San Luis Valley Conservation Area EA and LPP EA Chapter 3

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

San Luis Valley Conservation Area EA and LPP EA Chapter 3 Chapter 3 — Affected Environment This chapter describes the biological, cultural, and on the eastern side of the valley floor, the Oligocene socioeconomic resources of the SLVCA that could be volcanic rocks of the San Juan Mountains dip gently affected by the no-action alternative (alternative A) eastward into the valley floor, where they are inter- and the proposed action (alternative B). The SLVCA bedded with valley-fill deposits. Valley-fill deposits consists of 5.2 million acres within the Southern Rock- consist of sedimentary rocks that inter-finger with ies and Arizona/New Mexico Plateau ecoregions (U.S. volcanic deposits. Quaternary deposits include pedi- Environmental Protection Agency 2011). The project ments along the mountain fronts, alluvium, and sand encompasses significant portions of seven counties in dunes (USFWS 2011). southern Colorado as well as small parts of two coun- ties in northern New Mexico. Just over 50 percent of MINERALS the total project area is publicly owned; however, the Sand and gravel are the major mineral commodities distribution of public/private ownership is uneven, with mined in the vicinity of the San Luis Valley. Rock, over 90 percent of Mineral County administered by sand, and gravel mines are scattered throughout the the USFS, but less than 1 percent of Costilla County valley, but are concentrated around the cities of Ala- in State or Federal ownership. The project boundary mosa and Monte Vista and the town of Del Norte, is defined by the headwaters hydrologic unit (HUC Colorado. No coal mining permits are active in the 6) of the Rio Grande. SLVCA (Colorado Division of Reclamation, Mining, Because of the nearly 7,000 feet in elevation change and Safety 2012). Other minerals that are mined in the across the project area, the SLVCA contains a diverse area include gold, silver, peat, and limestone. There array of plant communities, ranging from rabbitbrush is also nascent oil and gas exploration in the valley scrub and playa wetlands on the valley floor to alpine (USFWS 2011). tundra and scree fields on the peaks of the surround- ing mountains. As described in detail in this chapter, WATER AND HYDROLOGY the habitats of the valley and surrounding mountains Surface Water are crucial to the breeding and migration of migra- The SLVCA contains the upper headwaters of the Rio tory birds, and provide important opportunities for Grande watershed (Figure 2). Because of its position in persistence or reintroduction of populations of imper- a high-mountain desert, the valley floor receives little iled species that are protected under the Endangered precipitation, and most surface and ground water is a Species Act. result of runoff from the surrounding mountains. There are numerous perennial and intermittent drainages that descend from the Sangre de Cristo and San Juan Mountains. Some of the larger waterways include the Physical Environment Conejos, San Antonio, and Rio Grande rivers. A portion of the northern valley, known as the GEOLOGY Closed Basin or Sump, does not contribute water to The San Luis Valley is part of the much larger Rio the Rio Grande. The Closed Basin may have formed Grande Rift Zone, which extends from southern New in the middle Pleistocene when the lake that filled the Mexico northward through the San Luis and Upper valley began to dry up, resulting in an environment of Arkansas valleys to its northern termination near swamps and organic-rich sediments. Mayo et al. (2006; Leadville, Colorado (McCalpin 1996). The San Luis as cited in USFWS 2011) refer to the Closed Basin of Valley is bordered on the east by the linear Sangre Pleistocene time as the “ancestral sump.” Currently, de Cristo Mountains, which were created by exten- the Closed Basin covers approximately 2,940 square sive block faulting during the Laramide Orogeny. The miles in the northern part of the valley and is separated north-northwest portion of the valley is bordered by from the rest of the valley by a low alluvial fan. The the southernmost reach of the Sawatch Mountains. Closed Basin is composed of the San Luis and Sagua- The west side of the valley is flanked by the San Juan che creek drainage basins. Water enters the Closed Mountains, the result of extensive Tertiary-aged volca- Basin through precipitation and snowmelt from the nism. In sharp contrast to the steeply rising mountains 4,700 square miles of watershed in the surrounding 10 Draft EA, San Luis Valley Conservation Area, Colorado and New Mexico Figure 2 . The SLVCA captures the upper headwaters of the Rio Grande, the fourth longest river in the United States . Chapter 3 — Affected Environment 11 mountains. Water exits primarily through evapotrans- Grande on Alamosa NWR land. Salvaged Closed Ba- piration. Approximately 7,000 miles of stream chan- sin ground water helps Colorado meet its interstate nels and ditches flow through the valley. Surface water compact with New Mexico and Texas (USFWS 