Saccharum, Sorghum, Solenopsis, Spiders, Araneae)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Saccharum, Sorghum, Solenopsis, Spiders, Araneae) Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1985 Influence of Vegetation Manipulation and Selected Cultural Practices on Predation in Louisiana Sugarcane Ecosystems (Saccharum, Sorghum, Solenopsis, Spiders, Araneae). Ahmed Daoud Ali Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Ali, Ahmed Daoud, "Influence of Vegetation Manipulation and Selected Cultural Practices on Predation in Louisiana Sugarcane Ecosystems (Saccharum, Sorghum, Solenopsis, Spiders, Araneae)." (1985). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 4114. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/4114 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This reproduction was made from a copy of a manuscript sent to us for publication and microfilming. While the most advanced technology has been used to pho­ tograph and reproduce this manuscript, the quality of the reproduction is heavily dependent upon the quality of the material submitted. Pages in any manuscript may have indistinct print. In till cases the best available copy has been filmed. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help clarify notations which may appear on this reproduction. 1. Manuscripts may not always be complete. When it is not possible to obtain missing pages, a note appears to indicate this. 2. When copyrighted materials are removed from the manuscript, a note ap­ pears to indicate this. 3. Oversize materials (maps, drawings, and charts) are photographed by sec­ tioning the original, beginning at the upper left hand comer and continu­ ing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each oversize page is also filmed as one exposure and is available, for an additional charge, as a standard 35mm slide or in black and white paper format.* 4. Most photographs reproduce acceptably on positive microfilm or micro­ fiche but lack clarity on xerographic copies made from the microfilm. For an additional charge, all photographs are available in black and white standard 35mm slide format.* *For more information about black and white slides or enlarged paper reproductions, please contact the Dissertations Customer Services Department. ~ r ‘ IM v e rs ity M icrofilm s ME . International 8610624 Ati, Ahmed Daoud INFLUENCE OF VEGETATION MANIPULATION AND SELECTED CULTURAL PRACTICES ON PREDATION IN LOUISIANA SUGARCANE ECOSYSTEMS The Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical Col. Ph.D. 1985 University Microfilms International 300 N. Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, Ml 48106 PLEASE NOTE: In all cases this material has been filmed in the best possible way from the available copy. Problems encountered with this document have been identified here with a check mark V . 1. Glossy photographs or pages ______ 2. Colored illustrations, paper or print _______ 3. Photographs with dark background _____ 4. Illustrations are poor copy _____ 5. Pages with black marks, not original copy ______ 6. Print shows through as there is text on both sides of p a g e _______ 7. Indistinct, broken or small print on several pages 8. Print exceeds margin requirements ______ 9. Tightly bound copy with print lost in spine_______ 10. Computer printout pages with indistinct print _______ 11. Page(s) _________lacking when material received, and not available from school or author. 12. Page(s) _______seem to be missing in numbering only as text follows. 13. Two pages num bered . Text follows. 14. Curling and wrinkled pages ____ 15. Dissertation contains pages with print at a slant, filmed as received ________ 16. Other _____________________________________________________________________________ University Microfilms International INFLUENCE OF VEGETATION MANIPULATION AND SELECTED CULTURAL PRACTICES ON PREDATION IN LOUISIANA SUGARCANE ECOSYSTEMS A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Entomology by Ahmed D. Ali B.S., University of California at Davis, 1979 M.S., University of California at Davis, 1981 December 1985 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank the owners of Levert-St. John, Sugarland, and Lannaux sugarcane plantations for allowing us access to set up experimental tests on their properties. Special thanks are given to Mr. Jeff Flynn, a friend and colleague, who made a tremendous contribution to data gathering and field work in the past 4 years. My gratitude is also expressed to fellow graduate students Billy Fuller, Allan Showier, Roger Vines, and Emmanuel Ogunwolu who assisted in field operations. Thanks are given to