Four Decades of Christmas Bird Counts in the Great Plains: Ornithological Evidence of a Changing Climate

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Four Decades of Christmas Bird Counts in the Great Plains: Ornithological Evidence of a Changing Climate University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Papers in Ornithology Papers in the Biological Sciences 2-2-2009 Four Decades of Christmas Bird Counts in the Great Plains: Ornithological Evidence of a Changing Climate Paul A. Johnsgard University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Thomas G. Shane Garden City, KS., [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/biosciornithology Part of the Ornithology Commons Johnsgard, Paul A. and Shane, Thomas G., "Four Decades of Christmas Bird Counts in the Great Plains: Ornithological Evidence of a Changing Climate" (2009). Papers in Ornithology. 46. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/biosciornithology/46 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Papers in the Biological Sciences at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Papers in Ornithology by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Four Decades of Christmas Bird Counts in the Great Plains: Ornithological Evidence of a Changing Climate Paul A. Johnsgard Foundation Professor Emeritus of Biological Sciences, School of Biological Sciences University of Nebraska–Lincoln, NE. Winter Range Maps by Thomas G. Shane Garden City, KS. University of Nebraska–Lincoln Libraries Lincoln, Nebraska 2009 Copyright © 2009 Paul A. Johnsgard & Thomas G. Shane Contents Page Foreword and Acknowledgments 1 Part 1. Introduction 3 Methods of Study 3 Topography, Landforms and Climate of the Great Plains 6 Natural Vegetation and Avifauna of the Great Plains 10 Climate Change and its Effects on Great Plains Birds 17 Part 2: The Winter Birds of the Great Plains 21 Family Anatidae: Swans, Geese and Ducks 21 Family Phasianidae: Pheasants, Grouse and Turkeys 47 Family Odontophoridae: New World Quails 53 Family Gaviidae: Loons 54 Family Podicipedidae: Grebes 56 Family Pelecanidae: Pelicans 58 Family Phalacrocoracidae: Cormorants 59 Family Ardeidae: Herons and Bitterns 60 Family Cathartidae: American Vultures 61 Family Accipitridae: Kites, Hawks and Eagles 62 Family Falconidae: Falcons 72 Family Rallidae: Rails, Gallinules and Coots 77 Family Gruidae: Cranes 79 Family Charadriidae: Plovers 80 Family Scolopacidae: Sandpipers, Snipes and Phalaropes 81 Family Laridae: Gulls and Terns 84 Family Columbidae: Pigeons and Doves 91 Family Cuculidae: Cuckoos and Roadrunners 95 Family Tytonidae: Barn Owls 96 Family Strigidae: Typical Owls 97 Family Alcedinidae: Kingfishers 104 Family Picidae: Woodpeckers 105 Family Tyrannidae: Tyrant Flycatchers 115 Family Laniidae: Shrikes 117 Family Corvidae: Jays, Magpies and Crows 118 ii Family Alaudidae: Larks 125 Family Paridae: Titmice 126 Family Sittidae: Nuthatches 131 Family Certhiidae: Creepers 134 Family Troglodytidae: Wrens 135 Family Cinclidae: Dippers 141 Family Regulidae: Kinglets 142 Family Turdidae: Thrushes and Solitaires 144 Family Mimidae: Mockingbirds, Thrashers and Catbirds 149 Family Sturnidae: Starlings 153 Family Motacillidae: Pipits 153 Family Bombycillidae: Waxwings 155 Family Parulidae: Wood Warblers 157 Family Emberizidae: Towhees, Sparrows and Longspurs 160 Family Cardinalidae: Cardinals and Grosbeaks 181 Family Icteridae: Blackbirds, Orioles and Meadowlarks 182 Family Fringillidae: Boreal Finches 190 Family Passeridae: Old World Sparrows 200 Literature Cited 201 Species Abundance Tables 221 Winter Range Maps 334 iii Foreword and Acknowledgments Foreword The rationale for this book has its origins in Terry Root’s 1988 Atlas of North American Win- tering Birds, which provided a baseline landmark for evaluating the nationwide winter distribu- tions of North American birds, using data from the National Audubon Society’s annual Christ- mas Bird Counts birds from 1962-63 through 1971-72. Tom Shane and I speculated that an up- dated analysis might shed light on the possible effects of more recent climatic warming trends on bird migration and wintering patterns in the Great Plains, a region known for its severe winters and also one of our continent’s important migratory pathways and wintering regions. As life-long residents of the Great Plains, we have both lived long enough