DOCSLIB.ORG

The 'A' Frequency Weighting

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The 'A' Frequency Weighting The ‘A’ Frequency Weighting Ken Scannell Non-refereed Noise and Sound Services, Spectrum House, 1 Elegans Avenue, St Ives NSW 2075 Previously published as part of an Acoustics Forum in Acoustics Australia, Vol 31 No 1, April 2003, aimed at promoting discussion. Reprinted with permission. Introduction Generally, the low frequency bass Figure 1, this appro.imately follo s tones (i.e. 50 to 250 Hz) sound the inverted Fletcher and Munson The ‘A’ frequency weighting is used slightly quieter than the tones in 40-phon curve 6_ 3 dB7. The 40- extensively in many acoustical the mid-audio frequency range 6i.e. phon curve is based on the noise measurements. Although 1 to 4 k9I7. E.periments ere subJectively reported equal almost exclusively used, it is often carried out by 9arvey Fletcher Z1[ loudness magnitudes at various misunderstood or incorrectly at the Bell Telephone Laboratories frequencies relative to 40 dB at 1 defined even by those who would in Ne Nork, in the early 1E30s to k9I. be expected to have a better determine ho loud tones of knowledge. It is commonly stated different frequencies sounded The symbol for the >A0 frequency in glossaries, even in official subJectively. A series of curves on a eighted sound pressure level, documents or textbooks on graph ere dra n from these measured in decibels is >L PA 0 Z3[ acoustics or noise, as “a scale that e.perimental results. These become although the common abbreviation simulates the response of the flatter in frequency ith higher is dBA or dB6A7. Either of the t o abbreviations could be used but the symbol is preferred as this places the >A0 ith the level and not ith the decibel, hich incorrectly implies there are different types of decibels. 7imit tions of 1A2 .eighting Cue to its simplicity and convenience, the >A0 frequency eighting has become popular and it is an often-used frequency eighting for many different noise sources. It is used for all types of noise assessments from Figure 1. The ‘A2 4eighted fre3uency filter rel tive to occupational noise, building 0 d, at 1 k9B. acoustics, loudness assessments and noise annoyance assessments. human ear” or similar erroneous sound pressure levels and are The World 9ealth ,rganiIation nonsense. kno n as equal loudness contours. 6W9,7 Z4[ has recognised that the From these contours, three curves >A0 frequency eighting is an kno n as A, B, and C frequency overall value hich may simulate Origins of the A- eightings ere developed for use neither the spectral selectivity of .eighting curve in sound level meters. These human hearing nor its non-linear frequency eightings ere specified relation to sound intensity. Quite The human hearing system is not in an American Standard for rong and totally misleading as sensitive to all sounds if they sound level meters in 1E36 Z2[. The statements in glossaries are vary in pitch or frequency. >A0 frequency eighting is sho n in NEW ZEALAND ACOUSTICS Vol. 16, No. 2 19 commonly given for the >A0 normal ear ere desired". first impressions but can vary by up frequency eighting such as “The to 11 dB in the lo frequency 6e.g. >A0 frequency eighting adJusts the The equal loudness contours ere 100 9I7 range. noise level to the subJective re-determined under more response of the Even if the >A0 human ear" or frequency reference is made eighting could to >A- eighted be used as a good decibels0, hich, universal of course do not predictor of e.ist and should loudness it is not be e.pressed as >A0 a good predictor frequency of noise eighted sound annoyance, levels in decibels. particularly for sounds hich Fletcher and differ from those Munson derived hich are the original equal medium level, loudness curves broadband mid- using only eleven audio frequency, observers ho and have constant listened to pure Figure 2. The ‘A2 Fre3uency 4eighting and