1 the History and Theory of Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions 1

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

1 the History and Theory of Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions 1 Notes 1 The History and Theory of Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions 1. John Woolman dressed almost entirely in white/cream because many of the dyes of the day, including indigo, were produced by slave labor. 2. There are many active BDS networks in Europe, which operate in a completely different sociopolitical and economic context. Because of the focus on local configurations and how local context shapes the social change mechanisms used by activists (as well as due to practical considerations), I selected cases in the United States to provide at least a measure of “control” for comparing thematically between them. After speaking with European scholars, BDS is not viewed as radical and controversial in the same way as it is in the United States. 3. There are many instances of the US Congress issuing unsolicited statements indicating their strong support of Israeli government policies and actions, not all of which are factually accurate, and some of which are seen as too “pro-Israel” even by Israelis. For example, Congress issued a strong statement against the Goldstone Report in 2009 (Goldstone 2009), in support of Israeli armed action against the Gaza Flotilla in 2010 (Zunes 2010), and against the Palestinian bid for statehood in 2011 (Guttman 2011a). 4. To be clear, the BDS movement is not calling for sanctions like those that were placed on Iraq, but for targeted, limited sanctions. 5. For simplicity sake I refer to the collection of activists and groups engaged in boycott and divestment activities as the “BDS movement”, although as discussed in this book, it is not a coherent, monolithic, tightly knit social movement in the traditional sense, particularly since the European and American variants are quite different due to very different socioeconomic and political contexts. Furthermore, some groups, like the Presbyterian Church (USA) were careful to differentiate their call for divestment from three specific companies from the broader BDS movement, even though opposition sought to lump them together. 6. The concept of “pro-Israel” is contested, and Jewish groups on both sides of the BDS issue assert that they are “pro-Israel.” Conventionally, “pro-Israel” has been associated with the Israel lobby in the United States, which tends to stand behind the policies and practices of the Israeli government without question. This issue of what it means to be “pro-Israel” is discussed more in the various case studies, as it is a highly salient issue. 200 ● Notes 7. I have seen multiple email discussions that illustrate this misunderstand- ing; while PACBI repeatedly emphasizes the focus on institutions, individual Israeli academics report being targeted independent of institutional affilia- tion, and many Israeli academics face pressure from their home institutions and broader society for their political activism, such as Neve Gordon at Ben Gurion University (Flusfeder 2012). 8. As discussed more in the case study of UC Berkeley, the history of divest- ment activism against South African apartheid has influenced student activ- ism regarding the BDS campaign against Israeli occupation. For example, Hampshire College in Massachusetts was one of the first to divest from South Africa and was again the first to divest from military corporations profiting from the occupation (Horowitz and Weiss 2010; Soule 2009, 81). UC Berkeley, likewise, played an active role in the struggle to end apartheid. 9. While the boycott still exists on the books of some states, overall most gov- ernments in the region engage in trade with Israel (Stop the Wall Campaign 2007). 10. There are many excellent accounts of the history of the Oslo Accords and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and the debates surrounding the “no partner” narrative and what actually occurred at the July 2000 Camp David meet- ing between Ehud Barak and Yasser Arafat are widely available. The Geneva Initiative of 2002 demonstrated that there was indeed a Palestinian partner, as have subsequent Palestinian efforts at state building and reform in the Salam Fayyad era. In addition to histories of the conflict by acclaimed scholars such as Avi Shlaim and David Lesch, for more on the conflict and the Oslo process, see Bröning (2011); Agha and Malley (2001); Miller (2008); Meital (2006); Said (1995); Karsh (1996); and Milton-Edwards (2009). 