DOCSLIB.ORG

The Sedbergh School Politics and Law Timeline

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Sedbergh School Politics and Law Timeline Sir John Otway John Charlesworth William Ainslie Frank Ridley Sir Hilary Scott H Montgomery Hyde c. 1630 1824-33 1842-1848 Lupton House 1911-15 School House 1919-24 Powell House 1921-25 The Sedbergh School Trained to be a lawyer at Cambridge 1636. An ardent Royalist involved in A colliery owner and MP for Wakefield 1857 and Conservative politician, magistrate, One of the founders of the Marxian League in President of the Law Society Barrister, Ulster Unionist MP and author. Joined the British Army Intelligence the activities to bring Charles II to the throne, Charles appointed him 1859. Defeated by his Liberal opponent, William ironmaster and stockbroker. MP for 1930, he then joined the Independent Labour 1966-67. Corps in 1939 and was commissioned into MI6. Lost his seat in the House of Politics and Law Timeline Vice-Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster and Chancellor of the Leatham, at the 1859 general election both he and North Lonsdale Party writing regularly in their paper. From Commons in 1959 as a result of campaigning for County of Durham. Knighted in 1673 or 74. Died in 1693 and buried in Leatham were subsequently found to have conducted 1885-92. 1925 to 1964, he spoke every week at Speakers’ homosexual law reform. In 1972 wrote the first history of “Many Sedberghians have made enormous contributions to public life St Andrew’s Church, Sedbergh. extensive bribery during the campaign. Corner in London’s Hyde Park. homosexuality in Great Britain & Ireland, ‘The Other Love’. and to the communities and constituencies which they have served. Lord Bingham is widely regarded as the greatest Judge of the modern era. He, in particular, and countless other Sedberghians, only a few of whom can be featured in this timeline have had, and in some cases Gerrard Lowther John Lowther, 1st Viscount of Lonsdale, The Right Honourable Sir Alan Chambre Edward Eyre Sir John Willison, TD Kt OBE QPM Charles Peat Sir William Wavell Wakefield, Philip Mason, OBE CIE Viscount Bracken of 1550-1560 2nd Baronet, PC FRS c. 1746 1829-30 Sedgwick House 1898-1902 Sedgwick House 1905-10 1st Baron Wakefield of Kendal Lupton House 1919-24 Christchurch (Brendan) continue to have, a significant impact on the administration of justice An eminent Counsel and Bencher of c. 1668-70 In 1767 he was called to the bar and went A land explorer of the Australian continent Sir Francis Sharp Powell, 1st Baronet Joined City of London Police in 1933 and A Conservative politician, accountant and School House 1912-16 Had a distinguished career in School House 1920 and/or on the legal profession and on society at large.” Lincoln’s Inn and High Sherriff of Twice MP for Westmorland between 1677 into the northern circuit. Elected to the and colonial administrator. 1848-1853, he 1843-46 served with RNVR 1943-46. Chief cricketer. In 1931 he was elected as MP for A Conservative politician, rugby the Civil Service in India until Working closely with Cumberland in 1592. The Lowther bench of Gray’s Inn in served as Lieutenant-Governor of New Constable of Berwick, Roxburgh & Selkirk, Darlington. During WW2 he served as Independence in 1947. His Honour Judge John Walford and 1696. In 1688 he was serviceable in A Conservative politician who sat in the union player for Harlequins and Churchill, he was made MP family would appear to have been securing Cumberland and Westmorland for 1781 and in 1783 filled Munster Province in New Zealand. From House of Commons between 1863 and Worcestershire Constabulary and West Principal Private Secretary to PM Winston England and President of the Rugby Well-known as an author of a for Paddington in 1929, a supporters of Mary Queen of Scots. King William III and was appointed to the the annual office of 1854 he was Governor of several Caribbean 1910. He was one of Sedbergh School’s Mercia Constabulary. Appointed a Deputy Churchill. 1945, he served as Parliamentary Football Union. In 1935 he became great many books about India post he held for 16 years. In 1550’s 1910’s 1960’s Involved in various plots in Elizabeth I’s Privy Council in 1689. In 1690 he was first treasurer. 