Princeton Lectures in Analysis by Elias M

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Princeton Lectures in Analysis by Elias M Princeton Lectures in Analysis by Elias M. Stein and Rami Shakarchi—A Book Review Reviewed by Charles Fefferman and Robert Fefferman with contributions from Paul Hagelstein, Nataša Pavlovi´c, and Lillian Pierce Comments by Charles Fefferman and Robert us, ready to be discovered. Eli turns us into research Fefferman mathematicians by encouraging us to become active For the last ten years, Eli Stein and Rami Shakarchi participants in the process. have undertaken a labor of love, producing a se- Many who have not enjoyed the privilege of study- quence of intensive undergraduate analysis courses ing under Stein or collaborating with him have nev- and an accompanying set of four books, called the ertheless benefited greatly by studying from his clas- Princeton Lectures in Analysis. The individual titles sic books Singular Integrals, Introduction to Fourier are: Analysis in Euclidean Spaces (with Guido Weiss), and • Fourier Analysis: An Introduction Harmonic Analysis. People far removed from Prince- • Complex Analysis ton have been able to read those books and then go • Real Analysis: Measure Theory, Integration, on to do significant work. Eli succeeded in putting and Hilbert Spaces on the printed page the kernel of what he conveyed and as a teacher and research collaborator. • Functional Analysis: Introduction to Further Before proceeding further, we should say a few Topics in Analysis. words about Rami Shakarchi. Shakarchi is a remark- All four books are now available; all four books able man in his own right. He is, among other things, bear the unmistakable imprint of Eli Stein. a passionate and accomplished pilot. He is now an Every mathematician knows Stein as an analyst active worker in the financial sector. As a graduate of unsurpassed originality and impact. A few dozen student, Rami volunteered to help Eli to plan the of us have had the privilege of writing a Ph.D. the- sequence of courses and to write the four books. sis under his supervision. We know firsthand how The collaboration was a great success. Eli and Eli conveys the essential unity of many seemingly Rami got along famously and communicated per- disparate ideas. To him, analysis is always an or- fectly. Rami earned his Ph.D. under one of us (CF) ganic whole. Even more remarkably, his own enthusi- and took a demanding finance job in London. Even asm for the subject instills great optimism in all who when his firm, Lehman Brothers, declared bank- learn from him. First-rate math is right in front of ruptcy, he stayed with the Stein project and saw it through to the end. Charles Fefferman is the Herbert Jones University Pro- The Stein-Shakarchi books constitute an extra- fessor of Mathematics at Princeton University. His email ordinary achievement. They are accessible (with address is [email protected]. a lot of work) to any math student who has had Robert Fefferman is the Max Mason Distinguished Service a rigorous one-variable calculus course and a lit- Professor of Mathematics at the University of Chicago. His tle linear algebra, yet they cover an astonishing email address is [email protected]. range of material, including (in alphabetical order) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1090/noti832 Brownian motion, the Brunn-Minkowski inequality, May 2012 Notices of the AMS 641 Dirichlet’s principle, Dirichlet’s theorem on primes at once more geometric and more abstract: a in an arithmetic progression, elliptic functions, the clearer understanding of the nature of curves, ergodic theorem (maximal, mean, and pointwise), their rectifiability and their extent; also the the gamma function, the Hardy-Littlewood maximal beginnings of the theory of sets, starting with theorem, Hausdorff dimension, the isoperimetric subsets of the line, the plane, etc., and the inequality, the Kakeya problem, the partition func- “measure” that could be assigned to each. tion, the prime number theorem, representations One sees here the vast and penetrating scope of of positive integers as sums of two squares and Stein’s view of analysis and how he is able to weave as sums of four squares, the Riemann zeta func- it into his teaching. tion, the Runge approximation theorem, Stirling’s The question remains, of course, how such an formula, theta functions, and a lot more. ambitious set of books can work in practice. To Moreover, these topics ap- answer this query, we asked Paul Hagelstein, Nataša pear, not as a zoo of isolated Pavlovi´c, and Lillian Pierce to comment on their wonders, but quite naturally as own experiences. Paul taught the Stein-Shakarchi part of a unified picture. For courses as a VIGRE postdoc. Nataša taught Complex instance, results from analytic Variables à la Stein-Shakarchi at Princeton. Lillian number theory and probability took the Stein-Shakarchi courses as an undergradu- give the books a relevance that ate, then went on to serve as a TA for Nataša’s class. reaches