The Tocsin | Issue 4, 2018
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Hon Richard Marles Shadow Minister for Defence Member for Corio
THE HON RICHARD MARLES SHADOW MINISTER FOR DEFENCE MEMBER FOR CORIO E&OE TRANSCRIPT TV INTERVIEW TODAY SHOW FRIDAY, 23 SEPTEMBER 2016 KARL STEFANOVIC: Joining us now is Christopher Pyne and Shadow Defence Minister Richard Marles good morning chaps nice to see you all. CHRISTOPER PYNE: Good morning Karl and welcome Richard. RICHARD MARLES, SHADOW MINISTER FOR DEFENCE: Good morning Karl, good morning Christopher STEFANOVIC: Well Christopher first up are you planning to ban Muslim immigration like sixty percent of Liberal voters want you to do? PYNE: No we are certainly not going to do that, we believe in a non-discriminatory immigration policy. What that poll reflects I think is that people are worried about their safety when they see the television or read the newspapers and hear Islamic State or Al-Qaeda or any of these other terrorist organisations making dire threats against the West and against Australia, obviously is makes them nervous and I perfectly understand that and they have been nervous for some time not just since the arrival of One Nation back in the national parliament and that’s why the Government and the Opposition have to keep reassuring people about the strength of our borders and national security, putting in place the measures to protect us as much as we possibly can, which we have been doing for the last three and a bit years. STEFANOVIC: Okay Richard, 40 percent, a surprising figure I reckon. 40 percent of Labor voters in that survey want the same ban. MARLES: Look I think it’s a really concerning survey, but what it says to me is that we have to have leadership in this country and Christopher talks about reassurance, there is no reassurance when you’ve got an Immigration Minister who talks about illiterate, innumerate refugees coming to this country stealing our jobs and being on the doll, now he said that during the election campaign and if you want to give people a sense of confidence about our multicultural society we’ve got to see leadership from our government. -
Griffith REVIEW Editon 36: What Is Australia For?
36 A QUARTERLY OF NEW WRITING & IDEAS ESSAYS & MEMOIR, FICTION & REPORTAGE Frank Moorhouse, Kim Mahood, Jim Davidson, Robyn Archer Dennis Altman, Michael Wesley, Nick Bryant, Leah Kaminsky, Romy Ash, David Astle, Some Provocations Peter Mares, Cameron Muir, Bruce Pascoe GriffithREVIEW36 SOME PROVOCATIONS eISBN 978-0-9873135-0-8 Publisher Marilyn McMeniman AM Editor Julianne Schultz AM Deputy Editor Nicholas Bray Production Manager Paul Thwaites Proofreader Alan Vaarwerk Editorial Interns Alecia Wood, Michelle Chitts, Coco McGrath Administration Andrea Huynh GRIFFITH REVIEW South Bank Campus, Griffith University PO Box 3370, South Brisbane QLD 4101 Australia Ph +617 3735 3071 Fax +617 3735 3272 [email protected] www.griffithreview.com TEXT PUBLISHING Swann House, 22 William St, Melbourne VIC 3000 Australia Ph +613 8610 4500 Fax +613 9629 8621 [email protected] www.textpublishing.com.au SUBSCRIPTIONS Within Australia: 1 year (4 editions) $111.80 RRP, inc. P&H and GST Outside Australia: 1 year (4 editions) A$161.80 RRP, inc. P&H Institutional and bulk rates available on application. COPYRIGHT The copyright of all material published in Griffith REVIEW and on its website remains the property of the author, artist or photographer, and is subject to copyright laws. No part of this publication may be reproduced without written permission from the publisher. ||| Opinions published in Griffith REVIEW are not necessarily those of the Publisher, Editor, Griffith University or Text Publishing. FEEDBACK AND COMMENT www.griffithreview.com ADVERTISING Each issue of Griffith REVIEW has a circulation of at least 4,000 copies. Full-page adverts are available to selected advertisers. -
Political Finance in Australia
Political finance in Australia: A skewed and secret system Prepared by Sally Young and Joo-Cheong Tham for the Democratic Audit of Australia School of Social Sciences The Australian National University Report No.7 Table of contents An immigrant society PAGE ii The opinions expressed in this paper are those of the authors and should not be The Democratic Audit of Australia vii PAGE iii taken to represent the views of either the Democratic Audit of Australia or The Tables iv Australian National University Figures v Abbreviations v © The Australian National University 2006 Executive Summary ix National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication data 1 Money, politics and the law: Young, Sally. Questions for Australian democracy Political Joo-Cheong Tham 1 Bibliography 2 Private funding of political parties Political finance in Australia: a skewed and secret system. Joo-Cheong Tham 8 ISBN 0 9775571 0 3 (pbk). 3 Public funding of political parties Sally Young 36 ISBN 0 9775571 1 1 (online). 4 Government and the advantages of office 1. Campaign funds - Australia. I. Tham, Joo-Cheong. II. Sally Young 61 Australian National University. Democratic Audit of 5 Party expenditure Australia. III. Title. (Series: Democratic Audit of Sally Young 90 Australia focussed audit; 7). 6 Questions for reform Joo-Cheong Tham and Sally Young 112 324.780994 7 Conclusion: A skewed and secret system 140 An online version of this paper can be found by going to the Democratic Audit of Australia website at: http://democratic.audit.anu.edu.au References and further -
What Will a Labor Government Mean for Defence Industry in Australia?