2012). flows into San Luis Creek, which flows generally to the south. There is no outlet, so water is impounded CLIMATE in San Luis Lake and associated lakes in an area south The climate of the San Luis Valley is consistent with of the Baca NWR (USFWS 2011). its high mountain desert setting, with substantial 24- hour temperature swings due to cold air drainage from Groundwater the surrounding mountains. This cold air also creates The project area is in the San Luis Valley portion of winter overnight temperatures that are often much the Rio Grande Aquifer System. The San Luis Valley lower than at many other places at similar elevations is the northernmost portion of the aquifer system that and latitudes. The mid-January high averages 340F stretches from Saguache County, Colorado, to West while the low averages -20F, and the mid-July high Texas (Robson and Banta 1995). The San Luis Valley averages 830F while the low averages 370F. is estimated to contain more than 2 billion acre-feet of Precipitation in the valley is strongly influenced ground water in storage, with more than 140 million by the surrounding mountains. The windward side of acre-feet estimated to be recoverable. The principal the mountain ranges, particularly the San Juan Moun- use of groundwater is agricultural (USFWS 2012). tains, receives a substantial amount of orographic The thick basin-fill deposits in the San Luis Valley precipitation, which is caused when air masses rise consist of interbedded clay, silt, sand, gravel, and vol- and subsequently cool, dumping their precipitation canic rock. These form many separate aquifer systems, at higher elevations. This results in a marked rain which are generally grouped into two major aquifers, shadow effect on the lee side of the mountains, with a shallow unconfined aquifer and a deep confined aqui- annual precipitation in Alamosa averaging 7.25 inches fer, though the lines between these features are not per year (National Weather Service 2012). absolute. Combined, these two aquifer systems are contained in valley-fill that can be as much as 30,000 feet thick (Brendle 2002). The unconfined aquifer is separated, but not totally disconnected, from the confined aquifer by clay layers and lava flows. The Biological Environment unconfined aquifer is recharged through infiltration of precipitation, irrigation water, runoff, and upward PLANT COMMUNITIES seepage of ground water from the confining bed. Dis- The vegetation across the project area varies greatly, charge from the unconfined aquifer is from ground depending on hydrology, slope, aspect, and elevation. water withdrawals, ground water flow to the south, See Figure 3 for an overview of general landcover. The discharge to streams or drains, and evapotranspira- San Luis Valley’s hydrology is strongly influenced by tion. Water levels in the unconfined aquifer respond the surface runoff and ground water flows from the to local climatic events and fall or rise with the avail- surrounding mountains. This hydrology has created a ability of precipitation. Wells drilled into the deep network of riparian corridors and wetlands that break confined aquifer are artesian and are buffered from up large expanses of associated desert and upland habi- climatic conditions. The confined aquifer is recharged tats across a 7,000-foot elevation gradient, resulting from precipitation and snowmelt in the high San Juan in high plant diversity. The six Colorado counties that Mountains and Sangre de Cristo Mountains. Discharge constitute the majority of the project area (Saguache, from the confined aquifer is from ground water with- Mineral, Rio Grande, Costilla, Conejos, and Alamosa) drawals, ground water flow to the south, and upward contain 1,132 species of plants (Appendix B; Colorado leakage through the confining bed (USFWS 2012). State University Herbarium 2012), which is more than A third aquifer system covers approximately 3,000 a third of the total plant species present in Colorado. square miles in the Closed Basin in the northern part Wetlands of the valley. This aquifer system has no natural sur- face water drain. The U.S. Bureau of Reclamation’s Wet Meadows . Wet meadow habitat is naturally pres- Closed Basin Project extracts ground water from ent in the San Luis Valley in areas that have shallow the sump. The water levels in the unconfined aquifer water tables and areas that are periodically shallowly in the Closed Basin are declining and ground water inundated early in the growing season. Wet meadows withdrawal is exceeding recharge (Rio Grande Water are the most widespread wetland type in the San Luis Conservation District 2012). Ground water from the Valley. Dominant plants include Baltic rush, hair grass, Closed Basin Project is carried in the Closed Basin and sedges. Most of the naturally occurring wet mead- Canal, which starts in the central San Luis Valley, ows have been modified by changes in water use, but passes south through Baca NWR, and ends at the Rio in some areas wet meadows have also expanded due 12 Draft EA, San Luis Valley Conservation Area, Colorado and New Mexico Figure 3 .
