DOCSLIB.ORG

Deliverable 2.4-1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Deliverable 2.4-1 SEVENTH FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME THEME [7] Theme Title: Transport (including Aeronautics) SuperGreen SUPPORTING EU‟S FREIGHT TRANSPORT LOGISTICS ACTION PLAN ON GREEN CORRIDORS ISSUES Grant agreement for: <Coordination and Support Actions (coordination)> Grant agreement no.: TREN/FP7TR/233573/‖SUPERGREEN‖ Deliverable D2.3 Effects of changes in operational and regulatory environment Due date of deliverable: 15 January 2011 Actual submission date: 22 February 2011 (Revised: 8 July 2011) Organisation name of lead partner for this deliverable: NTUA Document ID number: 02-30-RD-2011-01-01-4 SuperGreen – Deliverable D2.3 REVISIONS/DOCUMENT HISTORY: Index Date Authors Reviewers Subject 01 Feb.8, 2011 G. Panagakos, I. Ilves, P&G First incomplete draft NTUA A.M. Wahl, et al. MARINTEK 02 Feb.20, 2011 As above As above First complete draft 03 Feb.22, 2011 As above H. Psaraftis, Revision taking on board NTUA comments from internal reviewers 04 July 8, 2011 As above H. Psaraftis, Revision taking on board NTUA comments from Commission CLASSIFICATION AND APPROVAL Classification: R Confidential (CO) DEFINITION Nature of the deliverable: R = Report, P = Prototype, D = Demonstrator, O = Other Dissemination level: PU = Public PP = Restricted to other programme participants (including the Commission Services). RE = Restricted to a group specified by the consortium (including the Commission Services). CO = Confidential, only for members of the consortium (including the Commission Services). Confidential for the Duration of the Project: As for ‗Confidential‘, but only for the duration of the Project. After final Project Approval by the EC, status for reports classified ‗Confidential for the Duration of the Project‘ are automatically down-graded to ‗Public‘. Confidential: The document is for use of the beneficiaries within the SuperGreen Consortium, and shall not be used or disclosed to third parties without the unanimous agreement within the project General Assembly and subsequent EC approval since document classification is part of the EC Grant Agreement. Any executive summary specifically intended for publication may however be made known to the public by the author and/or the Coordinator. 02-30-RD-2011-01-01-4 2 SuperGreen – Deliverable D2.3 Document summary information Authors and contributors Initials Author Organisation Role GP George Panagakos NTUA Author SR Sanni Rönkkö SITO Author CG Chara Georgopoulou DNV Author MV Maro Varvate HSSA Author RK Recai Kiliç TCDD Author SC Stefanos Chadjinikolaou NTUA Contributor HP Harilaos Psaraftis NTUA Contributor IS Ilkka Salanne SITO Contributor KA Kenan Álká TCDD Contributor Revision history Rev. Who Date Comment 1-3 All Feb.20, 2011 Various revisions throughout document 4 HP July 8, 2011 Response to Commission‘s comments Quality Control Name Date Checked by WP leader Ilkka Salanne, SITO 22 February, 2011 Checked by internal reviewer Indrek Ilves, P&G 21 February, 2011 Checked by internal reviewer Aud Marit Wahl, MARINTEK 21 February, 2011 APPROVAL: All partners of the project consortium via a return email have approved the final version of this SuperGreen Deliverable. ACKNOWLEDGMENT Funding for the SuperGreen project has been provided by the European Commission (DG-MOVE) and by partners‘ own funds, in the context of Grant Agreement No. TREN/FP7TR/233573/‖SUPERGREEN‖. DISCLAIMER Use of any knowledge, information or data contained in this document shall be at the user's sole risk. Neither the SuperGreen Consortium nor any of its members, their officers, employees or agents accept shall be liable or responsible, in negligence or otherwise, for any loss, damage or expense whatever sustained by any person as a result of the use, in any manner or form, of any knowledge, information or data contained in this document, or due to any inaccuracy, omission or error therein contained. The European Commission shall not in any way be liable or responsible for the use of any such knowledge, information or data, or of the consequences thereof. 02-30-RD-2011-01-01-4 3 SuperGreen – Deliverable D2.3 Table of contents LIST OF FIGURES ......................................................................................................................................... 7 LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................................................... 