are found outside this area (Easton, 1982; region (Reynolds, 1994). They present extreme variations Blakemore, 2002, 2010). Many pheretimoids can jump by in the sexual apparatus, particularly of the female organs means of powerful contractions of the body (Omodeo, (Omodeo, 2000; Blakemore, 2002, 2010). Eudriline 2000). All megascolecids dealt with herein are members of evolution has resulted in economy of sperm production. this group. Modifications in the male apparatus appear to reduce, or Eisen (1900) and Michaelsen (1903, 1935) noticed prevent, gregarine ravages (Sims, 1987). eugeniae that, in the Caribbean, native earthworms were vanishing has achieved a pantropical distribution (Omodeo, 2000). from regions influenced by human activity and were being Megascolecidae is the most diverse family of earthworms replaced by exotic species. By now, it is well known that (Blakemore, 2002); it has over 1000 species (Sims and exotic species dominate in disturbed ecosystems, with Gerard, 1985; Blakemore, 2002). Most of them are native native species predominating in natural, undisturbed to (Blakemore, 2002) and (Sims and environments (Fragoso et al., 1995). Gerard, 1985). One of the family , The rapid pace of destruction in the tropical Diplocardia, is native to North America. Several genera of regions is widely recognized as a threat to biotic diversity. Megascolecidae sensu stricto [i.e. Arctiostrotus, , Peregrine species may eventually cover the tropical Chetcodrilus, Drilochaera, (the only meroic regions. Only a few native species are capable of surviving genus), Kincaidodrilus, Macnabodrilus, Nephrallaxis, and and coexisting with exotic worms in disturbed ecosystems Toutellus], placed under the as of yet poorly defined tribe (Fragoso et al., 1995). Argilophilini Fender & McKey-Fender, 1990 (Gates, 1942; Our aim is to provide a catalogue of the Eudrilidae and James, 1995; Blakemore, 2000, 2010), are native to North Megascolecidae reported to date from the South American America. auct. (= the pheretimoids) is a group continent and describe and report two new exotic species of genera within Megascolecidae that are indigenous to the of pheretimoids for northeastern Brazil. We also provide a so-called Pheretima domain (all of southern Asia, Japan, the taxonomic key to the genera of the two families reported Indo-Australasian archipelago, the Solomon Islands, and herein. * Correspondence: [email protected] 599 DE ASSIS et al. / Turk J Zool

2. Materials and methods James and Brown, 2006): Vinhedo (Righi, 1968); São Data for geographical distribution were collected from Sebastião; Boituva; Campinas; São Paulo (Brown et al., earthworm bibliographies. We provide the following 2006); RJ: Petrópolis (Michaelsen, 1927); Nova Friburgo information: families, genera, species, and other groups, (Brown et al., 2006); MG: Juiz de Fora (Brown et al., 2006); organized alphabetically, with original citation, year of BA: Itajubá and Jequié; SE: Aracajú (Brown et al., 2006); publication, and all related citations from South America. PB: Areia (Guerra and Silva, 1994); PE: Recife (Righi, The synonyms are provided according to Blakemore (2010, 1967a, 1971); Ponta de Pedras; MA: São Luís (Brown et 2014). In the case of Amynthas corticis, those references al., 2006); PA: Vila de Maiauatá, margins of Pará River, pertaining to A. diffringens (Baird, 1869) and its synonyms 20 km southwest of Abaetetuba (Righi, 1972); COL: Valle have been removed from the synonymy of A. corticis, Dep.: Palmira (Feijoo, 2007); San Andrés Island (Reynolds as A. diffringens has been deemed valid by Blakemore and Reynolds, 2001). VEN: Caracas (Michaelsen, 1900a); (2013). We used 3-letter abbreviations for South American Portamer; Isla Margarita (Michaelsen, 1892; Zicsi, 1995a). countries (ARG, Argentina; BOL, Bolivia; BRA, Brazil; GUY and SUR (Beddard, 1887; Michaelsen, 1900a). FRG: CHI, Chile; COL, Colombia; ECU, Ecuador; FRG, French Saint Georges Oyapock (Michaelsen, 1900a; Cernosvitov, Guyana; GUY, Guyana; PER, Peru; SUR, Surinam; URU, 1934, 1935) (Figure 1A). Uruguay; VEN, Venezuela), and 2-letter abbreviations Further distribution: Caribbean region (Zicsi, 1995a). for sampled states in Brazil (AM, Amazonas; BA, Bahia; North America, Africa, Asia, New Caledonia (Gates, DF, Distrito Federal; MG, Minas Gerais; PA, Pará; PB, 1972), and Australia (Blakemore, 2002, 2010, 2014). Paraíba; PE, Pernambuco; PR, Paraná; RJ, Rio de Janeiro; Genus Hyperiodrilus Beddard, 1890 RR, Roraima; RS, Rio Grande do Sul; SC, Santa Catarina; Type: Hyperiodrilus africanus Beddard, 1891 SP, São Paulo); “?” indicates taxonomic uncertainty. New 2. Hyperiodrilus africanus (Beddard, 1891) records herein are based on two samples taken on 28 Distribution: West and Central Africa: from Nigeria, April 2009 and 8 May 2010 in an urban area located in Ghana, and Ivory Coast to Chiloango River in “Portuguese Campina Grande, State of Paraíba, in northeastern Brazil Congo” (Blakemore, 2010); Pontas de Pedras, PE, Brazil (7°13′28″S, 35°52′2″W and 7°12′56″S, 35°53′50″W). They (Righi, 1972; Brown et al., 2006) (Figure 1A). were collected by hand-sorting, fixed in 10% formalin Family MEGASCOLECIDAE Rosa, 1891 solution, and preserved in 70% alcohol. The specimens are Genus Amynthas Kinberg, 1867 deposited in Invertebrate Collection Paulo Young of the Type: Amynthas aeruginosus Kinberg, 1867 Universidade Federal da Paraíba (LIPY). 3. Amynthas aeruginosus (Kinberg, 1867) Amyntas aeruginosus Kinberg, 1867: 101. [Type 3. Results locality: Guam, Marianas Islands. Types in Stockholm Museum: 154]. ?Perichaeta upoluensis Beddard, 1887: Suborder LUMBRICINA (part.) De Blainville, 1828 174, Pl V, figs. 11–12;Perichaeta oeriginosa (?lapsus pro Terricolae (part.) Örsted, 1843; Megadrili Benham, 1890 aeruginosa) Beddard, 1891: 278. Pheretima aeruginosus: Superfamily MEGASCOLECOIDEA Rosa, 1891 Michaelsen, 1900: 253 (syn. oeriginosa [sic]); Cognetti, Family EUDRILIDAE Claus, 1880 1913b: 37. ?Pheretima rennellana Gates, 1959: 11. [Type Genus Eudrilus Perrier, 1871 locality, Hutuna, Lake Te-Nggano, Rennell. Types in British Type: Eudrilus decipiens Perrier, 1871 (= E. eugeniae) Museum, 1957: 11: 5: 25–26]. Amynthas aeruginosus 9829 1031 (part): Sims and Easton, 1972: 211 (?syn. A. upoluensis, A. 1. (Kinberg, 1867) rennellanus); Lee, 1981: 542, figs. 2–6 (?syn. A. upoluensis); Lumbricus eugeniae Kinberg, 1967: 98. [Type locality: Blakemore, 1997: 22, fig. 2 (part = A rennellanus). humid mountains and Valley of St Helena Island (British Distribution: PR (Sautter et al., 2006): Prudentópolis protectorate) in South Atlantic. Types are in Stockholm (Brown et al., 2006; Brawn and James, 2006) (Figure 1B). Museum and/or in British Museum BMNH 1904.10.5.549 Further distribution: Pacific Ocean (Michaelsen, or 550]. 1900a; Blakemore, 2010). Eudrilus decipiens Perrier, 1871: 1176; Eudrilus lacazii + 4. Amynthas corticis (Kinberg, 1867) peregrinus Perrier, 1872: 75, 77/78; Eudrilus boyeri Beddard, Perichaeta corticis Kinberg, 1867; Megascolex (Perichaeta) 1886: 302; Eudrilus sylvicola Beddard, 1887: 372. Eudrilus diffringens Baird, 1869; Perichaeta subquadrangula Grube, jullieni Horst, 1890: 225; Eudrilus roseus Michaelsen, 1892: 1877; Perichaeta sp. Horst, 1878; Megascolex indicus Horst, 224; Eudrilus erudiens Ude, 1893: 71. 1883; Perichaeta peregrina Fletcher, 1886; ?Perichaeta Distribution: BRA (Righi, 1967a): PR (Nunes et al., mirabilis Bourne, 1887; ?Perichaeta sp. Garmann, 1888; 2006; Sautter et al., 2006); Londrina; Ibiaci (Brown et al., Perichaeta heterochaeta Michaelsen, 1891; ?Perichaeta ijimae 2006); SP (Lüderwaldt, 1927; Brown and James, 2006; Rosa, 1891; Perichaeta nipponica Beddard, 1892; ?Perichaeta

600 DE ASSIS et al. / Turk J Zool

Figure 1. Geographical distribution in South America of exotic Eudrilidae (A) and Megascolecidae (B–D) species: A) Eudrilus euganiae (circle), and Hyperiodrilus africanus (star); B) Amynthas aeruginosus (circle), and Amynthas corticis (square); C) Amynthas gracilis (triangle); D) Amynthas morrisi (star) and Amynthas robustus (circle) (new record from Brazil).

