DOCSLIB.ORG

The Universe in a Helium Droplet: from Semi-Metals & Topological Insulators to Particle Physics & Cosmology G

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Universe in a Helium Droplet: from Semi-Metals & Topological Insulators to Particle Physics & Cosmology G The Universe in a helium droplet: from semi-metals & topological insulators to particle physics & cosmology G. Volovik Zelenogorsk, July 12, 2010 Landau Institute 1. Introduction: helium liquids & Universe * effective quantum field theories * quantum vacuum as topological medium * thermodynamics of quantum vacuum & cosmological constant 2. Fermi surface as topological object 3. Dirac (Fermi) points as topological objects * semimetals, cuprate superconductors, graphene, superfluid 3He-A, vacuum of Standard Model of particle physics in massless phase * topological invariants for gapless 2D and 3D topological matter * emergent physical laws near Dirac point (Fermi point) 4. Fully gapped topological media * superfluid 3He-B, topological insulators, chiral superconductors, vacuum of Standard Model of particle physics in present massive phase * topological invariants for gapped 2D and 3D topological matter * edge states, fermion zero modes on vortices & Majorana fermions * intrinsic QHE & spin-QHE, Chern-Simons action, chiral anomaly, vortex dynamics, ... 5. Thermodynamics & dynamics of quantum vacuum * vacuum energy & cosmological constant * cosmology as relaxation to equilibrium Torsion & spinning strings, torsion instanton Emergence & effective theories Fermion zero modes on strings & walls Vacuum polarization, screening - antiscreening, running coupling Antigravitating (negative-mass) string Symmetry breaking (anisotropy of vacuum) Gravitational Aharonov-Bohm effect Parity violation -- chiral fermions Domain wall terminating on string Vacuum instability in strong fields, pair production unity of physics String terminating on domain wall Casimir force, quantum friction Monopoles on string & Boojums Fermionic charge of vacuum Witten superconducting string Higgs fields & gauge bosons 3He Grand Unification Soft core string, Q-balls Momentum-space topology Kibble mechanism Z &W strings Hierarchy problem, Supersymmetry Dark matter detector skyrmions Neutrino oscillations cosmic physical Gap nodes Primordial magnetic field Alice string Chiral anomaly & axions vacuum Low -T scaling Baryogenesis by textures Pion string strings Spin & isospin, String theory mixed state Cosmological & & strings CPT-violation, GUT Broken time reversal Newton constants Inflation high-T & chiral High Energy 1/2-vortex, vortex dynamics dark energy Branes cosmology super- Films: FQHE, dark matter matter Physics conductivity Statistics & charge of Effective gravity creation skyrmions & vortices Bi-metric & low vacuum Edge states; spintronics conformal gravity Condensed gravity Gravity 3 dimensional 1D fermions in vortex core Graviton, dilaton He Matter systems Critical fluctuations Spin connection Mixture of condensates Rotating vacuum black Bose Vacuum dynamics Plasma Phenome Vector & spinor condensates holes QCD condensates BEC of quasipartcles, conformal anomaly Physics nology ergoregion, event horizon neutron magnon BEC & laser Hawking & Unruh effects hydrodynamics meron, skyrmion, 1/2 vortex black hole entropy stars quark nuclear phase General; relativistic; spin superfluidity Vacuum instability matter physics transitions disorder Superfluidity of neutron star random multi-fluid Quark condensate Nuclei vs vortices, glitches quantum phase transitions anisotropy rotating superfluid Nambu--Jona-Lasinio 3He droplet shear flow instability & momentum-space topology Larkin- Imry-Ma Shear flow instability Vaks--Larkin Shell model Relativistic plasma topological insulator Magnetohydrodynamic Color superfluidity Pair-correlations Photon mass classes of random Turbulence of vortex lines Savvidi vacuum Collective modes Vortex Coulomb matrices propagating vortex front Quark confinement, QCD cosmology plasma velocity independent Intrinsic orbital momentum of quark matter Reynolds number Helium liquids & the Universe From Landau Fermi liquid & two-fluid hydrodynamics to physics of quantum vacuum & cosmology * superfluid 4He and Universe Landau two-fluid hydrodynamics Einstein general relativity * liquid 3He and Universe Landau theory of Fermi liquid as effective theory of fermionic vacuum * extension of Landau theory from Fermi surface to Fermi point superfluid 3He-A Standard