8 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ......................................................................................................................... 9 0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................. 11 1 INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES ............................................................................................. 13 2 THE METHODOLOGY ...................................................................................................................... 15 3 BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT ............................................................................................................. 19 3.1 DEMOGRAPHIC CHANGES ................................................................................................................ 19 3.2 URBANISATION AND CITY SPRAWL ................................................................................................. 21 3.3 INCREASING INDIVIDUALISATION AND PROLIFERATION OF ELECTRONIC BUSINESS ......................... 21 3.4 INCREASING ECONOMIC ACTIVITY .................................................................................................. 22 3.5 GLOBALISATION AND TECHNOLOGICAL CONVERGENCE ................................................................. 22 3.6 EU ENLARGEMENT AND INTEGRATION ........................................................................................... 23 3.7 INCREASING SCARCITY OF FOSSIL FUELS ......................................................................................... 23 3.8 INCREASING SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSCIOUSNESS ......................................................... 24 4 TRENDS IN LOGISTICS .................................................................................................................... 25 4.1 RELOCATION OF PRODUCTION AND WIDER SOURCING AND DISTRIBUTION ...................................... 25 4.2 SUPPLY CHAIN INTEGRATION AND INFORMATION SHARING ............................................................ 25 4.3 IMPROVING RESPONSIVENESS TO CUSTOMER REQUIREMENTS AND DIRECT DELIVERIES .................. 27 4.4 INCREASING TRANSPORT EMISSIONS ............................................................................................... 28 4.5 REVERSE LOGISTICS ........................................................................................................................ 28 4.6 CONTAINERISATION AND HUB & SPOKE SYSTEM............................................................................. 28 5 PUBLIC POLICIES ............................................................................................................................. 30 5.1 LIBERALISE TRANSPORT OPERATIONS ............................................................................................. 30 5.2 INTERNALISE EXTERNAL COSTS ...................................................................................................... 33 5.3 SET ENERGY CONSUMPTION/EMISSION/NOISE STANDARDS & OTHER REGULATORY MEASURES ...... 34 5.4 TIGHTEN UP AND HARMONISE SAFETY STANDARDS ........................................................................ 34 5.5 TIGHTEN UP SECURITY STANDARDS ................................................................................................ 35 5.6 STANDARDISE TRANSPORT UNITS AND VEHICLES............................................................................ 35 5.7 HARMONISE INFRASTRUCTURE (INTEROPERABILITY) ..................................................................... 36 5.8 HARMONISE RULES AND ENFORCEMENT ......................................................................................... 36 5.9 STANDARDISE LIABILITY AND DOCUMENTATION FOR MULTIMODAL TRANSPORT ........................... 37 5.10 SIMPLIFY ADMINISTRATION ............................................................................................................ 37 5.11 CREATE FREIGHT-ORIENTED CORRIDORS ........................................................................................ 38 5.12 DEVELOP GREEN CORRIDORS .......................................................................................................... 40 5.13 EMPLOY A SPECTRUM OF INSTRUMENTS TO FUND INFRASTRUCTURE AND OTHER ACTIONS ............ 40 02-30-RD-2011-01-01-4 4 SuperGreen – Deliverable D2.3 5.14 BRING ICT APPLICATIONS TO MARKET (ITS, ERTMS, RIS, E-MARITIME, E-FREIGHT, E-CUSTOMS) 42 5.15 ENHANCE EDUCATION AND TRAINING............................................................................................. 