DOCSLIB.ORG

The Rational Unified Process an Introduction, Second Edition

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

UNREGISTERED VERSION OF CHM TO PDF CONVERTER PRO BY THETA-SOFTWARE UNREGISTERED VERSION OF CHM TO PDF CONVERTER PRO BY THETA-SOFTWARE Front Matter Table of Contents About the Author The Rational Unified Process An Introduction, Second Edition Philippe Kruchten Publisher: Addison Wesley Second Edition March 14, 2000 ISBN: 0-201-70710-1, 320 pages The Rational Unified Process is unique in that it allows development teams to recognize the full benefits of the Unified Modeling Language (UML), software automation, and other industry best practices. The Rational Unified Process unifies the entire software development team and optimizes the productivity of every team member by putting the collective experience derived from thousands of projects and many industry leaders at your fingertips. With this book as your guide, you will be able to more easily produce the highest-quality software. Throughout the book, the author shares his inside knowledge of the process, focusing his coverage on key aspects that are critical to mastering this proven approach to software development. This Second Edition has been updated to match and reflect the contents of the latest version of the Rational Unified Process. RUP 2000 offers: roadmaps that provide overviews of how to apply the process to a wide variety of projects and technologies; expanded analysis of testing, spanning the entire product lifecycle; improved coverage of application interface design--especially as it applies to developing effective web applications; and, insights into designing systems using patterns and frameworks. The Rational Unified Process An Introduction, Second Edition Preface GOALS OF THIS BOOK WHO SHOULD READ THIS BOOK? HOW TO USE THIS BOOK ORGANIZATION AND SPECIAL FEATURES FOR MORE INFORMATION SECOND EDITION ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 1. Software Development Best Practices THE VALUE OF SOFTWARE SYMPTOMS AND ROOT CAUSES OF SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT PROBLEMS SOFTWARE BEST PRACTICES DEVELOP SOFTWARE ITERATIVELY MANAGE REQUIREMENTS USE COMPONENT-BASED ARCHITECTURES VISUALLY MODEL SOFTWARE CONTINUOUSLY VERIFY SOFTWARE QUALITY CONTROL CHANGES TO SOFTWARE THE RATIONAL UNIFIED PROCESS SUMMARY 2. The Rational Unified Process WHAT IS THE RATIONAL UNIFIED PROCESS? THE RATIONAL UNIFIED PROCESS AS AS A PRODUCT PROCESS STRUCTURE: TWO DIMENSIONS SOFTWARE BEST PRACTICES IN THE RATIONAL UNIFIED PROCESS OTHER KEY FEATURES OF THE RATIONAL UNIFIED PROCESS A BRIEF HISTORY OF THE RATIONAL UNIFIED PROCESS SUMMARY 3. Static Structure: Process Description A MODEL OF THE RATIONAL UNIFIED PROCESS WORKERS ACTIVITIES ARTIFACTS WORKFLOWS ADDITIONAL PROCESS ELEMENTS A PROCESS FRAMEWORK SUMMARY 4. Dynamic Structure: Iterative Development THE SEQUENTIAL PROCESS UNREGISTERED OVERCOMING VERSION DIFFICULTIES: OF CHM TO ITERATE! PDF CONVERTER PRO BY THETA-SOFTWARE GAINING CONTROL: PHASES AND MILESTONES A SHIFTING FOCUS ACROSS THE CYCLE PHASES REVISITED BENEFITS OF AN ITERATIVE APPROACH SUMMARY UNREGISTERED VERSION OF CHM TO PDF CONVERTER PRO BY THETA-SOFTWARE 5. An Architecture-centric Process THE IMPORTANCE OF MODELS ARCHITECTURE THE IMPORTANCE OF ARCHITECTURE A DEFINITION OF ARCHITECTURE ARCHITECTURE REPRESENTATION AN ARCHITECTURE-CENTRIC PROCESS THE PURPOSE OF ARCHITECTURE COMPONENT-BASED DEVELOPMENT OTHER ARCHITECTURAL CONCEPTS SUMMARY 6. A Use-Case-Driven Process DEFINITIONS IDENTIFYING USE CASES EVOLVING USE CASES ORGANIZING USE CASES USE CASES IN THE PROCESS SUMMARY 7. The Project Management Workflow PURPOSE PLANNING AN ITERATIVE PROJECT THE CONCEPT OF RISK THE CONCEPT OF METRICS WHAT IS A METRIC? WORKERS AND ARTIFACTS WORKFLOW BUILDING AN ITERATION PLAN SUMMARY 8. The Business Modeling Workflow PURPOSE WHY BUSINESS MODELING? USING SOFTWARE ENGINEERING TECHNIQUES FOR BUSINESS MODELING BUSINESS MODELING SCENARIOS WORKERS AND ARTIFACTS WORKFLOW FROM THE BUSINESS MODELS TO THE SYSTEMS MODELING THE SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT BUSINESS TOOL SUPPORT SUMMARY 9. The Requirements Workflow PURPOSE WHAT IS A REQUIREMENT? TYPES OF REQUIREMENTS CAPTURING AND MANAGING REQUIREMENTS DESIGNING A USER-CENTERED INTERFACE REQUIREMENTS WORKFLOW WORKERS IN REQUIREMENTS ARTIFACTS USED IN REQUIREMENTS TOOL SUPPORT SUMMARY 10. The Analysis and Design Workflow PURPOSE ANALYSIS VERSUS DESIGN HOW FAR MUST DESIGN GO? WORKERS AND ARTIFACTS THE DESIGN MODEL THE ANALYSIS MODEL THE ROLE OF INTERFACES ARTIFACTS FOR REAL-TIME SYSTEMS COMPONENT-BASED DESIGN WORKFLOW TOOL SUPPORT SUMMARY 11. The Implementation Workflow PURPOSE BUILDS INTEGRATION PROTOTYPES WORKERS AND ARTIFACTS WORKFLOW TOOL SUPPORT SUMMARY 12. The Test Workflow PURPOSE QUALITY TESTING IN THE ITERATIVE LIFECYCLE DIMENSIONS OF TESTING THE TEST MODEL WORKERS AND ARTIFACTS