Recommended publications
  • San Luis Valley Conservation Area Land Protection Plan, Colorado And
    Land Protection Plan San Luis Valley Conservation Area Colorado and New Mexico December 2015 Prepared by San Luis Valley National Wildlife Refuge Complex 8249 Emperius Road Alamosa, CO 81101 719 / 589 4021 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 6, Mountain-Prairie Region Branch of Refuge Planning 134 Union Boulevard, Suite 300 Lakewood, CO 80228 303 / 236 8145 CITATION for this document: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2015. Land protection plan for the San Luis Valley Conservation Area. Lakewood, CO: U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 151 p. In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service policy, an environmental assessment and land protection plan have been prepared to analyze the effects of establishing the San Luis Valley Conservation Area in southern Colorado and northern New Mexico. The environmental assessment (appendix A) analyzes the environmental effects of establishing the San Luis Valley Conservation Area. The San Luis Valley Conservation Area land protection plan describes the priorities for acquiring up to 250,000 acres through voluntary conservation easements and up to 30,000 acres in fee title. Note: Information contained in the maps is approximate and does not represent a legal survey. Ownership information may not be complete. Contents Abbreviations . vii Chapter 1—Introduction and Project Description . 1 Purpose of the San Luis Valley Conservation Area . 2 Vision for the San Luis Valley National Wildlife Refuge Complex . 4 Purpose of the Alamosa and Monte Vista National Wildlife Refuges . 4 Purpose of the Baca national wildlife refuge . 4 Purpose of the Sangre de Cristo Conservation Area .
    [Show full text]
  • INDEX a COLORADO COLLEGE READER Page 274 Abbott
    INDEX INDEX Abbott Academy, 83 Armstrong Hall, 190, 245, 259, Acacia Park, 33 263 Academic Program Committee, Army Signal Corps, 252 181, 189 Arnold Fairyland Doll Store, 112 Africa, 180 Art Nouveau, 115, 117 Ahlberg Adventure Program, 234 Ashland, MA, 36, 55, 58, 60, 61 Ahlberg, Jerry, 234 Ashley, Susan, 271-272 Ahlberg Outdoor Education Aspen, CO, 225 Center, 234 Aspen Institute, 229 Ahlers, Mrs., 98 Aspen Ski Patrol, 221 Albright, Guy, 204 Associated Charities (Baltimore, Albright, Horace, 214 MD), 85 Albuquerque, NM, 19, 37, 62 Associated Students of Colorado Alexander, John, 220 College, 262 Alpha Lambda Delta, 262 Associated Women Students, 262 Amesbury, MA, 39, 83, 84 Avon Pottery Company, American Alpine Club, 214 113 American Alpine Journal, 218 Ayuda, 265-267 American Art Association, 115 “American College,” 75, 86, 89 Baca Campus, 229-230 American College and Education Baltimore, MD, 83, 85 Society, 48, 60 Barbetts, 258 American Political Science Bartlett, Enoch N., 13, 15, 17, 24, Association (APSA), 171 36, 55, 58, 60, 61 “America the Beautiful,” 244 Barton, Ruth, 271 Amherst College, 15, 21, 75, Bates, Katherine Lee, 244 76-81, 89, 92 Baxter, James Phinney, 194-195 Andover-Newton Theological Bennan, Professor, 19 Seminary, 82 Baby Boomers, 262, 265 Andover Theological Seminary, Bangor seminary, 70 39, 81, 82 Bangs, Harry, 122, 127 Appolonian Club, 250 Belschner, Martha, 256 A COLORADO COLLEGE READER Page 274 INDEX Bemis Hall, 101, 105-106, 136, Bramhall, Edith C., 163-177, 256 137, 141, 247, 254, 257, “Brammy,” 171, 175 261, 262 Braun photograph, 101 Bemis, Samuel Flagg, 194-195 Bristol, R.
