DOCSLIB.ORG

Palouse River Temperature TMDL Study

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Quality Assurance Project Plan Palouse River Temperature Total Maximum Daily Load Study by James Kardouni; Jim Carroll; and Kirk Sinclair, L.G., L.HG Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Assessment Program Olympia, Washington 98504-7710 June 2007 Publication Number: 07-03-106 This plan is available on the Department of Ecology web site at www.ecy.wa.gov/biblio/0703106.html This plan was prepared by a licensed hydrogeologist. A signed and stamped copy of the plan is available upon request. Any use of product or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the author or the Department of Ecology. If you need this publication in an alternate format, call Carol Norsen at 360-407-7486. Persons with hearing loss can call 711 for Washington Relay Service. Persons with a speech disability can call 877-833-6341. Quality Assurance Project Plan Palouse River Temperature Total Maximum Daily Load Study June 2007 303(d) Listings Addressed in this Study Listing Waterbody New Waterbody Listing Category Old Waterbody ID ID Description ID Cycle 40638 5 Cow Creek OW46XT 2004 3723 5 Palouse River NX00WG WA-34-1030 2004 11130 5 Palouse River NX00WG WA-34-1030 2004 8115 5 Palouse River NX00WG WA-34-1030 2004 Project Code: 05-008-20 Approvals Approved by: May 2007 Elaine Snouwaert, Eastern Regional Office Date Approved by: May 2007 Dave Knight, Unit Supervisor, Eastern Regional Office Date Approved by: June 2007 Jim Bellatty, Section Manager, Eastern Regional Office Date Approved by: May 2007 Jim Carroll, Project Manager, Watershed Ecology Section Date Approved by: May 2007 James Kardouni, Principal Investigator and EIM Data Coordinator, Date Watershed Ecology Section Approved by: May 2007 Kirk Sinclair, Hydrogeologist, Watershed Ecology Section Date Approved by: May 2007 Darrel Anderson, Unit Supervisor, Nonpoint Studies Unit Date Approved by: May 2007 Will Kendra, Section Manager, Watershed Ecology Section Date Approved by: June 2007 Bill Kammin, Ecology Quality Assurance Officer Date Page 2 Table of Contents Page List of Acronyms .................................................................................................................4 Abstract................................................................................................................................5 What is a Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL)? ...............................................................6 Federal Clean Water Act Requirements ........................................................................6 Water Quality Assessment / Categories 1-5 ..................................................................6 TMDL Process Overview ..............................................................................................6 Elements Required in a TMDL......................................................................................7 Total Maximum Daily Load Analyses: Loading Capacity............................................7 Why is Ecology Conducting a TMDL study in This Watershed? ......................................8 Overview........................................................................................................................8 Project Objectives ..........................................................................................................9 Watershed Description.......................................................................................................10 Sources of Pollution.....................................................................................................15 Water Quality Standards and Beneficial Uses.............................................................16 Historical Data .............................................................................................................20 Project Description.............................................................................................................22 Study Approach ...........................................................................................................22 Data Needs...................................................................................................................24 Study Design................................................................................................................26 Measurement Procedures...................................................................................................32 Measurement Quality Objectives.......................................................................................33 Quality Control Procedures................................................................................................34 Field .............................................................................................................................34 Data Management Procedures ...........................................................................................35 Data Analysis and Temperature Modeling Procedures .....................................................36 Audits and Reports.............................................................................................................38 Data Verification and Review............................................................................................38 Data Quality (Usability) Assessment.................................................................................38 Organization and Schedule ................................................................................................39 Schedule.......................................................................................................................40 References..........................................................................................................................41 Appendix. Response to Comments on the Draft Quality Assurance Project Plan for the Palouse River Temperature TMDL Study..............................................................44 Page 3 List of Acronyms 7DADMax 7-day average of the daily maximum temperature 7DADMin 7-day average of the daily minimum temperature DMax Daily maximum temperature DMin Daily minimum temperature EAP Environmental Assessment Program, Washington State Department of Ecology EIM Environmental Information Management (system) EPA US Environmental Protection Agency IDEQ Idaho Department of Environmental Quality NFPR North Fork Palouse River (Palouse River from Idaho border to Colfax) NIST National Institute of Standards and Technology NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System ODEQ Oregon Department of Environmental Quality PCD Palouse Conservation District PST Pacific Standard Time PDT Pacific Daylight Savings Time QA Quality assurance SHU Stream Hydrology Unit, Washington State Department of Ecology TI Temperature instrument TIR Thermal infra-red remote sensing TMDL Total Maximum Daily Load USGS US Geological Survey WSDOT Washington State Department of Transportation WRIA Watershed Resource Inventory Area WWTP Wastewater treatment plant Page 4 Abstract Section 303(d) of the federal Clean Water Act requires Washington State to prepare a list of all surface waters in the state for which beneficial uses of the water are impaired by pollutants. Waterbodies placed on the 303(d) list require the preparation of a Total Maximum Daily Load study to identify and quantify sources of the impairments and to recommend implementation strategies for reducing point (discrete) and nonpoint (diffuse) source loads. The Palouse River is listed on the 303(d) list of impaired waterbodies for high instream temperatures. This Quality Assurance Project Plan describes the technical study that will (1) evaluate temperatures in the Palouse River during 2007, and (2) build on previous data collection efforts conducted by a variety of governmental and private organizations. The study will be conducted by the Washington State Department of Ecology, Environmental Assessment Program. Page 5 What is a Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL)? Federal Clean Water Act Requirements The Clean Water Act established a process to identify and clean up polluted waters. Under the Clean Water Act, each state is required to have water quality standards designed to protect, restore, and preserve water quality. Water quality standards are set to protect designated uses such as cold water biota and drinking water supply. The TMDL is a watershed plan designed to improve water quality. Every two years, states are required to prepare a list of waterbodies – lakes, rivers, streams, or marine waters – that do not meet water quality standards. This list is called the 303(d) list. To develop the list, Ecology compiles its own water quality data along with data submitted by local, state, and federal governments, tribes, industries, and citizen monitoring groups. All data are reviewed to ensure that they were collected using appropriate scientific methods before they are used to develop the 303(d) list. Water Quality Assessment / Categories 1-5 The 303(d) list is part of the larger Water Quality Assessment. The Water Quality Assessment is a list that tells a more complete story about the condition of Washington’s water. This list divides waterbodies into five categories: • Category 1 – Meets standards for parameter(s) for which it has been tested. • Category 2 – Waters of concern. • Category 3 – Waters with no data available. • Category 4 – Polluted waters that do not require a TMDL because: o 4a – Has a TMDL approved and it is being implemented
Recommended publications
  • Washington Division of Geology and Earth Resources Open File Report

