DOCSLIB.ORG

Un Human Rights Council Tenth Session Compilation of Statements by Amnesty International

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Un Human Rights Council Tenth Session Compilation of Statements by Amnesty International UN HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL TENTH SESSION COMPILATION OF STATEMENTS BY AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL Amnesty International Publications First published in 2009 by Amnesty International Publications International Secretariat Peter Benenson House 1 Easton Street London WC1X 0DW United Kingdom www.amnesty.org Copyright Amnesty International Publications 2008 Index: IOR 41/011/2009 Original Language: English Printed by Amnesty International, International Secretariat, United Kingdom All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior permission of the publishers. Cover photo: UN Human Rights Council tenth session Amnesty International Amnesty International is a global movement of 2.2 million people in more than 150 countries and territories, who campaign on human rights. Our vision is for every person to enjoy all the rights enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and other international human rights instruments. We research, campaign, advocate and mobilize to end abuses of human rights. Amnesty International is independent of any government, political ideology, economic interest or religion. Our work is largely financed by contributions from our membership and donations CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 5 ITEM 2 – ANNUAL REPORT OF THE UN HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS ..... 6 Question for the inter-active dialogue with, Navi Pillay, UN High Commissioner for Human Rights on her Annual Report (Special procedures; Sri Lanka; expert seminar on articles 19 and 20 of the ICCPR) – 5 March 2009 ........................................................................ 6 Oral statement by Amnesty International on the High Commissioner’s report on Colombia - 25 March 2009 ........................................................................................................ 7 ITEM 3 – PROMOTION AND PROTECTION OF ALL HUMAN RIGHTS ................................ 9 Question for the inter-active dialogue with the Chairperson of the Working Group on Arbitrary Detention: joint intervention with the Friends World Committee for Consultation (Quakers) (Human rights of persons deprived of their liberty) - 6 March 2009 ................. 9 Question for the Panel Discussion on the Realization of the Right to Food (expulsion of international humanitarian NGOs from Darfur, Sudan) – 9 March 2009 ....................... 10 Question for the interactive dialogue with, Ms. Raquel Rolnik, the Special Rapporteur on adequate housing as a component of the right to an adequate standard of living, and on the right to non-discrimination in this context (Impact of the housing, financial and economic crises on the right to adequate housing; Canada; Cambodia; Angola) - 10 March 2009 ..................................................................................................................... 11 Question for the inter-active dialogue with, Manfred Nowak, the Special Rapporteur on torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment and, Mr. Martin Scheinin, the Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of human rights while countering terrorism (Death penalty; Thailand; Spain) - undelivered contribution .......... 12 Question for the inter-active dialogue with, Ms. Asma Jahangir, the Special Rapporteur on freedom of religion or belief, Asma Jahangir and the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights defenders, Margaret Sekaggya (Turkmenistan; Human rights defenders in the Middle East and North Africa) - 2 March 2009 ........................................................... 14 Question for the inter-active dialogue with, Mr. Walter Kälin, the Representative of the Secretary-General on the Human Rights of Internally Displaced Persons (Sri Lanka) – 13 March 2009 ........................................................................................................... 15 ITEM 4 – HUMAN RIGHTS SITUATIONS THAT REQUIRE THE COUNCIL’S ATTENTION ... 17 Amnesty International’s written statement on the human rights situation in Colombia . ... 17 Question for the inter-active dialogue on the follow-up to the special session on The situation of the human rights in the East of the Democratic Republic of the Congo - 17 March 2009 ............................................................................................................ 20 Oral intervention on the general debate on item 4 (Iran, China, USA) -17 March 2009 ... 22 ITEM 5 – HUMAN RIGHTS BODIES AND MECHANISMS ................................................ 