From the Geosphere to the Cosmos

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

From the Geosphere to the Cosmos From the geopshere to the cosmos Synergies with astroparticle physics www.aspera-eu.org CREDITS Written by: Dr Ino Agrafioti (IN2P3/CNRS, France). Editorial Committee (in alphabetical order): Eugenio Coccia (INFN, Italy) Karl‐Heinz Kampert (Bergische Universität Wuppertal, Germany) Stavros Katsanevas (IN2P3/CNRS, France) Fabrice Piquemal (LSM/IN2P3/CNRS, France) Sean Paling (University of Sheffield/BUL, UK) Pasqual Coyle (CPPM/IN2P3/CNRS, France) Christian Spiering (DESY, GERMANY) Special thanks to the researchers that also proofread the pages related to their research: Michel Andre FFF SSSSSSS FFF SSSSSSS Nikoletta Bellou FFF SSSSSSS FFF SSSSSSS Anne Deschamps FFF SSSSSSS FFF SSSSSSS Benedetto d’Etorre FFF SSSSSSS FFF SSSSSSS Jasper Kirkby FFF SSSSSSS FFF SSSSSSS Jacques Marteau FFF SSSSSSS FFF SSSSSSS Hans Van Haren FFF SSSSSSS Cover by: Arnaud Marsollier Produced by: ASPERA‐2 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS CREDITS ............................................................................................................................................................................. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS........................................................................................................................................................ 3 1. INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................................................... 5 2. ApP RESEARCH INFRASTRUCTURES.....................................................................................................................8 2.1. DETECTING THE COSMIC RAIN........................................................................................................................8 2.2. COSMIC SILENCE TO LISTEN TO THE PAST ................................................................................................... 10 2.3. JOURNEY INTO THE DEEP.............................................................................................................................. 13 3. SYNERGIES.............................................................................................................................................................15 3.1. UNDERSTANDING THE ATMOSPHERE.......................................................................................................... 15 3.1.1. SPACE WEATHER....................................................................................................................................... 16 3.1.2. ATMOSPHERIC MONITORING.............................................................................................................. 17 3.1.3. COSMOCLIMATOLOGY..........................................................................................................................21 3.1.4. ATMOSPHERIC TEMPERATURE VARIATION .......................................................................................23 3.1.5. THUNDERSTORMS AND LIGHTNING ...................................................................................................24 3.2. UNDERSTANDING THE EARTH FROM THE SURFACE TO THE DEEP............................................................25 3.2.1. EROSION RATE CALCULATION ............................................................................................................26 3.2.2. COASTAL ROCK CLIFF EROSION .........................................................................................................27 3.2.3. CHRONOLOGY for PALEOENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH...................................................................28 3.2.4. PALEOCLIMATE.....................................................................................................................................29 3.2.5. VOLCANO TOMOGRAPHY using MUONS............................................................................................30 3.2.6. EARTH’s INTERIOR using GEONEUTRINOS ......................................................................................... 31 3.2.7. EARTH RADIOGRAPHY .........................................................................................................................32 3.3. UNDERSTANDING THE OCEAN......................................................................................................................33 3.3.1. CONTINUOUS OCEANOGRAPHIC DATA ..............................................................................................34 3.3.2. SEDIMENT TRANSPORT .......................................................................................................................35 3.3.3. OXYGEN DYNAMICS .............................................................................................................................36 3.3.4. RADIOACTIVITY.....................................................................................................................................37 3.3.5. INTERNAL WAVES.................................................................................................................................38 3.3.6. CORAL CHRONOLOGY..........................................................................................................................39 3.4. MEASURING AND ATTEMPTING TO PREDICT EARTHQUAKES................................................................... 40 3.4.1. EARTHQUAKE MONITORING GRID...................................................................................................... 41 3.4.2. EARTHQUAKE AND TSUNAMI MONITORING .....................................................................................42 3.4.3. STUDYING THE LAKE ENVIRONMENT .................................................................................................43 3 3.4.4. SEISMO‐ELECTROMAGNETIC COUPLINGS ......................................................................................... 