DOCSLIB.ORG

Preventing Water Pollution

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Preventing Water Pollution PREVENTING WATER POLLUTION CITY OF GRAND ISLAND PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT PHONE: 308-385-5444 EXT 270 FAX: 308-385-5488 E-MAIL: [email protected] WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION TIPS FOR THE AUTO REPAIR INDUSTRY. P.O. Box 1968 Box P.O. Grand Island, NE 68802 NE Island, Grand Public Works Department Works Public WHY IS WATER POLLUTION CITY OF GRAND ISLAND PAGE 2 PREVENTION IMPORTANT? PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT PAGE 7 In the past the idea of pollution Why Is Water Pollution Pre- Recycle motor oil, batteries, Keep batteries and chemical prevention was commonly thought vention Important? solvents, paints, oil filters, containers dry and off the of as keeping polluted substances It’s in everyone’s best interest to antifreeze, and lubricants. Be ground to prevent leads into out of the air and water. Commu- reduce the amount of chemicals and nities built sewage treatment plants aware of any materials you stormwater. hazardous substances that flow into and put scrubbers on smokestacks use that are considered haz- the sewer system. It’s good for the Drain and collect fluids from with the hope of reducing released ardous substances, and follow earth, it’s good for our pocket- stored vehicles that are being pollutants. books and it’s good for our com- all regulations related to their dismantled. Reuse or recycle Today, pollution prevention means munities. storage, use or disposal. collected fluids. much more. It means looking at Sanitary Sewers. The fundamen- Keep dust from sanding and every action to determine: Inspect, maintain and clean all tal reason we have to be careful Bondo out of the sewers by: How we can use fewer and less about what goes into sanitary sew- pretreatment equipment reg- harmful substances; ers is that even the best sewage Sweeping up, not hosing ularly. Separators and grease treatment facility has limitations. down, dust; traps should be cleaned at How we can create fewer Nebraska’s sewage treatment sys- least every three months. waste products; tems are designed primarily to han- Allowing debris from wet How we can reuse or recycle dle sanitary sewage. Bacteria pro- sanding to dry out overnight Dry-sweep areas around fuel- substances; and vide “treatment” by breading down before sweeping it up; dispensing islands. organic matter in the water. We What disposal alternatives are avail- need to remember that: Purchasing sanders with an After pollution prevention able to keep these substances out of attached vacuum to reduce techniques, the best way to Treatment facilities can’t treat the sewer systems, landfills, water clean-up time; assure that pollutants stay out bodies and air. many chemicals, so the sub- stances may pass untouched of the sewer system is to in- Many business activities have the Disposing non-hazardous dust into the environment. This in the garbage. vest in a self-contained potential to pollute air, water or threatens fish, wildlife and wastewater recycling system. soil. This booklet focuses on ways vegetation, as well as people Use only as much paint and to prevent water pollution by con- Ultimately, this cuts down using polluted water sources thinner as necessary. Calcu- water and sewer bills and scious reduction, reuse or recycling for drinking or recreation. of chemicals and hazardous sub- late the amount of paint nec- guarantees that businesses are stances. Information about other Some chemicals can destroy essary to cover a surface and not contributing to water types of pollution prevention is the bacteria in the treatment use the best sized spray cup quality problems. available from the Department of process—leaving the facility for the job. When you clean Environmental Quality and your useless. This not only endan- local recycler. gers the environment—it the spray gun, don’t release means a tremendous expense the waste water to either sew- to community ratepayers. er systems. Use an enclosed “gun washer.” WHY IS WATER POLLUTION CITY OF GRAND ISLAND PAGE 6 PREVENTION IMPORTANT? PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT PAGE 3 If the facility receives too disposal and recycling are key Know where your waste water Prevent leaks in solvent tanks; much of one type of waste factors in reducing these risks. goes—does