601 DE ASSIS et al. / Turk J Zool perkinsi Beddard, 1896; ?Perichaeta molokaiensis Beddard, Perichaeta hawayana Rosa, 1891: 396; ?Perichaeta ijimae 1896; Perichaeta heteropoda Goto & Hatai, 1898; Pheretima Rosa, 1891: 402; Perichaeta bermudensis Beddard, marenzelleri Cognetti, 1906; ?Pheretima silvestrii Cognetti, 1892a: 160; ?Perichaeta pallida Michaelsen, 1892: 227; 1909; Pheretima divergens yunnanensis Stephenson, Perichaeta mandhorensis Michaelsen, 1892: 241, figs. 18-19; 1912; ?Pheretima indica var. cameroni Stephenson, 1932; ?Perichaeta barbadensis (part., spec “b”?) Beddard, 1892a: ?Pheretima sheni Chen, 1935; ?Pheretima directa Chen, 167; ?Perichaeta mauritiana Beddard, 1892a: 170, Pl. X, 1935; Pheretima oyamai Ohfuchi, 1937; Pheretima tajiroensis figs. 5–6; ?Perichaeta kamakurensis Goto & Hatai, 1898: Ohfuchi, 1938; ?Pheretima morii Kobayashi, 1938; Pheretima 68; ?Perichaeta parvula Goto & Hatai, 1898: 68. [Types?]. toriii Ohfuchi, 1941; ?Pheretima clerica Benham 1947; [Non Ohfuchi, 1956 (= parvula)]; ?Perichaeta Pheretima campestris Lee, 1952; ?Pheretima hatomajimensis decimpapillata Goto & Hatai, 1898: 71; Amyntas ijimae: Ohfuchi, 1957; Amynthas nanrenensis James et al., 2005. Beddard (1900: 635); Pheretima hawayana: Michaelsen, Distribution: ARG: Buenos Aires Prov.; Catamarca 1900: 271, 316; Amyntas hawayanus: Beddard, 1900: 420; Prov.; Misiones Prov.; Santa Fé Prov. (Mischis, 2004; ?Pheretima kagoshimensis Takahashi, 1932: 343; ?Pheretima Mischis and Herrera, 2006; Mischis, 2007); Tucumán kamitai Kobayashi, 1934: 5, figs. 4–6; ?Pheretima hawayana Prov.: Potrerillo (Gates, 1972) and Villa Nougues var. barbadensis: Cernosvitov, 1934: 49. (Teisaire, 1991); Córdoba Prov. (Mischis, 1992): Capital, Amynthas gracilis: Sims and Easton, 1972: 235 (in an Calamuchita, Colón, and Santa Maria Deps. (Mischis, A. hawayanus group containing nearly 50 nominal taxa); 1993); San Luis Prov. (Mischis and Brigada, 1985); Salta Easton, 1981: 50 (syn. hawayana, ?kamakurensis, ?parvula, (Teisaire et al., 2003). BOL: Murillo Prov: La Paz Dep.: decimpapillata, ?carnosa, ?kagoshimensis); Easton, 1982: Vale del Rio Zongo, near Cambaya (Righi and Römbke, 728 (syn. hawayana); Sims and Gerard, 1985: 130 (syn. 1987): Cahura St. (Zicsi, 1995b). PER (Michaelsen, 1892). hawayana); Blakemore, 2002, 2008. ECU: Pichincha Prov.: Quito (Zicsi and Csuzdi, 1988). Distribution: CHI: Santiago: Quinta Normal (Zicsi, COL: Palmira, El Cerrito, Caldono, Silva Santander 2004). ARG (Dulout et al., 1969a; Lauría De Cidre, 1972): Rosa, Mocoa Putumayo (Feijoo et al., 2004); Cabuyal Chubut Prov.: Piedra del Aguila; Puerto Madryn (Mischis River (Feijoo et al., 1999); Andean hillside (Feijoo et al., et al., 2006); Neuquén Prov.; San Luís Prov. (Mischis, 2006); Bogotá (Michaelsen, 1900a). VEN: In earth with 2004, 2007; Mischis and Herrera, 2006); Santa Fé Prov. plant arriving by plane in San Juan, Puerto Rico. BRA: (Ljungström et al., 1973); Córdoba Prov.: Sierras Chicas From earth for nematode analysis arriving by plane in (Mischis, 1999); Dep. Capital, Dep. Calamuchita (Mischis, New York (Gates, 1982): RS (Righi, 1965; Knäpper, 1977; 1993); Tucumán Prov.: Tucumán (Teisaire and Roldán, Knäpper and Porto, 1979; Krabbe et al., 1993): Nova 1995; Alderete-De-Majo, 2002a, 2002b, 2002c, 2003a, Petrópolis (Knäpper, 1967); Santo Ângelo; Santa Cruz 2003b); Catamarca Prov.: Las Pirquitas Ville (Mischis and do Sul; Santana do Livramento; Gramado; Caxias do Sul; Righi, 1999); Buenos Aires Prov.: Buenos Aires (Mercadal Estância Velha; Lajeado; Tramandaí (Knäpper, 1972a); Del Barrio and Barrio, 1988; Burela and Cazzaniga, 2001). São Leopoldo (Righi and Knäpper, 1965); Camaquã Mun. URU: Montevideo (Cordero, 1931). ECU (Fragoso and (Lima and Rodriguez, 2007); PR (Voss, 1986; Dionísio et Brown, 2007; Zicsi, 2007). COL: Buenaventura; Palmira; al., 1995; Sautter et al., 1995; Chang, 1997; Tanck et al., Caldono Santander Cauca; Cali; Mocoa Putumayo (Feijoo, 2000; Brown et al., 2004; Sautter et al., 2006): Londrina 2007); Andean hillside (Feijoo et al., 2006); Cabuyal River (Brown et al., 2003); Arapoti (Peixoto and Marochi, 1996); (Feijoo et al., 1999). VEN (Drachenberg, 1992): From SP (Righi, 1965; Brown and James, 2006): northwest of earth with plants arriving by plane at San Juan, Puerto São Paulo State (Caballero, 1976); Campos do Jordão and Rico (Gates, 1982). FRG (Cernosvitov, 1934). BRA São Sebastião (Righi, 1967b); RJ (Zicsi and Csuzdi, 1999): (Moreira, 1903; Righi, 1967b): RS (Michaelsen, 1892; Seropédica (Brown et al., 2006); Nova Friburgo (Gates, 1927; Knäpper, 1972b; Knäpper and Porto, 1979; Krabbe 1954); Parque Nacional do Itatiaia, near Abrigo Rebouças; et al., 1993); Guaíba estuary (Knäpper, 1976); Estrêla MG: Jaboticatuba: Serra do Cipó: Estrada Vespaziano- (Righi and Knäpper, 1965); Santo Ângelo; Santa Cruz do Conceição do Matodentro, km 120 (Righi, 1980); Juiz de Sul; Santana do Livramento; Gramado; Nova Petrópolis; Fora (Brown et al., 2006); AM (James and Brown, 2006) Ivoti; Sapucaio; Canoas; Lajeado; Estrêla; Tramandaí (Figure 1B). (Knäpper, 1972a); Camaquã Mun. (Lima and Rodriguez, Further distribution: Panama to Mexico (Righi, 2007); SC: Blumenau; Schroeder (Brown et al., 2006); PR 1967b), (Beddard, 1893), Asia (Brown et al., 2003), (Voss, 1986; Dionísio et al., 1995; Kobiyama et al., 1995; and Australia (Easton, 1982). Sautter et al., 1995; Peixoto and Marochi, 1996; Chang, 5. Amynthas gracilis (Kinberg, 1867) 1997; Tanck et al., 2000; Brown et al., 2004): Londrina Nitocris gracilis Kinberg, 1867: 102. [Type locality (Brown et al., 2003); Curitiba (Zicsi and Csuzdi, 1999); SP Rio de Janeiro; ?[Perichaeta bournei Rosa, 1890: 110; (Lüderwaldt, 1927; Gates, 1972; Lenko, 1972; Caballero,

