DOCSLIB.ORG

Level 1 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Level 1 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Level 1 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Epping Forest District Council Harlow Council March 2010 1 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Final Report Issue Date: xxx Prepared by: Ben Meuli Checked by: xxx (EFDC), xxx (Harlow) Approved by: xxx (EFDC), xxx (Harlow) Version History Version xx.xx Revised xx.xx.xx 2 CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION................................................................................................5 1.1 OVERVIEW .....................................................................................................................5 1.2 AIMS AND OBJECTIVES ....................................................................................................5 1.3 THE SEQUENTIAL AND EXCEPTION TESTS....................................................................6 2. FLOOD RISK IN EPPING FOREST AND HARLOW DISTRICTS.......................8 2.1 STUDY AREA ..................................................................................................................8 2.1.1 Epping Forest..................................................................................................................8 2.1.2 Harlow..............................................................................................................................9 2.2. GEOGRAPHY, GEOLOGY AND RIVER CATCHMENTS.............................................................9 2.2.1 Epping Forest ...................................................................................................................9 2.2.2 Harlow............................................................................................................................10 2.3 HISTORY OF FLOODING .................................................................................................11 2.3.1 Epping Forest .................................................................................................................11 2.3.2 Harlow............................................................................................................................12 3. POLICY FRAMEWORK....................................................................................13 3.1 OVERVIEW ...................................................................................................................13 3.2 OBJECTIVE ..................................................................................................................13 3.3 THE EUROPEAN POLICY FRAMEWORK ............................................................................13 3.3.1 The Water Framework Directive 2000..........................................................................13 3.3.2 The Habitats Directive 1992..........................................................................................13 3.4 NATIONAL POLICY AND LEGISLATION IN ENGLAND ............................................................13 3.4.1 The Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004.......................................................13 3.4.2 Future Water 2007.........................................................................................................14 3.4.3 The Town and Country Planning (Flooding) (England) Direction 2007......................14 3.4.4 The Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development)(Amendment) (No. 2) England) Order 2008 Guidance on the Permeable Surfacing of Front Gardens – 10 September 2008......................................................................................................................14 3.4.5 Surface Water Management Plan (SWMP) Technical Guidance – Living draft version 1 (February 2009)...................................................................................................................14 3.4.6 The Flood Risk Regulations 2009..................................................................................15 3.4.7 The Flood and Water Management Act (2010).............................................................15 3.4.8 Planning policy statements............................................................................................16 3.4.9 Planning Policy Statement 1: Delivering Sustainable Development (PPS1) and PPS: Planning and Climate Change – Supplement to PPS1 (2007) and Planning Policy Statement Consultation: Planning for a Low Carbon Future in a Changing Climate (March 2010)....16 3.4.10 Planning Policy Statement 3: Housing (PPS3) (2007).................................................16 3.4.11 Planning Policy Statement 25: Development and Flood Risk (PPS 25) (2010) Planning Policy Statement 25: Development and Flood Risk - Practice Guide – Published 7 December 2009........................................................................................................................................16 3.5 REGIONAL PLANNING POLICY ........................................................................................17 3.5.1 Thames Catchment Flood Management Plan – Managing flood risk (2009)...............17 3.5.2 Rye Meads Water Cycle Strategy..................................................................................17 3.6 LOCAL PLANNING POLICY..............................................................................................17 3.6.1 EFDC Local Plan (1998)................................................................................................17 3.6.2 Replacement Harlow Local Plan (2006) .........................................................................19 4. STRATEGIC FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT.....................................................21 4.1 OVERVIEW...................................................................................................................21 4.2 LIST OF MAPS ..............................................................................................................21 4.3 LIST OF DATA SOURCES ................................................................................................21 4.4 FLUVIAL FLOODING.......................................................................................................22 4.5 SURFACE WATER FLOODING ..........................................................................................26 4.6 GROUNDWATER FLOODING............................................................................................26 4.7 SEWER FLOODING ........................................................................................................27 3 4.8 FLOOD INFRASTRUCTURE AND ARTIFICIAL SOURCES OF FLOODING ....................................27 4.8.1 Epping Forest District.....................................................................................................28 4.8.2 Harlow............................................................................................................................30 4.9 RESIDUAL RISK ............................................................................................................30 4.10 CLIMATE CHANGE.......................................................................................................31 5. EMERGENCY PLANNING...............................................................................32 5.1 CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE ..........................................................................................32 5.2 FLOOD WARNING..........................................................................................................32 6. DEVELOPMENT GUIDANCE...........................................................................34 6.1 REQUIREMENTS FOR SITE SPECIFIC FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT .........................................34 6.2 DEVELOPMENT WITHIN EPPING FOREST DISTRICT AND EFDC FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT ZONES 35 6.3 SUDS – SUSTAINABLE DRAINAGE SYSTEMS...................................................................36 7. RECOMMENDATIONS.....................................................................................38 7.1 CLIMATE CHANGE.........................................................................................................38 7.2 FUNCTIONAL FLOODPLAIN/FLOOD ALLEVIATION AND STORAGE SCHEMES .............................38 7.3 OTHER FORMS OF FLOODING .........................................................................................38 7.4 SITE ALLOCATIONS .......................................................................................................38 7.5 DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS...........................................................................................39 7.6 EMERGENCY PLANNING/RISK AWARENESS .......................................................................39 8. ABBREVIATIONS AND GLOSSARY...............................................................41 9. REFERENCES.................................................................................................45 10. APPENDICES...................................................................................................46 List of Figures and Tables FIGURE 1 STUDY AREA 8 TABLE 1 SFRA DATA SOURCES 19 TABLE 2 FLOOD ZONE DEFINITIONS FROM PPS25 20 TABLE 3 FLOOD ZONE 3B DATA SOURCES 21 TABLE 4 FLOOD ZONE 3A DATA SOURCES 22 TABLE 5 FLOOD ZONE 2 DATA SOURCES 22 TABLE 6 CLIMATE CHANGE FLOOD ZONE 3A DATA SOURCES 23 TABLE 7 CLIMATE CHANGE FLOOD ZONE 3B DATA SOURCES 23 TABLE 8 EMERGENCY PLANNING INFRASTRUCTURE 30 TABLE 9 COMMON SUDS METHODS 35 List of maps Map 1 Watercourses, ponds, lakes, Main Rivers Map 2 Main River catchments Map 3 Historical flooding incidents Map 4 Flood Zones Map 5 Climate change Map 6 Areas susceptible to surface water flooding Map
Load more

Recommended publications
  • HA16 Rivers and Streams London's Rivers and Streams Resource
