181231 Fy19-20 Master Summary.Xlsx

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

181231 Fy19-20 Master Summary.Xlsx School District, Colorado School for the Deaf and Blind, BOCES, Charter School, Charter School Institute, FY19-20 Minimum Match Percentages DISTRICT, BOCES, CHARTER SCHOOL OR SCHOOL BEST FY2019‐20 ADJUSTED COUNTY FOR THE DEAF AND THE BLIND MINIMUM MATCH % ADAMS MAPLETON 1 27% ADAMS ADAMS 12 FIVE STAR SCHOOLS 42% ADAMS ADAMS COUNTY 14 45% ADAMS SCHOOL DISTRICT 27J 45% ADAMS BENNETT 29J 61% ADAMS STRASBURG 31J 62% ADAMS WESTMINSTER PUBLIC SCHOOLS 45% ALAMOSA ALAMOSA RE‐11J 29% ALAMOSA SANGRE DE CRISTO RE‐22J 30% ARAPAHOE ENGLEWOOD 1 31% ARAPAHOE SHERIDAN 2 37% ARAPAHOE CHERRY CREEK 5 73% ARAPAHOE LITTLETON 6 57% ARAPAHOE DEER TRAIL 26J 27% ARAPAHOE ADAMS‐ARAPAHOE 28J 43% ARAPAHOE BYERS 32J 59% ARCHULETA ARCHULETA COUNTY 50 JT 63% BACA WALSH RE‐1 49% BACA PRITCHETT RE‐3 41% BACA SPRINGFIELD RE‐4 41% BACA VILAS RE‐5 34% BACA CAMPO RE‐6 33% BENT LAS ANIMAS RE‐1 34% BENT MC CLAVE RE‐2 53% BOULDER ST VRAIN VALLEY RE 1J 68% BOULDER BOULDER VALLEY RE 2 80% CHAFFEE BUENA VISTA R‐31 52% CHAFFEE SALIDA R‐32 55% CHEYENNE KIT CARSON R‐1 54% CHEYENNE CHEYENNE COUNTY RE‐5 64% CLEAR CREEK CLEAR CREEK RE‐1 61% CONEJOS NORTH CONEJOS RE‐1J 49% CONEJOS SANFORD 6J 16% CONEJOS SOUTH CONEJOS RE‐10 12% COSTILLA CENTENNIAL R‐1 23% COSTILLA SIERRA GRANDE R‐30 27% CROWLEY CROWLEY COUNTY RE‐1‐J 39% CUSTER CUSTER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT C‐1 40% DELTA DELTA COUNTY 50(J) 52% DENVER DENVER COUNTY 1 59% DOLORES DOLORES COUNTY RE NO.2 44% DOUGLAS DOUGLAS COUNTY RE 1 80% EAGLE EAGLE COUNTY RE 50 75% ELBERT ELIZABETH C‐1 68% ELBERT KIOWA C‐2 68% ELBERT BIG SANDY 100J 30% ELBERT ELBERT 200 45% Division of Capital Construciton Assistance BEST FY19-20 School District, Colorado School for the Deaf and Blind, BOCES, Charter School, Charter School Institute, FY19-20 Minimum Match Percentages DISTRICT, BOCES, CHARTER SCHOOL OR SCHOOL BEST FY2019‐20 ADJUSTED COUNTY FOR THE DEAF AND THE BLIND MINIMUM MATCH % ELBERT AGATE 300 46% EL PASO CALHAN RJ‐1 56% EL PASO HARRISON 2 31% EL PASO WIDEFIELD 3 59% EL PASO FOUNTAIN 8 65% EL PASO COLORADO SPRINGS 11 64% EL PASO CHEYENNE MOUNTAIN 12 68% EL PASO MANITOU SPRINGS 14 66% EL PASO ACADEMY 20 70% EL PASO ELLICOTT 22 28% EL PASO PEYTON 23 JT 53% EL PASO HANOVER 28 19% EL PASO LEWIS‐PALMER 38 68% EL PASO FALCON 49 85% EL PASO EDISON 54 JT 29% EL PASO MIAMI/YODER 60 JT 39% FREMONT CANON CITY RE‐1 36% FREMONT FREMONT RE‐2 40% FREMONT COTOPAXI RE‐3 52% GARFIELD ROARING FORK RE‐1 59% GARFIELD GARFIELD RE‐2 58% GARFIELD GARFIELD 16 54% GILPIN GILPIN COUNTY RE‐1 86% GRAND WEST GRAND 1‐JT 53% GRAND EAST GRAND 2 73% GUNNISON GUNNISON WATERSHED RE1J 59% HINSDALE HINSDALE COUNTY RE 1 53% HUERFANO HUERFANO RE‐1 38% HUERFANO LA VETA RE‐2 27% JACKSON NORTH PARK R‐1 52% JEFFERSON JEFFERSON COUNTY R‐1 79% KIOWA EADS RE‐1 47% KIOWA PLAINVIEW RE‐2 40% KIT CARSON ARRIBA‐FLAGLER C‐20 50% KIT CARSON HI‐PLAINS R‐23 29% KIT CARSON STRATTON R‐4 41% KIT CARSON BETHUNE R‐5 38% KIT CARSON BURLINGTON RE‐6J 55% LAKE LAKE COUNTY R‐1 47% LA PLATA DURANGO 9‐R 71% LA