602 DE ASSIS et al. / Turk J Zool

1976); Piracicaba; Itatiaia; Paranapiacaba (Alto da Serra); 1997; Sautter et al., 2006); Curitiba (Brown et al., 2006); São Paulo: Ipiranga; Belém (Lüderwaldt, 1927); São Paulo SP (Brown and James, 2006; James and Brown, 2006); BA: University campus (Jorge and Sawaya, 1967); Barueri, in Salvador (Righi, 1971); AM: Manaus (Michaelsen, 1927) ant colonies (Lenko, 1972); São Roque; Rio Preto; Salto (Figure 1D). de Itú (Vannucci, 1953); RJ (Kinberg, 1867; Vannucci, Further distribution: Barbados to North America, 1953); MG: Paraopeba, Fazenda do Rasgão, Cachoeira Europe, South Atlantic Oceanic islands, Africa, Asia, dos Macacos, and Fazenda Pedra Branca (Righi, 1980); Hawaii (Righi, 1979), and Australia (Easton, 1982). DF: Brasília (Brown et al., 2006); BA: Ituberá (Brown et 7. Amynthas robustus (Perrier, 1872) al., 2006); PB: Areia (Guerra and Silva, 1994); PA: Belém Perichaeta cingulata (part cf. P. darnleiensis): Vaillant, (Brown et al., 2006); AM (James and Brown, 2006): 1867: 234; Perichaeta robusta Perrier, 1872: 112, figs. 67– Manaus (Michaelsen, 1927) (Figure 1C). 68; Perichaeta masatakae Beddard, 1892: 761; ?Pheretima Further distribution: Barbados to Mexico, North campestris Goto & Hatai, 1898: 67 [non campestris Lee, 1952 America, Europe, Africa, Asia (Righi, 1979), Australia (= A. corticis)]; ?Perichaeta parvicystis Goto & Hatai, 1899: (Easton, 1982), Hawaii (Rosa, 1891; Nakamura, 1992), and 18, figs. 8, 8a, 8b; Megascolex robustus: Vaillant, 1889: 76; South Atlantic Ocean (Cernosvitov, 1942). Pheretima lauta Ude, 1905: 405 (429?, 464?; Pheretima lauta 6. Amynthas morrisi (Beddard, 1892) Chen, 1933: 282, fig. 26; ?Pheretima zavattarii Cognetti, Perichaeta morrisi Beddard, 1892a (July): 166, Pl. IX, 1909: 1; Cognetti, 1909: 310; Pheretima ornata Gates, 1927: fig. 1; Perichaeta? barbadensis (?part “a” and/or “c”) Beddard, 20; Pheretima corrugata Chen, 1931: 131; 1933: 278 (non 1892a (July): 167, Pl. IX, fig. 7; Perichaeta? mauritiana P. corrugata kulingiana); ?Pheretima sheni Chen, 1935: 38; Beddard, 1892a: 170; ?Perichaeta pallida Michaelsen, Pheretima robusta: Michaelsen, 1900: 299. 1892 (Sept.): 227; ?Perichaeta amazonica Rosa, 1894: 14; Amynthas robustus: Sims and Easton, 1972: 234; ?Perichaeta sanctijacobi Beddard, 1895: 239; ?Perichaeta Easton, 1981: 56 (syn. mastakae [sic lapsus pro masatakae], insulae Beddard, 1896: 516; ?Perichaeta cupulifera Fedarb, campestris Goto & Hatai, 1898 [non Lee, 1952], lauta, 1898: 445, fig. 1; Amynthas barbadensis: Michaelsen, 1900: corrugata); Blakemore, 2002, 2008. 254 (syn. pallida Michaelsen, 1892: 227, amazonica Rosa, New record: Campina Grande, Paraíba, Brazil: (BRA: 1894:14, sanctijacobi Beddard, 1895: 61, cupulifera Fedarb, PB). 1898: 445); Pheretima hawayana lineata Gates, 1926: 154; Further distribution: Mauritius, Philippines, Myanmar, 1931: 384–386, fig. 24; Pheretima elongata : Ohfuchi, 1956: India, China, Taiwan, Korea, Japan, Okinawa?, Madagascar 148; Pheretima exiloides: Ohfuchi, 1956: 142; Pheretima (Gates, 1972; Blakemore, 2002, 2010); São Paulo, Brazil morrisi: Michaelsen, 1900: 287. (Righi, 1967), cited as P. aspergillum. Amynthas morrisi: Sims and Easton, 1972: 236, figs. Examined material: Specimen: One adult specimen 1A, 1H; Easton, 1981: 55 (syn. exiloides: Ohfuchi, elongata: collected on 8 May 2010 in an urban area located in Ohfuchi); Easton, 1982: 729, fig. 4c; Sims and Gerard, 1985: Campina Grande (7°12′56.60″S, 35°53′50.34″W), State of 132, fig. 47a (syn. barbadensis, mauritiana); Blakemore, Paraíba, Northeast Brazil (UFPB 1460) (Figure 1D). 2002, 2008; Chang et al., 2009: 60, fig. 26. Description: Length: 105 mm. Diameter: 4–5 mm. Distribution: CHI (Zicsi, 1993): Santiago: Quinta Segments: 96. Prostomium: open epilobous. First dorsal Normal (Beddard, 1895). ARG (Mischis, 2004; Mischis pore: 11/12. Setae: perichaetine. Nephropores: absent. and Herrera, 2006): Tucumán Prov. (Teisaire and Roldán, Clitellum: 14–16, annular, darker than the rest of the 1995; Alderete-De-Majo, 2002a, 2002b, 2002c, 2003a, earthworm. Spermathecal pores: 2 pairs in 7/8/9. Female 2003b); Santa Fé Prov. (Ljungström et al., 1973): La pores: single on 14. Male pores: a pair on conical porophores Capital (Righi, 1978); Buenos Aires Prov. (Righi, 1979); in 18. Genital markings: one pair anterior-median to the Córdoba (Mischis, 1993): Sierra Chicas (Mischis, 1999); male pores (Figure 2A). Septa: 5/6–7/8 thickened and Catamarca Prov.: Las Pirquitas Ville (Mischis and Righi, 8/9/10 absent. Spermathecae: 2 pairs in 8 and 9 (Figure 1999). PER (Righi, 1979). PER: Tumbes Prov.: Negritos 2B). Nephridia: meroic. Gizzard: 8–9. Hearts: 10–13. (Gates, 1954, 1972; Fragoso and Brown, 2007; Römbke, Calciferous glands: absent. Ovaries: a pair in 13. Testes: 10 2007); Pichincha Prov.: Cunuyacu (Zicsi and Csuzdi, and 11, seminal vesicles large in 11 and 12, pseudovesicles 1988). BRA (Cernosvitov, 1934): RS (Michaelsen, 1927; in 13–14. Prostate glands: racemose, opening in 18 and Knäpper, 1972b; Knäpper and Porto, 1979; Krabbe et extending into 16–19 (Figure 2C). Intestinal origin: 15, al., 1993); Lageado (Righi and Knäpper, 1965); Novo with a pair of ceca extending into 26–20 (Figure 2D). Hamburgo (Knäpper, 1967); Santo Ângelo; Santa Cruz do Remarks: A. robustus was found in association Sul; Nova Petrópolis; Ivoti; Caxias do Sul; Estância Velha; with E. eugeniae in the first 10-cm layer of with a São Leopoldo. Sapucaio; Tramandaí (Knäpper, 1972a); high concentration of organic matter. A. robustus often Camaquã Mun. (Lima and Rodriguez, 2007); PR (Chang, reproduces by parthenogenesis because of male sterility.

603 DE ASSIS et al. / Turk J Zool

Figure 2. A) Amynthas robustus, anterior body part in ventral view, genital markings on 18; B) spermatheca with a single diverticulum; C) prostatic gland; D) intestinal caecum.

604 DE ASSIS et al. / Turk J Zool

A record from America based on a British Museum Chicas (Mischis, 1999); Tucumán Prov. (Teisaire and specimen was erroneously labeled A. gracilis according to Roldán, 1995; Alderete-De-Majo, 2002a, 2002b, 2002c, Gates (1972). Fragoso and Brown (2007) considered this 2003a, 2003b): San Miguel de Tucumán (Dulout et al., species as exotic for Brazil. 1969c; Levin et al., 1969); Santa Fé Prov. (Ljungström et 8. Amynthas rodericensis (Grube, 1879) al., 1973): San Tomé (Righi, 1978); Salta (Teisaire et al., Perichaeta rodericensis Grube, 1879: 554; Perichaeta dyeri 2003). PER (Righi, 1979): From earth around plant in Beddard, 1892: 57, Pl. IX, figs. 2, ,8 Pl. X, fig. 1; Perichaeta baggage by plane arriving in New Orleans (Gates, 1982); sinensis Beddard, 1892a: 158, Pl. IX, figs. 3, 5, Pl. X, figs. 2–4, Huanco Prov: Chogosh (Michaelsen, 1935; Fragoso and 7, 8; ?Perichaeta trinitatis Beddard, 1896: 206; Perichaeta Brown, 2007; Römbke, 2007). VEN (Drachenberg, 1992). monilicystis Michaelsen, 1892: 251, fig. 28; Pheretima BRA: RS (Knäpper and Porto, 1979; Krabbe et al., 1993): rodericensis: Michaelsen, 1900: 299, 318 (syn. dyeri, sinensis, Estrêla (Righi and Knäpper, 1965); São Leopoldo; Novo monilicystis, ?trinitatis). Hamburgo (Knäpper, 1967); Santa Cruz do Sul; Santana Amynthas rodericensis: Sims and Easton, 1972: 235; do Livramento; Gramado; Nova Petrópolis. Ivoti; Caxias Easton, 1982: 729; Sims and Gerard, 1985: 132 (syn. dyeri, do Sul; Estância Velha; Sapucaio; Canoas; Lajeado; sinensis). Tramandaí (Knäpper, 1972a); SC: Lauro Müller (Brown et Distribution: VEN (Drachenberg, 1992): Puerto Rico: al., 2006); PR (Chang, 1997; Sautter et al., 2006): Curitiba Saba (Righi, 1993); Aragua State: Parque Nacional Henri (Brown et al., 2006); SP (Righi, 1967b; Brown and James, Pittier: Rancho Grande (Righi, 1984); Caracas: Monte 2006): Piracicaba; São Paulo: Ipiranga (Lüderwaldt, 1927); Avila, 950 m (Righi, 1989). SUR (Gates, 1972; Fragoso RJ: Rio de Janeiro (Moreira, 1903); MG: Caetanópolis and Brown, 2007). FRG: Morne de Montabe (Cernosvitov, (Righi, 1980); BA: Salvador (Righi, 1971) (Figure 3A). 1934). GUY (Beddard, 1900; Cernosvitov, 1942) (Figure Further distribution: Central and North America, 3A). Atlantic Oceanic islands, Europe, Africa, Middle East, Further distribution: Caribbean region (Zicsi, 1995a), Asia, Australia, Hawaii, and Marquesas Islands (Righi, North America, Europe, Asia, Australia, and Pacific islands 1979). (Easton, 1982). Remarks: Blakemore et al. (2012) added this species Genus Metaphire Sims and Easton, 1972 to the Korean species biodiversity list as an exotic species Type: Rhodopis javanica Kinberg, 1867 (non from Korea. This species is also an exotic species from Woodwardia javanica Michaelsen, 1910 = Lennoscolex Brazil (Fragoso and Brown, 2007). Gates, 1960) 10. Metaphire houlleti (Perrier, 1872) 9. Metaphire californica (Kinberg, 1867) Perichaeta sp. Perrier, 1871: 278; Perichaeta houlleti Pheretima californica (part) Kinberg, 1867: 102 [excl. Perrier, 1872: 99, figs. 31–63; Beddard, 1887: 389; Megascolex Megascolex indicus Horst, 1883 (= A. corticis - see Easton, houlletii: Vaillant, 1889: 75; Perichaeta campanulata Rosa, 1981: 49)]; Perichaeta ringeana Michaelsen, 1890: 10; 1890: 115, t. 1, figs. 9–10; Perichaeta udekemi Michaelsen, 1899: 116; ?Perichaeta sluiteri Horst, 1890: 234, figs. 4–5; 1890: 240, t. 13, fig. 17; Perichaeta guillelmi Michaelsen, ?Perichaeta sumatrana: Beddard, 1892a: 155, Pl. IX, fig. 4. 1895: 32, fig. 7; Pheretima crescentica Fedarb, 1898: 447; ?non Megascolex sumatranus Horst, 1883: 189; Perichaeta Amyntas houlleti: Michaelsen, 1899: 12; Pheretima houlleti: hesperidum Beddard, 1892a: 169; Perichaeta guarini Rosa, Michaelsen, 1900: 273 (syn. campanulata, udekemi, 1894: 13; ?Perichaeta sandvicensis Beddard, 1896: 203; guillelmi); Amyntas kelantanensis Beddard, 1900: 902; Amyntas hesperidum: Beddard, 1900: 417; Pheretima browni Pheretima wimberleyana Stephenson, 1925: 62; Pheretima Stephenson, 1912: 273 (part excluding sexthecal morphs); houlleti var. tortuosa Gates, 1926: 454; Pheretima houlleti Pheretima kiangensis Michaelsen, 1931: 21; Pheretima var. rugosa Gates, 1926a: 157; Pheretima rugosa Gates, 1932: modesta Michaelsen, 1927: 88. [From Myanmar. Types 398; Pheretima campanulata var. penetralis Gates, 1931: 435; in Hamburg 10423]; Pheretima molesta Gates, 1932: 420; Pheretima campanulata var. meridiana Gates, 1932: 457; Pheretima sakaguchii Ohfuchi, 1938: 53, figs. 1–2; ?Pheretima ?Pheretima yapensis Ohfuchi, 1941: 283; Metaphire houlleti sonaiensis Ohfuchi, 1956; Pheretima californica: Michaelsen, houlleti: Sims and Easton, 1972: 238 (houlleti-group); 1900: 258, 275 (syn. ringeana, guarini, ?hesperidum). Metaphire houletti (lapsus pro houlleti): Easton, 1982: 731; Metaphire californica Sims and Easton, 1972: 238; Easton, 1983: 121, tab. 1, 128; Amynthas huangi James et al., 2005: 1981: 57 (syn. ?sakaguchii, ?sonaeiensis); Easton, 1982: 731; 1014, fig. 2E, 2F (on p. 1010). Sims and Gerard, 1985: 132, fig. 47c (syn. hesperidum). Metaphire houlleti (Blakemore, 2002, 2004, 2008, 2010). Distribution: ARG (Dulout et al., 1969b, 1969c; Levin Distribution: FRG: Père Island (Cernosvitov, 1934) et al., 1969; Mischis, 2004): From earth with bougainvillea (Figure 3A). plant in luggage arriving by plane in New York airport Further distribution: Central and North America, (Gates, 1982): Cordoba Prov. (Mischis, 1993): Sierras Europe, Africa, Asia, and Australia (Easton, 1982).