the E3u l temporal tones through 7oudness Contours from Fletcher and Munson and characteristics. headphones. In their paper Robinson and D dson. It is often stated Fletcher and Munson 61E337 stated stringent conditions in 1E55 using that the >A0 frequency eighting “ait ould be necessary to increase ninety subJects. The re-determined follo s the 40-phon equal loudness the siIe of the group if values more equal loudness contour curves are contour. The confusion comes representative of the average similar to the original curves on from the fact that there are t o sets NOISE CONTROL SERVICES ACOUSTIC PRODUCTS AND DESIGN • Products for industrial and commercial noise control • Acoustic design • Turn-/ey acoustic solutions PO Box 82 126, Highland Park 6 Canon Place, Pakuranga AUCKLAND Phone: +64 9 576 4319 Fax: +64 9 576 3806 E-MailA peterCnoisecontrol.co.nD 20 Vol. 16, No. 2 NEW ZEALAND ACOUSTICS of equal loudness contours R one level can be realised by considering risk of occupational hearing from Fletcher and Munson and the simple case of a >dripping tap0 damage and the A0 frequency another from Aobinson and noise hen trying to sleep. eighted e.posure to noise. It is Cadson 61E567 Z5[. The >A0 ho ever not a good frequency eighting frequency filter is close The >A0 frequency eighting eighting to use hen assessing to the Fletcher and Munson 40- should be used for occupational annoyance from noise hich is phon curve but varies by up to 8 noise assessments 6e.cept peak predominantly lo frequency 6i.e. dB at lo frequencies from the noise assessments7 because there belo about 250 9I7. >more representative0 Aobinson are >kno n0 relationships bet een and Cadson 40-phon curve. This is the statistical risks of hearing a significant difference as it damage and the overall long term References represents close to a 50O change in >A0 frequency eighted noise the perception of subJective e.posure level Z7[. 9. Fletcher and 4.A. Munson , loudness. The t o 40-phon curves, “LoudnessL it0s definition, at the lo frequency end of the The >A0 frequency eighting has, measurement and calculation", J. spectrum are compared to the >A0 unfortunately, never been changed Acoust. Soc. Am. 5, 82-105 61E337. frequency eighting in Figure 2. from the 1E36 American Standard even though it as based on results Americ n St nd rd ASA Many noise sources in the here Fletcher and Munson D24.2. American National environment are lo frequency. indicated that they ere not Standard for Sound Level Meters When assessing these noise sources necessarily representative of the 61E367. the >A0 eighting frequency filter average normal ear. This as later can be regarded as a high-pass filter proved to be the case by Aobinson Austr li n St nd rd, Acoustics ith a cut-off frequency 610 dB and Cadson. 9ence the >A0 – Description and do n point7 at about 250 9I. frequency eighting is not even a 9ence, here a noise source is rough appro.imation 6i.e. about Me surement of dominated by lo frequency, the 50O error7 to the response of the Environment l Noise Part 1L use of the >A0 frequency eighting human ear at 40-phon. General Procedures 61EE77. gives a poor indication of loudness and an abysmal indication of noise ,. Berglund, T. Lindv ll H D. annoyance. Summ ry nd 9. Sch.el 6Eds7 Guidelines for Community Noise World 9ealth Annoyance is multi-dimensional, in Conclusions ,rganisation, Geneva, httpL// . ho.int/peh/noise/ fact, at lo sound pressure levels The >A0 frequency eighting is not guidelines2.html 62002.7 the character of the noise 6e.g. a scale, it cannot be used to temporal structure and frequency >establish a human dose response content7 can become, by far, the relationship0 and it does not 8. 