    Washington Division of Geology and Earth Resources Open File Report

    RECONNAISSANCE SURFICIAL GEOLOGIC MAPPING OF THE LATE CENOZOIC SEDIMENTS OF THE COLUMBIA BASIN, WASHINGTON by James G. Rigby and Kurt Othberg with contributions from Newell Campbell Larry Hanson Eugene Kiver Dale Stradling Gary Webster Open File Report 79-3 September 1979 State of Washington Department of Natural Resources Division of Geology and Earth Resources Olympia, Washington CONTENTS Introduction Objectives Study Area Regional Setting 1 Mapping Procedure 4 Sample Collection 8 Description of Map Units 8 Pre-Miocene Rocks 8 Columbia River Basalt, Yakima Basalt Subgroup 9 Ellensburg Formation 9 Gravels of the Ancestral Columbia River 13 Ringold Formation 15 Thorp Gravel 17 Gravel of Terrace Remnants 19 Tieton Andesite 23 Palouse Formation and Other Loess Deposits 23 Glacial Deposits 25 Catastrophic Flood Deposits 28 Background and previous work 30 Description and interpretation of flood deposits 35 Distinctive geomorphic features 38 Terraces and other features of undetermined origin 40 Post-Pleistocene Deposits 43 Landslide Deposits 44 Alluvium 45 Alluvial Fan Deposits 45 Older Alluvial Fan Deposits 45 Colluvium 46 Sand Dunes 46 Mirna Mounds and Other Periglacial(?) Patterned Ground 47 Structural Geology 48 Southwest Quadrant 48 Toppenish Ridge 49 Ah tanum Ridge 52 Horse Heaven Hills 52 East Selah Fault 53 Northern Saddle Mountains and Smyrna Bench 54 Selah Butte Area 57 Miscellaneous Areas 58 Northwest Quadrant 58 Kittitas Valley 58 Beebe Terrace Disturbance 59 Winesap Lineament 60 Northeast Quadrant 60 Southeast Quadrant 61 Recommendations 62 Stratigraphy 62 Structure 63 Summary 64 References Cited 66 Appendix A - Tephrochronology and identification of collected datable materials 82 Appendix B - Description of field mapping units 88 Northeast Quadrant 89 Northwest Quadrant 90 Southwest Quadrant 91 Southeast Quadrant 92 ii ILLUSTRATIONS Figure 1.
  • Palouse River Tributaries Subbasin Assessment and TMDL