    [Show full text]
  • Minerals of the San Luis Valley and Adjacent Areas of Colorado Charles F
    New Mexico Geological Society Downloaded from: http://nmgs.nmt.edu/publications/guidebooks/22 Minerals of the San Luis Valley and adjacent areas of Colorado Charles F. Bauer, 1971, pp. 231-234 in: San Luis Basin (Colorado), James, H. L.; [ed.], New Mexico Geological Society 22nd Annual Fall Field Conference Guidebook, 340 p. This is one of many related papers that were included in the 1971 NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebook. Annual NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebooks Every fall since 1950, the New Mexico Geological Society (NMGS) has held an annual Fall Field Conference that explores some region of New Mexico (or surrounding states). Always well attended, these conferences provide a guidebook to participants. Besides detailed road logs, the guidebooks contain many well written, edited, and peer-reviewed geoscience papers. These books have set the national standard for geologic guidebooks and are an essential geologic reference for anyone working in or around New Mexico. Free Downloads NMGS has decided to make peer-reviewed papers from our Fall Field Conference guidebooks available for free download. Non-members will have access to guidebook papers two years after publication. Members have access to all papers. This is in keeping with our mission of promoting interest, research, and cooperation regarding geology in New Mexico. However, guidebook sales represent a significant proportion of our operating budget. Therefore, only research papers are available for download. Road logs, mini-papers, maps, stratigraphic charts, and other selected content are available only in the printed guidebooks. Copyright Information Publications of the New Mexico Geological Society, printed and electronic, are protected by the copyright laws of the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Birding & Nature at Zapata Ranch
    Birding & Nature at Zapata Ranch With Naturalist Journeys & Caligo Ventures A Celebrity Tour with Ted Floyd June 13 – 20, 2021 866.900.1146 800.426.7781 520.558.1146 [email protected] www.naturalistjourneys.com or find us on Facebook at Naturalist Journeys, LLC Naturalist Journeys, LLC | Caligo Ventures PO Box 16545 Portal, AZ 85632 PH: 520.558.1146 | 866.900.1146 Fax 650.471.7667 naturalistjourneys.com | caligo.com [email protected] | [email protected] Tour Summary Tour Highlights 8-Day / 7-Night Colorado Birding Tour • UNPLUG! Be inspired as you bird—this remote With Ted Floyd & Pat Lueders location gives a sense of unlimited space and quiet, $3995, from Western City of Your Choice so rare in today’s world (see travel details) • Visit wildlife refuges to find Western Grebe, White- faced ibis, Cinnamon Teal, Yellow-headed Blackbird, NEW! Join Naturalist Journeys’ first celebrity Virginia Rail, and Black-crowned Night-Heron tour with renowned birder and author Ted • Watch Great Horned Owl fledglings learn about life Floyd. Ted is widely known as the editor of the in the grand cottonwood trees that surround the American Birding Association’s magazine ranch and look for Elk with their young in the sage Birding. Ted has authored several books and is • See Common Nighthawk display at dusk, listen to a familiar to many having been the k eynote chorus of Coyote song, then marvel at stars so speaker at a variety of birding festivals. This brilliant in the dark skies exciting new Naturalist Journeys’ tour invites • Enjoy an optional, gentle horseback ride with you to spend a week with Ted to explore the stunning views; enjoy western meals, perhaps some San Luis Valley in southern Colorado from The music and fun (experienced riders can request more Nature Conservancy’s Zapata Ranch.