11. The PLO was first created by the Arab League in 1964, but after the 1967 war in which Israel gained control of the West Bank and Gaza Strip (along with the Golan Heights from Syria and the Sinai Peninsula from Egypt), Palestinian nationalists sought to take control of their destiny rather than rely on Arab states. The umbrella organization, which includes representatives from numerous political factions and other key Palestinian constituencies, like trade and agricultural unions, included a quasi-government, the Palestinian National Council (PNC) as well as armed elements such as the Palestinian Liberation Army (PLA). It is worth mentioning that Hamas, the Islamic Resistance Movement, is not a part of the PLO because it did not exist at the time of the PLO’s formation, and negotiations for Hamas to join the PLO in the wake of the 2005 Cairo agreement have not ever been finalized due to the worsening of relations between Hamas and Fatah in the aftermath of the 2006 Parliamentary elections, when Hamas won a majority of seats (Milton- Edwards 2009, 131–133; Caridi 2012, 333). 12. The Arabic word “intifada” is usually translated as “uprising” but literally means “shaking off.” 13. It is important to note that Israelis and Palestinians differ in their interpreta- tion and application of international law, particularly regarding the law as it Notes ● 201 applies to the Occupied Palestinian Territories, which Israel refers to as “Judea and Samaria” or else as the “disputed territories,” denying the applicability of the Fourth Geneva Convention even as they assert that they uphold its requirements (Hajjar 2005). Similarly, Israel deems the Gaza Strip free from occupation, whereas the international community, particularly those engaged in international humanitarian organizations, consider the Gaza Strip to be occupied, consistent with the definition of occupation as “effective control” (Hallward 2011a; ICRC 2004). 2 Explaining the Contentiousness of BDS: Rival Framings of Identity, Peace, and Power 1. While there may be some activists who do wish to change the nature of Israel so that the state is not defined by its Jewish identity, there are many activists engaging in tactics of BDS who specifically endorse a two-state solution. 2. While an interesting question, it is beyond the scope of this study to investigate why it is that some Jews find themselves critical of Israeli policies as a result of their Jewish identity and why others feel unable to criticize Israel because of their Jewish identity. However, based on conversations over the years, it seems that part of it has to do with how that “Jewish” identity was constructed. Those whose families focused on the social teachings of the Jewish prophets, and who were involved in engaged, “progressive” communities are more likely to be involved in BDS activism than those whose families focused on strict adherence to kashrut and were less involved in organizing around socioeco- nomic and political issues beyond a narrowly defined Jewish community. 3. This statement of course equates BDS with denying the legitimacy of the State of Israel, which is not necessarily the case, depending on one’s approach to BDS. 4. Since June 2007, the PNA has had minimal control in the Hamas-ruled Gaza Strip. 5. It is worth emphasizing again that because of the different strands of opposi- tion to BDS, as well as different strands of BDS activism, power dynamics are exactly that, dynamic, and specific to each context. Some BDS campaigns are more coercive than others, seeking to prevent corporations from attaining contracts, for example, whereas others are more symbolic and would have very little actual economic impact on a target, but would harm the corporate image or raise awareness about an issue. 3 CodePink’s “Stolen Beauty” Campaign: Creativity in Action 1. Video clips and narrative descriptions of Stolen Beauty campaign actions are available on the Stolen Beauty webpage, http://www.codepinkalert.org/article. php?id=5006 (accessed October 11, 2012). 202 ● Notes 2. Although he does not explicitly discuss the BDS movement, Yossi Shain discusses this same phenomenon in Jewish and Armenian diaspora organiza- tions (Shain 2002). 4 UC Berkeley’s Student Government Divestment Bill: Power, Identity, and Fear 1. Many peace activists interviewed by the author for this and other projects note that the issue of one or two states is less important than the type of state(s) resulting vis-à-vis the rights and freedoms of the states’ occupants. For exam- ple, a single state could be an apartheid regime with one party dominating the other or a state for all its citizens with equal standing. 2. Rawls categorizes decent peoples as not having aggressive aims, using peaceful means such as diplomacy and trade to achieve their objectives, having a judi- ciary committed to the rule of law, extending human rights to all members of society, and regarding all citizens as moral (Avila 2007, 95–96). 5 The Olympia Food Co-op Boycott: Brokerage, Networks, and Local Culture 1. Groups like StandWithUs have anti-BDS fliers readily available on their website, and the Jewish Community Relations Council has a “rapid response team” ready to “monitor print, radio, and television media” and write letters to the editor with talking points provided by the JCRC (JCRC n.d.). 6 The Presbyterian Church USA: Institutions, Justice, and History 1. It is worth mentioning, however, that the Church is also a conservative institu- tion, and there is a great deal of variation within and across denominations.
