Historical Dictionary of the U.S. Army

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Historical Dictionary of the U.S. Army Historical Dictionary of the U.S. Army Jerold E. Brown Editor GREENWOOD PRESS Historical Dictionary of the U.S. Army EDITED BY Jerold E. Brown GREENWOOD PRESS Westport, Connecticut • London Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Historical dictionary of the U.S. Army / edited by Jerold E. Brown. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0–313–29322–8 (alk. paper) 1. United States. Army—History—Dictionaries. I. Brown, Jerold E. UA25.H67 2001 355'.00973'03—dc21 00–022373 British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data is available. Copyright ᭧ 2001 by Jerold E. Brown All rights reserved. No portion of this book may be reproduced, by any process or technique, without the express written consent of the publisher. Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 00–022373 ISBN: 0–313–29322–8 First published in 2001 Greenwood Press, 88 Post Road West, Westport, CT 06881 An imprint of Greenwood Publishing Group, Inc. www.greenwood.com Printed in the United States of America TM The paper used in this book complies with the Permanent Paper Standard issued by the National Information Standards Organization (Z39.48–1984). 10987654321 In memory of Spec. 4 Ronald W. Brunson 23 December 1946–1 September 1969 CONTENTS Preface ix A Brief History of the U.S. Army xiii by Christopher R. Gabel Historical Dictionary 1 Appendix A: Abbreviations and Acronyms 531 Appendix B: Ranks and Grades in the U.S. Army 541 Sources 543 Index 609 About the Editor and Contributors 653 PREFACE The U.S. Army has evolved, changed, and matured over the past two and a quarter centuries to become the premier military force in the world. During that time, the American soldier has served loyally and faithfully in war and peace, contributing to the development of the nation and fighting for freedom and American ideals on battlefields around the world. The Army’s heritage is rich in history, tradition, and lore. Compiling and editing this one-volume historical dictionary of the U.S. Army has been a challenge and an opportunity. The opportunity has been to bring to the interested reader, student, and researcher a broad cross section of military terms, concepts, arms and equipment, units and organizations, campaigns and battles, and individuals who have contributed significantly to the U.S. Army. The challenge has been to select those entries that will be of greatest value to users of this volume. I began the selection of entries with a list of terms and names that I had accumulated from student questions and concerns during my more than twenty years of teaching both graduate and undergraduate courses in American and military history. I further selected entries suggested or recommended by my colleagues at the Combat Studies Institute, U.S. Army Command and General Staff College; by scholars and historians I invited to contribute to the volume; and by officers, teachers, and archivists with extensive knowledge of U.S. Army history and historiography. Unfortunately, space made it impossible to include all of the proposals I received; I had to omit a number of excellent submissions. I am fully responsible for the final selection of entries. The terms, names, and concepts common to the U.S. Army are to be found in a wide variety of sources. These sources include books—both nonfiction and fiction; biographies; autobiographies; memoirs; monographs; general and mili- tary histories; articles and essays in professional and popular periodicals; jour- nals; magazines; official, semiofficial, and private unit, organizational, and x PREFACE installation histories; U.S. Army and joint doctrinal publications and regulations; movies; television and stage productions; and the everyday language of soldiers on the parade ground and in the field. Even a brief perusal of the sources at the back of this volume will demonstrate the breadth of sources where one can find Army terms and usages. With a few exceptions, each entry in this volume is followed by a reference or references. For users of this volume who choose to learn more about specific terms, names, and concepts, the references place the terms in context and serve as initial sources for further research. The references contain only the short title and date of publication for each work cited. A full citation of each book or article in the references can be found in the sources at the back of the volume. While all terms in this dictionary can be found in published sources, some terms are predominantly part of the spoken language of soldiers. While U.S. Army veterans, serving soldiers, and most other uniformed service members will instantly recognize and understand these terms, I did not supply references I considered unnecessary or too obscure. The use of acronyms and abbreviations in the U.S. Army is ubiquitous. Find- ing one’s way through the maze