the drain lead to a inspect tanks for leaks and repair at a time, it will not be able How Can pollution Pre- sanitary sewer and a wastewater any immediately. to process the organic mat- treatment facility, or does the vention Help Businesses’ Keep tanks covered when not in ter. Again, this creates en- Bottom Line? water flow directly to a natural use. vironmental hazards, and body of water? In either case, the community may need Many businesses find that tak- Allow cleaned engines and parts you will want to reduce pollu- to invest in greater treat- ing steps to prevent pollution to dry over the hot tank. tants, but if you are sending ment capacity. actually saves money. wastewater directly to a river, Catch fluid from leaking vehicles Chemicals in the sewage Cutting back on chemical stream or lake, you will want to in a drip pan, and use drip pans treatment system put sys- use can reduce material take extra precautions. Direct whenever you are changing flu- tem employees at risk. Ex- costs as well as waste dis- discharge of wastewater without ids in a car. a permit may be illegal. posure to chemicals can posal fees. Recycle wash water from engine cause health problems. Reducing water use means Keep vehicle fluids and other and parts cleaning or exterior Storm Drains. In most Ne- less water down the hazardous wastes out of the sew- washing as much as possible. er systems. Store them in well- braska communities, storm drain—and lower service marked containers for recycling Do not allow wastewater from drains flow directly into rivers fees. or for disposal at an appropriate steam-cleaning to flow into and streams, without passing Reducing chemical use can facility. Be sure not to include storm drains. It must be diverted through a treatment plant. It is create a safer workplace, them with your garbage unless to the sanitary sewer system for this reason that anything with fewer accidents and your waste facility is aware of with proper pretreatment. stormwater runoff is allowed to lower insurance costs. them and approves them. come in contact with will even- Do you need floor drains? If you Ultimately, we will all pay are not washing parts or vehi- tually wash into our local rivers Prevent spills, leaks and drips. and lakes. Improper disposal if we need to build advance Keep oil, grease, solvents and cles, or have other uses for the treatment systems. We all drain, consider plugging the and storage of waste material other chemicals out of storm and creates a very high risk situa- save by keeping harmful sanitary drains. shop floor sewer drains, thereby materials out of our lakes preventing discharges to sewers. tion for contaminating storm- Use solvents only over self con- water runoff. It is everyone’s and tained sinks or tanks. Don’t al- responsibility to be mindful of rivers. low solvents to drip onto the the possible contamination risk floors. their day to day businesses can create. The proper storage, WHY IS WATER POLLUTION CITY OF GRAND ISLAND PAGE 4 PREVENTION IMPORTANT? PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT PAGE 5 Be conscious of chemical use. Store chemicals so they can be ment facilities. Material that Even the least toxic chemicals can be found and identified easily. collects in parking lots—leaves, harmful if used incorrectly. Chemicals Follow manufacturers’ directions mud, rubber from tires, leaked can be dangerous to employees and for all product storage. oil—add to pollution problems customers, as well as to the environ- when collected in rain water or ment. Don’t be careless about any Consider requirements for tem- aspect of chemicals, from initial use to perature, air circulation, length of hosed into storm drains. disposal. time and other storage factors. Responding to environmental Reduce chemical use whenever Make sure products are sealed concerns can be done with sim- possible. properly and stored safely. ple everyday practices. Keeping Many businesses have found that they cars tuned up and by recycling Buy smaller quantities, more fre- Train employees. have saved money by adopting new quently. Avoid purchasing prod- motor oil are just a few. In addi- procedures that require less chemical ucts that won’t be used. All employees—whether or not they tion, the automotive industry use. work with chemicals—should receive has been working aggressively to Provide secondary containment Whenever possible—Substitute. training about the