1796 he was island colonies. He was a controversial greatest benefactors and was the Lieutenant for Worcestershire. Received the Secretary to the Minister of National Conservative MP for Swindon. At and also for his pioneering 1940 became Parliamentary Helsby, Baron Helsby (Laurence), GCB KBE reign including “The Rising in the North” Lord of the Treasury and was appointed recorder of Governor of Jamaica when the Morant Bay Chairman of Governors 1874-1914. QPM in 1968; knighted in 1970; Knight of Insurance. Played the 1945 general election, he moved work in promoting the study of Private Secretary to Churchill and in 1941 was 1922-26 1600’s 1920’s 1970’s and one led by the Duke of Norfolk with Lord Privy Seal from 1699 until Lancaster. Worked at the Rebellion took place – a the Order of St John in 1973. first-class cricket for to St Marylebone. Knighted in 1944 racial and minority problems made Minister of Information, a post he held Joined the Civil Service in 1946. In 1963, he his brother, Richard. They managed to his death in 1700. court of common pleas major turning point in Oxford University and and in 1963 was raised to the as the founding director of the until the end of the Second World War. After was made joint Permanent Secretary to the 1700’s 1930’s 1980’s extricate themselves and survived. 1800-15. Jamaica’s history. Middlesex. peerage as Baron Wakefield of Institute of Race Relations. WW2 he was made First Lord of the Admiralty. Treasury and Head of the Home Civil Kendal. A generous benefactor to the School and was Service. Made a Knight Commander of the 1940’s 1990’s Chairman of Governors 1951-58. Order of the British Empire in 1955; awarded 1800’s Knight Grand Cross of the Order of the Bath in 1963; made a life peer in 1968. 1900’s 1950’s 2000’s Bill Carritt Sir Robert Rhodes James Lupton House 1922-27 Lord Bingham of Cornhill (Tom), KG PC QC James MacColl Lupton House 1946-52 Sir Russell Fairgrieve, CBE TD Sir Hugh Cortazzi, GCMG MA BA Communist, lecturer and poet. Air-lifted home from Winder House 1947-52 Sedgwick House 1922-27 Historian and Conservative MP. 1955-64, worked School House 1937-42 Sedgwick House 1936-41 WW2 to stand as Westminster Abbey Communist Judge and jurist. He served in the highest Air Vice-Marshal Peter Furniss, DFC Glencairn Balfour Paul, CMG Sir John Robertson Appointed a Justice of the Peace in 1938. in the Clerk’s Department of the House of The Honourable Sir Michael Sachs, KSS Parliamentary Under-Secretary of Diplomat, businessman, academic, author and The Honourable Lord Grieve (Bertie) VRD candidate in the 1945 general election and was judicial offices of the UK as Master of the School House 1933-37 Hart House 1931-36 Dunn Crichton Mayor of Paddington 1947-49. At the 1950 Commons. 1976, became a Conservative MP for Sedgwick House 1945-50 State for Scotland 1979-81 and a Japanologist. Left the RAF in 1947 and joined Winder House 1931-35 elected to Westminster council. Rolls, Lord Chief Justice and as Senior Solicitor and senior Royal Air Force After WW2 he served in the Winder House 1926-31 general election he was elected MP for Cambridge, a seat until his retirement in 1992. In 1993 he was the first solicitor to be appointed Sir Christopher Hewetson, TD MA DL Member of the Council of Europe. the Foreign Office. 1975 he was appointed In 1964 he was appointed Sheriff Principal 1946, he was one of five Law Lord before his retirement when he officer. He served as Director of Legal Sudan Political Service as a District Recorder of Manchester; Widnes and held the seat until his death in Parliamentary Private Secretary at the Foreign as a High Court judge and assigned to the Lupton House 1943-48 Chairman of the Conservative Party in Deputy Under-Secretary of State. 1980, of Renfrew and Argyll. A judge of the Communists tried at the Old focused on his work as a teacher and Services for the RAF and was Head of Commissioner, before joining the 1967 appointed one of the 1971. 