Dr. C. D. Dondale of the Biosystematics Research Institute in Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, for identification and/or confirmation of spider specimens. Special thanks are given to Drs. G. B. Edwards of the Florida State Collection of Arthropods, Gainesville, FI., and H. W. Levi of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, Cambridge, Mass., for studying with them parts of their collections. Special thanks are given to Dr. W. H. Hudnall of the LSU Department of Agronomy for analysis of soil samples, and for constructive comments regarding one of the chapters reported herein. I would like to express my gratitude to the administrators of the College of Agriculture, especially the late Dean Prentiss E. Schilling, and the International Teaching and Research Foundation for Agricultural Sciences for providing my assistantship support. I am grateful to the members of my graduate committee, Drs. L. D. Newsom and J. B. Graves of the Department of Entomology, L. M. Kitchen of the Department of Plant Pathology and Crop Physiology, K. L. Koonce of the Department of Experimental Statistics, and L. E. Urbatsch of the Department of Botany, Louisiana State University, for their guidance and constructive comments which facilitated publishing the majority of the chapters reported herein. Special thanks are given to my major professor Dr. T. E. Reagan, a friend and trustworthy team leader, who provided much guidance and support during the past 4 years. Although his insistence on publishing my work seemed burdensome at times, in retrospect, I appreciate his wise and valuable advice for it has provided me with the competitive edge in our present academic system where "Publish or Perish" is the rule. Finally, I would like to thank my dear wife, Rebecca, for her gentle and warm moral support through the ups and downs of my graduate program. I also would like to express my thanks to my brother, Dr. Ali D. Ali, who supported me morally and financially over the past few years. And most of all I would like to express my deepest respect and sincerest appreciation to my father and mother, Drs. Daoud S. Ali and Suad K. Ismail, to whom I will be indebted forever. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS.................................................. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS................................................ iv LIST OF TABLES................................................... vi LIST OF FIGURES.................................................. ix ABSTRACT......................................................... x INTRODUCTION..................................................... 1 LITERATURE REVIEW................................................ 5 I. Vegetation manipulation and predation in Louisiana sugarcane. 5 II. Imported fire ant (IFA) foraging in sugarcane............... 5 III. Effects of cultural practices and soil types on IFA populations........... 6 IV. Spiders in Louisiana sugarcane........... „................. 7 V. Johnsongrass interference with sugarcane.................... 8 CHAPTER I. VEGETATION MANIPULATION IMPACT ON PREDATOR AND PREY POPULATIONS IN LOUISIANA SUGARCANE ECOSYSTEMS......... 9 Introduction................................................... 10 Materials and Methods.......................................... 11 Results............... 14 Discussion..................................................... 25 References Cited............................................... 28 CHAPTER II. INFLUENCE OF SELECTED WEEDY AND WEED-FREE SUGARCANE HABITATS ON DIET COMPOSITION AND FORAGING ACTIVITY OF THE IMPORTED FIRE ANT (HYMENOPTERA:FORMICIDAE) 31 Introduction.......... 32 Materials and Methods.......................................... 33 Results........................................................ 35 Discussion..................................................... 42 References Cited........................................... 46 CHAPTER III. EFFECTS OF SELECTED SOIL TYPES AND CULTURAL PRACTICES ON ABUNDANCE OF Solenopsis invicta Buren (HYMENOPTERA: FORMICIDAE) IN A PERENNIAL FIELD CROP SYSTEM......... 49 Introduction................................................... 50 Materials and Methods.......................................... 51 Results........................................................ 54 Discussion..................................................... 59 References .................................................... 64 iv Page CHAPTER IV. INFLUENCE OF SELECTED WEED CONTROL PRACTICES ON ARANEID FAUNAL COMPOSITION AND ABUNDANCE IN SUGARCANE. 66 Introduction..................................................
