Religious Zionism in Israel Today: 12 Toward the Center

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Religious Zionism in Israel Today: 12 Toward the Center Religious Zionism in Israel Today: 12 Toward the Center One ongoing topic of political and social discussion community has an outsized impact on Israeli in Israel today is the changing character of public life. It has spearheaded the movement to leadership, or of the "elites." This change is thought settle Judea and Samaria (that is, the occupied to occur in regard to both the governing elites and territories of the West Bank), and today its the leadership in other crucial spheres, such as the members make up a very sizable portion of the military and the media. To the extent that this IDF’s officer corps (in combat units they make change is occurring it is consequential because it up over a third of the officers). Moreover, in the will be bound up with changes in policy, and in current government they control three ministries, behavior and substance. In this chapter we will two of which have an important impact on general focus upon one population sector involved in Israeli public life – the Ministry of Education and these processes – the Religious Zionist sector*. the Ministry of Justice. Just as important, for the This sector, for the most part, carries its own first time in the history of the state, three of the approach to Zionism and Jewish nationalism, most senior positions in the security and defense and, as we shall see, is eager to exercise moral and establishment – Head of the Mossad, Head of political influence and leadership. General Security Service (Shin Bet), and Chief of As commonly defined, the Religious Zionist Police are held by people who were raised in the community constitutes about 10-12 percent of Religious Zionist community. the population1, however, according to a recent Religious Zionism arose and developed as an survey, this community comprises about one fifth attempt to integrate Orthodox Judaism and of the Jewish population.2 modern nationalism. Within this framework, Despite its small size, the Religious Zionist Religious Zionists view the flourishing of the Jewish the jewish people policy institute 137 people, the State of Israel, and the control and noteworthy because it partially reverses the trend settlement of the Land of Israel as essential parts that has characterized Religious Zionism for the of the religious way of life they are committed to. past generation or so. The first development is the increased As Religious Zionism presents a public image that crystallization of the drive to have an impact is less sectarian and stringently religious, its integral upon, and even lead, the political, cultural, and nationalist agenda and nationalist leadership can moral life of Israel. Religious Zionism constitutes become more generally acceptable. This trend also an alternative, integral formulation of Jewish finds expression in the attempt to appoint non- nationalism, which is different from, and even observant representatives of the Jewish Home opposed to, liberal formulations insofar as it Party to the Knesset and the Government. tends to give priority to collective belonging and collective goals over individual goals, needs, and ambitions. Religious Zionist moral and political Part I - The Drive Toward Political leadership would aim to strengthen the Jewish and Moral Leadership nationalist character of the State of Israel and its The drive toward moral and political leadership attachment to the Greater Land of Israel. Currently, is a long-term trend in Religious Zionism and the Religious Zionist community aims to exercise essentially grows out of the fundamental identity this leadership through its prominence in the dilemma that characterizes this sector. This military, through its control of the Education and dilemma derives from the confrontation of Justice Ministries and the policies and legislation traditional Orthodox Jews with modern Jewish they initiate and implement, and through grass nationalism as the organizing principle of Jewish roots efforts at education and local communal life. Those groups that carried the Jewish religion leadership. as the organizing principle of Jewish life can react In addition to the attempt at leadership to this challenge in one of the following ways: implemented through the Jewish Home Party and One can oppose and reject modern Jewish organizations fully identified with the Religious nationalism. Zionist sector, the Religious Zionist public also One can assign to it a limited instrumental attempts to exercise leadership through the ruling meaning and thereby attempt to enable it to Likud Party. coexist with traditional Judaism. A second development is that there has been a One can attempt to effect an integration and reduction in religiosity among part of the Religious unification of religion and modern nationalism. It Zionist public. While this development has only should be stressed that this is not a return to the fully affected part of the community, it has had a traditional conflation of religion and peoplehood good deal of public visibility and discussion. It is (though its proponents sometimes want to 138 the jewish people policy institute present it as such), but an attempt to integrate building, such as politics, settlement, defense and religion with the ideas of modern nationalism and economic and cultural production.4 its institutional structures such as the modern The most definitive expression, of this initial drive nation-state. to morally and politically