WORKFLOW TOOL SUPPORT SUMMARY 13. The Configuration and Change Management Workflow PURPOSE THE CCM CUBE WORKERS AND ARTIFACTS WORKFLOW TOOL SUPPORT SUMMARY UNREGISTERED VERSION OF CHM TO PDF CONVERTER PRO BY THETA-SOFTWARE 14. The Environment Workflow PURPOSE WORKERS AND ARTIFACTS WORKFLOW SUMMARY UNREGISTERED VERSION OF CHM TO PDF CONVERTER PRO BY THETA-SOFTWARE 15. The Deployment Workflow PURPOSE WORKERS AND ARTIFACTS WORKFLOW SUMMARY 16. Typical Iteration Plans PURPOSE DEFINING THE PRODUCT VISION AND THE BUSINESS CASE BUILDING AN ARCHITECTURAL PROTOTYPE IMPLEMENTING THE SYSTEM SUMMARY 17. Configuring and Implementing the Rational Unified Process INTRODUCTION THE EFFECT OF IMPLEMENTING A PROCESS IMPLEMENTING THE RATIONAL UNIFIED PROCESS STEP BY STEP CONFIGURING THE PROCESS IMPLEMENTING A PROCESS IS A PROJECT SUMMARY A. Summary of Workers B. Summary of Artifacts Business Modeling Artifact Set Requirements Artifact Set Analysis and Design Artifact Set Implementation Artifact Set Test Artifact Set Deployment Artifact Set Configuration and Change Management Artifact Set Project Management Artifact Set Environment Artifact Set Acronyms Glossary Glossary Bibliography UNREGISTERED VERSION OF CHM TO PDF CONVERTER PRO BY THETA-SOFTWARE UNREGISTERED VERSION OF CHM TO PDF CONVERTER PRO BY THETA-SOFTWARE The Rational Unified Process An Introduction, Second Edition Many of the designations used by manufacturers and sellers to distinguish their products are claimed as trademarks. Where those designations appear in this book and we were aware of a trademark claim, designations have been printed in initial capital letters or in all capitals. The author and publisher have taken care in the preparation of this book, but make no expressed or implied warranty of any kind and assume no responsibility for errors or omissions. No liability is assumed for incidental or consequential damages in connection with or arising out of the use of the information or programs contained herein. Rational, the Rational logo, and Rational Unified Process are trademarks or registered trademarks of Rational Software Corporation in the United States and in other countries. All other names are used for identification purposes only and are trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective companies. Windows, Windows NT, Word, Internet Explorer, FrontPage, and Visual Basic are trademarks or registered trademarks of Microsoft. The publisher offers discounts on this book when ordered in quantity for special sales. For more information, please contact: AWL Direct Sales Addison Wesley Longman, Inc One Jacob Way Reading, Massachusetts 01867 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Kruchten, Philippe. The rational unified process: an introduction /Philippe Kruchten-2nd ed. p.cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-201-70710-1 1.Computer software-Development.2.Software engineering.I.Title. QA76.76.D47 K79 2000 005.1--dc2100-025829 Copyright Information Copyright © 2000 by Addison Wesley All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form, or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior consent of the publisher. Printed in the United States of America. Published simultaneously in Canada. Text printed on recycled and acid-free paper. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10–MA–04 03 02 01 00 Second printing, July 2000 To Sylvie, Alice, Zoé, and Nicolas Preface The Rational Unified Process is a software engineering process developed and marketed by UNREGISTEREDRational Software. VERSION It is OFa disciplined CHM TO approachPDF CONVERTER to assigning PRO and BY managing THETA-SOFTWARE tasks and responsibilities in a development organization. The goal of this process is to produce, within a predictable schedule and budget, high-quality software that meets the needs of its end users. The Rational Unified Process captures many of the best practices in modern software development and presents them in a tailorable form that is suitable for a wide range of UNREGISTERED VERSION OF CHM TO PDF CONVERTER PRO BY THETA-SOFTWARE projects and organizations. The Rational Unified Process delivers these best practices to the project team online in a detailed, practical form. This book provides an introduction to the concepts, structure, contents, and motivation of the Rational Unified Process. GOALS OF THIS BOOK In this book, you will learn what the Rational Unified Process is and what it is not; master the vocabulary of the Rational Unified Process and understand its structure; develop an appreciation for the best practices that we have synthesized in this process; and understand how the Rational Unified Process can give you the guidance you need for your specific responsibility in a project. This book is an integral part of the Rational Unified Process,
Recommended publications
  • Uml.Sty, a Package for Writing UML Diagrams in LATEX