PLATA BAYFIELD 10 JT‐R 48% LA PLATA IGNACIO 11 JT 46% LARIMER POUDRE R‐1 68% LARIMER THOMPSON R2‐J 72% LARIMER ESTES PARK R‐3 66% LAS ANIMAS TRINIDAD 1 34% LAS ANIMAS PRIMERO REORGANIZED 2 40% Division of Capital Construciton Assistance BEST FY19-20 School District, Colorado School for the Deaf and Blind, BOCES, Charter School, Charter School Institute, FY19-20 Minimum Match Percentages DISTRICT, BOCES, CHARTER SCHOOL OR SCHOOL BEST FY2019‐20 ADJUSTED COUNTY FOR THE DEAF AND THE BLIND MINIMUM MATCH % LAS ANIMAS HOEHNE REORGANIZED 3 64% LAS ANIMAS AGUILAR REORGANIZED 6 33% LAS ANIMAS BRANSON REORGANIZED 82 50% LAS ANIMAS KIM REORGANIZED 88 29% LINCOLN GENOA‐HUGO C113 50% LINCOLN LIMON RE‐4J 38% LINCOLN KARVAL RE‐23 37% LOGAN VALLEY RE‐1 36% LOGAN FRENCHMAN RE‐3 53% LOGAN BUFFALO RE‐4J 43% LOGAN PLATEAU RE‐5 66% MESA DE BEQUE 49JT 56% MESA PLATEAU VALLEY 50 71% MESA MESA COUNTY VALLEY 51 57% MINERAL CREEDE SCHOOL DISTRICT 29% MOFFAT MOFFAT COUNTY RE:NO 1 64% MONTEZUMA MONTEZUMA‐CORTEZ RE‐1 39% MONTEZUMA DOLORES RE‐4A 53% MONTEZUMA MANCOS RE‐6 51% MONTROSE MONTROSE COUNTY RE‐1J 62% MONTROSE WEST END RE‐2 45% MORGAN BRUSH RE‐2(J) 46% MORGAN FORT MORGAN RE‐3 40% MORGAN WELDON VALLEY RE‐20(J) 46% MORGAN WIGGINS RE‐50(J) 35% OTERO EAST OTERO R‐1 36% OTERO ROCKY FORD R‐2 42% OTERO MANZANOLA 3J 31% OTERO FOWLER R‐4J 31% OTERO CHERAW 31 39% OTERO SWINK 33 39% OURAY OURAY R‐1 55% OURAY RIDGWAY R‐2 54% PARK PLATTE CANYON 1 62% PARK PARK COUNTY RE‐2 62% PHILLIPS HOLYOKE RE‐1J 51% PHILLIPS HAXTUN RE‐2J 37% PITKIN ASPEN 1 86% PROWERS GRANADA RE‐1 41% PROWERS LAMAR RE‐2 50% PROWERS HOLLY RE‐3 26% PROWERS WILEY RE‐13 JT 52% PUEBLO PUEBLO CITY 60 44% PUEBLO PUEBLO COUNTY 70 57% RIO BLANCO MEEKER RE1 69% RIO BLANCO RANGELY RE‐4 67% RIO GRANDE DEL NORTE C‐7 27% Division of Capital Construciton Assistance BEST FY19-20 School District, Colorado School for the Deaf and Blind, BOCES, Charter School, Charter School Institute, FY19-20 Minimum Match Percentages DISTRICT, BOCES, CHARTER SCHOOL OR SCHOOL BEST FY2019‐20 ADJUSTED COUNTY FOR THE DEAF AND THE BLIND MINIMUM MATCH % RIO GRANDE MONTE VISTA C‐8 25% RIO GRANDE SARGENT RE‐33J 35% ROUTT HAYDEN RE‐1 59% ROUTT STEAMBOAT SPRINGS RE‐2 76% ROUTT SOUTH ROUTT RE 3 44% SAGUACHE MOUNTAIN VALLEY RE 1 11% SAGUACHE MOFFAT 2 13% SAGUACHE CENTER 26 JT 9% SAN JUAN SILVERTON 1 38% SAN MIGUEL TELLURIDE R‐1 66% SAN MIGUEL NORWOOD R‐2J 44% SEDGWICK JULESBURG RE‐1 61% SEDGWICK REVERE SCHOOL DISTRICT 40% SUMMIT SUMMIT RE‐1 80% TELLER CRIPPLE CREEK‐VICTOR RE‐1 53% TELLER WOODLAND PARK RE‐2 83% WASHINGTON AKRON R‐1 27% WASHINGTON ARICKAREE R‐2 55% WASHINGTON OTIS R‐3 24% WASHINGTON LONE STAR 101 51% WASHINGTON WOODLIN R‐104 58% WELD WELD COUNTY RE‐1 63% WELD EATON RE‐2 76% WELD WELD COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT RE‐3J 72% WELD WINDSOR RE‐4 69% WELD JOHNSTOWN‐MILLIKEN RE‐5J 75% WELD GREELEY 6 55% WELD PLATTE VALLEY RE‐7 75% WELD WELD COUNTY S/D RE‐8 59% WELD AULT‐HIGHLAND RE‐9 61% WELD BRIGGSDALE RE‐10 66% WELD PRAIRIE RE‐11 74% WELD PAWNEE RE‐12 52% YUMA YUMA 1 46% YUMA WRAY RD‐2 35% YUMA IDALIA RJ‐3 29% YUMA LIBERTY J‐4 49% CSDB Colorado School for the