Oskar Kokoschka and Masaryk*

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Oskar Kokoschka and Masaryk* Oskar Kokoschka and Masaryk* JOSEF P. HODIN Oskar Kokoschka, born in Pochlarn, Austria, on March 1, 1886, is a truly cosmopolitan artist. His father was of Czech origin, his mother Austrian. He is claimed today by the Czechs, the Austrians, the Ger- mans, and the English as their leading painter. He never exchanged his Austrian passport for a German one, although it was suggested to him on various occasions. He had a Czechoslovak passport during the years when he stayed in Prague as an emigré, 1934-1938. He spent the years from 1938 to 1953 in England. He lives now in Switzerland, with an English passport, is married to a Czech lady, and today shares with Picasso and Chagall a world-wide fame in the ever-decreasing number of those great artists who established the new art of the twentieth century. His sister, Berta Patocková, was resident in Prague until she died in 1960, and Oskar Kokoschka visited her there. She was married to a former General of the Czechoslovak Army. Kokoschka's brother, who settled down in Liebhartstal near Vienna, bears a Czech name: Bohuslav. The origin of Kokoschka's name is Slavonic, and President T. G. Masa- ryk enjoyed discussing with the artist its etymological roots. The Czech lands made a most remarkable contribution to contemporary culture. Renowned poets and authors - Rainer Maria Rilke, Franz Wer- fel, Franz Kafka, Robert Musil, and Karl Kraus - come from this part of the world, as does the progenitor of psychoanalysis, Sigmund Freud, one of the true revolutionaries of our modern age, who, together with Karl Marx and Albert Einstein, changed the fundations of our con- sciousness. Georg Mendel, the founder of modern genetics, was a Mora- vian, and so was Edmund Husserl, the philosopher and initiator of phenomenology, and also Adolf Loos, a friend and supporter of Ko- koschka, a great avant-garde architect, and one of the early theoreti- cians of modern architecture. (Ins Leere gesprochen, Trotzdem). The * For Olda. Oskar Kokoschka and Masaryk 1417 Viennese art historian, Max Dvorak, who conceived the history of art as the history of the human spirit (Kunstgeschichte als Geistesgeschichte) was of Bohemian origin, as was also the composer, Gustav Mahler. Kokoschka said to me: "My father still spoke Czech, which we could no longer do." His father, who was a jeweller and goldsmith, had made for his journeyman's piece, the chalice for the Chapel of St. Wenceslas in the Cathedral of St. Vitus in Prague. His mother was a beauty who might have stepped straight out of a picture by Manes. "Their workshop in Prague was highly thought of, and the Emperor Franz I is said to have visited it often, in ordinary civilian clothes, to buy a new snuff-box or to see about the setting of a stone, but more often because my grandmother was such a beautiful woman. On such occasions, he would be invited to stay and drink a cup of coffee. I was told that my father, as a young apprentice, was once lent the Emperor's top hat and malacca cane, and that the Emperor freed him from his in- voluntary imprisonment within the top hat where his head had entirely disappeared!" Kokoschka's father lived in a time when the arts and crafts suffered their first shock from the spread of industrialization. He lost his fortune and, finally, his job. "My father was an embittered man", Kokoschka told me. "He hated the whole world - a Dostoievsky char- acter. He was negative, proud, arrogant, impatient of all compromise. He was at war with the world." "We had many relatives in Vienna. One of the nephews by the name of Schebek shot himself on account of a love affair he had with a woman of the aristocracy. Another ran the Kokoschka School for the study of the piano in the Mariahilf district. He was the leading teacher at the Theresianum. Yet another was the Hofrat Glossy, director of the city library. As a boy he had known Grillparzer, and he was an author- ity in the field of Viennese cultural history. My father wanted no con- tact with any of them. The reason was that he was on the defensive be- cause his business was going downhill. He felt it an injustice that he could do nothing about it. He felt himself an artist, and so he became solitary. "He was a remarkably handsome man. His hair retained its original brown till late in life, and he wore a long, luxuriant beard. I once made a drawing of him, but it was not a good one. I felt that he would soon die and something