of abbreviations and acronyms can be a serious challenge for anyone unfamiliar with military literature, especially the non- military reader or researcher. A number of official and commercially published guides are available to assist readers with this type of military terminology. See, for example, U.S. Army Regulation 310-50, Authorized Abbreviations, Brevity Codes, and Acronyms (Washington, D.C.: Department of the Army, 1985), and Fernando B. Morinigo, The Acronym Book: Acronyms in Aerospace and Defense (Washington, D.C.: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 1990). Keep in mind, however, that acronyms frequently have more than one meaning and that they change meanings from time to time. Users of this volume will find a convenient list of the acronyms and abbreviations in Appendix A. Many of the weapons, arms, equipment, units, organizations, historical events, and concepts included in this volume are commonly known by more than one term or name. To facilitate the use of this volume, I have included numerous cross-references. In each case, however, I endeavored to associate the definition with the most commonly used variation of the term. An asterisk (*) in the definition or explanation of a term indicates that the preceding term has its own entry in the dictionary. In the course of compiling and editing this volume, I have incurred many debts. Many friends and colleagues assisted me with this project; some made valuable recommendations and suggestions for entries or sources, while others provided encouragement and moral support. I regret that I cannot thank everyone individually. I would, however, be remiss if I did not mention a few names that were particularly instrumental in supporting me over the past six years. Above all, I thank Mildred “Mim” Vasan, former Senior Editor, Social and Behavioral Sciences, at Greenwood Press for offering me the opportunity to undertake this project. When Mim retired, Cynthia Harris took over supervision of my project, PREFACE xi and she has shown infinite patience with my progress. I owe both of these fine editors my deepest thanks. I greatly appreciate the support of the directors of the Combat Studies Institute at the U.S. Army Command and Staff College. Colonels Richard Swain, Jerry D. Morelock, and Clay Edwards not only allowed me the freedom to work on this project when it did not interfere with my other duties but contributed entries to the volume. I owe much to my colleagues at the Combat Studies Institute: Chris Gabel, Bob Baumann, Tom Huber, Gary Bjorge, Jack Gifford, Larry Yates, and many former Army and Air Force officers of CSI contributed entries; others provided ideas, suggestions for entries, and assistance with sources and references. Special thanks goes to Mr. Donald Gilmore, editor at the Combat Studies Institute, who helped in innumerable ways. I greatly appreciate the as- sistance of Professor Pete Maslowski, University of Nebraska, and Professor John J. Contreni, Purdue University, for recruiting some of their best graduate students to write entries for the dictionary. The staff at the Combined Arms Research Library at Fort Leavenworth, Kan- sas, performed above and beyond the call of duty in their efforts to assist me. Without the help of Dan Dorris, Joanne Knight, Pat Wells, Dorothy Rogers, Mary Jo Nelson, Dianne Karis, Bernie Brose, John Rogers, and a host of others too numerous for me to list here, I would still be searching for necessary ref- erences in distant corners of the library. I wish to thank all of the contributors to this dictionary. Their hard work, attention to detail, and knowledge of the U.S. Army is clearly evident in the pages of this volume. All errors are mine alone. Finally, I thank my wife, Shirley, for putting up with me over the years I have devoted to this project. Without her support, it would never have been finished. A BRIEF HISTORY OF THE U.S. ARMY The U.S. Army traces its heritage back to the 1600s and the period of coloni- zation. From the first, England’s colonies in North America differed from those established by the other European powers. The colonies founded by France and Spain were primarily intended to extract wealth and send it back to the mother country; hence, those colonies were populated by fortune seekers, priests, ad- ministrators, and soldiers. In contrast, the English colonies in North America consisted of farmers, craftsmen, merchants, and their families. These colonists were intent on starting new lives, not on extracting wealth. England sent very few soldiers to her colonies in North America. When the colonists needed military protection, they generally had to provide it themselves. Most colonies enacted militia laws, which required every able-bodied man to provide himself with a weapon and report to periodic training sessions. In war- time, individuals would volunteer, or be selected, for active duty. Two concepts that still shape the American military can be traced to this period.