Deaf and the Blind 64% Division of Capital Construciton Assistance BEST FY19-20 School District, Colorado School for the Deaf and Blind, BOCES, Charter School, Charter School Institute, FY19-20 Minimum Match Percentages DISTRICT, BOCES, CHARTER SCHOOL OR SCHOOL BEST FY2019‐20 ADJUSTED COUNTY FOR THE DEAF AND THE BLIND MINIMUM MATCH % BOCES ADAMS COUNTY BOCES 39% BOCES CENTENNIAL BOCES 56% BOCES EAST CENTRAL BOCES 49% BOCES EXPEDITIONARY BOCES 63% BOCES FRONT RANGE BOCES 57% BOCES GRAND VALLEY BOCES 59% BOCES MOUNTAIN BOCES 54% BOCES NORTHWEST COLORADO BOCES 60% BOCES PIKES PEAK BOCES 38% BOCES SAN JUAN BOCES 50% BOCES SAN LUIS VALLEY BOCES 24% BOCES SOUTH CENTRAL BOCES 42% Pursuant to 22‐5‐114(2) C.R.S., Unless otherwise approved by the state board, to be eligible to receive state funds under this section and under section 22‐5‐118, a board of cooperative services shall meet all the following criteria: (a) It shall serve school districts with a combined total enrollment of not less than four thousand students; and (b) It shall either serve school districts in two or more counties or serve multiple school districts located in the same county. Division of Capital Construciton Assistance BEST FY19-20 School District, Colorado School for the Deaf and Blind, BOCES, Charter School, Charter School Institute, FY19-20 Minimum Match Percentages DISTRICT, BOCES, CHARTER SCHOOL OR SCHOOL BEST FY2019‐20 ADJUSTED COUNTY FOR THE DEAF AND THE BLIND MINIMUM MATCH % BOULDER VALLEY RE 2 JUSTICE HIGH SCHOOL 66% CANON CITY RE‐1 MOUNTAIN VIEW CORE KNOWLEDGE 34% CHEYENNE MOUNTAIN 12 THE VANGUARD SCHOOL 53% CSI GLOBAL VILLAGE ACADEMY ‐ NORTHGLENN 22% CSI RICARDO FLORES MAGON ACADEMY 19% CSI THOMAS MACLAREN STATE CHARTER SCHOOL 21% GREELEY 6 FRONTIER ACADEMY 48% HARRISON 2 ATLAS PREPARATORY 42% MONTEZUMA‐CORTEZ RE‐1 CHILDREN'S KIVA MONTESSORI 28% PUEBLO CITY 60 CHAVEZ HUERTA K‐12 PREP ACADEMY 38% PUEBLO COUNTY 70 SWALLOWS CHARTER ACADEMY 39% Pursuant to 22‐43.7‐103(7) C.R.S., an eligible Charter school for BEST financial assistance means a charter school as described in section 22‐54‐ 124(1)(f.6)(I)(A) or (1)(f.6)(I)(B) and which has been in existence for at least three years at the time the application is submitted as pursuant to 22‐43.7‐109(b) C.R.S. This list only reflects eligible charter schools and institute charter schools. A charter school intending to apply for BEST financial assistance must notify the Division of Capital Construction of its intentions by November 30, 2018 in order to apply. The Division must collect data from a charter school wishing to apply in order to generate a match percentage for the charter school.
Recommended publications
  • San Luis Valley Conservation Area EA and LPP EA Chapter 3