within me held me back. At the age of seventy he was still very strong, so strong that he could lift a chair from the ground 1418 Josef P. Hodin with two fingers. He could speak several languages and he had read a great deal. One of the first books he gave me, and that was before I could read, was the Orbis Pictus of Jan Amos Comenius. Schiller's 'freedom plays' and works of Herder and Lessing were among the books read aloud to us of an evening. Once he brought me a magic lantern with puzzle pictures, then books on films, and, often, drawings, for he knew how much pleasure these gave me. Later he took great interest in my collection of books, and he took charge of my art treas- ures in his own room." In Kokoschka's picture of the harbour of Stockholm can be seen the beginning of that early series of town views, the most important of which were painted in the years from 1924 to 1930. The pictures of the city of Prague were painted between 1934 and 1937 and belong to the middle period. They occupy a special place in the sum total of his work. Kokoschka painted this home town of his paternal ancestors more often than any other. His pictures of Prague are less forthright in colour than those he painted in Dresden. We find in them, rather, that depth of space which characterises his views of London, combined with the luminosity of those painted in the South, in Italy, Spain, and Africa, so that they seem to present, as it were, a synthesis of North and South, of cold and warm; and this is something that corresponds to thfe character of this fabulous city, which Wilhelm von Humboldt ranked among the seven most beautiful cities of the world. In this connection, also, it is worth noting that Kokoschka himself in some of these pic- tures arrived at a synthesis of his earlier, more graphically detailed style and the strong colour of his later mature work, in which he achieved such tremendous power of expression. This is particularly evident in "Prague from the Villa Kramar", in "Prague, seen from the Schonborngarden", further in "Prague, View of the Banks of the Vltava I and II", and "Prague, View from the Vltava Pier, I-IV". A final picture of the great city, "Prague-Nostalgia", was painted from memory in 1938 in London. Kokoschka has always loved both Prague and Vienna. In his fore- word to an essay by Professor Hans Tietze, Kokoschka wrote in 1943: "Vienna looks with hope towards her sister city, Prague. It is not only their past, but also their future, that connects the spiritual history of related peoples. Prague has been called the most westerly of oriental cities. In her beauty, her spiritual power, her historic character, she stands by Vienna not as a rival but as a companion in a like destiny. Oskar Kokoschka and Masaryk 1419 They are as two lovely sisters, each with her own grace and charm. And above all they are witnesses to a common culture which in the West is a centre of spiritual exchange, showing the East what the West has to offer and what the West signifies for the East." In a letter to me, Dr. Hugo Feigl, the Prague art dealer, later owner of the Feigl Gallery in New York, wrote: "During his stay in Prague, Kokoschka painted six big views and a small one for me, which is the greatest number of pictures he ever painted of any one city in his career as an artist. When Kokoschka had found a suitable point from which to paint his landscape, my honored task was (diplomatically) to ar- range that he be allowed to occupy it undisturbed for some time. And it was no easy task, if you consider all the odd places where Kokoschka chose to set up his easel. On one occasion, it was in the private house of a bank director's widow; on another, it was on the balcony of the water- works office on the banks of the Vltava, peopled by its unsuspecting busy officials, and again, it was at the window in the retreat of the mem- bers of the Order of the Cross. Dr. Vlasak, Grand Master of the Order, whom I knew well, had, as a matter of fact, emptied the room indicated by Kokoschka, and had put it at his disposal for three weeks. Yet an- other spot chosen by Kokoschka was on the Vysehrad Rock, where we had to clamber around for a whole forenoon like mountaineers, and finally, there were the closed gardens of the American Embassy and the wonderfully dominating position occupied by the villa of the retired and ailing politician, Dr. Kramaf, situated on the old fortifications of the Prague Belvedere. What gave us so much pleasure on these expedi- tions was their invariable success.