lead the entire state of The response of Religious Zionism has been Israel was the project of the incorporation and to integrate and unify traditional Orthodox settlement of the Greater Land of Israel. Though Judaism with modern nationalism. This the Religious Zionist community provided attempt at integration has been gradual the most active elements in this project and and long term. In the first stage, the Religious elaborated its ideological formulation, it did not Zionist implemented the unification of religion conceive of it as a project of the Religious Zionist and nationalism at the local and communal sector alone. On the contrary, they conceived level – especially in Religious Zionist kibbutzim of it as expressing the inner, general will of the and moshavim. It was only in the late 1950s entire nation. With the accession of the Likud that they started to think about implementing government in 1977, the settlement of the Greater it on the state-wide political level as well, with Land of Israel became official government policy. the emergence of “the generation of the state,” who were organized into the Young Mizrachi The Disengagement from Gaza Faction within the National Religious Party. This generation was socialized after the creation of the and the Face-to-Face Project state in 1948 with the state educational system Despite this ambition to influence national life and the IDF playing decisive roles. In the late 1950s, and policy, and to exercise moral and political the Young Mizrachi faction began to think about leadership, the National Religious sector was also Religious Zionism not as minor partner to Mapai, characterized by other, contrasting tendencies. which politically and ideologically led the Israeli These tendencies, which attracted a great deal state and society, but as an alternative to Mapai of media and academic attention, consisted of (or part of an alternative) with a different political strengthening the religious commitments and and ideological vision, one that married religion behaviors of the Religious Zionist public and and nationalism.3 The contemporary Jewish Home adopting a more secluded and sectarian lifestyle. Party and its leadership continue this attempt to These behaviors stemmed from an outlook that unify religion and nationalism. was basically dialectical: The more the Religious This association with nationalism has resulted in Zionist public purified itself in terms of its religious a transformed Jewish theology. At the center of national lifestyle, the more salutary would its this theology stands the ascription of religious impact be on the general Israeli public. Ultimately, meaning to material, secular, pursuits and it envisioned a higher synthesis of religion and activities. Especially those constitutive of nation- nationalism in which both the religious and the jewish people policy institute 139 national components would be strong. Nevertheless, The fact that the Religious Zionist public found in day-to-day life, some members of Religious itself basically alone in its struggle against the Zionist community participated in a life style that government ordered dismantling of 17 settlements was removed from the general Jewish-Israeli one, and the evacuation of more than 8500 people in including living in exclusively national religious the 2005 disengagement from Gaza very much settlements and neighborhoods and enrolling reinforced the idea that its settlement policy and their children in the separate National Religious outlook had not “settled in the hearts” of the Israeli educational system. public. Thus, in the wake of the disengagement Members of the national religious public began to the idea of becoming more engaged with general question this approach in the 1990s with the advent Israeli society, more part of it, gained momentum. of the Oslo Accords, and, more generally, the rise and One aspect of this is gradual trend of integration strengthening of the "liberal citizenship discourse" into, and participation in, Israeli electronic media – and even more so in and arts. Along with the attempt to have a direct the wake of the Gaza impact,
Recommended publications
  • Yeshivat Derech Chaim Kiryat Gat American Friends of Sderot  Amutat Lapid the Max & Ruth Schwartz Hesder Institutions Mission Statement
    ech Chaim er K i D r t y a a v t i G h s a e t Y The Friedberg Community Initiative Program The Yedidut-Toronto Foundation Yeshivat Derech Chaim Kiryat Gat American Friends of Sderot Amutat Lapid The Max & Ruth Schwartz Hesder Institutions Mission Statement Giving back to the community is no burden on our students – it is the direct, inescapable consequence of their studies here. It is not in vain that our Yeshiva is called "Derech Chaim" – the "Path of Life". We make every effort to make it clear to our students that the Torah that they study here is not theoretical – it is geared is to lead and direct them to take those same high ideals and put them into practice in their daily lives - in their hobbies, careers and life-choices. The Rashbi Study Partners Program Twice a week, Kiryat Gat Hesder students go to study Talmud and Parshat Shavua with young students at the nearby "Rashbi" Mamlachti Dati elementary school. Due to its proximity our students can now engage in this activity twice a week and the young children are in turn encouraged to visit the Yeshiva as well. In general, these children come from very economically and religiously challenged backgrounds. Having a "big brother" from the local Hesder Yeshiva is invaluable in building their respect for Torah and connecting them to proper role models. Community Rabbinate Program Amit L’Mishpacha A number of our Rabbis also serve as the beloved The Family Associate Program spiritual leaders of different local congregations. In this context, they are busy giving talks and lectures as well as helping families in their community in various ways.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel's National Religious and the Israeli- Palestinian Conflict