    Chapter 3 — Affected Environment This chapter describes the biological, cultural, and on the eastern side of the valley floor, the Oligocene socioeconomic resources of the SLVCA that could be volcanic rocks of the San Juan Mountains dip gently affected by the no-action alternative (alternative A) eastward into the valley floor, where they are inter- and the proposed action (alternative B). The SLVCA bedded with valley-fill deposits. Valley-fill deposits consists of 5.2 million acres within the Southern Rock- consist of sedimentary rocks that inter-finger with ies and Arizona/New Mexico Plateau ecoregions (U.S. volcanic deposits. Quaternary deposits include pedi- Environmental Protection Agency 2011). The project ments along the mountain fronts, alluvium, and sand encompasses significant portions of seven counties in dunes (USFWS 2011). southern Colorado as well as small parts of two coun- ties in northern New Mexico. Just over 50 percent of MINERALS the total project area is publicly owned; however, the Sand and gravel are the major mineral commodities distribution of public/private ownership is uneven, with mined in the vicinity of the San Luis Valley. Rock, over 90 percent of Mineral County administered by sand, and gravel mines are scattered throughout the the USFS, but less than 1 percent of Costilla County valley, but are concentrated around the cities of Ala- in State or Federal ownership. The project boundary mosa and Monte Vista and the town of Del Norte, is defined by the headwaters hydrologic unit (HUC Colorado. No coal mining permits are active in the 6) of the Rio Grande. SLVCA (Colorado Division of Reclamation, Mining, Because of the nearly 7,000 feet in elevation change and Safety 2012).
    [Show full text]
  • San Luis Valley Conservation Area Land Protection Plan, Colorado And
    Land Protection Plan San Luis Valley Conservation Area Colorado and New Mexico December 2015 Prepared by San Luis Valley National Wildlife Refuge Complex 8249 Emperius Road Alamosa, CO 81101 719 / 589 4021 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 6, Mountain-Prairie Region Branch of Refuge Planning 134 Union Boulevard, Suite 300 Lakewood, CO 80228 303 / 236 8145 CITATION for this document: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2015. Land protection plan for the San Luis Valley Conservation Area. Lakewood, CO: U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 151 p. In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service policy, an environmental assessment and land protection plan have been prepared to analyze the effects of establishing the San Luis Valley Conservation Area in southern Colorado and northern New Mexico. The environmental assessment (appendix A) analyzes the environmental effects of establishing the San Luis Valley Conservation Area. The San Luis Valley Conservation Area land protection plan describes the priorities for acquiring up to 250,000 acres through voluntary conservation easements and up to 30,000 acres in fee title. Note: Information contained in the maps is approximate and does not represent a legal survey. Ownership information may not be complete. Contents Abbreviations . vii Chapter 1—Introduction and Project Description . 1 Purpose of the San Luis Valley Conservation Area . 2 Vision for the San Luis Valley National Wildlife Refuge Complex . 4 Purpose of the Alamosa and Monte Vista National Wildlife Refuges . 4 Purpose of the Baca national wildlife refuge . 4 Purpose of the Sangre de Cristo Conservation Area .