24 Joint statement on behalf of Amnesty International, Asian Forum for Human Rights and Development (FORUM-ASIA), Cairo Institute for Human Rights Studies (CIHRS), Franciscans International, Lutheran World Federation and World Organization against Torture (OMCT) (Reprisals against those cooperating with the UN) – 23 March 2009 ..... 24 ITEM 6 – UNIVERSAL PERIODIC REVIEW..................................................................... 26 Written Statement on Colombia in relation to the Universal Periodic Review ................. 26 Oral intervention on the Bahamas - 18 March 2009 .................................................... 29 Oral Intervention on Burundi -18 March 2009 ............................................................ 30 Oral Intervention on Montenegro -18 March 2009 ....................................................... 31 Oral Intervention on Israel - 19 March 2009............................................................... 32 Oral Intervention on Liechtenstein – 19 March 2009................................................... 33 Oral Intervention on Serbia – 19 March 2009 ............................................................. 34 Oral Intervention on Turkmenistan-19 March 2009 ..................................................... 34 Oral Intervention on Colombia – 20 March 2009......................................................... 35 Oral Intervention on Uzbekistan – 20 March 2009 ...................................................... 37 Oral Intervention on Tuvalu – 20 March 2009 ............................................................ 38 UPR general debate: Oral statement - 20 March 2009 ................................................ 38 ITEM 9 – RACISM AND OTHER RELATED FORMS OF INTOLERANCE. ............................ 40 Oral intervention on the durban Review conference – 24 March 2009 ........................... 40 UN Human Rights Council tenth session 5 Compilation of statements by Amnesty Interntaional INTRODUCTION The following statements were made by Amnesty International during the tenth session of the United Nations Human Rights Council which took place from 2 to 27 March 2009. This compilation also includes joint oral statements and public statements. All video links of oral statements have been extracted from the United Nations Webcast1. UPR oral statements in this compilation reflect the statements as delivered at the Human Rights Council. The full text of each oral statement is posted on the extranet page of the UN Human Rights Council.2 It can also be found under the country’s section on our website.3 Index: IOR 41/011/2009 Amnesty International April 2009 6 UN Human Rights Council tenth session Compilation of statements by Amnesty Internatiomal ITEM 2 – ANNUAL REPORT OF THE UN HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS4 QUESTION FOR THE INTER-ACTIVE DIALOGUE WITH, NAVI PILLAY, UN HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS ON HER ANNUAL REPORT (SPECIAL PROCEDURES; SRI LANKA; EXPERT SEMINAR ON ARTICLES 19 AND 20 OF THE ICCPR) – 5 MARCH 2009 Videolink: http://webcast.un.org/ramgen/ondemand/conferences/unhrc/tenth/hrc090305pm- eng.rm?start=02:13:10&end=02:16:21 Delivered by Peter Splinter Thank you Mr. President, Madame High Commissioner, Amnesty International welcomes the opportunity to engage in this dialogue with you on the basis of an advance copy of your rich and varied introductory remarks. We wish to speak to three elements in those remarks. We strongly support your call for the Special Procedure system to receive adequate resources to fulfil the increasingly numerous demands that the Council places on the system’s expertise. This is all the more important because mandate-holders offer their services pro bono and can already only devote limited time to the fulfilment of their global mandates. In addition to ensuring adequate resources for the system of Special Procedures, States active in this Council must also do better in taking account of the Special Procedures’ analysis in its decision-making. The Council must consider with the greatest seriousness the advice that it itself has sought. To better assist the Council to address crisis situations, it needs to devise credible, long- term, sustainable and well-resourced mechanisms for investigation, monitoring, advice and follow-up of specific situations that can draw on the expertise of the Special Procedures. These mechanisms would need to be complementary to the existing global thematic mandates. Madame High Commissioner, Amnesty International April 2009 Index: IOR 41/011/2009 UN Human Rights Council tenth session 7 Compilation of statements by Amnesty Interntaional Amnesty International welcomes the attention that you draw to the precarious situation of civilians affected by the armed conflict in northern Sri Lanka. Current news reports suggest that
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Right to Peace, Which Occurred on 19 December 2016 by a Majority of Its Member States
