Pomme De Terre Reservoir: a Study in Geographic Change

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

University of Nebraska at Omaha DigitalCommons@UNO Student Work 11-1-1971 Pomme de Terre Reservoir: A study in geographic change Michael W. Jinks University of Nebraska at Omaha Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/studentwork Recommended Citation Jinks, Michael W., "Pomme de Terre Reservoir: A study in geographic change" (1971). Student Work. 590. https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/studentwork/590 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UNO. It has been accepted for inclusion in Student Work by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UNO. For more information, please contact [email protected]. POMME DE TERRE RESERVOIR: A STUDY IN GEOGRAPHIC CHANGE A Thesis Presented to the Department of Geography and the Faculty of the Graduate College University of Nebraska at Omaha In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts by Michael W. Jinks November 1971 UMI Number: EP73228 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. [email protected]: PeWsMng UMI EP73228 . Published by ProQuest LLC (2015). Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code ProQuest ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106- 1346 Accepted for the faculty of The Graduate College of the University of Nebraska at Omaha, in partial fulfillment rf the requirements for the degree Master of Arts • Graduate Committee Chairmai ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The writer wishes to express sincere appreciation for the cooperation given him by the United States Army Corps of Engineers, the Missouri Tourism Commission, and the Missouri Department of Conservation, These agencies provided valuable information and assistance for this study. Special appreciation is certainly due for Dr. Philip Vogel and Mr. Charles Gildersleeve. Their patient advice, comments, and reactions were essential in making this thesis possible. i l l k TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgments .................... ........ 15. List of Tables .... iv List of Figures*..........................*....... v List of Maps.................................... vi List of Illustrations.............................. vii Introduction....... •........................ 1 Chapter I * BACKGROUND................... ............. 13 II. ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS.................... 35 III. RECREATIONAL ASPECTS..................... IV. ECONOMIC ASPECTS......................... 88 V. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS................... 119 Appe ndixes A. Pomme de Terre Reservoir: Physical Data............. ....*......... 12 B. pomme de Terre Reservoir User Survey.... 125 Sources Consulted......... *.......... * 126 LIST OF TABLES Table I. Estimated Fish Catch.......................... II. Conservation Permit Sales.................... III'. Public Use Areas.............................. IV. Attendance, and Density................. ...... V. Attendance and Density....................... VI. Survey Summary................................. VII. Recreational Activity......................... VIII. Visitor Origins................. .............. IX. Expenditures.................................. X. Length of Stay.'............................... XI. Frequency of Visit (Years)...... ............ XII. Frequency of Visit (Per Year)................ XIII. Party Size.................. .................. XIV. Income ....... ............................ XV. Expend! ture .... .............................. XVI. Expenditure (By Type)......................... XVII. Visitor Suggestions........................... XVIII. Expenditure...... ...... ...................... XIX. Length of Stay...... ...... .................. XX. Frequency of Visit (Years)................... XXI. Frequency of Visit (Per Year)................ XXII. Income................................... ..... XXIII. Expenditure................. .................. XXIV. Party Size.................... ................ XXV. Merchants Licenses. .... .................... XXVI. Business Survey............. ............ ..... XXVII. Housing (By County) .«-« XXVIII. Assessed Valuation............. ............... V LIST OP FIGURES Figure 1. Reservoir Attendance.......................... 11 2. Climograph (Warsaw)............ *............. 15 3. Hickory County Population..................... 2\\. JL[_• Length of Stay................................ 70 5. Frequency of Visitation (Years)............... 71 6 . Frequency of Visitation (PerYear) ........... 71 7. Expenditure................................... 