DOCSLIB.ORG

Preparing for Change – Establishing a Domain Name Strategy for the Gtld Regime

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Preparing for Change – Establishing a Domain Name Strategy for the Gtld Regime Feature By Bruce Tonkin Preparing for change – establishing a domain name strategy for the gTLD regime Changes to the domain space have prompted • the growth in personalization of services – the more speculation about the potential threat to brand personalized the service, the more loyal the customer, which owners, yet many have still to review their domain means that brands need to use languages and language sc ripts name strategies to reflect the new online landscape. that meet the personal preference of customers. So where should they begin? The growth in the number of users of the Internet, and the number of businesses using the Internet to sell to and communicate with those users, means that online branding at every opportunity will take on increasing importance. This year marks the 25th anniversary of ‘.com’. Dramatic changes have taken place across the Internet in the past quarter of a cen tury Start with a list and, rather than heading into maturity, it is still undergoing a rapid The approach of registering major brands at the second level of all evolution. What this means for IP managers and owners of domains gTLDs and ccTLDs is not sustainable as more TLDs are in troduced, is that their domain name management strategy must evolve as well and is usually unnecessary for the majority of brands. The starting – not just with changes at the top level of the hierarchical domain point for developing a domain name management policy is name system (DNS), but also with underlying changes in how therefore a written brand strategy that sets out the major brands for consumers access and respond to information. a company and how these brands should be used. However, at While brand owners are being urged to prepare for the present, many organizations lack written policies outlining the forthcoming changes, for many the difficulty lies in identifying the domain names that should be registered for their core com pany industry changes that will drive domain name strategies going brands and the names that should be registered for short-term forward, and how to implement a strategy now which is flexible marketing initiatives. enough to take future changes into account. A sound domain name management policy will consider the The evolution of the DNS, with increased numbers of generic strategic registration of select keyword domains and common top-level domains (gTLDs) and country-code top-level domains misspellings of the key brand names in a major domain name space (ccTLDs) – as outlined in the box on page 85 – has occurred such as ‘.com’, and no registrations at all in a very focused domain alongside the proliferation of users and devices that connect to the name space with tight registration rules such as ‘.aero’. Internet at an incredible pace. These global trends are also h aving a A key element of the policy should be the measuremen t of user direct impact on domain name management strategies and include: traffic and behaviour for existing domain names in a portfolio , • the growth in mobility of people and the a vailability of which can be used to determine which names are no longer needed broadband wireless bandwidth in most major cities, which and which other names should be registered based on estima tes of means that users are more likely to access the Internet with potential traffic. small mobile devices; • the growth in the number of online channels to market for Why diversify? goods and services – including the connectivity of televisions Many companies have adopted the use of one pr imary domain and gaming consoles to the Internet – which means that brands name, which is optimized for access by search engines. This name is need to advertise and be present in many different online usually a major gTLD (eg, .’com’ or ‘.org’), or a major ccTLD (which forums; tends to be used where a company predominantly provides its • the growth in social networking – including in the over-35 services within a particular country). All content is then generally demographic – which means that brands need to be able to managed as sub-directories within the website referenced by the engage in such forums to interact with their customers; primary domain name. All other domain name registra tions tend to • the growth in the middle class (that are purchasing goods and be registered for brand protection purposes and are sim ply services online) in countries such as India and China, which redirected to the primary website, and not directly used in any means that brands must target their messages for different online or offline marketing. customer needs to exploit the growth; and This works quite well where most users access content via a www.WorldTrademarkReview.com August/September 2010 World Trademark Review 83 Feature: Preparing for change – establishing a domain name strategy for the gTLD regime There has been concern that additional top-level domain names will substantially increase the risk associated with online brand protection. However, the facts don’t support this. The risk for a particular TLD is related to both its popularity among registrants and users, and the cost and ease of registering in the namespace search engine and are referred to the w eb page that is most relevant Getting defensive to the user. However, if the results show a long domain string typical In addition to the registration of domain names for direct of a sub-directory within a website, it can deter users. A significant commercial benefit through proactive use of the names in online number of users scan the domain name displa yed in search results and offline advertising, organizations need to assess their strategy for to decide whether they trust the result enough to click through to deciding which domain names should be proactively registered to the relevant website. reduce risks to a brand and what steps should be taken to monitor A primary brand strategy can also limit marketing effectiveness. registration and use of related domain names by third parties. Providing an easy-to-remember domain name to access directl y the It is well known that domain names are misused by parties th at desired content without having to navigate through a complex seek to trade off the brands and repu tations of well-known primary website to find the content is a key consideration, especially organizations – either through malicious approaches such as for offline advertising purposes. This is what has essentially driven phishing and malware or through earning money from pay-per-click the popularity and market price of generic domain names. advertising that is related to the organization (including advertising Examples of how domain names can be used in differen t forums competitor products). However, there are also many legitimate uses include the following (these are simply examples and do not of domain names by third parties that relate to the brands of indicate the plans of any companies mentioned below): organizations. • Media-specific names such as ‘bmw.tv’ suit consumers that like Whereas a domain name is globally unique, company names and to view videos of cars as part of their decision-making process trademarks are not. The same trademark or organiza tion name may and also suit access from