4. Robinson, & R. S dominant factor in the annoyance simulate the response of the 8 dson , “A re-determination of perception. This as clearly sho n human ear. The >A- eighting0 the equal-loudness relations for in research carried out by Scannell should al ays be described in a pure tones", Brit. J. Appl. Phys. 7, Z6[ here subJects compared a lo glossary as the >A0 frequency 166-181 61E567. frequency repetitive impulse noise eighting to distinguish it from a to pink noise for both loudness time eighting. The >A0 frequency G. Sc nnell , “9uman response to and annoyance. 9ere a character eighting must be used for a lo frequency, repetitive impulse correction of up to 15 dB as occupational noise assessments but noise", J. Lo Freq. Noise and found to be required here audible should be utiliIed ith e.treme Mibr. 8647, 122-12E 61E8E7. sounds ere at a very lo sound care hen an indication of pressure level but ere unpleasant loudness or noise annoyance is Austr li nANe. Ze l nd in character. required. St nd rd ‘Occup tion l noise m n gement2 Part 4L Auditory Scannell found that for annoyance, A possible improved description of assessment, AS/N;S 126E.4 any penalty added to the obJective the >A0 frequency eighting isL the 61EE87. o measurement for a source ith >A0 frequency eighting is used as a unpleasant character must be level rudimentary appro.imation to the dependant ith a higher penalty subJective human perception of for lo er sound pressure levels. loudness at lo sound pressure The fact that character is more levels. There is a kno n important than the sound pressure relationship bet een the statistical NEW ZEALAND ACOUSTICS Vol. 16, No. 2 21 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • NOISE-CON 2004 the Impact of A-Weighting Sound Pressure Level
    Baltimore, Maryland NOISE-CON 2004 2004 July 12-14 The Impact of A-weighting Sound Pressure Level Measurements during the Evaluation of Noise Exposure Richard L. St. Pierre, Jr. RSP Acoustics Westminster, CO 80021 Daniel J. Maguire Cooper Standard Automotive Auburn, IN 46701 ABSTRACT Over the past 50 years, the A-weighted sound pressure level (dBA) has become the predominant measurement used in noise analysis. This is in spite of the fact that many studies have shown that the use of the A-weighting curve underestimates the role low frequency noise plays in loudness, annoyance, and speech intelligibility. The intentional de-emphasizing of low frequency noise content by A-weighting in studies can also lead to a misjudgment of the exposure risk of some physical and psychological effects that have been associated with low frequency noise. As a result of this reliance on dBA measurements, there is a lack of importance placed on minimizing low frequency noise. A review of the history of weighting curves as well as research into the problems associated with dBA measurements will be presented. Also, research relating to the effects of low frequency noise, including increased fatigue, reduced memory efficiency and increased risk of high blood pressure and heart ailments, will be analyzed. The result will show a need to develop and utilize other measures of sound that more accurately represent the potential risk to humans. 1. INTRODUCTION Since the 1930’s, there have been large advances in the ability to measure sound and understand its effects on humans. Despite this, a vast majority of acoustical measurements done today still use the methods originally developed 70 years ago.
    [Show full text]
  • Decibels, Phons, and Sones
    Decibels, Phons, and Sones The rate at which sound energy reaches a Table 1: deciBel Ratings of Several Sounds given cross-sectional area is known as the Sound Source Intensity deciBel sound intensity. There is an abnormally Weakest Sound Heard 1 x 10-12 W/m2 0.0 large range of intensities over which Rustling Leaves 1 x 10-11 W/m2 10.0 humans can hear. Given the large range, it Quiet Library 1 x 10-9 W/m2 30.0 is common to express the sound intensity Average Home 1 x 10-7 W/m2 50.0 using a logarithmic scale known as the Normal Conversation 1 x 10-6 W/m2 60.0 decibel scale. By measuring the intensity -4 2 level of a given sound with a meter, the