beyond analysis to other We are grateful to Paul, Nataša, and Lillian for their branches of mathematics and thoughtful comments, which appear below. science. It remains for us only to add that, in our view, the The material is explained with Stein-Shakarchi books will be immensely valuable the perfect clarity, focus on es- for any undergraduate or graduate math student, sentials, and stress upon the for a wide audience of working mathematicians, and interconnection of ideas that one for many science or engineering students and re- expects from Eli Stein. Numerous challenging searchers with a mathematical bent. Even those few problems encourage active audience participation. mathematicians who thoroughly know the contents By working the problems, the student earns an of all four books will find pleasure in the beauty of understanding of key ideas. their unified presentation of a vast subject. Another remarkable feature of the Stein-Shakarchi books is that they take very seriously the historical Comments by Lillian B. Pierce development of analysis. The authors boldly present The Courses Fourier analysis before passing from the Riemann to the Lebesgue integral. This makes it possible for In the fall of 1999 a murmur spread through the the student to start doing interesting mathematics community of math students at Princeton: a new right away, without getting bogged down in unmo- course would be offered in the spring, the first of tivated technicalities. When the time comes to start four intensive courses in analysis, taught by Profes- discussing measure and integration, the subject is sor Elias M. Stein. Professor Stein had already ac- introduced with the following words: quired status in our eyes, as it happened that most of my cohort had taken his Introduction to Single Starting in about 1870, a revolutionary change Variable Real Analysis course in our first semester in the conceptual framework of analysis began at Princeton. So as the rumor of the new course rum- to take shape, one that ultimately led to a vast bled through our ranks, it was clear that we’d all sign transformation and generalization of the un- up for it. It was also clear from the first lectures that derstanding of such basic objects as functions, we were in for something unlike anything we’d ever and such notions as continuity, differentiabil- experienced before. ity and integrability. At the beginning of each of the four courses, Pro- The earlier view that relevant functions fessor Stein started by saying that he would work in analysis were given by formulas or other very hard on the course and that the course would in “analytic” expressions, that these functions turn require us to work very hard. Then he expressed were by their nature continuous (or nearly so), his gratitude, ahead of time, for all our ensuing hard that by necessity such functions had deriva- work. This was a striking attitude of enfranchise- tives at most points, and moreover these ment, which I certainly never encountered in any were integrable by the accepted methods of other course. integration—all of these ideas began to give Indeed, we did have to work hard. Of course, way under the weight of various examples substantial courses in mathematics are often de- and problems that arose in the subject, which scribed as “hard”, and this superficial descriptor could not be ignored and required new con- can conceal a multitude of sins or blessings. Are cepts to be understood. Parallel with these the lectures simply unclear, the assigned problems developments came new insights that were ill chosen? Or are the lectures deeply insightful, 642 Notices of the AMS Volume 59, Number 5 the assigned problems a methodology for building of individual mathematicians (while avoiding a a versatile toolbox? In this analysis sequence, the digression into blow-by-blow timelines). lectures were fluid and painstakingly prepared; they Looking back, I realize that we students did not possessed Stein’s trademark of logical progressions feel that we were merely inputting stale mathemat- of big ideas blended with clarifying close-up exam- ics into our heads; the beautiful presentations in the inations. In particular, he was careful to lift each lectures and the intense work on the problem sets concept up from first principles, so that we could made us feel like we were part of a creative force, start from our existing knowledge (as second-year (re)discovering mathematics. I am sure we had this undergraduates) and follow him deeply into the sense of creation partly because material. It was as though he was successfully accel- the courses were being devel- erating a car full of passengers, having first checked oped into books, but I think that all our seatbelts were fastened! that it also came from the re- The problem sets were memorably substantial spect given to the work we were (one group of students estimated that they some- doing, conveyed by the high stan- times spent about thirty hours per week on the dards and high expectations of courses).