    Leap of Faith: Israel’s National Religious and the Israeli- Palestinian Conflict Middle East Report N°147 | 21 November 2013 International Crisis Group Headquarters Avenue Louise 149 1050 Brussels, Belgium Tel: +32 2 502 90 38 Fax: +32 2 502 50 38 [email protected] Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... i Recommendations..................................................................................................................... iv I. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 II. Religious Zionism: From Ascendance to Fragmentation ................................................ 5 A. 1973: A Turning Point ................................................................................................ 5 B. 1980s and 1990s: Polarisation ................................................................................... 7 C. The Gaza Disengagement and its Aftermath ............................................................. 11 III. Settling the Land .............................................................................................................. 14 A. Bargaining with the State: The Kookists ................................................................... 15 B. Defying the State: The Hilltop Youth ........................................................................ 17 IV. From the Hills to the State ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Presented by the Washington Dc Jewish Community Center's Morris
    Presented by the Washington dC JeWish Community Center’s morris Cafritz Center for the arts · Co-Sponsored by the embassy of israel and Washington JeWish Week sunday monday tuesday Aaron & Cecile Goldman Theater AFI Silver Theatre Aaron & Cecile Goldman Theater Aaron & Cecile Goldman Theater Love and Religion: The Challenge Will Eisner: Portrait Human Failure In Search of the Bene Israel of Interfaith Relationships of a Sequential Artist E 6:00 pm and Rafting to Bombay E 10:30 am brunch, 11:30 am film E 12:15 pm Srugim E 6:15 pm The Worst Company in the World Broken Promise E 8:30 pm Shorts Program 1 with Quentin and Ferdinand E 5:45 pm Take Five: Queer Shorts, E 1:45 pm Ajami AFI Silver Theatre Good Stories 2009 WJFF Visionary Award E 8:15 pm The Girl on the Train E 8:30 pm Honoring Michael Verhoeven E 7:00 pm Screening of Nasty Girl Embassy of Ethiopia Mary and Max Goethe-Institut Washington E 3:30 pm The Name My Mother Gave Me E 9:00 pm From Swastika to Jim Crow E Noon Filmed by Yitzhak and Black Over White E Goethe-Institut Washington and The Green Dumpster Mystery 2:00 pm In Conversation Embassy of Switzerland E 6:15 pm with Michael Verhoeven Brothers Lost Islands E Noon E 7:00 pm E 8:30 pm Harold and Sylvia Greenberg Theatre Lost Islands 6 7 E 7:30 pm 8 sunday Aaron & Cecile Goldman Theater Avalon Theatre The Earth Cries Out The Jester E 11:30 am E 11:30 am FREE Room and a Half 18 KM E 1:45 pm with The Red Toy The Wedding Song E 2:00 pm E 5:00 pm Heart of Stone E 4:00 pm The Gift to Stalin CLOSING NIGHT FILM AND PARTY E 7:30 pm 13 thursday friday saturday Embassy of France Aaron & Cecile Goldman Theater Aaron & Cecile Goldman Theater A Matter of Size A Matter of Size My Mother’s Courage OPENING NIGHT FILM AND Party E 1:00 pm with The Legend of Mrs.
    [Show full text]
  • Leviathan Jewish Journal Is an Open Medium Through Which Jewish Students and Their Allies May Freely Express Their Opinions
    Spring 2012 Vol. 39-3 LeviathanJewish Journal Jewish Journal Statement of Intent Leviathan Jewish Journal is an open medium through which Jewish students and their allies may freely express their opinions. We are commited to responsibly representing the views of each individual author. Every quarter we aim to publish a full and balanced spectrum of media exploring Jewish identity and social issues. The opinions presented in this journal do not always represent the collective opinion of Leviathan’s staff, the organized Jewish community, or the University of California. Editor-in-Chief Art Director Aaron Giannini Karin Gold Production Manager Publisher Karin Gold Shani Chabansky Managing Editor Faculty Sponsor Savyonne Steindler Bruce Thompson Business Manager Contributors Karina Garcia Hanna Broad Shelby Backman Web Manager Sophia Smith Oren Gotesman Andrew Dunnigan Gabi Kirk Additonal Staff Members Anisha Mauze David Lee Amrit Sidhu Ephraim Margolin Allison Carlisle Jennine Grasso Matthew Davis Cover Art Karin Gold Letter From the Editor After a hectic and controversial year, the Leviathan Staff thought it would be beneficial to revisit the subject of what it means to be Jewish in today’s world. This is in no way a simple question, as the diversity of the Jewish people speaks to the fluid- ity of our identity. Are we the culmination of our history, inheriting monotheism through our holy lineage? Or are we just fingerprints, products of our ever-changing environment, blips on the cosmic stage? Are we grounded in our past, or is it our obligation to live in the present and look towards the future? We did not decide on our cover image this quarter without much deliberation.
