DOCSLIB.ORG

Experimental Proof of the Reciprocal Relation Between Spin Peltier and Spin Seebeck Effects in a Bulk YIG/Pt Bilayer

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Experimental Proof of the Reciprocal Relation Between Spin Peltier and Spin Seebeck Effects in a Bulk YIG/Pt Bilayer www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Experimental proof of the reciprocal relation between spin Peltier and spin Seebeck efects Received: 4 October 2018 Accepted: 8 January 2019 in a bulk YIG/Pt bilayer Published: xx xx xxxx Alessandro Sola 1, Vittorio Basso1, Michaela Kuepferling1, Carsten Dubs 2 & Massimo Pasquale 1 We verify for the frst time the reciprocal relation between the spin Peltier and spin Seebeck efects in a bulk YIG/Pt bilayer. Both experiments are performed on the same YIG/Pt device by a setup able to accurately determine heat currents and to separate the spin Peltier heat from the Joule heat background. The sample-specifc value for the characteristics of both efects measured on the present YIG/Pt bilayer is (6.2 ± 0.4) × 10−3 KA−1. In the paper we also discuss the relation of both efects with the intrinsic and extrinsic parameters of YIG and Pt and we envisage possible strategies to optimize spin Peltier refrigeration. Te reciprocal relations of thermodynamics are a fundamental tool to analyze and understand the physics of transport phenomena1. Since the beginning of the 19th century it was clear to Jean Charles Athanase Peltier and later demonstrated by Lord Kelvin, that for a material at a given absolute temperature T a relation exists between the Seebeck coefcient ε (given by the ratio between the measured electromotive force and the applied tempera- ture diference) and the Peltier coefcient ∏ (the ratio between the measured heat current and the applied electric current): ∏ = εT 2,3. Tis remarkable reciprocity was later found to be part of a wider set of relations, as theoret- ically demonstrated by Onsager under the assumption of the reversibility of the microscopic physical processes governing macroscopic non-equilibrium thermodynamic efects4. Reciprocal relations can also be used to analyze transport phenomena which involve not only the electric charge and the heat, but also the spin. Spincaloritronic phenomena5–7 can provide additional tools to the feld of spintronics, envisioned to be a faster and lower energy consuming alternative to classical electronics8. One of the key building blocks for “spintronic circuits” is the spin battery, a device which can drive a spin current into an external circuit. Spin batteries are fundamental for spintronic devices and may be developed exploiting spincal- oritronic efects9. Spincaloritronic devices may also be used in the development of novel thermoelectric heaters/ coolers operating at the microscale10,11. Te idea of a reciprocity between heat and spin was initially proposed and proven for metals where the spin current is carried by electrons12, but such a reciprocal relation cannot be easily proven in the case of ferrimagnetic insulators where the spin current is carried by thermally excited spin waves13. A typical device, where spincaloritronic efects are found and can be exploited for experiments, is a bilayer made of a ferrimagnetic insulator (e.g. yttrium iron garnet, YIG) and a non magnetic metal with a strong spin-orbit coupling (e.g. platinum, Pt)14. In these devices the spin current is generated longitudinally (along the x axis), normal to the flm surface. In the case of devices which exhibit the spin Peltier efect (SPE) a longitudinal (x axis) heat current is gener- ated, caused by the fow of a transverse (y axis) electric current in the Pt layer13. Conversely, in the case of the spin Seebeck efect (SSE) a transverse (y axis) electric voltage is generated in the Pt layer and caused by the longitudinal temperature gradient parallel to the spin current (x axis)15. Although experimental evidence of both efects has been already obtained16,17, the quantitative demonstration of their reciprocity and the connection with intrinsic properties of the layers, has yet to be proven13,18–20. To this end here we provide the frst experimental evidence of the reciprocal relation between the thermal and the electric quantities associated to the SPE and the SSE in a bulk YIG/Pt bilayer. Te relation for a YIG/Pt bilayer has the following form21,22 1Istituto Nazionale di Ricerca Metrologica, Strada delle Cacce 91, 10135, Torino, Italy. 