Morphology and Molecular Phylogeny of Two Little-Known Species of Loxodes, L
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
J. Ocean Univ. China (Oceanic and Coastal Sea Research) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11802-019-3897-3 ISSN 1672-5182, 2019 18 (3): 643-653 http://www.ouc.edu.cn/xbywb/ E-mail:[email protected] Morphology and Molecular Phylogeny of Two Little-Known Species of Loxodes, L. kahli Dragesco & Njiné, 1971 and L. rostrum Müller, 1786 (Protist, Ciliophora, Karyorelictea) WANG Lun, QU Zhishuai, LI Song, and HU Xiaozhong* Institute of Evolution and Marine Biodiversity, Key Laboratory of Mariculture, Ministry of Education, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266003, China (Received April 26, 2018; revised May 2, 2018; accepted December 5, 2018) © Ocean University of China, Science Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2019 Abstract The morphology and phylogeny of two little-known species, Loxodes kahli Dragesco & Njiné, 1971 and L. rostrum Müller, 1786, isolated from freshwater muddy sediments in China, were investigated based on live features, infraciliature, and small subunit ribosomal DNA (SSU rDNA) sequence data. Loxodes kahli is distinguished from its congeners mainly by the num- ber and arrangement of macronuclei (6–17 in one row) and the number of right somatic ciliary rows (11–26). The Chinese popula- tions of L. kahli also exhibit differences with other populations in terms of the body size and the number of right ciliary rows. The characteristics of L. rostrum are consistent with those of previous studies except for the number of right ciliary rows (9–10). The studied species were redefined based on the new information and previous descriptions. This study also gave a brief morphological summary of the species in the genus Loxodes by an identification key. SSU rDNA sequence-based phylogenetic analyses revealed that both species are grouped with their congeners, supporting the monophyly of the genus Loxodes. Key words anaerobe; benthic ciliate; ciliature; Loxodida; SSU rDNA chel and Finlay, 1984; Finlay, 1985; Fenchel and Finlay, 1 Introduction 1986; Finlay et al., 1986; Buonanno, 2005; Buonanno et al., 2005) or L. magnus Stokes, 1887 (Goulder, 1972; Since the introduction of a new fixative, and the com- Bobyleva et al., 1980; Raikov, 1982, 1994, 1996). More- bination of Wilbert’s protargol and Fernandez-Galiano’s over, the detailed information on the ciliature is only silver carbonate staining methods, the infraciliature data available for these species (Foissner and Rieder, 1983; of more than 40 species of karyorelicteans have been Kim et al., 2009) and L. vorax Stokes, 1885 (Xu et al., revealed (e.g., Foissner and Al-Rasheid, 1999; Song et al., 2015). For the remaining species of Loxodes, i.e., L. kahli 2009; Xu et al., 2012, 2013a, b, c, 2014, 2015, 2017; Yan Dragesco and Njiné, 1971, L. rostrum Müller, 1786, and et al., 2013, 2015a, b, 2016a, b, 2017; Liu et al., 2017). L. rex Dragesco, 1970, more detailed information re- Similar to most other marine karyorelicteans, members of garding the oral and somatic ciliature is still lacking. the genus Loxodes Ehrenberg, 1830 are often laterally Loxodes kahli was firstly discovered in Cameroon, Af- flattened and live in various freshwater environments, rica by Dragesco and Njiné (1971), who provided a brief such as muddy sediments and anaerobic water columns (Lynn, 2008). As the only freshwater representative of description, including the size, the number of macronu- karyorelicteans, Loxodes species have been widely used clei and micronuclei, and a sketch of ciliature. From then in the study of the nuclear division (Bobyleva et al., 1980; on, no other descriptions were available until the organ- Raikov, 1982, 1994, 1996), structure and function of ism was identified in South Korea (Kim et al., 2009). Müller vesicles (Fenchel and Finlay, 1986), perception However, in these investigations there was not statistic and reaction to oxygen and nitrate (Finlay, 1985; Finlay information about the detailed ciliature and DNA se- et al., 1986), defensive behavior (Buonanno, 2005; Buo- quences. L. rostrum was firstly identified by Müller (1786). nanno et al., 2005), geotaxis (Fenchel and Finlay, 1984; Then Raikov (1959) provided the related nuclear infor- Neugebauer et al., 1998), and grazing behavior (Goulder, mation, and Dragesco (1970), Dragesco and Dragesco- 1972). However, these investigations mainly focused on Kernéis (1986), and Foissner (1995) all gave similar de- L. striatus Penard, 1917 (Raikov, 1982, 1994, 1996; Fen- scriptions of L. rostrum. However, there was not detailed ciliature and molecular information in these descriptions. * Corresponding author. Tel: 0086-532-82031610 In this paper, we studied L. kahli collected from two E-mail: [email protected] freshwater habitats in Qingdao and Shenzhen, and L. 644 WANG et al. / J. Ocean Univ. China (Oceanic and