605 DE ASSIS et al. / Turk J Zool

Figure 3. Geographical distribution in South America: A) Amynthas rodericensis (circle), Metaphire californica (triangle), Metaphire houlletti (square), Metaphire posthuma (star), and Diplodricodrilus schmardae (square); B) excavatus (circle) and Pheretima darnleiensis (triangle); C) Pheretima bicincta (square) (new record from Brazil) and Polypheretima elongata (square); D) Polypheretima taprobanae (square) and litoralis (circle) from South America.

606 DE ASSIS et al. / Turk J Zool

11. Metaphire posthuma (Vaillant, 1868) Genus Pheretima Kinberg, 1867 Perichaeta posthuma Vaillant, 1868: 228; Perichaeta affinis Type: Pheretima montana Kinberg, 1867 Perrier, 1872: 106, fig. 66; Megascolex posthumus: Vaillant, 14. Pheretima (Pheretima) darnleiensis (Fletcher, 1899: 72, figs. 12–13;Pheretima posthuma: Michaelsen, 1886) 1900: 295; Pheretima incerta Beddard, 1912: 197; Pheretima Perichaeta darnleiensis Fletcher, 1886; Perichaeta posthuma: Stephenson, 1923: 309 (syn. affinis). cingulata (part, cf. A. robustus); Vaillant, 1868; Perichaeta Metaphire posthuma: Sims and Easton, 1972: 239; Sims darnleiensis (sic) Fletcher, 1886; Perichaeta vaillanti and Gerard, 1985: 132, fig. 47d. Beddard, 1890; Perichaeta martensi Michaelsen, 1892; Distribution: ARG: Buenos Aires Prov.: Buenos Aires Perichaeta bosschae Horst, 1893; Perichaeta martensi javana (Mischis, 2004; 2007) (Figure 3A). Michaelsen, 1894; Perichaeta darnleiensis: Beddard, 1895; Further distribution: Bahamas (Michaelsen, 1900a), Perichaeta padasensis Beddard & Fedarb, 1895; ?Perichaeta Mexico (Fragoso and Brown, 2007), Europe, Asia, Pacific atheca Rosa, 1896; Perichaeta eoa Rosa, 1896; Perichaeta Ocean, and Christmas Island (Michaelsen, 1900a). floweri Benham 1897; Perichaeta madelinae Benham Genus Duplodicodrilus Blakemore, 2008 1897; Perichaeta belli Rosa 1898; Amyntas padasensis Type: Duplodicodrilus schmardae (Horst, 1883) lokonensis Michaelsen, 1899; Pheretima decipiens Beddard, (Blakemore, 2008, 2010) 1912; Pheretima benguetensis Beddard, 1912; Pheretima 12. Duplodicodrilus schmardae (Horst, 1883) kuchingensis Stephenson, 1916; Pheretima borneoensis Ude, Megascolex schmardae Horst, 1883: 194; ?Perichaeta 1925; Pheretima indica birangi Michaelsen, 1928; Pheretima sumatrana: Beddard, 1892a: 155, Pl. IX, fig. 4; Perichaeta pugnatoris Hong & James, 2010; Pheretima tabukensis Hong trityphla Beddard, 1896: 205; ?Perichaeta vesiculata Goto & James, 2010. & Hatai, 1899: 21, figs. 13–15;Amyntas schmardae [sic]: Distribution: BRA: RS (Righi, 1965, 1980; Righi and Michaelsen, 1899: 13; Pheretima schmardae: Michaelsen, Knäpper, 1965): Porto Alegre (Knäpper, 1972a, 1972b); 1900: 302 (syn. trityphla); Pheretima kikuchii Hatai & PR (Chang, 1997; Sautter et al., 2006): Curitiba (Brown et Ohfuchi, 1936: 767; Metaphire schmardae schmardae: al., 2006); SP (Lüderwaldt, 1927; Lenko, 1972; Caballero, Sims & Easton, 1972: 239 (schmardae-group); Metaphire 1976; Brown and James, 2006): Campos do Jordão; São schmardae: Easton, 1981: 58. Sebastião; São Paulo; São José do Rio Preto; Engenheiro Duplodicodrilus schmardae; Blakemore, 2008: 22. Marsilac; Salesópolis (Brown et al., 2006); MG: Conceição Distribution: BRA (Righi, 1967b; Hauser et al., 1975): do Mato Dentro; Tripuí; near Ouro Preto (Righi, 1967b) RS (Knäpper, 1972b; Knäpper and Porto, 1979): Porto (Figure 3B). Alegre: Guaíba estuary (Knäpper, 1976); São Leopoldo Further distribution: Indo-Pacific (Blakemore, 2002, (Brown et al., 2006); Estância Velha; Canoas (Knäpper, 2010). 1972a); SC: Blumenau; Pomerode (Lüderwaldt, 1927); PR Genus Pithemera Sims & Easton, 1972 (Chang, 1997; Sautter et al., 2006): Curitiba (Brown et al., Type: Perichaeta bicincta Perrier, 1875 (= P. bicincta) 2006); SP (Brown and James, 2006): Cotia (Brown et al., 15. Pithemera bicincta (Perrier, 1875) 2006); São Paulo: Colina; RJ: Itatiaia National Park (Righi, Perichaeta bicincta Perrier, 1875; ?Perichaeta violacea 1980); Teresópolis (Michaelsen, 1927) (Figure 3A). Beddard, 1895a: 407; ?Perichaeta violacea Beddard, 1895; Further distribution: Central America (Righi, 1980), ?Pheretima aimerikiensis Ohfuchi, 1941; Pheretima bicincta: Europe, and Asia (Blakemore, 2008, 2010). Michaelsen, 1935b: 107. Genus Perionyx Perrier, 1872 Distribution: ARG (Fragoso and Brown, 2007). Type: Perrier, 1872 New record: Campina Grande, Paraíba, Northeast 13. Perionyx excavatus Perrier, 1872 Brazil. Perionyx gruenewaldi Michaelsen, 1891; Perionyx Further distribution: Asia, Pacific Islands (Blakemore, intermedius Beddard, 1892; Perionyx sp. Friend, 1911; 2002), Central America, Mexico (Fragoso and Brown, ?Perionyx koboensis Stephenson, 1914; Perionyx parvulus 2007), Madeira, Canary Islands (Talavera, 1990), Hungary Stephenson, 1916; Perionyx fulvus Stephenson, 1916; (Csuzdi et al., 2008), London and Dublin (Blakemore, ?Perionyx shillongensis Stephenson, 1920; ?Perionyx turaensis 2010). Stephenson, 1920. Examined material: 8 adult specimens collected Distribution: COL: Alcalá; Valle del Cauca Dep.: on 28 April 2009 in an urban area located in Campina Cartago (Feijoo, 2007) (Figure 3B). Grande (7°13′28.77″S, 35°52′2.74″W), State of Paraíba, Further distribution: Central America and Mexico northeastern Brazil (UFPB 1461) (Figure 3C). (Fragoso and Brown, 2007), Asia, Hawaii, Madagascar, Description: Length: 48–51 mm. Diameter: 2–2.5 Pacific, UK, USA, Australia, and (Blakemore, mm. Segments: 78–102. Prostomium: open epilobous. 1994, 2002). First dorsal pore: 12/13. Setae: perichaetine. Nephropores:

607 DE ASSIS et al. / Turk J Zool absent. Clitellum: 14(1/2)–16, annular, darker than and 4C). Nephridia: meroic. Gizzard: a single one in 8–10. the rest of the earthworm. Spermathecal pores: 5 pairs Hearts: 10–12. Calciferous glands: absent. Ovaries: a pair in 4/5/6/7/8/9. Female pores: closely paired on 14. in 13. Testes: 10 and 11, seminal vesicles paired in 11 and Male pores: a pair on conical porophores in 18. Genital 12. Prostate glands: opening in 18 and extending into 16– markings: absent (Figure 4A). Septa: 5/6–7/8 thickened, 19, racemose. Intestinal origin: 15, with a pair of ceca in 22 and 8/9 absent. Spermathecae: 5 pairs, 5–9 (Figures 4B (Figure 4D).