43 5.16 ENSURE SATISFACTORY WORKING CONDITIONS .............................................................................. 43 5.17 SUPPORT RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT ........................................................................................... 43 5.18 EDUCATE, INFORM AND INVOLVE THE GREATER PUBLIC IN TRANSPORT POLICIES ........................... 44 5.19 MONITOR AND PUBLISH SERVICE QUALITY INDICATORS ................................................................. 45 5.20 PROMOTE INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION WITH EU NEIGHBOURING COUNTRIES ........................... 45 5.21 GREEN PUBLIC PROCUREMENT
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Promoting Intermodality in the Alps.Pdf
    Promoting Intermodality in the Alps Preliminary Conclusions of the Work Initiated Since the Conference of Regensburg At the Regensburg Conference the ministers instructed the Steering Committee to directly follow the progress of the measures that have been initiated to promote alternatives to road transport in the Alps and to advance intermodal freight traffic. These measures combine the optimisation of existing railway lines, the realisation of new, more suitable possibilities of crossing the Alps by rail and the establishment of specific financing mechanisms to take account of the considerable public investments. These political measures are being developed in particular within the framework of the European Union’s Trans-European Network Programme and the agreements between the EU and Switzerland regarding land-based transport. The expected modal transfer does not have the same weight for the various Alpine countries: While in Switzerland only 37% of freight transports are carried by road, the figure for Austria is 69% and for the French-Italian crossings 83%. The scale of the challenge is therefore not the same. Optimisation of Major, Cross-Border Railway Lines The forecasts for new, transalpine railway infrastructures up to 2022 cannot suffice to meet the goals of intermodality. Firstly, because the quality of the infrastructures must be supported by at least a corresponding quality of railway services, and also because all continuing damage to existing lines by the tracks endangers the subsequent balance of these investments. However, the major Alpine crossings support trade routes on a European scale. The improvement of services on each corridor and the progress of network interoperability must be agreed between several countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Railway Liberalisation Is Bearing Fruit
    editorial About managing risk solutions for intermodal logistics www.hupac.ch July 2006 What to do, when something suddenly no longer works? The closure of the Gotthard motor- way in June 2006 revealed a divided transport market. On one Railway liberalisation is bearing fruit side were companies already set up for rail transport. On The Swiss Hupac Ltd – European market leader in combined transport through Switzerland – is making the other side were hauliers successful use of the liberalisation of the railways. On the occasion of the General Meeting on 12.5.2006 entirely dependent on roads. While the former shifted their in Lugano, Board Chairman Hans-Jörg Bertschi named competition in railway freight transport through in-house modal split in favour Switzerland as the main reason for Hupac’s traffic growth. of rail during the closure of the Gotthard motorway, the latter Last year Hupac shifted 520,000 had no alternative to the traffic road consignments to the railways. jams. Hupac’s unaccompanied This represents an increase of intermodal transport had suffi- 15.9% compared to the previous cient capacity available. Anyone year. The strong growth has contrib- who had suitable equipment uted to a break in the trend: Since could switch over to rail without 2000 the number of lorries involved any problems. There was less in transalpine transport has fallen on offer on the Rolling Highway (-14%), while combined transport at the Gotthard. Only a limited on the railways has been increasing amount of rolling stock is avail- in volume (+50%). Political means able. Space on night trains was of controlling transport such as the in strong demand, and was Swiss Heavy Vehicles Fee (LSVA) therefore rapidly allocated, while and the 40 tons limit are reasons for there was limited demand for the this.
    [Show full text]
  • 131121311 14132 Have a Safe Trip!
