DOCSLIB.ORG

50 Leading Women in Hedge Funds 2019

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
50 Leading Women in Hedge Funds 2019 FIFTY LEADING WOMEN IN HEDGE FUNDS 2019 IN ASSOCIATION WITH his is our seventh 50 Leading Women developed the first two corporate governance in Hedge Funds report. In an funds in emerging markets. Previous reports encouraging sign of the times, last have featured women from CIAM (Catherine year – after running it as a biennial Berjal); Cevian Capital (Friederike Helfer); Ides Tevent since 2010 – we took the decision that it Capital (Dianne McKeever) and Blue Harbour should be annual. Group (Tanisha Bellur and Lauren Taylor Wolfe, who has now launched her own firm, Impactive Just two of the women have featured in previous s the leading global provider of Capital, with seeding from pension fund reports. One nominee appears because she services to alternative funds CalSTRS). For the first time, we feature a Head has had a significant promotion; the other worldwide, EY is once again of ESG Engagement, at Third Point, and this is has moved to a larger company. Many of the proud to sponsor the 50 Leading likely to be a growing trend. Women have held WomenA in Hedge Funds report and to firms here: The Baupost Group; Bridgewater senior positions in corporate governance for at recognize this accomplished group of Associates; BlueMountain Capital Management; least 20 years, and the profile of these roles is women who are making their mark in the Capital Fund Management; Citadel; D. E. Shaw; industry. We congratulate all the honorees now rising. EY; GAM Systematic Cantab; Man Group; who have been selected by The Hedge Fund Maples Group; Pictet Asset Management; Journal – impressive and inspiring women Alternative credit managers have been Point72 and Simmons & Simmons are recurring who are leading by example. growing assets faster than most hedge fund fixtures because such companies are hiring managers, and we have started to receive more and promoting more women into senior roles. At EY, we have a steadfast commitment nominations for women working in private Companies featuring for the first time include: to diversity and inclusiveness and debt: we include Kirsten Bode from Muzinich in creating a culture where all people can Balyasny; BNP Paribas; Cartica Management; this report. experience a sense of belonging. This is Caxton Associates; Citco Fund Services (US) Inc; fundamental for building transformative Millennium Management; Third Point; Yaupon leaders to serve our clients and lead in our This report and the associated events are, of Capital Management LP and Wincrest Capital. communities. Diversity and inclusiveness course, partly a public relations exercise to is an important journey that we are proud attract more suitably qualified women to apply It is apt that EY is sponsoring the report to be on – one that creates innovation for jobs. Four HR professionals feature in as professional services firms appear to be and growth by maximizing the power of this report, and interestingly they have made leading the way in terms of gender equality. different perspectives. We hold our status horizontal career transitions into HR (which is in the DiversityInc Top 50 Hall of Fame in Approximately 50% of EY’s trainee intake and dubbed business development at one firm) from the highest regard and are committed to 30% of its partners are now women. At law firms continual progress. Foremost, we know prior roles in four different areas: legal; equity the trainee intake is similarly evenly balanced. that an inclusive culture that values our analysis; investment and prime brokerage sales. This report includes lawyers from Simmons people’s unique perspectives is critical to & Simmons in London, Matheson in Dublin, drive quality and innovation – and a better In the broader investment and alternatives and Maples in Cayman and London, where the working world for all of us. industry, there are also positive signs of London office joint managing partner is now imbalances being redressed. Over 50% of those Please join us in recognizing and Heidi de Vries. taking the CFA exam in China are now women, congratulating these 50 truly exceptional and indeed the CFA Institute will very soon, women – not because they are women, These percentages are generally much lower but because they exemplify success and and for the first time, be helmed by a woman, in the hedge fund industry, but there are some