    Palouse River Tributaries Subbasin Assessment and TMDL

    Palouse River Tributaries Subbasin Assessment and TMDL Idaho Department of Environmental Quality January 2005 This Page Intentionally Left Blank. Palouse River Tributaries Subbasin Assessment and TMDL January 2005 Prepared by: Robert D. Henderson Lewiston Regional Office Idaho Department of Environmental Quality 1118 F. Street Lewiston, ID 83501 This Page Intentionally Left Blank. Palouse River Tributaries Subbasin Assessment and TMDL January 2005 Acknowledgments Completing this Subbasin Assessment and TMDL would not have been possible without the support of the following individuals and organizations: • Mark Shumar • Alan Monek • Brock Morgan • Barbara Anderson • Dennis Meier • Palouse River Watershed Advisory Group • Tom Dechert • Cary Myler • Jason Fales • William Kelly • John Cardwell • Ken Clark • Bill Dansart • Richard Lee • John Gravelle • Marti Bridges • Daniel Stewart Thank you! Cover photo by Robert D. Henderson i Palouse River Tributaries Subbasin Assessment and TMDL January 2005 This Page Intentionally Left Blank. ii Palouse River Tributaries Subbasin Assessment and TMDL January 2005 Table of Contents Abbreviations, Acronyms, and Symbols .......................................................xiii Executive Summary........................................................................................xvii Subbasin at a Glance .................................................................................................xvii Key Findings .............................................................................................................
  • Palouse River and Coulee City Rail Line

    Palouse River and Coulee City Rail Line

    Palouse River and Coulee City Rail Line Palouse River and Coulee City Rail Line For More Information: Mike Rowswell WSDOT State Rail and Marine Office [email protected] 360-705-7900 360-705-7930 www.wsdot.wa.gov/rail www.wsdot.wa.gov/projects/rail/PCC_Acquisition/ WSDOT State Rail and Marine Office The Palouse River and Coulee PO Box 47407 City (PCC) rail line is the state’s Olympia, WA 98504-7407 longest short-line freight rail system and spans four counties in eastern Washington. In 2007, the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) completed the purchase of this rail line to save it from abandonment. January 2008 Palouse River and Coulee City Rail Line What is the Palouse River and Coulee City deteriorated over time. After attempting to develop Who is going to operate these lines? (PCC) Rail Line? business for a number of years, Watco finally WSDOT is working with local governments to discuss considered abandoning the lines because they As part of the purchase agreement, Watco will formation of an intergovernmental entity to govern were not profitable. In making that determination, the three branches. When such an entity is formed, it The former Palouse River and Coulee City (PCC) continue to operate the PV Hooper Branch under a Watco cited the expensive maintenance conditions will assume responsibility for the former PCC system. rail line is a 300-mile short-line freight rail system lease signed with the state in November 2004 and mentioned above, increased competition from the WSDOT will continue to oversee rehabilitation work that provides direct rail service to shippers, modified in 2007.
  • National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet

    National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet

    RECEIVED 2280 NFS Form 10-900 OMB No. 10024-0018 (Oct. 1990) Oregon WordPerfect 6.0 Format (Revised July 1998) National Register of Historic Places iC PLACES Registration Form • NATIONAL : A SERVICE This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations of eligibility for individual properties or districts. See instructions in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking Y in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A"for "not applicable. For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NFS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer to complete all items. 1. Name of Property historic name The La Grande Commercial Historic District other names/site number N/A 2. Location street & number Roughly bounded by the U.P Railroad tracts along Jefferson St, on __not for publication the north; Greenwood and Cove streets on the east; Washington St. on __ vicinity the south; & Fourth St. on the west. city or town La Grande state Oregon code OR county Union code 61 zip code 97850 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this ^nomination request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60.
  • Digital Commons @