mobile devices where a short, simple be registered to different organizations operating in different name is easier to remember and enter into the device. categories of business or different countries. So while gTLD and • Abbreviated names for use in social media interactions such as ‘t.co’ ccTLD managers have been progressively improving protection suit use in services such as Twitter or text messages, where only a against misuse of domain names – through processes for dealing limited number of characters are available within a message. with phishing and malware, and dispute resolution processes for • Geographic-specific names such as ‘coca-cola.com.cn’ allow trademark disputes – there is nothing stopping legitimate use of delivery of content that is relevant to users in that area, domain names that may match an organization’s brand. displayed in the local language. There has thus been concern that additional top-level domain • Language-specific names such as ‘ .com’ (‘xn--zfvo28e.com’ – names will substantially increase the risk associated with online translated as ‘travel.com’ in Chinese) are also available, although brand protection. However, the facts don’t support this. The risk for a few major brands currently use domain names in particular TLD is related to both its popularity among registrants and internationalized formats. internet users and the cost and ease of register ing in the namespace. • Category-specific names can provide additional information Since the introduction of new gTLDs in 2000, data shows that about a company’s activities – for example, ‘<motor-company- most of the risks (and related domain name disputes) still occur in name>.sport’ could highlight a motor company’s involvement in the pre-existing domain name spaces – ‘.com’ is both the most motor sport, while ‘<company-name>.charity’ could provide popular domain name space and the easiest to register in, posing the information on how the company provides support for charities greatest risk from a brand protection point of view. Many of the new (something that would generally be difficult to find from a gTLDs have not achieved widespread recognition, so users are far less primary company website or by using a search engine). likely to click through to an unfamiliar domain name type. • Brand-specific names such as ‘drink.<drink-brand>’, ‘diet.<drink- In addition, some of the new gTLDs have more restrictive brand>’, ‘<car-brand>.<carcompany>’, ‘testdrive.<car-brand>’ and registration processes (eg, ‘.travel’ or ‘.museum’), which discourage ‘stayat.<hotel-chain>’ allow memorable use in offline advertising misuse.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Privacy Policy V1.1
    CENTRALNIC LTD REGISTRY PRIVACY POLICY Version 1.1 September 2018 CentralNic Ltd 35-39 Moorgate London EC2R 6AR Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ......................................................................................................................... 2 AMENDMENT ISSUE SHEET ................................................................................................................. 3 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................ 4 DATA PROTECTION RIGHTS ................................................................................................................. 5 RELATIONSHIP WITH REGISTRARS ......................................................................................................... 6 WHAT INFORMATION CENTRALNIC COLLECTS .......................................................................................... 6 INFORMATION CENTRALNIC DOES NOT COLLECT ....................................................................................... 8 HOW INFORMATION IS STORED ............................................................................................................ 8 HOW WE USE INFORMATION ............................................................................................................... 8 HOW INFORMATION IS PROTECTED ..................................................................................................... 13 HOW INFORMATION IS DELETED ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Web Portal User Manual For
    Web Portal User Manual for ©Copyright 2009 Afilias Limited Afilias Managed DNS – Web Portal User Manual Contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 About Afilias Managed DNS Service ........................................................................ 1 1.2 Afilias Managed DNS Service Website Help ............................................................. 1 1.3 Support .................................................................................................................. 2 2. DNS Portal Login Screen ............................................................................................... 4 3. MyAccount Screen ....................................................................................................... 5 3.1 Users & Groups ...................................................................................................... 5 3.1.1 User Details Tab ...................................................................................................... 6 3.1.2 User Password Tab .................................................................................................. 7 3.1.3 Users Tab ................................................................................................................. 8 3.1.4 Groups Tab .............................................................................................................. 9 3.2 Add User ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • ICANN Registry Request Service
    ICANN Registry Request Service Ticket ID: X8T8C-0S4B2 Registry Name: Public Interest Registry gTLD: .org Status: ICANN Review Status Date: 2013-06-04 22:05:48 Print Date: 2013-06-04 22:06:10 Proposed Service Name of Proposed Service: Technical description of Proposed Service: Technical Description of Proposed Service: Background: BTAPPA will be beneficial in situations where one ICANN-accredited registrar purchases (the "Gaining Registrar"), by means of a stock or asset purchase, merger or similar transaction, a portion, but not all, of another ICANN accredited registrar's domain name portfolio ("Losing Registrar") in the .ORG top-level domains ("TLDs") or where a Gaining Registrar receives a request from a registrant to transfer a significant number of its domain names from a Losing Registrar to such Gaining Registrar. Unless an entire portfolio of domain names is being transferred, Gaining Registrars must request that each domain name be transferred individually. Gaining Registrars must meet the following requirements: oGaining Registrar must be ICANN accredited for the .ORG TLD. oGaining Registrar must be in good standing and be under a Registry-Registrar Agreement with PIR. oGaining Registrar must provide PIR with evidence (i.e., affidavit, sale documents) that sets forth the transfer date or, if an acquisition, the target closing date. oIf domain names are to be transferred from multiple Losing Registrars, then they must be Registrar Affiliates. A Registrar Affiliate is a registrar entity that controls, is controlled by or is under common control with, another the Losing Registrar. oTransfers of domain names to multiple Gaining Registrars will not be permitted, regardless of familiar relationship.