    [Show full text]
  • INDEX a COLORADO COLLEGE READER Page 274 Abbott
    INDEX INDEX Abbott Academy, 83 Armstrong Hall, 190, 245, 259, Acacia Park, 33 263 Academic Program Committee, Army Signal Corps, 252 181, 189 Arnold Fairyland Doll Store, 112 Africa, 180 Art Nouveau, 115, 117 Ahlberg Adventure Program, 234 Ashland, MA, 36, 55, 58, 60, 61 Ahlberg, Jerry, 234 Ashley, Susan, 271-272 Ahlberg Outdoor Education Aspen, CO, 225 Center, 234 Aspen Institute, 229 Ahlers, Mrs., 98 Aspen Ski Patrol, 221 Albright, Guy, 204 Associated Charities (Baltimore, Albright, Horace, 214 MD), 85 Albuquerque, NM, 19, 37, 62 Associated Students of Colorado Alexander, John, 220 College, 262 Alpha Lambda Delta, 262 Associated Women Students, 262 Amesbury, MA, 39, 83, 84 Avon Pottery Company, American Alpine Club, 214 113 American Alpine Journal, 218 Ayuda, 265-267 American Art Association, 115 “American College,” 75, 86, 89 Baca Campus, 229-230 American College and Education Baltimore, MD, 83, 85 Society, 48, 60 Barbetts, 258 American Political Science Bartlett, Enoch N., 13, 15, 17, 24, Association (APSA), 171 36, 55, 58, 60, 61 “America the Beautiful,” 244 Barton, Ruth, 271 Amherst College, 15, 21, 75, Bates, Katherine Lee, 244 76-81, 89, 92 Baxter, James Phinney, 194-195 Andover-Newton Theological Bennan, Professor, 19 Seminary, 82 Baby Boomers, 262, 265 Andover Theological Seminary, Bangor seminary, 70 39, 81, 82 Bangs, Harry, 122, 127 Appolonian Club, 250 Belschner, Martha, 256 A COLORADO COLLEGE READER Page 274 INDEX Bemis Hall, 101, 105-106, 136, Bramhall, Edith C., 163-177, 256 137, 141, 247, 254, 257, “Brammy,” 171, 175 261, 262 Braun photograph, 101 Bemis, Samuel Flagg, 194-195 Bristol, R.
    [Show full text]
  • Minerals of the San Luis Valley and Adjacent Areas of Colorado Charles F
    New Mexico Geological Society Downloaded from: http://nmgs.nmt.edu/publications/guidebooks/22 Minerals of the San Luis Valley and adjacent areas of Colorado Charles F. Bauer, 1971, pp. 231-234 in: San Luis Basin (Colorado), James, H. L.; [ed.], New Mexico Geological Society 22nd Annual Fall Field Conference Guidebook, 340 p. This is one of many related papers that were included in the 1971 NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebook. Annual NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebooks Every fall since 1950, the New Mexico Geological Society (NMGS) has held an annual Fall Field Conference that explores some region of New Mexico (or surrounding states). Always well attended, these conferences provide a guidebook to participants. Besides detailed road logs, the guidebooks contain many well written, edited, and peer-reviewed geoscience papers. These books have set the national standard for geologic guidebooks and are an essential geologic reference for anyone working in or around New Mexico. Free Downloads NMGS has decided to make peer-reviewed papers from our Fall Field Conference guidebooks available for free download. Non-members will have access to guidebook papers two years after publication. Members have access to all papers. This is in keeping with our mission of promoting interest, research, and cooperation regarding geology in New Mexico. However, guidebook sales represent a significant proportion of our operating budget. Therefore, only research papers are available for download. Road logs, mini-papers, maps, stratigraphic charts, and other selected content are available only in the printed guidebooks. Copyright Information Publications of the New Mexico Geological Society, printed and electronic, are protected by the copyright laws of the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Physiographic Subdivisions of the San Luis Valley, Southern Colorado