44 3.4.5. EARTHQUAKE PHYSICS .......................................................................................................................45 3.4.6. SLOW EARTHQUAKE MONITORING................................................................................................... 46 3.5. BIODIVERSITY.................................................................................................................................................47 3.5.1. UNDERWATER SOUND MONITORING ............................................................................................... 49 3.5.2. DEEP SEA BIOLUMINESCENCE.............................................................................................................50 3.5.3. BIODIVERSITY UNDER ICE....................................................................................................................52 3.5.4. BIODEGRADATION ...............................................................................................................................53 3.5.5. MICROBIOLOGY....................................................................................................................................54 3.5.6. BIOFOULING .........................................................................................................................................55 3.5.7. IMPACT OF RADIATION........................................................................................................................56 3.5.8. EXTREMOPHILES ..................................................................................................................................57 3.6. APPLICATIONS................................................................................................................................................58 3.6.1. WINE DATATION...................................................................................................................................59 3.6.2. SALT CHARACTERISATION.................................................................................................................. 60 3.6.3. SOFT‐ERROR RATE IN ELECTRONICS................................................................................................... 61 3.6.4. ROCK DEFORMATION ..........................................................................................................................62 4. PERSPECTIVES FOR THE FUTURE........................................................................................................................ 63 4.1. CLIMATE CHANGE ......................................................................................................................................... 64 4.2. GEOHAZARDS................................................................................................................................................ 66 4.3. ENERGY...........................................................................................................................................................67 4.4. BIODIVERSITY.................................................................................................................................................70 4.5. TOWARDS COLLABORATIONS WITH OTHER SCIENCES ..............................................................................72 4.5.1. WHAT TYPES OF COLLABORATION?....................................................................................................72 4.5.2. WHAT BARRIERS? WHAT CHANGES ARE NEEDED? ............................................................................73 4.6. SYNERGIES USING ApP INFRASTRUCTURES ................................................................................................76
Recommended publications
  • Smithsonian Institution Archives (SIA)
    SMITHSONIAN OPPORTUNITIES FOR RESEARCH AND STUDY 2020 Office of Fellowships and Internships Smithsonian Institution Washington, DC The Smithsonian Opportunities for Research and Study Guide Can be Found Online at http://www.smithsonianofi.com/sors-introduction/ Version 2.0 (Updated January 2020) Copyright © 2020 by Smithsonian Institution Table of Contents Table of Contents .................................................................................................................................................................................................. 1 How to Use This Book .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Anacostia Community Museum (ACM) ........................................................................................................................................................ 2 Archives of American Art (AAA) ....................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Asian Pacific American Center (APAC) .......................................................................................................................................................... 6 Center for Folklife and Cultural Heritage (CFCH) ...................................................................................................................................... 7 Cooper-Hewitt,
    [Show full text]
  • The Gran Sasso Underground Laboratory Program
    The Gran Sasso Underground Laboratory Program Eugenio Coccia INFN Gran Sasso and University of Rome “Tor Vergata” [email protected] XXXIII International Meeting on Fundamental Physics Benasque - March 7, 2005 Underground Laboratories Boulby UK Modane France Canfranc Spain INFN Gran Sasso National Laboratory LNGSLNGS ROME QuickTime™ and a Photo - JPEG decompressor are needed to see this picture. L’AQUILA Tunnel of 10.4 km TERAMO In 1979 A. Zichichi proposed to the Parliament the project of a large underground laboratory close to the Gran Sasso highway tunnel, then under construction In 1982 the Parliament approved the construction, finished in 1987 In 1989 the first experiment, MACRO, started taking data LABORATORI NAZIONALI DEL GRAN SASSO - INFN Largest underground laboratory for astroparticle physics 1400 m rock coverage cosmic µ reduction= 10–6 (1 /m2 h) underground area: 18 000 m2 external facilities Research lines easy access • Neutrino physics 756 scientists from 25 countries Permanent staff = 66 positions (mass, oscillations, stellar physics) • Dark matter • Nuclear reactions of astrophysics interest • Gravitational waves • Geophysics • Biology LNGS Users Foreigners: 356 from 24 countries Italians: 364 Permanent Staff: 64 people Administration Public relationships support Secretariats (visa, work permissions) Outreach Environmental issues Prevention, safety, security External facilities General, safety, electrical plants Civil works Chemistry Cryogenics Mechanical shop Electronics Computing and networks Offices Assembly halls Lab