Model + gravity * from Fermi point to QHE & topological insulators planar phase & 3He-B Dirac vacuum as topological insulator * from helium liquids to dynamics of quantum vacuum & cosmology quantum vacuum as self-sustained system cosmology as approach to equilibrium 3+1 sources of effective Quantum Field Theories Lev Landau I think it is safe to say that no one understands Quantum Mechanics Richard Feynman Thermodynamics is the only physical theory of universal content Albert Einstein effective theories Symmetry: conservation laws, translational invariance, of quantum liquids: spontaneously broken symmetry, Grand Unification, ... two-fluid hydrodynamics of superfluid 4He & Fermi liquid theory of liquid 3He missing ingredient Topology: you can't comb the hair on a ball smooth, in Landau theories anti-Grand-Unification Landau view on a many body system many body systems are simple at low energy & temperature equally applied to: weakly excited state of liquid superfluids, can be considered as system solids, of "elementary excitations" & relativistic quantum vacuum Landau, 1941 Universe helium liquids ground state = vacuum vacuum ground state + + elementary elementary particles excitations quasiparticles = elementary particles why is low energy physics applicable to our vacuum ? 1. superfluid 4He & effective theories of hydrodynamic type Landau two-fluid hydrodynamics Einstein general relativity classical low-energy property classical low-energy property of quantum liquids of quantum vacuum Landau equations Einstein equations Landau equations & Einstein equations are effective theories describing dynamics of metric field + matter (quasiparticles) Landau quasiparticles in superfluid 4He: phonons & rotons two types of rotons in Landau theory in original 1941 theory: quantum of vortex motion in modified 1946 theory: short wavelength quasiparticle Landau 1941 roton: Landau gap in vortex spectrum quasiparticles of vortex spectrum ∆ ∼ h2ρ2/3m−5/3 this is energy this is vortex ring of vortex ring of minimal size of minimal size phonon long wave Landau estimate excitation Landau 1946 roton of vortex gap is correct ! short wave quasiparticle N.G. Berloff & P.H. Roberts Nonlocal condensate models of superfluid helium J. Phys. A32, 5611 (1999) Effective metric in Landau two-fluid hydrodynamics Doppler shifted phonon spectrum in moving superfluid review: Barcelo, Liberati & Visser, E = cp + p.vs c speed of sound Analogue Gravity Living Rev. Rel. 8 (2005) 12 vs superfluid velocity move p.vs to the left E − p.vs= cp take square 2 2 2 µυ p =(−E, p) (E − p.vs) − c p = 0 g pµpν = 0 ν 00 0 i i ij 2 ij i j g = −1 g = −vs g = c δ −vs vs effective metric inverse metric gµυ determines effective spacetime in which phonons move along geodesic curves 2 2 2 2 2 µ ν ds = − c dt + (dr − vsdt) ds = gµυdx dx reference frame for phonon is dragged by moving liquid Landau critical velocity = black hole horizon Painleve-Gulstrand metric superfluid 4He Gravity 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 ds = - dt (c -v ) + 2 v dr dt + dr + r dΩ g 00 g0r acoustic horizon black hole horizon Schwarzschild metric 2 2 r 2 2____GM 2 __rh v (r) = c __h ds2 = - dt2 (c2-v2) + dr2 /(c2-v2) + r2dΩ2 v (r) = = c r r r gravity v(r) vs(r) g00 grr horizon at g00= 0 vs= c where flow velocity black hole r = rh (velocity of local frame in GR) v(r )=c reaches Landau critical velocity h superfluid v(rh) = vLandau = c vacuum (Unruh, 1981) Hawking radiation is phonon/photon creation above Landau critical velocity Superfluids Universe acoustic gravity metric theories of gravity general relativity geometry of effective space time g geometry of space time for quasiparticles (phonons) µυ for matter 2 µ ν geodesics for photons geodesics for phonons ds = gµυdx dx = 0 Landau two-fluid equations Einstein equations of GR . Matter dynamic equations ρ + .(ρvs + P ) = 0 Matter for metric field gµυ 1 (Rµν - gµνR/2) = Tµν . 2 vs + (µ + vs /2) = 0 8πG equations equation equation for superfluid for normal µν T;ν Matter = 0 for matter 1/2 of GR component component message from: liquid helium to: gravity is gravity fundamental ? it may emerge as classical output of underlying quantum system as hydrodynamics ? underlying microscopic superfluid helium quantum system at high energy quantum vacuum classical 2-fluid emergent classical general hydrodynamics low-energy relativity effective theory . Matter ρ + .(ρvs + P ) = 0 1 Matter . 