leadership, and are a beacon to those who Margaret Franklin (formerly of BNY Mellon). encouraging signs of change. For instance, 40 follow in their footsteps. The CAIA Association is led by Bill Kelly, but per cent of the 49 people in Point72’s Summer it has many women in senior roles, including Academy class of 2019 are women. In the full its regional leaders in Asia and Europe. Trade time Academy class, they represent 25 per cent associations as well have women in senior of the 36 recruits. than investment or portfolio manager, so tallies roles: AIMA’s local leaders in the US and Canada based on the latter label will overlook many. are women. As women appear to be most under- represented in quantitative and technology- Headhunters have brought it to our attention The standard disclaimer applies. This report is oriented roles, we have made a special effort that data scientists are red hot right now. The not a ranking per se, but rather a selection of to prioritise success stories from firms quants are the only women in this report who examples of senior women intended to inspire including: Capital Fund Management; GAM have doctorates. The deficit of women in STEM others. Many of those omitted from this report Systematic Cantab; Man Group; Millennium (life sciences apart) is partly due to educational are worthy candidates and may well feature in Management, Systematica Investments and choices typically made in teenage years. Many future reports. We have also received a large Tudor Investments Corporation, where the firms that have featured in these reports over number of nominations for women who do not CTO is notably a woman. (Women may be even the years have developed initiatives designed to yet seem quite senior enough, but they could more under-represented in the technology help girls catch the maths and computing bugs. well “graduate” to leading women status quite industry than in finance, according to some soon as they ascend the career ladder. Many estimates). It is worth noting that investment Women are also under-represented in activist female portfolio managers running very small professionals working in systematic and investing, but we continue to find new names amounts of money (sometimes outside a fund or quantitative firms may sometimes have job here. This report features two from Cartica corporate structure) could also be considered if titles such as “researcher” or “scientist” rather Capital, whose co-founder, Teresa Barger, they grow assets, form or join a firm. 2 Emily Alejos Ella Hoxha Managing Director and CIO, Cartica Management, LLC, Washington, DC Senior Investment Manager, Global Bonds Team, Pictet Asset Management, London Elizabeth Appleford Head of Human Resources, Marshall Wace, London Margaret Jones Principal and Portfolio Manager, Taconic Capital Advisors, New York Teresa Barger Co-Founder and CEO, Cartica Management, LLC, Washington, DC Harjit Kaur London Co-Head, Funds & Investment Management, Maples Group, Barbara Ann Bernard London Founder, CIO, Wincrest Capital, Bahamas Megan Kelly Claudia Bertolino Senior Trader, The Baupost Group, Boston Managing Director and Global Head of Business Development, Citco Fund Services (USA) Inc, New York Annie Lerner Chief Financial Officer, PSAM, New York Jennifer Blake Managing Director and Global Head of Business Development, Balyasny Marina Lutova Meyers Asset Management, Chicago Portfolio Manager and Head of Fundamental Relative Value Credit, Citadel, New York Kirsten Bode Co-Head Private Debt, Pan-Europe, Muzinich & Co., Zurich/London Erin Miles Research Team Lead, Bridgewater Associates, Connecticut Giuliana Bordigoni Head of Alternative Markets, Man AHL, London Jessica O’Mary Partner, Ropes & Gray, New York Jessica Bowden FIC Business Manager, Millennium Management, New York Archana Parekh Portfolio Manager, Millennium Management, Singapore Michelle Brouhard Partner and Head of Commodities, Yaupon Capital Management LP, New Gwyneth Rees York Partner, Funds & Investment Management, Maples Group, Cayman Islands Soraya Chabarek Global Head of Distribution and Business Development, CQS, London Michelle Ridge Asset Management and Investment Funds Partner, Matheson, Dublin, Julie Chang Ireland Managing Director and COO, Balyasny Asset Management, Asia offices, Hong Kong Dava Ritchea CFO, Partner, BlueMountain Capital Management, New York Nadia Cobalovic Head of Relationship Management, Americas, Northern Trust, Chicago Alyson Rodriguez FICC