    HA16 Rivers and Streams Definition All free-flowing watercourses above the tidal limit London’s rivers and streams resource The total length of watercourses (not including those with a tidal influence) are provided in table 1a and 1b. These figures are based on catchment areas and do not include all watercourses or small watercourses such as drainage ditches. Table 1a: Catchment area and length of fresh water rivers and streams in SE London Watercourse name Length (km) Catchment area (km2) Hogsmill 9.9 73 Surbiton stream 6.0 Bonesgate stream 5.0 Horton stream 5.3 Greens lane stream 1.8 Ewel court stream 2.7 Hogsmill stream 0.5 Beverley Brook 14.3 64 Kingsmere stream 3.1 Penponds overflow 1.3 Queensmere stream 2.4 Keswick avenue ditch 1.2 Cannizaro park stream 1.7 Coombe Brook 1 Pyl Brook 5.3 East Pyl Brook 3.9 old pyl ditch 0.7 Merton ditch culvert 4.3 Grand drive ditch 0.5 Wandle 26.7 202 Wimbledon park stream 1.6 Railway ditch 1.1 Summerstown ditch 2.2 Graveney/ Norbury brook 9.5 Figgs marsh ditch 3.6 Bunces ditch 1.2 Pickle ditch 0.9 Morden Hall loop 2.5 Beddington corner branch 0.7 Beddington effluent ditch 1.6 Oily ditch 3.9 Cemetery ditch 2.8 Therapia ditch 0.9 Micham road new culvert 2.1 Station farm ditch 0.7 Ravenbourne 17.4 180 Quaggy (kyd Brook) 5.6 Quaggy hither green 1 Grove park ditch 0.5 Milk street ditch 0.3 Ravensbourne honor oak 1.9 Pool river 5.1 Chaffinch Brook 4.4 Spring Brook 1.6 The Beck 7.8 St James stream 2.8 Nursery stream 3.3 Konstamm ditch 0.4 River Cray 12.6 45 River Shuttle 6.4 Wincham Stream 5.6 Marsh Dykes
    [Show full text]
  • 36 Highbridge Street, Waltham Abbey
    36 HIGHBRIDGE STREET, WALTHAM ABBEY Flood Risk Assessment and Surface Water Drainage Statement Alcomax (Investments) Ltd SLR Ref: 408-07833-00001 Version No: 5 October 2018 36 Highbridge Street, Waltham Abbey : FRA and SWDS Filename: 181017_408-07833-00001_36HSWA_FRA_v5 SLR Ref No: 408-07833-00001 October 2018 BASIS OF REPORT This document has been prepared by SLR Consulting Limited with reasonable skill, care and diligence, and taking account of the manpower, timescales and resources devoted to it by agreement with Alcomax (Investments) Ltd. (the Client) as part or all of the services it has been appointed by the Client to carry out. It is subject to the terms and conditions of that appointment. SLR shall not be liable for the use of or reliance on any information, advice, recommendations and opinions in this document for any purpose by any person other than the Client. Reliance may be granted to a third party only in the event that SLR and the third party have executed a reliance agreement or collateral warranty. Information reported herein may be based on the interpretation of public domain data collected by SLR, and/or information supplied by the Client and/or its other advisors and associates. These data have been accepted in good faith as being accurate and valid. The copyright and intellectual property in all drawings, reports, specifications, bills of quantities, calculations and other information set out in this report remain vested in SLR unless the terms of appointment state otherwise. This document may contain information of a specialised and/or highly technical nature and the Client is advised to seek clarification on any elements which may be unclear to it.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Plan Respresentations
    29 January 2018 bc Local Plan Regulation 19 Representation Planning Policy Team Epping Forest District Council Civic Offices Ben Thomas 323 High Street Epping Essex CM16 4BZ 33 Margaret Street London W1G 0JD T: +44 (0) 20 7499 8644 savills.com Epping Forest District Council Submission Version Local Plan We write on behalf of Crest Nicholson in relation to the site known as the former Pickfield Nursery at Pick Hill, Waltham Abbey (SLAA Reference SR-0161). Flawed / Absent Local Plan site selection process to-date: Pickfield Nursery was submitted to EFDC in response to the Call for Sites consultation in 2008 and has subsequently been promoted through the current Local Plan process since its inception in 2012. EFDC’s July 2012 SLAA referred to Pickfield Nursery as site SR-0161 but incorrectly identified it as a duplicate site with a much larger parcel (SLAA Reference SR-0020). Representations were then submitted in October 2012 highlighting this mistake. However, despite the submission of detailed representations and subsequent regular liaison with EFDC’s officers (including a positive formal pre-application meeting), EFDC’s Site Selection evidence base published in 2016 discounted Pickfield Nursery prior to Stage 1 of the selection process, once again incorrectly considering it as a duplicate site. Pickfield Nursery was finally acknowledged as an individual site in the Local Plan evidence base in the “Sites for consideration following Regulation 18 consultation” list published in July 2017. However, at the time of writing these representations (26th January 2018, one working day before the Pre-Submission consultation deadline) an assessment of these sites has still not been undertaken and Appendix C1 of the Report on Site Selection (December 2017) has not been completed.