Recommended publications
  • The Beetle Fauna of Dominica, Lesser Antilles (Insecta: Coleoptera): Diversity and Distribution
    INSECTA MUNDI, Vol. 20, No. 3-4, September-December, 2006 165 The beetle fauna of Dominica, Lesser Antilles (Insecta: Coleoptera): Diversity and distribution Stewart B. Peck Department of Biology, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K1S 5B6, Canada stewart_peck@carleton. ca Abstract. The beetle fauna of the island of Dominica is summarized. It is presently known to contain 269 genera, and 361 species (in 42 families), of which 347 are named at a species level. Of these, 62 species are endemic to the island. The other naturally occurring species number 262, and another 23 species are of such wide distribution that they have probably been accidentally introduced and distributed, at least in part, by human activities. Undoubtedly, the actual numbers of species on Dominica are many times higher than now reported. This highlights the poor level of knowledge of the beetles of Dominica and the Lesser Antilles in general. Of the species known to occur elsewhere, the largest numbers are shared with neighboring Guadeloupe (201), and then with South America (126), Puerto Rico (113), Cuba (107), and Mexico-Central America (108). The Antillean island chain probably represents the main avenue of natural overwater dispersal via intermediate stepping-stone islands. The distributional patterns of the species shared with Dominica and elsewhere in the Caribbean suggest stages in a dynamic taxon cycle of species origin, range expansion, distribution contraction, and re-speciation. Introduction windward (eastern) side (with an average of 250 mm of rain annually). Rainfall is heavy and varies season- The islands of the West Indies are increasingly ally, with the dry season from mid-January to mid- recognized as a hotspot for species biodiversity June and the rainy season from mid-June to mid- (Myers et al.
    [Show full text]
  • A Protocol for Online Documentation of Spider Biodiversity Inventories Applied to a Mexican Tropical Wet Forest (Araneae, Araneomorphae)
    Zootaxa 4722 (3): 241–269 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) https://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2020 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4722.3.2 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:6AC6E70B-6E6A-4D46-9C8A-2260B929E471 A protocol for online documentation of spider biodiversity inventories applied to a Mexican tropical wet forest (Araneae, Araneomorphae) FERNANDO ÁLVAREZ-PADILLA1, 2, M. ANTONIO GALÁN-SÁNCHEZ1 & F. JAVIER SALGUEIRO- SEPÚLVEDA1 1Laboratorio de Aracnología, Facultad de Ciencias, Departamento de Biología Comparada, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Circuito Exterior s/n, Colonia Copilco el Bajo. C. P. 04510. Del. Coyoacán, Ciudad de México, México. E-mail: [email protected] 2Corresponding author Abstract Spider community inventories have relatively well-established standardized collecting protocols. Such protocols set rules for the orderly acquisition of samples to estimate community parameters and to establish comparisons between areas. These methods have been tested worldwide, providing useful data for inventory planning and optimal sampling allocation efforts. The taxonomic counterpart of biodiversity inventories has received considerably less attention. Species lists and their relative abundances are the only link between the community parameters resulting from a biotic inventory and the biology of the species that live there. However, this connection is lost or speculative at best for species only partially identified (e. g., to genus but not to species). This link is particularly important for diverse tropical regions were many taxa are undescribed or little known such as spiders. One approach to this problem has been the development of biodiversity inventory websites that document the morphology of the species with digital images organized as standard views.