Recommended publications
  • Arguing with God: a Rhetorical Analysis of 'The God Debates'
    MPC MAJOR RESEARCH PAPER Arguing with God: A Rhetorical Analysis of ‘The God Debates’ VIN HENEY 500467928 Supervisor: Dr. Jean Mason The Major Research Paper is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Professional Communication Ryerson University Toronto, Ontario, Canada July 18, 2012 ARGUING WITH GOD ii ARGUING WITH GOD AUTHOR'S DECLARATION FOR ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION OF A MAJOR RESEARCH PAPER I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this Major Research Paper and the accompanying Research Poster. This is a true copy of the MRP and the research poster, including any required final revisions, as accepted by my examiners. I authorize Ryerson University to lend this major research paper and/or poster to other institutions or individuals for the purpose of scholarly research. I further authorize Ryerson University to reproduce this MRP and/or poster by photocopying or by other means, in total or in part, at the request of other institutions or individuals for the purpose of scholarly research. I understand that my MRP and/or my MRP research poster may be made electronically available to the public. iii ARGUING WITH GOD ABSTRACT Recently published pro-atheist Books By Richard Dawkins, Sam Harris, and Christopher Hitchens have reignited the age-old debate aBout the existence of God. Many pro-faith Books have Been written in response. The deliberations Between theists and atheists have moved Beyond the written word and onto the PuBlic deBate Platform. The Present PaPer oBserves three such ‘God deBates’ through the theoretical lens of rhetoric. Using a modified grounded theory approach, and Borrowing from literature concerning PuBlic deBates and religious rhetoric, a number of rhetorical strategies are identified.
    [Show full text]
  • A Pre-Feasibility Study on Water Conveyance Routes to the Dead
    A PRE-FEASIBILITY STUDY ON WATER CONVEYANCE ROUTES TO THE DEAD SEA Published by Arava Institute for Environmental Studies, Kibbutz Ketura, D.N Hevel Eilot 88840, ISRAEL. Copyright by Willner Bros. Ltd. 2013. All rights reserved. Funded by: Willner Bros Ltd. Publisher: Arava Institute for Environmental Studies Research Team: Samuel E. Willner, Dr. Clive Lipchin, Shira Kronich, Tal Amiel, Nathan Hartshorne and Shae Selix www.arava.org TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 1 2 HISTORICAL REVIEW 5 2.1 THE EVOLUTION OF THE MED-DEAD SEA CONVEYANCE PROJECT ................................................................... 7 2.2 THE HISTORY OF THE CONVEYANCE SINCE ISRAELI INDEPENDENCE .................................................................. 9 2.3 UNITED NATIONS INTERVENTION ......................................................................................................... 12 2.4 MULTILATERAL COOPERATION ............................................................................................................ 12 3 MED-DEAD PROJECT BENEFITS 14 3.1 WATER MANAGEMENT IN ISRAEL, JORDAN AND THE PALESTINIAN AUTHORITY ............................................... 14 3.2 POWER GENERATION IN ISRAEL ........................................................................................................... 18 3.3 ENERGY SECTOR IN THE PALESTINIAN AUTHORITY .................................................................................... 20 3.4 POWER GENERATION IN JORDAN ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Very Narrow Bridge
    Rabbi Jay TelRav Yom Kippur Sermon 5780 A Very Narrow Bridge Earlier this year, my wife and I took our very first vacation without our children. Our son is coming up on his 9th birthday which gives you an idea how much we were looking forward to this. We planned the trip months ahead and decided on Barcelona. A city full of the things we craved like architecture and museums. We visited the masterpieces of the architect, Antoni Gaudi, and we went to the Picasso museum. We ate leisurely at a late hour and woke up calmly to sit in a cafe reading while drinking our espressos. It was the perfect escape from children! While we were taking our time in the Picasso museum, Julie decided to try to help me understand the work of the artist. We spent time on a series of works based on a masterpiece by Diego Velasquez called “Las Meninas”.1 While the original was classical renaissance style – very realistic, Picasso developed the characters and the setting using his own modernist style. He created hundreds of studies and developed each individual subject over and over again until he captured just what he was searching for. Each person in the original was still in the same location and the composition was the same but, beyond that, it was almost unrecognizable as a recreation of Las Meninas. Then, while we were talking about it, Julie said something that stuck with me. She said “Picasso is painting what he sees. He is not lying.” What an interesting way to think about the work of an artist.