2INNOVENT e.V., Technologieentwicklung, Prüssingstrasse. 27B, 07745, Jena, Germany. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to A.S. (email: [email protected]) SCIENTIFIC REPORTS | (2019) 9:2047 | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-38687-4 1 www.nature.com/scientificreports/ Figure 1. (a) Geometry of the YIG/Pt bilayer with tYIG = 0.545 mm, Ly = 4.95 mm, Lz = 3.91 mm and tPt = 5 nm. (b,c) schemes of the device in the SPE and SSE confgurations. Heat currents and magnetic moment currents are along x (longitudinal direction), electric efects are along y (transverse direction), the magnetic feld and the magnetization are along z. (d,e) sketches of the experimental setup for SPE and SSE, respectively. (f) Experimental result of the SPE heat current, −Iq,SP , as function of the electric current Ie,y at positive magnetic saturation. (g) Experimental result of the SSE voltage ΔVe,y as function of the heat current Iq,x at positive magnetic saturation. −Δ T ΔVe,y SP,x = T Ie,y Iq,x (1) Te lef hand side of Eq. (1) refers to the SPE: ΔTSP,x is the temperature diference generated across the YIG layer as consequence of the electric current Ie,y fowing in the Pt flm. Te right hand side of Eq. (1) refers to the SSE: ΔVe,y is the voltage drop across the Pt flm caused by the heat current Iq,x fowing across the device and T is the average temperature of the YIG. Te experiments are performed measuring the SPE and the SSE on the same YIG/Pt device. Te experimental value which represents, within the uncertainty, both the SPE and the SSE response of the specifc device is (6.2 ± 0.4) × 10−3 KA−1. Results Device geometry and measurement principle. Te geometry of the bulk YIG/Pt bilayer is shown in Fig. 1a. Te device is composed of a bulk YIG parallelepiped with a thin flm of Pt sputter deposited on one side. Te temperature gradient ∇xT and the heat current density jq,x are directed along the x axis. Te electric voltage ΔVe,y and the electric current density je,y are directed along the y axis. Te magnetic moment current density, jM, is along the x direction and transports magnetic moments directed along the z direction. Te magnetic feld H and the magnetization M of the bulk-YIG are also directed along the z axis (Fig. 1b,c). Te measurement setup for both SPE and SSE is shown in the sketches of Fig. 1c,e. Te YIG/Pt device is sandwiched between two thermal reservoirs (held at Th and Tc respectively) in order to form a closed thermal circuit. Te temperature of the two reservoirs can be externally controlled and the two heat currents between the device and each of the reservoirs are measured simultaneously by sensitive heat fux detectors. Te heat fux technique is chosen to avoid measure- ment uncertainties due to the hardly reproducible thermal contacts23–26. In order to minimize heat leakages in the thermal circuit, the whole setup is operated in vacuum. Technical, constructional and measurement details are reported in the Methods section. Spin Peltier efect. In the SPE, an electric current Ie,y fowing in the Pt layer generates a magnetic moment 27 current jM along the x direction as a result of the spin Hall efect . Te adjacent ferrimagnetic bulk YIG acts as a passive component and shows a longitudinal (x axis) heat current associated to the magnetic moment current injection28–30. Te measured heat current is however also including the Joule heat contribution generated by the electric current fowing in the Pt layer. In order to separate the Joule and spin Peltier contributions, their intrinsic diferences have to be exploited: the spin Peltier signal increases linearly with the Ie,y current and changes sign when the magnetization (along the z axis) or the Ie,y are inverted (odd parity), while Joule heating is proportional 2 13,18 to Ie,y and does not change sign under an inversion (even parity) . Te thermal problem of the SPE can be represented by the equivalent circuit of Fig. 2 (see also Supplementary material). SCIENTIFIC REPORTS | (2019) 9:2047 | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-38687-4 2 www.nature.com/scientificreports/ Figure 2. Equivalent thermal circuit of the SPE measurements of the YIG/Pt bilayer. Te YIG layer is represented by the SPE generator, ΔTSP , and by the thermal resistance YIG. Te Pt layer has a Joule heat current source, Iq,JH, and a thermal resistance Pt. Te circuit includes two thermal contact resistances cont,c and cont,h taking into account both the thermal resistance of the contacts and the presence of the heat fux sensors. Te diference Iq,h − Iq,c = Iq,JH provides the Joule heat. In isothermal conditions, with Th = Tc = T, we have Δ=TISP q,sq+−I ,JHh()c /2 where hP=+tY/2 IG + cont,h, cc=+ont,cPt/2, Iq,s = (Iq,h + Iq,c)/2 is the half sum and =+hc is the total resistance (see Supplementary material). In adiabatic conditions the SPE corresponds to the direct measurement of ΔTSP , the temperature difer- ence generated between the two faces of the bulk YIG sample. Previous experimental works have succeeded to 13,18 extract ΔTSP out of the Joule heat component by using an AC technique . Here, to test the reciprocal relation in a stationary state, we employ a DC technique in which we set isothermal conditions at the thermal baths, Th = Tc = T, and measure simultaneously the two heat currents: Iq,c and Iq,h.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Application Note AN-1057
    Application Note AN-1057 Heatsink Characteristics Table of Contents Page Introduction.........................................................................................................1 Maximization of Thermal Management .............................................................1 Heat Transfer Basics ..........................................................................................1 Terms and Definitions ........................................................................................2 Modes of Heat Transfer ......................................................................................2 Conduction..........................................................................................................2 Convection ..........................................................................................................5 Radiation .............................................................................................................9 Removing Heat from a Semiconductor...........................................................11 Selecting the Correct Heatsink........................................................................11 In many electronic applications, temperature becomes an important factor when designing a system. Switching and conduction losses can heat up the silicon of the device above its maximum Junction Temperature (Tjmax) and cause performance failure, breakdown and worst case, fire. Therefore the temperature of the device must be calculated not to exceed the Tjmax. To design a good
    [Show full text]
  • How Air Velocity Affects the Thermal Performance of Heat Sinks: a Comparison of Straight Fin, Pin Fin and Maxiflowtm Architectures
    How Air Velocity Affects The Thermal Performance of Heat Sinks: A Comparison of Straight Fin, Pin Fin and maxiFLOWTM Architectures Introduction A device’s temperature affects its op- erational performance and lifetime. To Air, Ta achieve a desired device temperature, Heat sink the heat dissipated by the device must be transferred along some path to the Rhs environment [1]. The most common method for transferring this heat is by finned metal devices, otherwise known Rsp as heat sinks. Base Resistance to heat transfer is called TIM thermal resistance. The thermal resis- RTIM tance of a heat sink decreases with . Component case, Tc Q Component more heat transfer area. However, be- cause device and equipment sizes are decreasing, heat sink sizes are also Figure 1. Exploded View of a Straight Fin Heat Sink with Corresponding Thermal Resis- tance Diagram. growing smaller. On the other hand, . device heat dissipation is increasing. heat sink selection criteria. Q RTIM, as shown in Equation 2. Therefore, designing a heat transfer The heat transfer rate of a heat sink, , . path in a limited space that minimizes depends on the difference between the Q = (Thot - Tcold)/Rt = (Tc - Ta)/Rt (1) thermal resistance is critical to the ef- component case temperature, Tc, and fective design of electronic equipment. the air temperature, Ta, along with the where total thermal resistance, Rt. This rela- This article discusses the effects of air tionship is shown in Equation 1. For Rt = RTIM + Rsp + Rhs (2) flow velocity on the experimentally de- a basic heat sink design, as shown in termined thermal resistance of different Figure 1, the total thermal resistance Therefore, to compare different heat heat sink designs.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide for the Use of the International System of Units (SI)