Figure 4. A) Pheretima bicincta, anterior body part in ventral view, spermathecal pores in 4/5/6/7/8/9, closely paired female pores on 14; B) dorsal view, 5 pairs of spermathecae in 5–9; C) spermatheca with a single diverticulum; D) 1 pair of ceca in 22.

608 DE ASSIS et al. / Turk J Zool

Remarks: Specimens of P. bicincta were found under Genus Pontodrilus Perrier, 1874 a grape tree sharing the same spot with Pontoscolex Type: Pontodrilus marionis Perrier, 1874 (= Lumbricus corethrurus (Müller, 1857) in the first 10-cm layer of soil. litoralis Grube, 1855) Genus Polypheretima Michaelsen, 1934 18. Pontodrilus litoralis (Grube, 1855) Type: Perichaeta stelleri Michaelsen, 1892 Lumbricus litoralis Grube, 1855: 127; ?[Pontoscolex 16. Polypheretima elongata (Perrier, 1872) arenicola Schmarda, 1861: 11 (?part); Pontodrilus marionis Perichaeta elongata Perrier, 1872: 124, fig. 70;Perichaeta Perrier, 1874: 1582; Pontodrilus bermudensis Beddard, biserialis Perrier, 1875: 1044; Megascolex elongata: Vaillant, 1891: 96; Cryptodrilus insularis Rosa, 1891: 387, fig. 1889: 81; Perichaeta acystis Beddard, 1895a: 423; Perichaeta 11 (of left prostate); Pontodrilus arenae Michaelsen, monocystis Horst, 1899: 202 (lapsus pro acystis Beddard, 1892: 222, fig. 9; Pontodrilus sp. Michaelsen, 1894: 184; 1895); Amynthas elongata: Beddard, 1900: 650; Pheretima Pontodrilus hesperidum Beddard, 1894: 37; Pontodrilus elongata: Michaelsen, 1900: 265; Metapheretima elongata: insularis: Beddard, 1895a: 471; Pontodrilus michaelseni Sims and Easton, 1972: 205 (syn. biserialis) in a species- Eisen, 1895: 73; Pontodrilus ephippiger Rosa, 1898: 277, complex. 281; Pontodrilus matsushimensis Iizuka, 1898: 21, Pl. II; Polypheretima elongata: Easton, 1979: 53; Easton, Pontodrilus ephippiger laysanianus Michaelsen, 1899: 217; 1981: 61 [syn. biserialis; non elongata: Ohfuchi, 1956 (= Pontodrilus matsushimensis chathamianus Michaelsen, Amynthas morrisi)]; Easton, 1984: 733. 1899: 220; Pontodrilus michaelseni hortensis Eisen, 1900: Distribution: PER (Perrier, 1872; Cernosvitov, 1934). 129, 241, figs.; Pontodrilus laccadivensis Beddard, 1903: COL: Valle Dep.: El Cerrito; Palmira; Guacarí (Feijoo, 374; Pontodrilus crosslandi Beddard, 1906: 561; Pontodrilus 2007); San Andrés Island (Reynolds and Reynolds, 2001). albanyensis Michaelsen, 1907a: 185; Pontodrilus VEN: Macuto, near Guayra (Cognetti, 1905); Maracay: bermudensis ephippiger: Stephenson, 1915: 145; Plutellus Experimental Station (Righi, 1989); Bolívar. FRG (Gates, (Pontodrilus) bermudensis: Michaelsen, 1922: 22; 1935: 1972). SUR: Paramaribo (Horst, 1899). GUY: Georgetown 106; Pontodrilus albanyensis var. cygni Jackson, 1931: 94; (Beddard and Feddarb, 1899); BRA: SP (Brown and Plutellus (Pontodrilus) matsushimensis indica Michaelsen, James, 2006; James and Brown, 2006): São Paulo: 1935: 106; Pontodrilus gracilis Gates, 1943: 100. Anhembi (Brown et al., 2006); RJ (Magalhães, 1905); MG: Pontodrilus litoralis: Beddard, 1895a: 469 (syn. Caetanópolis; Curvelo; Banheiro farm; Macacos waterfall; marionis); Michaelsen, 1900: 180 (syn. marionis); Capão Queimado farm (Righi, 1980); BA: Itajubá (Righi, Cognetti, 1901: 404; Michaelsen, 1910c: 89 (syn. marionis, 1971); PE: 50 km from Recife (Righi, 1980); RR (Lavelle crosslandi, albanyensis); Easton, 1984: 114, fig. 1f [syn. and Lapied, 2003) (Figure 3C). arenicola (part.), marionis, bermudensis, insularis, Further distribution: Central America (Gates, 1972), arenae, hesperidum, michaelseni, ephippiger, bermudensis Mexico (Fragoso and Brown, 2007), Africa, Asia, Australia, ephippiger.- Stephenson, 1915, matsushimensis, ephippiger and Pacific islands (Gates, 1972). laysanianus (syn. michaelseni hortensis), matsushimensis 17. Polypheretima taprobanae (Beddard, 1892) chathamianus, michaelseni hortensis, P. sp. Michaelsen, Perichaeta taprobanae Beddard, 1892a: 163; Perichaeta 1894, P. (P. ) sp. Michaelsen, 1930, laccadivensis, crosslandi, pauli Michaelsen, 1897: 234; Pheretima taprobanae typica: albanyensis, P. sp. Michaelsen, 1913, albanyensis cygni, Michaelsen, 1900: 308; Amynthas taprobanae: Beddard, matsushimensis indica, P. sp. Gates, 1936, gracilis]. 1900: 648 (syn. pauli); Pheretima taprobanae: Stephenson, Distribution: CHI: Galapagos Islands (Blakemore, 1923: 312; Metapheretima taprobanae: Sims and Easton, 2002). COL: Cartagena (Michaelsen, 1910). VEN: 1972: 233; Polypheretima taprobanae: Easton, 1979: 45 (syn. Morrocoy National Park: Playa Mero; Cayo Cico; Cayo pauli); Easton, 1982: 734. Sombrero (Easton, 1984; Righi, 1989; Zicsi, 1995a). BRA: Polypheretima taprobaena (laps.): Easton, 1979: 45. RS (Michaelsen, 1900b, 1910); SC: Florianópolis; São Distribution: ARG: Tucumán Prov.: Tucumán (Teisaire Francisco Island; SP (Lüderwaldt, 1927; Righi, 1967b; and Roldán, 1996; Mischis, 2004; Mischis and Herrera, Brown and James, 2006): Santos (Michaelsen, 1910); 2006). BRA (Moreira, 1903; Righi, 1965): RS (Righi and Itanhaém (Lüderwaldt, 1927); Cananéia, in mangrove Knäpper, 1965): Santa Cruz do Sul; São Leopoldo (Brown (Righi, 1968); RJ (Moreira, 1903); Angra dos Reis, in et al., 2006); Porto Alegre: Guaíba estuary (Knäpper, mangrove (Righi, 1968); PE: Itamaracá Island (Brown et 1976); SP: Piracicaba (Lüderwaldt, 1927; Righi, 1967b; al., 2006) (Figure 3D). Brown and James, 2006); RJ: Rio de Janeiro (Michaelsen, Further distribution: Atlantic, Indian, and Pacific 1927) (Figure 3D). oceans, fully marine (Easton 1984). Further distribution: Mexico (Fragoso and Brown, Remarks: Blakemore et al. (2012) added this species to 2007), Africa, Asia, Australia, and Pacific islands (Gates, Korean species biodiversity list as an exotic species from 1972), London (Blakemore, 2010, 2014). Korea.