    [Show full text]
  • Epping Forest District Local Plan Report on Site Selection Appendix C - Settlement Proformas
    Epping Forest District Local Plan Report on Site Selection Appendix C - Settlement Proformas ISSUE | September 2016 This report takes into account the particular instructions and requirements of our client. It is not intended for and should not be relied upon by any third party and no responsibility is undertaken to any third party. Job number Ove Arup & Partners Ltd 13 Fitzroy Street London W1T 4BQ United Kingdom www.arup.com Document Verification Job title Settlement hierarchy and town centres review Job number Document title Interim Progress Note File reference Document ref Revision Date Filename Interim Progress Note 18 07 16 Issue.docx Draft 1 1 8 Jul Description First draft 2016 Prepared by Checked by Approved by M J Thompson Name Richard Katz M J Thompson N White Fran Dance Signature Final 06 Filename Town Centre Proforma 060916.docx Draft September Description Final Draft 2016 Prepared by Checked by Approved by M J Thompson Name Richard Katz M J Thompson N White Fran Dance Signature Issue Filename Town Centre Proforma 200916.docx Description Issue Prepared by Checked by Approved by Name Signature Filename Description Prepared by Checked by Approved by Name Signature Issue Document Verification with Document | Issue | 18 July 2016 C:\USERS\KSTWOMEY\APPDATA\LOCAL\MICROSOFT\WINDOWS\TEMPORARY INTERNET FILES\CONTENT.OUTLOOK\E0PA9Z7E\APPENDIX C (SITE SELECTION) - SETTLEMENT PROFORMAS FINAL 160930.DOCX Epping Forest District Council Settlement hierarchy and town centres review Interim Progress Note | Issue | 18 July 2016 C:\USERS\KSTWOMEY\APPDATA\LOCAL\MICROSOFT\WINDOWS\TEMPORARY
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluating the Risk of Non-Point Source Pollution From
    Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 11(1), 601613, 2007 Evaluating the risk of non-point source pollution from biosolids: integrated modelling of nutrient losses at field and catchment scales www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/11/601/2007 © Author(s) 2007. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License. Evaluating the risk of non-point source pollution from biosolids: integrated modelling of nutrient losses at field and catchment scales P.G. Whitehead1, A.L. Heathwaite2, N.J. Flynn1, A.J. Wade1 and P.F. Quinn3 1Aquatic Environments Research Centre, Department of Geography, University of Reading, Whiteknights, Reading, RG6 6AB, UK 2Centre for Sustainable Water Management, Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YQ, UK 3Department of Civil Engineering, University of Newcastle, NewcastleUK Email for corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract A semi-distributed model, INCA, has been developed to determine the fate and distribution of nutrients in terrestrial and aquatic systems. The model simulates nitrogen and phosphorus processes in soils, groundwaters and river systems and can be applied in a semi-distributed manner at a range of scales. In this study, the model has been applied at field to sub-catchment to whole catchment scale to evaluate the behaviour of biosolid-derived losses of P in agricultural systems. It is shown that process-based models such as INCA, applied at a wide range of scales, reproduce field and catchment behaviour satisfactorily. The INCA model can also be used to generate generic information for risk assessment. By adjusting three key variables: biosolid application rates, the hydrological connectivity of the catchment and the initial P-status of the soils within the model, a matrix of P loss rates can be generated to evaluate the behaviour of the model and, hence, of the catchment system.