    [Show full text]
  • Physiographic Subdivisions of the San Luis Valley, Southern Colorado
    113 PHYSIOGRAPHIC SUBDIVISIONS OF THE SAN LUIS VALLEY, SOUTHERN COLORADO by J. E. UPsolvf University of Idaho Moscow, Idaho EDITOR'S NOTE: The New Mexico Geological Society v is grateful to the Journal of Geology for permission to re- print this classic article. After 32 years the work still re- WVO. • mains the most quoted reference in its field on the basin. AP.. _ AC . I The photographs were retaken under Mr. Upson's direc- / tion and duplicate the originals as closely as possible, with –rt 1 the exception of Figure 5, which was taken a short distance ,0 "north" of the mouth of the Rio Costilla. Slight editorial /y .R changes in punctuation and capitalization were made on p 3, the article to conform to present day usage. Denver 70 0 0) INTRODUCTION 3 , CID The San Luis Valley, forming the upper end of the u) great valley of the Rio Grande, is one of the most impres- sive topographic features of southern Colorado. As orig- inally outlined by Siebenthal, 1 it is a great lowland about 150 miles long and 50 miles in maximum width, flanked on the east by the linear Sangre dc Cristo Range and on 0 7/, / the west by the eastern portion of the more extensive San 3 0 0N405 Juan Mountains. It is, in a sense, part of the chain of in- t4 •O 4. SP O V4 / termontane basins, or parks,2 lying west of the Southern ` 1,1‘0 AN Rocky Mountain front ranges, but is unlike the others in Llt IS q` having no southern mountain border.
    [Show full text]
  • Colorado Council of Amateur Radio Clubs Spring Meeting 16 May 2020
    Colorado Council of Amateur Radio Clubs P.O. Box 24244 Denver, CO 80224-0244 http://www.ccarc.net Spring Meeting 16 May 2020 v1 (via virtual Zoom meeting) Meeting was called to order by President Doug Nielsen (N7LEM) at 1300hrs. Introductions (See attached Delegate List] Secretary’s Report & Approval of Minutes from Fall 2019 [posted on CCARC website] o Several changes were proposed and accepted to the fall meeting of Oct 12, 2019. Meeting minutes will be updated and published. o Discussion followed on the Special meeting of Oct 27 2019. Meeting minutes showed “Agenda” rather than “Minutes”, change will be made and republished. Motion to accept Gerry (W0GV), seconded by Tony Ferris (NA0US) . Motion was passed with one objection. Treasurer’s Report [See attached] o Four clubs submitted application to become members of CCARC . San Luis Valley Amateur Radio Association . Eastern Colorado DX Assn . Fun Machine Linked Repeater System . Radops of El Jebel o Wayne made motion to accept each club individually. Motions were seconded and approved. Frequency Coordinator’s Report (See attached) o Repeater Database o Backlog status o Proposed repeater decoordination was discussed for: . 586 KD0NDG 448.9500 Grand Junction . 602 AC0AU 147.1500 Lamar . 647 KD0LXQ 147.3750 Wildhorse . 232 WX5R 447.4250 Divide . 469 KC0FNE 447.3500 Greeley . 193 W0RM 224.600 Rollinsville . 370 WA0VTO 449.8500 Pueblo o Annual update/on air reminders by mail Colorado Council of Amateur Radio Clubs P.O. Box 24244 Denver, CO 80224-0244 http://www.ccarc.net . Comment and online database was explained by Willem (AC0KQ). Old Business: o ◦ Repeater Maps .
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3 of the State Wildlife Action Plan
    Colorado’s 2015 State Wildlife Action Plan Chapter 3: Habitats This chapter presents updated information on the distribution and condition of key habitats in Colorado. The habitat component of Colorado’s 2006 SWAP considered 41 land cover types from the Colorado GAP Analysis (Schrupp et al. 2000). Since then, the Southwest Regional GAP project (SWReGAP, USGS 2004) has produced updated land cover mapping using the U.S. National Vegetation Classification (NVC) names for terrestrial ecological systems. In the strictest sense, ecological systems are not equivalent to habitat types for wildlife. Ecological systems as defined in the NVC include both dynamic ecological processes and biogeophysical characteristics, in addition to the component species. However, the ecological systems as currently classified and mapped are closely aligned with the ways in which Colorado’s wildlife managers and conservation professionals think of, and manage for, habitats. Thus, for the purposes of the SWAP, references to the NVC systems should be interpreted as wildlife habitat in the general sense. Fifty-seven terrestrial ecological systems or altered land cover types mapped for SWReGAP have been categorized into 20 habitat types, and an additional nine aquatic habitats and seven “Other” habitat categories have been defined. SWAP habitat categories are listed in Table 4 (see Appendix C for the crosswalk of SWAP habitats with SWReGAP mapping units). Though nomenclature is slightly different in some cases, the revised habitat categories presented in this document