    [Show full text]
  • Afilias Limited Request 28 January 2020
    Registry Services Evaluation Policy (RSEP) Request January 17, 2020 Registry Operator Afilias Limited Request Details Case Number: 00941695 This Registry Services Evaluation Policy (RSEP) request form should be submitted for review by ICANN org when a registry operator is adding, modifying, or removing a Registry Service for a TLD or group of TLDs. The RSEP Process webpage provides additional information about the process and lists RSEP requests that have been reviewed and/or approved by ICANN org. If you are proposing a service that was previously approved, we encourage you to respond similarly to the most recently approved request(s) to facilitate ICANN org’s review. Certain known Registry Services are identified in the Naming Services portal (NSp) case type list under “RSEP Fast Track” (example: “RSEP Fast Track – BTAPPA”). If you would like to submit a request for one of these services, please exit this case and select the specific Fast Track case type. Unless the service is identified under RSEP Fast Track, all other RSEP requests should be submitted through this form. Helpful Tips • Click the “Save” button to save your work. This will allow you to return to the request at a later time and will not submit the request. • You may print or save your request as a PDF by clicking the printer icon in the upper right corner. You must click “Save” at least once in order to print the request. • Click the “Submit” button to submit your completed request to ICANN org. • Complete the information requested below. All fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required.
    [Show full text]
  • Beginner's Guide to Domain Names
    Beginner’s Guide to D O M A I N N A M E S THIS IS ONE OF A SERIES OF GUIDES ABOUT ISSUES OF IMPORTANCE TO INTERNET USERS. EDUCATING NEW USERS ABOUT INTERNET ISSUES IS PART OF ICANN’S MISSION TO ENSURE A STABLE, SECURE, GLOBALLY INTEROPERABLE INTERNET. ICANN PREPARED THIS GUIDE AT THE REQUEST OF THE AT-LARGE ADVISORY COMMITTEE, THE VOICE OF THE INDIVIDUAL INTERNET USER AT ICANN. WE SINCERELY HOPE YOU FIND IT HELPFUL. TA b l E O f C ontents Introduction.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................2 Domain Names...........................................................................................................................................................................................................................3 1 What.is.a.domain.name.and.how.does.it.work?...........................................................................................................................................3 2 ...How.do.I.register.a.domain.name?.......................................................................................................................................................................3 . 3 ...How.do.I.select.a.domain.name.to.register?..................................................................................................................................................4 4 What.is.a.registrar.and.how.do.I.select.one?...................................................................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • The Insider's Guide to Domain Transfers
    The Insider’s Guide to Domain Transfers The image below illustrates the flow of a domain transfer, including the actions taken by each of the parties involved. Please note that all confirmation emails are sent to the Administrative Contact email address listed for the domain. Common Problems with Domain Transfers • The Gaining Registrar did not receive a response from the Administrative (Admin) Contact within 30 days or the Admin email address is no longer valid (see the example confirmation email on page 3). • For .org, .info, .us, and .biz domains, the customer did not obtain an Authorization Code (Auth Code) for the transfer from the Losing Registrar and enter it in the transfer confirmation page (for information on obtaining an Authorization Code see page 2). • The domain name is locked, expired, or was registered or renewed within the last 60 days. • The Losing Registrar did not receive a response to the transfer confirmation email within their allotted timeframe. 2 Registrar Contact Information The table below lists the contact information for the most common Registrars and describes how to obtain a transfer Authorization Code from each for .org, .info, .us, and .biz domain names. Registrar To obtain an Auth Code (.org, .info, .us, .biz) Contact Info Transfer Approval Network Call 24 hour support and request Auth Code and (888) 642-9675 24/7 Confirmation Email sent to Solutions they will send to ‘Admin’ contact on domain. the primary contact on record to approve transfer. Register.com Within Account Management click on a Domain (800) 899-0724 24/7 Link within the email Name to view its details.