Phone Dial Tone 1 x 10 W/m 80.0 -3 2 deciBel rating can be determined. Truck Traffic 1 x 10 W/m 90.0 Intensity values and decibel ratings for Chainsaw, 1 m away 1 x 10-1 W/m2 110.0 several sound sources listed in Table 1. The decibel scale and the intensity values it is based on is an objective measure of a sound. While intensities and deciBels (dB) are measurable, the loudness of a sound is subjective. Sound loudness varies from person to person. Furthermore, sounds with equal intensities but different frequencies are perceived by the same person to have unequal loudness. For instance, a 60 dB sound with a frequency of 1000 Hz sounds louder than a 60 dB sound with a frequency of 500 Hz.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide for the Use of the International System of Units (SI)
    Guide for the Use of the International System of Units (SI) m kg s cd SI mol K A NIST Special Publication 811 2008 Edition Ambler Thompson and Barry N. Taylor NIST Special Publication 811 2008 Edition Guide for the Use of the International System of Units (SI) Ambler Thompson Technology Services and Barry N. Taylor Physics Laboratory National Institute of Standards and Technology Gaithersburg, MD 20899 (Supersedes NIST Special Publication 811, 1995 Edition, April 1995) March 2008 U.S. Department of Commerce Carlos M. Gutierrez, Secretary National Institute of Standards and Technology James M. Turner, Acting Director National Institute of Standards and Technology Special Publication 811, 2008 Edition (Supersedes NIST Special Publication 811, April 1995 Edition) Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol. Spec. Publ. 811, 2008 Ed., 85 pages (March 2008; 2nd printing November 2008) CODEN: NSPUE3 Note on 2nd printing: This 2nd printing dated November 2008 of NIST SP811 corrects a number of minor typographical errors present in the 1st printing dated March 2008. Guide for the Use of the International System of Units (SI) Preface The International System of Units, universally abbreviated SI (from the French Le Système International d’Unités), is the modern metric system of measurement. Long the dominant measurement system used in science, the SI is becoming the dominant measurement system used in international commerce. The Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act of August 1988 [Public Law (PL) 100-418] changed the name of the National Bureau of Standards (NBS) to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and gave to NIST the added task of helping U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Human Ear  Hearing, Sound Intensity and Loudness Levels
    UIUC Physics 406 Acoustical Physics of Music The Human Ear Hearing, Sound Intensity and Loudness Levels We’ve been discussing the generation of sounds, so now we’ll discuss the perception of sounds. Human Senses: The astounding ~ 4 billion year evolution of living organisms on this planet, from the earliest single-cell life form(s) to the present day, with our current abilities to hear / see / smell / taste / feel / etc. – all are the result of the evolutionary forces of nature associated with “survival of the fittest” – i.e. it is evolutionarily{very} beneficial for us to be able to hear/perceive the natural sounds that do exist in the environment – it helps us to locate/find food/keep from becoming food, etc., just as vision/sight enables us to perceive objects in our 3-D environment, the ability to move /locomote through the environment enhances our ability to find food/keep from becoming food; Our sense of balance, via a stereo-pair (!) of semi-circular canals (= inertial guidance system!) helps us respond to 3-D inertial forces (e.g. gravity) and maintain our balance/avoid injury, etc. Our sense of taste & smell warn us of things that are bad to eat and/or breathe… Human Perception of Sound: * The human ear responds to disturbances/temporal variations in pressure. Amazingly sensitive! It has more than 6 orders of magnitude in dynamic range of pressure sensitivity (12 orders of magnitude in sound intensity, I p2) and 3 orders of magnitude in frequency (20 Hz – 20 KHz)! * Existence of 2 ears (stereo!) greatly enhances 3-D localization of sounds, and also the determination of pitch (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • The Decibel Scale