Recommended publications
  • 68 STAT. Private Law 391 CHAPTER 260 Be It Enacted Hy the /Senate
    A62 PRIVATE LAW 391-JUNE 3, 1954 [68 STAT. Private Law 391 CHAPTER 260 June 3, 19S4 ^^ ACT —CH' R. 4996]— p^j^. ^jjg i-eiigf of Colonel Henry M. Denning, and others. Be it enacted hy the /Senate and House of Representatives of the Col. Henry M. Denning and United States of America in Congress assembled, Tliat relief is hereby others. " granted the various disbursing officers of the United States or claim­ ants hereinafter mentioned in amounts shown herein, said amounts representing amounts of erroneous payments made by said disbursing officers of public funds for which said officers are accountable or amounts due said claimants as listed in and under the circumstances described in identical letters of the Secretary of the Army to the Speaker of the House of Representatives and chairman, Committee on Armed Services, United States Senate. SEC. 2. That the Comptroller General of the United States be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to credit in the accounts of the following officers and employees of the Army of the United States the amounts set opposite their names: Colonel Henry M. Denning, Finance Corps (now retired), $133.77; Colonel C. K. McAlister, Finance Corps, $39.79; Colonel Frank Richards, Finance Corps (now retired), $34.69; Colonel H. R. Cole, Corps of Engineers, $18.72, the said amounts representing erroneous payments of public funds for which these persons are accountable, resulting from minor errors in deter­ mining amounts of pay and allowances due former members of the Civilian Conservation Corps, former officers, enlisted men, and civilian employees of the Army or contractors from whom collection of the overpayments cannot be effected, and which amounts have been disal­ lowed by the Comptroller General of the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Profile of the United States Army (2016)
    Interested in becoming a member of AUSA? Join online at: www.ausa.org/membership Profile of the United States Army is produced for you, and we value your opinion about its appearance and content. Please send any feedback (positive or negative) regarding this edition of Profile to Ellen Toner at: [email protected] Developed by AUSA’s Institute of Land Warfare RESEARCH AND WRITING EDITING Ellen Toner Sandra J. Daugherty GRAPHICS AND DESIGN TECHNICAL SUPPORT Kevin Irwin Master Print, Inc. Photographs courtesy of the United States Army and the Department of Defense. ©2016 by the Association of the United States Army. All rights reserved. Association of the United States Army Institute of Land Warfare 2425 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, Virginia 22201-3385 703-841-4300 • www.ausa.org CONTENTS F FOREWORD v 1 NATIONAL DEFENSE 1 2 LAND COMPONENT 9 3 ARMY ORGANIZATION 21 4 THE SOLDIER 31 5 THE UNIFORM 39 6 THE ARMY ON POINT 49 7 ARMY FAMILIES 55 8 ARMY COMMAND STRUCTURE 63 9 ARMY INSTALLATIONS 85 G GLOSSARY 93 M MAPS 95 III FOREWORD hroughout its 241 years, the United States has maintained its Army as the world’s most Tformidable fighting force. Under General George Washington, the Continental Army fought for the independence and rights of a fledgling nation. This first American Army— primarily made up of ordinary citizens with little or no warfighting experience—comprised Soldiers who held a zealous desire for independence. Their motivation for freedom ultimately led them to defeat the well-established and well-trained British army. This motivation and love for country are instilled in today’s Soldiers as they continue to fight for and defend freedom from oppression for all.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 2033 TITLE 10—ARMED FORCES § 3064 (D) the Organized