    Digital Commons @

    sALUMnotesALUMnotesALUMnotesALUMnotesALUMno Western Oregon University April 2007WOUMagazine 1 Alum n o tes Western Oregon University You watch your financesclosely . They do their best. The average education loan debt of many college students when they graduate exceeds the national average credit card debt of $9,000. Yesterday’s Western Oregon University student could work a summer job and earn enough money to pay their next year’s tuition and expenses. Over half of today’s WOU students work in the summer and during the school year to help pay for tuition and expenses. And still they graduate with an average education loan debt of nearly $20,000. Your contribution in support of student scholarships absolutely makes a difference! • Outright gifts • Gifts of appreciated assets such as property and securities • Charitable gift annuities Contact James Birken Director of Gift Planning Western Oregon University University Advancement The Cottage Monmouth, Oregon 97361 503-838-8145 [email protected] Western Oregon University Magazine © April 2007 • Volume 8, No. 2 What’s Inside PRESIDENT John P. Minahan Washington EXECUTIVE EDITOR Leta Edwards Vice President for University Advancement Envisioning the MANAGING EDITOR ‘06 Maria Austin future Coordinator of Alumni Programs 4 Oregon President discusses his three-year Idaho CONTRIBUTING WRITERS vision for WOU Maria Austin Russ Blunck Lori Jordan Brown Craig Coleman Leta Edwards Being prepared Lisa Pulliam WOU-based Homeland Security Nevada Alaska PHOTOGRAPHERS 6 grant assists Native Americans Lori
  • An Overview Sally Campbell, Dave Azuma, Dale Weyermann

    An Overview Sally Campbell, Dave Azuma, Dale Weyermann

    Forests of Western Oregon: An Overview Sally Campbell, Dave Azuma, Dale Weyermann United States Pacific Northwest Forest Research Station Department of Service Agriculture PNW-GTR-525 April 2002 Revised 2004 Authors Sally Campbell is a plant pathologist, Dave Azuma is a research forester, and Dale Weyermann is geographic information system manager, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, P.O. Box 3890, Portland, OR 97208-3890. Cover: Southwest Oregon Photo by Tom Iraci. Above: Oregon Coast Photo by Don Gedney Forests of Western Oregon: An Overview Sally Campbell, Dave Azuma, and Dale Weyermann U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station Portland, OR April 2002 State Forester’s Welcome Dear Reader: Western Oregon has some of the most productive forest lands in the world, important for sustainable supplies of fish and wildlife habitat, recreation, timber, clean water, and many other values that Oregonians hold dear.The Oregon Department of Forestry and the USDA Forest Service invite you to read this overview of western Oregon forests, which illustrates the importance these forests have to our forest industries and quality of life.This publication has been made possible by the USDA FS Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) program, with support from the Oregon Department of Forestry. The Oregon Department of Forestry and FIA have a long history of collaboration that has benefited both agencies and others who use the data and the information developed from it.This report was developed from data gathered by FIA in western Oregon’s forests between 1994 and 1997, and has been supplemented by inventories from Oregon’s national forests and the Bureau of Land Management.We greatly appreciate FIA’s willingness to collect information in addition to that usually collected in forest inventories, data about insects and disease, young stands, and land use change and development.
  • Shoreline Restoration Plan

    Shoreline Restoration Plan

    Whitman County Coalition Shoreline Restoration Plan available on the City’s website expands on the previous goal in the Environment element with the following vision statement: “Maintain a system of habitat, recreation lands, and facilities in Palouse that defines and enhances the built and natural environment. Support and nurture plant and wildlife habitat, offer a well-balanced range of recreation opportunities which enriches the lives of Palouse's citizens.” Policies and strategies designed to achieve this vision are included in the plan which would significantly improve ecological function in the City. EXISTING AND ONGOING PLANS AND PROGRAMS State, regional, and local agencies and organizations are actively involved in shoreline restoration, conservation, and protection in and around Whitman County. These partners and their local roles in shoreline protection and/or restoration are identified below. 4.1 Whitman County Comprehensive Plan The County’s Comprehensive Plan contains an Environmental Quality and Conservation Element providing policies related to conservation of natural resources. The County has developed guidelines for implementing Comprehensive Plan goals (See Section 3) related to natural resource protection. These focus on policies, regulations, and procedures governing critical and sensitive areas and include: Designating and mapping critical environmental sites and ceasing exemption of dwellings within designated areas from Environmental Impact Statement requirements when a Threshold Determination of Significance is reached. Incorporating goals and guidelines into Whitman County ordinance governing SEPA review. Use the removal of the exemption (above) as an opportunity to evaluate impacts of single-family homes, employ mitigation measures, preserve vegetative cover, and modify locations of buildings and roads. The Plan presents implementation guidelines that incorporate procedural and regulatory frameworks.
  • Miocene Evolution of the Moscow-Pullman Basin, Idaho and Washington