    31112121221313112131114132 HAVE A SAFE TRIP! A GOOD MOVE EVER WONDERED HOW TO GET A TRUCK ACROSS SWITZERLAND STRESS-FREE? RALPIN AG OFFERS A ROLLING HIGHWAY SOLUTION FOR YOUR ALPINE TRANSIT REQUIREMENTS. RAlpin’s “Rola” rolling highway involves loading entire heavy haulage company’s dispatch schedule warrants it. One of the goods vehicles (articulated and non-articulated trucks and principle advantages of the rolling highway is that it is trailers) onto low-floor wagon trains at special terminals; the designed to optimise the customer’s benefits: by matching truck drivers travel in an accompanying sleeping car. RAlpin journey times with the statutory rest periods for drivers, has been operating a rolling highway between Freiburg the latter are able to take to the wheels of their trucks the im Breisgau, Germany and Novara, Italy since 2001. The route moment they arrive at the receiving terminal. represents an economical and environmentally responsible solution for crossing Switzerland and its Alps by offering safe Moreover, the rolling highway means trucks can transit the and cost-effective travel during the day and at night. Alps despite Switzerland’s ban on commercial vehicle move- ments at night and on Sundays – around the clock, throughout The rolling highway is an integral part of Switzerland’s transit the year and in both directions. A further advantage is that the traffic policies and supplements the unaccompanied combined relation is free from time-consuming customs procedures at transport (UCT) sector. It offers a viable alternative to UCT the borders for vehicles transiting through Switzerland from wherever the freight situation, the vehicle fleet and the an EU country to an EU country.
    [Show full text]
  • Investing in Mobility
    Investing in Mobility FREIGHT TRANSPORT IN THE HUDSON REGION THE EAST OF HUDSON RAIL FREIGHT OPERATIONS TASK FORCE Investing in Mobility FREIGHT TRANSPORT IN THE HUDSON REGION Environmental Defense and the East of Hudson Rail Freight Operations Task Force On the cover Left:Trucks exacerbate crippling congestion on the Cross-Bronx Expressway (photo by Adam Gitlin). Top right: A CSX Q116-23 intermodal train hauls double-stack containers in western New York. (photo by J. Henry Priebe Jr.). Bottom right: A New York Cross Harbor Railroad “piggypacker” transfers a low-profile container from rail to a trailer (photo by Adam Gitlin). Environmental Defense is dedicated to protecting the environmental rights of all people, including the right to clean air, clean water, healthy food and flourishing ecosystems. Guided by science, we work to create practical solutions that win lasting political, economic and social support because they are nonpartisan, cost-effective and fair. The East of Hudson Rail Freight Operations Task Force is committed to the restoration of price- and service-competitive freight rail service in the areas of the New York metropolitan region east of the Hudson River. The Task Force seeks to accomplish this objective through bringing together elected officials, carriers and public agencies at regularly scheduled meetings where any issue that hinders or can assist in the restoration of competitive rail service is discussed openly. It is expected that all participants will work toward the common goal of restoring competitive rail freight service East of the Hudson. ©2004 Environmental Defense Printed on 100% (50% post-consumer) recycled paper, 100% chlorine free.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Combined Transport Terminal Operations Identification of Measures to Improve Terminals in BSR
    RAPORT Analysis of combined transport terminal operations Identification of measures to improve terminals in BSR Activity: WP 3, Activity 1 Version: Final Date: 06/03/2020 Bogusz Wiśnicki City of Bydgoszcz CONTENTS Introduction.............................................................................................................................................. 3 1. Classification of combined transport terminals ............................................................................... 4 1.1. Types and categories of terminals .......................................................................................... 4 1.2. Representative terminal models.............................................................................................. 