2 (Rµν - gµνR/2) - Λgµν = Tµν vs + (µ + vs /2) = 0 8πG Tµν = 0 ν Matter application of Landau view on a many body system to Universe many body systems are simple at low energy & temperature weakly excited state of liquid weakly excited state of Universe can be considered as system should be also simple of "elementary excitations" Landau, 1941 helium liquids Universe ground state vacuum + + elementary elementary excitations particles but why is low energy physics applicable to our Universe ? characteristic high-energy scale in our vacuum is Planck energy 5 1/2 19 32 EP =(hc /G) ~10 GeV~10 K high-energy physics is high-energy physics & cosmology extremely ultra-low energy physics belong to ultra-low temperature physics highest energy in accelerators T of cosmic background radiation 16 Eew ~1 TeV ~ 10 K TCMBR ~ 1 K −16 E ~ 10 E −32 ew Planck TCMBR ~ 10 EPlanck cosmology is extremely ultra-low frequency physics cosmological expansion v(r,t) = H(t) r Hubble law −60 H ~ 10 EPlanck
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Symmetry and Gravity
    universe Article Making a Quantum Universe: Symmetry and Gravity Houri Ziaeepour 1,2 1 Institut UTINAM, CNRS UMR 6213, Observatoire de Besançon, Université de Franche Compté, 41 bis ave. de l’Observatoire, BP 1615, 25010 Besançon, France; [email protected] or [email protected] 2 Mullard Space Science Laboratory, University College London, Holmbury St. Mary, Dorking GU5 6NT, UK Received: 05 September 2020; Accepted: 17 October 2020; Published: 23 October 2020 Abstract: So far, none of attempts to quantize gravity has led to a satisfactory model that not only describe gravity in the realm of a quantum world, but also its relation to elementary particles and other fundamental forces. Here, we outline the preliminary results for a model of quantum universe, in which gravity is fundamentally and by construction quantic. The model is based on three well motivated assumptions with compelling observational and theoretical evidence: quantum mechanics is valid at all scales; quantum systems are described by their symmetries; universe has infinite independent degrees of freedom. The last assumption means that the Hilbert space of the Universe has SUpN Ñ 8q – area preserving Diff.pS2q symmetry, which is parameterized by two angular variables. We show that, in the absence of a background spacetime, this Universe is trivial and static. Nonetheless, quantum fluctuations break the symmetry and divide the Universe to subsystems. When a subsystem is singled out as reference—observer—and another as clock, two more continuous parameters arise, which can be interpreted as distance and time. We identify the classical spacetime with parameter space of the Hilbert space of the Universe.
    [Show full text]
  • Consequences of Kaluza-Klein Covariance
    CONSEQUENCES OF KALUZA-KLEIN COVARIANCE Paul S. Wesson Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1, Canada Space-Time-Matter Consortium, http://astro.uwaterloo.ca/~wesson PACs: 11.10Kk, 11.25Mj, 0.45-h, 04.20Cv, 98.80Es Key Words: Classical Mechanics, Quantum Mechanics, Gravity, Relativity, Higher Di- mensions Addresses: Mail to Waterloo above; email: [email protected] Abstract The group of coordinate transformations for 5D noncompact Kaluza-Klein theory is broader than the 4D group for Einstein’s general relativity. Therefore, a 4D quantity can take on different forms depending on the choice for the 5D coordinates. We illustrate this by deriving the physical consequences for several forms of the canonical metric, where the fifth coordinate is altered by a translation, an inversion and a change from spacelike to timelike. These cause, respectively, the 4D cosmological ‘constant’ to be- come dependent on the fifth coordinate, the rest mass of a test particle to become measured by its Compton wavelength, and the dynamics to become wave-mechanical with a small mass quantum. These consequences of 5D covariance – whether viewed as positive or negative – help to determine the viability of current attempts to unify gravity with the interactions of particles. 1. Introduction Covariance, or the ability to change coordinates while not affecting the validity of the equations, is an essential property of any modern field theory. It is one of the found- ing principles for Einstein’s theory of gravitation, general relativity. However, that theory is four-dimensional, whereas many theories which seek to unify gravitation with the interactions of particles use higher-dimensional spaces.