    [Show full text]
  • Arthropods of Elm Fork Preserve
    Arthropods of Elm Fork Preserve Arthropods are characterized by having jointed limbs and exoskeletons. They include a diverse assortment of creatures: Insects, spiders, crustaceans (crayfish, crabs, pill bugs), centipedes and millipedes among others. Column Headings Scientific Name: The phenomenal diversity of arthropods, creates numerous difficulties in the determination of species. Positive identification is often achieved only by specialists using obscure monographs to ‘key out’ a species by examining microscopic differences in anatomy. For our purposes in this survey of the fauna, classification at a lower level of resolution still yields valuable information. For instance, knowing that ant lions belong to the Family, Myrmeleontidae, allows us to quickly look them up on the Internet and be confident we are not being fooled by a common name that may also apply to some other, unrelated something. With the Family name firmly in hand, we may explore the natural history of ant lions without needing to know exactly which species we are viewing. In some instances identification is only readily available at an even higher ranking such as Class. Millipedes are in the Class Diplopoda. There are many Orders (O) of millipedes and they are not easily differentiated so this entry is best left at the rank of Class. A great deal of taxonomic reorganization has been occurring lately with advances in DNA analysis pointing out underlying connections and differences that were previously unrealized. For this reason, all other rankings aside from Family, Genus and Species have been omitted from the interior of the tables since many of these ranks are in a state of flux.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Spider Genus Thymoites in the Neotropical Region (Araneae, Theridiidae): Nine New Species, Complementary Descriptions and New Records
    Zootaxa 3972 (2): 181–207 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2015 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3972.2.3 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:3C4DDBD9-6CE7-449F-B8FE-82A72A2B8A01 On the spider genus Thymoites in the Neotropical Region (Araneae, Theridiidae): nine new species, complementary descriptions and new records EVERTON NEI LOPES RODRIGUES1 & ANTONIO D. BRESCOVIT2 1Laboratório de Diversidade e Sistemática de Arachnida. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biologia, Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos. Av. Unisinos, 950, Cristo Rei, 93022-000 São Leopoldo, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. E-mail: [email protected] 2Laboratório Especial de Coleções Zoológicas, Instituto Butantan. Av. Vital Brazil, 1500, 05503-900 São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil Abstract The theridiid genus Thymoites Keyserling, 1884 is distributed worldwide. Spiders of this genus are mainly known from the Neotropical Region, but are poorly studied in Brazil. In this paper nine new species of Thymoites are described from Brazil, one from the state of Alagoas: Thymoites murici n. sp.; two from São Paulo: T. bocaina n. sp., T. ilhabela n. sp. and T. taiobeiras n. sp. from states of Minas Gerais and São Paulo; one from the state of Santa Catarina: Thymoites tab- uleiro n. sp.; and, three from state of Rio Grande do Sul: Thymoites cristal n. sp., T. camaqua n. sp. and T. piratini n. sp., all based on males and females; and one from the state of Rio de Janeiro: T. pinheiral n. sp. based on male.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 CHECKLIST of ILLINOIS SPIDERS Over 500 Spider Species Have Been
    1 CHECKLIST OF ILLINOIS SPIDERS Over 500 spider species have been reported to occur in Illinois. This checklist includes 558 species, and there may be records in the literature that have eluded the author’s attention. This checklist of Illinois species has been compiled from sources cited below. The initials in parentheses that follow each species name and authorship in the list denote the paper or other source in which the species was reported. Locality data, dates of collection, and other information about each species can be obtained by referring to the indicated sources. (AAS) American Arachnological Society Spider Species List for North America, published on the web site of the American Arachnological Society: http://americanarachnology.org/AAS_information.html (B&N) Beatty, J. A. and J. M. Nelson. 1979. Additions to the Checklist of Illinois Spiders. The Great Lakes Entomologist 12:49-56. (JB) Beatty, J. A. 2002. The Spiders of Illinois and Indiana, their Geolographical Affinities, and an Annotated Checklist. Proc. Ind. Acad. Sci. 1:77-94. (BC) Cutler, B. 1987. A Revision of the American Species of the Antlike Jumping Spider Genus Synageles (Araneae: Salticidae). J. Arachnol.15:321-348. (G&P) Gertsch, W. J. And N. I. Platnick. 1980. A Revision of the American Spiders of the Family Atypidae (Araneae, Mygalomorphae). Amer. Mus. Novitates 2704:1-39. (BK) Kaston, B. J. 1955. Check List of Illinois Spiders. Trans. Ill. State Acad. Sci. 47: 165- 172. (SK) Kendeigh, S. C. 1979. Invertebrate Populations of the Deciduous Forest Fluctuations and Relations to Weather. Illinois Biol. Monog. 50:1-107.