9 2. Infrastructure of combined transport terminals ............................................................................. 11 2.1. Elements of infrastructure of combined transport terminals ................................................. 11 2.2. Large rail-road terminal ......................................................................................................... 12 2.3. Small rail-road terminal ......................................................................................................... 14 2.4. Trimodal river terminal .......................................................................................................... 16 2.5. Border terminal .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Increasing Capacity Utilization of Shuttle Trains in Intermodal Transport by Investing in Transshipment Technologies for Non- Cranable Semi-Trailers
    Proceedings of the 2016 Winter Simulation Conference T. M. K. Roeder, P. I. Frazier, R. Szechtman, E. Zhou, T. Huschka, and S. E. Chick, eds. INCREASING CAPACITY UTILIZATION OF SHUTTLE TRAINS IN INTERMODAL TRANSPORT BY INVESTING IN TRANSSHIPMENT TECHNOLOGIES FOR NON- CRANABLE SEMI-TRAILERS Ralf Elbert Daniel Reinhardt Chair of Management and Logistics Technische Universität Darmstadt Hochschulstraße 1 Darmstadt, D-64289 Darmstadt, GERMANY ABSTRACT For shuttle trains with a fixed transport capacity which are the dominant operating form in intermodal transport, increasing capacity utilization is of crucial importance due to the low marginal costs of transporting an additional loading unit. Hence, offering rail-based transport services for non-cranable semi-trailers can result in additional earnings for railway companies. However, these earnings have to compensate for the investment costs of the technology. Based on a dynamic investment calculation, this paper presents a simulation model to evaluate the economic profitability of transshipment technologies for non-cranable semi-trailers from the railway company’s perspective. The results depend on the capacity utilization risk faced by the railway company. In particular, if the railway company does not sell all the train capacity to freight forwarders or intermodal operators on a long-term basis, investing in technology for the transshipment of non-cranable semi-trailers can be economically profitable. 1 INTRODUCTION Freight volume is predicted to increase in the years to come and the majority of this growth is expected to even increase the road freight transport volume. According to forecasts the total road freight transport volume in the European Union will grow to 2442 billion ton kilometers (tkm) in 2030 which is an increase of 43% compared to 2005 (Rich and Hansen 2009).
    [Show full text]
  • Deflection Estimation of Edge Supported Reinforced Concrete
    STATUS OF RAILWAY TRACKS AND ROLLING STOCKS IN BANGLADESH Md. Tareq Yasin DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING BANGLADESH UNIVERSITY OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY May, 2010 STATUS OF RAILWAY TRACKS AND ROLLING STOCKS IN BANGLADESH by Md. Tareq Yasin MASTER OF ENGINEERING IN CIVIL ENGINEERING (Transportation) Department of Civil Engineering BANGLADESH UNIVERSITY OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, DHAKA 2010 ii The thesis titled “STATUS OF RAILWAY TRACKS AND ROLLING STOCKS IN BANGLADESH”, Submitted by Md. Tareq Yasin, Roll No: 100504413F, Session: October-2005, has been accepted as satisfactory in partial fulfilment of the requirement for the degree of Master of Engineering in Civil Engineering (Transportation). BOARD OF EXAMINERS 1. __________________________ Dr. Hasib Mohammed Ahsan Chairman Professor (Supervisor) Department of Civil Engineering BUET, Dhaka-1000 2. __________________________ Dr. Md. Zoynul Abedin Member Professor & Head Department of Civil Engineering BUET, Dhaka-1000 3. __________________________ Dr. Md. Mizanur Rahman Member Associate Professor Department of Civil Engineering BUET, Dhaka-1000 iii CANDIDATE’S DECLARATION It is hereby declared that this project or any part of it has not been submitted elsewhere for the award of any degree or diploma. ____________________ (Md. Tareq Yasin) iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First