    [Show full text]
  • Conformal Symmetry in Field Theory and in Quantum Gravity
    universe Review Conformal Symmetry in Field Theory and in Quantum Gravity Lesław Rachwał Instituto de Física, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília DF 70910-900, Brazil; [email protected] Received: 29 August 2018; Accepted: 9 November 2018; Published: 15 November 2018 Abstract: Conformal symmetry always played an important role in field theory (both quantum and classical) and in gravity. We present construction of quantum conformal gravity and discuss its features regarding scattering amplitudes and quantum effective action. First, the long and complicated story of UV-divergences is recalled. With the development of UV-finite higher derivative (or non-local) gravitational theory, all problems with infinities and spacetime singularities might be completely solved. Moreover, the non-local quantum conformal theory reveals itself to be ghost-free, so the unitarity of the theory should be safe. After the construction of UV-finite theory, we focused on making it manifestly conformally invariant using the dilaton trick. We also argue that in this class of theories conformal anomaly can be taken to vanish by fine-tuning the couplings. As applications of this theory, the constraints of the conformal symmetry on the form of the effective action and on the scattering amplitudes are shown. We also remark about the preservation of the unitarity bound for scattering. Finally, the old model of conformal supergravity by Fradkin and Tseytlin is briefly presented. Keywords: quantum gravity; conformal gravity; quantum field theory; non-local gravity; super- renormalizable gravity; UV-finite gravity; conformal anomaly; scattering amplitudes; conformal symmetry; conformal supergravity 1. Introduction From the beginning of research on theories enjoying invariance under local spacetime-dependent transformations, conformal symmetry played a pivotal role—first introduced by Weyl related changes of meters to measure distances (and also due to relativity changes of periods of clocks to measure time intervals).
    [Show full text]
  • Naturalness and New Approaches to the Hierarchy Problem
    Naturalness and New Approaches to the Hierarchy Problem PiTP 2017 Nathaniel Craig Department of Physics, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 No warranty expressed or implied. This will eventually grow into a more polished public document, so please don't disseminate beyond the PiTP community, but please do enjoy. Suggestions, clarifications, and comments are welcome. Contents 1 Introduction 2 1.0.1 The proton mass . .3 1.0.2 Flavor hierarchies . .4 2 The Electroweak Hierarchy Problem 5 2.1 A toy model . .8 2.2 The naturalness strategy . 13 3 Old Hierarchy Solutions 16 3.1 Lowered cutoff . 16 3.2 Symmetries . 17 3.2.1 Supersymmetry . 17 3.2.2 Global symmetry . 22 3.3 Vacuum selection . 26 4 New Hierarchy Solutions 28 4.1 Twin Higgs / Neutral naturalness . 28 4.2 Relaxion . 31 4.2.1 QCD/QCD0 Relaxion . 31 4.2.2 Interactive Relaxion . 37 4.3 NNaturalness . 39 5 Rampant Speculation 42 5.1 UV/IR mixing . 42 6 Conclusion 45 1 1 Introduction What are the natural sizes of parameters in a quantum field theory? The original notion is the result of an aggregation of different ideas, starting with Dirac's Large Numbers Hypothesis (\Any two of the very large dimensionless numbers occurring in Nature are connected by a simple mathematical relation, in which the coefficients are of the order of magnitude unity" [1]), which was not quantum in nature, to Gell- Mann's Totalitarian Principle (\Anything that is not compulsory is forbidden." [2]), to refinements by Wilson and 't Hooft in more modern language.