    Guide for the Use of the International System of Units (SI) m kg s cd SI mol K A NIST Special Publication 811 2008 Edition Ambler Thompson and Barry N. Taylor NIST Special Publication 811 2008 Edition Guide for the Use of the International System of Units (SI) Ambler Thompson Technology Services and Barry N. Taylor Physics Laboratory National Institute of Standards and Technology Gaithersburg, MD 20899 (Supersedes NIST Special Publication 811, 1995 Edition, April 1995) March 2008 U.S. Department of Commerce Carlos M. Gutierrez, Secretary National Institute of Standards and Technology James M. Turner, Acting Director National Institute of Standards and Technology Special Publication 811, 2008 Edition (Supersedes NIST Special Publication 811, April 1995 Edition) Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol. Spec. Publ. 811, 2008 Ed., 85 pages (March 2008; 2nd printing November 2008) CODEN: NSPUE3 Note on 2nd printing: This 2nd printing dated November 2008 of NIST SP811 corrects a number of minor typographical errors present in the 1st printing dated March 2008. Guide for the Use of the International System of Units (SI) Preface The International System of Units, universally abbreviated SI (from the French Le Système International d’Unités), is the modern metric system of measurement. Long the dominant measurement system used in science, the SI is becoming the dominant measurement system used in international commerce. The Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act of August 1988 [Public Law (PL) 100-418] changed the name of the National Bureau of Standards (NBS) to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and gave to NIST the added task of helping U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Is the Thermal Resistance Coefficient of High-Power Leds Constant? Lalith Jayasinghe, Tianming Dong, and Nadarajah Narendran
    Is the Thermal Resistance Coefficient of High-power LEDs Constant? Lalith Jayasinghe, Tianming Dong, and Nadarajah Narendran Lighting Research Center Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY 12180 www.lrc.rpi.edu Jayasinghe, L., T. Dong, and N. Narendran. 2007. Is the thermal resistance coefficient of high-power LEDs constant? Seventh International Conference on Solid State Lighting, Proceedings of SPIE 6669: 666911. Copyright 2007 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers. This paper was published in the Seventh International Conference on Solid State Lighting, Proceedings of SPIE and is made available as an electronic reprint with permission of SPIE. One print or electronic copy may be made for personal use only. Systematic or multiple reproduction, distribution to multiple locations via electronic or other means, duplication of any material in this paper for a fee or for commercial purposes, or modification of the content of the paper are prohibited. Is the Thermal Resistance Coefficient of High-power LEDs Constant? Lalith Jayasinghe*, Tianming Dong, and Nadarajah Narendran Lighting Research Center, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute 21 Union St., Troy, New York, 12180 USA ABSTRACT In this paper, we discuss the variations of thermal resistance coefficient from junction to board (RӨjb) for high-power light-emitting diodes (LEDs) as a result of changes in power dissipation and ambient temperature. Three-watt white and blue LED packages from the same manufacturer were tested for RӨjb at different input power levels and ambient temperatures. Experimental results show that RӨjb increases with increased input power for both LED packages, which can be attributed to current crowding mostly and some to the conductivity changes of GaN and TIM materials caused by heat rise.