    [Show full text]
  • Required Sensitivity to Search the Neutrinoless Double Beta Decay in 124Sn
    Required sensitivity to search the neutrinoless double beta decay in 124Sn Manoj Kumar Singh,1;2∗ Lakhwinder Singh,1;2 Vivek Sharma,1;2 Manoj Kumar Singh,1 Abhishek Kumar,1 Akash Pandey,1 Venktesh Singh,1∗ Henry Tsz-King Wong2 1 Department of Physics, Institute of Science, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221005, India. 2 Institute of Physics, Academia Sinica, Taipei 11529, Taiwan. E-mail: ∗ [email protected] E-mail: ∗ [email protected] Abstract. The INdias TIN (TIN.TIN) detector is under development in the search for neutrinoless double-β decay (0νββ) using 90% enriched 124Sn isotope as the target mass. This detector will be housed in the upcoming underground facility of the India based Neutrino Observatory. We present the most important experimental parameters that would be used in the study of required sensitivity for the TIN.TIN experiment to probe the neutrino mass hierarchy. The sensitivity of the TIN.TIN detector in the presence of sole two neutrino double-β decay (2νββ) decay background is studied at various energy resolutions. The most optimistic and pessimistic scenario to probe the neutrino mass hierarchy at 3σ sensitivity level and 90% C.L. is also discussed. Keywords: Double Beta Decay, Nuclear Matrix Element, Neutrino Mass Hierarchy. arXiv:1802.04484v2 [hep-ph] 25 Oct 2018 PACS numbers: 12.60.Fr, 11.15.Ex, 23.40-s, 14.60.Pq Required sensitivity to search the neutrinoless double beta decay in 124Sn 2 1. Introduction Neutrinoless double-β decay (0νββ) is an interesting venue to look for the most important question whether neutrinos have Majorana or Dirac nature.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Physics
    Nuclear Physics Overview One of the enduring mysteries of the universe is the nature of matter—what are its basic constituents and how do they interact to form the properties we observe? The largest contribution by far to the mass of the visible matter we are familiar with comes from protons and heavier nuclei. The mission of the Nuclear Physics (NP) program is to discover, explore, and understand all forms of nuclear matter. Although the fundamental particles that compose nuclear matter—quarks and gluons—are themselves relatively well understood, exactly how they interact and combine to form the different types of matter observed in the universe today and during its evolution remains largely unknown. Nuclear physicists seek to understand not just the familiar forms of matter we see around us, but also exotic forms such as those that existed in the first moments after the Big Bang and that exist today inside neutron stars, and to understand why matter takes on the specific forms now observed in nature. Nuclear physics addresses three broad, yet tightly interrelated, scientific thrusts: Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD); Nuclei and Nuclear Astrophysics; and Fundamental Symmetries: . QCD seeks to develop a complete understanding of how the fundamental particles that compose nuclear matter, the quarks and gluons, assemble themselves into composite nuclear particles such as protons and neutrons, how nuclear forces arise between these composite particles that lead to nuclei, and how novel forms of bulk, strongly interacting matter behave, such as the quark-gluon plasma that formed in the early universe. Nuclei and Nuclear Astrophysics seeks to understand how protons and neutrons combine to form atomic nuclei, including some now being observed for the first time, and how these nuclei have arisen during the 13.8 billion years since the birth of the cosmos.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1709.05353V1 [Astro-Ph.IM] 15 Sep 2017
    Draft version September 19, 2017 Typeset using LATEX twocolumn style in AASTeX61 THE DEDICATED MONITOR OF EXOTRANSITS AND TRANSIENTS (DEMONEXT): SYSTEM OVERVIEW AND YEAR ONE RESULTS FROM A LOW-COST ROBOTIC TELESCOPE FOR FOLLOW-UP OF EXOPLANETARY TRANSITS AND TRANSIENTS Steven Villanueva Jr.,1 B. Scott Gaudi,1 Richard W. Pogge,1, 2 Jason D. Eastman,3 Keivan G. Stassun,4 Mark Trueblood,5 and Patricia Trueblood5 1Department of Astronomy, The Ohio State University, 140 West 18th Av., Columbus, OH 43210, USA 2Department of Astronomy and Center for Cosmology & Astro-Particle Physics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA 3Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden St., Cambridge, MA 02138, USA 4Department of Physics & Astronomy, Vanderbilt University, 6301 Stevenson Center, Nashville, TN 37235, USA 5Winer Observatory, P.O. Box 797, Sonoita, Arizona 85637-0797, USA Submitted to the Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific ABSTRACT We report on the design and first year of operations of the DEdicated MONitor of EXotransits and Transients (DEMONEXT). DEMONEXT is a 20 inch (0.5-m) robotic telescope using a PlaneWave CDK20 telescope on a Mathis instruments MI-750/1000 fork mount. DEMONEXT is equipped with a 2048 × 2048 pixel Finger Lakes Instruments (FLI) detector, a 10-position filter wheel with an electronic focuser and B, V , R, I, g0, r0, i0, z0, and clear filters. DEMONEXT operates in a continuous observing mode and achieves 2{4 mmag raw, unbinned, precision on bright V < 13 targets with 20{120 second exposures, and 1 mmag precision achieved by binning on 5{6 minute timescales.