Sales and Relationship Management, Citadel Securities, London Deborah Cohen Malka Managing Director, AlbaCore Capital, London Miriam Roiter Managing Director, CTO, Tudor Investment Corporation, Stamford, Sarah Crabb Connecticut Managing Associate (Financial Services – Funds), Simmons & Simmons LLP, London Virginie Saade Head of Government and Regulatory Policy for Europe, Citadel, London Sarah Davidoff Partner, Ropes & Gray, New York Dr Camilla Schelpe Senior Scientist, GAM Systematic Cantab, Cambridge, UK Elissa Doyle Chief Communications Officer and Head of ESG Engagement, Third Point Tess Shih LLC, New York Executive Director, Investor Relations, Capital Fund Management, New York Marianna Fassinotti Managing Director, The D. E. Shaw Group, London Julie
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Granular Nature of Large Institutional Investors
    NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES THE GRANULAR NATURE OF LARGE INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS Itzhak Ben-David Francesco Franzoni Rabih Moussawi John Sedunov Working Paper 22247 http://www.nber.org/papers/w22247 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 May 2016, Revised July 2020 Special acknowledgments go to Robin Greenwood and David Thesmar for thoughtful and extensive comments. We also thank Sergey Chernenko, Kent Daniel (NBER discussant), Itamar Drechsler, Thierry Foucault, Xavier Gabaix, Denis Gromb, Andrew Karolyi, Alberto Plazzi, Tarun Ramadorai (AFA discussant), Martin Schmalz, René Stulz, and Fabio Trojani as well as participants at the NBER Summer Institute (Risk of Financial Institutions) and seminars at Cornell University, the Interdisciplinary Center Herzliya, University of Texas at Austin, Georgia State University, Tilburg University, Maastricht University, HEC Paris, USI Lugano, Villanova University, The Ohio State University, the Bank for International Settlements, NBER Risk of Financial Institutions Summer Institute, and American Finance Association for helpful comments. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peer-reviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies official NBER publications. © 2016 by Itzhak Ben-David, Francesco Franzoni, Rabih Moussawi, and John Sedunov. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit, including © notice, is given to the source. The Granular Nature of Large Institutional Investors Itzhak Ben-David, Francesco Franzoni, Rabih Moussawi, and John Sedunov NBER Working Paper No.
    [Show full text]
  • Institutional Investor Study 2019
    Institutional Investor Study 2019 Geopolitics and investor expectations Marketing material for professional investors and advisers only Schroders Institutional Investor Study 2019 | Geopolitics and investor expectations 01 Contents 02 Executive summary 10 Investment goals • Generating income comes out on top 03 Portfolio performance Increasing allocations to fixed income • Geopolitical concerns dominate the investment landscape 12 Growing appetite for innovation • The quest for new, customised solutions 05 Return expectations • De-risking through LDI • Optimistic return expectations despite an uncertain landscape 14 Risk management strategies • The dominance of diversification 08 Staying strategic • Strategic asset allocation 16 About the Study driving decision making • Focus on long-term holding periods Schroders Institutional Investor Study 2019 | Geopolitics and investor expectations 02 Executive summary Geopolitical turbulence and the threat of a However, the most important investment Schroders’ third annual global economic slowdown are seen as the objective for investors for the next most important influences on a portfolio’s 12 months is meeting income and yield investment performance for the next 12 requirements (66%). Capital preservation Institutional Investor Study months. Since our inaugural Study in 2017, and generating high risk-adjusted returns we have seen investors become more rank second and third, illustrating how This Study analyses the investment perspectives of 650 institutional concerned about how world events are institutions are looking to more defensive investors, collectively responsible for $25.4 trillion in assets and from affecting growth (32% in 2017 vs. 52% in 2019). assets to de-risk portfolios during heightened 20 locations across the world. The Study provides a snapshot of some This is also evidenced by a steady decline in geopolitical uncertainty.