    [Show full text]
  • 1Department of Entomology 2Department of Entomology And
    PREDATORY BEHAVIOR OF THE BASILICA SPIDER, MECYNOGEA LEMNISCATA (ARANEAE, ARANEIDAE) BY MARIANNE B. WILLEy1 MARGARET A. JOHNSON2 AND PETER H. ADLER1 1Department of Entomology 114 Long Hall Clemson University Clemson, South Carolina 29634 2Department of Entomology and Nematology University of Florida Gainesville, Florida 32604 ABSTRACT Females of Mecynogea lemniscata (Walckenaer) are generalist predators. Sixteen behavioral acts were described for M. lemnis- cata preying on house flies, carpenter ants, and Asiatic oak wee- vils in the field and laboratory. Behavioral sequences varied with prey type, but generally began with plucking and diverged there- after. The predatory behavior of M. lemniscata is most similar to that of the higher araneids. INTRODUCTION Mecynogea lemniscata is currently placed in the Araneidae in subfamily Cyrtophorinae (Coddington, 1989), despite having many characteristics in common with linyphiids. Mecynogea has a his- tory of taxonomic uncertainty and has been placed in either the Linyphiidae or the Araneidae by various authorities. Within the Araneidae, Mecynogea has been positioned both as a primitive araneid (Kaston, 1964) and as an advanced araneid (Levi, 1980). Manuscript received 30 April 1992 153 154 Psyche [Vol. 99 Some of the past uncertainty surrounding the taxonomic place- ment of Mecynogea is because of the superficial similarity in web structure between Mecynogea and linyphiids; however, web struc- ture is not necessarily a reliable phylogenetic indicator (Levi, 1978). Exline (1948) hypothesized that dome web construction by Mecynogea and Linyphia arose independently through convergent evolution. Similarities between Cyrtophora webs and linyphiid webs also are believed to be the result of convergence (Nentwig and Heimer, 1983; Lubin, 1980), and based on behavior and morphology, Cyrtophora is similar to Araneidae (Blanke, 1972 cited in Lubin, 1980).
    [Show full text]
  • Widestrike®) Against Beet Armyworm and Fall Armyworm Larvae (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)
    Adamczyk & Gore: Activity of Cry1Ac and Cry1F Against Armyworms 427 LABORATORY AND FIELD PERFORMANCE OF COTTON CONTAINING CRY1AC, CRY1F, AND BOTH CRY1AC AND CRY1F (WIDESTRIKE®) AGAINST BEET ARMYWORM AND FALL ARMYWORM LARVAE (LEPIDOPTERA: NOCTUIDAE) J. J. ADAMCZYK, JR. AND J. GORE USDA, ARS, Southern Insect Management Research Unit, P.O. Box 346, Stoneville, MS 38776 ABSTRACT The efficacy of transgenic cotton genotypes containing Cry1Ac, Cry1F, and Cry1Ac stacked with Cry1F (WideStrike®, Dow Agrosciences, Indianapolis, IN) were investigated during 2001-2003 against the beet armyworm, Spodoptera exigua (Hübner) (=BAW), and the fall ar- myworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith) (=FAW), in laboratory bioassays and small ex- perimental field plots. In all experiments, cotton containing Cry1F was more toxic to BAW and FAW larvae compared to cotton containing only Cry1Ac. In the majority of experiments, the addition of Cry1Ac to the Cry1F genotype had no increased effect on efficacy and certain biological parameters against BAW and FAW larvae compared to cotton containing only Cry1F. Furthermore, the presence or absence of an additive, synergistic, or antagonistic ef- fect between Cry1Ac and Cry1F was not observed in these field and laboratory experiments. Key Words: cotton, Cry1 genes, transgenic cotton, beet armyworm, fall armyworm, Spodoptera spp. RESUMEN La eficacia de los genotipos de algodón transgénicos que tienen Cry1Ac, Cry1F, y Cry1Ac combinados con Cry1F (WideStrike®, Dow Agrosciences, Indianapolis, IN) fueron investiga- dos durante 2001-2003 contra del gusano trozador (BAW), Spodoptera exigua (Hübner), y el gusano cogollero (FAW), Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith), en bioensayos de laboratorio y en experimentos en parcelas pequeñas de campo.