    Projectile motion - 1 VCE Physics.com The decibel scale • Sound intensity • Sound level: The decibel scale • Sound level calculations • Some decibel measurements • Change in intensity • Human hearing • The Phon scale The decibel scale - 2 VCE Physics.com Sound intensity • The intensity of sound decreases with the square of the distance from the source. power P 2 Sound intensity = I = (unit =W /m ) A area 2 I r P 2 = 1 I = 2 4πr I1 r2 The decibel scale - 3 VCE Physics.com Sound intensity • eg a sound source emitting a power of 1 mW, when heard at a distance of 1 vs 2 m P 1×10−3W I = = = 8×10−5W /m2 A 4π 1m 2 ( ) P 1×10−3W I = = =2×10−5W /m2 A 4π (2m)2 The decibel scale - 4 VCE Physics.com Sound level: The decibel scale • The decibel scale is a relative scale, based upon the threshold of -12 2 hearing I0 = 10 W/m . • It is a logarithmic scale, an increase of 10 corresponds to 10 times the intensity. • 20dB = 102 times, 30dB = 103 times the intensity. I L =10log I 0 L −12 10 2 I =10 W /m I L =10log −12 10 The decibel scale - 5 VCE Physics.com Sound level calculations • eg A sound has the intensity of 10-4 W/m2. This is a sound level of I 10−4 L =10log =10log =10log108 = 80dB I 10−12 0 eg The intensity of a 45 dB sound is L 45 −12 −12 10 10 −7.5 −8 2 I =10 =10 =10 =3.2×10 W /m What is the intensity of 120 dB? L 120 −12 −12 I =1010 =10 10 =100 =1W /m2 The decibel scale - 6 VCE Physics.com Some decibel measurements Source Intensity (W/m2) Sound level (dB) Threshold of hearing 10-12 0 dB Soft whisper 10-10 20 dB Quiet conversation 10-8 40 dB Loud conversation 10-6 60 dB Highway traffic 10-4 80 dB Tractor engine 10-2 100 dB Threshold of pain (Rock concert) 10-0 (1) 120 dB Jet engine (less than 50 m away) 102 (100) 140 dB Rocket launch (less than 500 m away) 104 (10,000) 160 dB + • Damage to hearing is due to both the sound level & exposure time.
    [Show full text]
  • A-Weighting”: Is It the Metric You Think It Is?
    Proceedings of Acoustics 2013 – Victor Harbor 17-20 November 2013, Victor Harbor, Australia “A-Weighting”: Is it the metric you think it is? McMinn, Terrance Curtin University of Technology ABSTRACT It is the generally accepted view that the “A-Weighting” (dBA) curve mimics human hearing to measure relative loudness. However it is not widely appreciated that the “A-Weighting” curve lacks validity especially at low frequen- cies (below 100 Hz) and for sounds above 60 dB. Research in the field of equal loudness has progressed and re- defined the shape of the original 40 phon Munson and Fletcher equal loudness curves. Unfortunately, the “A-Weighting” curve has not been revised in the light of this research or ISO 226. This paper highlights some of the changes in the research and problems identified with “A-Weighting” as it has come into current usage. INTRODUCTION The published paper smoothed the data from a number of The A Weighting was introduced in sound level meters based tests and then curve fitted to produce the figures below. on the American Tentative Standards for Sound Level Meters There is no information in the paper identifying the method Z24.3-1936 for Measurement of Noise and Other Sounds or justification for extrapolation of the curves beyond the test (Cited in Pierre and Maguire 2004). This standard adopted frequency range. the 40 decibel loudness levels of Fletcher and Munson to establish the “Curve A” (A-Weighting) and 70 decibel for the “Curve B” (B-Weighting). However it should be recognized that over time the usage of the “A-Weighting” has changed from that intended in Z24.3-1936.