    [Show full text]
  • THE BOREXINO IMPACT in the GLOBAL ANALYSIS of NEUTRINO DATA Settore Scientifico Disciplinare FIS/04
    UNIVERSITA’ DEGLI STUDI DI MILANO DIPARTIMENTO DI FISICA SCUOLA DI DOTTORATO IN FISICA, ASTROFISICA E FISICA APPLICATA CICLO XXIV THE BOREXINO IMPACT IN THE GLOBAL ANALYSIS OF NEUTRINO DATA Settore Scientifico Disciplinare FIS/04 Tesi di Dottorato di: Alessandra Carlotta Re Tutore: Prof.ssa Emanuela Meroni Coordinatore: Prof. Marco Bersanelli Anno Accademico 2010-2011 Contents Introduction1 1 Neutrino Physics3 1.1 Neutrinos in the Standard Model . .4 1.2 Massive neutrinos . .7 1.3 Solar Neutrinos . .8 1.3.1 pp chain . .9 1.3.2 CNO chain . 13 1.3.3 The Standard Solar Model . 13 1.4 Other sources of neutrinos . 17 1.5 Neutrino Oscillation . 18 1.5.1 Vacuum oscillations . 20 1.5.2 Matter-enhanced oscillations . 22 1.5.3 The MSW effect for solar neutrinos . 26 1.6 Solar neutrino experiments . 28 1.7 Reactor neutrino experiments . 33 1.8 The global analysis of neutrino data . 34 2 The Borexino experiment 37 2.1 The LNGS underground laboratory . 38 2.2 The detector design . 40 2.3 Signal processing and Data Acquisition System . 44 2.4 Calibration and monitoring . 45 2.5 Neutrino detection in Borexino . 47 2.5.1 Neutrino scattering cross-section . 48 2.6 7Be solar neutrino . 48 2.6.1 Seasonal variations . 50 2.7 Radioactive backgrounds in Borexino . 51 I CONTENTS 2.7.1 External backgrounds . 53 2.7.2 Internal backgrounds . 54 2.8 Physics goals and achieved results . 57 2.8.1 7Be solar neutrino flux measurement . 57 2.8.2 The day-night asymmetry measurement . 58 2.8.3 8B neutrino flux measurement .
    [Show full text]
  • RES-NOVA Sensitivity to Core-Collapse and Failed Core-Collapse Supernova Neutrinos
    Prepared for submission to JCAP RES-NOVA sensitivity to core-collapse and failed core-collapse supernova neutrinos L. Pattavinaa;b;1 N. Ferreiro Iachellinic;1 L. Pagnaninia;d L. Canonicac E. Celib;d M. Clemenzae F. Ferronid;f E. Fiorinie A. Garaic L. Gironie M. Mancusoc S. Nisia F. Petriccac S. Pirroa S. Pozzie A. Puiua;d J. Rotheb S. Schönertb L. Shtembaric R. Straussb V. Wagnerb aINFN Laboratori Nazionali del Gran Sasso, 67100 Assergi, Italy bPhysik-Department and Excellence Cluster Origins, Technische Universität München, 85747 Garching, Germany arXiv:2103.08672v2 [astro-ph.IM] 16 Aug 2021 cMax-Planck-Institut für Physik, 80805 München, Germany dGran Sasso Science Institute, 67100, L’Aquila, Italy eINFN Sezione Milano - Bicocca and Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Milano - Bicocca, 20126 Milano, Italy f INFN Sezione di Roma1, 00185, Roma, Italy 1Corresponding authors. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], ettore.fi[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Abstract. RES-NOVA is a new proposed experiment for the investigation of astrophysical neutrino sources with archaeological Pb-based cryogenic detectors. RES-NOVA will exploit Coherent Elastic neutrino-Nucleus Scattering (CEνNS) as detection channel, thus it will be equally sensitive to all neutrino flavors produced by Supernovae (SNe).