76 6 • Income . .................... ................... 76 9. County Incomes................. .............. 93 10. Bank Deposits......... 101 11. Bank Assets...................... 103 12. Bank Loans.. ............... IOI4. 1 3 . Assessed Valuation (By County)............ 108 vi LIST OP MAPS Map 1. Missouri Lake Areas*......................... 2 2. Area Lakes................................... 5 3. Regional Location..............................ll± I4 . Study Area..................... 21 5* Land Acquisitions................ 3° 6 . Public Use Areas................ £l 7. Visitor Origins (Instate).................... 65 8 . Visitor Origins (Qutstate) ..... 66 vii LIST OP ILLUSTRATIONS Illustration 1. Pomme de Terre Reservoir............... I4. *'2. Wheatland............................... 0 3 . Archaeological Site.......... 26 I4.. Nemo Public Use Area (1)............... 33 5. Typical Cove........................... 33 6 . Nemo Cove............................... 36 7. Lake of the Ozarks..................... 36 ■ 6 . Pishing Cove................ l±L\. 9. Conservation Area.... ......... ^ 10. Quarry Point.............. $ 2 11. Nemo Public Use Area (2)............... $ 2 12# Nemo.............. III4. 13 • Hermitage ............... III4. II4.. Four Corners. .... 115 INTRODUCTION Since the early 1950*8 the U.S. Corps of Engineers have been quite active in Missouri, especially in the Ozark region. By developing several large flood control projects two distinct "lake areas" have emerged. One is located along the south central Missouri-Arkansas boundary in some of the most rugged portions of the Ozarks (Map 1)• The other lake area is located just inside the west central portion of the Missouri Ozarks. Though less rugged than the former it is still comparatively rough, with local relief approaching 200 feet along some rivers. Pomme de Terre Reservoir, the focus of this study, is located in the second of the two areas just mentioned. It was completed in 1961 after four years of construction. Of several large Corps lakes in the area the largest will be the Harry S . Truman Dam and Reservoir, to be completed in the mid-1970fs. It will inundate almost 60,000 acres of land. The completed reservoir will back water up the Pomme de Terre River to' within a few miles of the Pomme de Terre dam. The effects of such a large lake have long been discussed, and with its completion a few years from reality several state and federal organizations are attempting to cooperate in order to provide for the orderly development of the area# MISSOURI LAKE AREAS O CD CO CDO 2 Developed by Union Electric in St. Louis, the nationally known Lake of the Ozarks (covering about 53,000 acres), is less than forty miles from Pomme de Terre Reservoir. One of the nations most intensively de­ veloped lakes, it attracts several million visitors annually. However, the laxity, or even absence, of zoning during the development of the lake has resulted in haphazard and sometimes inappropriate development along the shoreline and along the major transportation routes in and around the lake. Though there will hardly be a dearth of visitors in the foreseeable future, the over commercialization of this lake has been responsible for a loss of some visitors to ether areas. Stockton Reservoir, completed in 1970 by the Corps added 2lf,000 acres of surface water to the area. The usual Corps practice of reserving a 300 foot collar ^ . - (and in some cases .more) around the lake was followed. Never-the-less, development is presently well underway. Franchises for several marinas have been issued, and many subdivisions around the lake have been started. When the Harry S. Truman Dam and Reservoir is completed Pomme de Terre Reservoir will lie just inside a large arc of lakes (.Map 2) . The situation of these water bodies in regard to such population centers as Kansas City, Springfield, and St. Louis have made the area one of the midwestfs recreation centers, especially for the water enthusiasts. 4 Pomme de Terre Reservoir This westward looking aerial view of Pomme de Terre Reservoir illustrates the general size of the lake, and the topography of the area. The dam is on the extreme right. The arm of the lake in the upper center is the Pomne de Terre arm, tnat in the lower left is the Linly Creek arm. Note the amount of land in forest. 5 AREA LAKES VERSAILLES CLINTON LAKE OF THE .WARSAW a OZARKS TRUMAN Lowry City- o CAMDEN- OSCEOLA t o n HERMITAGE POMME de o Urbano TERRE STOCKTON BOLIVAR STOCKTON LEGEND # County Seat 9 Reservoir <2> 10 M 2 I 0 « 6 Though Pomme de Terre is the smallest of the several lakes in the region, it is also one of
Recommended publications
  • 2016 PT Master Plan