    [Show full text]
  • Rio Grande and Conejos Counties, Colorado Volume II: a Natural Heritage Inventory and Assessment of Wetlands and Riparian Areas in Rio Grande and Conejos Counties
    Biological Inventory of Rio Grande and Conejos Counties, Colorado Volume II: A Natural Heritage Inventory and Assessment of Wetlands and Riparian Areas in Rio Grande and Conejos Counties Colorado Natural Heritage Program College of Natural Resources, 254 General Services Building Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado 80523 Biological Inventory of Rio Grande and Conejos Counties, Colorado Volume II: A Natural Heritage Inventory and Assessment of Wetlands and Riparian Areas in Rio Grande and Conejos Counties Prepared for: Colorado Department of Natural Resources 1313 Sherman Street Room 718 Denver, Colorado 80203 Prepared by: Joe Rocchio, Denise Culver, Steve Kettler, and Robert Schorr March 2000 Colorado Natural Heritage Program College of Natural Resources 254 General Services Building Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado 80523 ii USER’S GUIDE The Biological Inventory of Rio Grande and Conejos Counties, conducted by the Colorado Natural Heritage Program, consists of two essentially distinct projects that are highly integrated with respect to methodology and fieldwork. This report reflects the separate nature of the projects by being organized in a two-volume set. Both projects utilized the same Natural Heritage methodology that is used throughout North America, and both searched for and assessed the plants, animals, and plant communities on the Colorado Natural Heritage Program’s list of rare and imperiled elements of biodiversity. Each volume prioritizes potential conservation areas based on the relative significance of the biodiversity they support and the urgency for protection of the site. All information explaining Natural Heritage methodology and ranks is repeated in each volume, so that each volume can stand-alone and be used independently of the other.
    [Show full text]
  • Sangre De Cristo Salida and San Carlos Wet Mountains San Carlos Spanish Peaks San Carlos
    Wild Connections Conservation Plan for the Pike & San Isabel National Forests Chapter 5 – Complexes: Area-Specific Management Recommendations This section contains our detailed, area-specific proposal utilizing the theme based approach to land management. As an organizational tool, this proposal divides the Pike-San Isabel National Forest into eleven separate Complexes, based on geo-physical characteristics of the land such as mountain ranges, parklands, or canyon systems. Each complex narrative provides details and justifications for our management recommendations for specific areas. In order to emphasize the larger landscape and connectivity of these lands with the ecoregion, commentary on relationships to adjacent non-Forest lands are also included. Evaluations of ecological value across public and private lands are used throughout this chapter. The Colorado Natural Heritage Programs rates the biodiversity of Potential Conservation Areas (PCAs) as General Biodiversity, Moderate, High, Very High, and Outranking Significance. The Nature Conservancy assesses the conservation value of its Conservation Blueprint areas as Low, Moderately Low, Moderate, Moderately High and High. The Southern Rockies Ecosystem Project's Wildlands Network Vision recommends land use designations of Core Wilderness, Core Agency, Low and Moderate Compatible Use, and Wildlife Linkages. Detailed explanations are available from the respective organizations. Complexes – Summary List by Watershed Table 5.1: Summary of WCCP Complexes Watershed Complex Ranger District
    [Show full text]
  • Late Mesozoic to Cenozoic Cooling Histories of the Flanks of the Northern and Central Rio Grande Rift, Colorado and New Mexico