to have witnessed some of these changes in avian migrations and wintering patterns personally. Johnsgard tested these specula- tions by doing some sample species analyses during the spring of 2008, after which it appeared that a complete survey of Great Plains winter birds would be worthwhile, based on Christmas Bird Count data.. Following Root’s precedent, it is appropriate to dedicate this study to the countless thousands of people who have participated in Christmas Bird Counts over the years. This is especially true in the northern Great Plains, where the weather in late December can be unbearable. The first Christmas Count one of us (PAJ) participated in was centered at Fargo, ND, in late December of 1952. The temperature was a scant seven degrees above zero, with a mercifully unknown but memorable wind-chill, and only 17 species to be seen after an entire day of effort. Upon reflec- tion, it seemed a good reason for applying to graduate schools having warmer climates. Since then, winters in North Dakota have thankfully become somewhat warmer, and the number of people participating in Christmas Bird Counts has increased greatly. Considering only the 40 winters chosen for the present analysis, from 1967-68 to 2006-07, and the multi-state re- gion extending from North Dakota through Oklahoma plus the Texas panhandle, there have been nearly 3,000 Christmas Bird Counts and more than 40,000 participants (many of whom represent repeat paricipations in different years). In a real sense, all of these people have directly contri- buted to this book. The idea of doing a book on winter birds of the Great Plains was Shane’s. Johnsgard agreed to participate and suggested patterning the book after his earlier (1979) summary on the breeding birds of the Great Plains states. He also agreed to analyze several decades of Christmas Bird Count data, to document regional winter bird populations, and to estimate possible population trends over the past half-century. Students at the University of Nebraska’s Biological Field Sta- tion in western Nebraska were assigned the initialextraction of data on more than 200 species for this phase. Shane agreed to produce winter range maps for all the nearly 200 species well- documented by Christmas Count data. It should be pointed out that the Christmas Bird Counts, which are always performed within two weeks before or after Christmas, do not truly inventory the birds of the coldest part of a Great Plains winter, which typically occurs around the middle of January. They do, however, provide by far the largest and most long-running database available for trying to judge winter bird populations and associated population trends in North America. A nationwide analysis of Christmas Count data relative to climate change is now currently underway by the National Au- dubon Society that will cover the same forty-year period as our study, and will also incorporate data from four decades of Breeding Bird Surveys.(Weidensaul, 2007), 1 Likewise, attempting to summarize published migration data has its problems, for most such arrival and departure information is relatively old, and does not reflect recent climatic trends. For example, the migration data given for Nebraska are primarily based on an analysis of published arrival and departure dates published between 1933 and the late 1970’s (Johnsgard, 1980). Al- though these dates more closely reflect climatic conditions of the mid-1900’s than those of the present, such data provide a comparative basis for evaluating future migration information, and are the only extensive series of dates available for the Great Plains region. Records from recent years suggest that average spring arrivals now average about two weeks earlier in Nebraska, and average autumn departures are now at least 34 weeks later. These deviations from long-term av- erages appear to be more extreme to the north of Nebraska, and less divergent southwardly, in parallel with more rapid winter amelioration in higher latitudes during recent decades. Acknowledgments For helping in the tedious job of extracting and summarizing Christmas Bird Count data, Johnsgard wishes to thank numerous University of Nebraska undergraduate students studying at Cedar Point Biological Station.. They include Laura Achterberg, Eva Anguilano, Matthew Colling, Andrew Furman, Lisa Levander, Michael McGuire, Sean O’Day, Elizabeth