1964-69 he was Parliamentary Office. Knighted in 1991. Queen’s Bench Division, receiving a knighthood. President Liverpool Law Society in Scotland 1975-80. appointed as Her Majesty’s Ambassador to Courts of Appeal of Guernsey and Jersey Bailey for leading a campaign The Sedbergh Bench lecturer in human rights laws. 1525 the RAF Legal Branch from Diplomatic Service in 1955. Appointed Justices of Her Majesty’s Secretary to the Minister for Housing and Also became an honorary bencher at the Middle 1976, President National Law Society Appointed a CBE in Japan where he served until 1984 and was 1971-72. In 1972 he became a judge of which put homeless families into From left to right: D.R. Wood, R.P. Lowden, Society President 1978-1982. Ambassador to Iraq in 1969, Ambassador High Court of Justice. Local Government. Temple and an honorary member of the Law in 1983. Became Knight Bachelor in 1974 and knighted in appointed GCMG (Knight Grand Cross of the Supreme Courts of Scotland. He was empty luxury flats. Until the T.D.T. Hodson, J. de G. Walford, T. Hewitt 2010-12. to Jordan in 1972 and Ambassador to Society in 1993.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2 Legal System of Scotland
    Legal System of 2 Scotland Yvonne McLaren and Josephine Bisacre This chapter discusses the formal sources of Scots law – answering the question of where the law gets its binding authority from. The chapter considers the role played by human rights in the Scottish legal system and their importance both for individuals and for businesses. While most com- mercial contracts are fulfilled and do not end up in court, some do, and sometimes businesses are sued for negligence, and they may also fall foul of the criminal law. Therefore the latter part of the chapter discusses the civil and criminal courts of Scotland and the personnel that work in the justice system. The Scottish legal system is also set in its UK and European context, and the chapter links closely with Chapters 3 and 4, where two rather dif- ferent legal systems – those in Dubai and Malaysia – are explored, in order to provide some international comparisons. The formal sources of Scots Law: from where does the law derive its authority? What is the law and why should we obey it? These are important ques- tions. Rules come in many different guises. There are legal rules and other rules that may appear similar in that they invoke a sense of obligation, such as religious rules, ethical or moral rules, and social rules. People live by religious or moral codes and consider themselves bound by them. People honour social engagements because personal relationships depend on this. However, legal rules are different in that the authority of the state is behind them and if they are not honoured, ultimately the state will step in 20 Commercial Law in a Global Context and enforce them, in the form of civil remedies such as damages, or state- sanctioned punishment for breach of the criminal law.
    [Show full text]
  • Padfield Wonders Aloud (Do Contact Me on [email protected])
    University of Leeds Centre for Criminal Justice Studies Justice in the Criminal Courts in the 21st Century What are criminal courts for? Nicky Padfield wonders aloud (do contact me on [email protected]) VERY VERY DRAFT Introduction I am taking the opportunity as the first speaker at this conference to raise some big and/or broad questions. The paper is not as developed as I would like: I shall dig more into history, theory, law and practice in due course. But, in essence, my argument is that this big picture allows us to remember important principles. Many of the speakers who follow will focus on individual aspects of the trial process, often presenting original empirical research. Here I go back to basics. What is a trial? A public process which compels defendants to answer a charge of criminal wrongdoing. The outcome is often a serious sanction. Obviously, trials have to be fair. That does not simply mean they should not be unfair. Should we focus on ways in which public courts can promote fairness and justice, and indeed social cohesion? Swift justice has merits, but does not necessarily achieve just outcomes. Non-public ‗diversion‘ is equally dangerous. I will briefly raise some of the criminological literature on compliance, legitimacy and desistance – but speak up also for human rights and the rule of law - a big agenda! History For the purpose of this paper, I took as my starting point a series of riot trials, at three different moments in English history. Serendipitously, when the riots of 2011 were still recent, I happened upon a book called the Report of the Trials for Rioting at Ely and Littleport, 1816 (Warren, ed, 1997).