    Uml.Sty, a Package for Writing UML Diagrams in LATEX

    uml.sty, a package for writing UML diagrams in LATEX Ellef Fange Gjelstad March 17, 2010 Contents 1 Syntax for all the commands 5 1.1 Lengths ........................................ 5 1.2 Angles......................................... 5 1.3 Nodenames...................................... 6 1.4 Referencepoints ................................. 6 1.5 Colors ......................................... 6 1.6 Linestyles...................................... 6 2 uml.sty options 6 2.1 debug ......................................... 6 2.2 index.......................................... 6 3 Object-oriented approach 7 3.1 Colors ......................................... 10 3.2 Positions....................................... 10 4 Drawable 12 4.1 Namedoptions .................................... 12 4.1.1 import..................................... 12 5 Element 12 5.1 Namedoptions .................................... 12 5.1.1 Reference ................................... 12 5.1.2 Stereotype................................... 12 5.1.3 Subof ..................................... 13 5.1.4 ImportedFrom ................................ 13 5.1.5 Comment ................................... 13 6 Box 13 6.1 Namedoptionsconcerninglocation . ....... 13 6.2 Boxesintext ..................................... 14 6.3 Named options concerning visual appearance . ......... 14 6.3.1 grayness.................................... 14 6.3.2 border..................................... 14 1 6.3.3 borderLine .................................. 14 6.3.4 innerBorder.................................
  • Rational Unified Process - an Overview Uppsala, 2009-02-10