Olson, Gwendolyn Powell, Keenan Price, Nikaela Schernikau, Tyler Seiboldt, John Sens, Justin Til- berg, Mohammed Vhora, Charles Wessel and Kristin Williams. The use of University of Ne- braska computer, library, and other University facilites at Cedar Point, as will as at Lincoln, is greatly appreciated. Additional people who provided advice or helped Johnsgard in various ways included Linda R. Brown, Mindy Goldberg, Josef Kren, Ronald Martin, Mark Orsag and Sebastian Patti. Dr. Paul Royster very kindly agreed to placing the manuscript in the University of Nebraska–Lincoln Library’s digital collections of Papers in Ornithology (archived online in the UNL institutional repository at http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/biosciornithology/). Thomas Shane would like to thank Trent Smith and Janice Urie for their support through the Comprehensive Learning Center, and to Amy Heinemann and Steve Thompson at the Teaching and Learning Center both housed at
Recommended publications
  • Differentially Expressed Genes Match Bill Morphology and Plumage Despite Largely Undifferentiated Genomes in a Holarctic Songbird
    Molecular Ecology (2015) doi: 10.1111/mec.13140 Differentially expressed genes match bill morphology and plumage despite largely undifferentiated genomes in a Holarctic songbird NICHOLAS A. MASON*† and SCOTT A. TAYLOR*† *Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Cornell University, 215 Tower Rd., Ithaca, NY 14853, USA, †Fuller Evolutionary Biology Program, Laboratory of Ornithology, Cornell University, 159 Sapsucker Woods Road, Ithaca, NY 14850, USA Abstract Understanding the patterns and processes that contribute to phenotypic diversity and speciation is a central goal of evolutionary biology. Recently, high-throughput sequencing has provided unprecedented phylogenetic resolution in many lineages that have experienced rapid diversification. The Holarctic redpoll finches (Genus: Acanthis) provide an intriguing example of a recent, phenotypically diverse lineage; traditional sequencing and genotyping methods have failed to detect any genetic differences between currently recognized species, despite marked variation in plumage and mor- phology within the genus. We examined variation among 20 712 anonymous single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) distributed throughout the redpoll genome in com- bination with 215 825 SNPs within the redpoll transcriptome, gene expression data and ecological niche modelling to evaluate genetic and ecological differentiation among currently recognized species. Expanding upon previous findings, we present evidence of (i) largely undifferentiated genomes among currently recognized species; (ii) substantial niche
    [Show full text]
  • 070403/EU XXVII. GP Eingelangt Am 28/07/21
    070403/EU XXVII. GP Eingelangt am 28/07/21 Council of the European Union Brussels, 28 July 2021 (OR. en) 11099/21 ADD 1 ENV 557 WTO 188 COVER NOTE From: European Commission date of receipt: 27 July 2021 To: General Secretariat of the Council No. Cion doc.: D074372/02 - Annex 1 Subject: ANNEX to the COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) …/… amending Council Regulation (EC) No 338/97 on the protection of species of wild fauna and flora by regulating trade therein Delegations will find attached document D074372/02 - Annex 1. Encl.: D074372/02 - Annex 1 11099/21 ADD 1 CSM/am TREE.1.A EN www.parlament.gv.at EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, XXX D074372/02 […](2021) XXX draft ANNEX 1 ANNEX to the COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) …/… amending Council Regulation (EC) No 338/97 on the protection of species of wild fauna and flora by regulating trade therein EN EN www.parlament.gv.at ‘ANNEX […] Notes on interpretation of Annexes A, B, C and D 1. Species included in Annexes A, B, C and D are referred to: (a) by the name of the species; or (b) as being all of the species included in a higher taxon or designated part thereof. 2. The abbreviation ‘spp.’ is used to denote all species of a higher taxon. 3. Other references to taxa higher than species are for the purposes of information or classification only. 4. Species printed in bold in Annex A are listed there in consistency with their protection as provided for by Directive 2009/147/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council1 or Council Directive 92/43/EEC2.