    [Show full text]
  • Full TIPP 2011 Program Book
    Second International Conference on Technology and Instrumentation in Particle Physics June 9-14, 2011 Program & Abstracts Sheraton Chicago Hotel and Towers, Chicago IL ii TIPP 2011 — June 9-14, 2011 Table of Contents Acknowledgements .................................................................................................................................... v Session Conveners ...................................................................................................................................vii Session Chairs .......................................................................................................................................... ix Agenda ....................................................................................................................................................... 1 Abstracts .................................................................................................................................................. 35 Poster Abstracts ..................................................................................................................................... 197 Abstract Index ........................................................................................................................................ 231 Poster Index ........................................................................................................................................... 247 Author List .............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Fet Research Newsletter
    Faculty of Engineering and Technology November 2019 FET RESEARCH NEWSLETTER EXTERNAL RESEARCH GRANTS SECURED (THRESHOLD: £10K) ARI Dr. Owen McAree. EPSRC GCRF Global Research £460k allocated to LJMU, ‘Probing the Cosmological Translation Awards, October 2019 – March 2021. Universe with Lensing, CMB and 21cm Data, Dr. BEST . STFC Ernest Rutherford Joachim Harnois-Deraps US $600k allocated to LJMU, Development of non- Fellowship, 2020-2025. invasive diagnostic tool for lymphatic filariasis £575k allocated to LJMU, Using drones to protect microfilariae detection Dr. Patryk Kot (PI), Prof. Andy biodiversity and spur economic growth in Madagascar, Shaw and Dr. Magomed Muradov. FET as Co-I in a Prof. Steve Longmore (PI), Dr. Paul Fergus, Dr. Carl total grant $1.3m, led by Liverpool School of Tropical Chalmers, Dr. Fred Bezombes, Prof. Serge Wich and Medicine. Gates Foundation, 2019-2022. AWARDS/PRIZES/KEYNOTE ADDRESSES (AT RECOGNISED INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCES) (APM/PROTECT) Prof. Paulo Lisboa (APM) and Dr. Nanotechnology”. Dr. Kolivand also delivered a keynote Hoshang Kolivand (PROTECT) both delivered speech at International Conference on Engineering keynote presentations at the Developments in eSystems Technology & Applied Sciences entitled “Current and Engineering (DeSE) conference, Kazan, Russia, 7-10 Future of New Immersive Technology”, Dubai, October 2019. Prof. Lisboa’s address was titled “A September 18th -19th 2019 UAE, 2019. Machine Learning in Sports Analysis” and Dr. Kolivand’s (LOOM) Prof. Jin Wang delivered a keynote address presentation was titled “A Glimpse of Future Immersive “Risk-based decision making in design and operation of Technologies using Virtual and Augmented Reality”. large engineering systems under uncertainties” at the 11th (PROTECT) Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Status and Outlook of the CUORE and CUPID Experimental Calorimetry Programs: an Overview
    Status and Outlook of the CUORE and CUPID Experimental Calorimetry Programs: An Overview Danielle H. Speller for the CUORE and CUPID Collaborations Johns Hopkins University August 5, 2020 Slides provided by CUORE, CUPID, CUPID‐Mo, and Acknowledgements CUPID‐0 Collaborations 8/5/2020 Danielle H. Speller (JHU), CUORE/CUPID, Snowmass Neutrino Workshop 2 Searching for Neutrinoless Double‐Beta Decay with CUORE CUORE: The Cryogenic Underground Observatory for Rare Events • The first tonne‐scale 0νββ experiment operating with thermal detectors • Main objective: 0νββ in 130Te 3 • 988 TeO2 crystals, 5×5×5 cm each • Total mass: 742 kg TeO2 • 130Te mass: 206 kg (all natural abundance) • Macrocalorimeter operation in ~10 mK cryostat Heat bath ~10 mK Thermistor (NTD-Ge) • Located underground at LNGS (Italy) (Copper) • Expected energy resolution at 2615 keV: 5 keV Absorber Crystal (TeO2) FWHM • Background goal: 0.01 cts/(keV∙kg ∙yr) at Qββ 0ν 25 • Sensitivity: T1/2 = 9×10 yr (90% C.I.) in 5 Energy Cryogenics 102, 9‐21 (2019). Thermal coupling release arxiv:1904.05745 years of data collection (Eur. Phys. J. C (2017) (PTFE) Cryogenics 93, 56‐65 (2018). 77:532) arxiv:1712.02753 Danielle H. Speller (JHU), CUORE/CUPID, Snowmass Neutrino 8/5/2020 3 Workshop • Total analyzed exposure: region of interest Recent Results: Improved 372.5 kg∙yr • Median exclusion sensitivity: • Resolution (expo.‐weighted 1.7 x 1025 yr 130 harmonic avg, Qββ): 7.0±0.4 0ν 25 • T1/2 > 3.2 x 10 yr (90% C.I.) Limit on 0νββ in Te with keV Bayesian lower limit on 130Te • Background: 1.38±0.07 x 10‐2 half‐life CUORE (2020) cts/(keV∙kg∙yr) in the 0νββ Phys.