    Rational Unified Process - an Overview Uppsala, 2009-02-10

    Rational Unified Process - an overview Uppsala, 2009-02-10 Mikael Broomé Consultant M.Sc. LTH 10 years in Software Development 4 different RUP implementations Project Manager Mentor for Project Managers Applying more and more of agile mindset and techniques E-Mail: [email protected] 2 1 Agenda Why a process for developing software? What is RUP? What is the “RUP-way” of developing software? How is RUP packaged? Advantages by using RUP? Challenges when using RUP? Relation to other processes? 3 A good project delivers the right solution: satisified Users satisfied Sponsor delivers in time delivers on budget 4 2 Challenges Common challenges in software development projects: Capture the “right” requirements. Requirement changes. Different parts of the system do not fit together. Small changes causes big problems. Low quality and poor performance. Major problems identified late in projects. Lack of communication. Difficult to estimate time and cost. Management of environment, platforms and tools. 5 It’s all about (lack of) communication 6 3 Agenda Why a process for developing software? What is RUP? What is the “RUP-way” of developing software? How is RUP packaged? Advantages by using RUP? Challenges when using RUP? Relation to other processes? 7 What is RUP and UML? RUP is a process for development of software that describes what should be performed (activities) who should do it (roles) what the result should be (artifacts). UML is a notation with defined symbols that is worked out by OMG (Object Management Group) is used to make drawings (for example in software development). 8 4 Agenda Why a process for developing software? What is RUP? What is the “RUP-way” of developing software? How is RUP packaged? Advantages by using RUP? Challenges when using RUP? Relation to other processes? 9 JW2 RUP’s Six Best practices 1.
  • UML Tutorial: Part 1 -- Class Diagrams

    UML Tutorial: Part 1 -- Class Diagrams

    UML Tutorial: Part 1 -- Class Diagrams. Robert C. Martin My next several columns will be a running tutorial of UML. The 1.0 version of UML was released on the 13th of January, 1997. The 1.1 release should be out before the end of the year. This col- umn will track the progress of UML and present the issues that the three amigos (Grady Booch, Jim Rumbaugh, and Ivar Jacobson) are dealing with. Introduction UML stands for Unified Modeling Language. It represents a unification of the concepts and nota- tions presented by the three amigos in their respective books1. The goal is for UML to become a common language for creating models of object oriented computer software. In its current form UML is comprised of two major components: a Meta-model and a notation. In the future, some form of method or process may also be added to; or associated with, UML. The Meta-model UML is unique in that it has a standard data representation. This representation is called the meta- model. The meta-model is a description of UML in UML. It describes the objects, attributes, and relationships necessary to represent the concepts of UML within a software application. This provides CASE manufacturers with a standard and unambiguous way to represent UML models. Hopefully it will allow for easy transport of UML models between tools. It may also make it easier to write ancillary tools for browsing, summarizing, and modifying UML models. A deeper discussion of the metamodel is beyond the scope of this column. Interested readers can learn more about it by downloading the UML documents from the rational web site2.
  • The Timeboxing Process Model for Iterative Software Development

    The Timeboxing Process Model for Iterative Software Development

    The Timeboxing Process Model for Iterative Software Development Pankaj Jalote Department of Computer Science and Engineering Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur – 208016; India Aveejeet Palit, Priya Kurien Infosys Technologies Limited Electronics City Bangalore – 561 229; India Contact: [email protected] ABSTRACT In today’s business where speed is of essence, an iterative development approach that allows the functionality to be delivered in parts has become a necessity and an effective way to manage risks. In an iterative process, the development of a software system is done in increments, each increment forming of an iteration and resulting in a working system. A common iterative approach is to decide what should be developed in an iteration and then plan the iteration accordingly. A somewhat different iterative is approach is to time box different iterations. In this approach, the length of an iteration is fixed and what should be developed in an iteration is adjusted to fit the time box. Generally, the time boxed iterations are executed in sequence, with some overlap where feasible. In this paper we propose the timeboxing process model that takes the concept of time boxed iterations further by adding pipelining concepts to it for permitting overlapped execution of different iterations. In the timeboxing process model, each time boxed iteration is divided into equal length stages, each stage having a defined function and resulting in a clear work product that is handed over to the next stage. With this division into stages, pipelining concepts are employed to have multiple time boxes executing concurrently, leading to a reduction in the delivery time for product releases.
  • Network Visualization with R Katherine Ognyanova, POLNET 2015 Workshop, Portland OR