of all, the author wishes to convey his profound gratitude to Almighty Allah for giving him this opportunity and for enabling him to complete the project successfully. This project paper is an accumulation of many people’s endeavor. For this, the author is acknowledged to a number of people who helped to prepare this and for their kind advices, suggestions, directions, and cooperation and proper guidelines for this. The author wishes to express his heartiest gratitude and profound indebtedness to his supervisor Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Data Base and Comparative Analysis of CT and Transhipment Technologies for CT
    Data base and comparative analysis of CT and transhipment technologies for CT Deliverable D.T.1.2.1. 1 Document Title: Data base and comparative analysis of CT and transhipment technolo- Sub Title: gies for CT Document Version Comments Date Done by History Draft prefilled Template on CT Transhipment 18/4/2017 UM concept Technologies (OBB) Version 01 Draft version 1 with comparative analyses 27/11/2017 SSP (OBB) ITTL Inputs on CT processes , supply chain and Ter- 23/1/2018 LKZ(AKL) minal Villach Design and added pictures 30/1/2018 SSP(OBB) LCA (AKL) Version 2 Additional inputs and comments from partners 20/2/2018 ZAILOG SGKV (BHG) TX EURAC Finalisation 14/3/2018 SSP (OBB) UM Number of pages: 114 Number of annexes: 1 Prepared by: University of Maribor, SSP Consult principal Author(s): Mitja Klemenčič Robert Burg Contribution: AKL; ITTL; LCA, LKZ, EURAC, SGKV, BHG, ZAI- Contributing Author(s):Stane Božičnik LOG, BMVIT Roberto Federico Sebastian Ruckes Alberto Milotti Vlasta Rodošek Tomislav Letnik Katja Hanžič Mateja Matajič Klemen Gostič Juergen Neugebauer Peer Review Partner Date UM 18.3.2018 Approval for delivery AlpinnoCT Coordinator Date SSP Consult for StMB 30.03.2018 2 Content Summary .................................................................................................................................... 9 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 16 2 CT Processes and supply chain in CT ................................................................................. 17 2.1 General description of CT processes for the first mile, long haul and last mile ....... 22 2.1.1 Maritime Combined Transport: First mile/pre-haul .......................................... 22 2.1.2 Continental Combined Transport: First mile ...................................................... 24 2.1.3 Description of CT processes for the long haul ..................................................
    [Show full text]
  • {TEXTBOOK} Trains! Pdf Free Download
    TRAINS! PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Susan E Goodman | 48 pages | 27 Mar 2012 | Random House USA Inc | 9780375869419 | English | New York, United States Train - Wikipedia From expert analysis of the latest news to in-depth stories on railroading's rich history. Trains has it all. Garden Railways magazine — G and large scale. Garden Railways has been the leading magazine devoted to the hobby of outdoor, large-scale model railroading for more than 25 years. Classic Trains magazine — the golden years. Classic Trains is a quarterly magazine celebrating the "golden years of railroading. The 1 online destination for train enthusiasts. Welcome to the online home of Kalmbach Publishing's five railroading-related magazines. Whether you're here to read the latest railroad news or to explore the hobby of model trains, we have something for every rail enthusiast. Here you can browse our sites, sign up for free newsletters, and more! To view a video introduction to model trains with actor Michael Gross, click here. Newsletter Sign-Up. By signing up you may also receive occasional reader surveys and special offers from Trains magazine. Please view our privacy policy. Trains announces launch of Trains. Wheel Rail Interaction Conference. Presented by Trains Magazine. Steam Over Cumbres. CSX at Turbine Power. Real Stories of the Rails. Oxford Diecast. USA Trains. Central Valley. Deluxe Innovations. Pacific Fast Mail. Penn Line. Woodland Scenics. Christmas Train Set. Ls Models. Train Layout. Electric Train Set. Marx Train Accessories. Brand see all. Year see all. Material see all. Cast Iron. Pressed Steel. Grading see all. C Mint-Brand New.