    [Show full text]
  • UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Discoverable Matter: an Optimist’s View of Dark Matter and How to Find It Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2sv8b4x5 Author Mcgehee Jr., Robert Stephen Publication Date 2020 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Discoverable Matter: an Optimist’s View of Dark Matter and How to Find It by Robert Stephen Mcgehee Jr. A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Physics in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Hitoshi Murayama, Chair Professor Alexander Givental Professor Yasunori Nomura Summer 2020 Discoverable Matter: an Optimist’s View of Dark Matter and How to Find It Copyright 2020 by Robert Stephen Mcgehee Jr. 1 Abstract Discoverable Matter: an Optimist’s View of Dark Matter and How to Find It by Robert Stephen Mcgehee Jr. Doctor of Philosophy in Physics University of California, Berkeley Professor Hitoshi Murayama, Chair An abundance of evidence from diverse cosmological times and scales demonstrates that 85% of the matter in the Universe is comprised of nonluminous, non-baryonic dark matter. Discovering its fundamental nature has become one of the greatest outstanding problems in modern science. Other persistent problems in physics have lingered for decades, among them the electroweak hierarchy and origin of the baryon asymmetry. Little is known about the solutions to these problems except that they must lie beyond the Standard Model. The first half of this dissertation explores dark matter models motivated by their solution to not only the dark matter conundrum but other issues such as electroweak naturalness and baryon asymmetry.
    [Show full text]
  • Weyl Gauge-Vector and Complex Dilaton Scalar for Conformal Symmetry and Its Breaking
    1 Weyl gauge-vector and complex dilaton scalar for conformal symmetry and its breaking Hans C. Ohanian1 Abstract Instead of the scalar “dilaton” field that is usually adopted to construct conformally invariant Lagrangians for gravitation, we here propose a hybrid construction, involving both a complex dilaton scalar and a Weyl gauge- vector, in accord with Weyl’s original concept of a non-Riemannian conformal geometry with a transport law for length and time intervals, for which this gauge vector is required. Such a hybrid construction permits us to avoid the wrong sign of the dilaton kinetic term (the ghost problem) that afflicts the usual construction. The introduction of a Weyl gauge-vector and its interaction with the dilaton also has the collateral benefit of providing an explicit mechanism for spontaneous breaking of the conformal symmetry, whereby the dilaton and the Weyl gauge-vector acquire masses somewhat smaller than mP by the Coleman-Weinberg mechanism. Conformal symmetry breaking is assumed to precede inflation, which occurs later by a separate GUT or electroweak symmetry breaking, as in inflationary models based on the Higgs boson. Keywords Quantum gravity • Conformal invariance • Spontaneous symmetry breaking •Weyl length transport Publication history First arXiv publication [v1] 30 January 2015. The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10714-016-2023-8 and in General Relativity and Gravitation, March 2016, 48:25. 1 Introduction Modifications of Einstein’s gravitational theory that incorporate local conformal symmetry—that is, invariance 2 (x ) under the transformation g( x ) e g ( x ) , where ()x is an arbitrary real function—have been exploited in attempts at the solution of various of theoretical problems, such as renormalization of the stress tensor, renormalization of quantum gravity, quantum mechanics of black holes, analytic solutions and geodesic completeness in the early universe, and the dynamics that lead to inflation by symmetry breaking.
    [Show full text]
  • Conformally Invariant Equations for Graviton 50 5.1 the Conformally Invariant System of Conformal Degree 1
    Conformally Invariant Equations for Graviton Mohsen Fathi Department of Physics, Tehran Central Branch Islamic Azad Univeristy arXiv:1210.3436v3 [physics.gen-ph] 12 Nov 2012 A thesis submitted for the Master degree Master of Science in Physics Tehran, Winter 2010 I am grateful to my supervisor Dr. Mohammad Reza Tanhayi for the helps, supports and scientific training, during this work and thereafter. Abstract Recent astrophysical data indicate that our universe might currently be in a de Sitter (dS) phase. The importance of dS space has been primarily ignited by the study of the inflationary model of the universe and the quantum gravity. As we know Einstein’s theory of gravitation (with a nonzero cosmological constant) can be interpreted as a theory of a metric field; that is, a symmetric tensor field of rank-2 on a fixed de Sitter back- ground. It has been shown the massless spin-2 Fierz-Pauli wave equation (or the linearized Einstein equation) is not conformally invariant. This result is in contrary with what we used to expect for massless theories. In this thesis we obtain conformally invariant wave equation for the massless spin-2 in the dS space. This study is motivated by the belief that confor- mal invariance may be the key to a future theory of quantum gravity. Contents Introduction 1 1 The Lorentz and the conformal groups, and the concept of invari- ance 3 1.1 Grouptheory ............................... 3 1.1.1 Orthogonalgroups ........................ 4 1.1.2 Rotationgroups.......................... 5 1.2 Invarianceunderagroupaction . 7 1.2.1 Invarianceofthelawsofphysics. 7 1.3 TheLorentzgroup ............................ 8 1.4 Theconformalgroup ..........................