Recommended publications
  • Architectural Traces of an Admirable Cipher: Eleven in the Opus of Carlo Scarpa1
    Nexus Esecutivo 19-01-2004 9:17 Seite 7 Marco Frascari Architectural Traces of an Admirable Cipher: Eleven in the Opus of Carlo Scarpa1 Consciously or unconsciously, part of the apparatus that architects use in their daily fabrications of the built environment grows out of their understanding of numbers and numerals. Marco Frascari examines the use of number and especially the number 11 in the architecture of Carlo Scarpa. In Scarpa’s opus, it is true that One and One Equals Two, but it is also wonderfully true that A Pair of Ones Makes an Eleven. Imagination is everything (Raymond Roussel 1975, p. 279). Introduction In their daily fabrications of the built environment, architects deal with the various chiastic relationships between visible and invisible. Part of the apparatus that they use, consciously or unconsciously, to imagine future constructions grows out of their understanding of numbers and numerals. To divine future buildings they rely on numeracy.2 Architectural numeracy consists in neither objective nor subjective constructs based on an arithmetical use of numbers, but rather in sedimentations of experience, formed by matter and memory. By the agency of tectonic aspects controlled by numbers, architects relate visible construction with invisible constructs. By linking recollection and anticipations, architectural numeracy deals with the meanings of constructional aspects and gives new visual angles. By using poli-dimensional tools of transversal epistemologies such as “angelic numbers” and “monstrous numerals”, the architect’s control of numbers transacts tangible matter with intangible dreams. Numbers summon up in detailed examinations what is passing and what is to come. Embodied in tectonic events and parts, numbers hinge the past and the future of buildings and their inhabitants into a search for a way of life with no impairment caused by psychic activity.
    [Show full text]
  • Retrospective Exhibit-Oscar Kokoschka
    THE MUSEUM OF MODERN ART £ ~?~- ft WEST 53 STREET, NEW YORK 19, N. Y. TELEPHONE: CIRCLE 5-8900 [$07l5 - Sk FOR WEDNESDAY RELEASE OSKAR K0K0SCHKAf FAMOUS EXPRESSIONIST PAINTER, SEEN IN RETROSPECTIVE EXHIBITION AT MUSEUM The first major retrospective exhibition in New York of the well-known Austrian expressionist Oskar Kokoschka will be on view at the Museum of Modern Art, 11 West 53 Street, from July 20 to September 28, More than JO paintings, an early sculpture and a selection of prints and book illustrations summarize the artist* s career of l|0 years. Loans from European and American museums include 5 major works from The Austrian State Picture Gallery never before exhibited in this country. Two recent canvases are to arrive from Switzerland in time for the New York opening* The exhibition was assembled for circulation by the Boston Institute of Contemporary Art and has been shown in 1| other American cities. It Is to be installed in the first floor galleries by Margaret Miller of the Museum of Modern Art's Department of Painting and Sculp­ ture. A personality of great and diverse talents, Kokoschka has fought throughout his stormy career as a pamphleteer, playwright and painter for the freedom of the artist and the integrity of the individual. The first of the "degenerate" artists in the Hitler sense of the word, he | estimates that the Nazis destroyed perhaps one-third of his total work. The artist's portraits show us the personalities involved in the intel­ lectual ferment of pre-World War I Vienna, as well as of the doomed .