    [Show full text]
  • Anti-Zionism and Antisemitism Cosmopolitan Reflections
    Anti-Zionism and Antisemitism Cosmopolitan Reflections David Hirsh Department of Sociology, Goldsmiths, University of London, New Cross, London SE14 6NW, UK The Working Papers Series is intended to initiate discussion, debate and discourse on a wide variety of issues as it pertains to the analysis of antisemitism, and to further the study of this subject matter. Please feel free to submit papers to the ISGAP working paper series. Contact the ISGAP Coordinator or the Editor of the Working Paper Series, Charles Asher Small. Working Paper Hirsh 2007 ISSN: 1940-610X © Institute for the Study of Global Antisemitism and Policy ISGAP 165 East 56th Street, Second floor New York, NY 10022 United States Office Telephone: 212-230-1840 www.isgap.org ABSTRACT This paper aims to disentangle the difficult relationship between anti-Zionism and antisemitism. On one side, antisemitism appears as a pressing contemporary problem, intimately connected to an intensification of hostility to Israel. Opposing accounts downplay the fact of antisemitism and tend to treat the charge as an instrumental attempt to de-legitimize criticism of Israel. I address the central relationship both conceptually and through a number of empirical case studies which lie in the disputed territory between criticism and demonization. The paper focuses on current debates in the British public sphere and in particular on the campaign to boycott Israeli academia. Sociologically the paper seeks to develop a cosmopolitan framework to confront the methodological nationalism of both Zionism and anti-Zionism. It does not assume that exaggerated hostility to Israel is caused by underlying antisemitism but it explores the possibility that antisemitism may be an effect even of some antiracist forms of anti- Zionism.
    [Show full text]
  • A Survey of Textbooks Most Commonly Used to Teach the Arab-Israeli
    A Critical Survey of Textbooks on the Arab-Israeli and Israeli-Palestinian Conflict Working Paper No. 1 │ April 2017 Uzi Rabi Chelsi Mueller MDC Working Paper Series The views expressed in the MDC Working Paper Series are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of the Moshe Dayan Center for Middle Eastern and African Studies or Tel Aviv University. MDC Working Papers have not undergone formal review and approval. They are circulated for discussion purposes only. Their contents should be considered preliminary and are not to be reproduced without the authors' permission. Please address comments and inquiries about the series to: Dr. Chelsi Mueller Research Fellow The MDC for Middle Eastern and African Studies Tel Aviv University Ramat Aviv, 6997801 Israel Email: [email protected] Tel: +972-3-640-9100 US: +1-617-787-7131 Fax: +972-3-641-5802 MDC Working Paper Series Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank the research assistants and interns who have contributed significantly to this research project. Eline Rosenhart was with the project from the beginning to end, cataloging syllabi, constructing charts, reading each text from cover to cover, making meticulous notes, transcribing meetings and providing invaluable editorial assistance. Rebekka Windus was a critical eye and dedicated consultant during the year-long reading phase of the project. Natasha Spreadborough provided critical comments and suggestions that were very instrumental during the reading phase of this project. Ben Mendales, the MDC’s project management specialist, was exceptionally receptive to the needs of the team and provided vital logistical support. Last but not least, we are deeply grateful to Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Privatizing Religion: the Transformation of Israel's
    Privatizing religion: The transformation of Israel’s Religious- Zionist community BY Yair ETTINGER The Brookings Institution is a nonprofit organization devoted to independent research and policy solutions. Its mission is to conduct high-quality, independent research and, based on that research, to provide innovative, practical recommendations for policymakers and the public. The conclusions and recommendations of any Brookings publication are solely those of its author(s), and do not reflect the views of the Institution, its management, or its other scholars. This paper is part of a series on Imagining Israel’s Future, made possible by support from the Morningstar Philanthropic Fund. The views expressed in this report are those of its author and do not represent the views of the Morningstar Philanthropic Fund, their officers, or employees. Copyright © 2017 Brookings Institution 1775 Massachusetts Avenue, NW Washington, D.C. 20036 U.S.A. www.brookings.edu Table of Contents 1 The Author 2 Acknowlegements 3 Introduction 4 The Religious Zionist tribe 5 Bennett, the Jewish Home, and religious privatization 7 New disputes 10 Implications 12 Conclusion: The Bennett era 14 The Center for Middle East Policy 1 | Privatizing religion: The transformation of Israel’s Religious-Zionist community The Author air Ettinger has served as a journalist with Haaretz since 1997. His work primarily fo- cuses on the internal dynamics and process- Yes within Haredi communities. Previously, he cov- ered issues relating to Palestinian citizens of Israel and was a foreign affairs correspondent in Paris. Et- tinger studied Middle Eastern affairs at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, and is currently writing a book on Jewish Modern Orthodoxy.