    [Show full text]
  • Loudness Level
    Loudness level This article was checked by pedagogue This article ws checked by pedagogue, but later was changed. Checked version of the article can be found here (http s://www.wikilectures.eu/index.php?title=Loudness_leve l&oldid=18545). See also comparation of actual and checked version (https:// www.wikilectures.eu/index.php?title=Loudness_level&diff= 21411&oldid=18545). This article was checked by pedagogue This article was checked by pedagogue, but later was changed. What is loudness? This article was checked by pedagogue This article was checked by pedagogue, but later was changed. Loudness is the certain criterion of a sound, which correlate with physical strength of sound(amplitude). Loudness also can scaling a sound, extending from quiet to loud. Sometimes, loudness is confused with other measures of sound strength, such as sound pressure, sound intensity and sound power. However, loudness is much more complex than other types of sound strength. Besides, loudness is also affected by additional parameters other than sound pressure, for example, frequency, bandwidth and duration. Unit of loudness(level) Characteristic of loudness can be shown by certain graph, equal loudness curve. Loudness(or loudness level) can be measured by the phon. Phon The phon is a unit of loudness level for pure tones. Its purpose is to compensate for the effect of frequency on the perceived loudness of tones. This unit was proposed by S. S. Stevens. By definition, the number of phon of a sound is the dB SPL of a sound at a frequency of 1 kHz that sounds just as loud. This implies that 0 phon is the limit of perception, and inaudible sounds have negative phon levels.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 1-2: Sound Pressure Level Scale
    Lecture 1-2: Sound Pressure Level Scale Overview 1. Psychology of Sound. We can define sound objectively in terms of its physical form as pressure variations in a medium such as air, or we can define it subjectively in terms of the sensations generated by our hearing mechanism. Of course the sensation we perceive from a sound is linked to the physical properties of the sound wave through our hearing mechanism, whereby some aspects of the pressure variations are converted into firings in the auditory nerve. The study of how the objective physical character of sound gives rise to subjective auditory sensation is called psychoacoustics. The three dimensions of our psychological sensation of sound are called Loudness , Pitch and Timbre . 2. How can we measure the quantity of sound? The amplitude of a sound is a measure of the average variation in pressure, measured in pascals (Pa). Since the mean amplitude of a sound is zero, we need to measure amplitude either as the distance between the most negative peak and the most positive peak or in terms of the root-mean-square ( rms ) amplitude (i.e. the square root of the average squared amplitude). The power of a sound source is a measure of how much energy it radiates per second in watts (W). It turns out that the power in a sound is proportional to the square of its amplitude. The intensity of a sound is a measure of how much power can be collected per unit area in watts per square metre (Wm -2). For a sound source of constant power radiating equally in all directions, the sound intensity must fall with the square of the distance to the source (since the radiated energy is spread out through the surface of a sphere centred on the source, and the surface area of the sphere increases with the square of its radius).
    [Show full text]
  • Sound Sense – by D. Lovegrove, S. Hough
    SOUND (QUALITY) SENSE Many of us would agree that there are a lot of things around us that are too noisy, such as the seats behind the engines on a long flight, an angry two-year-old and the volume of the music system in the car next to us at the stoplight, which shakes our seats. Sometimes, though, it’s not the loudest sounds that are the hardest to live with. It’s the intermittent hiss, or the whine perfectly pitched to set our teeth on edge. When a product or an appliance is manufactured, a vehicle, a toy, a train carriage, anything that people are going to hear or be near, it should sound “right”. Not just quiet enough to be unobjectionable - that’s necessary but not sufficient. It’s got to have that indefinable Sound of Quality, the sound you would wish your car door in closing would make. A truism of sound quality work is that a good lawnmower doesn’t sound like a good refrigerator. Companies who take this sort of thing seriously do jury testing. They may use listeners like their customers to get a better measure of public opinion, or listeners from among their engineers, to gain a better understanding of which elements of the product are making the most objectionable part of the noise. The jury ranks noises according to various rules. The 2 most successful forms of comparison are “Paired Comparison” and “Semantic Differential”. The use of a Fixed Scale (“On a scale of 1-10, how annoying is this noise?”) is generally not recommended.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sonification Handbook Chapter 3 Psychoacoustics