    [Show full text]
  • Thermal-Electrical Analogy: Thermal Network
    Chapter 3 Thermal-electrical analogy: thermal network 3.1 Expressions for resistances Recall from circuit theory that resistance �"#"$ across an element is defined as the ratio of electric potential difference Δ� across that element, to electric current I traveling through that element, according to Ohm’s law, � � = "#"$ � (3.1) Within the context of heat transfer, the respective analogues of electric potential and current are temperature difference Δ� and heat rate q, respectively. Thus we can establish “thermal circuits” if we similarly establish thermal resistances R according to Δ� � = � (3.2) Medium: λ, cross-sectional area A Temperature T Temperature T Distance r Medium: λ, length L L Distance x (into the page) Figure 3.1: System geometries: planar wall (left), cylindrical wall (right) Planar wall conductive resistance: Referring to Figure 3.1 left, we see that thermal resistance may be obtained according to T1,3 − T1,5 � �, $-./ = = (3.3) �, �� The resistance increases with length L (it is harder for heat to flow), decreases with area A (there is more area for the heat to flow through) and decreases with conductivity �. Materials like styrofoam have high resistance to heat flow (they make good thermal insulators) while metals tend to have high low resistance to heat flow (they make poor insulators, but transmit heat well). Cylindrical wall conductive resistance: Referring to Figure 3.1 right, we have conductive resistance through a cylindrical wall according to T1,3 − T1,5 ln �5 �3 �9 $-./ = = (3.4) �9 2��� Convective resistance: The form of Newton’s law of cooling lends itself to a direct form of convective resistance, valid for either geometry.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1311.4868V1 [Cond-Mat.Mes-Hall] 19 Nov 2013
    Anisotropic magneto-thermal transport and Spin-Seebeck effect J.-E. Wegrowe∗ and H.-J. Drouhin Ecole Polytechnique, LSI, CNRS and CEA/DSM/IRAMIS, Palaiseau F-91128, France D. Lacour Institut Jean Lamour, UMR CNRS 7198, Universit´eH. Poincarr´e,F -5406 Vandoeuvre les Nancy, France (Dated: August 21, 2021) Abstract The angular dependence of the thermal transport in insulating or conducting ferromagnets is derived on the basis of the Onsager reciprocity relations applied to a magnetic system. It is shown that the angular dependence of the temperature gradient takes the same form as that of the anisotropic magnetoresistance, including anomalous and planar Hall contributions. The measured thermocouple generated between the extremities of the non-magnetic electrode in thermal contact to the ferromagnet follows this same angular dependence. The sign and amplitude of the magneto- voltaic signal is controlled by the difference of the Seebeck coefficients of the thermocouple. PACS numbers: 85.80.Lp, 85.75.-d, 72.20.Pa arXiv:1311.4868v1 [cond-mat.mes-hall] 19 Nov 2013 ∗Electronic address: [email protected] 1 Exploiting the properties of heat currents in magnetic systems for data processing and storage is a decisive challenge for the future of electronic devices and sensors. Recent research efforts, in line with spintronics developments, focus more specifically on the properties of the spin degrees of freedom associated to the electric charges and heat currents [1]. Important series of experiments - the so-called spin-pumping and spin-Seebeck measurements - have been performed in this context [2{12]: a magneto-voltaic signal is observed at zero electric current on electrodes that are in thermal contact with a ferromagnet.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Thermal Resistance Values
    Some Thermal Resistance Values Assuming constant thickness of given material Substance R (1 inch) R (1cm) (imperial units) (metric units) Air (non-convecting) 6 0.42 Copper 3.7x10-4 2.6x10-5 Plywood 1.25 8.6x10-2 Glass 0.18 1.3x10-2 Brick 0.11 7.7x10-3 Concrete 0.14 1.0x10-2 Fiberglass batts 3.6 0.25 Polyurethane foam 6.3 0.43 McFarland pg 16-8 To obtain actual R value, multiply by number of inches/cm of thickness Typical R values for various structures Structure R value R value ft2hr°F/Btu m2K/W 2x4 wall with 11 1.94 fiberglass insulation 2x4 wall with 22 3.87 polyurethane foam insulation Ceiling with 11 in. 38 6.87 fiberglass batts Ceiling with 14 in. 49 8.63 fiberglass batts ex Example (imperial units) A homeowner has a total ceiling area of (50 ft)x(20 ft) = 1000 ft2 Currently the attic is insulated with fiberglass insulation having an R value of 8 (“R8”) Question: If the winter temperature is 32°F and the house interior is at 72°F, how much heat is lost through the ceiling assuming no air leakage (just conduction) Q Q 1 1 Btu From ∆T = R we have = A∆T = (1000)(40) = 5000 At t R 8 hr Btu 1055J 1hr Convert 5000 = 1465W = 1.47kW to kW: hr 1Btu 3600s Question: If the homeowner increases to R38 insulation, by what fraction will the heat loss decrease? Heat loss is proportional to 1/R value, therefore the loss will decrease by a fraction (1/38)/(1/8)= 0.21 Role of Fiberglass insulation e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Lifetime Modelling Issues of Power Light Emitting Diodes