    [Show full text]
  • Foi-17-02802
    Annex B Deputy First Minister’s briefing for James Wolffe meeting on 3 March 2016: Meeting with James Wolffe QC, Dean of Faculty of Advocates 14:30, 3 March 2016 Key message Support efforts to improve the societal contribution made by the courts. In particular the contribution to growing the economy Who James Wolffe QC, Dean of Faculty of Advocates What Informal meeting, principally to listen to the Dean’s views and suggestions Where Parliament When Date Thursday 3 March 2016 Time 14:30 pm Supporting Private Office indicated no officials required officials Briefing and No formal agenda agenda Annex A: Background on Faculty and biography of Mr Wolffe Annex B: Key lines Annex C: Background issues Copy to: Cabinet Secretary for Justice Minister for Community Safety and Legal Affairs DG Learning and Justice DG Enterprise, Environment and Innovation Neil Rennick, Director Justice Jan Marshall [REDACTED] Nicola Wisdahl Cameron Stewart [REDACTED] John McFarlane, Special Adviser Communications Safer & Stronger St Andrew’s House, Regent Road, Edinburgh EH1 3DG www.scotland.gov.uk MEETING WITH JAMES WOLFFE QC ANNEX A Background The Faculty of Advocates is an independent body of lawyers who have been admitted to practise as Advocates before the Courts of Scotland. The Faculty has been in existence since 1532 when the College of Justice was set up by Act of the Scots Parliament, but its origins are believed to predate that event. It is self- regulating, and the Court delegates to the Faculty the task of preparing Intrants for admission as Advocates. This task involves a process of examination and practical instruction known as devilling, during which Intrants benefit from intensive structured training in the special skills of advocacy.
    [Show full text]
  • Scotland and the UK Constitution
    Scotland and the UK Constitution The 1998 devolution acts brought about the most significant change in the constitution of the United Kingdom since at least the passage of the 1972 European Communities Act. Under those statutes devolved legislatures and administrations were created in Wales, Northern Ireland, and Scotland. The documents below have been selected to give an overview of the constitutional settlement established by the devolution acts and by the Courts. Scotland has been chosen as a case study for this examination, both because the Scottish Parliament has been granted the most extensive range of powers and legislative competences of the three devolved areas, but also because the ongoing debate on Scottish independence means that the powers and competencies of the Scottish Parliament are very much live questions. The devolution of certain legislative and political powers to Scotland was effected by the Scotland Act 1998. That statute, enacted by the Westminster Parliament, creates the Scottish Parliament and the Scottish Executive (now the “Scottish Government”), and establishes the limits on the Parliament’s legislative competence. Schedule 5 of the Act, interpolated by Section 30(1), lists those powers which are reserved to the Westminster Parliament, and delegates all other matters to the devolved organs. Thus, while constitutional matters, foreign affairs, and national defence are explicitly reserved to Westminster, all matters not listed— including the education system, the health service, the legal system, environmental
    [Show full text]
  • SOME OLD-TIME SCOTCH JUDGES. the Law Courts of Scotland Have
    SOME OLD-TIME SCOTCH JUDGES. The Law Courts of Scotland have been as famous for the person- alities of their Judges as for the quality of the law propounded and decreed therein, and few public institutions of ancient lineage have numbered among their members so many persons of marked character and individuality as the Court of Session in Edinburgh. In Scotland individual eccentricity has never been a barrier to merit and ability in the race for fame ; on the contrary, it has often been a powerful asset, and the records of her politics and public life teem with the personal eccentricities and outstanding peculiarities of her most distinguished citizens . The Court of Session, by which term the Law Courts of Scotland are described, has held since the date of the Union of the Crowns in 17'07 and still holds, a position of peculiar dignity. Mem- bers of Parliament and the higher Civil ;Servants have had by force of circumstances their residence in London,. and accordingly for two centuries the Law Courts have been left seised of the highest social position available in the world of Edinburgh, "mine own romantic town," as Sir Walter Scott loved to call it. As a result a Lord of Session has had a special prominence in . Scotland which none save a Peer of the Realm could dispute. They not only moulded the legal traditions of the country and by their de- cision affected the tone of its administration, but their influence upon its social life has been remarkable . In their roll are to be found some unworthy and commonplace names, but many of them are well worthy of resurrection from the vaults of local history to the day- light of the present generation.