    [Show full text]
  • The Symbolic Form of Architecture
    THE SYMBOLIC FORM OF ARCHITECTURE An investigation into its philosophical foundations and a discussion on the development of the perception of architectural form by modern theoreticians and symbolist architects by Scott Rimmer Thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Architecture APPROVED BY: Hans Christian Rott, Chairman Maria Karvouni, Member Markus Breitschmid, Member April 28, 1997 Alexandria, Virginia Copyright © 1996, Scott C. Rimmer THE SYMBOLIC FORM OF ARCHITECTURE An investigation into its philosophical foundations and a discussion on the development of the perception of architectural form by modern theoreticians and symbolist architects by Scott Rimmer Chairman: Hans Christian Rott, Graduate School of Architecture (ABSTRACT) This thesis investigates the concept of the symbolic form of architecture. It first focuses on the philosophical foundations for this concept in the works of Ernst Cassirer, Immanuel Kant, Conrad Fiedler, and Theodor Adorno. Then, the development of the modern perception of form in architectural theoreticians, where “modern” architectural theory evolved from an analogical state into a symbolic state, is examined: Karl Bötticher’s concept of a Junktur and his attempt to transcend the presumed dichotomy in architecture between ornamentation and form is discussed; Gottfried Semper’s concept of style and Alois Riegl’s concept of motif are presented as reactions against what they saw as the mechanistic reliance on structure as definitive of form in architecture; Louis Sullivan’s ornamentation is discussed as an attempt to integrate structure and ornamentation into a morphological whole; Otto Wagner’s attempt to purge architecture from analogical responses through a strictly constructional basis for ornamentation is presented; and Adolf Loos’ dismissal of decorative ornamentation, since it is an impediment towards true aesthetic judgment, is examined.
    [Show full text]
  • Ikonotheka 30, 2020
    IKONOTHEKA 30, 2020 Tomáš Murár insTiTuTe oF arT hisTory, czech academy oF sciences, czech republic orcid: 0000-0002-3418-1941 https://doi.org/10.31338/2657-6015ik.30.1 “A work of art is an object that necessitates contemplation”. Latency of visual studies within the Vienna School of Art History? Abstract This article investigates a research method of the so-called Vienna School of Art History, mainly its transformation by Max Dvořák around the First World War. The article suggests the possible influence of Georg Simmel’s philosophy on Dvořák in this time, evident mainly in Dvořák’s interpretation of Pieter Bruegel the Elder’s art, written by Dvořák in 1920 and published posthumously in 1921. This another view on the Vienna School of Art History is then researched in writings on Pieter Bruegel the Elder by Dvořák’s students Hans Sedlmayr and Charles de Tolnay when Tolnay extended Dvořák’s thinking and Sedlmayr challenged its premises – both Tolnay and Sedlmayr thus in the same time interpreted Bruegel’s art differently, even though they were both Dvořák’s students. The article then suggests a possible interpretative relationship of the Vienna School of Art History after its transformation by Max Dvořák with today’s approaches to art (history), mainly with the so-called visual studies. Keywords: Max Dvořák, Vienna School of Art History, Georg Simmel, Visual Studies, Charles de Tolnay, Hans Sedlmayr. Introduction In Max Dvořák’s text on the art of Pieter Bruegel the Elder, written in 1920 and published posthumously in 1921,1 a reference to Georg Simmel’s interpretation of 1 M.
    [Show full text]
  • Viennese Art, Ugliness, and the Vienna School of Art History: the Vicissitudes of Theory and Practice
    Viennese art, ugliness, and the Vienna school of art history: the vicissitudes of theory and practice Kathryn Simpson Around 1900 in Vienna, the concept of ugliness developed a new significance in both art theory and practice. The theorists of the Vienna school of art history, including Franz Wickhoff, Alois Riegl, and later Otto Benesch and Max Dvoř{k, rejected the scholarly tradition of Germanic contemporaries like renowned art historian Heinrich Wölfflin, who championed classical art as the highest aesthetic good. By contrast the Vienna school art historians opposed absolute aesthetics and its insistence that a specifically classical beauty was the goal of all art.1 At the dawn of the twentieth century, Wickhoff and Riegl both presented radically new theories arguing for a revaluation of aesthetic values, a non-hierarchical relationship between so-called beauty and ugliness, and the importance of developing an art that was appropriate for the age. Ugliness was suddenly spotlighted in Viennese artistic practice as well. Gustav Klimt was the undisputed king of the Viennese art scene; he had inherited the throne from the revered history painter, designer, and decorator Hans Makart, whose sensual, decorative sensibility had defined late-nineteenth-century tastes in Vienna, giving rise to the term Makartstil, or ‘Makart style.’ After three years as the leader of the Vienna Secession movement, Klimt produced a series of works of art which enraged sectors of the intellectual establishment and the general public, who reacted in particular to the purported ugliness of Klimt’s latest visions. Yet shortly thereafter young Viennese artists eager to lead what they called the ‘new art’ movement began to develop deliberate strategies of ugliness to help create and buttress their own antagonistic artistic personae.