    New Mexico Bureau of Mines & Mineral Resources A DIVISION OF NEW MEXICO INSTITUTE OF MINING & TECHNOLOGY Late Mesozoic to Cenozoic cooling histories of the flanks of the northern and central Rio Grande rift, Colorado and New Mexico Shari A. Kelley1, Charles E. Chapin2, and Jeff Corrigan3 1Department of Geological Sciences, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, Texas 75275; 2New Mexico Bureau of Mines & Mineral Resources, Socorro, New Mexico 87801; 3ARCO Oil and Gas Company, Plano, Texas 75075 SOCORRO 1992 11 NEW MEXICO INSTITUTE OF MINING & TECHNOLOGY Laurence H. Lattman, President NEW MEXICO BUREAU OF MINES & MINERAL RESOURCES Charles E. Chapin, Director and State Geologist BOARD OF REGENTS Ex Officio Bruce King, Governor of New Mexico Alan Morgan, Superintendent of Public Instruction Appointed Lt. Gen. Leo Marquez, President, 1989-1995, Albuquerque Charles Zimmerly, Secretary/Treasurer, 1991-1997, Socorro Diane D. Denish, 1992-1997, Albuquerque J. Michael Kelly, 1992-1997, Roswell Steve Torres, 1991-1997, Albuquerque BUREAU STAFF ORIN J. ANDERSON, Senior Geologist DEBBIE GOERING, Staff Secretary VIRGINIA McLesion, Economic Geologist RUBEN ARCHULETA, Metallurgical Lab. Tech. Lois GOLLMER, Geotechnical Records Clerk NORMA J. MEEKS, Director of Publications Office Augustus K. ARMSTRONG, USGS Geologist IBRAHIM GUNDILER, Senior Metallurgist BARBARA R. Popp, Chemical lab. Tech. II GEORGE S. AusTIN, Senior Industrial Minerals Geologist STEVE HAASE, Ground-Water Geologist MARSHALL A. REITER, Senior Geophysicist AL BACA, Maintenance Carpenter II WILLIAM C. HANEBERG, Engineering Geologist JACQUES R. RENAULT, Senior Geologist JAMES M. BARKER, Senior Industrial Minerals Geologist JOHN W. HAWLEY, Senior Env. Geologist JAMES M. ROBERTSON, Senior Economic Geologist PAUL W. BAUER, Field Economic Geologist LYNNE HEMENWAY, Computer Pub./Graphics Spec.
    [Show full text]
  • Visitor Guide and Preserve Web Version
    Great Sand Dunes National Park Visitor Guide and Preserve Web Version Welcome to one of the world’s most diverse national parks! Golden cottonwood and aspen trees color the Montville Trail each fall. Inset photos, from left: Check out a dunes wheelchair at the Visitor Center (see page 2 for more accessible options); Medano Creek provides a natural beach environment for all ages in spring; Lower Sand Creek Lake in mid-summer offers an experience quite different from the dunes. 2-3 4-5 6 Getting Exploring Natural Started Your Park Wonders ¡Bienvenidos! Suggested trails, Other nearby San Luis Valley features Information you’ll destinations, and time including Zapata need to prepare for planning for your trip. Falls, Blanca Peak, your visit. Facilities, Color map, photos, South Zapata Lake, camping, programs, distances, and national wildlife and local services. average travel times refuges, and nearby Información en are included. wetlands. español, página 2. For Your Safety Weather The weather changes rapidly at Great Sand Dunes; be prepared! Storms and cold temperatures can occur any time of year. If you see a thunderstorm approaching, get off the dunes immediately. Lightning strikes can be fatal. For general weather information, see page 2. Hot Sand On summer afternoons, the sand surface can reach 140°F (60° C). Bring closed shoes, and be careful with your pets’ feet. Hike the dunes early morning or evening during summer. Although the sand surface can become hot, summer daytime highs are typically in the low 80s F (upper 20s C). Wildlife Never feed wild animals. It is unhealthy for them, and dangerous to you.
    [Show full text]
  • Significant Natural Heritage Resources
    A Biological Inventory and Conservation Recommendations for the Great Sand Dunes and San Luis Lakes, Colorado Colorado Natural Heritage Program Colorado State University College of Natural Resources 254 General Services Building Ft. Collins, Colorado 80523 March 1999 i A Biological Inventory and Conservation Recommendations for the Great Sand Dunes and San Luis Lakes, Colorado MARCH 1999 PREPARED BY: PHYLLIS M. PINEDA RENÉE J. RONDEAU AND ANNE OCHS PREPARED FOR: THE NATURE CONSERVANCY, SAN LUIS VALLEY PROGRAM† SAGUACHE, COLORADO †P.O. Box 674, Saguache, Colorado 81149 ii Biological Inventory of the Great Sand Dunes and San Luis Lakes. Pineda et al. 1999 __________________________________________________________________________________ TABLE OF CONTENTS USERS GUIDE/BACKGROUND INFORMATION .............................................................................. IV GLOSSARY................................................................................................................................................ IV ACKNOWLEDGMENTS............................................................................................................................V EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................................................ 3 STUDY AREA .............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]