    [Show full text]
  • Is Every Seder Kosher for Passover? A
    document, called “God’s Mercy Endures Forever: over should be to acknowledge cornmon roots in the Guidelines on the Presentation of Jews and Judaism in history of salvation. Any sense of ’restaging’ the Last Catholic Preaching.” Intended to implement locally the Supper of the Lord Jesus should be avoided. The rites implication of the 1985 Vatican Notes, the U.S. docu- of the Triduum (Holy Week) are the Church’s annual ment deals largely with problems presented for Catho- memorial of the events of Jesus’ dying and rising. chers by difficult passages in the New Testament. Seders arranged at or in cooperation with local syna- It does, however, offer two ”pastoralactivities” of note. gogues are encouraged (No.28). The first was that the victims of the Shah should be We live in a unique time in the long history of remembered in prayer and penitence “on the Sun Jewish-Christian relations, a time of renewed hope closest to YmhaShoah” each year, giving sample inter- and understanding. Christian liturgical tradition cessions for use in Sunday Mass. The second related to began as an offshoot of Jewish worship. Indeed, the Passover. It is short enough to repeat here in full: earliest Christians, who were primarily Jews, looked ”It is becoming familiar in many parishes and to their own Jewish liturgical traditions to celebrate Catholic homes to participate in a Passover Seder dur- what they believed happened in Jesus’ life, death ing Holy Week. This practice can have educational and resurrection. Christians acknowledge this (long and spiritual value. It is wrong, however, to ”bap- suppressed) Jewish heritage of their faith when they tize” the seder by ending it with New Testament read- participate in a Passover seder with faith and re- ings about the Last Supper or, worse, turn it into a spect for God’s People, the Jews, and turn toward prologue to the Eucharist.
    [Show full text]
  • Abraham Joshua Heschel and Theology After the Holocaust Matthew Ae Net Denison University
    Denison Journal of Religion Volume 1 Article 2 2001 Abraham Joshua Heschel and Theology after the Holocaust Matthew aE net Denison University Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.denison.edu/religion Part of the Ethics in Religion Commons, and the Sociology of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Eanet, Matthew (2001) "Abraham Joshua Heschel and Theology after the Holocaust," Denison Journal of Religion: Vol. 1 , Article 2. Available at: http://digitalcommons.denison.edu/religion/vol1/iss1/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Denison Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Denison Journal of Religion by an authorized editor of Denison Digital Commons. THE DENISON JOURNAL OF RELIGION Eanet: Abraham Joshua Heschel and ITheology after the Holocaust Abraham Joshua Heschel and Theology after the Holocaust Matthew Eanet "Life in our time has been a nightmare for many of us, tranquility an interlude, happiness a fake. Who could breathe at a time when man was engaged in murdering the holy witness to God six million times?"1 hen Abraham Joshua Heschel entered the national spotlight as a pro- found religious thinker and strident social activist, he bore the garb W and look of an Eastern European Jew. A man of short stature, Rabbi Heschel looked the way religious Eastern European Jews have for hundreds of years: the traditional dark-colored suit with the white fringes of his prayer shawl hanging out beneath his sport coat, a skullcap hidden beneath a black full- brimmed hat, and a long, thick gray beard. An American leader, Heschel was, in every sense, a European Jew, steeped in the traditional Jewish communities of both Warsaw and Vilna.