    [Show full text]
  • Essex Flood Risk Management Strategy 2013
    Flood & Water Management Essex County Council Local Flood Risk Management Strategy February 2013 Document Information Title: Local Flood Risk Management Strategy Owner: Essex County Council Version: 0.3 Status: Draft Project Number: CS/061570 File Name: Essex LFRMS - Updated - v0pt3 DRAFT.doc REVISION HISTORY Details and Summary of Changes Completed By Date of Issue Version Original Document Essex County Council April 2012 N/A Review and update structure, contents and figures Capita Symonds January 2013 0.1 Response to review comments from ECC and Capita Symonds February 0.2 addition of consultation comments 2013 Response to HRA and review comments from EA Capita Symonds March 2013 0.3 AUTHORS Name Role and Organisation Michael Arthur Principal Consultant - Capita Symonds APPROVALS Name Title Signature Date Jo Carrington Flood Data Management Engineer 08/04/2013 Lucy Shepherd Flood Partnerships Manager 08/04/2013 This document and related appendices have been reviewed and updated on behalf of Essex County Council by: 7th Floor, 52 Grosvenor Gardens, Belgravia, London SW1W 0AU Tel 0207 808 4520 Fax 0207 901 9901 www.capitasymonds.co.uk Local Flood Risk Management Strategy March 2013 i Foreword This is the first Essex Strategy for Flood Risk Management and it is a key step in making sure that the risk of flooding in Essex is dealt with as whole, joining up the work done by councils, government bodies and water companies with that of communities and individual households. It will consider how all sorts of activities can help manage flood risk, from better planning which makes sure new developments decrease rather than increase flood risk for its neighbours, to ensuring that emergency responses have a good understanding of where flood risk is greatest.
    [Show full text]
  • The Essex County Council (Hatfield Forest Road) (Temporary Stopping Restriction) Order 2020
    The Essex County Council (Hatfield Forest Road) (Temporary Stopping Restriction) Order 2020 Notice is hereby given Colchester Borough Council acting on behalf of the North Essex Parking Partnership in exercise of the delegated powers of the traffic authority Essex County Council granted under an Agreement dated 31 March 2011 proposes to make a temporary Order under Sections 14(1) of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 The effect of the Order: To temporarily replace current double yellow lines (No Waiting At Any Time) with double red lines (No Stopping At Any Time) on the entire lengths of Hatfield Forest Road and Bush End Road, and on each side of the junction with Hatfield Forest Road on The Street (B1256) in the district of Uttlesford. Nothing in the Order shall apply to anything done with the permission or at the direction of a police constable in uniform or a Civil Enforcement Officer. Nothing in the Order shall apply to any emergency vehicles. The Order is proposed come into operation on 29 June 2020 to remain in force for a period of up to 18 months. Date: 18 June 2020 Richard Walker, Parking Partnership Group Manager, Colchester Borough Council, Rowan House, 33 Sheepen Road, Colchester, CO3 3WG Tile Reference: TL545 210 SEE STATIC MAP SCHEDULE LEGEND FOR RESTRICTIONS DIS PROPOSED HHiiiiililllllllllcccrrrrooofffffttttt TTiiiiiimmbbbeeerrrr HHooouuussseee WWoooooodddsssiiiiididdeee CCoootttttttttaaagggeee DDrrrraaakkkeeelllllalaannndddsss P a t h ( u m SStttttaaannnhhhooollllllmm ) TThhheee BBuuunnngggaaalllllloooww WWoooooodddbbbrrrriiiiiaiaarrrr
    [Show full text]
  • (Uttlesford District) (Prohibition of Waiting, Loading and Stopping) and (On-Street Parking Places) (Civil Enforcement Area) (Amendment Number 13) Order 202*
    The Essex County Council (Uttlesford District) (Prohibition of Waiting, Loading and Stopping) and (On-Street Parking Places) (Civil Enforcement Area) (Amendment Number 13) Order 202* Notice is hereby given Colchester Borough Council acting on behalf of the North Essex Parking Partnership in exercise of the delegated powers of the traffic authority Essex County Council granted under an Agreement dated 31 March 2011 proposes to make the above Order under Sections 1(1), 2(1) to (3), 4(1), 4(2), 32, 35, 45, 46, 49 and 53 and Parts III and IV of schedule 9 of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984. The effect of the Order: To introduce resident permit holder parking outside Black House Cottages, Hatfield Forest Road; to replace current double yellow lines (No Waiting At Any Time) with red route ‘No Stopping At Any Time’ restrictions on Hatfield Forest Road, Bush End and on each side of the junction with Hatfield Forest Road on The Street (B1256); to revoke double yellow lines (No Waiting At Any Time) on Howe Green Road and Forest Way and to introduce red route (No Stopping At Any Time) restrictions on Hatfield Forest Road, Bury Lodge Lane, Howe Green Road, Forest Way and Wood Row in the District of Uttlesford. This Order will be incorporated into The Essex County Council (Uttlesford District) (Prohibition of Waiting, Loading and Stopping) and (On-Street Parking Places) (Civil Enforcement Area) Consolidation Order 2019 by replacing tile numbers TL525 185, TL530 190 TL545 195, TL545 197, TL545 200, TL545 202, TL545 205, TL545 207, TL545 210 with revision 1 and inserting tile numbers TL520 182, TL520 185, TL530 182, TL530 212, TL535 185, TL545 190, TL545 192 at revision 0.