    Page 2033 TITLE 10—ARMED FORCES § 3064 (d) The organized peace establishment of the (13) such other basic branches as the Sec- Army consists of all— retary considers necessary. (1) military organizations of the Army with (b) The Secretary may discontinue or consoli- their installations and supporting and auxil- date basic branches of the Army for the duration iary elements, including combat, training, ad- of any war, or of any national emergency de- ministrative, and logistic elements; and clared by Congress. (2) members of the Army, including those (c) The Secretary may not assign to a basic not assigned to units; branch any commissioned officer appointed in a necessary to form the basis for a complete and special branch. immediate mobilization for the national defense (Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 166.) in the event of a national emergency. (Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 166; Pub. L. HISTORICAL AND REVISION NOTES 109–163, div. A, title X, § 1057(a)(6), Jan. 6, 2006, Revised 119 Stat. 3441.) section Source (U.S. Code) Source (Statutes at Large) HISTORICAL AND REVISION NOTES 3063(a) ..... 10:1g(a) (less words of 1st June 28, 1950, ch. 383, sentence after semi- § 306(a), 64 Stat. 269. colon, and less last Revised Source (U.S. Code) Source (Statutes at Large) sentence). section 3063(b) ..... 10:1g(a) (last sentence). 3063(c) ..... 10:1g(a) (words of 1st sen- 3062(a) ..... 10:20. July 10, 1950, ch. 454, § 2, tence after semicolon). 3062(b) ..... 5:181–1(e). § 101, 64 Stat. 321. 3062(c) ....
    [Show full text]
  • Mid-Twentieth Century Architecture in Alaska Historic Context (1945-1968)
    Mid-Twentieth Century Architecture in Alaska Historic Context (1945-1968) Prepared by Amy Ramirez . Jeanne Lambin . Robert L. Meinhardt . and Casey Woster 2016 The Cultural Resource Programs of the National Park Service have responsibilities that include stewardship of historic buildings, museum collections, archeological sites, cultural landscapes, oral and written histories, and ethnographic resources. The material is based upon work assisted by funding from the National Park Service. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Department of the Interior. Printed 2018 Cover: Atwood Center, Alaska Pacific University, Anchorage, 2017, NPS photograph MID-TWENTIETH CENTURY ARCHITECTURE IN ALASKA HISTORIC CONTEXT (1945 – 1968) Prepared for National Park Service, Alaska Regional Office Prepared by Amy Ramirez, B.A. Jeanne Lambin, M.S. Robert L. Meinhardt, M.A. and Casey Woster, M.A. July 2016 Table of Contents LIST OF ACRONYMS/ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................... 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................... 8 1.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ..................................................................................................................... 9 1.1 Historic Context as a Planning & Evaluation Tool ............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Basic Branches of the United States Army Basic Branch Information After
    Basic Branches of the United States Army Basic Branch Information After graduation from ROTC Advanced Camp and before commissioning, cadets make the most important decision of their emerging Army career ­ which branch to serve in. The reasons for choosing a branch are varied and personal. The choice can based on the desire to use the academic credentials gained while at school or simply a desire to do something exciting. The 16 basic branches available to cadets are all important to the total Army force and each cannot function without the other. Adjutant General ­ To plan, develop, and direct systems for managing the Army's personnel, administrative, and Army band systems. These systems impact on unit readiness, morale, and soldier career satisfaction, and cover the life cycle management of all Army personnel. Air Defense Artillery ­ The primary mission will be to protect the force and critical tactical and geopolitical assets. This important task is made especially challenging by the evolution of modern tactical ballistic missiles, unmanned aerial vehicles and aircraft. Armor/Cavalry ­ The heritage and spirit of the United States Calvary lives today in Armor. And although the horse has been replaced by 60 tons of steel driven by 1,500HP engine, the dash and daring of the Horse Calvary still reside in Armor. Today, the Armor branch of the Army (which includes Armored Calvary), is one of the Army's most versatile combat arms. It’s continually evolving to meet worldwide challenges and potential threats. Aviation­ One of the most exciting and capable elements of the Combined Arms Team. As the only branch of the Army that operates in the third dimension of the battlefield, Aviation plays a key role by performing a wide range of missions under diverse conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Brief 3: Archeology in the National Historic Landmarks Program