    [Show full text]
  • Form ADV Part 2A – Disclosure Brochure
    Prosperity Advisory Group LLC Form ADV Part 2A – Disclosure Brochure Effective: October 12, 2020 This Form ADV Part 2A (“Disclosure Brochure”) provides information about the qualifications and business practices of Prosperity Advisory Group LLC (“PAG” or the “Advisor”). If you have any questions about the content of this Disclosure Brochure, please contact the Advisor at (585) 381-5900. PAG is a Registered Investment Advisor with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The information in this Disclosure Brochure has not been approved or verified by the SEC or by any state securities authority. Registration of an investment advisor does not imply any specific level of skill or training. This Disclosure Brochure provides information about PAG to assist you in determining whether to retain the Advisor. Additional information about PAG and its Advisory Persons is available on the SEC’s website at www.adviserinfo.sec.gov by searching with the Advisor’s firm name or CRD# 310720. Prosperity Advisory Group LLC 50 Square Drive, Suite 220, Victor, NY 14564 Phone: (585) 381-5900 * Fax: (585) 381-0478 https://prosperityadv.com Item 2 – Material Changes Form ADV 2 is divided into two parts: Part 2A (the "Disclosure Brochure") and Part 2B (the "Brochure Supplement"). The Disclosure Brochure provides information about a variety of topics relating to an Advisor’s business practices and conflicts of interest. The Brochure Supplement provides information about the Advisory Persons of PAG. PAG believes that communication and transparency are the foundation of its relationship with Clients and will continually strive to provide you with complete and accurate information at all times.
    [Show full text]
  • Private Debt in Asia: the Next Frontier?
    PRIVATE DEBT IN ASIA: THE NEXT FRONTIER? PRIVATE DEBT IN ASIA: THE NEXT FRONTIER? We take a look at the fund managers and investors turning to opportunities in Asia, analyzing funds closed and currently in market, as well as the investors targeting the region. nstitutional investors in 2018 are have seen increased fundraising success in higher than in 2016. While still dwarfed Iincreasing their exposure to private recent years. by the North America and Europe, Asia- debt strategies at a higher rate than focused fundraising has carved out a ever before, with many looking to both 2017 was a strong year for Asia-focused significant niche in the global private debt diversify their private debt portfolios and private debt fundraising, with 15 funds market. find less competed opportunities. Beyond reaching a final close, raising an aggregate the mature and competitive private debt $6.4bn in capital. This is the second highest Sixty percent of Asia-focused funds closed markets in North America and Europe, amount of capital raised targeting the in 2017 met or exceeded their initial target credit markets in Asia offer a relatively region to date and resulted in an average size including SSG Capital Partners IV, the untapped reserve of opportunity, and with fund size of $427mn. Asia-focused funds second largest Asia-focused fund to close the recent increase in investor interest accounted for 9% of all private debt funds last year, securing an aggregate $1.7bn, in this area, private debt fund managers closed in 2017, three-percentage points 26% more than its initial target.
    [Show full text]
  • The Outlook Newsletter
    September 20, 2018 IN THIS ISSUE… Making Sense of the Changing Structure of What has changed in the U.S. Equity Markets U.S. equity markets? Why this is not your parents’ stock and bond market – Part II How is the investment landscape changing? “The underlying principles of sound investment should not alter from decade to What do these changes decade, but the application of these principles must be adapted to significant mean for investors? changes in the financial mechanisms and climate.” - Benjamin Graham, investor and professor widely acknowledged as the “father How is ARS addressing the of value investing” changes in the structure of the market? We have always viewed the markets as a medium of exchange, swapping dollars for shares of businesses understanding that the opportunity to build long-term capital lies in the discrepancy between the real worth of a business and its stock price as determined by the auction market. Our focus is to own a relatively small number of the best-positioned, best-valued companies in the market, and not the market itself. Investments are made in client portfolios with a view to holding them for the medium to longer-term believing The opportunity to build long- that these companies are the beneficiaries of the secular trends driving the term capital lies in the global economy. Before committing capital, our research must produce a discrepancy between the real clear picture of those investments that are deemed to offer the most cash worth of a business and its flow, assets and earnings for the fewest dollars invested.