    [Show full text]
  • From Israel's Perspective, Joe Biden Is As Good As It Gets—For A
    Selected articles concerning Israel, published weekly by Suburban Orthodox Toras Chaim’s (Baltimore) Israel Action Committee Edited by Jerry Appelbaum ( [email protected] ) | Founding editor: Sheldon J. Berman Z”L Issue 8 5 2 Volume 20 , Number 3 1 Parshias Re'eh | Shabbos Mevarchim August 15 , 20 20 From Israel’s Perspective, Joe Biden Is as Good as It Gets — for a Democrat By Shmuel Rosner nytimes.com August 9, 2020 And any vice - presidential pick is better than Susan election because we fear losing President Trump. For Rice. many reasons, he is seen by Israelis as one of the In the pile of old notebooks I saved from when I was friendliest leaders in the history of the United States - Israel covering American politics for an Israeli newspaper (and alliance. Israel is one of few countries in the world in when reporters still used a pad and pen), I found five which the pr esident is highly popular: A whopping 56 mentions of Joe Biden’s Israel story. percent of Israelis prefer Mr. Trump in the upcoming Most of them are from 2008 — first during the election, compared to 16 percent who support Mr. Biden. Democratic primary, when Mr. Biden was running against As far as Israelis are concerned, Mr. Biden has two Barack Obama, and then the general election, when Mr. disadvantages. He is not Mr. Trump, and he is a Biden was running alongside Mr. Obama. I was cover ing Democr at. In other words, he is not the candidate they that election for the Tel Aviv - based Haaretz, and every support and he comes from the party many of them mention of Israel was of interest to me.
    [Show full text]
  • Pharoah Said No. You Won't Believe What God Did Next. | Huffpost
    Pharoah Said No. You Won't Believe What God Did Next. | HuffPost US EDITION THE BLOG 04/02/2015 05:49 pm ET | Updated Jun 02, 2015 Pharoah Said No. You Won’t Believe What God Did Next. By Marty Kaplan Once, at our Seder, our friend Ira gave a running commentary on the Haggadah, offering a scientific explanation for every miracle and wonder in the Exodus story. The parting of the Reed Sea was a meteorological event. The burning bush was a glowing carbonized acacia bramble above a volcanic vent. The ten plagues? Blood (1) was a red tide of toxic algae in the Nile, which forced millions of frogs (2) to move onto the land, but then they all died, and that brought the biting gnats (3) and flies (4), which spread a livestock epidemic (5), and a disease that made people’s skin erupt in boils (6).... Debunking is too harsh a word for what Ira was doing. He was a reconciler. He wasn’t anti-miracle; he was pro-reason. He wanted to make it more comfortable for secular Jews to be present at the Seder table, to explain how belief in the Divine wasn’t a requirement, how the story was really about human freedom, not God’s plan. To Ira, Passover was based on a true story made truer by obviating the need for supernatural intervention. Over brisket, we debated the historic accuracy of the Biblical account. If two million Jews wandered Sinai for 40 years, why hasn’t anyone ever dug up evidence of that? Why hasn’t a single hieroglyphic about the Exodus ever been found — wasn’t this as big a deal for the Egyptians as it was for the Israelites? This was a couple of years before Rabbi David Wolpe would set off a furor in Jewry, not just in Westwood, when he told 2,000 congregants in his Passover sermon that “the truth is that virtually every modern archeologist who has investigated the story of the Exodus, with very few exceptions, agrees that the way the Bible describes the Exodus is not the way it happened, if it happened at all.” But this shouldn’t matter, he said.