    [Show full text]
  • ("Agreement"), Is Between Tucows Domains Inc
    MASTER DOMAIN REGISTRATION AGREEMENT THIS REGISTRATION AGREEMENT ("Agreement"), is between Tucows Domains Inc. ("Tucows") and you, on behalf of yourself or the entity you represent ("Registrant"), as offered through the Reseller participating in Tucows' distribution channel for domain name registrations. Any reference to "Registry" or "Registry Operator" shall refer to the registry administrator of the applicable top-level domain ("TLD"). This Agreement explains Tucows' obligations to Registrant, and Registrant's obligations to Tucows, for the domain registration services. By agreeing to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement, Registrant agrees to be bound by the rules and regulations set forth in this Agreement, and by a registry for that particular TLD. DOMAIN NAME REGISTRATION. Domain name registrations are for a limited term, which ends on the expiration date communicated to the Registrant. A domain name submitted through Tucows will be deemed active when the relevant registry accepts the Registrant's application and activates Registrant's domain name registration or renewal. Tucows cannot guarantee that Registrant will obtain a desired domain name, even if an inquiry indicates that a domain name is available at the time of application. Tucows is not responsible for any inaccuracies or errors in the domain name registration or renewal process. FEES. Registrant agrees to pay Reseller the applicable service fees prior to the registration or renewal of a domain. All fees payable here under are non-refundable even if Registrant's domain name registration is suspended, cancelled or transferred prior to the end of your current registration term. TERM. This Agreement will remain in effect during the term of the domain name registration as selected, recorded and paid for at the time of registration or renewal.
    [Show full text]
  • Unclassified OCDE/GD(97)207
    Unclassified OCDE/GD(97)207 INTERNET DOMAIN NAMES: ALLOCATION POLICIES ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT Paris 60465 Document complet disponible sur OLIS dans son format d'origine Complete document available on OLIS in its original format Copyright OECD, 1997 Applications for permission to reproduce or translate all or part of this material should be made to: Head of Publications Services, OECD, 2 rue André-Pascal, 75775 Paris Cedex 16, France 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD.................................................................................................................................................. 5 MAIN POINTS............................................................................................................................................... 6 INTERNET GROWTH AND THE DOMAIN NAME SYSTEM................................................................. 8 DOMAIN NAME SYSTEM OPERATIONS IN OECD COUNTRIES...................................................... 16 The Administration of Top Level Domains and Market Structure .......................................................... 17 The Administration of Generic Top Level Domains and Market Structure ............................................. 18 POLICY COMPARISON BETWEEN DOMAIN REGISTRARS.............................................................. 29 Location Requirements ............................................................................................................................. 29 Application Limits ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Internet Has 366.3 Million Domain Name Registrations at the End of the Fourth Quarter of 2020
    Internet Has 366.3 Million Domain Name Registrations at the End of the Fourth Quarter of 2020 March 4, 2021 RESTON, Va.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Mar. 4, 2021-- VeriSign, Inc. (NASDAQ: VRSN), a global provider of domain name registry services and internet infrastructure, today announced that the fourth quarter of 2020 closed with 366.3 million domain name registrations across all top-level domains (TLDs), a decrease of 4.4 million domain name registrations, or 1.2 percent, compared to the third quarter of 2020.1,2 Domain name registrations have grown by 4.0 million, or 1.1 percent, year over year.1,2 The .com and .net TLDs had a combined total of 165.2 million domain name registrations in the domain name base3 at the end of the fourth quarter of 2020, an increase of 1.5 million domain name registrations, or 0.9 percent, compared to the third quarter of 2020. The .com and .net TLDs had a combined increase of 6.3 million domain name registrations, or 4.0 percent, year over year. As of Dec. 31, 2020, the .com domain name base totaled 151.8 million domain name registrations, and the .net domain name base totaled 13.4 million domain name registrations. New .com and .net domain name registrations totaled 10.5 million at the end of the fourth quarter of 2020, compared to 10.3 million domain name registrations at the end of the fourth quarter of 2019. Verisign publishes the Domain Name Industry Brief to provide internet users throughout the world with statistical and analytical research and data on the domain name industry.