products they may for all liquids. Place original con- reduce its impact on the envi- Many manufacturers are creating new be exposed to. This training should tainers inside a pan, jar or bottle ronment by promoting recycling products with less environmental im- focus on storage requirements, spill capable of capturing all the con- pact. Avoid taking free product sam- procedures and potential hazards. and reuse of chemicals and by tents in case of a leak. Place large ples unless you are certain what’s in promoting other actions that containers on spill control pallets them. keep toxins out of the environ- or totes. Next to our physicians and our Use good housekeeping practic- ment. Yet the sheer number of Spill prevention and control. es. TV repair folks, Americans re- cars on the roads today and Use chemicals only in designated vere their auto mechanics above those receiving repairs and Sweep, vacuum and mop floors areas where spills can be con- all service providers. Service rather than hosing them down, maintenance represents a threat tained. and don’t leave sweepings outside stations and auto repair shops to clean water, so that each per- where rain can wash them into Avoid moving chemicals long are essential to the American son working around automobiles storm drains.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • National Air Quality Status and Trends Through 2007
    National Air Quality STATUS AND TRENDS THROUGH 2007 Printed on 100% recycled/recyclable process chlorine-free paper with 100% post-consumer fiber using vegetable-oil-based ink. National Air Quality STATUS AND TRENDS THROUGH 2007 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Air Quality Assessment Division Research Triangle Park, North Carolina EPA-454/R-08-006 November 2008 Table of Contents Highlights ... 1 Air Pollution ... 4 Six Common Pollutants ... 10 Ground-Level Ozone ... 14 Particle Pollution ... 19 Lead ... 26 Nitrogen Dioxide ... 27 Carbon Monoxide ... 27 Sulfur Dioxide ... 27 Toxic Air Pollutants ... 28 Atmospheric Deposition ... 32 Visibility in Scenic Areas ... 34 Climate Change and Air Quality ... 36 International Transport of Air Pollution ... 38 Terminology ... 40 Web Sites ... 41 HIGHLIGHTS This summary report highlights EPA’s most recent ambient air quality standard (NAAQS). Ground- evaluation of the status and trends in our nation’s air level ozone and particle pollution still present quality. challenges in many areas of the country. LEVELS OF SIX COMMON POLLUTANTS • Though PM2.5 concentrations were higher in 2007 CONTINUE TO DECLINE than in 2006, partly due to weather conditions, annual PM2.5 concentrations were nine percent • Cleaner cars, industries, and consumer products lower in 2007 than in 2001. have contributed to cleaner air for much of the U.S. • 8-hour ozone concentrations were fi ve percent • Since 1990, nationwide air quality for six air lower in 2007 than in 2001. Ozone levels did not pollutants for which there are national standards improve in much of the East until 2002, after has improved signifi cantly.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 7 Pollution Prevention
    This guidance is not a regulatory document and should be considered only informational and supplementary to the MPCA permits (such as the construction storm water general permit or MS4 permit) and local regulations. CHAPTER 7 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 7.00 POLLUTION PREVENTION..............................................................................................7.00-1 7.01 Nonstructural Practices: PLAN DEVELOPMENT.....................................................7.01-1 7.02 Nonstructural Practices: EMPLOYEE TRAINING....................................................7.02-1 7.03 Nonstructural Practices: INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE ............................7.03-1 7.04 Nonstructural Practices: MONITORING AND EVALUATION ...............................7.04-1 7.20 GENERAL PRACTICES.....................................................................................................7.20-1 7.22 General Practices: SPILL PLANS...............................................................................7.22-1 7.23 General Practices: LITTER CONTROL .....................................................................7.23-1 7.24 General Practices: LAWN MANAGEMENT.............................................................7.24-1 7.25 General Practices: DUST CONTROL ........................................................................7.25-1 7.26 General Practices: EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL...................................7.26-1 7.27 General Practices: STREET SWEEPING...................................................................7.27-1