    [Show full text]
  • Vocalizations of Common, Lesser and Arctic Redpoll S
    Vocalizations of Common, Lesser and Arctic Redpoll s Marc Herremans T he taxonomy of redpolis has long been a subject of much discussion, and the specific status of Redpoll Carduelis flammea and Arctic Redpol l C hornemanni is still debated (Molau 1985, Troy 1985) . Knox (1988) has shown that claims of hybridization between Redpoll and Arctic Redpoll are either un- founded or misinterpreted. He conciudes that these taxa constitute good species. His conclusions are supported by my findings that Redpoll and Arctic Redpoll are distinct in a discriminant analysis of four standard body measurements : only 5% of the birds in a sample of over 500 Redpolls and Arc- tic Redpolls were in the area of overlap (Herremans in prep) . It has been pointed out by Soviet ornithologists that the vocalizations of Red- poll and Arctic Redpoll show distinct features (see Knox for review) . So far, no detailed descriptions of these vocalizations have been published in the `western' ornithological literature. It seems, therefore, useful to present here my data on the vocalizations of Common Redpoil C f flammea, Lesser Redpoll C f cabaret and Arctic Redpoll of the subspecies C h exilrpes occurring as migrants in Belgium . The data confirm the existence of differences in their non- breeding vocalizations . methods Since 1975, at Heverlee, Brabant, Belgium, 1 have ringed c 500 Common Red- polls, c 400 Lesser Redpolls and six Arctic Redpolis . This and the keeping of decoys enabled me to become familiar with their vocalizations . During the large irruption of redpolls in western Europe in the winter of 1986/87, 1 have sound recorded several Commons (inciuding holboelfrí-type birds, represen- ting the longer-billed individuals from the skewed and very broad bill length distribution of Common Redpoll) and Lessers and two Arctics when kept tem- porarily in captivity .
    [Show full text]
  • Redpolls by Ron Pittaway
    108 Recognizable Forms Redpolls by Ron Pittaway Introduction (1988) treats it as representing very The American Ornithologists' long-billed individuals of nominate e. Union Check-list (1983) recognizes r [lammea. The Hoary Redpoll also two species of redpolls: Common has two subspecies in Canada: a Redpoll (earduelis flammea) and small southern race (e. h. exilipes) Hoary Redpoll (e. hornemannis. and the larger northern nominate Each species has two well-marked race (e. h. hornemannii. subspecies in Canada (Godfrey 1986). Troy's (1985) widely read and However, the taxonomy of redpolls much quoted study concluded that has been much debated. Some the southern race of the Common authors suggest lumping all redpolls Redpoll (e. [. flammea) and the into a single species, while others southern race of the Hoary Redpoll propose splitting them into four (e. h. exilipes) should be lumped as separate species. Regardless of how one highly variable species. His many species there are, classic assumption was that intermediate individuals of each of the four forms birds represented hybrids. This view are recognizable in the field. The appealed to many ornithologists, legendary George North of Hamilton birders and banders who had found actually saw the four forms of themselves perplexed by redpoll redpolls in one flock at Aldershot on identification. However, later 23 March 1958 (North 1983)! In order researchers questioned Troy's to recognize these forms, we require taxonomic conclusions. Seutin et al. a sound knowledge of the field (1989) noted that Troy failed "to take marks, plus a thorough understanding age dimorphism into consideration in of redpoll plumages, effects of wear, his analysis".
    [Show full text]
  • Arctic Species Trend Index: Migratory Birds Index
    CAFF Assessment Series Report September 2015 Arctic Species Trend Index: Migratory Birds Index ARCTIC COUNCIL Acknowledgements CAFF Designated Agencies: • Norwegian Environment Agency, Trondheim, Norway • Environment Canada, Ottawa, Canada • Faroese Museum of Natural History, Tórshavn, Faroe Islands (Kingdom of Denmark) • Finnish Ministry of the Environment, Helsinki, Finland • Icelandic Institute of Natural History, Reykjavik, Iceland • Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Greenland • Russian Federation Ministry of Natural Resources, Moscow, Russia • Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, Stockholm, Sweden • United States Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Anchorage, Alaska CAFF Permanent Participant Organizations: • Aleut International Association (AIA) • Arctic Athabaskan Council (AAC) • Gwich’in Council International (GCI) • Inuit Circumpolar Council (ICC) • Russian Indigenous Peoples of the North (RAIPON) • Saami Council This publication should be cited as: Deinet, S., Zöckler, C., Jacoby, D., Tresize, E., Marconi, V., McRae, L., Svobods, M., & Barry, T. (2015). The Arctic Species Trend Index: Migratory Birds Index. Conservation of Arctic Flora and Fauna, Akureyri, Iceland. ISBN: 978-9935-431-44-8 Cover photo: Arctic tern. Photo: Mark Medcalf/Shutterstock.com Back cover: Red knot. Photo: USFWS/Flickr Design and layout: Courtney Price For more information please contact: CAFF International Secretariat Borgir, Nordurslod 600 Akureyri, Iceland Phone: +354 462-3350 Fax: +354 462-3390 Email: [email protected] Internet: www.caff.is This report was commissioned and funded by the Conservation of Arctic Flora and Fauna (CAFF), the Biodiversity Working Group of the Arctic Council. Additional funding was provided by WWF International, the Zoological Society of London (ZSL) and the Convention on Migratory Species (CMS). The views expressed in this report are the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Arctic Council or its members.