    [Show full text]
  • British Institute of International and Comparative Law
    BRITISH INSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL AND COMPARATIVE LAW PROJECT REFERENCE: JLS/2006/FPC/21 – 30-CE-00914760055 THE EFFECT IN THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY OF JUDGMENTS IN CIVIL AND COMMERCIAL MATTERS: RECOGNITION, RES JUDICATA AND ABUSE OF PROCESS Project Advisory Board: The Rt Hon Sir Francis Jacobs KCMG QC (chair); Lord Mance; Mr David Anderson QC; Dr Peter Barnett; Mr Peter Beaton; Professor Adrian Briggs; Professor Burkhard Hess; Mr Adam Johnson; Mr Alex Layton QC; Professor Paul Oberhammer; Professor Rolf Stürner; Ms Mona Vaswani; Professor Rhonda Wasserman Project National Rapporteurs: Mr Peter Beaton (Scotland); Professor Alegría Borrás (Spain); Mr Andrew Dickinson (England and Wales); Mr Javier Areste Gonzalez (Spain – Assistant Rapporteur); Mr Christian Heinze (Germany); Professor Lars Heuman (Sweden); Mr Urs Hoffmann-Nowotny (Switzerland – Assistant Rapporteur); Professor Emmanuel Jeuland (France); Professor Paul Oberhammer (Switzerland); Mr Jonas Olsson (Sweden – Assistant Rapporteur); Mr Mikael Pauli (Sweden – Assistant Rapporteur); Dr Norel Rosner (Romania); Ms Justine Stefanelli (United States); Mr Jacob van de Velden (Netherlands) Project Director: Jacob van de Velden Project Research Fellow: Justine Stefanelli Project Consultant: Andrew Dickinson Project Research Assistants: Elina Konstantinidou and Daniel Vasbeck 1 QUESTIONNAIRE The Effect in the European Community of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters: Recognition, Res Judicata and Abuse of Process Instructions to National Rapporteurs Please use the following questions to describe the current position in the country for which you have been appointed as National Rapporteur. Please respond to the following questions as fully as possible, with appropriate reference to, and quotation of, supporting authority (e.g. case law and, where appropriate, the views of legal writers).
    [Show full text]
  • Solicitors in the Supreme Courts of Scotland (Amendment) Bill Committee
    Published 15 January 2020 SP Paper 657 1st Report, 2020 (Session 5) Solicitors in the Supreme Courts of Scotland (Amendment) Bill Committee Solicitors in the Supreme Courts of Scotland (Amendment) Bill Committee - Preliminary Stage Report Published in Scotland by the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body. All documents are available on the Scottish For information on the Scottish Parliament contact Parliament website at: Public Information on: http://www.parliament.scot/abouttheparliament/ Telephone: 0131 348 5000 91279.aspx Textphone: 0800 092 7100 Email: [email protected] © Parliamentary copyright. Scottish Parliament Corporate Body The Scottish Parliament's copyright policy can be found on the website — www.parliament.scot Solicitors in the Supreme Courts of Scotland (Amendment) Bill Committee Solicitors in the Supreme Courts of Scotland (Amendment) Bill Committee - Preliminary Stage Report, 1st Report, 2020 (Session 5) Contents Introduction ____________________________________________________________1 Objectives of the Bill _____________________________________________________2 Background to the Bill ___________________________________________________3 History _______________________________________________________________3 Current situation________________________________________________________3 The need for change ____________________________________________________4 Parliamentary Procedure _________________________________________________6 Private Bill Procedure ___________________________________________________6 Role of
    [Show full text]
  • The Arabian Peninsula in Modern Times: a Historiographical Survey of Recent Publications J.E