    [Show full text]
  • Marshall Wace Ucits Funds Plc Annual Report and Audited Financial
    MARSHALL WACE UCITS FUNDS PLC ANNUAL REPORT AND AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014 MARSHALL WACE UCITS FUNDS PLC AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS For the year ended 30 June 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE COMPANY INFORMATION 2 - 4 DIRECTORS ’ REPORT 5 - 7 STATEMENT OF DIRECTORS ’ RESPONSIBILITIES 8 CUSTODIAN ’S REPORT 9 STATEMENT OF CUSTODIAN ’S RESPONSIBILITIES 10 INVESTMENT MANAGER ’S REPORT 11 - 12 INDEPENDENT AUDITORS ’ REPORT 13 - 14 STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION 15 STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME 18 STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS ATTRIBUTABLE TO HOLDERS OF REDEEMABLE PARTICIPATING SHARES 19 CASH FLOW STATEMENT 20 NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 21 - 55 SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS 56 - 80 ADDITIONAL INFORMATI ON 81 MARSHALL WACE UCITS FUNDS PLC COMPANY INFORMATION DIRECTORS Ronan Daly* David Hammond Linburgh Martin* Robert Bovet* All the Directors are non-executive Directors *Independent director REGISTERED OFFICE 33 Sir John Rogerson ’s Quay Dublin 2 Ireland Registration number : 465375 INVESTMENT MANAGER , PROMOTER Marshall Wace LLP AND DISTRIBUTOR 13 th Floor , The Adelphi Building 1-11 John Adam Street London WC2N 6HT England ADMINISTRATOR Citco Fund Services (Ireland) Limited Custom House Plaza , Block 6 International Financial Services Centre Dublin 1 Ireland CUSTODIAN J.P. Morgan Bank (Ireland) plc J.P. Morgan House International Financial Services Centre Dublin 1 Ireland PRINCIPAL COUNTERPARTIES Deutsche Bank AG London Winchester House 1 Great Winchester Street London EC2N 2DB England J.P. Morgan 10 Aldermanbury London EC2V 7RF England UBS AG 1 Finsbury Avenue London EC2M 2PP England 2 MARSHALL WACE UCITS FUNDS PLC COMPANY INFORMATION (Continued) PRINCIPAL COUNTERPARTIES (Continued) Barclays Bank plc 5 The North Colonnade Canary Wharf London E14 4BB England HSBC Bank Plc 8 Canada Square Canary Wharf London E14 5HQ England Citco Bank Nederland N.V.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Gina Rinehart 2. Anthony Pratt & Family • 3. Harry Triguboff
    1. Gina Rinehart $14.02billion from Resources Chairman – Hancock Prospecting Residence: Perth Wealth last year: $20.01b Rank last year: 1 A plunging iron ore price has made a big dent in Gina Rinehart’s wealth. But so vast are her mining assets that Rinehart, chairman of Hancock Prospecting, maintains her position as Australia’s richest person in 2015. Work is continuing on her $10billion Roy Hill project in Western Australia, although it has been hit by doubts over its short-term viability given falling commodity prices and safety issues. Rinehart is pressing ahead and expects the first shipment late in 2015. Most of her wealth comes from huge royalty cheques from Rio Tinto, which mines vast swaths of tenements pegged by Rinehart’s late father, Lang Hancock, in the 1950s and 1960s. Rinehart's wealth has been subject to a long running family dispute with a court ruling in May that eldest daughter Bianca should become head of the $5b family trust. 2. Anthony Pratt & Family $10.76billion from manufacturing and investment Executive Chairman – Visy Residence: Melbourne Wealth last year: $7.6billion Rank last year: 2 Anthony Pratt’s bet on a recovering United States economy is paying off. The value of his US-based Pratt Industries has surged this year thanks to an improving manufacturing sector and a lower Australian dollar. Pratt is also executive chairman of box maker and recycling business Visy, based in Melbourne. Visy is Australia’s largest private company by revenue and the biggest Australian-owned employer in the US. Pratt inherited the Visy leadership from his late father Richard in 2009, though the firm’s ownership is shared with sisters Heloise Waislitz and Fiona Geminder.