    [Show full text]
  • The Influx of Redpolls Into Western Europe, 1995/96 R
    Mike Klangman Mike The influx of redpolls into Western Europe, 1995/96 R. Riddington, S. C.Votier and J. Steele ABSTRACT Winter 1995/96 saw a huge influx of Common Redpolls Carduelis flammea and Arctic Redpolls C. hornemanni into Britain and Western Europe. Two forms of redpoll were involved, the nominate race of Common Redpoll C. f. flammea (‘Mealy Redpoll’) and the Eurasian race of Arctic Redpoll C. h. exilipes, and there is no evidence of any arrivals from other than northern Eurasian populations. Three main influxes were recorded in the north and east of Britain. The first two, in early and mid November, were immediately preceded by or coincided with substantial movements through Utsira in southwest Norway, Heligoland off the northwest coast of Germany, and Falsterbo in southern Sweden; the last of the three arrivals occurred in early December and was associated with the onset of very cold weather, but not with large movements farther north and east. On the British east coast, numbers were the largest since 1975. Heading drawing. Two Arctic Redpolls and one Common Redpoll. © British Birds 93: 59-67, February 2000 59 Riddington et al.: Influx of redpolls in 1995/96 The irruption was absorbed in Britain, and no significant movements were recorded through bird observatories on southern and western coasts. Return spring migration was heavy through southern North Sea sites (which experienced little of the autumn arrival), but was much less apparent farther north. wo species of redpoll occur in in Western Europe. A combination of the Western Europe (fig. 1). Common factors described above forced birds to move TRedpoll Carduelis flammea is a west and south from their breeding grounds familiar breeding bird and/or winter visitor in Norway, north and central Sweden, throughout much of the region, while Arctic Finland and northern Russia.
    [Show full text]
  • Polar Ecology
    Woodcut by Aron of Kangeq, Nuuk, 1860 Off Ilulissat, Greenland FREDRIK EHRENSTRÖM STEFAN LUNDGREN Svalbard KUBUS 35 Polar Ecology The polar bear is hungry. Using her sensitive nose, she searches for a seal. She spots one lying on the ice, and as she creeps closer, her steps become careful. The seal has good hearing, good eyesight, and a good sense of smell. It is ready to dive into the water as soon as it senses danger nearby. So, very stealthily, the polar bear puts one paw in front of the other in the snow until she is only 30 meters from her prey. Her final rush is an explosion of energy, and she pounces on the seal. This time, luck is with her, and she enjoys a good meal of seal blubber, her favorite food. The rest of the seal is left behind when she moves on over the ice, but close behind comes the Arctic fox, like a shadow waiting for its share. This meal on the ice illustrates two key points in discussing contaminants in the Arctic. Predation is the pathway by which contaminants move from animal to animal in Arctic food webs. Moreover, it is no coincidence that the polar bear is a picky eater when hunting is good, choosing only the blubber and leav- ing the rest of the seal. Energy is important for sur- vival in cold environments and a preference for fatty foods is one of many adaptations shown by Arctic animals. This chapter discusses plant and animal life in the Arctic, with a focus on adaptations that can make Arctic ecosystems especially vulnerable to contami- nants.