609 DE ASSIS et al. / Turk J Zool

4. Discussion 2b. Esophageal glands unpaired in 9–11; paired None of the 18 species catalogued herein are endemic to calciferous glands in 13; several intestinal South America. Most of these species were transported gizzards...... Hyperiodrilus unintentionally, through soil or other materials that could 3a. Gizzard present...... 5 contain earthworms, probably soon after the establishment 3b. Gizzard absent or rudimentary...... 4 of trade routes between the Old and the New Worlds 4a. Prostates tubular; chaetae 8 per segment (i.e., (Brown et al., 2006; Blakemore, 2009). lumbricine); nephridia not holoic (absent from The habitat of Eudrilidae is probably the forests of anterior segments...... Pontodrilus central Africa. Eudrilus eugeniae has been introduced 4b. Prostate nontubular; holoic (i.e., 1 pair of nephridial in many other localities of the world. This species can tubules per segment); digestive system without ceca... only survive in temperatures above 10 °C and requires ...... Perionyx temperatures of 21–26 °C for (Sims and 5a. Intestinal ceca present...... 6 Gerard, 1985). Hyperiodrilus africanus is also considered 5b. Intestinal ceca absent; crescent markings an introduced species by Michaelsen (1910). It is common absent...... Polypheretima in western Africa, and its type species is from Kew Gardens. 6a. Intestinal ceca originating in or near 27...... 7 Megascolecid earthworms are widely distributed in 6b. Intestinal ceca originating in or near 22...... Pithemera South America and their presence on this continent most 7a. Male pores nonsuperficial within lateral apertures of of the time indicates disturbed by human activities. copulatory pouches...... 8 Amynthas gracilis is by far the most common species in 7b. Male pores superficial discharging directly onto the many areas. It has been known for over a century on this surface...... Amynthas continent, and it was first described for Brazil in 1867 by 8a. Spermathecal duct free of nephridia...... 9 Kinberg (Brown et al., 2006). The species listed herein represent threats to our 8b. Nephridia on spermathecal ducts...... Pheretima native species, leading to a loss in the diversity of local 9a. Large, eversible, and doubled intromittent organs earthworms. present...... Diplodricodrilus 9b. Intromittent organs absent, male pores not Taxonomic key to the genera of Eudrilidae and developed...... Metaphire Megascolecidae from South America. Adapted from Blakemore (2010). Acknowledgments 1a. Male pore on 17; spermathecae absent from The authors heartily thank Dr Robert J Blakemore pretesticular segments; as coelomic cavities (Biodiversity Laboratory, College of Natural Science, combining with ovaries (“euprostate” present, holoic, Hanyang University, Seoul, South Korea) and Alexander setae lumbricine)...... Eudrilidae...... 2 Feijoo M (Universidad Tecnológica de Pereira, Apartado 1b. Male pore on 18; spermathecae present in pretesticular Aéreo 97, Pereira, Colombia) for valuable contributions segments (prostates tubular to racemose), to the manuscript. Many thanks to Jürgen Römbke for nephridia holoic or meroic; setae lumbricine to providing us an important reference on earthworms. perichaetine...... Megascolecidae...... 3 Finally, we acknowledge CNPq and FACEPE for the 2a. Esophageal glands unpaired in 10 and 11, paired postdoctoral fellowship to JE De Assis and a productivity calciferous glands in 12; single esophageal grant to ML Christoffersen (CNPq Proc. N. 302388/2014- gizzard...... Eudrilus 1).

References

Alderete-De-Majo AM (2002a). Gametogenesis masculina en Alderete-De-Majo AM (2002c). Gametogenesis masculina en Oligochaeta Megascolecidae. III: Analisis citoquimico del Oligochaeta, Megascolecidae. II: Espermatogenesis en citoforo durante el desarrollo de la espermatogenesis de ejemplares no clitellados de Amynthas hawayanus (Rosa, 1891), Amynthas hawayanus (Rosa, 1891) de la provincia de Tucumán, Amynthas morrisi (Beddard, 1892) y Metaphire californica Argentina. Acta Zool Lilloana 46: 93-100 (in Spanish). (Kinberg, 1867) de la provincia de Tucumán, Argentina. Acta Zool Lilloana 46: 67-70 (in Spanish). Alderete-De-Majo AM (2002b). Gametogenesis masculina en Alderete-De-Majo AM (2003a). Gametogenesis masculina en Oligochaeta, Megascolecidae. I: Espermatogenesis normal Oligochaeta: Megascolecidae. IV: Analysis de aspectos de Amynthas hawayanus (Rosa, 1891), Amynthas morrisi controvertidos de la espermatogenesis de Amynthas hawayanus (Beddard, 1892) y Metaphire californica (Kinberg, 1867) de la (Rosa, 1891), Amynthas morrisi (Beddard, 1892) y Metaphire provincia de Tucumán, Argentina. Acta Zool Lilloana 46: 5-21 californica (Kinberg, 1867) de la provincia de Tucumán, (in Spanish). Argentina. Acta Zool Lilloana 47: 3-14 (in Spanish).

610 DE ASSIS et al. / Turk J Zool

Alderete-De-Majo AM (2003b). Gametogenesis masculina en Blakemore RJ (2014). Miscellaneous earthworm types in the Oligochaeta: Megascolecidae. V: Espermatogenesis anormal Natural History Museum, London (Annelida: Oligochaeta: en ejemplares parasitados por Gregarinas (Sporozoa, Megadrilacea: Eudrilidae, Lumbricidae, Megascolecidae, Eugregariinida) de Amynthas hawayanus (Rosa, 1891), Moniligastridae, Octochaetidae). Opusc Zool Budapest 45: Amynthas morrisi (Beddard, 1892) y Metaphire californica 119-155. (Kinberg, 1867) de la provincia de Tucumán, Argentina. Acta Blakemore RJ, Cho JL, Park TS (2012). Six exotic terrestrial Zool Lilloana 47: 53-57 (in Spanish). earthworms (Oligochaeta: Megadrilacea: Moniligastridae, Beddard FE (1887). Contributions to the anatomy of earthworms. P Lumbricidae, Ocnerodrilidae and Megascolecidae) newly Zool Soc Lond 1887: 372-392. added to Korean species biodiversity list. Zootaxa 3368: 300- Beddard FE (1893). Two new genera and some new species of 304. earthworms. Quart J Microsc Sci 34: 243-278. Brown GG, Benito NP, Pasini A, Sautter KD, Guimarães MD, Torres Beddard FE (1895). Preliminary account of new species of E (2003). No-tillage greatly increases earthworm populations Earthworms belonging to the Hamburg Museum. P Zool Soc in Paraná State, Brazil. Pedobiologia 47: 764-771. Lond 1895: 210-239. Brown GG, James SW (2006). Earthworm biodiversity in São Paulo Beddard FE (1900). A revision of the earthworms of the genus state, Brazil. Eur J Soil Biol 42: 145-149. Amynthas (Perichaeta). P Zool Soc Lond 1900: 609-652. Brown GG, James SW, Pasini A, Nunes DH, Benito NP, Martins PT, Beddard FE, Feddarb SM (1899). Notes on two earthworms, Sautter KD (2006). Exotic, peregrine, and invasive earthworms Perichaeta biserialis and Trichochaeta hesperidium. P Zool Soc in Brazil: diversity, distribution, and effects on and plants. Lond 1899: 803-809. Carib J Sci 42: 339-358. Blakemore RJ (1994). Earthworms of south-east and Brown GG, James SW, Sautter KD, Pasini A, Benito NP, Nunes DH, their agronomic potential in brigalow soils. PhD, University of Korasaki V, Santos EF, Matsumura C, Martins PT et al. (2004). Queensland, Brisbane, Australia. Avaliação das populações de minhocas como bioindicadores Blakemore RJ (1997). First ‘common earthworm’ found in . ambientais no norte e leste do Estado do Paraná. In: Saraiva Invertebrata 9: 1-5. OF, editor. Resultados de pesquisa da Embrapa soja 2003: manejo de solos, plantas daninhas e agricultura de precisão. Blakemore RJ (2000). Tasmanian Earthworms. CD-ROM Série Documento 253. Londrina, Brazil: Embrapa Soja, pp. 33- Monograph with Review of World Families. Canberra, 46 (in Portuguese). Australia: VermEcology. Burela S, Cazzaniga NJ (2001). Earthworms from southern Buenos Blakemore RJ (2002). Cosmopolitan Earthworms: An Eco- Aires province, Argentina. Megadrilogica 8: 49-52. Taxonomic Guide to the Peregrine Species of the World. 426 CD-ROM. 2nd ed. Canberra, Australia: VermEcology. Caballero MES (1976). Bionomia de Oligochaeta terrestres da região Blakemore RJ (2004). Checklist of New Zealand earthworms updated norte-ocidental do Estado de Săo Paulo, Brasil. Ciên Cult 28: from Lee (1959). In: Moreno AG, Borges S, editors. Avances 762-765 (in Portuguese). en taxonomia de lombrices de tierra/Advances in Earthworm Cernosvitov L (1934). Les Oligochètes de la Guyane Française et Taxonomy (Annelida: Oligochaeta). Madrid, Spain: Editorial d’autres pays de l’Amerique du Sud. Bull Mus Nat Hist Nat Paris Complutense, Universidad Complutense, pp. 175-185. 22: 47-59 (in French). Blakemore RJ (2008). Review of Oriental pheretimoid (Pheretima Cernosvitov L (1935). Oligochètes. Expedition Antarctique Belge. auct.: Megascolecidae) taxa with description of a new genus. Resultats du Voyage de la Belgica en 1897-99. Rap Scient 5: [Duplodicodrilus gen. nov. (Oligochaeta: Megascolecidae)]. 1-11 (in French). In: Pavlicek T, Cardet P, editors. Advances in Earthworm Taxonomy III. Proceedings of IOTM3. Nicosia, Cyprus: Cernosvitov L (1942). Oligochaeta from various parts of the world. P Ministry of , Natural Resources and Environment Zool Soc Lond 111: 197-236. of the Republic of Cyprus, pp. 23-36. Chang YC (1997). Minireview: natural history of Amynthas Blakemore RJ (2009). Cosmopolitan earthworms – a global and hawayanus. Act Biol Paran 26: 39-50. historical perspective. In: Shain DH, editor. as Model Cognetti L (1905). Gli Oligochaeti della regione neotropicale. I. Mem Systems in the Biological Sciences. New York, NY, USA: John Acc Rea Scie Tor Ser 2: 1-72 (in Italian). Wiley and Sons, pp. 257-283. Cordero EH (1931). Notas sobre los oligoquetos del Uruguay. Anal Blakemore RJ (2010). Cosmopolitan Earthworms: An Eco- Mus Nac Hist Nat Bern Rivad 36: 343-357 (in Spanish). taxonomic Guide to the Peregrine Species of the World. 839 CD-ROM. 4th Ed. Yokohama: VermEcology. Csuzdi CT, Pavlíček T, Nevo E (2008). Is Dichogaster bolaui (Michaelsen, 1891) the first domicole earthworm species? Eur Blakemore RJ (2013). Megascolex (Perichaeta) diffringens Baird, J Soil Biol 44: 198-201. 1869 and Pheretima pingi Stephenson, 1925 types compared to the Amynthas corticis (Kinberg, ‘867) and A. carnosus (Goto Dionísio JA, Ranck BCB, Santos A, Silveira VI, Santos HR (1995). and Hatai, 1899) species-groups (Oligochaeta: Megadrilacea: Avaliação da população de Oligochaeta terrestre em áreas Megascolecidae). J Spec Res 2: 99-126. degradadas. Rev Set Ciên Agrá 13: 35-40 (in Portuguese).