    [Show full text]
  • JPS B'nai Mitzvah Torah Commentary
    The Many Faces of JPS Top row: Gittel Hilibrand, Esq., board president; David Smith, Esq., board chair; Carol Hupping, former managing editor; and David Lerman, board past president Middle row: Rabbi Barry L. Schwartz, director; Dr. Ruth Calderon, author; and Rabbi Joshua M. Davidson, Temple Emanu-El of New York | Dr. Lawrence H. Schiffman, co-editor Bottom row: Rabbi Arthur Green and Rabbi David Ellenson, authors | Joy Weinberg, managing editor; Dr. Malka Simkovich, author To make a tax-deductible donation to JPS or to inquire about supporting a program or a book publication, please contact director Rabbi Barry Schwartz at 215-832-0607 or [email protected] or visit jps.org. Are you building a Jewish home library? Look for the yad symbol for JPS recommendations New JPS B’nai Mitzvah Torah Commentary RABBI JEFFREY K. SALKIN A pivotal book for teens For too many Jewish young people, bar/bat mitz- vah has been the beginning of the end of their Jewish journeys. When students perceive the Torah as incomprehensible or irrelevant, many form the false impression that Judaism has noth- ing to say to them. Enter the game-changer: The JPS B’nai Mitzvah Torah Commentary shows teens in their own language how Torah addresses the issues in their world. The conversational tone is inviting and dignified, concise and substantial, direct and informative. The narrative summaries, “big” ideas, model divrei Torah, haftarot commentaries, and discussion questions will engage teens in studying the Torah and haftarot, in writing divrei Torah, and continuing to learn Torah throughout their lives—making it the book every rabbi, can- tor, parent, and tutor will also want to have.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Parshat Shemot: a Rabbi and an Atheist Walk Into a Synagogue…
    Parshat Shemot: A rabbi and an atheist walk into a synagogue… – Faith in God vs. knowledge of God While perusing the internet for a funny "a rabbi, an atheist, and a priest walk into a bar" joke with which to open this sermon, I came across a few atheist jokes—some better than others. One touches on the denial of God's existence: "Why can’t atheists solve exponential equations? Because they don’t believe in Higher Powers." Ouch. This one was a bit funnier. It deals with the need for empirical proof. "Why did the atheist cross the road? He thought there might be another side. But he wouldn’t believe it until he tested his hypothesis." Okay, I admit, not the best. I never did find that super-funny rabbi/atheist/priest joke I was looking for. But I think the two jokes—however painful they were to hear—do offer a nice segue into our topic this Shabbat: faith in God versus knowledge of God. 1. A modern debate And I will open with a real-life "a rabbi and an atheist walk into…" a synagogue episode—which took place on a cold November night back in 2007. Rabbi David Wolpe, the charismatic rabbi of the Conservative synagogue, Sinai Temple in LA, and Dr. Sam Harris, the acclaimed author of the atheist best-seller The End of Faith, engaged in a riveting back-and-forth on a topic for the ages: Does God exist? Everyone in the crowd could anticipate the speakers' bottom-line answer to this question already at the get-go.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel Has Been Home to a Renaissance of Jewish Culture
    INTRODUCTION Israel celebrates its 70th birthday this year, 2018, on 19 April. After 2,000 years of exile and persecution, the Jewish people have made up for lost time now that they finally have a state of their own again. Israel has flourished in its first 70 years of statehood and achieved more than many far older countries. Here are 70 of Israel’s achievements we are highlighting – from the sublime and world changing to the small but important: ISRAEL HAS ACHIEVED ITS CORE MISSION OF PROVIDING A STATE FOR THE JEWS WHERE THEY CAN BE FREE FROM PERSECUTION Israel, the only Jewish state, is open to all Jews. It serves as a lifeboat state for Jews from around the world. It provided refuge for many European Jews after the Holocaust, with 25% of the population in the 1960s being Holocaust survivors. If the Jewish people had had a state of their own in the 1930s, many more Jews would have been saved from the Holocaust. Israel survived an attack by 4 neighboring armies when it declared Independence in 1948. Israel has achieved peace with both Egypt and Newly formed Israel built an army to Jordan after multiple wars. defend itself with 50% of the soldiers being Holocaust survivors. In 1979 Israel withdrew from the Sinai Peninsula in return for normalising relations and demilitarisation of the Sinai. This agreement ended any prospect of another general Arab-Israeli war and has been a cornerstone of regional stability for nearly 40 years. Israel and Jordan signed a peace agreement in 1994. Not only did Israel achieve a successful emergency rescue of 14,500 Ethiopian Jews, nearly the entire Jewish population of Ethiopia, in under 36 hours, but it also broke the world record of carrying the most passengers on a 747 or any flying vehicle in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel 2019 Implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals
    IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS National Review ISRAEL 2019 IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS National Review ISRAEL 2019 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Acknowledgments are due to representatives of government ministries and agencies as well as many others from a variety of organizations, for their essential contributions to each chapter of this book. Many of these bodies are specifically cited within the relevant parts of this report. The inter-ministerial task force under the guidance of Ambassador Yacov Hadas-Handelsman, Israel’s Special Envoy for Sustainability and Climate Change of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and Galit Cohen, Senior Deputy Director General for Planning, Policy and Strategy of the Ministry of Environmental Protection, provided invaluable input and support throughout the process. Special thanks are due to Tzruya Calvão Chebach of Mentes Visíveis, Beth-Eden Kite of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Amit Yagur-Kroll of the Israel Central Bureau of Statistics, Ayelet Rosen of the Ministry of Environmental Protection and Shoshana Gabbay for compiling and editing this report and to Ziv Rotshtein of the Ministry of Environmental Protection for editorial assistance. 3 FOREWORD The international community is at a crossroads of countries. Moreover, our experience in overcoming historical proportions. The world is experiencing resource scarcity is becoming more relevant to an extreme challenges, not only climate change, but ever-increasing circle of climate change affected many social and economic upheavals to which only areas of the world. Our cooperation with countries ambitious and concerted efforts by all countries worldwide is given broad expression in our VNR, can provide appropriate responses. The vision is much of it carried out by Israel’s International clear.
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring Israeli Democracy (2011)
    Measuring Israeli Democracy (2011): Epistemological, Methodological, and Ethical Dilemmas Paper prepared for presentation at the WZB, Berlin, 23 January, 2012 Prof. Tamar Hermann* The Open University of Israel & the Israel Democracy Institute Draft, not for citation *Email address: [email protected] Personal homepage: http://www.openu.ac.il/Personal_sites/tamar-hermannE.html 1 This paper aims at presenting, from a reflective perspective, the various dilemmas facing the team conducting the Israeli Democracy Index annual research project in general and its 2011 edition1 in particular. After dealing generally with the issue of measuring democracy and contextualizing this project in the “universe” of similar measurements/indices/barometers, the article will focus on the epistemological, methodological, and ethical dilemmas to be dealt with when assessing—by surveying public opinion—the democratic qualities of the Israeli regime, which are closely linked, it will be maintained here, to its unique political system and complex political situation. This will be done with a number of illustrations and through references to findings of the latest, as well as previous, Israeli Democracy annual reports. Introduction: In a nutshell—why and how to measure democracy? Since the mid twentieth century, global political discourse has been idolizing democracy. This regime type is widely perceived as the only one which—at least in principle—respects the universally most highly cherished set of human rights and civil rights. Democracy in general and liberal democracy in particular are therefore almost unanimously considered as morally superior to all others regimes, past, present, and perhaps even future. Thus, today, especially in the West but also in other parts of the world, very few dare publicly to foster and legitimize any other form of government even if in fact they ideologically or practically do endorse it.
    [Show full text]