    Journal of Arabian Studies 4.2 (December 2014) pp. 244–74 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21534764.2014.979080 The Arabian Peninsula in Modern Times: A Historiographical Survey of Recent Publications J.E. PETERSON Abstract: Writing on the history of the Arabian Peninsula has grown considerably in recent years and this survey — an updating of an earlier examination — cites and describes the publications in Western languages since 1990 that deal with the Peninsula’s history, historiography, and related subjects. It loosely categorizes the literature according to subject and assesses the state of the art during this time period. It also includes some personal observations of the author on the progress and direction of writing on the Arabian Peninsula. Keywords: Arabian Peninsula, Gulf, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Qatar, United Arab Emirates, Oman, Yemen, history, historiography, country studies, biography, boundaries, military, economic history, social history, cultural history, diplomatic history, foreign policy, Britain, USA, Islam, Wahhabism, Islamic sects, Indian Ocean studies, Hadramawt, Jews in Yemen 1 Introduction In an article published in 1991, I wrote that “The outlines of Arabia’s modern history are well known. It is the underlying firmament that remains terra incognita.”1 To be sure, much of the ter- ritory still remains unknown or unexplored, but, on the positive side, significant inroads have been made over the two decades since then. This survey is an update of that earlier article. The review of recent literature not only reflects an augmentation of publications but a (seemingly paradoxical) broadening and narrowing of focus. I remarked in the earlier essay that much of the literature was descriptive or narrative.
    [Show full text]
  • Scottish Courts and the Law
    ALT_1 Scottish courts and the law Scottish courts and the law Copyright © 2017 The Open University Contents Introduction and guidance 4 Introduction and guidance 4 What is a badged course? 5 How to get a badge 6 Acknowledgements 7 Week 1: Why do courts exist and what do they do? 8 Introduction 8 1 What are courts? 8 2 Why have courts? 11 2.1 Courts in Scotland 12 3 Courts and the state in Scotland 13 3.1 The rule of law 13 3.2 The jurisdiction of the courts 14 4 This week’s quiz 16 Summary 17 Week 2: Bringing a case to court 18 Introduction 18 1 Categories of unlawful conduct 18 1.1 Classification of unlawful conduct 20 2 Thinking about bringing a case 22 2.1 Factors to consider when building a case 24 3 This week’s quiz 26 Summary 27 Week 3: The court structure in Scotland 28 Introduction 28 1 Categories of unlawful conduct 28 1.1 Classification of unlawful conduct 30 2 Thinking about bringing a case 32 2.1 Factors to consider when building a case 34 3 This week’s quiz 36 Summary 37 Week 4: Court proceedings in Scotland 38 Introduction 38 1 The role and function of courts 38 2 Civil court procedure 41 3 Criminal court procedure 44 4 This week’s quiz 46 Summary 47 Week 5: Who does what in the courtroom 48 Introduction 48 1 Seeking advice before going to court 48 1.1 The civil court room 49 1.2 The criminal court room 49 1.3 Reflections on the courtroom 50 1.3.1 The role of an Inner House Judge 51 1.3.2 The role of an Outer House judge 52 1.3.3 The role of a Sheriff Principal 52 1.3.4 The role of a Sheriff 54 1.3.5 The role of a Justice
    [Show full text]
  • Judicial Salaries
    MINISTRY0B OF JUSTICE JUDICIAL1B SALARIES FROM 1 APRIL 2013 Group Salaries w.e.f. Salaries w.e.f. Salaries w.e.f. 01/04/11 01/04/12 01/04/13 Group 1 239,845 239,845 242,243 Lord Chief Justice Group 1.1 214,165 214,165 216,307 Lord Chief Justice of Northern Ireland Lord President of the Court of Session Master of the Rolls President of the Supreme Court Group 2 206,857 206,857 208,926 Chancellor of the High Court Deputy President of the Supreme Court Justices of the Supreme Court Lord Justice Clerk President of the Family Division President of the Queen’s Bench Division Senior President of Tribunals (Transitional pay) (201,613) (203,643) (207,730) Group3B 3 196,707 196,707 198,674 Inner House Judges of the Court of Session Lords Justices of Appeal Lords Justices of Appeal (N I) Group4B 4 172,753 172,753 174,481 High Court Judges [Note A] Outer House Judges of the Court of Session Puisne Judges (N I) Vice-Chancellor of the County Palatine of Lancaster Former Chief Asylum Support Adjudicator, Asylum 146,668 146,668 148,135 Support Tribunal (now judge of the First-tier Tribunal, Social Entitlement Chamber, and Deputy Judge of the Upper Tribunal) Group 5 138,548 138,548 139,933 Chairman, Scottish Land Court President of the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and Deputy Judge of the Upper Tribunal [Note L] Chief Social Security Commissioner (N I) 1 Group Salaries w.e.f. Salaries w.e.f. Salaries w.e.f.