611 DE ASSIS et al. / Turk J Zool

Drachenberg ACE (1992). Morphology and taxonomy of three Gates GE (1954). Exotic earthworms of the United States. Bul Mus representatives of the family Megascolecidae (Annelida Comp Zool 111: 217-258. Oligochaeta) from Venezuela. Mem Soc Cien Nat La Salle 52: Gates GE (1972). Burmese earthworms: an introduction to the 105-112. systematics and biology of megadrile oligochaetes with special Dulout FN, Levin M, Tomsic Z, Moreno AR (1969a). La reference to Southeast Asia. T Am Philos Soc 62: 1-326. espermatogenesis de Pheretima hawayana Rosa Gates GE (1982). Farewell to North American megadriles. (Megascolecidae, Oligochaeta). Rev Argen Agron 7: 603-613 Megadrilogica 4: 12-77. (in Spanish). Guerra RT, Silva EG (1994). Estudo das comunidades de minhocas Dulout FN, Tomsic Z, Moreno AR, Levin M (1969b). Estudios (Annelida, Oligochaeta) em alguns ambientes terrestres do cromosómicos en Pheretima californica Kinberg Estado da Paraíba. Rev Nord Biol 9: 209-223 (in Portuguese). (Megascolecidae, Oligochaeta). Act Zool Lilloana 24: 173-176 (in Spanish). Hauser J, Boccasius B, Kessler R (1975). Eine neuartige form von bindegewebe bei Pheretima schmardae (Horst, 1883) Dulout FN, Tomsic Z, Moreno AR, Levin M (1969c). Los tipos (Oligochaeta: Prosopora, Megascolecidae) (Beiträge zur celulares en la espermatogenesis de Pheretima californica Anneliden-Histologie). Ber Nat-Med Verein Innsbruck 62: 53- Kinberg (Megascolecidae, Oligochaeta). Act Zool Lilloana 24: 62 (in German). 177-182 (in Spanish). Horst R (1899). On the variability of characters in Perichaetidae. Not Easton E (1984). Earthworms (Oligochaeta) from islands of the Leyd Mus 20: 201-209. south-western Pacific, and a note on two species from Papua New Guinea. New Zeal J Zool 11: 111-128. James SW (1995). Systematics, biogeography and ecology of Nearctic earthworms from Eastern, Central, Southern and Southwestern Easton EG (1982). Australian pheretimoid earthworms United States. In: Hendrix PF, editor. Earthworm Ecology and (Megascolecidae: Oligochaeta): a synopsis with the description Biogeography in North America. Boca Raton, FL, USA: Lewis of a new genus and five new species. Austr J Zool 30: 711-735. Publishers, pp. 29-52. Eisen G (1900). Researches in the American Oligochaeta, with James SW, Brown GG (2006). Earthworm ecology and diversity in special reference to those of the Pacific coast and adjacent Brazil. In: Moreira FMS, Siqueira JO, Brussaard L, editors. Soil islands. Proceedings of the California Academy of Sciences 2: Biodiversity in Amazonian and Other Brazilian Ecosystems. 85-276. Wallingford, UK: CABI Publishing, pp. 56-116. Feijoo A (2007). Lombrices de tierra (Annelida, Oligochaeta) del Jorge FB, Sawaya MC (1967). Comparative biochemical studies on Parque Nacional Sumapáz, Colombia. In: Van Der Hammen the oligochaetes Pheretima hawayana, Glossoscolex grandis, T, Dos Santos AG, editors. Studies on Tropical Andean and Rhinodrilus sp. Comp Bioch Physis 22: 359-369. Ecosystems 7. Berlin, Germany: J. Cramer, pp. 615-675 (in Spanish). Kinberg JGH (1867). Annulata nova. Öfver Kong Vetenskaps- Akademiens 23: 97-103 (in Swedish). Feijoo A, Knapp EB, Lavelle P, Moreno A (1999). Quantifying soil macrofauna in a Colombian watershed. Pedobiologia 43: 513- Knäpper CFU (1976). Preliminary considerations on the occurrence 517. of oligochaetes in the estuary of the Guaíba, RS. Est Leopold 38: 39-41. Feijoo A, Quintero H, Fragoso C (2006). Earthworm communities in forest and pasture of the Colombian Andes. Carib J Sci 42: Knäpper CFU (1977). Ecological niches of P. diffringens (Baird, 301-310. 1869) and E. lucens (Waga, 1857) at São Francisco de Paula. Est Leopold 42: 194-196. Feijoo A, Quintero H, Fragoso C, Moreno A (2004). Patrón de distribuición y listado de especies de las lombrices de tierra Knäpper CFU, Porto RP (1979). Ocorrência de oligoquetas nos (Annelida, Oligochaeta) en Colombia. Act Zool Mex 20: 197- solos do Rio Grande do Sul. Act Biol Leopold 1: 137-166 (in 220 (in Spanish). Portuguese). Fragoso C, Brown GG (2007). Ecología y taxonomía de las Knäpper JGH (1967). Desenvolvimento assimétrico de próstatas em lombrices de tierra en Latinoamérica: El primer Encuentro Pheretima. Ciên Cult 19: 349-350 (in Portuguese). Latino-Americano de Ecología y Taxonomía de Oligoquetos Knäpper JGH (1972a). Dominanzverhältnisse der verschieden Arten (ELAETAO1). In: Brown GG, Fragoso C, editors. Minhocas na der Gattung Pheretima in Kulturböden von Rio Grande do Sul. América Latina: biodiversidade e ecologia. Londrina, Brazil: Pedobiologia 12: 23-25 (in German). Embrapa Soja, pp. 33-75 (in Portuguese). Knäpper JGH (1972b). Oligoquetas terrestres – uma moderna Fragoso C, James SW, Borges S (1995). Native earthworms of the avaliação. Inst Andr Vois 1: 11-19 (in Portuguese). North Neotropical region: current status and controversies. In: Kobiyama M, Barbik C, Santos HR (1995). Influência da minhoca Hendrix PF, editor. Earthworm Ecology and Biogeography in (Amynthas hawayanus) sobre a produção de matéria seca de North America. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press, pp. 67-115. bracatinga (Mimosa scabrella Benth). Rev Set Ciên Agrár 13: Gates GE (1942), Checklist and bibliography of North American 199-203 (in Portuguese). earthworms. Am Midl Nat 27: 86-108.

612 DE ASSIS et al. / Turk J Zool

Krabbe EL, Driemeyer DJ, Antoniolli I, Giracca EMN (1993). Mischis CC (1999). Comunidades de lombrices (Oligochaeta) en Avaliação populacional de oligoquetas e características físicas diferentes ambientes de las Sierras Chicas, Córdoba, Argentina. do solo em diferentes sistemas de cultivo. Ciên Rur 23: 21-26 Iher Sér Zool 87: 19-28 (in Spanish). (in Portuguese). Mischis CC (2004). Lombrices de tierra de Argentina: aspectos Lauría De Cidre L (1972). Consideraciones anátomo-histopatológicas faunísticos y biogeograficos. In: Moreno AG, Borges S, editors. del tubo digestivo de Pheretima hawayana (Oligochaeta, Avances in taxonomía de lombrices de tierra. Madrid, Spain: Megascolecidae). Physis 31: 551-558 (in Spanish). Editorial Complutense, pp. 261-274. Lavelle P, Lapied E (2003). Endangered earthworms of Amazonia: Mischis CC (2007). Catálogo de las lombrices de tierra de la an homage to Gilberto Righi: the 7th International Symposium Argentina (Annelida, Oligochaeta). In: Brown GG, Fragoso on Earthworm Ecology; Cardiff, Wales, 2002. Pedobiologia 47: C, editors. Minhocas na América Latina: biodiversidade e 419-427. ecologia. Londrina, Brazil: Embrapa Soja, pp. 247-252 (in Lenko K (1972). Minhocas e sanguessugas (Annelida: Oligochaeta Portuguese). and Hirudinea) em ninhos de Camponotus rufipes (Insecta, Mischis CC, Brigada AM (1985). The earthworms (Annelida, Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Ver Bras Entom 16: 7-12 (in Oligochaeta) from the Province of San Luis (Argentina). Part I. Portuguese). Megadrilogica 4: 133-134. Levin M, Moreno AR, Tomsic Z, Dulout F (1969). Histofisiología del Mischis CC, Csuzdi C, Arguello G, Herrera JAD (2006). A epitelio digestivo de Pheretima californica Kinberg. Act Zool contribution to the knowledge of earthworm fauna (Annelida, Lilloana 24: 21-31 (in Spanish). Oligochaeta) from the Argentinian Patagonia. In: Pop VV, Lima ACRD, Rodriguez C (2007). Earthworm diversity from Rio Pop AA, editors. Advances in Earthworm Taxonomy, II. Cluj- Grande do Sul, Brazil, with a new native criodrilid genus and Napoca, Romania: Cluj University Press, pp. 173-182. species (Oligochaeta: Criodrilidae). Megadrilogica 11: 9-20. Mischis CC, Herrera JAD (2006). Review of the distribution of Ljungström PO, De Priano JA, Orellana JJ (1973). Influence of exotic earthworms (Annelida, Oligochaeta) in Argentina and some edaphic factors on earthworm distribution in Santa Fé confirmed examples of their introduction. Carib J Sci 42: 285- Province, Argentina. Pedobiologia 13: 236-247. 293. Lüderwaldt H (1927). A coleção de minhocas (Oligochaeta) do Mischis CC, Righi G (1999). Contribution to knowledge of the Museu Paulista com notas biológicas. Rev Mus Paul 15: 545- oligochaete fauna (Annelida, Oligochaeta) from Argentina. 556 (in Portuguese). Gayana 63: 11-13. Magalhães PS (1905). Notes d’helminthologie brésilienne. Arch Moreira C (1903). Vermes oligoquetos do Brasil. Arch Mus Nac Rio Paras 9: 305-318 (in French). de Janeiro 12: 125-136 (in Portuguese). Mercadal Del Barrio IT, Barrio A (1988). New records and other Nakamura M (1992). An ecological study of earthworms in Papua citations of earthworms (Oligochaeta) for Argentina. Physis New Guinea – with some comparisons of Hawaiian earthworm 46: 1-4. fauna. Rep Chuo Univer 13: 19-33. Michaelsen W (1892). Terricolen der Berliner Zoologischen Nunes DH, Pasini A, Benito NP, Brown GG (2006). Earthworm Sammlung. II. Arch Natu 58: 209-261 (in German). diversity in four land use systems in the region of Jaguapitã, Michaelsen W (1900a). Das Tierreich 10: Vermes, Oligochaeta. Paraná State, Brazil. Carib J Sci 42: 331-338. Berlin, Germany: Friedländer and Sohn (in German). Omodeo P (2000). Evolution and biogeography of megadriles Michaelsen W (1900b). Zur kenntnis der geoscoleciden Südamerikas. (Annelida, Clitellata). Ital J Zool 67: 179-201. Zool Anz 23: 53-56 (in German). Peixoto RT, Marochi AI (1996). A influência da minhoca Pheretima Michaelsen W (1903). Neue Oligochaeten und neue Fundorte sp. nas propriedades de um latossolo vermelho escuro álico e altbekannter. Mitt Natur us Hamb 19: 1-55 (in German). no desenvolvimento de culturas em sistema de plantio direto, em Arapoti-PR. Rev Plan Dir 35: 23-25 (in Portuguese). Michaelsen W (1910). Oligochaeten von verschiedenen Gebieten. Mitt Natur Mus Hamb 27: 47-169 (in German). Perrier E (1872). Recherches pour servir a l’histoire des lombriciens terrestres. Nouv Arch Mus Hist Nat Par 8: 5-198 (in French). Michaelsen W (1927). Die oligochätenfauna Brasiliens. Sonder Abhand Sencken Gesell 40: 369-374 (in German). Reynolds JW (1994). Earthworms of the world. Glob Biod 4: 11-16. Michaelsen W (1935). Die opisthoporen oligochäten Westindiens. Reynolds JW, Reynolds DW (2001). Primeros datos de lombrices Mitt Natur Mus Hamb 45: 51-64 (in German). de tierre (Oligochaeta) de la Isla de san Andres, Colombia. Mischis CC (1992). The first record of the species Amynthas Megadrilogica 8: 21-24 (in Spanish). diffringens (Baird, 1869) (Oligochaeta: Megascolecidae) in the Righi G (1965). Ocorrencia de Pheretima (Pheretima) indica (Host, province of Cordoba (Argentina). Megadrilogica 4: 143-144. 1883) no Brasil. Ciên Cult 17: 225-226 (in Portuguese). Mischis CC (1993). A contribution to the knowledge of megascolecid Righi G (1967a). Eudrilus eugeniae (Kinberg, 1867): oligochaeta fauna (Annelida, Oligochaeta) from the Province of Córdoba, terrícola novo para o Brasil. Ciên Cult 19: 341-342 (in Argentina. Megadrilogica 5: 9-12. Portuguese).