    [Show full text]
  • WHO Guidelines for Indoor Air Quality : Selected Pollutants
    WHO GUIDELINES FOR INDOOR AIR QUALITY WHO GUIDELINES FOR INDOOR AIR QUALITY: WHO GUIDELINES FOR INDOOR AIR QUALITY: This book presents WHO guidelines for the protection of pub- lic health from risks due to a number of chemicals commonly present in indoor air. The substances considered in this review, i.e. benzene, carbon monoxide, formaldehyde, naphthalene, nitrogen dioxide, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (especially benzo[a]pyrene), radon, trichloroethylene and tetrachloroethyl- ene, have indoor sources, are known in respect of their hazard- ousness to health and are often found indoors in concentrations of health concern. The guidelines are targeted at public health professionals involved in preventing health risks of environmen- SELECTED CHEMICALS SELECTED tal exposures, as well as specialists and authorities involved in the design and use of buildings, indoor materials and products. POLLUTANTS They provide a scientific basis for legally enforceable standards. World Health Organization Regional Offi ce for Europe Scherfi gsvej 8, DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark Tel.: +45 39 17 17 17. Fax: +45 39 17 18 18 E-mail: [email protected] Web site: www.euro.who.int WHO guidelines for indoor air quality: selected pollutants The WHO European Centre for Environment and Health, Bonn Office, WHO Regional Office for Europe coordinated the development of these WHO guidelines. Keywords AIR POLLUTION, INDOOR - prevention and control AIR POLLUTANTS - adverse effects ORGANIC CHEMICALS ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE - adverse effects GUIDELINES ISBN 978 92 890 0213 4 Address requests for publications of the WHO Regional Office for Europe to: Publications WHO Regional Office for Europe Scherfigsvej 8 DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark Alternatively, complete an online request form for documentation, health information, or for per- mission to quote or translate, on the Regional Office web site (http://www.euro.who.int/pubrequest).
    [Show full text]
  • An Ounce of Pollution Prevention Is Worth Over 167 Billion* Pounds of Cure: a Decade of Pollution Prevention Results 1990
    2418_historyfinal.qxd 2/3/03 4:38 PM Page 1 January 2003 National Pollution Prevention Roundtable An Ounce of Pollution Prevention is Worth Over 167 Billion* Pounds of Cure: A Decade of Pollution Prevention Results 1990 - 2000 2418_historyfinal.qxd 2/3/03 4:38 PM Page 2 January 28, 2003 Acknowledgements NPPR would like to thank EPA’s John Cross, Acting Produced by the National Pollution Prevention Division Director for U.S. EPA’s Pollution Prevention Roundtable (NPPR) with funding provided by Division, Cindy McComas, Director - Minnesota the United States Environmental Protection Technical Assistance Program (MNTAP) and Ken Agency’s Office of Prevention Pesticides and Zarker, NPPR Board Chair (Texas Commission on Toxics’ Pollution Prevention Division and NPPR. Environmental Quality), for all of their support and input into this seminal document. NPPR hopes that this paper becomes the starting point as well as launching pad for further work measuring pollution prevention successes across the country and globally. This report was researched and prepared by: Steven Spektor, NPPR staff Natalie Roy, NPPR Executive Director P2 Results Advisory Group Co-Advisory Chair Cindy McComas (MNTAP) Co-Advisory Chair Ken Zarker (Texas Commission on Environmental Quality) Melinda Dower, New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJ DEP Terri Goldberg, Northeast Waste Management Officials’ Association (NEWMOA) Tom Natan, National Environmental Trust (NET) On the cover: The National Pollution Prevention Roundtable, The number in the report’s title, 167 billion pounds, a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization, is the largest includes the data from the air, water, waste, combined membership organization in the United States and electricity column of Table 1.4.