    [Show full text]
  • Review Body on Senior Salaries Cm 8026
    Review Body on Senior Salaries Review Body on Senior Salaries – REPORT No. 77 2011 REPORT No. 77 Thirty-Third Report on Senior Salaries 2011 Published by TSO (The Stationery Office) and available from: Online www.tsoshop.co.uk Mail, telephone, fax and email TSO PO Box 29, Norwich NR3 1GN Telephone orders/general enquiries: 0870 600 5522 Chairman: Bill Cockburn, CBE TD Order through the Parliamentary Hotline Lo-Call 0845 7 023474 Fax orders: 0870 600 5533 Email: [email protected] Textphone: 0870 240 3701 The Parliamentary Bookshop 12 Bridge Street, Parliament Square, London SW1A 2JX Telephone orders/general enquiries: 020 7219 3890 Fax orders: 020 7219 3866 Email: [email protected] Internet: http://www.bookshop.parliament.uk TSO@Blackwell and other accredited agents Cm 8026 £20.50 Customers can also order publications from: .. TSO Ireland 16 Arthur Street, Belfast BT1 4GD Telephone orders/general enquiries: 028 9023 8451 Fax orders: 028 9023 5401 RBSS_2011_cover.indd 1 10/03/2011 23:35 Review Body on Senior Salaries REPORT No. 77 Thirty-Third Report on Senior Salaries 2011 Chairman: Bill Cockburn, CBE TD Presented to Parliament by the Prime Minister by Command of Her Majesty March 2011 Cm 8026 £20.50 RBSS_2011.indd 1 10/03/2011 23:35 © Crown copyright 2011 You may re-use this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government­ licence/ or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or e-mail: [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Committee on the Emoluments of Certain Public Servants First
    PP66/08 J o in t C o m m it t ee on th e E m o lu m en t s of C er t a in P u blic Ser v a n t s F ir st R epo r t fo r th e Se ssio n 2007-2008 FIRST REPORT OF THE JOINT COMMITTEE ON THE EMOLUMENTS OF CERTAIN PUBLIC SERVANTS 2007/2008 Constituted 2nd and 30th March 1965 as a Standing Joint Committee to examine the amount of expenses paid to Members and the salaries of Senior Government Officials and Crown Officers. The Keys representatives are the members of the Consultative Committee of the House. By its First Report 1992/ 93 the terms of reference were revised as follows - (i) to consider and report to the Council and Keys on - (a) the emoluments of H E Lieutenant Governor, their Honours the First and Second Deemsters and the Judge of Appeal, H M Attorney General, the High Bailiff, the Deputy High Bailiff and the Clerk of Tynwald; (b) the Tynwald Membership Pension Scheme; and (c) in addition to its consultative functions set out in paragraph (i) and as it thinks fit, the emoluments of Members of Tynwald; (ii) to carry out its consultative functions under section 6(3) of the Payments of Members’ Expenses Act 1989, as the body designated by the Payment Of Members’ Expenses (Designation of Consultative Body) Order 1989. The powers, privileges and immunities relating to the work of a committee of Tynwald are those conferred by sections 3 and 4 of the Tynwald Proceedings Act 1876, sections 1 to 4 of the Privileges of Tynwald (Publications) Act 1973 and sections 2 to 4 of the Tynwald Proceedings Act 1984.
    [Show full text]