What will a Labor Government mean for Defence Industry in Australia? Hon Greg Combet AM Opinion polls suggest a change of government in the Australian Federal election in (expected) May 2019. An incoming Labor Government led by Bill Shorten will likely feature Richard Marles as Minister for Defence and Mike Kelly as Assisting Minister for Defence Industry and Support. Jason Clare, a former Minister for Defence Matériel, would likely have influence upon the defence industry portfolio in his potential role as Minister for Trade and Investment. Under a Labor Government, it is possible Shorten would appoint a new Minister for Defence Matériel (as has been an established practice for many years) given the magnitude of expenditure and complexity of the portfolio. Shorten and Marles have been associates since university and have been closely aligned during their trade union and political careers. With extensive practical experience of the Australian industry, Shorten and Marles have a record of working constructively with business leadership. Both have a sound understanding of the role and the significance of defence industry in Australia. Marles, in particular, has a greater interest in national security and strategic issues and would likely concentrate on these in the portfolio and delegate aspects of defence industry to a ministerial colleague. Labor’s defence industry policy was reviewed and adopted during the December 2018 Party National Conference. The policy is consistent with Labor’s approach when it was last in government, reiterating support for: • an Australian defence industry that provides the Australian Defence Force with the necessary capabilities; • sovereign industrial capability where required, specifically identifying naval shipbuilding; • an export focus; • the maximisation of the participation of small-to-medium enterprises (SMEs) in defence projects; and • initiatives to develop workforce skills. -
The Origins of the Australian System of Superannuation
PLEASE TYPE THE UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES Thesis/Dissertation Sheet Surname or Family name: Easson First name: Mary Other namejs: Louise Abbreviation for degree as given in the University calendar: M.Phil School: Australian School of Business Centre for Pensions and Superannuation Title: Present at the Creation: The Origins of the Australian System of Superannuation Abstract 350 words maximum: (PLEASE TYPE} The thesis explores the origins and development of the Australian system of superannuation, from 1983 to the mid-1990s, during the terms of the Hawke and Keating Labor Governments, and the Accords between those governments and the Australian Council of Trade Unions (ACTU), on behalf of the Australian union movement. Prior to 1983, access to superannuation was largely confined to male managerial and professional employees and was further limited in terms of eligibility, vesting and portability. In the 1970s unions began to exploit limited power in particular enterprises and industries to pursue superannuation as deferred income. The three tier Australian system evolves from this start: (i) mandatory contributions under legislation; (ii) employee supplements to retirement savings; and, (iii) a social security safety net, the universal age pension entitlement. Relentlessly pursued by the unions, generalled by ACTU Secretary Bill Kelty, from Accord Mark J in 1983, and its subsequent iterations, superannuation became an industrial right. lt may never have occurred but for the leadership of Prime Minister Bob Hawke and particularly his Treasurer, later Prime Minister, Paul Keating. The circumstances of the origin of Australia's system of compulsory superannuation were unique. A question explored and answered in the thesis is whether its origins and development were deliberate or largely accidental. -
Protecting the Future: Federal Leadership for Australia's
PROTECTING THE FUTURE Federal Leadership for Australia’s Environment This research paper is a project of the Chifley Research Centre, the official think tank of the Australian Labor Party. This paper has been prepared in conjunction with the Labor Environment Action Network (LEAN). The report is not a policy document of the Federal Parliamentary Labor Party. Publication details: Wade, Felicity. Gale, Brett. “Protecting the Future: Federal Leadership for Australia’s Environment” Chifley Research Centre, November 2018. PROTECTING THE FUTURE Federal Leadership for Australia’s Environment FOREWORD Australians are immensely proud of our natural environment. From our golden beaches to our verdant rainforests, Australia seems to be a nation blessed with an abundance of nature’s riches. Our natural environment has played a starring role in Australian movies and books and it is one of our key selling points in attracting tourists down under. We pride ourselves on our clean, green country and its contrast to many other places around the world. Why is it then that in recent decades pride in our The mission of the Chifley Research Centre (CRC) is to natural environment has very rarely translated into champion a Labor culture of ideas. The CRC’s policy action to protect it? work aims to set the groundwork for a fairer and more progressive Australia. Establishing a long-term agenda We have one of the highest rates of fauna extinctions for solving societal problems for progressive ends in the world, globally significant rates of deforestation, is a key aspect of the work undertaken by the CRC. plastics clogging our waterways, and in many regions, The research undertaken by the CRC is designed to diminishing air, water and soil quality threaten human stimulate public policy debate on issues outside of day wellbeing and productivity. -