    [Show full text]
  • Solving the Hierarchy Problem
    solving the hierarchy problem Joseph Lykken Fermilab/U. Chicago puzzle of the day: why is gravity so weak? answer: because there are large or warped extra dimensions about to be discovered at colliders puzzle of the day: why is gravity so weak? real answer: don’t know many possibilities may not even be a well-posed question outline of this lecture • what is the hierarchy problem of the Standard Model • is it really a problem? • what are the ways to solve it? • how is this related to gravity? what is the hierarchy problem of the Standard Model? • discuss concepts of naturalness and UV sensitivity in field theory • discuss Higgs naturalness problem in SM • discuss extra assumptions that lead to the hierarchy problem of SM UV sensitivity • Ken Wilson taught us how to think about field theory: “UV completion” = high energy effective field theory matching scale, Λ low energy effective field theory, e.g. SM energy UV sensitivity • how much do physical parameters of the low energy theory depend on details of the UV matching (i.e. short distance physics)? • if you know both the low and high energy theories, can answer this question precisely • if you don’t know the high energy theory, use a crude estimate: how much do the low energy observables change if, e.g. you let Λ → 2 Λ ? degrees of UV sensitivity parameter UV sensitivity “finite” quantities none -- UV insensitive dimensionless couplings logarithmic -- UV insensitive e.g. gauge or Yukawa couplings dimension-full coefs of higher dimension inverse power of cutoff -- “irrelevant” operators e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Conformal Gravity Holography in Four Dimensions
    Loyola University Chicago Loyola eCommons Physics: Faculty Publications and Other Works Faculty Publications 2014 Conformal Gravity Holography in Four Dimensions Daniel Grumiller Maria Irakleidou Iva Lovrekovic, Robert McNees Loyola University Chicago, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.luc.edu/physics_facpubs Part of the Physics Commons Recommended Citation Grumiller, D, M Irakleidou, I Lovrekovic, and R McNees. "Conformal Gravity Holography in Four Dimensions." Physical Review Letters 112, 2014. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Publications at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Physics: Faculty Publications and Other Works by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. © 2014 American Physical Society. week ending PRL 112, 111102 (2014) PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 21 MARCH 2014 Conformal Gravity Holography in Four Dimensions † ‡ Daniel Grumiller,1,* Maria Irakleidou,1, Iva Lovrekovic,1, and Robert McNees2,§ 1Institute for Theoretical Physics, Vienna University of Technology, Wiedner Hauptstrasse 8–10/136, A-1040 Vienna, Austria 2Department of Physics, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60660, USA (Received 8 October 2013; published 18 March 2014) We formulate four-dimensional conformal gravity with (anti–)de Sitter boundary conditions that are weaker than Starobinsky boundary conditions, allowing for an asymptotically subleading Rindler term concurrent with a recent model for gravity at large distances. We prove the consistency of the variational principle and derive the holographic response functions. One of them is the conformal gravity version of the Brown–York stress tensor, the other is a “partially massless response”.