Recommended publications
  • 2006 Annual Report
    Contents Clay Mathematics Institute 2006 James A. Carlson Letter from the President 2 Recognizing Achievement Fields Medal Winner Terence Tao 3 Persi Diaconis Mathematics & Magic Tricks 4 Annual Meeting Clay Lectures at Cambridge University 6 Researchers, Workshops & Conferences Summary of 2006 Research Activities 8 Profile Interview with Research Fellow Ben Green 10 Davar Khoshnevisan Normal Numbers are Normal 15 Feature Article CMI—Göttingen Library Project: 16 Eugene Chislenko The Felix Klein Protocols Digitized The Klein Protokolle 18 Summer School Arithmetic Geometry at the Mathematisches Institut, Göttingen, Germany 22 Program Overview The Ross Program at Ohio State University 24 PROMYS at Boston University Institute News Awards & Honors 26 Deadlines Nominations, Proposals and Applications 32 Publications Selected Articles by Research Fellows 33 Books & Videos Activities 2007 Institute Calendar 36 2006 Another major change this year concerns the editorial board for the Clay Mathematics Institute Monograph Series, published jointly with the American Mathematical Society. Simon Donaldson and Andrew Wiles will serve as editors-in-chief, while I will serve as managing editor. Associate editors are Brian Conrad, Ingrid Daubechies, Charles Fefferman, János Kollár, Andrei Okounkov, David Morrison, Cliff Taubes, Peter Ozsváth, and Karen Smith. The Monograph Series publishes Letter from the president selected expositions of recent developments, both in emerging areas and in older subjects transformed by new insights or unifying ideas. The next volume in the series will be Ricci Flow and the Poincaré Conjecture, by John Morgan and Gang Tian. Their book will appear in the summer of 2007. In related publishing news, the Institute has had the complete record of the Göttingen seminars of Felix Klein, 1872–1912, digitized and made available on James Carlson.
    [Show full text]
  • Complex Analysis (Princeton Lectures in Analysis, Volume
    COMPLEX ANALYSIS Ibookroot October 20, 2007 Princeton Lectures in Analysis I Fourier Analysis: An Introduction II Complex Analysis III Real Analysis: Measure Theory, Integration, and Hilbert Spaces Princeton Lectures in Analysis II COMPLEX ANALYSIS Elias M. Stein & Rami Shakarchi PRINCETON UNIVERSITY PRESS PRINCETON AND OXFORD Copyright © 2003 by Princeton University Press Published by Princeton University Press, 41 William Street, Princeton, New Jersey 08540 In the United Kingdom: Princeton University Press, 6 Oxford Street, Woodstock, Oxfordshire OX20 1TW All Rights Reserved Library of Congress Control Number 2005274996 ISBN 978-0-691-11385-2 British Library Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available The publisher would like to acknowledge the authors of this volume for providing the camera-ready copy from which this book was printed Printed on acid-free paper. ∞ press.princeton.edu Printed in the United States of America 5 7 9 10 8 6 To my grandchildren Carolyn, Alison, Jason E.M.S. To my parents Mohamed & Mireille and my brother Karim R.S. Foreword Beginning in the spring of 2000, a series of four one-semester courses were taught at Princeton University whose purpose was to present, in an integrated manner, the core areas of analysis. The objective was to make plain the organic unity that exists between the various parts of the subject, and to illustrate the wide applicability of ideas of analysis to other fields of mathematics and science. The present series of books is an elaboration of the lectures that were given. While there are a number of excellent texts dealing with individual parts of what we cover, our exposition aims at a different goal: pre- senting the various sub-areas of analysis not as separate disciplines, but rather as highly interconnected.
    [Show full text]
  • Fefferman and Schoen Awarded 2017 Wolf Prize in Mathematics
    COMMUNICATION Fefferman and Schoen Awarded 2017 Wolf Prize in Mathematics Biographical Sketch: Charles Fefferman Charles Fefferman was born in Washington, DC, in 1949. Showing exceptional ability in mathematics as a child, he entered the University of Maryland in 1963, at the age of fourteen, having bypassed high school. He published his first mathematics paper in a journal at the age of fifteen. In 1966, at the age of seventeen, he received his BS in mathematics and physics and was awarded a three-year NSF fellowship for research. He received his PhD from Princeton University in 1969 under the direction of Elias Stein. After spending the year 1969–1970 as a lecturer at Princeton, he accepted an assistant professorship at the University of Chicago. He was promoted to full professor in 1971—the youngest full professor ever appointed in Charles Fefferman Richard Schoen the United States. He returned to Princeton in 1973. He has been the recipient of a Sloan Foundation Fellowship Charles Fefferman of Princeton University and Richard (1970) and a NATO Postdoctoral Fellowship (1971). He Schoen of the University of California, Irvine, have been was awarded the Fields Medal in 1978. His many awards awarded the 2017 Wolf Prize in Mathematics by the Wolf and prizes include the Salem Prize (1971); the inaugural Foundation. Alan T. Waterman Award (1976); the Bergman Prize (1992); The prize citation reads: “Charles Fefferman has made and the Bôcher Memorial Prize of the AMS (2008). He was major contributions to several fields, including several elected to the American Academy of Arts and Sciences in complex variables, partial differential equations and 1972, the National Academy of Sciences in 1979, and the subelliptic problems.