    [Show full text]
  • Pollution Prevention
    Unit 4: Pollution Prevention TABLE OF CONTENTS UNIT SUMMARY 1 CERTIFICATION CHECKLIST 2 STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES 10 LESSON PLAN 10 LESSON 1: HOW TO PREVENT POLLUTION AT SCHOOL 11 LESSON 2: CLEAN AND GREEN 19 LESSON 3: PROMOTE POLLUTION PREVENTION AT SCHOOL! 25 MATERIALS NEEDED 26 Unit 4: Pollution Prevention Unit Summary This unit will show your green@school team how to ensure that your school is doing its best to prevent pollution on your school site. Students will learn ways to protect our shared air, water, and soil resources at school and at home. They will also evaluate your school’s practices around a number of potential sources of pollution. Actions 1. Become campus pollutant and chemical detectives—explore your Here are some actions you will take to classrooms, bathrooms, offices, janitorial closets, cupboards, the staff room, complete the green@school checklist and and even the cafeteria kitchen to find potential pollutants and chemicals. reduce your school’s environmental 2. Interview relevant school and district staff to find out what type of impact. products are purchased and how potential pollutants are disposed of or recycled. 3. Investigate existing indoor and outdoor cleaning practices, field management, and pest control methods at your school and evaluate safe practices and where there is room for improvement. 4. Improve existing or implement new pollution prevention practices at your school and/or recommend actions to your district. 5. Determine how well Boltage is working. Find out what alternative transportation practices are in place and how your school can further reduce vehicle emissions. Campaign Opportunities 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Diffuse Pollution, Degraded Waters Emerging Policy Solutions
    Diffuse Pollution, Degraded Waters Emerging Policy Solutions Policy HIGHLIGHTS Diffuse Pollution, Degraded Waters Emerging Policy Solutions “OECD countries have struggled to adequately address diffuse water pollution. It is much easier to regulate large, point source industrial and municipal polluters than engage with a large number of farmers and other land-users where variable factors like climate, soil and politics come into play. But the cumulative effects of diffuse water pollution can be devastating for human well-being and ecosystem health. Ultimately, they can undermine sustainable economic growth. Many countries are trying innovative policy responses with some measure of success. However, these approaches need to be replicated, adapted and massively scaled-up if they are to have an effect.” Simon Upton – OECD Environment Director POLICY H I GH LI GHT S After decades of regulation and investment to reduce point source water pollution, OECD countries still face water quality challenges (e.g. eutrophication) from diffuse agricultural and urban sources of pollution, i.e. pollution from surface runoff, soil filtration and atmospheric deposition. The relative lack of progress reflects the complexities of controlling multiple pollutants from multiple sources, their high spatial and temporal variability, the associated transactions costs, and limited political acceptability of regulatory measures. The OECD report Diffuse Pollution, Degraded Waters: Emerging Policy Solutions (OECD, 2017) outlines the water quality challenges facing OECD countries today. It presents a range of policy instruments and innovative case studies of diffuse pollution control, and concludes with an integrated policy framework to tackle this challenge. An optimal approach will likely entail a mix of policy interventions reflecting the basic OECD principles of water quality management – pollution prevention, treatment at source, the polluter pays and the beneficiary pays principles, equity, and policy coherence.
    [Show full text]
  • Cleaner Production : Basic Principles and Development
    Michael Overcash 1 Cleaner Production : Basic Principles And Development Michael Overcash* *Pollution Prevention Research Center Chemical Engineering Department Raleigh, North Carolina, 27695-7905 Tel :919~515-2325, Fax : 919-515-3465, E-mail :[email protected] ABSTRACT : Cleaner production is of substantial importance in changing the environmental approach within advanced industrialized countries. The critical principles involve fund교 mental understanding of diverse industrial processes, adherence to the easiest techniques of a hierarchy for reducing wastes, and utilization of an underlying thought process to achieve pollution prevention successes that are both technically feasible and cost-effective. Chemical engineering has played a major and unique role in this environmental field. Improving the sustainability of cleaner production will rest on including this subject in the curriculum of university engineering. 1. INTRODUCTION began in U.S. industry and policy during the late 1970's. While examples of improved efficiency and No single dimension of environmental solutions has hence less waste had existed since the start of the captured the imagination of engineers, scientists, policy Industrial Revolution, the distinct explosion of successes -makers, and the public like pollution prevention. In the in pollution prevention did not occur until the 1980's. space of 10 years (1980-1990), the philosophical shift Fig. 1 is an approximate time line of this period [1,2]. and the record of accomplishment have made cleaner The early creation at the 3M Corporation of money production a fundamental means for environmental saving innovations that reduced chemical losses to air, management. This decade began with pollution prevent water, or land was widely publicized [3].