    2016 PT Master Plan

    OSAGE RIVER BASIN POMME de TERRE RIVER POMME DE TERRE LAKE MASTER PLAN 1/11/2016 PREFACE The Master Plan (MP) for Pomme de Terre Lake was first approved June 14, 1961. Subsequent revisions were prepared with the latest revision approved in October 1988. In 2002 the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) developed and released a set of Environmental Operating Principles to instill environmental stewardship across all the USACE business practices. As the Nation’s resource challenges and priorities have evolved, the principles have been refined and the USACE has re-committed to adhere to these principles. The re-energized Environmental Operating Principles are: Foster sustainability as a way of life throughout the organization. Proactively consider environmental consequences of all USACE activities and act accordingly. Create mutually supporting economic and environmentally sustainable solutions. Continue to meet our corporate responsibility and accountability under the law for activities undertaken by the USACE, which may impact human and natural environments. Consider the environment in employing a risk management and systems approach throughout the life cycles of projects and programs. Leverage scientific, economic and social knowledge to understand the environmental context and effects of USACE actions in a collaborative manner. Employ an open, transparent process that respects views of individuals and groups interested in USACE activities The format utilized for this plan is outlined in Engineering Regulation/Engineer Pamphlet 1130-2-550 (DATED 30 January 2013), which sets forth policy and procedure to be followed in preparation and revision of project MPs. THIS GUIDANCE IS DIFFERENT FROM THE ORIGINAL MP format which was a design memorandum.
  • Table of Contents

    Table of Contents

    Table of Contents Prerequisites 3 Section 1 – Introduction and Planning Process 4 1.1 Purpose and Background 4 1.2 History of Hickory County Hazard Mitigation Plan 5 1.3 Participating Jurisdictions 6 1.4 The update process 8 Section 2 – Planning Area Profile and Capabilities 13 2.1 History 13 2.2 Natural Hazard History 13 2.3 Geography and Ecology 16 2.4 Form of Government 18 2.5 Community Partnerships 18 2.6 Demographic Information 18 2.7 Economy, Industry, Employment 20 2.8 Transportation and Commuting Patterns 22 2.9 Education 23 2.10 Major Employers 24 2.11 Capabilities Assessment 25 2.11.1 staff/organizational capabilities and community profiles 25 2.11.2 technical capabilities 38 Section 3 – Risk Assessment 42 3.1 Identifying Hazards 42 3.2 Profiling Hazards 42 3.2.1 dam failure 44 3.2.2 drought 50 3.2.3 earthquake 58 3.2.4 extreme heat 69 3.2.5 flood 73 3.2.6 land subsidence sinkhole 83 3.2.7 levee failure 86 3.2.8 severe winter weather 87 3.2.9 tornado 91 3.2.10 thunderstorms, (Damaging Winds, Lightning, Hail) 94 3.2.11 wildfire 100 3.3 Vulnerability assessment overview 104 3.3.1 Hickory County inventory 104 Kaysinger Basin RPC / Hickory County Hazard Mitigation Plan Page 1 3.3.2 school districts 109 3.3.3 community jurisdictions 110 3.4 Vulnerability summary and impact 112 3.4.1 dam failure vulnerability 112 3.4.2 drought vulnerability 122 3.4.3 earthquake vulnerability 127 3.4.4 extreme heat vulnerability 131 3.4.5 flood vulnerability 133 3.4.6 land and subsidence/sinkhole vulnerability 139 3.4.7 levee failure vulnerability
  • Programs and Activities of the Missouri District, Water Resources Division, U.S. Geological Survey, Fiscal Year 1979

    Programs and Activities of the Missouri District, Water Resources Division, U.S. Geological Survey, Fiscal Year 1979