    Miocene Evolution of the Moscow-Pullman Basin, Idaho and Washington

    Miocene Evolution of the Moscow-Pullman Basin, Idaho and Washington John H. Bush Pamela Dunlap Stephen P. Reidel Idaho Geological Survey University of Idaho Technical Report 18-3 Moscow, Idaho 83844-3014 December 2018 This Technical Report is a product of independent work from non-Idaho Geological Survey personnel. This report is published by the IGS to further future scientific studies. The IGS does not guarantee this report to be free of errors nor assume liability for interpretations made from this report, or decisions based thereon. TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract 1 Introduction 1 Stratigraphic Framework and Previous Work 4 History of Regional Stratigraphic Framework 11 Previous Work in the Moscow-Pullman Area 11 Well Chips and Columbia River Basalt Group Stratigraphy 11 Latah Formation 12 Structual Setting 14 Paleogeography 15 Introduction and Pre-basalt Topography 15 Grande Ronde Basalt R1 Interval 17 Grande Ronde Basalt N1 Interval 17 Grande Ronde Basalt R2 Interval 20 Grande Ronde Basalt N2 Interval 23 Vantage and Wanapum Intervals 25 Saddle Mountains Time 29 Summary and Conclusions 31 Acknowledgments 31 References Cited 32 Appendix A. Geochemical Identification of Flow Units in the Columbia River Basalt Group 37 Introduction 37 Oldest Flows of the Columbia River Basalt Group 37 Grande Ronde Basalt Members and Flows 37 Wanapum Basalt 38 References Cited 41 Appendix B Regional Rock Samples 42 Figures Figure 1. Map showing the areal extent of the Columbia River flood basalt province. 2 Figure 2 Map showing Moscow-Pullman Basin, wells,
  • Geologic Formations of Western Oregon

    Geologic Formations of Western Oregon

    BULLETIN 70 GEOLOGIC fORMATION§ OF WESTERN OREGON WEST OF LONGITUDE 121° 30' STATE OF OREGON DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY AND MINERAL INDUSTRIES 1971 STATE OF OREGON DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY AND MINERAL INDUSTRIES 1069 Stal·e Office Building Portland, Oregon 97201 BULLETIN 70 GEOLOGIC FORMATIONS OF WESTERN OREGON (WEST OF LONGITUDE 12 1 °30') By John D. Beaulieu 1971 GOVERNING BOARD Fayette I. Bristol, Rogue River, Chairman R. W. deWeese, Portland Harold Banta, Baker STATE GEOLOGIST R. E. Corcoran CONTENTS Introduction . Acknowledgements 2 Geologic formations 3 Quadrang I es. 53 Corre I ation charts. 60 Bibliography. 63 ii GE OLOGIC FORMA T IONS OF WESTERN OR EGON (W E ST OF LONG ITUD E 12 1°30') By John D. Beaulieu* INTRODUCTION It is the purpose of th is publi cation to provide a concise , yet comprehensive discussion of the for­ mations of western Oregon. It is the further aim that the data for each of the formations be as current as possi ble. Consequently, the emphasis has been placed on th e recent literature . Although this paper should not be viewed as a discussion of the historical development of each of the fo rmations, the original reference for each of the units is given . Also, in cases where the historical development of the formation has a direct bearing on present-day problems it is included in the discussion . A wide variety of published literature and unpublished reports , theses, and dissertations was con­ sul ted and several professional opin ions regarding specific problems were so licited . In recent years re­ search has been concentrated in the Klamath Mountains and the southern Coast Range and for these regions literature was volumi nous.
  • Introduction .Of Washington Geographic Names, a Study