    [Show full text]
  • Rights Or Legitimate Interests WIPO Advanced Workshop Domain Name
    Quick Guide to WIPO Domain Name Dispute Resolution Services for the .MX ccTLD WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center Gonzalo Bleda Navarro Maria de Lourdes Aguirre Geneva October 8, 2020 2 In this webinar: Registry. MX and recent updates on the .MX Reglamento The main characteristics of .MX proceedings as compared to the UDRP Basics points on how to file a .MX domain name complaint against a “cybersquatter” The main benefits of filing a case with WIPO in comparison to court litigation 3 After this webinar, you can: Send us your follow-up questions Download this presentation Download handouts Receive a recording of the webinar 4 WIPO’s ccTLD Program Advice to ccTLD operators: - Registration Agreement; - Dispute resolution policies; - IP protection mechanisms WIPO Center’s Role: - International standards of IP protection - Case administration of IP-related domain name disputes at no cost to the ccTLD operator (“cybersquatting”) https://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_pub_1069.pdf 5 WIPO and ccTLDs of the region 6 Distribution of cases per year in .MX Number of cases .MX: 435 45 42 40 39 36 36 36 35 35 32 30 26 24 25 23 20 20 17 16 15 15 13 10 9 6 6 5 4 0 2001 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 7 Distribution of complainants in .MX proceedings COMPLAINANT'S COUNTRY IN .MX Other 8% SE 3% DE 3% MX ES 43% 3% FR 4% US 28% MX US FR ES DE CH IT LU SE GB Other 8 Distribution of respondents in .MX proceedings RESPONDENT'S COUNTRY CN 5% US 19% MX 67% MX US CN AR PY ES DE CA GB PA Others 9 Registry
    [Show full text]
  • Registry Privacy Statement
    Registry Privacy Statement INTRODUCTION About Afilias provides reliable, secure management of Internet top-level domains. As the registry operator for top-level domains (TLDs), Afilias maintains the responsibility for the operation of each TLD, including maintaining a registry of the domain names within each TLD. In connection with generic top-level domains (gTLDs), Afilias serves as the registry operator for these gTLDs under contracts with the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN), a not-for-profit private sector organization that is charged with coordinating and ensuring the stable and secure operation of the Internet’s unique identifier systems (https://www.icann.org). ​ ​ In connection with country-code top-level domains (ccTLDs), Afilias has entered into separate legal arrangement with the ccTLD managers for the provision of these services. Afilias is made up of Afilias Limited and its subsidiaries: Afilias Technologies Limited, Monolith Registry, LLC, and other registry operators (the “Afilias Group”). This privacy notice is issued on behalf of the Afilias Group so when we mention “Afilias”, “we”, “us” or “our”, we are referring to the relevant company in the Afilias Group responsible for your data. General Afilias is committed to processing your personal data in a fair and lawful manner. This Privacy Statement aims to provide information about Afilias’ collection and processing of personal data. Scope This Privacy Statement relates to our domain name registry system only. It is intended to outline the information we collect, how it is stored, used, shared, and protected, and your choices regarding use, access, and correction of your information. It is important that you read this Privacy Statement together with any other privacy policy or fair processing notice we may provide on specific occasions when we are collecting or processing personal data.
    [Show full text]
  • Which Internet Registries Offer the Best Protection for Domain Owners?
    Which Internet registries offer the best protection for domain owners? Jeremy Malcolm, Senior Global Policy Analyst, EFF Gus Rossi, Global Policy Director, Public Knowledge Mitch Stoltz, Senior Staff Attorney, EFF July 27, 2017 ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE 1 In the Internet’s early days, those wishing to register their own domain name had only a few choices of top-level domain to choose from, such as .com, .net, or .org. Today, users, innovators, and companies can get creative and choose from more than a thousand top-level domains, such as .cool, .deals, and .fun. But should they? It turns out that not every top-level domain is created equal when it comes to protecting the domain holder’s rights. Depending on where you register your domain, a rival, troll, or officious regulator who doesn’t like what you’re doing with it could wrongly take it away, or could unmask your identity as its owner—even if they are from overseas. To help make it easier to sort the .best top-level domains from the .rest, EFF and Public Knowledge have gotten together to provide this guide to inform you about your choices. There’s no one best choice, since not every domain faces the same challenges. But with the right information in hand, you’ll be able to make the choice that makes sense for you. Before proceeding it’s worth noting the difference between a registry and a registrar. The domain registry is like a wholesaler, who operates an entire top-level domain (TLD) such as .com.
    [Show full text]