    [Show full text]
  • Requirements Toward the Freight System of 2030-2050 (Final) Submission Date: 24/02/2017 Deliverable 21.2
    D3.1.1 – Review of existing practices to improve CAPACITY4RAIL capacity on the European rail network SCP3-GA-2013-605650 Requirements toward the freight system of 2030-2050 (Final) Submission date: 24/02/2017 Deliverable 21.2 D21.2 – Requirement s toward the freight system of 2030 - CAPACITY4RAIL 2050 (Final) SCP3-GA-2013-605650 Lead contractor for this deliverable: • KTH Project coordinator • International Union of Railways, UIC CAPACITY4RAIL PUBLIC Page 2 D21.2. - Requirements toward the freight system of CAPACITY4RAIL 2030/2050 (Final) SCP3-GA-2013-605650 Executive Summary The total demand for freight in Europe has increased rapidly in recent decades, but rail freight has lost market share and most of the increase has been handled by trucks. In the last decade, rail markets share has increased in some countries because of deregulation, investments in rail and truck fees, but is still very low in many countries. In the new member states the markets have decreased rapidly when rail monopoly has been taken away. Rail deregulation has not been implemented in practice in all countries while at the same time truck deregulation has been implemented fully and resulted in a low-cost truck market. Moreover, the cost of external effects has not yet been implemented. Most forecasts show an increase of 60% in total freight demand by 2050 and an approximately constant market share with a business-as-usual scenario. To fulfil the targets in the EU white paper, it is necessary to roughly double rails’ market share from 18% in 2011 to at least 36% in 2050. This means that the tonne-kilometres will be 3.6 times as much as today and 2.4 times as much as in a business- as-usual scenario in 2050.
    [Show full text]
  • Finished Vehicle Logistics by Rail in Europe
    Finished Vehicle Logistics by Rail in Europe Version 3 December 2017 This publication was prepared by Oleh Shchuryk, Research & Projects Manager, ECG – the Association of European Vehicle Logistics. Foreword The project to produce this book on ‘Finished Vehicle Logistics by Rail in Europe’ was initiated during the ECG Land Transport Working Group meeting in January 2014, Frankfurt am Main. Initially, it was suggested by the members of the group that Oleh Shchuryk prepares a short briefing paper about the current status quo of rail transport and FVLs by rail in Europe. It was to be a concise document explaining the complex nature of rail, its difficulties and challenges, main players, and their roles and responsibilities to be used by ECG’s members. However, it rapidly grew way beyond these simple objectives as you will see. The first draft of the project was presented at the following Land Transport WG meeting which took place in May 2014, Frankfurt am Main. It received further support from the group and in order to gain more knowledge on specific rail technical issues it was decided that ECG should organise site visits with rail technical experts of ECG member companies at their railway operations sites. These were held with DB Schenker Rail Automotive in Frankfurt am Main, BLG Automotive in Bremerhaven, ARS Altmann in Wolnzach, and STVA in Valenton and Paris. As a result of these collaborations, and continuous research on various rail issues, the document was extensively enlarged. The document consists of several parts, namely a historical section that covers railway development in Europe and specific EU countries; a technical section that discusses the different technical issues of the railway (gauges, electrification, controlling and signalling systems, etc.); a section on the liberalisation process in Europe; a section on the key rail players, and a section on logistics services provided by rail.
    [Show full text]
  • The Alpine Rolling Highway
    Interview with Ludwig Näf, CEO of RAlpin AG The Alpine rolling highway The Swiss government has passed laws to protect the majestic beauty of the Swiss Alps and supports RAlpin’s rolling highway through government subsidies Switzerland’s position as a transit country on the important north-south trade axis through Europe places a heavy burden on its road transport infrastructure. An astonishing 600,000 heavy goods vehicles pass through the Alpine Republic each year. In the mid-1990s, efforts to shift the passage of goods through the Alps away from the roads and onto other modes of transport were enshrined in legislation. 35 years later, RAlpin AG ensures that one in six of these trucks crosses Switzerland without using its roads. International Business spoke to Ludwig Näf, CEO of RAlpin AG about how this has been achieved and what the future holds. EB: Mr. Näf, you were appointed EB: How does RAlpin achieve this? separately in comfortable carriages make the service attractive to driv- CEO of RAlpin AG at the beginning where they can relax over food and ers. If they would rather take their of July this year. What was it that Ludwig Näf: RAlpin AG is the prod- drinks and ensure that they take statutory break in their truck cabin attracted you to the company? uct of laws passed in Switzerland the legally required rest periods. at a lorry park, then we won’t be aimed at shifting goods transports able to persuade them to use our Ludwig Näf: I have spent my entire passing through the Alps from the EB: Switzerland bans lorry drivers service.
    [Show full text]