    [Show full text]
  • Harlow Local Development Plan Examination Matter 4: Strategic Housing Site East of Harlow Epping Forest District Council Hearing Statement
    HARLOW LOCAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN EXAMINATION MATTER 4: STRATEGIC HOUSING SITE EAST OF HARLOW HEARING STATEMENT ON BEHALF OF EPPING FOREST DISTRICT COUNCIL MARCH 2019 Harlow Local Development Plan Examination Matter 4: Strategic Housing Site East of Harlow Epping Forest District Council Hearing Statement INTRODUCTION 1. Epping Forest District Council ("EFDC") submits this statement in response to the Inspector's Matters and Questions. 2. This statement concerns Matter 4: Strategic Housing Site East of Harlow and EFDC's responses are limited to addressing the Inspector's Questions 4.3, 4.5, 4.6, 4.7, 4.8, 4.10 and 4.11. 3. It is important to note that EFDC did not make Regulation 20 representations at the publication stage and does not object to the HLDP, or seek any changes to the version of the HLDP submitted to the Secretary of State for independent examination. 4. To a very large extent, EFDC has addressed these matters within its Hearing Statement for the Epping Forest District Local Plan ("EFDLP") Examination and/or through the ongoing discussions with Essex County Council (“ECC”) relating to a Statement of Common Ground (“SOCG”). 5. All documents referred to in this statement are listed in Appendix A of this statement together with links to the relevant document included within the Examination Library. 6. Attached to this statement (at Appendix B) are the relevant Hearing Statements prepared for the EFDLP Examination, as follows: • Matter 1: Legal Compliance • Matter 4: The Spatial Strategy / Distribution of Development • Matter 8: Garden Town Communities 7. Wherever possible, HLDP Examination Library document references are used throughout this statement for consistency and convenience.
    [Show full text]
  • RIVER STORT DRAFT CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN May 1991
    NRA Thames 252 RIVER STORT DRAFT CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN FLOOD DEFENCE AND THE ENVIRONMENT May 1991 NRA National Rii'ers Authority Thames Region U lJ \ T lW ltS RIVER STORT DRAFT CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR FLOOD DEFENCE AND THE ENVIRONMENT MAY 1991 prepared by The National Rivers Authority Thames Region with the assistance of Land Use Consultants Flynn and Kothweii Herts and Middlesex Wildlife Trust Essex Wildlife Trust Lee Donaldson Associates ENVIRONMENT AGENCY 123198 A VISION FOR THE RIVER STORT CATCHMENT The river corridors of ihe Stort Catchment are a valuable natural resource, comprising sensitive ecological habitats, a landscape of considerable diversity and value, and areas which are popular for informal recreation. The Stort Navigation is of particular historical significance and its characteristics make it unique in the Thames Region. The objective of the NRA TR is to conserve and, wherever possible, enhance the value of this resource. This will be achieved through appropriate direct management of the water environment, including the provision of appropriate standards of urban flood protection, and partnership with the riparian local authorities, British Waterways Board and other interested organisations. A central part of this objective is to secure the designation of the corridor of the Lower Stort Valley and the Stort Navigation as a ’Special Heritage Area* in the statutory development plans. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Aim of the Catchment Management Plan Under the 1989 Water Act the National Rivers Authority (NRA) is required to conserve and enhance the water environment. Such an important role requires a multi-disciplinary approach; catchment management planning seeks to provide a multi-disciplinary strategy for each catchment.