    [Show full text]
  • Preserving the Unity of Mathematics CONTENTS
    ICMAT Newsletter #13 Autumn 2016 CSIC - UAM - UC3M - UCM EDITORIAL After the last European Congress of Mathematics, held between July 18th and July 22nd in Berlin, Marta Sanz-Solé, professor at the University of Barcelona, speaks about the European Mathematical Society, of which she was the Chair person between 2010 a 2014. The ECM: Preserving the Unity of Mathematics Less than one year ago, in October, 2015, the European Mathe- matical Society (EMS) celebrated its 25th anniversary. The place chosen to commemorate the event was the Institut Henri Poin- caré, the home of mathematics and theoretical physics in Paris since 1928. In that same year, the London Mathematical Soci- ety, one of the oldest mathematical societies in Europe, cele- brated its 150th anniversary, while many other societies have recently commemorated their 100th anniversary or are about to Rascon Image: Fernando do so. This difference in age may give rise to certain complexes, although there is no reason why this should happen. The EMS has enjoyed great success during its short existence, thanks to the well-defined space it occupies in a world that is advancing rapidly towards globalization, and the exclusively international scenario in which it carries out its functions. The conception and creation of the EMS in 1990 is better under- stood in the political context of Europe that arose after the tragic experience of World War II. In 1958, the communitary structure that currently underpins the Europan Union (EU) was estab- CONTENTS lished, on the basis of which the identity of Europe has been con- solidated, and the project, initially focused on the economy, has evolved along all fronts that affect the lives of those belonging Editorial: Marta Sanz-Solé (University of to the member states; in particular, education, research and in- Barcelona)..............................................................1 novation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Legacy of Norbert Wiener: a Centennial Symposium
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1090/pspum/060 Selected Titles in This Series 60 David Jerison, I. M. Singer, and Daniel W. Stroock, Editors, The legacy of Norbert Wiener: A centennial symposium (Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, October 1994) 59 William Arveson, Thomas Branson, and Irving Segal, Editors, Quantization, nonlinear partial differential equations, and operator algebra (Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, June 1994) 58 Bill Jacob and Alex Rosenberg, Editors, K-theory and algebraic geometry: Connections with quadratic forms and division algebras (University of California, Santa Barbara, July 1992) 57 Michael C. Cranston and Mark A. Pinsky, Editors, Stochastic analysis (Cornell University, Ithaca, July 1993) 56 William J. Haboush and Brian J. Parshall, Editors, Algebraic groups and their generalizations (Pennsylvania State University, University Park, July 1991) 55 Uwe Jannsen, Steven L. Kleiman, and Jean-Pierre Serre, Editors, Motives (University of Washington, Seattle, July/August 1991) 54 Robert Greene and S. T. Yau, Editors, Differential geometry (University of California, Los Angeles, July 1990) 53 James A. Carlson, C. Herbert Clemens, and David R. Morrison, Editors, Complex geometry and Lie theory (Sundance, Utah, May 1989) 52 Eric Bedford, John P. D'Angelo, Robert E. Greene, and Steven G. Krantz, Editors, Several complex variables and complex geometry (University of California, Santa Cruz, July 1989) 51 William B. Arveson and Ronald G. Douglas, Editors, Operator theory/operator algebras and applications (University of New Hampshire, July 1988) 50 James Glimm, John Impagliazzo, and Isadore Singer, Editors, The legacy of John von Neumann (Hofstra University, Hempstead, New York, May/June 1988) 49 Robert C. Gunning and Leon Ehrenpreis, Editors, Theta functions - Bowdoin 1987 (Bowdoin College, Brunswick, Maine, July 1987) 48 R.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report for the Fiscal Year July 1, 1980