    In July 2016, the Human Rights Council (HRC) of the United Nations in Geneva recommended to the General Assembly (UNGA) to adopt a Declaration on the Right to Peace, which occurred on 19 December 2016 by a majority of its Member States. The Declaration on the Right to Peace invites all stakeholders to C. Guillermet D. Fernández M. Bosé guide themselves in their activities by recognizing the great importance of practicing tolerance, dialogue, cooperation and solidarity among all peoples and nations of the world as a means to promote peace. To reach this end, the Declaration states that present generations should ensure that both they and future generations learn to live together in peace with the highest aspiration of sparing future generations the scourge of war. Mr. Federico Mayor This book proposes the right to enjoy peace, human rights and development as a means to reinforce the linkage between the three main pillars of the United Nations. Since the right to life is massively violated in a context of war and armed conflict, the international community elaborated this fundamental right in the 2016 Declaration on the Right to Peace in connection to these latter notions in order to improve the conditions of life of humankind. Ambassador Christian Guillermet Fernandez - Dr. David The Right to Peace: Fernandez Puyana Past, Present and Future The Right to Peace: Past, Present and Future, demonstrates the advances in the debate of this topic, the challenges to delving deeper into some of its aspects, but also the great hopes of strengthening the path towards achieving Peace.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Rights Situation in the Philippines
    C 74 E/788 Official Journal of the European Union EN 20.3.2008 Thursday 26 April 2007 7. Condemns this and all other acts of violence and intimidation against the free exercise of journalism and freedom of expression; stresses that the safety of journalists must be treated as a priority by all those attached to an open and democratic society and to progress towards peace everywhere, in line with the unanimously agreed United Nations Security Council Resolution S/RES/1738 (2006) adopted on 23 Decem- ber 2006; 8. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the High Represen- tative for the CFSP, the governments and parliaments of the Member States, the President of the Palestinian National Authority, the Palestinian Legislative Council and the UN Secretary-General. P6_TA(2007)0171 Human rights situation in the Philippines European Parliament resolution of 26 April 2007 on the human rights situation in the Philippines The European Parliament, — having regard to the Report of the independent Commission to Address Media and Activist Killings, chaired by Justice Jose Melo (the Melo Commission), which was released on 22 February 2007, — having regard to the preliminary report by Philip Alston, UN Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, sum- mary or arbitrary executions, — having regard to the statement by the UN Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms while countering terrorism, Martin Scheinin, of 12 March 2007, — having regard to the pledges the Philippine
    [Show full text]
  • Center News/Faculty and Staff Updates
    Human Rights Brief Volume 17 | Issue 3 Article 13 2010 Center News/Faculty and Staff pU dates Human Rights Brief Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/hrbrief Part of the Legal Education Commons Recommended Citation Human Rights Brief. "Center News/Faculty and Staff pdU ates." Human Rights Brief 17, no.3 (2010): 72-74. This Column is brought to you for free and open access by the Washington College of Law Journals & Law Reviews at Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Human Rights Brief by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. : Center News/Faculty and Staff Updates CENTER NEWS/FACULTY AND STAFF UPDATES ceNter NeWs Immigration and Customs Enforcement, of conduct that constitute customary law; U.S. Department of Homeland Security). the place of legal dualism in a mod- centeR’s progRam On Human neha Misra (Solidarity Center, AFL- ern constitutional state; intersections of tRafficking anD fORceD laBOR CIO), Ann Jordan, (Program Director, customary law and gender, particularly HOsts cOnfeRence examining OBama Center’s Program on Human Trafficking with respect to land tenure rights; and the aDministRatiOn’s approacH tO and Forced Labor), and Bama Athreya inclusion of customary law in national cOmBating tRafficking anD fORceD (International Labor Rights Forum) served and regional courts. sanele sibanda, lec- laBOR as moderators. turer at the University of Witwatersrand in South Africa, delivered the keynote The Center for Human Rights and speech on whether modern conceptions Humanitarian Law’s Program on Human u.s.-isRael civil liBeRties laW of democracy and human rights provide a Trafficking and Forced Labor, along with fellows progRam celeBRates 25 role for customary law in advancing human the International Labor Rights Forum yeaRs; professOR HeRman scHWaRtz rights or enriching the constitutional state.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Regional Preparatory Conference for Africa