    Network Visualization with R Katherine Ognyanova, POLNET 2015 Workshop, Portland OR

    Network visualization with R Katherine Ognyanova, www.kateto.net POLNET 2015 Workshop, Portland OR Contents Introduction: Network Visualization2 Data format, size, and preparation4 DATASET 1: edgelist ......................................4 DATASET 2: matrix .......................................5 Network visualization: first steps with igraph 5 A brief detour I: Colors in R plots8 A brief detour II: Fonts in R plots 11 Back to our main plot line: plotting networks 12 Plotting parameters ........................................ 12 Network Layouts ......................................... 17 Highlighting aspects of the network ............................... 24 Highlighting specific nodes or links ............................... 27 Interactive plotting with tkplot ................................. 29 Other ways to represent a network ............................... 30 Plotting two-mode networks with igraph ............................ 31 Quick example using the network package 35 Interactive and animated network visualizations 37 Interactive D3 Networks in R .................................. 37 Simple Plot Animations in R .................................. 38 Interactive networks with ndtv-d3 ................................ 39 Interactive plots of static networks............................ 39 Network evolution animations............................... 40 1 Introduction: Network Visualization The main concern in designing a network visualization is the purpose it has to serve. What are the structural properties that we want to highlight?
  • Software Architecture and Agility

    Software Architecture and Agility

    Agility and Architecture May 18 2010 Agility and Architecture: An Oxymoron? Philippe Kruchten Saturn May 18, 2010 Philippe Kruchten, Ph.D., P.Eng., CSDP Professor of So)ware Engineering NSERC Chair in Design Engineering Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of BriIsh Columbia Vancouver, BC Canada [email protected] Founder and president Kruchten Engineering Services Ltd Vancouver, BC Canada [email protected] Philippe Kruchten 1 Agility and Architecture May 18 2010 Agile & Architecture? Oil & Water? • Paradox • Oxymoron • Conflict • IncompaIbility Outline • Agility?? • SoSware architecture? • A story • Seven viewpoints on a single problem • The zipper model • A clash of two cultures • Summary Philippe Kruchten 2 Agility and Architecture May 18 2010 Agility • A definiIon – Agility is the ability to both create and respond to change in order to profit in a turbulent business environment. Jim Highsmith (2002) • CharacterisIcs – IteraIve and incremental – Small release – Collocaon – Release plan/ feature backlog – IteraIon plan/task backlog Sanjiv AugusIne (2004) Agile Values: the Agile Manifesto We have come to value: • Individuals and interacIons over process and tools, • Working soSware over comprehensive documents, • Customer collaboraIon over contract negoIaIon, • Responding to change over following a plan. That is, while there is value in the items on the right, we value the items on the leS more Source: hp://www.agilemanifesto.org/ Philippe Kruchten 3 Agility and Architecture May 18 2010 Geng at the Essence of Agility • SoSware development is a knowledge acIvity – Not producIon, manufacturing, administraIon… • The “machines” are humans • Dealing with uncertainty, unknowns, fear, distrust • Feedback loop -> – reflect on business, requirements, risks, process, people, technology • CommunicaIon and collaboraIon -> – Building trust Named Agile Methods • XP = eXtreme Programming (K.
  • Best Practice of SOA

    Best Practice of SOA

    JOURNAL OF COMPUTING, VOLUME 2, ISSUE 2, FEBRUARY 2010, ISSN: 2151-9617 38 HTTPS://SITES.GOOGLE.COM/SITE/JOURNALOFCOMPUTING/ Improvement in RUP Project Management via Service Monitoring: Best Practice of SOA Sheikh Muhammad Saqib1, Shakeel Ahmad1, Shahid Hussain 2, Bashir Ahmad 1 and Arjamand Bano3 1Institute of Computing and Information Technology Gomal University, D.I.Khan, Pakistan 2 Namal University, Mianwali , Pakistan 3 Mathematics Department Gomal University, D.I.Khan, Pakistan Abstract-- Management of project planning, monitoring, scheduling, estimation and risk management are critical issues faced by a project manager during development life cycle of software. In RUP, project management is considered as core discipline whose activities are carried in all phases during development of software products. On other side service monitoring is considered as best practice of SOA which leads to availability, auditing, debugging and tracing process. In this paper, authors define a strategy to incorporate the service monitoring of SOA into RUP to improve the artifacts of project management activities. Moreover, the authors define the rules to implement the features of service monitoring, which help the project manager to carry on activities in well define manner. Proposed frame work is implemented on RB (Resuming Bank) application and obtained improved results on PM (Project Management) work. Index Terms—RUP, SOA, Service Monitoring, Availability, auditing, tracing, Project Management NTRODUCTION 1. I 2. RATIONAL UNIFIED PROCESS (RUP) Software projects which are developed through RUP RUP is a software engineering process model, which provides process model are solution oriented and object a disciplined approach to assigning tasks and responsibilities oriented. It provides a disciplined approach to within a development environment.
  • Descriptive Approach to Software Development Life Cycle Models