    [Show full text]
  • A List of Utah Spiders, with Their Localities
    Great Basin Naturalist Volume 43 Number 3 Article 22 7-31-1983 A list of Utah spiders, with their localities Dorald M. Allred Brigham Young University B. J. Kaston San Diego State University, San Diego, California Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn Recommended Citation Allred, Dorald M. and Kaston, B. J. (1983) "A list of Utah spiders, with their localities," Great Basin Naturalist: Vol. 43 : No. 3 , Article 22. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn/vol43/iss3/22 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Great Basin Naturalist by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. A LIST OF UTAH SPIDERS, WITH THEIR LOCALITIES Allred' B. Kaston- Dorald M. and J. Abstract. — The 621 species of spiders known to occnr in Utah as recorded in the Hterature or Utah universities' collections are listed with their junior synonyms and collection localities. Two-fifths (265 species) are known from onlv one locality each, and only one-fifth (123 species) from five or more localities in the state. Little is known of the distribution or eco- Much of our knowledge of Utah spiders logical relationships of Utah spiders. Each of was contributed by Ralph Chamberlin, who 265 species of the 621 recorded for the State authored or coauthored the naming of 220 of is known from only one locality. Even the the species listed for Utah.
    [Show full text]
  • Butterflies of North America
    Insects of Western North America 7. Survey of Selected Arthropod Taxa of Fort Sill, Comanche County, Oklahoma. 4. Hexapoda: Selected Coleoptera and Diptera with cumulative list of Arthropoda and additional taxa Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1177 2 Insects of Western North America. 7. Survey of Selected Arthropod Taxa of Fort Sill, Comanche County, Oklahoma. 4. Hexapoda: Selected Coleoptera and Diptera with cumulative list of Arthropoda and additional taxa by Boris C. Kondratieff, Luke Myers, and Whitney S. Cranshaw C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523 August 22, 2011 Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity. Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1177 3 Cover Photo Credits: Whitney S. Cranshaw. Females of the blow fly Cochliomyia macellaria (Fab.) laying eggs on an animal carcass on Fort Sill, Oklahoma. ISBN 1084-8819 This publication and others in the series may be ordered from the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity, Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, 80523-1177. Copyrighted 2011 4 Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................................7 SUMMARY AND MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS
    [Show full text]
  • Arthropods Associated with Above-Ground Portions of the Invasive Tree, Melaleuca Quinquenervia, in South Florida, Usa
    300 Florida Entomologist 86(3) September 2003 ARTHROPODS ASSOCIATED WITH ABOVE-GROUND PORTIONS OF THE INVASIVE TREE, MELALEUCA QUINQUENERVIA, IN SOUTH FLORIDA, USA SHERYL L. COSTELLO, PAUL D. PRATT, MIN B. RAYAMAJHI AND TED D. CENTER USDA-ARS, Invasive Plant Research Laboratory, 3205 College Ave., Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33314 ABSTRACT Melaleuca quinquenervia (Cav.) S. T. Blake, the broad-leaved paperbark tree, has invaded ca. 202,000 ha in Florida, including portions of the Everglades National Park. We performed prerelease surveys in south Florida to determine if native or accidentally introduced arthro- pods exploit this invasive plant species and assess the potential for higher trophic levels to interfere with the establishment and success of future biological control agents. Herein we quantify the abundance of arthropods present on the above-ground portions of saplings and small M. quinquenervia trees at four sites. Only eight of the 328 arthropods collected were observed feeding on M. quinquenervia. Among the arthropods collected in the plants adven- tive range, 19 species are agricultural or horticultural pests. The high percentage of rare species (72.0%), presumed to be transient or merely resting on the foliage, and the paucity of species observed feeding on the weed, suggests that future biological control agents will face little if any competition from pre-existing plant-feeding arthropods. Key Words: Paperbark tree, arthropod abundance, Oxyops vitiosa, weed biological control RESUMEN Melaleuca quinquenervia (Cav.) S. T. Blake ha invadido ca. 202,000 ha en la Florida, inclu- yendo unas porciones del Parque Nacional de los Everglades. Nosotros realizamos sondeos preliminares en el sur de la Florida para determinar si los artópodos nativos o accidental- mente introducidos explotan esta especie de planta invasora y evaluar el potencial de los ni- veles tróficos superiores para interferir con el establecimento y éxito de futuros agentes de control biológico.