    [Show full text]
  • Rotating Black Holes in Conformal Gravity
    European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences 2014; www.european-science.com Vol.3, No.4 pp. 892-896 ISSN 1805-3602 Rotating black holes in conformal gravity Sara Dastan1*, Ali Farokhtabar1, Mohammad Ali Ganjali1,2, Bahare Hosseini1 1Department of Science, Faculty of Physics, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran 2Institute for Research in Fundamental Sciences(IPM), P.O. Box 19395-5531, Tehran, Iran *E-mail: [email protected] Received for publication: 02 June 2014. Accepted for publication: 30 September 2014. Abstract It is a long time since the motion of astronomical objects has been explained in the framework of Newtonian gravity. The great success of Newton’s law of universal gravitation in planetary motion persuaded astronomers to use this regime as a viable framework in the larger scales. Meanwhile, whenever a deviation of observed motions from expected ones were observed, the immediate question came up: should such anomalies be considered as incompleteness of laws of gravitation or as indication of the existence of unseen objects? In following we explain rotating black holes and solving this metric’s black hole with conformal gravity. Firstly explaining problem with DM then introducing conformal transformation and conformal gravity, in the last step we solve a metric for rotating black hole in the presence and absence of matter. Keywords: Rotation, Gravity, Black Holes, Conformal Gravity Introduction During the last century Einstein gravity (EG) was one the corner of theoretical physics. Despite of the success in explanation of various gravitational phenomena in nature, there are some unsolved basic problems such as singularity problem, black hole physics,… and most importantly quantum theory of gravity.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is Not the Hierarchy Problem (Of the SM Higgs)
    What is not the hierarchy problem (of the SM Higgs) Matěj Hudec Výjezdní seminář ÚČJF Malá Skála, 12 Apr 2019, lunchtime Our ecological footprint he FuFnu wni twhit th the ggs AbAebliealina nH iHiggs mmodoedlel ký MM. M. Maalinlinsský 5 (2013) EEPPJJCC 7 733, ,2 244115 (2013) 660 aarrXXiivv::11221122..44660 12 pgs. 2 Our ecological footprint the Aspects of FuFnu wni twhith the Aspects of ggs renormalization AbAebliealina nH iHiggs renormalization of spontaneously mmodoedlel of spontaneously broken gauge broken gauge theories theories ký MM. M. Maalinlinsský MASTER THESIS MASTER THESIS M. H. M. H. 5 (2013) supervised by M.M. EEPPJJCC 7 733, ,2 244115 (2013) supervised by M.M. iv:1212.4660 2016 aarrXXiv:1212.4660 2016 12 pgs. 56 pgs. 3 Our ecological footprint Aspects of Fun with the H Fun with the Aspects of ierarchy and n Higgs renormalization AbAebliealian Higgs renormalization dHecoup of spontaneously ierarclhing mmodoedlel of spontaneously y and broken gauge decoup broken gauge ling theories theories M. Hudec, M. Malinský M M. Malinský MASTER THESIS .M M. alinský MASTER THESIS Hudec, M. M M. H. alinský M. H. (hopeful 5 (2013) supervised by M.M. ly EPJC) EEPPJJCC 7 733, ,2 244115 (2013) supervised by M.M. arX (hopef iv:190u2lly. 0EPJ 12.4660 2016 4C4) 70 aarrXXiivv::112212.4660 a 2016 rXiv:190 2.04470 12 pgs. 56 pgs. 17 pgs. 4 Hierarchy problem – first thoughts 5 Hierarchy problem – first thoughts In particle physics, the hierarchy problem is the large discrepancy between aspects of the weak force and gravity. 6 Hierarchy problem – first thoughts In particle physics, the hierarchy problem is the large discrepancy between aspects of the weak force and gravity.
    [Show full text]
  • Conformally Coupled General Relativity
    universe Article Conformally Coupled General Relativity Andrej Arbuzov 1,* and Boris Latosh 2 ID 1 Bogoliubov Laboratory for Theoretical Physics, JINR, Dubna 141980, Russia 2 Dubna State University, Department of Fundamental Problems of Microworld Physics, Universitetskaya str. 19, Dubna 141982, Russia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 28 December 2017; Accepted: 7 February 2018; Published: 14 February 2018 Abstract: The gravity model developed in the series of papers (Arbuzov et al. 2009; 2010), (Pervushin et al. 2012) is revisited. The model is based on the Ogievetsky theorem, which specifies the structure of the general coordinate transformation group. The theorem is implemented in the context of the Noether theorem with the use of the nonlinear representation technique. The canonical quantization is performed with the use of reparametrization-invariant time and Arnowitt– Deser–Misner foliation techniques. Basic quantum features of the models are discussed. Mistakes appearing in the previous papers are corrected. Keywords: models of quantum gravity; spacetime symmetries; higher spin symmetry 1. Introduction General relativity forms our understanding of spacetime. It is verified by the Solar System and cosmological tests [1,2]. The recent discovery of gravitational waves provided further evidence supporting the theory’s viability in the classical regime [3–6]. Despite these successes, there are reasons to believe that general relativity is unable to provide an adequate description of gravitational phenomena in the high energy regime and should be either modified or replaced by a new theory of gravity [7–11]. One of the main issues is the phenomenon of inflation. It appears that an inflationary phase of expansion is necessary for a self-consistent cosmological model [12–14].
    [Show full text]