    National park service logo, U.S. department of the interior logo. � ARCHEOLOGICAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM � Technical Brief No. 3, December 1988 ARCHEOLOGY IN THE NATIONAL HISTORIC LANDMARKS PROGRAM By RobertS. Grwnet Archeologist, Mid-AtlanJicRegional Office National ParkService U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR NATIONAL PARK SERVICE The Nalional Park Service 's NaJionalHistoric Landmarks not fully consider impacts upon archeological resources, (NIil) Program plays a major role in preserving and (3) looting andvandalism. America's nationally significant cultural resources. National Historic Landmark designation increases public awareness of archeology by highlighting the importance of The Special Characterlo;tlcs of our most significant prehistoric and historic archeological Archeologlcal Resources resources. By disseminating information on threats to archeological NHLs, the Program draws aJtention to the Archeological monuments, ruins, and objects were among worstproblems confronting ourj111est sites. By sponsoring the first cultural resources to be recognized and protected study of nationally significant archeological resources, the under Federal law. Public concern about threats to NIil Program helps us to better understand ourpast. And prehistoric ruins on Federal land in the Southwest rallied by increasing the number of archeological NHLs, the politicalsupport for the protective Antiquities Act of 1906. Program publicizes the benef11s and limitalions of current Indeed, it has generally been relatively easy to identify, laws and statutes meant to prolect our archeological evaluate, and designate such spectacular sites as the pueblo heritage. ruins in New Mexico's Chaco Culture National Historical Park and the mound complexes at Cahokia, Illinois, or Following the introduction, this publicalion explains what Moundville, Alabama. the NHL Program is; describes the process by which Nllls are identifted, nominated, and designated; defines the Most archeological resources, however, are far less major issues involving Nill prehistoric and historic conspicuous.
    [Show full text]
  • Two Cannon Wreck” Project, 1986
    The “Two Cannon Wreck” Project, 1986 The “Two Cannon Wreck” Project Archaeology Underwater at Lewisfield Plantation, Berkeley County, SC By Carl Steen 1987 (Revised March 2018) 1987 (revised March 2018) 1 The “Two Cannon Wreck” Project, 1986 ABSTRACT In the fall of 1986 South Carolina Institute of Archaeology and Anthropology personnel conducted test excavations at the Two Cannon Wreck site (38BK856). This site is located offshore from Lewisfield Plantation, on the West Branch of the Cooper River near Moncks Corner in Berkeley County, South Carolina. A reminiscence of an action that occurred at Lewisfield Plantation in the American Revolution on July 16, 1781, was published in the nineteenth century. Based on this account, three divers found a sunken vessel and recovered two cannons of Revolutionary War vintage. Pursuant to the mandates of The South Carolina Underwater Antiquities Act of 1982, a long-term archaeological recovery plan was undertaken, the first phase of which involved limited testing and extensive archival research. A total of nine five-foot-square excavation units were opened along one side of the keel that revealed about twenty feet of the vessel. This testing revealed a burned vessel of indeterminate length and approximately fourteen feet abeam. Artifacts recovered from the test units date from the entire period of the occupation of Lewisfield Plantation. However, artifacts directly associated with the vessel, including melted glass and military items, date to the period of the American Revolution, supporting the contention that this vessel was burned and sunk during the Revolution. Extensive research into primary and secondary documents on the American Revolution in South Carolina has revealed nothing to corroborate the published reminiscence, or to clearly document (or deny) this, or any, action at Lewisfield.