    113 PHYSIOGRAPHIC SUBDIVISIONS OF THE SAN LUIS VALLEY, SOUTHERN COLORADO by J. E. UPsolvf University of Idaho Moscow, Idaho EDITOR'S NOTE: The New Mexico Geological Society v is grateful to the Journal of Geology for permission to re- print this classic article. After 32 years the work still re- WVO. • mains the most quoted reference in its field on the basin. AP.. _ AC . I The photographs were retaken under Mr. Upson's direc- / tion and duplicate the originals as closely as possible, with –rt 1 the exception of Figure 5, which was taken a short distance ,0 "north" of the mouth of the Rio Costilla. Slight editorial /y .R changes in punctuation and capitalization were made on p 3, the article to conform to present day usage. Denver 70 0 0) INTRODUCTION 3 , CID The San Luis Valley, forming the upper end of the u) great valley of the Rio Grande, is one of the most impres- sive topographic features of southern Colorado. As orig- inally outlined by Siebenthal, 1 it is a great lowland about 150 miles long and 50 miles in maximum width, flanked on the east by the linear Sangre dc Cristo Range and on 0 7/, / the west by the eastern portion of the more extensive San 3 0 0N405 Juan Mountains. It is, in a sense, part of the chain of in- t4 •O 4. SP O V4 / termontane basins, or parks,2 lying west of the Southern ` 1,1‘0 AN Rocky Mountain front ranges, but is unlike the others in Llt IS q` having no southern mountain border.
    [Show full text]
  • Colorado Council of Amateur Radio Clubs Spring Meeting 16 May 2020
    Colorado Council of Amateur Radio Clubs P.O. Box 24244 Denver, CO 80224-0244 http://www.ccarc.net Spring Meeting 16 May 2020 v1 (via virtual Zoom meeting) Meeting was called to order by President Doug Nielsen (N7LEM) at 1300hrs. Introductions (See attached Delegate List] Secretary’s Report & Approval of Minutes from Fall 2019 [posted on CCARC website] o Several changes were proposed and accepted to the fall meeting of Oct 12, 2019. Meeting minutes will be updated and published. o Discussion followed on the Special meeting of Oct 27 2019. Meeting minutes showed “Agenda” rather than “Minutes”, change will be made and republished. Motion to accept Gerry (W0GV), seconded by Tony Ferris (NA0US) . Motion was passed with one objection. Treasurer’s Report [See attached] o Four clubs submitted application to become members of CCARC . San Luis Valley Amateur Radio Association . Eastern Colorado DX Assn . Fun Machine Linked Repeater System . Radops of El Jebel o Wayne made motion to accept each club individually. Motions were seconded and approved. Frequency Coordinator’s Report (See attached) o Repeater Database o Backlog status o Proposed repeater decoordination was discussed for: . 586 KD0NDG 448.9500 Grand Junction . 602 AC0AU 147.1500 Lamar . 647 KD0LXQ 147.3750 Wildhorse . 232 WX5R 447.4250 Divide . 469 KC0FNE 447.3500 Greeley . 193 W0RM 224.600 Rollinsville . 370 WA0VTO 449.8500 Pueblo o Annual update/on air reminders by mail Colorado Council of Amateur Radio Clubs P.O. Box 24244 Denver, CO 80224-0244 http://www.ccarc.net . Comment and online database was explained by Willem (AC0KQ). Old Business: o ◦ Repeater Maps .