    energies Article Lifetime Modelling Issues of Power Light Emitting Diodes János Hegedüs, Gusztáv Hantos and András Poppe * Department of Electron Devices, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, 1117 Budapest, Hungary; [email protected] (J.H.); [email protected] (G.H.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +36-1-463-2721 Received: 27 May 2020; Accepted: 23 June 2020; Published: 1 July 2020 Abstract: The advantages of light emitting diodes (LEDs) over previous light sources and their continuous spread in lighting applications is now indisputable. Still, proper modelling of their lifespan offers additional design possibilities, enhanced reliability, and additional energy-saving opportunities. Accurate and rapid multi-physics system level simulations could be performed in Spice compatible environments, revealing the optical, electrical and even the thermal operating parameters, provided, that the compact thermal model of the prevailing luminaire and the appropriate elapsed lifetime dependent multi-domain models of the applied LEDs are available. The work described in this article takes steps in this direction in by extending an existing multi-domain LED model in order to simulate the major effect of the elapsed operating time of LEDs used. Our approach is based on the LM-80-08 testing method, supplemented by additional specific thermal measurements. A detailed description of the TM-21-11 type extrapolation method is provided in this paper along with an extensive overview of the possible aging models that could be used for practice-oriented LED lifetime estimations. Keywords: power LED measurement and simulation; life testing; reliability testing; LM-80; TM-21; LED lifetime modelling; LED multi-domain modelling; Spice-like modelling of LEDs; lifetime extrapolation and modelling of LEDs 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Thermal Resistance Measurements
    NiST PUBLICATIONS / W \ NIST SPECIAL PUBLICATION 400-86 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE /National Institute of Standards and Technology aoo-86 1990 C.2 NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS & TECHNOLOGY Researdi Infcmnatiofi Center Gakhersburg, MD 20899 DATE DUE Demco. Inc. 38-293 Semiconductor Measurement Technology: Thermal Resistance Measurements Frank F. Oettinger and David L. Blackburn Semiconductor Electronics Division Center for Electronics and Electrical Engineering National Engineering Laboratory National Institute of Standards and Technology Gaithersburg, MD 20899 July 1990 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, Robert A. Mosbacher, Secretary NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY, John W. Lyons, Director National Institute of Standards and Technology Special Publication 400-86 Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol. Spec. Publ. 400-86, 78 pages (July 1990) CODEN: NSPUE2 U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON: 1990 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402-9325 Semiconductor Measurement Technology: THERMAL RESISTANCE MEASUREMENTS Table of Contents Page I. POWER TRANSISTORS 1 Introduction 1 The Concept of Thermal Resistance 2 The Effect of Nonuniform Junction Temperature on the Definition of Rqjr ... 2 The Variation of Rqjr with Device Operating Conditions (/c?^CJs) 3 General Methods for Measuring Device Temperature 7 Control of the Thermal Environment 13 Selection of Temperature-Sensitive Electrical Parameters 14 Measurement of Temperature- Sensitive Electrical Parameters 17 Safe-Operating- Area Limits 21 DC Thermal Limit 21 Second Breakdown Limit 26 Relating the Chip Temperature to the Measured Temperature 29 Determination of Area of Power Generation and Peak Junction Temperature . 29 Detection of Onset of Current Constrictions 33 Reasons for Measuring Temperature 33 Measurement of Integrated Power Devices 38 Power Transistor Thermal Standardization Activities 41 II.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Calculate “R” Values