    [Show full text]
  • The Text and the Coming of Age of the Avant-Garde in Germany
    The Text and the Coming of Age of the Avant-Garde in Germany Timothy 0. Benson Visible Language XXI 3/4 365-411 The radical change in the appearance of the text which oc­ © 1988 Visible Language curred in German artists' publications during the teens c/o Rhode Island School of Design demonstrates a coming of age of the avant-garde, a transfor­ Providence, RI 02903 mation in the way the avant-garde viewed itself and its role Timothy 0. Benson within the broader culture. Traditionally, the instrumental Robert Gore Riskind Center for purpose of the text had been to interpret an "aesthetic" ac­ German Expressionist Studies tivity and convey the historical intentions and meaning as­ Los Angeles County Museum ofArt sociated with that activity. The prerogative of artists as 5905 Wilshire Boulevard well as critics, apologists and historians, the text attempted Los Angeles, CA 90036 to reach an observer believed to be "situated" in a shared web of events, thus enacting the historicist myth based on the rationalist notion of causality which underlies the avant­ garde. By the onset of the twentieth century, however, both the rationalist basis and the utopian telos generally as­ sumed in the historicist myth were being increasingly chal­ lenged in the metaphors of a declining civilization, a dis­ solving self, and a disintegrating cosmos so much a part of the cultural pessimism of the symbolist era of "deca­ dence."1 By the mid-teens, many of the Expressionists had gone beyond the theme of an apocalypse to posit a catastro­ phe so deep as to void the whole notion of progressive so­ cial change.2 The aesthetic realm, as an arena of pure form and structure rather than material and temporal causality, became more than a natural haven for those artists and writers who persisted in yearning for such ideals as Total­ itiit; that sense of wholeness for the individual and human- 365 VISIBLE LANGUAGE XXI NUMBER 3/4 1987 *65.
    [Show full text]
  • Master of Modern —Pilsen 01 Preface Adolf Loos Was a Key Figure in Architecture but His Legacy Has Had to Endure Turbulent Times in His Czech Homeland
    report Adolf Loos Tt 50 MASTER OF MODERN —Pilsen 01 Preface Adolf Loos was a key figure in architecture but his legacy has had to endure turbulent times in his Czech homeland. Now that restorations of his most dazzling interiors are underway, his designs are set to be revealed in all their glory once more. writer Joann Plockova photographer Daniel Gebhart de Koekkoek In 2014, architect Ludvík Grym spent a night in a sleeping bag on the floor of a flat in Pilsen, CzechR epublic. Located at 10 Bendova Street, the apartment’s inte- rior was designed by a legend of modern 20th-century architecture: Adolf Loos. Grym, who is based in Brno – where Loos was born – was the architect selected to design and supervise its restoration. “That was part of my process of get- ting in touch with the atmosphere,” says Grym. In addition to a flat at Klatovská 12 and Brummel House at Husova 58, 02 issue 83 — 125 report All natural Adolf Loos Adolf Loos was born in 1870 in Brno, today the Czech Republic’s second- largest city but then the capital of Moravia within the Austro-Hungarian Previous page: empire. His work extended 01 Original sideboard at beyond his home city to Bendova 10 Vienna – with which he is 02 Apartment curtain most associated – Paris, Prague and Pilsen. Loos This spread: was profoundly influenced 01 Bendova 10 restoration by his stay in the US head Ludvík Grym between 1893 and 1896. 02 Built-in picture frame at Loos’ essay Ornament Klatovská 12 and Crime, in which he 03 Bedroom dressing table Tt 50 attacked the decoration of 04 Varnishing original Viennese Secessionism, wood in the bedroom was the basis for a lecture at Brummel House he gave in 1910 that came 05 Radiator’s play a key role to define his influential in Loos’s interiors role in modernism.