    [Show full text]
  • Neutrinoless Double Beta Decay Searches
    FLASY2019: 8th Workshop on Flavor Symmetries and Consequences in 2016 Symmetry Magazine Accelerators and Cosmology Neutrinoless Double Beta Decay Ke Han (韩柯) Shanghai Jiao Tong University Searches: Status and Prospects 07/18, 2019 Outline .General considerations for NLDBD experiments .Current status and plans for NLDBD searches worldwide .Opportunities at CJPL-II NLDBD proposals in China PandaX series experiments for NLDBD of 136Xe 07/22/19 KE HAN (SJTU), FLASY2019 2 Majorana neutrino and NLDBD From Physics World 1935, Goeppert-Mayer 1937, Majorana 1939, Furry Two-Neutrino double beta decay Majorana Neutrino Neutrinoless double beta decay NLDBD 1930, Pauli 1933, Fermi + 2 + (2 ) Idea of neutrino Beta decay theory 136 136 − 07/22/19 54 → KE56 HAN (SJTU), FLASY2019 3 ̅ NLDBD probes the nature of neutrinos . Majorana or Dirac . Lepton number violation . Measures effective Majorana mass: relate 0νββ to the neutrino oscillation physics Normal Inverted Phase space factor Current Experiments Nuclear matrix element Effective Majorana neutrino mass: 07/22/19 KE HAN (SJTU), FLASY2019 4 Detection of double beta decay . Examples: . Measure energies of emitted electrons + 2 + (2 ) . Electron tracks are a huge plus 136 136 − 54 → 56 + 2 + (2)̅ . Daughter nuclei identification 130 130 − 52 → 54 ̅ 2νββ 0νββ T-REX: arXiv:1512.07926 Sum of two electrons energy Simulated track of 0νββ in high pressure Xe 07/22/19 KE HAN (SJTU), FLASY2019 5 Impressive experimental progress . ~100 kg of isotopes . ~100-person collaborations . Deep underground . Shielding + clean detector 1E+27 1E+25 1E+23 1E+21 life limit (year) life - 1E+19 half 1E+17 Sn Ca νββ Ge Te 0 1E+15 Xe 1E+13 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 Year .
    [Show full text]
  • FAS 06 Winterr 83
    Issue 83 Published by the Federation of Astronomical Societies ISSN 1361 - 4126 Winter 2006 PRESIDENT Callum Potter, The Cottage, Bredon’s Hardwick, Tewkesbury, Glos., GL20 7EE Tel: 01684 773256 E-mail: [email protected] TREASURER Peter Cooke, Haven Cottage, Frithville, Boston, Lincs, PE22 7DS Tel: 01205 750868 E-mail: [email protected] SECRETARY Sam George, 10 Dovedale Road, Perry Common, Birmingham. B23 5BG Tel: 0121 608 5161 E-mail [email protected] EDITOR Frank Johns, 38 Chester Road, Newquay, Cornwall. TR7 2RH Tel: 01637 878020 E-mail [email protected] Fax: 08700 558463 http://www.fedastro.org.uk ANOTHER SUCCESSFUL FAS ANNUAL CONVENTION This year the Annual Convention of the Federation of Astronomi- cal Societies was held at The Birmingham and Midland Institute and five intrepid G-Astronomers wended their way up the A30 and M5 - via the newly agreed club watering hole, The Harris Arms at Portgate, Lewdown. This hostelry served it's purpose well. As indeed did the BMI, which comfortably housed the FAS Convention - except of course until one realised that this establishment predated air condi- tioning - or even, in the otherwise impressive auditorium, ventilation. Ishwara Chandra of the National Centre for Radio Astrophysics, The Tata Institute, India, gave a brief introduction to Radio Astron- omy, emphasising that deep sky radio images are weak and amount to the arrival of a mere 1 mJ in 100 years. Modern long baseline interfer- ometric techniques, however, result in better resolution than conven- tional optical methods. The GMRT (Giant Metrewave Radio Tele- scope) instrument, a 30m x 45 antenna array at Khodad, India, oper- ates in the 150 - 610 MHz waveband range and has embarked on measurements intended to discover the amount of Hydrogen in the early Universe.
    [Show full text]