    [Show full text]
  • Sderot – the Central Hesder Yeshiva and the “Shluchot” Revolution!
    Sderot – The Central Hesder Yeshiva and the “Shluchot” Revolution! The Torah Revolution in Sderot The Central Max and Ruth Schwartz Hesder Yeshiva of Sderot was founded over 15 years ago and now has more than 400 students. The rapid growth of the Yeshiva despite the thousands of missiles aimed at Sderot, together with the construction of a magnificent campus has served to strengthen the spirit of all the residents and uplift the status of Torah throughout the region. Over the years Sderot has become just about the largest Hesder Yeshiva in Israel and is blessed with a very high religious and scholastic level. 400 strong in the main study hall Unique Outreach Affiliate Institutions The Rosh Yeshiva, Rabbi David Fendel, a literal powerhouse behind so many local projects - both spiritual and material – came on Aliyah from the United States to build both his home and a world of Torah in Sderot. In addition to building our main Hesder institution, Rabbi Fendel led a true revolution in the yeshiva world when he insisted on establishing and receiving official recognition for 2 affiliate institutions (“Shluchot” in Hebrew) serving a more varied clientele than other Hesder Yeshivot. Rav Fendel believed that with the right approach, with a warm and unique staff it would be possible to reach out and attract graduates of regular religious high schools and turn them into proud Torah-true Jews and soldiers imbued with deep faith and self- sacrifice. To achieve this goal Sderot has established two affiliates– Yeshivat Lev La’Daat also in Sderot led by Rabbi Shlomo Binyamin now numbering about 130 students and Yeshivat Derech Chaim in Kiryat Gat headed by Rabbi Amir Maman with over 70 students.
    [Show full text]
  • Religious Compromise in Israeli Schools Since 1953. PUB DATE 89 0 NOTE 6P
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 308 :34 SU 020 127 AUTHOR Parker, Franklin TITLE Religious Compromise in Israeli Schools since 1953. PUB DATE 89 0 NOTE 6p. PUB TYPE Reports - Research/Technical (143) -- Historical Materials (060) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC01 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Educational Change; *Educational Legislation; Educational Policy; Elementary Secondary Education; Foreign Countries; *Jews; *Religion; Religious Differences; Religious Education; *Religious Factors IDENTIFIERS Educational Ideologies; Educational Issues; *Israel; Israeli Arabs; Israelis; Jewish Studies ABSTRACT Jewish schools, before statehood in 1948, were run by political parties. The "General Stream" (1913), formed by the General Zionist and Revisionist parties, agreed to have secular subjects taught in European-like schools, and to forego formal religious instruction. The "Religious Stream" (1920), formed by Zionist religious parties,' focused on religious and Zionist emphases in its schools. The "Labor Stream" (1926) arose mainly among rural and urban workers, and was imbued with child- centered educational ideals. These three school systems were joined by a fourth group, the "Ultra-Orthodox Agudat Israel Stream" (1948), led by the most religiously demanding group of zealots. A religious and political compromise in 1953, which placed all schools under a Ministry of Education and Culture, is the basis for the five kinds of schools currently operating. State Secular schools enroll 65% of Jewish youths and are considered to be religiously neutral. State Religious schools enroll 25% of Jewish youths, teach the "Bible" as the Word of God, and emphasize the religious nature of holy days. Ultra-Orthodox schools enroll 6.5% of Jewish youths, are extremely religious, require "Bible" study, and are governed by religion in all aspects of life.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Ultra-Orthodox Political Parties in Israeli Democracy
    Luke Howson University of Liverpool The Role of Ultra-Orthodox Political Parties in Israeli Democracy Thesis submitted in accordance with the requirements of the University of Liverpool for the degree of Doctor in Philosophy By Luke Howson July 2014 Committee: Clive Jones, BA (Hons) MA, PhD Prof Jon Tonge, PhD 1 Luke Howson University of Liverpool © 2014 Luke Howson All Rights Reserved 2 Luke Howson University of Liverpool Abstract This thesis focuses on the role of ultra-orthodox party Shas within the Israeli state as a means to explore wider themes and divisions in Israeli society. Without underestimating the significance of security and conflict within the structure of the Israeli state, in this thesis the Arab–Jewish relationship is viewed as just one important cleavage within the Israeli state. Instead of focusing on this single cleavage, this thesis explores the complex structure of cleavages at the heart of the Israeli political system. It introduces the concept of a ‘cleavage pyramid’, whereby divisions are of different saliency to different groups. At the top of the pyramid is division between Arabs and Jews, but one rung down from this are the intra-Jewish divisions, be they religious, ethnic or political in nature. In the case of Shas, the religious and ethnic elements are the most salient. The secular–religious divide is a key fault line in Israel and one in which ultra-orthodox parties like Shas are at the forefront. They and their politically secular counterparts form a key division in Israel, and an exploration of Shas is an insightful means of exploring this division further, its history and causes, and how these groups interact politically.