Federal Labor Shadow Ministry January 2021
Federal Labor Shadow Ministry January 2021 Portfolio Minister Leader of the Opposition The Hon Anthony Albanese MP Shadow Cabinet Secretary Senator Jenny McAllister Deputy Leader of the Opposition The Hon Richard Marles MP Shadow Minister for National Reconstruction, Employment, Skills and Small Business Shadow Minister for Science Shadow Minister Assisting for Small Business Matt Keogh MP Shadow Assistant Minister for Employment and Skills Senator Louise Pratt Leader of the Opposition in the Senate Senator the Hon Penny Wong Shadow Minister for Foreign Affairs Shadow Minister for International Development and the Pacific Pat Conroy MP Shadow Assistant Minister to the Leader of the Opposition in the Senate Senator Jenny McAllister Leader of the Opposition in the Senate Senator the Hon Kristina Keneally Shadow Minister for Home Affairs Shadow Minister for Immigration and Citizenship Shadow Minister for Government Accountability Shadow Minister for Multicultural Affairs Andrew Giles MP Shadow Minister Assisting for Immigration and Citizenship Shadow Minister for Disaster and Emergency Management Senator Murray Watt Shadow Minister Assisting on Government Accountability Pat Conroy MP Shadow Minister for Industrial Relations The Hon Tony Burke MP Shadow Minister for the Arts Manager of Opposition Business in the House of Representatives Shadow Special Minister of State Senator the Hon Don Farrell Shadow Minister for Sport and Tourism Shadow Minister Assisting the Leader of the Opposition Shadow Treasurer Dr Jim Chalmers MP Shadow Assistant -
Apo.0001.0005.0058
APO.0001.0005.0058 RICHARD MARLES MP DEPUTY LEADER OF THE AUSTRALIAN LABOR PARTY SHADOW MINISTER FOR DEFENCE MEMBER FOR CORIO E&OE TRANSCRIPT TELEVISION INTERVIEW SKY NEWS AM AGENDA THURSDAY, 10 SEPTEMBER 2020 SUBJECTS: Appalling situation with the intervention on Auspost Executive; Victoria. TOM CONNELL, HOST: Deputy Labor leader, Richard Marles, thanks for your time. We'll get to the Melbourne situation in a moment what did you make of this story first of all? RICHARD MARLES, DEPUTY LEADER OF THE AUSTRALIAN LABOR PARTY: I think this is astounding. And the double standard that we've got here is absolutely palpable. I mean you've got a Government which is working with Christine Holgate and Pauline Hanson to put in place regulations which exist now which effectively doubled the delivery time in capital cities. You've got Australia Post saying to people that they can't expect their mail to be delivered on time on Father's Day. But if you are Pauline Hanson, you can contact the CEO of Australia Post and make sure that your stubby holders get delivered to the council towers in Victoria. That is an appalling situation. And it says everything about how this Government goes about its business but how there is a complete double standard out there. Pauline Hanson can get delivery straight away, via personally the CEO, everything else has to wait for their mail. CONNELL: Well is there any evidence Pauline Hanson was the one? Wasn't it Australia Post that were told the deliveries wouldn't happen and then insisted this is a basic right, that you can't edit someone's mail for want of a better word? MARLES: Of course, and it is a basic right. -
Gillard Ministry Reshuffle March 2013 on 25 March 2013, Prime Minister
Gillard Ministry Reshuffle March 2013 On 25 March 2013, Prime Minister Julia Gillard announced the details of a new Cabinet and Ministry. The reshuffle comes following the resignations of Ministers Chris Bowen, Kim Carr, Simon Crean and Martin Ferguson and Parliamentary Secretary Richard Marles. The Prime Minister’s press release is available here. The Hon Gary Gray AO MP takes over as Minister for Resources and Energy, Minister for Tourism and Small Business. The Hon Jason Clare MP is promoted to cabinet retaining his previous responsibilities. Attorney-General the Hon Mark Dreyfus QC MP will take on the roles of Special Minister of State and Minister for the Public Service and Integrity. Minister for Infrastructure and Transport the Hon Anthony Albanese MP takes over the portfolios of Regional Development and Local Government, supported by the Hon Catherine King MP who takes over as Minister for Regional Services, Local Communities and Territories as well as Minister for Road Safety. The Hon Dr Craig Emerson MP adds Tertiary Education, Skills, Science and Research to his portfolio whilst retaining his current roles as Minister for Trade and Competiveness and Minister Assisting the Prime Minister on Asian Century policy. Senator the Hon Don Farrell takes on the role as Minister for Science and Research as well as the role as Minister Assisting on Tourism, and the Hon Sharon Bird MP takes on the role as Minister for Higher Education and Skills. The Hon Tony Burke MP adds Arts to his portfolio and will be assisted by Mr Michael Danby MP who takes on the role as Parliamentary Secretary for the Arts. -