    [Show full text]
  • Spanish- American War Fortifications St Johns Bluff, Florida
    Spanish-American War Fortifications St. Johns Bluff, Florida by George E. Buker Professor Emeritus Jacksonville University Fort Caroline National Memorial Contract No PX 531090043 Buker In the decade after the Civil War the United States military services reverted to near pre-1861 size and returned to peacetime duties. For the Navy this meant showing the flag aboard sailing vessels built for extended cruising. For the Army it meant a return to border patrols and Indian pacification on the western frontier. Th e recently developed military technologies of steam power, high-powered rifled guns and armored protection were no longer needed. This period of military somnambulism continued until the 1880s before Congress determined to take action to modernize the Navy. But following on the discussions about the offensive potential of the new Navy came the realization that coastal defense was the other side of the nation's military modernization coin. In the 1820 s· the nation had embarked upon a coastal defense strategy based upon masonry fortifications, such as forts Pickens and Clinch in Florida, Fort Pulaski in Georgia and Fort Moultrie in South Carolina. The advance of weapons technology during the Civil War found the heavy, rifled guns turning masonry forts into rubble, and both sides resorted to piling earth around the brick walls to make the fort s impervious to enemy fire. But peace in 1865 brought a halt to military construction. In March , 1 885, President Grover Cleveland appointed Buker 2 his Secretary of War, William c. Endicott, to head a board to investigate and make recommendations for the nation's coastal defenses.
    [Show full text]
  • The Field Artillery Journal Vol
    No. 6, November-December, 1931 A Very Modern Piece of Heavy Field Artillery—The 155mm Gun— 8-inch Howitzer ...................................................................Frontispiece The Annual Report of the Chief of Field Artillery ................................. 577 General Braxton Bragg............................................................................. 600 Lieut. R. T. Bennison, F. A., D. O. L. General Lassiter Retires............................................................................ 612 Field Artillery R. O. T. C. at Oregon State College................................ 615 Major F. W. Bowley, F. A. Type Problems ........................................................................................... 622 Heavy Artillery vs. Rockets ...................................................................... 625 Captain M. A. Stuart, F. A. An Auxiliary Range Disk for Use With 37mm Sub-Caliber Tubes on 75mm Gun, Model of 1897 (French) ................................................ 641 Major J. E. Lewis, F. A. The Field Artillery Pistol Team, 1931...................................................... 646 Foreign Military Journals: A Current Resume ...................................... 647 Field Line Construction ............................................................................ 655 Major W. P. Evans, Signal Corps Old Post Chapel at Fort Sill...................................................................... 659 Chaplain Milton O. Beebe, U. S. Army 155mm Gun—8-inch Howitzer (Illustrations) .......................................
    [Show full text]
  • Boreal Partners in Flight 2009 Project Summaries
    Boreal Partners in Flight 2009 Project Summaries Table of Contents BCR REPORTS BCR 1 – Renner ………………………………………………………………….……….4 BCR 2 – Savage…………………………………………………………………………...4 BCR 5 – Cady………………………………………………………...…………………...6 PROJECT SUMMARIES Ajmi – Fort Wainwright Tanana Flats Training Area and Yukon Training Area………..7 Ambrose et al. – American Peregrine Falcon (Falocperegrinus anatum) Monitoring along the Upper Yukon River in Yukon-Charley River National Preserve……………………………………………………………………………….….10 Baluss and Hopey – Tongass National Forest Partners in Flight…………………….…12 de Zeeuw – New National Eagle Take Permit Program…………………………...……13 Ely and Shook – Tundra Swan Avian Influenza Sampling on the North Slope of Alaska……………………………………………………………………………………14 Gotthardt et al. – Biogeography of Select Avian Species in Alaska’s National Parks…………………………………………………………..………….………………14 Griese and Moran – Elmendorf AFB Update…………………………………………..15 1 Harwood – Landbird Update for Kanuti NWF...........................................................…..15 Johnson et al. – Using Satellite Telementry to Determine Migratory Movements of Short-eared Owls from the Seward Peniusula……………………………………….…..16 Johnson et al. – Landbird Update from Tetlin NRW………………………...…………16 Kirchhoff – The Audubon Alaska WatchList……………………………………….…..20 Kovach – Bird Monitoring at Innoko NWR…………………………………….……….21 Macander and Augustine – USAF Goose Forage Study, the Near Island Group in Western Aleutians…………………………………………………..................................21 Matsuoka and Pardieck – North American