613 DE ASSIS et al. / Turk J Zool

Righi G (1967b). O genero Pheretima Kinberg, 1867 no Brasil Sims RW, Gerard BM (1985). Earthworms: Keys and Notes to the (Oligochaeta, Megascolecidae). Ciên Cult 19: 342-343 (in Identification and Study of the Species. London, UK: Synopsis Portuguese). of the British Fauna. Righi G (1968). Sobre alguns Oligochaeta do Brasil. Rev Bras Biol 28: Talavera JA (1990). Peregrine earthworms from the Canary Archipelago 369-382 (in Portuguese). (Oligochaeta, Megascolecidae). Ital J Zool 57:159-164. Righi G (1971). Sobre alguns Oligochaeta brasileiros. Pap Avul Zool Tanck BCB, Santos HR, Dionísio JA (2000). Influência de diferentes 25: 1-14 (in Portuguese). sistemas de uso e manejo do solo sobre a flutuação populacional do oligoqueta edáfico Amynthas spp. Rev Bras Ciên Sol 24: Righi G (1972). Contribuição ao conhecimento dos Oligochaeta 409-415 (in Portuguese). brasileiros. Pap Avul Zool 25: 149-166 (in Portuguese). Teisaire ES (1991). Histologia de la gonada feminina de Amynthas Righi G (1978). Alguns Oligochaeta megadriles da Argentina. Fave 1: diffringens (Baird) (Oligochaeta: Megascolecidae), une especie 167-178 (in Portuguese). partenogenetica. Physis 47: 31-38 (in Spanish). Righi G (1979). Introducción al estudio de las lombrices del Teisaire ES, Roldán IA (1995). Ultrastructure and histochemistry of suelo (oligoquetos megadrilos) de la provincia de Santa Fe the spermatheca of Amynthas Kinberg and Metaphire Sims and (Argentina). Rev Asoc Cien Nat Litor 2: 89-151 (in Spanish). Easton (Oligochaeta: Megascolecidae). Comun Biol 13: 169-181. Righi G (1980). Alguns megadrile (Oligochaeta, Annelida) Teisaire ES, Roldán IA (1996). Lombrices de tierra de la provincia de brasileiros. Bol Zool 5: 1-18 (in Portuguese). Tucumán (Annelida: Oligochaeta): guia para la recoleccion e Righi G (1984). Nova contribuição ao conhecimento dos Oligochaeta identificacion. Fund Mig Lillo 101: 1-24 (in Spanish). da Venezuela. Pap Avul Zool 35: 243-256 (in Portuguese). Teisaire ES, Roldán IA, Moreno A, López-De-Aragón M (2003). Righi G (1989). Adição ao conhecimento dos Oligochaeta da Registros preliminares sobre la oligoquetofauna de Los Toldos, Venezuela. Rev Bras Biol 49: 1065-1084 (in Portuguese). Dpto. Santa Victoria, Salta (Argentina). In: Actas de las XX Jornadas Cientificas de la Asociacion de Biologia de Tucumán, Righi G (1993). Some Megadrili-Oligochaeta of the Caribbean pp. 213-218 (in Spanish). region. Rev Suis Zool 100(1): 137-142. Vannucci M (1953). On the glossoscoscolecid earthworm Pontoscolex Righi G, Knäpper CFU (1965). O gênero Pheretima Kinberg, no corethrurus. Dusenia 4: 287-300. Estado de Rio Grande do Sul. Rev Bras Biol 25: 419-427 (in Portuguese). Voss M (1986). Populações de minhocas em diferentes sistemas de plantio. Rev Plan Dir 4: 6-7 (in Portuguese). Righi G, Römbke J (1987). Alguns Oligochaeta da Bolívia e do Peru. Rev Bras Biol 47: 523-534 (in Portuguese). Zicsi A (1993). Neue und bekannte Regenwürmer aus Chile (Oligochaeta) Regenwürmer aus Südamerika 19. Rev Suis Zool Römbke J (2007). Taxonomy and biogeography of Peruvian 100: 627-640 (in German). earthworms. In: Brown GG, Fragoso C, editors. Minhocas na América Latina: biodiversidade e ecologia. Londrina, Brazil: Zicsi A (1995a). Ein weiterer beitrag zur regenwurm – fauna der Embrapa Soja, pp. 201-206. Karibischen Region (Oligochaeta). Regenwürmer aus Südamerika 24. Mitt Hambur Zool Mus Inst 92: 53-63 (in German). Rosa D (1891). Die exotischen Terricolen des k. k. naturhistorischen Hofmuseums. Ann k. k. Natur Hofmus Wien 6: 379-406 (in Zicsi A (1995b). Regenwürmer aus Bolivien (Oligochaeta): German). regenwürmer aus Südamerika 23. Rev Suis Zool 102: 585-608 (in German). Sautter KD, Brown GG, James SW, Pasini A, Nunes DH, Benito NP Zicsi A (2004). Die regenwurmfauna Chiles mit bestimmungsschlussen (2006). Present knowledge on earthworm biodiversity in the der Chilota, Yagansia und Eodrilus arten (Oligochaeta: State of Paraná, Brazil. Eur J Soil Biol 42: 296-300. Acanthodrilidae), Regenwürmer aus Sudamerika 40. Ber Natur- Sautter KD, Tanck BCB, Dionísio JA, Santos HR (1995). Estudo da mediz Ver Innsbr 91: 111-128 (in German). população de Oribatei (Acari: Cryptostignata), Collembola Zicsi A (2007). An annotated checklist of the earthworms of (Insecta) e Oligochaeta, em diferentes ambientes de um solo Ecuador (Oligochaeta). Earthworms from South America. In: degradado pela mineraçăo de xisto a céu aberto. Rev Set Ciên Brown GG, Fragoso C, editors. Minhocas na América Latina: Agrár 13: 171-174 (in Portuguese). biodiversidade e ecologia. Londrina, Brazil: Embrapa Soja, pp. Sims RW (1987). A review of the Central African earthworm family 297-353. Eudrilidae (Oligochaeta). In: Pagliai M, Omodeo P, editors. On Zicsi A, Csuzdi C (1988). Über einige Thamnodrilusarten und andere Earthworms: Selected Symposia and Monographs. Modena, regenwürmer aus Ekuador (Oligochaeta: Glossoscolecidae, Italy: Mucchi, pp. 359-388. Lumbricidae, Megascolecidae). Regenwürmer aus Südamerika Sims RW, Easton EG (1972). A numerical revision of the earthworm 3. Opus Zool 23: 209-218 (in German). genus Pheretima auct. (Megascolecidae: Oligochaeta) with the Zicsi A, Csuzdi C (1999). Neue und bekannte regenwürmer aus recognition of new genera and an appendix on the earthworms verschiedenen teilen Südamerikas (Annelida, Oligochaeta: collected by the Royal Society North Borneo Expedition. Biol Glossoscolecidae, Acanthodrilidae, Megascolecidae). Senck J Lin Soc 4: 169-268. Biol 78: 123-134 (in German).

614