    Descriptive Approach to Software Development Life Cycle Models

    7797 Shaveta Gupta et al./ Elixir Comp. Sci. & Engg. 45 (2012) 7797-7800 Available online at www.elixirpublishers.com (Elixir International Journal) Computer Science and Engineering Elixir Comp. Sci. & Engg. 45 (2012) 7797-7800 Descriptive approach to software development life cycle models Shaveta Gupta and Sanjana Taya Department of Computer Science and Applications, Seth Jai Parkash Mukand Lal Institute of Engineering & Technology, Radaur, Distt. Yamunanagar (135001), Haryana, India. ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Article history: The concept of system lifecycle models came into existence that emphasized on the need to Received: 24 January 2012; follow some structured approach towards building new or improved system. Many models Received in revised form: were suggested like waterfall, prototype, rapid application development, V-shaped, top & 17 March 2012; Bottom model etc. In this paper, we approach towards the traditional as well as recent Accepted: 6 April 2012; software development life cycle models. © 2012 Elixir All rights reserved. Keywords Software Development Life Cycle, Phases and Software Development, Life Cycle Models, Traditional Models, Recent Models. Introduction Software Development Life Cycle Models The Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC) is the entire Software Development Life Cycle Model is an abstract process of formal, logical steps taken to develop a software representation of a development process. SDLC models can be product. Within the broader context of Application Lifecycle categorized as: Management (ALM), the SDLC
  • Sysml Distilled: a Brief Guide to the Systems Modeling Language

    Sysml Distilled: a Brief Guide to the Systems Modeling Language

    ptg11539604 Praise for SysML Distilled “In keeping with the outstanding tradition of Addison-Wesley’s techni- cal publications, Lenny Delligatti’s SysML Distilled does not disappoint. Lenny has done a masterful job of capturing the spirit of OMG SysML as a practical, standards-based modeling language to help systems engi- neers address growing system complexity. This book is loaded with matter-of-fact insights, starting with basic MBSE concepts to distin- guishing the subtle differences between use cases and scenarios to illu- mination on namespaces and SysML packages, and even speaks to some of the more esoteric SysML semantics such as token flows.” — Jeff Estefan, Principal Engineer, NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory “The power of a modeling language, such as SysML, is that it facilitates communication not only within systems engineering but across disci- plines and across the development life cycle. Many languages have the ptg11539604 potential to increase communication, but without an effective guide, they can fall short of that objective. In SysML Distilled, Lenny Delligatti combines just the right amount of technology with a common-sense approach to utilizing SysML toward achieving that communication. Having worked in systems and software engineering across many do- mains for the last 30 years, and having taught computer languages, UML, and SysML to many organizations and within the college setting, I find Lenny’s book an invaluable resource. He presents the concepts clearly and provides useful and pragmatic examples to get you off the ground quickly and enables you to be an effective modeler.” — Thomas W. Fargnoli, Lead Member of the Engineering Staff, Lockheed Martin “This book provides an excellent introduction to SysML.
  • Component Diagrams