    The Institute for Advanced Study .nnual Report 1980 This Annual Report has been made possible by a generous grant from the Union Carbide Corporation. ! The Institute for Advanced Study Annual Report for the Fiscal Year July 1, 1980-June 30, 1981 The Institute for Advanced Study Olden Lane Princeton, New Jersey 08540 U.S.A. Printed by Princeton University Press Designed by Bruce Campbell x4S36 /98I It is fundamental to our purpose, and our Extract from the letter addressed by the express desire, that in the appointments to Founders to the Institute's Trustees, the staff and faculty, as well as in the dated June 6, 1930, Newark, New Jersey. admission of workers and students, no account shall be taken, directly or indirectly, of race, religion or sex. We feel strongly that the spirit characteristic of America at its noblest, above all, the pursuit of higher learning, cannot admit of any conditions as to personnel other than those designed to promote the objects for which this institution is established, and particularly with no regard whatever to accidents of race, creed or sex. /r2- S39 Table of Contents Trustees and Officers Founders Caroline Bamberger Fuld Louis Bamberger Board of Trustees Daniel Bell Howard C. Kauffmann Professor of Sociology President Harvard University Exxon Corporation Charles L. Brown John R. Opel Chairman the Board of and Chief President and Chief Executive Officer Executive Officer IBM Corporation American Telephone and Telegraph Company Howard C. Petersen Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Fletcher L. Byrom Chairman of the Board Martin E. Segal Koppers Company, Inc. Partner, Wertheim & Co.; Chairman, Martin E.
    [Show full text]
  • Science Lives: Video Portraits of Great Mathematicians
    Science Lives: Video Portraits of Great Mathematicians accompanied by narrative profiles written by noted In mathematics, beauty is a very impor- mathematics biographers. tant ingredient… The aim of a math- Hugo Rossi, director of the Science Lives project, ematician is to encapsulate as much as said that the first criterion for choosing a person you possibly can in small packages—a to profile is the significance of his or her contribu- high density of truth per unit word. tions in “creating new pathways in mathematics, And beauty is a criterion. If you’ve got a theoretical physics, and computer science.” A beautiful result, it means you’ve got an secondary criterion is an engaging personality. awful lot identified in a small compass. With two exceptions (Atiyah and Isadore Singer), the Science Lives videos are not interviews; rather, —Michael Atiyah they are conversations between the subject of the video and a “listener”, typically a close friend or colleague who is knowledgeable about the sub- Hearing Michael Atiyah discuss the role of beauty ject’s impact in mathematics. The listener works in mathematics is akin to reading Euclid in the together with Rossi and the person being profiled original: You are going straight to the source. The to develop a list of topics and a suggested order in quotation above is taken from a video of Atiyah which they might be discussed. “But, as is the case made available on the Web through the Science with all conversations, there usually is a significant Lives project of the Simons Foundation. Science amount of wandering in and out of interconnected Lives aims to build an archive of information topics, which is desirable,” said Rossi.
    [Show full text]
  • Letter from the Chair Celebrating the Lives of John and Alicia Nash
    Spring 2016 Issue 5 Department of Mathematics Princeton University Letter From the Chair Celebrating the Lives of John and Alicia Nash We cannot look back on the past Returning from one of the crowning year without first commenting on achievements of a long and storied the tragic loss of John and Alicia career, John Forbes Nash, Jr. and Nash, who died in a car accident on his wife Alicia were killed in a car their way home from the airport last accident on May 23, 2015, shock- May. They were returning from ing the department, the University, Norway, where John Nash was and making headlines around the awarded the 2015 Abel Prize from world. the Norwegian Academy of Sci- ence and Letters. As a 1994 Nobel Nash came to Princeton as a gradu- Prize winner and a senior research ate student in 1948. His Ph.D. thesis, mathematician in our department “Non-cooperative games” (Annals for many years, Nash maintained a of Mathematics, Vol 54, No. 2, 286- steady presence in Fine Hall, and he 95) became a seminal work in the and Alicia are greatly missed. Their then-fledgling field of game theory, life and work was celebrated during and laid the path for his 1994 Nobel a special event in October. Memorial Prize in Economics. After finishing his Ph.D. in 1950, Nash This has been a very busy and pro- held positions at the Massachusetts ductive year for our department, and Institute of Technology and the In- we have happily hosted conferences stitute for Advanced Study, where 1950s Nash began to suffer from and workshops that have attracted the breadth of his work increased.