    [Show full text]
  • Max Dvorák Und Die Revision Der Mittelalter-Kunstgeschichte Im
    Max Dvořák and the History of Medieval Art Hans H. Aurenhammer Figure 1 Max Dvořák (1874–1921) Max Dvořák (fig. 1) is known primarily for his book Kunstgeschichte als Geistesgeschichte as well as for his modernist interpretations of Tintoretto and El Greco which led to the rehabilitation of Mannerism. It may thus come as a surprise that, on the occasion of the hundredth anniversary of his birth, his former assistant Karl Maria Swoboda remarked that Dvořák actually devoted his lifework not to the art of the sixteenth century, but above all to the ‘universal-historical’ interpretation of the Middle Ages.1 This essay was read at the Viennese Art Historiography Colloquium at the University of Glasgow (2nd-3rd October 2009) which was organized by Richard Woodfield. It was translated by Judith Rosenthal, Frankfurt am Main. To maintain the character of a lecture the notes have been limited to the absolutely necessary citations. A different and more extensive version of the essay (with full citations in German) will be published in the acts of the symposium ‚Die Etablierung und Entwicklung des Faches Kunstgeschichte in Deutschland, Polen und Mitteleuropa’ which has been held at Cracow in 2007. 1 Karl Maria Swoboda, ‘Vortrag zum 30. Todestag von Max Dvorák. Gehalten an der Universität Wien’, Österreichische Zeitschrift für Kunst und Denkmalpflege XXVIII (1974), p. 76. Hans Aurenhammer Max Dvořák and the History of Medieval Art Dvořák’s published writings do not seem to substantiate this assertion in the least. Naturally, we know that two of Dvořák’s most extensive essays were concerned with the Middle Ages: The Enigma of the Art of the Van Eyck Brothers2 and Idealism and Naturalism in Gothic Sculpture and Painting.3 In the text on the Van Eycks, which was published in 1904, the young Dvořák undertook to test the evolutionist paradigm of the Viennese school of art history against a previously unparalleled historical rupture: the amazing naturalism practised by the early Netherlandish painters.
    [Show full text]
  • This Thesis Has Been Submitted in Fulfilment of the Requirements for a Postgraduate Degree (E.G
    This thesis has been submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for a postgraduate degree (e.g. PhD, MPhil, DClinPsychol) at the University of Edinburgh. Please note the following terms and conditions of use: • This work is protected by copyright and other intellectual property rights, which are retained by the thesis author, unless otherwise stated. • A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. • This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the author. • The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author. • When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given. The Monument Question in Late Habsburg Austria A Critical Introduction to Max Dvořák’s Denkmalpflege Jonathan Blower Doctor of Philosophy The University of Edinburgh 2012 Abstract The present thesis is a critical introduction to a body of writings on heritage conservation by the Czech-born art historian Max Dvořák (1874–1921). From 1905 onwards, Dvořák was both professor of art history at the University of Vienna and Conservator General at the state institution responsible for heritage conservation in Austria: the ‘Royal and Imperial Central Commission for the Research and Preservation of Artistic and Historical Monuments’ (est. 1850). His published and archival texts on the subject are presented here for the first time in English translation. In this sense, the thesis follows the model of existing scholarship on the visual arts in Vienna around 1900, namely the combined English translations and critical introductions to the writings of Camillo Sitte (Collins & Collins, 1986), Otto Wagner (Mallgrave, 1988) and Alois Riegl (Forster & Ghirardo, 1982).