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3 of the State Wildlife Action Plan
    Colorado’s 2015 State Wildlife Action Plan Chapter 3: Habitats This chapter presents updated information on the distribution and condition of key habitats in Colorado. The habitat component of Colorado’s 2006 SWAP considered 41 land cover types from the Colorado GAP Analysis (Schrupp et al. 2000). Since then, the Southwest Regional GAP project (SWReGAP, USGS 2004) has produced updated land cover mapping using the U.S. National Vegetation Classification (NVC) names for terrestrial ecological systems. In the strictest sense, ecological systems are not equivalent to habitat types for wildlife. Ecological systems as defined in the NVC include both dynamic ecological processes and biogeophysical characteristics, in addition to the component species. However, the ecological systems as currently classified and mapped are closely aligned with the ways in which Colorado’s wildlife managers and conservation professionals think of, and manage for, habitats. Thus, for the purposes of the SWAP, references to the NVC systems should be interpreted as wildlife habitat in the general sense. Fifty-seven terrestrial ecological systems or altered land cover types mapped for SWReGAP have been categorized into 20 habitat types, and an additional nine aquatic habitats and seven “Other” habitat categories have been defined. SWAP habitat categories are listed in Table 4 (see Appendix C for the crosswalk of SWAP habitats with SWReGAP mapping units). Though nomenclature is slightly different in some cases, the revised habitat categories presented in this document
    [Show full text]
  • Rio Grande and Conejos Counties, Colorado Volume II: a Natural Heritage Inventory and Assessment of Wetlands and Riparian Areas in Rio Grande and Conejos Counties
    Biological Inventory of Rio Grande and Conejos Counties, Colorado Volume II: A Natural Heritage Inventory and Assessment of Wetlands and Riparian Areas in Rio Grande and Conejos Counties Colorado Natural Heritage Program College of Natural Resources, 254 General Services Building Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado 80523 Biological Inventory of Rio Grande and Conejos Counties, Colorado Volume II: A Natural Heritage Inventory and Assessment of Wetlands and Riparian Areas in Rio Grande and Conejos Counties Prepared for: Colorado Department of Natural Resources 1313 Sherman Street Room 718 Denver, Colorado 80203 Prepared by: Joe Rocchio, Denise Culver, Steve Kettler, and Robert Schorr March 2000 Colorado Natural Heritage Program College of Natural Resources 254 General Services Building Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado 80523 ii USER’S GUIDE The Biological Inventory of Rio Grande and Conejos Counties, conducted by the Colorado Natural Heritage Program, consists of two essentially distinct projects that are highly integrated with respect to methodology and fieldwork. This report reflects the separate nature of the projects by being organized in a two-volume set. Both projects utilized the same Natural Heritage methodology that is used throughout North America, and both searched for and assessed the plants, animals, and plant communities on the Colorado Natural Heritage Program’s list of rare and imperiled elements of biodiversity. Each volume prioritizes potential conservation areas based on the relative significance of the biodiversity they support and the urgency for protection of the site. All information explaining Natural Heritage methodology and ranks is repeated in each volume, so that each volume can stand-alone and be used independently of the other.
    [Show full text]
  • Colorado Southern Frontier Historic Context
    607 COLORADO SOUTHERN FRONTIER HISTORIC CONTEXT PLAINS PLATEAU COUNTRY MOUNTAINS SOUTHERN FRONTIER OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGY AND HISTORIC PRESERVATION COLORADO HISTORICAL SOCIETY COLORADO SOUTHERN FRONTIER HISTORIC CONTEXT CARROL JOE CARTER STEVEN F. MEHLS © 1984 COLORADO HISTORICAL SOCIETY FACSIMILE EDITION 2006 OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGY AND HISTORIC PRESERVATION COLORADO HISTORICAL SOCIETY 1300 BROADWAY DENVER, CO 80203 The activity which is the subject of this material has been financed in part with Federal funds from the National Historic Preservation Act, administered by the National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior and for the Colorado Historical Society. However, the contents and opinions do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the U.S. Department of the Interior or the Society, nor does the mention of trade names or commercial products constitute an endorsement or recommendation by the Department of the Interior or the Society. This program receives Federal funds from the National Park Service. Regulations of the U.S. Department of the Interior strictly prohibit unlawful discrimination in departmental Federally assisted programs on the basis of race, color, national origin, age or handicap. Any person who believes he or she has been discriminated against in any program, activity, or facility operated by a recipient of Federal assistance should write to: Director, Equal Opportunity Program, U.S. Department of the Interior, 1849 C Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20240. This is a facsimile edition of the original 1984 publication. Text and graphics are those of the original edition. CONTENTS SOUTHERN FRONTIER Page no. 1. Spanish Dominance (1664-1822) .• II-1 2. Trading �nd Trapping (1803-1880) .