Coastal Sea Research) 2019 18: 643-653 rostrum isolated from freshwater habitat in Zhanjiang, 2016 from the sediments of Buji River, Shenzhen, south- China with the detailed description of its morphology. ern China (22˚32΄N, 114˚06΄E), where the water tem- With our knowledge, this is the first time to study these perature was about 22℃ (Fig.1). L. rostrum was col- species. In addition, we summarized the morphological lected on April 14, 2014 from the sediments in a fresh- characters of the six species within this genus and ana- water lake in Huguangyan scenic spot in Zhanjiang, Chi- lyzed the evolutionary position of Loxodes based on na (21˚08΄N, 110˚17΄E), where the water temperature was small subunit ribosomal DNA (SSU rDNA) sequence about 23℃ (Fig.1). The cells were isolated by micro- data. pipettes and observed in vivo using bright-field and dif- ferential interference microscopy. The ciliature was re- 2 Materials and Methods vealed by the protargol staining method (Wilbert, 1975). The counts and measurements on stained specimens were 2.1 Sampling and Morphological Investigations performed at a magnification of 1000 × (Microscope The first population of L. kahli was collected on May Olympus BX53). The line drawings were made by free- 25, 2016 from the sediments in a freshwater pond in hand sketches or with the help of the camera lucida. The Baihuayuan Park, Qingdao, northern China (36˚03΄N, terminology and systematics are mainly in accordance 120˚21΄E), where the water temperature was about 20℃ with the works of Foissner (1996) and Gao et al. (2016), (Fig.1). The second one was collected on December 15, respectively. Fig.1 Sampling location. A, A pond in Baihuayuan Park, Qingdao (36˚03΄N, 120˚21΄E); B, Buji River, Shenzhen (22˚32΄N, 114˚06΄E); C, A lake in Huguangyan Park, Zhanjiang (21˚08΄N, 110˚17΄E). karyotic universal reverse primer 18SR (5’-TGA TCC 2.2 DNA Extraction, Polymerase Chain Reaction TTC TGC AGG TTC ACC TAC-3’) (Medlin et al., 1988). (PCR), and Gene Sequencing The PCR products were sequenced bidirectionally in the The genomic DNA extraction, PCR, and sequencing of Tsingke Biological Technology Company (Qingdao, China). the SSU rDNA gene were performed as described in the The contigs were assembled by Seqman (DNAStar). work of Gao et al. (2013). One or more cells were iso- lated from the environmental samples and washed for 2.3 Phylogenetic Analyses several times with filtered water from the sampled envi- The phylogenetic analyses, which were performed ac- ronment (0.22 µm) to remove contaminants. The cells cording to the study of Wang et al. (2017), included three were then transferred to a 1.5 mL Eppendorf tube with a new sequences in the present study and another 46 se- minimum volume of water. The genomic DNA was ex- quences that were downloaded from the National Center tracted using DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Hil- for Biotechnology Information GenBank database (ac- den, Germany) following the manufacturer’s instructions. cession numbers shown in Fig.6). All the sequences were The PCR amplification of SSU rDNA was performed by aligned using the GUIDANCE2 Server (Sela et al., 2015) Q5 PremixTaq with the forward primer (5’-GCC AGT with default settings, and the resulting alignment was AGT SAT ATG CTT GTC T-3’) designed by our col- manually modified using BioEdit v.7.2.5 (Hall, 1999). league, Mr. Weibo Zheng (Yan et al., 2016b) and the eu- The maximum likelihood (ML) analyses were performed WANG et al. / J. Ocean Univ. China (Oceanic and Coastal Sea Research) 2019 18: 643-653 645 in CIPRES Science Gateway (URL: http://www.phylo.org/ sub_sections/portal) (Miller et al., 2010) using RAxML- HPC2 (Stamatakis et al., 2008) on XSEDE v.8.1.24 with 3 Results and Discussion the GTRGAMMA+I model. The reliability of internal 3.1 L. kahli Dragesco & Njiné, 1971 (Figs.2A–2F branches was assessed using a nonparametric bootstrap and 3; Table 1) method with 1000 replicates. The Bayesian inference (BI) analyses were carried out by MrBayes on XSEDE 3.2.6 This organism has been redescribed only once (Kim in CIPRES Science Gateway with the model GTR+I+G et al., 2009) since it was firstly reported by Dragesco and as selected by MrModeltest v.2.2 (Nylander, 2004). Njiné (1971), who were cited by Dragesco and Dragesco- Markov chain Monte Carlo simulations were run with Kernéis (1986). However, no detailed information is two sets of four chains for 6000000 generations with a available about its infraciliature, especially the oral ap- sampling frequency of 100 generations, and 25% of them paratus. On the basis of the new data, the discussion be- were discarded as burn-in. MEGA v.7.0.21 was used to low provides an improved diagnosis and redescription of visualize the tree topologies. the species. Fig.2 L. kahli in vivo (A) and after protargol staining (B–F); L. rostrum in vivo (G) and after protargol staining (H–J). A, G, Right side of a representative individual.