    [Show full text]
  • Guides to Pollution Prevention Municipal Pretreatment Programs EPA/625/R-93/006 October 1993
    United States Office of Research and EPA/625/R-93/O06 Environmental Protection Development October 1993 Agency Washington, DC 20460 Guides to Pollution Prevention Municipal Pretreatment Programs EPA/625/R-93/006 October 1993 Guides to Pollution Prevention: Municipal Pretreatment Programs U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development Center for Environmental Research Information Cincinnati, Ohio Printed on Recycled Paper Notice The information in this document has been funded wholly or in part by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (EPA). This document has been reviewed in accordance with the Agency’s peer and administrative review policies and approved for publication. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. ii Acknowledgments This guide is the product of the efforts of many individuals. Gratitude goes to each person involved in the preparation and review of this guide. Authors Lynn Knight and David Loughran, Eastern Research Group, Inc., Lexington, MA, and Daniel Murray, U.S. EPA, Office of Research and Development, Center for Environmental Research Information were the principal authors of this guide. Technical Contributors The following individuals provided invaluable technical assistance during the development of this guide: Cathy Allen, U.S. EPA, Region V, Chicago, IL Deborah HanIon, U.S. EPA, Office of Research and Development, Washington, DC William Fahey, Massachusetts Water Resources Authority, Boston, MA Eric Renda, Massachusetts
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Pollution Prevention Annual Report 1 February 2021 Order No
    2020 Pollution Prevention Report Wastewater Department THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK FOR COVER Order No. R2-2020-0024, NPDES No. CA0037702 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Order No. R2-2020-0024, NPDES No. CA0037702 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Order No. R2-2020-0024, NPDES No. CA0037702 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. DESCRIPTION OF TREATMENT PLANT AND SERVICE AREA .................................. 1 2. DISCUSSION OF CURRENT POLLUTANTS OF CONCERN .......................................... 3 3. SOURCES OF POLLUTANTS OF CONCERN ................................................................... 3 4. TASKS TO MINIMIZE POLLUTANTS OF CONCERN ..................................................... 4 4.1 Copper Action Plan ......................................................................................................... 6 4.2 Cyanide Action Plan ....................................................................................................... 9 5. OUTREACH TO EMPLOYEES .......................................................................................... 11 5.1 Earth Day ...................................................................................................................... 11 5.2 Green Business Certification ........................................................................................ 11 5.3 Training ......................................................................................................................... 11 5.4 Tours of the Wastewater Treatment Plant ...................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Programs Related to Indoor Pollution by Chemicals
    Federal Programs Related to Indoor Pollution by Chemicals Linda-Jo Schierow Specialist in Environmental Policy David M. Bearden Specialist in Environmental Policy July 23, 2012 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R42620 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Federal Programs Related to Indoor Pollution by Chemicals Summary “Toxic” drywall, formaldehyde emissions, mold, asbestos, lead-based paint, radon, PCBs in caulk, and many other indoor pollution problems have concerned federal policy makers and regulators during the last 30 years. Some problems have been resolved, others remain of concern, and new indoor pollution problems continually emerge. This report describes common indoor pollutants and health effects that have been linked to indoor pollution, federal statutes that have been used to address indoor pollution, key issues, and some general policy options for Congress. Indoor pollutants are chemicals that are potentially harmful to people and found in the habitable portions of buildings, including homes, schools, offices, factories, and other public gathering places. Some indoor