    [Show full text]
  • Nationalism and Religion -- Take 2
    H-Nationalism Nationalism and Religion -- Take 2 Blog Post published by Yoav Peled on Monday, May 24, 2021 In this post Yoav Peled, Tel Aviv University, discusses the relations between nationalism and religion among Muslims and Jews in Israel. In March 2021 Israel held its fourth general election in two years, which resulted in the same deadlock between Benjamin Netanyahu’s populist supporters and his opponents as the previous three campaigns. (This is not an issue of left and right, as the anti-Netanyahu bloc includes several right- wing parties.) Right before the elections, the United Arab List (UAL), an Islamist political party which represents one of two affiliates of the Muslim Brotherhood in Israel (the other affiliate has been outlawed), split from the United List, a coalition of four Arab political parties espousing different shades of Palestinian nationalism. Upon leaving the United List, UAL’s leader, Mansour Abbas, a dentist by profession, declared that his party would be open to negotiate with either side of the political map, including Netanyahu’s bloc, the most nationalist, i.e., anti-Palestinian, political formation in Israel’s history. As it turned out, after the elections Netanyahu and his bloc were short two Knesset seats (out of 120) to form a governing coalition, and the UAL had four seats, which could have carried Netanyahu over the top. However, Religious Zionism, the most right-wing party in Netanyahu’s bloc, which gained six seats, refused to participate in a coalition that would depend on an Arab party, even if that party’s support will be only in the form of abstaining in the crucial vote in the Knesset.1 Religious Zionism Religious Zionism is a tendency within the Zionist movement, established in 1902.
    [Show full text]
  • Rearticulations of Enmity and Belonging in Postwar Sri Lanka
    BUDDHIST NATIONALISM AND CHRISTIAN EVANGELISM: REARTICULATIONS OF ENMITY AND BELONGING IN POSTWAR SRI LANKA by Neena Mahadev A dissertation submitted to Johns Hopkins University in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Baltimore, Maryland October, 2013 © 2013 Neena Mahadev All Rights Reserved Abstract: Based on two years of fieldwork in Sri Lanka, this dissertation systematically examines the mutual skepticism that Buddhist nationalists and Christian evangelists express towards one another in the context of disputes over religious conversion. Focusing on the period from the mid-1990s until present, this ethnography elucidates the shifting politics of nationalist perception in Sri Lanka, and illustrates how Sinhala Buddhist populists have increasingly come to view conversion to Christianity as generating anti-national and anti-Buddhist subjects within the Sri Lankan citizenry. The author shows how the shift in the politics of identitarian perception has been contingent upon several critical events over the last decade: First, the death of a Buddhist monk, which Sinhala Buddhist populists have widely attributed to a broader Christian conspiracy to destroy Buddhism. Second, following the 2004 tsunami, massive influxes of humanitarian aid—most of which was secular, but some of which was connected to opportunistic efforts to evangelize—unsettled the lines between the interested religious charity and the disinterested secular giving. Third, the closure of 25 years of a brutal war between the Sri Lankan government forces and the ethnic minority insurgent group, the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE), has opened up a slew of humanitarian criticism from the international community, which Sinhala Buddhist populist activists surmise to be a product of Western, Christian, neo-colonial influences.
    [Show full text]