    Introduction .Of Washington Geographic Names, a Study

    NOTES ON EARLY SETTLEMENTS AND ON GEOGRAPHIC NAMES OF EASTERN WASHINGTON Introduction The article which follows is a by-product of several mmor studies in the economic history of eastern Washington. Although not intended as such, it turns out to be, in some respects, an appen­ dix, or perhaps a series of footnotes, to Professor Meany's Origin . of Washington Geographic Names, a study published serially in this magazine and subsequently brought out as a volume by the Uni­ versity of Washington Press in 1923. The article contains some names not included in Professor Meany's study, elaborations of a few of his entries, and, in rare instances, slight corrections of his work. To facilitate comparison, frequent references are made to the above-mentioned volume. But the present article is conceived in a different spirit from that of Professor Meany's study. His interest centered in the origins of names; mine has consisted primarily in assembling data relating to early settlements in one area of Washington. Other entries in my article are incidental. By means of the data herein assembled the story of the occupation of the area north of the Snake River in eastern Washington during the seventies and the eighties can be traced in outline, and the principal factors which determined the sites of pioneer towns can be seen in operation. Not the least important of these factors was transportation. During the decade of the seventies the pioneers of eastern Washington were in large measure economically dependent on the Columbia River system. Down the Snake and Columbia rivers was shipped the produce of the "upper country," and up these rivers were transported immi­ grants and equipment needed for the economic development of the Palouse and Spokane countries.* And to some extent settlers south of the Snake River were dependent on the navigation of that stream.
  • SFTA Research Report #6

    SFTA Research Report #6

    An Assessment of the Current Situation of the Palouse River and Coulee City Railroad and the Future Role of the Port of Whitman County Kenneth L. Casavant SFTA Principal Investigator and Eric L. Jessup SFTA Co-Principal Investigator Joe Poire SFTA Research Report # 6 October 2003 An Assessment of the Current Situation of the Palouse River and Coulee City Railroad and the Future Role of the Port of Whitman County by Kenneth L. Casavant SFTA Principal Investigator Eric L. Jessup SFTA Co-Principal Investigator and Joe Poire SFTA Research Report #6 September 2003 Washington State University Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics 101 Hulbert Hall Pullman, Washington 99164-6210 SFTA Research Reports: Background and Purpose This is the sixth of a series of reports prepared from the Strategic Freight Transportation Analysis (SFTA) study. SFTA is a six year comprehensive research and implementation analysis that will provide information (data and direction) for local, state and national investments and decisions designed to achieve the goal of seamless transportation. The overall SFTA scope includes the following goals and objectives: • Improving knowledge about freight corridors. • Assessing the operations of roadways, rail systems, ports and barges – freight choke points. • Analyze modal cost structures and competitive mode shares. • Assess potential economic development opportunities. • Conduct case studies of public/private transportation costs. • Evaluate the opportunity for public/private partnerships. The five specific work tasks
  • OWEB 212-2044 Comp Report

    OWEB 212-2044 Comp Report

    1 Coho Life History in Tide Gated Lowland Coastal Streams OWEB Grant 212-2044 Project Completion Report Submitted by Coos Watershed Association March 13, 2015 Project Summary Coos Watershed Association’s (CoosWA) coho Life Cycle Monitoring Project (LCM) is a continuation of a long-term monitoring study initiated in 2004 to examine coho salmon abundance, survival, life histories and habitat use in two tide gated coastal lowland streams, Larson and Palouse Creeks. Productive utilization of these remarkable habitat types is critical for the recovery and sustainability of Oregon Coastal coho. Specifically, this project developed, and adapted innovative mark recapture techniques using PIT tags to monitor the coho life cycle, further evaluated over-winter rearing strategies in relation to temporal and spatial habitat use and continued project effectiveness monitoring in these study streams. In addition, coho diet analyses were designed and conducted and will be analyzed in relation to seasonal and diurnal variations in environmental factors in order to assess proximal causes of habitat productivity. Background Study Area. Palouse and Larson Creeks are two third order lowland streams that flow into Haynes inlet, the northern most portion of the estuary in Coos Bay, Oregon (Figure 1). Each stream is tide gated at its confluence with the Coos Bay estuary along the dike that supports North Bay Road. Palouse Creek is controlled by two top-hinged gates and Larson Creek has two side-hinged gates. Palouse Creek is 14.6 km long, and has a natural barrier to coho at river kilometer (RKm) 12.1. The Larson Creek mainstem is 12.9 km in length.