pollutants, like lead or ozone, are also outdoor pollutants. Others, like formaldehyde or asbestos, are primarily indoor pollutants. Indoor pollutants may be natural (for example, carbon monoxide or radon) or synthetic (polychlorinated biphenyls [PCBs]), and may originate indoors or outdoors. They may be deliberately produced, naturally occurring, or inadvertent byproducts of human activities. For example, they may arise indoors as uncontrolled emissions from building materials, paints, or furnishings, from evaporation following the use of cleaning supplies or pesticides, or as a combustion byproduct as a result of heating or cooking. Some pollution that originates outdoors infiltrates through porous basements (e.g., radon) or is inadvertently brought into indoor spaces, perhaps through heating or air conditioning systems or in contaminated drinking water.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Report 12/2021: the Polluter Pays Principle: Inconsistent
    EN 2021 121 Special Report The Polluter Pays Principle: Inconsistent application across EU environmental policies and actions 2 Contents Paragraph Executive summary I-V Introduction 01-14 The origins of the Polluter Pays Principle 03-05 The PPP in the EU 06-14 Policy framework 06-09 EU funding 10-14 Audit scope and approach 15-18 Observations 19-68 The PPP underlies EU environmental legislation 19-41 The PPP applies to the most polluting installations but the cost of residual pollution to society remains high 20-25 Waste legislation reflects the PPP, but does not ensure polluters cover the full cost of pollution 26-31 Polluters do not bear the full costs of water pollution 32-38 No overall EU legislative framework to protect against soil pollution 39-41 The Commission’s action plan to improve the operation of the ELD did not achieve the expected results 42-62 Following the evaluation of the ELD, the Commission adopted an action plan to address the gaps identified 43-48 Key ELD concepts remain undefined 49-55 Some Member States require industrial companies to insure against environmental risks 56-62 The EU has financed environmental remediation projects 63-68 EU funds have been used to clean orphan pollution 65-66 EU funds were also used when national authorities failed to enforce environmental legislation and make the polluters pay 67 Lack of financial security to cover environmental liability increases the risk that costs are borne by taxpayers 68 3 Conclusions and recommendations 69-74 Annex Annex I – Sectors covered by the Industrial Emissions Directive Acronyms and abbreviations Glossary Replies of the Commission Audit team Timeline 4 Executive summary I The Polluter Pays Principle is one of the key principles underlying the European Union’s (EU) environmental policy.
    [Show full text]
  • Pollution Prevention Fact Sheet: Animal Waste Collection Page 1 Of
    Pollution Prevention: Animal Waste Collection Page 1 of 4 Pollution Prevention Fact Sheet: Animal Waste Collection download in WordPerfect format here Description Animal waste collection as a pollution source control involves using a combination of educational outreach and enforcement to encourage residents to clean up after their pets. The presence of pet waste in stormwater runoff has a number of implications for urban stream water quality with perhaps the greatest impact from fecal bacteria (for more information see Microbes in Urban Watersheds: Concentrations, Sources and Pathways, Article 17 in The Practice of Watershed Protection). According to recent research, non-human waste represents a significant source of bacterial contamination in urban watersheds. Genetic studies by Alderiso et al. (1996) and Trial et al. (1993) both concluded that 95 percent of the fecal coliform found in urban stormwater was of non-human origin. Bacterial source tracking studies in a watershed in the Seattle, Washington area also found that nearly 20% of the bacteria isolates that could be matched with host animals were matched with dogs. This bacteria can pose health risks to humans and other animals, and result in the spread of disease. It has been estimated that for watersheds of up to twenty-square miles draining to small coastal bays, two to three days of droppings from a population of about 100 dogs would contribute enough bacteria and nutrients to temporarily close a bay to swimming and shellfishing (US EPA, 1993). Pet waste can also be a factor in eutrophication of lakes. The release of nutrients from the decay of pet waste promotes weed and algae growth, limiting light penetration and the growth of aquatic vegetation.
    [Show full text]