    [Show full text]
  • Worcestershire Redpolls and a Guide to Their Separation
    Worcestershire Redpolls and a guide to their separation Plate 1 - Lesser Redpolls, Wyre Forest, Worcestershire, December 2005. © John Robinson In a landlocked county like Worcestershire, the arrival of winter finch flocks undoubtedly enthuses county birders during the winter months, particularly those who find gulls and waterfowl less than inspiring. With a little effort, ten species are obtainable annually, including Brambling, Common Crossbill, Hawfinch, Lesser Redpoll and Siskin; whilst Mealy Redpoll and Twite may boost this total, though the latter has become extremely scarce locally in recent years. The planting of game crops, primarily designed to provide food and cover for Pleasant and Partridge prior and during the winter shoots, inevitably attract large winter finch flocks, particularly Linnet, Goldfinch, Greenfinch, Chaffinch, Brambling and Redpoll. These sites provide observers the best opportunely to study these birds, being confined to a relatively small area, allowing close and often prolonged, eye-level views to be obtained. Though generally not the most colourful of our finches, Redpoll still possess a striking combination of black, buff and white plumage contrasts, whilst a male’s vivid crimson breast is no less than spectacular. Numbers may fluctuate from one winter to the next, but in years when the Silver Birch crop fails in Scandinavia, mass eruptions occur. During these periods Redpoll can become very numerous, particularly along the east coast of Britain, hence good-sized flocks often arrive in Worcestershire at this time. These flocks comprise both Lesser and Mealy Redpolls, with Arctic also a possibility and species separation can often challenge even the most experienced observers. Redpoll has been slip into three species, Lesser Redpoll (Acanthis cabaret), Common Redpoll (Acanthis flammea) and Arctic Redpoll (Acanthis hornemanni).
    [Show full text]
  • Arctic Biodiversity Assessment
    142 Arctic Biodiversity Assessment Incubating red knot Calidris canutus after a snowfall at Cape Sterlegova, Taimyr, Siberia, 27 June 1991. This shorebird represents the most numerically dominating and species rich group of birds on the tundra and the harsh conditions that these hardy birds experience in the high Arctic. Photo: Jan van de Kam. 143 Chapter 4 Birds Lead Authors Barbara Ganter and Anthony J. Gaston Contributing Authors Tycho Anker-Nilssen, Peter Blancher, David Boertmann, Brian Collins, Violet Ford, Arnþór Garðasson, Gilles Gauthier, Maria V. Gavrilo, Grant Gilchrist, Robert E. Gill, David Irons, Elena G. Lappo, Mark Mallory, Flemming Merkel, Guy Morrison, Tero Mustonen, Aevar Petersen, Humphrey P. Sitters, Paul Smith, Hallvard Strøm, Evgeny E. Syroechkovskiy and Pavel S. Tomkovich Contents Summary ..............................................................144 4.5. Seabirds: loons, petrels, cormorants, jaegers/skuas, gulls, terns and auks .....................................................160 4.1. Introduction .......................................................144 4.5.1. Species richness and distribution ............................160 4.2. Status of knowledge ..............................................144 4.5.1.1. Status ...............................................160 4.2.1. Sources and regions .........................................144 4.5.1.2. Endemicity ..........................................161 4.2.2. Biogeography ..............................................147 4.5.1.3. Trends ..............................................161
    [Show full text]
  • Finchrefs Ver1.0.Pdf
    Introduction I have endeavoured to keep typos, errors, omissions etc in this list to a minimum, however when you find more I would be grateful if you could mail the details during 2016 & 2017 to: [email protected]. Please note that this and other Reference Lists I have compiled are not exhaustive and are best employed in conjunction with other sources. Grateful thanks to Tom Shevlin (www.wildlifesnaps.com) for the cover images. All images © the photographer. Joe Hobbs Index The general order of species follows the International Ornithologists' Union World Bird List (Gill, F. & Donsker, D. (eds.) 2016. IOC World Bird List. Available from: http://www.worldbirdnames.org/ [version 6.1 accessed February 2016]). Version Version 1.0 (May 2016). Cover Main image: Twite. Raghly Harbour, County Sligo, Ireland. 6th December 2009. Picture by Tom Shevlin. Vignette: Linnet. Soldier's Point, County Louth, Ireland. 9th December 2007. Picture by Tom Shevlin. Species Page No. Arctic Redpoll [Acanthis hornemanni] 9 Common Redpoll [Acanthis sp.] 6 Lesser Redpoll [Acanthis cabaret] 6 Linnet [Linaria cannabina] 4 Mealy Redpoll [Acanthis flammea] 6 Twite [Linaria flavirostris] 3 Warsangli Linnet [Linaria johannis] 6 Yemen Linnet [Linaria yemenensis] 6 1 Relevant Publications Balmer, D. et al. 2013. Bird Atlas 2001-11: The breeding and wintering birds of Britain and Ireland. BTO Books, Thetford. Beadle, D. & Rising, J.D. 2006. Tanagers, Cardinals, and Finches of the United States and Canada: The Photographic Guide. Princeton University Press. Beaman, M. 1994. Palearctic birds: a checklist of the birds of Europe, North Africa and Asia north of the foothills of the Himalayas.
