Pomme De Terre Reservoir: a Study in Geographic Change
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
2016 PT Master Plan
OSAGE RIVER BASIN POMME de TERRE RIVER POMME DE TERRE LAKE MASTER PLAN 1/11/2016 PREFACE The Master Plan (MP) for Pomme de Terre Lake was first approved June 14, 1961. Subsequent revisions were prepared with the latest revision approved in October 1988. In 2002 the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) developed and released a set of Environmental Operating Principles to instill environmental stewardship across all the USACE business practices. As the Nation’s resource challenges and priorities have evolved, the principles have been refined and the USACE has re-committed to adhere to these principles. The re-energized Environmental Operating Principles are: Foster sustainability as a way of life throughout the organization. Proactively consider environmental consequences of all USACE activities and act accordingly. Create mutually supporting economic and environmentally sustainable solutions. Continue to meet our corporate responsibility and accountability under the law for activities undertaken by the USACE, which may impact human and natural environments. Consider the environment in employing a risk management and systems approach throughout the life cycles of projects and programs. Leverage scientific, economic and social knowledge to understand the environmental context and effects of USACE actions in a collaborative manner. Employ an open, transparent process that respects views of individuals and groups interested in USACE activities The format utilized for this plan is outlined in Engineering Regulation/Engineer Pamphlet 1130-2-550 (DATED 30 January 2013), which sets forth policy and procedure to be followed in preparation and revision of project MPs. THIS GUIDANCE IS DIFFERENT FROM THE ORIGINAL MP format which was a design memorandum. -
Table of Contents
Table of Contents Prerequisites 3 Section 1 – Introduction and Planning Process 4 1.1 Purpose and Background 4 1.2 History of Hickory County Hazard Mitigation Plan 5 1.3 Participating Jurisdictions 6 1.4 The update process 8 Section 2 – Planning Area Profile and Capabilities 13 2.1 History 13 2.2 Natural Hazard History 13 2.3 Geography and Ecology 16 2.4 Form of Government 18 2.5 Community Partnerships 18 2.6 Demographic Information 18 2.7 Economy, Industry, Employment 20 2.8 Transportation and Commuting Patterns 22 2.9 Education 23 2.10 Major Employers 24 2.11 Capabilities Assessment 25 2.11.1 staff/organizational capabilities and community profiles 25 2.11.2 technical capabilities 38 Section 3 – Risk Assessment 42 3.1 Identifying Hazards 42 3.2 Profiling Hazards 42 3.2.1 dam failure 44 3.2.2 drought 50 3.2.3 earthquake 58 3.2.4 extreme heat 69 3.2.5 flood 73 3.2.6 land subsidence sinkhole 83 3.2.7 levee failure 86 3.2.8 severe winter weather 87 3.2.9 tornado 91 3.2.10 thunderstorms, (Damaging Winds, Lightning, Hail) 94 3.2.11 wildfire 100 3.3 Vulnerability assessment overview 104 3.3.1 Hickory County inventory 104 Kaysinger Basin RPC / Hickory County Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 1 3.3.2 school districts 109 3.3.3 community jurisdictions 110 3.4 Vulnerability summary and impact 112 3.4.1 dam failure vulnerability 112 3.4.2 drought vulnerability 122 3.4.3 earthquake vulnerability 127 3.4.4 extreme heat vulnerability 131 3.4.5 flood vulnerability 133 3.4.6 land and subsidence/sinkhole vulnerability 139 3.4.7 levee failure vulnerability -
Programs and Activities of the Missouri District, Water Resources Division, U.S. Geological Survey, Fiscal Year 1979
PROGRAMS AND ACTIVITIES OF THE MISSOURI DISTRICT, WATER RESOURCES DIVISION UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY FISCAL YEAR 1979 U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OPEN-FILE REPORT 79-1058 Front cover drawing by Douglas R. Stark, Division of Geology and Land Survey PROGRAMS AND ACTIVITIES OF THE MISSOURI DISTRICT, WATER RESOURCES DIVISION, U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY FISCAL YEAR 1979 Compiled by Wanietia M. Kratzer U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Open-File Report 79-1058 Rolla, Missouri July 1979 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR CECIL D. ANDRUS, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY H. William Menard, Director Water Resources Division O. Milton Hackett, Acting Chief Hydrologist For additional information write to: Don L. Coffin, District Chief U.S. Geological Survey, Water Resources Division 1400 Independence Road Mail Stop 200 Rolla, Missouri 65401 CONTENTS Page Abstract 1 Introduction 1 Cooperation 1 Hydrologic-data program 4 Missouri district projects 4 Anticipated new work 50 Sources of information 51 Bibliography 53 II ILLUSTRATIONS Page Figure 1. Chart showing organization of the Missouri district 2 2. Map showing location of hydrologic-data stations, 1979 Back of report TABLES Table 1. Continuous-records (daily discharge) station network, 1979 5 2. Crest-stage (peak discharge) station network, 1979 12 3. Urban rainfall-runoff station network, 1979. 18 4. Active low-flow partial-record stations, 1979 21 III PROGRAMS AND ACTIVITIES OF THE MISSOURI DISTRICT, WATER RESOURCES DIVISION, U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY FISCAL YEAR 1979 ABSTRACT Water-resources investigations of the U.S. Geological Survey in Missouri consist of collecting hydrologic data and conducting interpre- tive investigations. The data and the results of the investigations are published or released by either the U.S. -
Southwest Missouri Water Resource Study – Phase II Regional Supply Availability (2010-2060)
US Army Corps US Army Corps of Engineers ® State of Missouri of Engineers ® Little Rock District Kansas City District Southwest Missouri Water Resource Study – Phase II Regional Supply Availability (2010-2060) March 2014 Final Report This page intentionally left blank Contents 1.0 Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background ............................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Regional Water Demands ...................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Study Purpose ........................................................................................................................ 1 1.4 Supply Availability .................................................................................................................. 2 1.5 Supply Availability and Gap Analysis Approach ..................................................................... 3 1.6 Gap Analysis ........................................................................................................................... 4 1.7 Future Infrastructure Needs .................................................................................................. 8 1.8 Conclusions ............................................................................................................................ 8 1.9 Recommendations .............................................................................................................. -
Environmental and Hydrologic Setting of the Ozark Plateaus Study Unit, Arkansas, Kansas, Missouri, and Oklahoma
ENVIRONMENTAL AND HYDROLOGIC SETTING OF THE OZARK PLATEAUS STUDY UNIT, ARKANSAS, KANSAS, MISSOURI, AND OKLAHOMA U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 94-4022 NATIONAL WATER-QUALITY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL AND HYDROLOGIC SETTING OF THE OZARK PLATEAUS STUDY UNIT, ARKANSAS, KANSAS, MISSOURI, AND OKLAHOMA by James C. Adamski, James C. Petersen, David A. Freiwald, and Jerri V. Davis U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 94-4022 NATIONAL WATER-QUALITY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM Little Rock, Arkansas 1995 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Gordon P. Eaton, Director For additional information Copies of this report can be write to: purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey, WRD Earth Science Information Center 401 Hardin Road Open-File Reports Section Little Rock, Arkansas 72211 Box 25286, MS 517 Denver Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 CONTENTS Abstract....................................................................................................................................................................................1 Introduction .............................................................................................................................................................................2 Purpose and scope .........................................................................................................................................................4 Location.........................................................................................................................................................................5