    PROGRAMS AND ACTIVITIES OF THE MISSOURI DISTRICT, WATER RESOURCES DIVISION UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY FISCAL YEAR 1979 U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OPEN-FILE REPORT 79-1058 Front cover drawing by Douglas R. Stark, Division of Geology and Land Survey PROGRAMS AND ACTIVITIES OF THE MISSOURI DISTRICT, WATER RESOURCES DIVISION, U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY FISCAL YEAR 1979 Compiled by Wanietia M. Kratzer U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Open-File Report 79-1058 Rolla, Missouri July 1979 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR CECIL D. ANDRUS, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY H. William Menard, Director Water Resources Division O. Milton Hackett, Acting Chief Hydrologist For additional information write to: Don L. Coffin, District Chief U.S. Geological Survey, Water Resources Division 1400 Independence Road Mail Stop 200 Rolla, Missouri 65401 CONTENTS Page Abstract 1 Introduction 1 Cooperation 1 Hydrologic-data program 4 Missouri district projects 4 Anticipated new work 50 Sources of information 51 Bibliography 53 II ILLUSTRATIONS Page Figure 1. Chart showing organization of the Missouri district 2 2. Map showing location of hydrologic-data stations, 1979 Back of report TABLES Table 1. Continuous-records (daily discharge) station network, 1979 5 2. Crest-stage (peak discharge) station network, 1979 12 3. Urban rainfall-runoff station network, 1979. 18 4. Active low-flow partial-record stations, 1979 21 III PROGRAMS AND ACTIVITIES OF THE MISSOURI DISTRICT, WATER RESOURCES DIVISION, U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY FISCAL YEAR 1979 ABSTRACT Water-resources investigations of the U.S. Geological Survey in Missouri consist of collecting hydrologic data and conducting interpre- tive investigations. The data and the results of the investigations are published or released by either the U.S.
  • Southwest Missouri Water Resource Study – Phase II Regional Supply Availability (2010-2060)

    Southwest Missouri Water Resource Study – Phase II Regional Supply Availability (2010-2060)

    US Army Corps US Army Corps of Engineers ® State of Missouri of Engineers ® Little Rock District Kansas City District Southwest Missouri Water Resource Study – Phase II Regional Supply Availability (2010-2060) March 2014 Final Report This page intentionally left blank Contents 1.0 Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background ............................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Regional Water Demands ...................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Study Purpose ........................................................................................................................ 1 1.4 Supply Availability .................................................................................................................. 2 1.5 Supply Availability and Gap Analysis Approach ..................................................................... 3 1.6 Gap Analysis ........................................................................................................................... 4 1.7 Future Infrastructure Needs .................................................................................................. 8 1.8 Conclusions ............................................................................................................................ 8 1.9 Recommendations ..............................................................................................................
  • Environmental and Hydrologic Setting of the Ozark Plateaus Study Unit, Arkansas, Kansas, Missouri, and Oklahoma

    Environmental and Hydrologic Setting of the Ozark Plateaus Study Unit, Arkansas, Kansas, Missouri, and Oklahoma

    ENVIRONMENTAL AND HYDROLOGIC SETTING OF THE OZARK PLATEAUS STUDY UNIT, ARKANSAS, KANSAS, MISSOURI, AND OKLAHOMA U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 94-4022 NATIONAL WATER-QUALITY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL AND HYDROLOGIC SETTING OF THE OZARK PLATEAUS STUDY UNIT, ARKANSAS, KANSAS, MISSOURI, AND OKLAHOMA by James C. Adamski, James C. Petersen, David A. Freiwald, and Jerri V. Davis U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 94-4022 NATIONAL WATER-QUALITY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM Little Rock, Arkansas 1995 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Gordon P. Eaton, Director For additional information Copies of this report can be write to: purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey, WRD Earth Science Information Center 401 Hardin Road Open-File Reports Section Little Rock, Arkansas 72211 Box 25286, MS 517 Denver Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 CONTENTS Abstract....................................................................................................................................................................................1 Introduction .............................................................................................................................................................................2 Purpose and scope .........................................................................................................................................................4 Location.........................................................................................................................................................................5