    TECHNICAL INFORMATION Bulletin #01 February 2018 How to calculate “R” Values “R” value is used to designate the parallel surfaces and means the Where r1 = uninsulated pipe radius thermal resistance of an object. R-value increases proportionally to in inches 01 The higher the R-value, the higher the thickness. r2 = insulated pipe radius in inches thermal resistance and thus, Cylindrical Objects insulating value. k = thermal conductivity The simple equation for R-value Flat Objects r does does not hold true for r ln 2 2 ( r ( R-values for flat objects such as cylindrical objects like pipe R= 1 for sheet insulation are easy to insulation. For these objects, k calculate. It is simply the thickness the heat flow is not the simple of the insulation in inches divided straight-through heat flow found Based on this equation, the by the thermal conductivity of the with flat objects. Instead, the heat R-value gets larger as the insulation. For example, a two flow is radial because the inner insulation thickness increases but inch thick sheet of insulation with surface area is much smaller than also as the pipe sizes gets smaller. a thermal conductivity of 0.25 outer surface area and the R-value For example, 1" thick insulation Btu•in/h•ft2•°F has an R-value calculation must take this into will have a higher R-value on a 1" equal to 2 divided by 0.25 or 8.0. account. As a result, the equation pipe than it will on a 3" pipe. As a for the R-value of cylindrical result, one must always consider This simple equation is true for any objects is as follows: the pipe size and insulation flat, homogeneous material with thickness to determine the R-value of insulation on a pipe.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bridge Between the Device and System of Thermoelectric Power
    Electronic Supplementary Material (ESI) for Energy & Environmental Science. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2020 1 Supporting Information for 2 System efficiency and power: the bridge between the device and 3 system of thermoelectric power generator 4 Kang Zhu1,2, Biao Deng1,2, Pengxiang Zhang1,2, Hee Seok Kim3, 5 Peng Jiang4 and Weishu Liu1,2* 6 1 Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, 7 Guangdong 518055, China 8 2 Shenzhen Engineering Research Center for Novel Electronic Information Materials and Devices, Southern 9 University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518055, China 10 3 Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of South Alabama, Mobile, Alabama 36688, USA 11 4 State Key Laboratory of Catalysis, CAS Center for Excellence in Nanoscience, Dalian Institute of Chemical 12 Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Dalian, Liaoning 116023, China 13 *Email: [email protected] 14 15 1. Derivation of the Governing Equation of a Thermoelectric Process 16 The earlier works by Callen1 and Domenicali2 are reviewed, to present a complete derivation 17 of the differential equation which governs the temperature distribution in a thermoelectric leg in 18 steady state. The particle current density, the energy current density and the entropy current 19 density within a TE leg are respectively denoted as 퐽⃗, 푊⃗ and 푆⃗. The heat current density is by 20 definition written as 푞⃗ = 푇푆⃗. In a steady-state process the following conditions should be met, 21 ∇ ∙ 푊⃗ = 0#(푆1) 22 ∇ ∙ 퐽⃗ = 0#(푆2) 23 ∇ ∙ 푆⃗ = 푆̇ #(푆3) 24 where 푆̇ is the entropy production rate per unit volume.
    [Show full text]
  • Recommended Practice for the Use of Metric (SI) Units in Building Design and Construction NATIONAL BUREAU of STANDARDS
    <*** 0F ^ ££v "ri vt NBS TECHNICAL NOTE 938 / ^tTAU Of U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE/ 1 National Bureau of Standards ^^MMHHMIB JJ Recommended Practice for the Use of Metric (SI) Units in Building Design and Construction NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS 1 The National Bureau of Standards was established by an act of Congress March 3, 1901. The Bureau's overall goal is to strengthen and advance the Nation's science and technology and facilitate their effective application for public benefit. To this end, the Bureau conducts research and provides: (1) a basis for the Nation's physical measurement system, (2) scientific and technological services for industry and government, (3) a technical basis for equity in trade, and (4) technical services to pro- mote public safety. The Bureau consists of the Institute for Basic Standards, the Institute for Materials Research, the Institute for Applied Technology, the Institute for Computer Sciences and Technology, the Office for Information Programs, and the Office of Experimental Technology Incentives Program. THE ENSTITUTE FOR BASIC STANDARDS provides the central basis within the United States of a complete and consist- ent system of physical measurement; coordinates that system with measurement systems of other nations; and furnishes essen- tial services leading to accurate and uniform physical measurements throughout the Nation's scientific community, industry, and commerce. The Institute consists of the Office of Measurement Services, and the following center and divisions: Applied Mathematics — Electricity
    [Show full text]