    [Show full text]
  • General Lesley J. Mcnair: Little-Known Architect of the U.S
    General Lesley J. McNair: Little-Known Architect of the U.S. Army By [Copyright 2012] Mark T. Calhoun Submitted to the graduate degree program in History and the Graduate Faculty of the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. ________________________________ Dr. Theodore A. Wilson ________________________________ Dr. Robert F. Baumann ________________________________ Dr. Christopher R. Gabel ________________________________ Dr. Jeffrey P. Moran ________________________________ Dr. Brent J. Steele Date Defended: April 6, 2012 The Dissertation Committee for Mark T. Calhoun certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: General Lesley J. McNair: Little-Known Architect of the U.S. Army ________________________________ Dr. Theodore A. Wilson Date approved: April 6, 2012 ii ABSTRACT General Lesley J. McNair demonstrated an innovative spirit and exceptional intellectual capacity in his efforts to organize and train the U.S. Army for World War II. The influence he exerted on Army doctrine, training, equipment development, unit organization, and combined arms fighting methods placed him among the handful of generals most responsible for both the effectiveness and the flaws of the force that the United States sent to war in 1942. Through his strong views and aggressive leadership, McNair played a key role in guiding the Army’s interwar mechanization and doctrinal development efforts. Many studies of this period have described aspects of his participation in that process. However, no comprehensive study of McNair’s forty-year military career exists, largely because he did not survive the war, and he left behind no personal memoirs or diaries when he died of wounds inflicted by errant American bombs in Normandy on July 25, 1944.
    [Show full text]
  • Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) Market Overview
    Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) Market Overview July 18, 2012 Contents . Definitions . Facts & Figures . UAS Budgets and Spending . Trends and Challenges . Future of Unmanned Aerial Systems . Summary and Recommendations . Appendix A: DoD UAS Acquisition Costs . Appendix B: DoD Current and Future Domestic UAS Locations 2 7/18/2012 ©2012 Deltek, Inc. All Rights Reserved Definitions . Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) . Refers to systems whose components include the necessary equipment, network, and personnel to control an unmanned aircraft . UAS is a broader term that includes equipment, networks, and personnel in addition to Unmanned Aerial Vehicles. Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) . Refers to a powered aerial vehicle that does not carry a human operation, uses aerodynamic forces to provide vehicle life, can fly autonomously or be piloted remotely, can be expendable or recoverable, and can carry a lethal or nonlethal payload . Commonly known as “drones”. In practice, the terms UAS and UAV are often used interchangeably Source: CRS Report R41284, “Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR) Acquisition: Issues for Congress,” December 27, 2011. 3 7/18/2012 ©2012 Deltek, Inc. All Rights Reserved Facts & Figures . Dept. of Defense (DoD) spending on UAS has increased from $284 million in FY00 to $3.9 billion in FY12 . DoD’s unmanned aircraft inventory increased more than 40-fold from 167 aircraft in 2002 to nearly 7,500 in 2010 . In 2009, DoD completed almost 500,000 UAS flight hours just in support of Operation Enduring Freedom and Operation Iraqi Freedom . In May 2010, unmanned systems surpassed one million flight hours . In November 2010 unmanned systems achieved one million combat hours Sources: CRS Report R41284, “Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR) Acquisition: Issues for Congress,” December 27, 2011; CRS Report R42136, “Unmanned Aerial Systems,” January 3, 2012; Dept.
    [Show full text]