    [Show full text]
  • Harlow and Gilston Garden Town Annual Review
    Annual Review (April 2018 to March 2019) Image courtesy of Places for People is for illustrative purposes only HARLOW & GILSTON GARDEN TOWN | ANNUAL REVIEW 01 Harlow and Gilston was designated as a Garden Town by the Ministry for Homes, Communities and Local Government in January 2017 and provides one of the most exciting growth opportunities of any place in the UK. It will comprise new and existing communities in and around Harlow. Set in attractive countryside, with transformative investment in transport and community infrastructure, new neighbourhoods to the east, west and south and new villages to the north will be established over the next 15 years and beyond. Strong foundations have been established for the success of the Garden Town with a shared, robust vision and strong leadership. Cambridge HARLOW & GILSTON GARDEN TOWN | ANNUAL REVIEW 02 S U F F O L K Bedford The Garden Town sits in the heartRoyston of the UK Innovation Corridor Sudbury Milton M11 Ipswich Keynes Letchworth Garden City Hitchin Buntingford M1 Stansted Airport Stevenage Colchester Luton Braintree Bishop’s Stortford A120 A1(M) E S S E X The Garden Ware H E R T F O R D S H I R E Town Welwyn Garden City Hatfield Hemel St Albans Hempstead Broxbourne Chelmsford Epping Potters Bar Chipping Ongor Loughton Watford Enfield M25 Brentwood L O N D O N Basildon HARLOW & GILSTON GARDEN TOWN | ANNUAL REVIEW 03 The Garden Town will unify town and rural areas with well-integrated, carefully considered, green and open spaces that provide opportunities for people of all ages GILSTON VILLAGES to come together in a safe and healthy environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Stort Crossing / Northern Bypass Initial
    EB1411 West Essex & East Hertfordshire Local Plans Modelling Essex County Council Technical Note 3 Stort Crossing/Northern Bypass Initial Testing (May 2016) 22 March 2017 St ort Crossing/N orther n B ypass Ini tial T esti ng Essex County Council EB1411 Harlow Local Plan Modelling Technical Note 3: Stort Crossing / Northern Bypass Initial Testing (May 2016) Project No: B3553R0U Document Title: Technical Note 3: Stort Crossing/Northern Bypass Initial Testing (May 2016) Document No.: 3 Revision: 4 Date: 22 March 2017 Client Name: Essex County Council Project Manager: Chris Hook Authors: Wendy Rathbone and Martin Whittles File Name: \\uk-lon-FAS02\Projects\UNIF\Projects\B3553R0U Harlow Local Plan Modelling\Reports and Technical Notes\Forecast Technical Notes\TN3\2017-03 WEEH TN3 issue v2.docx Jacobs U.K. Limited New City Court 20 St Thomas Street London SE1 9RS United Kingdom T +44 (0)20 7939 6100 F +44 (0)20 7939 6103 www.jacobs.com © Copyright 2017 Jacobs U.K. Limited. The concepts and information contained in this document are the property of Jacobs. Use or copying of this document in whole or in part without the written permission of Jacobs constitutes an infringement of copyright. Document history and status Revision Date Description By Review Approved 1 17/02/2017 Initial draft version WR MW MW 2 14/03/2017 Draft version MW WR 3 17/03/2017 Following MY & CH review MW MY/WR CH/MW 4 22/03/2017 Final issue MW MY/WR CH/MW EB1411 Limitation Statement This report has been prepared on behalf of, and for the exclusive use of, Essex County Council by Jacobs and is subject to, and issued in accordance with, the provisions of the contract between Jacobs and Essex County Council.
    [Show full text]