    The Sonification Handbook Edited by Thomas Hermann, Andy Hunt, John G. Neuhoff Logos Publishing House, Berlin, Germany ISBN 978-3-8325-2819-5 2011, 586 pages Online: http://sonification.de/handbook Order: http://www.logos-verlag.com Reference: Hermann, T., Hunt, A., Neuhoff, J. G., editors (2011). The Sonification Handbook. Logos Publishing House, Berlin, Germany. Chapter 3 Psychoacoustics Simon Carlile Reference: Carlile, S. (2011). Psychoacoustics. In Hermann, T., Hunt, A., Neuhoff, J. G., editors, The Sonification Handbook, chapter 3, pages 41–61. Logos Publishing House, Berlin, Germany. Media examples: http://sonification.de/handbook/chapters/chapter3 6 Chapter 3 Psychoacoustics Simon Carlile 3.1 Introduction Listening in the real world is generally a very complex task since sounds of interest typically occur on a background of other sounds that overlap in frequency and time. Some of these sounds can represent threats or opportunities while others are simply distracters or maskers. One approach to understanding how the auditory system makes sense of this complex acoustic world is to consider the nature of the sounds that convey high levels of information and how the auditory system has evolved to extract that information. From this evolutionary perspective, humans have largely inherited this biological system so it makes sense to consider how our auditory systems use these mechanisms to extract information that is meaningful to us and how that knowledge can be applied to best sonify various data. One biologically important feature of a sound is its identity; that is, the spectro-temporal characteristics of the sound that allow us to extract the relevant information represented by the sound.
    [Show full text]
  • FESI DOCUMENT A2 Basics of Acoustics
    FESI DOCUMENT A2 Basics of Acoustics September 2001, 3rd revised edition to be ordered: Thermal Insulation Contractors Association Mr. Ralph Bradley Tica House Allington Way Yarm Road Business Park Darlington DLI 4QB Tel : +44 (0) 1325 734140 direct Fax: +44 (0) 1325 466704 www.tica-acad.co.uk [email protected] Basics of Acoustics Contents A2-0 Intention .......................................................................................................................................2 A2-1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................2 A2-2 Classification................................................................................................................................3 A2-2.1 Sound Sensation .........................................................................................................................4 A2-2.2 Infrasonic, Audible and Ultrasonic Sound ...................................................................................6 A2-2.3 Airborne, Structureborne, Waterborne Sound.............................................................................7 A2-2.4 Acoustic Insulation and Sound Attenuation.................................................................................8 A2-3 Physical, technical basics............................................................................................................8 A2-3.1 Frequency, Speed of Sound, Wavelength...................................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • Psychoacoustics of Multichannel Audio
    THE PSYCHOACOUSTICS OF MULTICHANNEL AUDIO J. ROBERT STUART Meridian Audio Ltd Stonehill, Huntingdon, PE18 6ED England ABSTRACT This is a tutorial paper giving an introduction to the perception of multichannel sound reproduction. The important underlying psychoacoustic phenomena are reviewed – starting with the behaviour of the auditory periphery and moving on through binaural perception, central binaural phenomena and cognition. The author highlights the way the perception of a recording can be changed according to the number of replay channels used. The paper opens the question of relating perceptual and cognitive responses to directional sound or to sound fields. 1. INTRODUCTION 3.1 Pitch Multichannel systems are normally intended to present a The cochlea aids frequency selectivity by dispersing three-dimensional sound to the listener. In general, the excitation on the basilar membrane on a frequency- more loudspeakers that can be applied, the more accurately dependent basis. Exciting frequencies are mapped on a the sound field can be reproduced. Since all multichannel pitch scale roughly according to the dispersion (position) systems do not have a 1:1 relationship between transmitted and the integral of auditory filtering function. Several channels and loudspeaker feeds, a deep understanding of scales of pitch have been used; the most common being the human binaural system is necessary to avoid spatial, mel, bark and E.. Fig. 1 shows the inter-relationship loudness or timbral discrepancies. between these scales. This paper reviews some of the basic psychoacoustic The mel scale derives from subjective pitch testing and was mechanisms that are relevant to this topic. defined so that 1000mel º 1kHz.
    [Show full text]