    [Show full text]
  • January 2001 Prizes and Awards
    January 2001 Prizes and Awards 4:25 p.m., Thursday, January 11, 2001 PROGRAM OPENING REMARKS Thomas F. Banchoff, President Mathematical Association of America LEROY P. S TEELE PRIZE FOR MATHEMATICAL EXPOSITION American Mathematical Society DEBORAH AND FRANKLIN TEPPER HAIMO AWARDS FOR DISTINGUISHED COLLEGE OR UNIVERSITY TEACHING OF MATHEMATICS Mathematical Association of America RUTH LYTTLE SATTER PRIZE American Mathematical Society FRANK AND BRENNIE MORGAN PRIZE FOR OUTSTANDING RESEARCH IN MATHEMATICS BY AN UNDERGRADUATE STUDENT American Mathematical Society Mathematical Association of America Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics CHAUVENET PRIZE Mathematical Association of America LEVI L. CONANT PRIZE American Mathematical Society ALICE T. S CHAFER PRIZE FOR EXCELLENCE IN MATHEMATICS BY AN UNDERGRADUATE WOMAN Association for Women in Mathematics LEROY P. S TEELE PRIZE FOR SEMINAL CONTRIBUTION TO RESEARCH American Mathematical Society LEONARD M. AND ELEANOR B. BLUMENTHAL AWARD FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF RESEARCH IN PURE MATHEMATICS Leonard M. and Eleanor B. Blumenthal Trust for the Advancement of Mathematics COMMUNICATIONS AWARD Joint Policy Board for Mathematics ALBERT LEON WHITEMAN MEMORIAL PRIZE American Mathematical Society CERTIFICATES OF MERITORIOUS SERVICE Mathematical Association of America LOUISE HAY AWARD FOR CONTRIBUTIONS TO MATHEMATICS EDUCATION Association for Women in Mathematics OSWALD VEBLEN PRIZE IN GEOMETRY American Mathematical Society YUEH-GIN GUNG AND DR. CHARLES Y. H U AWARD FOR DISTINGUISHED SERVICE TO MATHEMATICS Mathematical Association of America LEROY P. S TEELE PRIZE FOR LIFETIME ACHIEVEMENT American Mathematical Society CLOSING REMARKS Felix E. Browder, President American Mathematical Society M THE ATI A CA M L ΤΡΗΤΟΣ ΜΗ N ΕΙΣΙΤΩ S A O C C I I R E E T ΑΓΕΩΜΕ Y M A F O 8 U 88 AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY NDED 1 LEROY P.
    [Show full text]
  • Fall 2011 Contents
    FALL 2011 Contents n TRADE 1 n NATURAL HISTORy 24 n ACADEMIC TRADE 31 n PAPERBACKS 43 n RELIGION 72 n EUROPEAN HISTORy 75 n HISTORY 76 n AMERICAN HISTORy 80 n ANCIENT HISTORy 81 n CLASSICs 82 n LITERATURe 82 n CHINESE LANGUAGE 85 n ART 88 n MUSIC 89 n PHILOSOPHy 90 n LAW 92 n POLITICS 93 n POLITICAL SCIENCE 95 n ANTHROPOLOGY 100 n SOCIOLOGY 103 n SOCIAL SCIENCE 107 n ECONOMICS 107 n MATHEMATICs 112 n ENGINEERINg 114 n PHYSICs 115 n EARTH SCIENCe 117 n BIOLOGY 118 n ECOLOGY 120 n RECENT & BEST-sELLING TITLES 121 n AUTHOR / TITLE INDEx 124 n ORDER INFORMATION Trade 1 The Darwin Economy Liberty, Competition, and the Common Good WHAT CHARLES DARWIN CAN TEACH US ABOUT BUILDING A FAIRER SOCIETY Robert H. Frank Who was the greater economist—Adam Smith or Charles Darwin? The question seems absurd. Darwin, after all, was a naturalist, not an economist. But Robert Frank, New York Times economics columnist and best-selling author of The Economic Naturalist, predicts that within the next century Darwin will un- seat Smith as the intellectual founder of economics. The reason, Frank argues, is that Darwin’s understanding of competition describes economic reality far more accurately than Smith’s. And the consequences of this fact are profound. Indeed, the failure to recognize that we live in Darwin’s world rather than Smith’s is putting us all at risk by preventing us from seeing that competition alone will not solve our problems. Smith’s theory of the invisible hand, which says that competition channels self-interest for the common good, is probably the most widely cited argument today in favor of unbridled competition—and against regulation, taxation, and even government itself.