    [Show full text]
  • Arbitrage Pricing Theory∗
    ARBITRAGE PRICING THEORY∗ Gur Huberman Zhenyu Wang† August 15, 2005 Abstract Focusing on asset returns governed by a factor structure, the APT is a one-period model, in which preclusion of arbitrage over static portfolios of these assets leads to a linear relation between the expected return and its covariance with the factors. The APT, however, does not preclude arbitrage over dynamic portfolios. Consequently, applying the model to evaluate managed portfolios contradicts the no-arbitrage spirit of the model. An empirical test of the APT entails a procedure to identify features of the underlying factor structure rather than merely a collection of mean-variance efficient factor portfolios that satisfies the linear relation. Keywords: arbitrage; asset pricing model; factor model. ∗S. N. Durlauf and L. E. Blume, The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, forthcoming, Palgrave Macmillan, reproduced with permission of Palgrave Macmillan. This article is taken from the authors’ original manuscript and has not been reviewed or edited. The definitive published version of this extract may be found in the complete The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics in print and online, forthcoming. †Huberman is at Columbia University. Wang is at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and the McCombs School of Business in the University of Texas at Austin. The views stated here are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York or the Federal Reserve System. Introduction The Arbitrage Pricing Theory (APT) was developed primarily by Ross (1976a, 1976b). It is a one-period model in which every investor believes that the stochastic properties of returns of capital assets are consistent with a factor structure.
    [Show full text]
  • Vulture Hedge Funds Attack California
    JUNE 2019 HEDGE PAPERS No. 67 VULTURE HEDGE FUNDS ATTACK CALIFORNIA "Quick profits for Wall Street" versus safe, sustainable, affordable energy PG&E was plunged into bankruptcy after decades of irresponsible corporate practices led to massive wildfires and billions in new liabilities. Some of the most notorious hedge fund vultures are using their role as investors to make sure PG&E’s bankruptcy leads to big profits for their firms—at the expense of ratepayers, public safety and the environment. CONTENTS 4 | Vulture Hedge Funds Attack 10 | Meet the Billionaires and Vultures Preying on PG&E – Andrew Feldstein – Joshua S Friedman – Paul Singer – Dan Loeb – Jay Wintrob – Seth Klarman – Richard Barrera 17 | How Californias Will Get Hurt – Impact on Public Safety – Impact on Ratepayers – box: Lessons from Puerto Rico 20 | Sustainability / Climate 22 | Protect Californias —And All Americans—From Predatory Hedge Funds 24 | Hedge Funds Should Be Illegal – table: Hedge Funds That Own One Million or More Shares of PG&E 28 | About Hedge Clippers 29 | Press + General Inquiry Contacts MEET HEDGE FUNDS PUTTING THEIR 1 BILLIONS TO WORK IN HARMFUL WAYS Over three dozen hedge funds are attacking California’s biggest utility. SEVEN BILLIONAIRES AND VULTURES are leading the charge. They're treating control of PG&E as up for grabs while climate crisis wildfires rage and customers pay through the nose. The Answer: Outlaw hedge funds. Andrew Feldstein CEO, BlueMountain Capital 2 3 4 Paul Singer Dan Loeb Jay Wintrob Elliott Management Third PointCapital Oaktree
    [Show full text]
  • Pension Fund Investment in Hedge Funds", OECD Working Papers on Insurance and Private Pensions, No
    Please cite this paper as: Stewart, F. (2007), "Pension Fund Investment in Hedge Funds", OECD Working Papers on Insurance and Private Pensions, No. 12, OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/086456868358 OECD Working Papers on Insurance and Private Pensions No. 12 Pension Fund Investment in Hedge Funds Fiona Stewart* JEL Classification: G11, G18, G23, J31 *OECD, France PENSION FUND INVESTMENT IN HEDGE FUNDS Fiona Stewart September 2007 OECD WORKING PAPER ON INSURANCE AND PRIVATE PENSIONS No. 12 ——————————————————————————————————————— Financial Affairs Division, Directorate for Financial and Enterprise Affairs Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 2 Rue André Pascal, Paris 75116, France www.oecd.org/daf/fin www.oecd.org/daf/fin/wp 1 ABSTRACT/RÉSUMÉ Pension fund investment in hedge funds Having outlined the potential concerns relating to pension fund investment in hedge funds, the OECD carried out a survey to investigate what information pension fund regulators have on these investments and how they are being controlled. The survey confirms that pension fund regulators have little information regarding how pension funds in their jurisdiction are investing in hedge fund products (in terms of size of investments, the types of hedge funds pension funds are exposed and to what type of product). Only the Slovak Republic and Mexico (for the mandatory system) prevent pension funds from investing in hedge funds. Although the level of such investment is still very low in other countries, it is almost universally expected to increase. Few countries impose specific quantitative investment restrictions on pension fund investment in hedge funds, with most regulators exercising control via general investment restrictions and requirements (for diversification, transparency, through the prudent person rule etc.).
    [Show full text]
  • AG Capital Management Partners, L.P. Commodity Trading Advisor
    AG Capital Management Partners, L.P. Commodity Trading Advisor CTA Spotlight: AG Capital Management Partners, L.P. August 2020 Trading futures and options involves substantial risk of loss and is not suitable for all investors. There is no guarantee of profit no matter who is managing your money. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results. An investor must read and understand the CTA's current disclosure document before investing. Impressive Performance AG Capital’s managed account program is the Discretionary Global Macro Program (“Program”). Ending March 2020, the Program’s cumulative return has outperformed the S&P by over 400% since its inception in October 2014 (247% vs. 47%). Even before the first quarter of 2020’s plunge in stocks, the Program had performed very well. During one of stocks’ best runs in history, ending in December 2019, AG Capital's cumulative return of 161% strongly outperformed the S&P’s cumulative return of 82%. Be advised that past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results. Discretionary Global Macro Program (October 2014 - August 2020) Compound ROR 25% Cumulative Return 276% Worst Drawdown 25% (February 2016 – January 2017) Best 36 Month Period 131% (May 1, 2017 – April 30, 2017) Worst 36 Month Period 12% (December 1, 2015 – November 30, 2018) Average 36 Month Period 68% (October 2014 – August 2020) AG Capital VS. S&P 500 TR* (October 2104 through August 2020) AG Capital S&P 500 TR Annualized Compounded ROR 25% 12% Cumulative Return 276% 100% Worst Cumulative Drawdown 25% 20% Program’s Performance During S&P Losing Months The risk of loss in futures and options trading is substantial no matter who is managing money.
    [Show full text]
  • Securitization & Hedge Funds
    SECURITIZATION & HEDGE FUNDS: COLLATERALIZED FUND OBLIGATIONS SECURITIZATION & HEDGE FUNDS: CREATING A MORE EFFICIENT MARKET BY CLARK CHENG, CFA Intangis Funds AUGUST 6, 2002 INTANGIS PAGE 1 SECURITIZATION & HEDGE FUNDS: COLLATERALIZED FUND OBLIGATIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................................................ 3 PROBLEM.................................................................................................................................................... 4 SOLUTION................................................................................................................................................... 5 SECURITIZATION..................................................................................................................................... 5 CASH-FLOW TRANSACTIONS............................................................................................................... 6 MARKET VALUE TRANSACTIONS.......................................................................................................8 ARBITRAGE................................................................................................................................................ 8 FINANCIAL ENGINEERING.................................................................................................................... 8 TRANSPARENCY......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]