Legislative Assembly
17443 LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Wednesday 17 October 2001 ______ Mr Speaker (The Hon. John Henry Murray) took the chair at 10.00 a.m. Mr Speaker offered the Prayer. BILLS RETURNED The following bills were returned from the Legislative Council without amendment: Police Powers (Vehicles) Amendment Bill Summary Offences Amendment (Minors in Sex Clubs) and Theatres and Public Halls Repeal Bill ELECTORAL DISTRICT OF TAMWORTH Resignation of Antony Harold Curties Windsor Mr SPEAKER: I report the receipt of a letter dated 16 October 2001 from Antony Harold Curties Windsor resigning his seat as member for the electoral district of Tamworth. Vacant Seat Motion by Mr Whelan agreed to: That, in accordance with section 70 of the Parliamentary Electorates and Elections Act 1912, the seat of the member for Tamworth be declared vacant, by reason of the resignation of Antony Harold Curties Windsor. PRIVATE MEMBERS' STATEMENTS _________ Mr FACE: I seek the leave of the House to permit up to 10 members to make private members' statements forthwith. Leave granted. LINCS VOLUNTEER SCHEME INC. Mr ROZZOLI (Hawkesbury) [10.02 a.m.]: I draw to the attention of the House the outstanding success of a volunteer organisation in my electorate. I am proud to announce that the Living in Communities [LINCS] Volunteer Scheme Inc. was successfully named the national winner of the National Health and Medical Research Council award for volunteer services in medically related areas. It won the national award in the community service regional organisation category, following its outstanding success as the New South Wales winner. This is an outstanding achievement for this organisation, which has struggled financially to carry out its work. -
French Vs. Australian Nuclear Policies: Convergences, Divergences and Avenues for Cooperation
French vs. Australian nuclear policies: convergences, divergences and avenues for cooperation Recherches & Documents N°19/2020 Eloise N. Watson December 2020 www.frstrategie.org French vs. Australian nuclear policies: convergences, divergences and avenues for cooperation SUMMARY FRENCH VS. AUSTRALIAN NUCLEAR POLICIES: CONVERGENCES, DIVERGENCES AND AVENUES FOR COOPERATION .......................................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................... 1 1. STANCE ON NUCLEAR DETERRENCE .......................................................................................... 2 1.1. The Australian position ........................................................................................2 1.1.1. Nuclear weapons acquisition: a fleeting flirtation ................................................2 1.1.2. Nuclear option shelved; ‘extended nuclear deterrence’ prioritised ......................3 1.1.3. Continued reinforcement of extended nuclear deterrence in the post-Cold War era .....................................................................................................................4 1.2. The French position .............................................................................................4 1.2.1. The original strategic rationale: guarantee security, diplomatic standing and independence ....................................................................................................4 -
PUBLISHED VERSION Carol Johnson "Incorporating Gender Equality : Tensions and Synergies in the Relationship Between Feminism and Australian Social Democracy"
PUBLISHED VERSION Carol Johnson "Incorporating gender equality : tensions and synergies in the relationship between feminism and Australian social democracy" Copyright the Author PERMISSIONS Copyright the Author 23 September, 2016 http://hdl.handle.net/2440/101240 “Incorporating gender equality: Tensions and synergies in the relationship between feminism and Australian social democracy.” Carol Johnson Politics and International Studies Department, University of Adelaide “Incorporating gender equality: Tensions and synergies in the relationship between feminism 36 and Australian social democracy.” This essay focuses on exploring the tensions and synergies in the relationship between feminism and social democracy via an analysis of Australian Labor governments. The Australian Labor Party (ALP) is Australia’s longstanding social democratic party and one of the first in the world to achieve government.1 Yet, it is important to recognise that without the influence of feminism, social democracy in Australia (as elsewhere) would have been a much diminished movement that risked representing only half of the population, not only in terms of policy but also in terms of gender representation. As late as 1973, Gough Whitlam (1973: 1152) acknowledged that the ALP was “a male dominated Party, in a male dominated Parliament in a male dominated society”. Indeed, there were no female Labor members of parliament at that time (Whitlam 1973: 1152).2 Twenty years later, there were still only nine female Labor members of the House of Representatives and four