    [Show full text]
  • Fitting a Putative Manifold to Noisy Data
    Proceedings of Machine Learning Research vol 75:1–32, 2018 31st Annual Conference on Learning Theory Fitting a putative manifold to noisy data Charles Fefferman [email protected] Princeton University, Mathematics Department, Fine Hall, Washington Road, Princeton NJ, 08544-1000, USA. Sergei Ivanov [email protected] Steklov Institute of Mathematics, Russian Academy of Sciences, 27 Fontanka, 191023 St.Petersburg, Russia. Yaroslav Kurylev [email protected] University College London, Department of Mathematics, Gower Street WC1E 6BT, London, UK. Matti Lassas [email protected] University of Helsinki, Department of Mathematics and Statistics, P.O. Box 68, 00014, Helsinki, Finland. Hariharan Narayanan [email protected] School of Technology and Computer Science, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Homi Bhabha Road, Mumbai 400 005, INDIA Editors: Sebastien Bubeck, Vianney Perchet and Philippe Rigollet Abstract In the present work, we give a solution to the following question from manifold learning. Sup- pose data belonging to a high dimensional Euclidean space is drawn independently, identically distributed from a measure supported on a low dimensional twice differentiable embedded mani- fold M, and corrupted by a small amount of gaussian noise. How can we produce a manifold Mo whose Hausdorff distance to M is small and whose reach is not much smaller than the reach of M? Keywords: Manifold learning, Hausdorff distance, reach 1. Introduction One of the main challenges in high dimensional data analysis is dealing with the exponential growth of the computational and sample complexity of generic inference tasks as a function of dimension, a phenomenon termed “the curse of dimensionality”.
    [Show full text]
  • NEWSLETTER Issue: 492 - January 2021
    i “NLMS_492” — 2020/12/21 — 10:40 — page 1 — #1 i i i NEWSLETTER Issue: 492 - January 2021 RUBEL’S MATHEMATICS FOUR PROBLEM AND DECADES INDEPENDENCE ON i i i i i “NLMS_492” — 2020/12/21 — 10:40 — page 2 — #2 i i i EDITOR-IN-CHIEF COPYRIGHT NOTICE Eleanor Lingham (Sheeld Hallam University) News items and notices in the Newsletter may [email protected] be freely used elsewhere unless otherwise stated, although attribution is requested when EDITORIAL BOARD reproducing whole articles. Contributions to the Newsletter are made under a non-exclusive June Barrow-Green (Open University) licence; please contact the author or David Chillingworth (University of Southampton) photographer for the rights to reproduce. Jessica Enright (University of Glasgow) The LMS cannot accept responsibility for the Jonathan Fraser (University of St Andrews) accuracy of information in the Newsletter. Views Jelena Grbic´ (University of Southampton) expressed do not necessarily represent the Cathy Hobbs (UWE) views or policy of the Editorial Team or London Christopher Hollings (Oxford) Mathematical Society. Robb McDonald (University College London) Adam Johansen (University of Warwick) Susan Oakes (London Mathematical Society) ISSN: 2516-3841 (Print) Andrew Wade (Durham University) ISSN: 2516-385X (Online) Mike Whittaker (University of Glasgow) DOI: 10.1112/NLMS Andrew Wilson (University of Glasgow) Early Career Content Editor: Jelena Grbic´ NEWSLETTER WEBSITE News Editor: Susan Oakes Reviews Editor: Christopher Hollings The Newsletter is freely available electronically at lms.ac.uk/publications/lms-newsletter. CORRESPONDENTS AND STAFF LMS/EMS Correspondent: David Chillingworth MEMBERSHIP Policy Digest: John Johnston Joining the LMS is a straightforward process. For Production: Katherine Wright membership details see lms.ac.uk/membership.
    [Show full text]