    Component Diagrams

    1.COMPONENT DIAGRAMS 2. PACKAGE DIAGRAMS What is a component? – A component is an autonomous unit within a system – UML component diagrams enable to model the high-level software components, and the interfaces to those components – Important for component-based development (CBD) – Component and subsystems can be flexibly REUSED and REPLACED – UML components diagrams are Implementation diagrams i.e., it describe the different elements required for implementing a system Example – When you build a house, you must do more than create blueprints – you've got to turn your floor plans and elevation drawings into real walls, floors, and ceilings made of wood, stone, or metal. – If you are renovating a house, you'll reuse even larger components, such as whole rooms and frameworks. – Same is the case when we develop software…. COMPONENT NOTATION – A component is shown as a rectangle with – A keyword <<component>> – Optionally, in the right hand corner a component icon can be displayed – A component icon is a rectangle with two smaller rectangles jutting out from the left-hand side – This symbol is a visual stereotype – The component name Component types Components in UML could represent – logical components (e.g., business components, process components) – physical components (e.g., EJB components, COM+ and .NET components) Component ELEMENTS – A component can have – Interfaces An interface represents a declaration of a set of operations – Usage dependencies A usage dependency is relationship which one element requires another element for its full
  • Reflections on Software Architecture Linda Northrop SEI Fellow

    Reflections on Software Architecture Linda Northrop SEI Fellow

    Reflections on Software Architecture Linda Northrop SEI Fellow Software Engineering Institute Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, PA 15213 © 2016 Carnegie Mellon University Distribution Statement A: Approved for Public Release; Distribution is Unlimited Notices Copyright 2016 Carnegie Mellon University This material is based upon work funded and supported by the Department of Defense under Contract No. FA8721-05-C-0003 with Carnegie Mellon University for the operation of the Software Engineering Institute, a federally funded research and development center. Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Department of Defense. NO WARRANTY. THIS CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY AND SOFTWARE ENGINEERING INSTITUTE MATERIAL IS FURNISHED ON AN “AS-IS” BASIS. CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY MAKES NO WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, AS TO ANY MATTER INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, WARRANTY OF FITNESS FOR PURPOSE OR MERCHANTABILITY, EXCLUSIVITY, OR RESULTS OBTAINED FROM USE OF THE MATERIAL. CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY DOES NOT MAKE ANY WARRANTY OF ANY KIND WITH RESPECT TO FREEDOM FROM PATENT, TRADEMARK, OR COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT. [Distribution Statement A] This material has been approved for public release and unlimited distribution. Please see Copyright notice for non-US Government use and distribution. This material may be reproduced in its entirety, without modification, and freely distributed in written or electronic form without requesting formal permission. Permission is required for any other use. Requests for permission should be directed to the Software Engineering Institute at [email protected]. Carnegie Mellon® and CERT® are registered marks of Carnegie Mellon University.
  • Ovum Decision Matrix: Selecting an Application Lifecycle Management and Devops Solution, 2019–20

    Ovum Decision Matrix: Selecting an Application Lifecycle Management and Devops Solution, 2019–20

    Ovum Decision Matrix: Selecting an Application Lifecycle Management and DevOps Solution, 2019–20 Publication Date: 27 Jun 2019 | Product code: INT003-000374 Michael Azoff Ovum Decision Matrix: Selecting an Application Lifecycle Management and DevOps Solution, 2019–20 Summary Catalyst Software lifecycle management (SLM) is the management of software development by taking a lifecycle approach from concept through the management of requirements, testing, coding, deployment, upgrades, maintenance, and final retirement. The market provides tools to support this lifecycle in the form of application lifecycle management (ALM) tools and, with the rise of DevOps, tools that provide DevOps-style release management, orchestration, and automation. This Ovum Decision Matrix (ODM) examines ALM tools that cross over into DevOps to support the full arc of the lifecycle from application/product concept to deployment into production. Ovum view ALM origins and trends The need for taking an SLM approach is best thought of as good practice in the relatively young art of software development. The ALM tools market has evolved to support SLM through the years; at its core is the development methodology or work process, and this has evolved over time, starting with waterfall or linear stage-gate processes and incorporating various innovations such as Tom Gilb's evolutionary delivery, Barry Boehm's spiral model, and Rational's unified process, before Agile and lean swept the board with examples such as Scrum, extreme programming, and Kanban boards post- 2001 (when the Agile Manifesto was created). The integrated ALM suite tools market really took off around 2003 but supported waterfall because Agile was still under the radar.