    [Show full text]
  • Architecture and Copyright: Loos, Law, and the Culture of the Copy
    Architecture and Copyright: Loos, Law, and the Culture of the Copy Today’s architectural model workshops have become alchemi- cal chambers of curiosity, invested in turning information from digital files and various powders, sugars, or liquids into solid three-dimensional objects. Machines such as the lat- est EOSINT M270 can build in bronze alloy, steel, and cobalt chrome used for “tooling” and “prototyping.” Thus, simulta- neous and very similar to the development of contemporary design techniques, the entire process of copying emerges at the intersec- tion of a set of digital media and design technologies. But what makes the Ines Weizman copy—and, in particular, the architectural copy—so interesting is that it is London Metropolitan University a phenomenon of modernity. Just like the print, the photograph, the film, or the digital file, it is both a product of the media and a media form that in every situation and period reflects on the existing means of examination, production, and reproduction. We tend to think of the problem of mimicry within architecture and media as belonging to photography; sometimes, we discuss the media facades of buildings, but in these cases the agent and agency of mediatization moves through images. As reproduction technologies start shifting into the third dimension, we must relocate the discussion of the copy from the context of the fake and copyright law and place it at the heart of the media field. The copy is a reproduction—a media form in itself—referring both to itself and to its original, a part of an endless series of “aura-less” multiplications.
    [Show full text]
  • Factsheet Englisch LM.Indd
    THE LEOPOLD MUSEUM SCHIELE, KLIMT AND JUGENDSTIL Leopold Museum, Vienna Egon Schiele, Self Portrait, 1912 Egon Schiele, Portrait Wally Neuzil, 1912 MASTERPIECES OF ART IN THE HEART OF VIENNA One can hardly think of another museum in which the passion for collecting is manifested as strongly as in Vienna’s Leopold Museum. Within the span of a few decades, the physician and collector Rudolf Leopold assembled a collection of more than 5,000 carefully selected artworks. Masterpieces by Gustav Klimt, the world’s largest Egon Schiele collection and key works by Oskar Kokoschka provide fascinating insight into the art of the 20th century. THE WORLD´S LARGEST EGON SCHIELE COLLECTION The abundance of key works by Egon Schiele (1890-1918) in the Leopold Collection is astonishing: “Cardinal and Nun”, “Setting Sun”, “Self-Portrait with Chinese Lanterns”, “Dead City”, “Reclin- ing Woman”, “The Island City” and more. There are works from all of the important phases in the artist’s career. GUSTAV KLIMT The Leopold Museum shows several key masterpieces by Seces- Gustav Klimt, Death and Life, 1910/15 sion founder Gustav Klimt, including “Death and Life”, “Atter- see” and “Still Pond”. VIENNA 1900 Gustav Klimt was among those artists who founded the Vienna In Addition to featuring the works of the expressionist Egon Secession in 1897, and he served as the institution’s first presi - Schiele, the Leopold Museum has also made a name for itself as dent. He played a major role in the development of international the museum of Viennese Art Nouveau. No other museum offers Art Nouveau in Vienna around 1900.
    [Show full text]
  • Modernism in Visual Arts and Music
    HUM 102 Cultural Encounters II Modernism in Visual Arts and Music Rana Gediz İren Boğaziçi University İstanbul Philharmonic Society Arts in Europe 1900-1945 Artists began to emphasise the extreme expressive properties of pictorial form to explore subjective emotions and inner psychological truths while composers of Classical Music turned to radical new ways of expressing melody, harmony and rhythm Sigmund Freud (1856-1839) • Austrian neurologist who is the founder of psychoanalysis. • The Interpretation of Dreams (1900). • Explorations of the role of sexuality and the subconscious. Friedrich Nietzsche (1844-1900) • German philosopher and cultural critic. His writings on truth, morality, aesthetics, cultural theory, nihilism, consciousness, and the meaning of existence have exerted an enormous influence on Western philosophy and intellectual history. • Metaphor of the “Bridge”: Mankind as a bridge between the animal and the superman/overman. Emil Nolde (1867-1956), Self Portrait, 1947 Modernism in Germany - Expressionism • Developed in pre-WW1 Years. • Characterised by simplified shapes, bright colours and gestural marks or brushstrokes. • The image of reality is distorted in order to make it expressive of the artist’s inner feelings or ideas. • Concerned with the contemporary psychological situation. Confession of moods of anxiety, frustration and resentment towards the modern world. Die Brücke (The Bridge) – Dresden 1905 Der Blaue Reiter (The Blue Rider) – Munich 1911 “We call all young people together and as young people who carry the
    [Show full text]