    [Show full text]
  • The Geologic Story of Colorado's Sangre De Cristo Range
    The Geologic Story of Colorado’s Sangre de Cristo Range Circular 1349 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover shows a landscape carved by glaciers. Front cover, Crestone Peak on left and the three summits of Kit Carson Mountain on right. Back cover, Humboldt Peak on left and Crestone Needle on right. Photograph by the author looking south from Mt. Adams. The Geologic Story of Colorado’s Sangre de Cristo Range By David A. Lindsey A description of the rocks and landscapes of the Sangre de Cristo Range and the forces that formed them. Circular 1349 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2010 This and other USGS information products are available at http://store.usgs.gov/ U.S. Geological Survey Box 25286, Denver Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 To learn about the USGS and its information products visit http://www.usgs.gov/ 1-888-ASK-USGS Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Lindsey, D.A., 2010, The geologic story of Colorado’s Sangre de Cristo Range: U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1349, 14 p. iii Contents The Oldest Rocks ...........................................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC)
    Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC) Summits on the Air USA - Colorado (WØC) Association Reference Manual Document Reference S46.1 Issue number 3.2 Date of issue 15-June-2021 Participation start date 01-May-2010 Authorised Date: 15-June-2021 obo SOTA Management Team Association Manager Matt Schnizer KØMOS Summits-on-the-Air an original concept by G3WGV and developed with G3CWI Notice “Summits on the Air” SOTA and the SOTA logo are trademarks of the Programme. This document is copyright of the Programme. All other trademarks and copyrights referenced herein are acknowledged. Page 1 of 11 Document S46.1 V3.2 Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC) Change Control Date Version Details 01-May-10 1.0 First formal issue of this document 01-Aug-11 2.0 Updated Version including all qualified CO Peaks, North Dakota, and South Dakota Peaks 01-Dec-11 2.1 Corrections to document for consistency between sections. 31-Mar-14 2.2 Convert WØ to WØC for Colorado only Association. Remove South Dakota and North Dakota Regions. Minor grammatical changes. Clarification of SOTA Rule 3.7.3 “Final Access”. Matt Schnizer K0MOS becomes the new W0C Association Manager. 04/30/16 2.3 Updated Disclaimer Updated 2.0 Program Derivation: Changed prominence from 500 ft to 150m (492 ft) Updated 3.0 General information: Added valid FCC license Corrected conversion factor (ft to m) and recalculated all summits 1-Apr-2017 3.0 Acquired new Summit List from ListsofJohn.com: 64 new summits (37 for P500 ft to P150 m change and 27 new) and 3 deletes due to prom corrections.
    [Show full text]
  • Colorado Agriculture Bibliography 2005 a Bibliography of Primary and Secondary Material Published 1820-1945
    Colorado Agriculture Bibliography 2005 A Bibliography of Primary and Secondary Material Published 1820-1945 Subject Areas: Travel, Tourism, & Recreation Type of Materials: Monographs Produced by the Colorado State University Libraries Copyright by Colorado State University Libraries Applies Overview This portable document file (.pdf ) is part of the Colorado Agriculture Bibliography project and includes bibliographic information on a variety of topics related to Colorado’s agricultural and rural past. The topics covered in this project are varied but include agriculture, education, water, mining, tourism, recreation, and more. The bibliography contains information about but not full-text for books, journals, dissertations, theses, archival collections, maps, photos, pamphlets, and more. The Web site and bibliography reflects Colorado’s contribution to the Preserving the History of United States Agriculture and Rural Life Project . This nation-wide effort aims to identify and preserve state and locally significant literature. The project involves the National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH), Cornell University, the United States Agricultural Information Network (USAIN), the National Agricultural Library (NAL), and other land-grant universities. The records in this bibliography may cover several subject areas and are listed alphabetically by author. A searchable website of the bibliography is also available if you would like to create searches and find information on other topics. Colorado Agriculture Searchable Bibliography http://vulture.library.colostate.edu/agbib/ For more information about this project visit the website at: Colorado Agriculture Bibliography http://lib.colostate.edu/research/agbib/ The bibliography of Colorado history project was funded in part by a grant from the National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH).
    [Show full text]