    [Show full text]
  • Predation of Exotic Anolis Porcatus Gray, 1840 (Squamata: Dactyloidae) by the Exotic Cyrtophora Citricola (Forskål, 1775) (Araneae: Araneidae) in Brazil
    Herpetology Notes, volume 13: 1099-1101 (2020) (published online on 28 December 2020) Caught in the alien web: predation of exotic Anolis porcatus Gray, 1840 (Squamata: Dactyloidae) by the exotic Cyrtophora citricola (Forskål, 1775) (Araneae: Araneidae) in Brazil Karla L. R. Antonio1, Guilherme Sichieri1,2, Pedro Henrique A. G. Moura1,2, Ricardo R. Samelo3, Fabiana R. Costa4, and Ivan Nunes1,* The Cuban green anole, Anolis porcatus Gray, 1840 including Brazil (Álvares and De Maria, 2004; Martins (Squamata: Dactyloidae) (Fig. 1A), is an exotic lizard in and Santos, 2018). Spiders of this genus are mainly Brazil and it belongs to the Anolis carolinensis species distributed in Asia, subtropical Africa and Australian group (Rodríguez-Schettino, 1999; Prates et al., 2016). region (World Spider Catalog, 2020). They build The species is well adapted to urbanised and highly specialised non-sticky webs to catch their prey, which anthropised environments where it can be found in street are typically comprised by flying insects that get trapped lampposts, fences, shrubs, trees and lawns (Prates et al., on the dense mesh (Levi, 1997) and can be restrained 2016). Their individuals are mainly insectivores, but by direct biting or immobilisation wrapping (Lubin, occasionally feed on plant material or small vertebrates 1980). A well-marked characteristic of webs built by (Rodríguez-Schettino, 1999). These characteristics Cyrtophora spiders are their strength and endurance, enable this species to be easily introduced in other which would be an adaptation to withstand strong winds areas, including the Baixada Santista region at the and rainfall in open habitats (Lubin, 1973). Southeastern coast of Brazil where it has been recently On 05 May 2017, around 11:00 h, we observed a reported (Samelo and Barrela, 2016) in an ever-growing predation event on Anolis porcatus by Cyrtophora number (IN, unpublished data).
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny of the Orb‐Weaving Spider
    Cladistics Cladistics (2019) 1–21 10.1111/cla.12382 Phylogeny of the orb-weaving spider family Araneidae (Araneae: Araneoidea) Nikolaj Scharffa,b*, Jonathan A. Coddingtonb, Todd A. Blackledgec, Ingi Agnarssonb,d, Volker W. Framenaue,f,g, Tamas Szuts} a,h, Cheryl Y. Hayashii and Dimitar Dimitrova,j,k aCenter for Macroecology, Evolution and Climate, Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; bSmithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History, 10th and Constitution, NW Washington, DC 20560-0105, USA; cIntegrated Bioscience Program, Department of Biology, University of Akron, Akron, OH, USA; dDepartment of Biology, University of Vermont, 109 Carrigan Drive, Burlington, VT 05405-0086, USA; eDepartment of Terrestrial Zoology, Western Australian Museum, Locked Bag 49, Welshpool DC, WA 6986, Australia; fSchool of Animal Biology, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia; gHarry Butler Institute, Murdoch University, 90 South St., Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia; hDepartment of Ecology, University of Veterinary Medicine Budapest, H1077 Budapest, Hungary; iDivision of Invertebrate Zoology and Sackler Institute for Comparative Genomics, American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY 10024, USA; jNatural History Museum, University of Oslo, PO Box 1172, Blindern, NO-0318 Oslo, Norway; kDepartment of Natural History, University Museum of Bergen, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway Accepted 11 March 2019 Abstract We present a new phylogeny of the spider family Araneidae based on five genes (28S, 18S, COI, H3 and 16S) for 158 taxa, identi- fied and mainly sequenced by us. This includes 25 outgroups and 133 araneid ingroups representing the subfamilies Zygiellinae Simon, 1929, Nephilinae Simon, 1894, and the typical araneids, here informally named the “ARA Clade”.
    [Show full text]