    [Show full text]
  • Low/No Genetic Support for Separate Redpoll Species Carduelis Flammea Â
    Genetic differentiation within and between bird populations – taxonomic and phylogeographic implications by Gunnhild Marthinsen Dissertation presented for the degree of Philosophiae Doctor Natural History Museum Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences University of Oslo © Gunnhild Marthinsen, 2007 Series of dissertations submitted to the Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Oslo. No. 656 ISSN 1501-7710 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without permission. Cover: Inger Sandved Anfinsen. Printed in Norway: AiT e-dit AS, Oslo, 2007. Produced in co-operation with Unipub AS. The thesis is produced by Unipub AS merely in connection with the thesis defence. Kindly direct all inquiries regarding the thesis to the copyright holder or the unit which grants the doctorate. Unipub AS is owned by The University Foundation for Student Life (SiO) Supervisor Co-supervisor Jan T. Lifjeld Liv Wennerberg Professor PhD Natural History Museum Natural History Museum University of Oslo University of Oslo Norway Norway Adjudicating committee 1st opponent H. Lisle Gibbs Professor Department of Evolution, Ecology, and Organismal Biology Ohio State University USA 2nd opponent Jacob Höglund Professor Department of Ecology and Evolution, Population Biology Uppsala University Sweden Administrative leader Lutz Bachmann Professor Natural History Museum University of Oslo Norway Acknowledgements Jan, thank you for being, as Frode put it, the best supervisor in Norway. Thank you for being so open-minded, and for all interesting discussions on subspecies etc. Thank you for always being available, and for asking not too much, not too little of me.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 Arctic Ecosystems 5 2.1 Terrestrial Ecosystems 7 2.2 Freshwater Ecosystems 10 2.3 Marine Ecosystems 11
    CENTRE FOR ECOLOGY AND HYDROLOGY NATURAL ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH COUNCIL Environmental Protection from Ionising Contaminants (EPIC) CONTRACT NO: ICA2-CT-2000-10032 CEH PROJECT No: C01608 Reference Arctic Organisms Edited by N A Beresford1, S M Wright1 & T Sazykina 2 Contributors: J Brown3, C L Barnett1, I Kryshev2, R Brooker4, J Bass5, B J Howard1, N Webb5, D French4, A Kryshev2, P Strand3 & H Stensrud3 November 2001 1CEH-Merlewood, Windermere Road, Grange-over-Sands, Cumbria, LA11 6JU, UK. 2Scientific & Production Association “TYPHOON”, 82 Lenin Av., Obninsk, Kaluga Region, 249038, Russia. 3Stratens Strålevern, Grini Næringspark 13, P.O. Box 55, N1332, Østerås, Norway. 4CEH-Banchory, Hill of Brathens, Banchory, Aberdeenshire, AB31 4BY, UK. 5CEH-Dorset, Winfrith Technology Centre, Dorchester, Dorset, DT2 8ZD, UK. Funded under the European Commission Inco-Copernicus programme Environmental Protection from Ionising Contaminants (EPIC) To date, the protection of the environment from radiation is based on the premise that if Man is protected from harm, then all other components of the ecosystem will not be at risk. However, this has been increasingly questioned on the basis that it is not always true, it is inconsistent with environmental protection standards for other hazardous materials and conflicts with the recommendations of some international advisory bodies. The aim of the EPIC project is to develop a methodology for the protection of natural populations of organisms in Arctic ecosystems from radiation. This will be achieved by derivation
    [Show full text]