    UNITED NATIONS A A/CONF.211/PC.3/4 Distr: General General Assembly 3 September 2008 Original: English Durban Review Conference Preparatory Committee Second substantive session Geneva, 6–17 October 2008 Item 3 of the provisional agenda Reports of preparatory meetings and activities at the international, regional and national levels Report of the Regional Preparatory Meeting for Africa for the Durban Review Conference (Abuja, 24–26 August 2008) Vice-Chair/Rapporteur: Ms. Cissy Taliwaku (Uganda) K0841735 260909 A/CONF.211/PC.3/4 Contents I. Final document of the Regional Preparatory Meeting for Africa for the Durban Review Conference......................................................................................................................................3 A. Review of progress and assessment of implementation of the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action by all stakeholders at the national, regional and international levels, including the assessment of contemporary manifestations of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance............................................................5 B. Assessing, for the purpose of enhancing, the effectiveness of existing Durban Declaration and Programme of Action follow-up mechanisms and other United Nations mechanisms dealing with the issue of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance............................................................9 C. Promotion of the universal ratification and implementation of the International Convention on
    [Show full text]
  • General Assembly 26 March 2010
    United Nations A/RES/64/148 Distr.: General General Assembly 26 March 2010 Sixty-fourth session Agenda item 67 (b) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 18 December 2009 [on the report of the Third Committee (A/64/437)] 64/148. Global efforts for the total elimination of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance and the comprehensive implementation of and follow-up to the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action The General Assembly, Recalling its resolution 52/111 of 12 December 1997, in which it decided to convene the World Conference against Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia and Related Intolerance, and its resolutions 56/266 of 27 March 2002, 57/195 of 18 December 2002, 58/160 of 22 December 2003, 59/177 of 20 December 2004 and 60/144 of 16 December 2005, which guided the comprehensive follow-up to and effective implementation of the World Conference, and in this regard underlining the importance of their full and effective implementation, Welcoming the outcome of the Durban Review Conference convened in Geneva from 20 to 24 April 2009 within the framework of the General Assembly in accordance with its resolution 61/149 of 19 December 2006, Noting the approaching commemoration of the tenth anniversary of the 1 adoption of the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action,0F Recalling all of the relevant resolutions and decisions of the Commission on Human Rights and of the Human Rights Council on this subject, and calling for their implementation to ensure the successful implementation of the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action, 2 Noting Human Rights Council decision 3/103 of 8 December 2006,1F by which, heeding the decision and instruction of the World Conference, the Council established the Ad Hoc Committee of the Human Rights Council on the Elaboration of Complementary Standards, _______________ 1 See A/CONF.189/12 and Corr.1, chap.
    [Show full text]
  • Health Resilience Requires Rigorous Human Rights Assessment
    STG Resilience Papers Health Resilience Requires Rigorous Human Rights Assessment Martin Scheinin, British Academy Global Professor, University of Oxford, UK; Part-time Professor, European University Institute, Florence, Italy May 2021 Summary • Compliance with human rights is an important element of health resilience, generating popular legitimacy and trust, legality and legal certainty, and favourable effects for the economy. Crucially, it will save lives when societies will be confronted with new pandemics. • Comprehensive, structured and evidence-based assessment of national responses to pandemics for their conformity with human rights is possible. It requires a rigorous methodology. We have developed a model for COVID-19 (see, Chart 1) that can be verified and then adapted to future pandemics by defining those elements of the model that are constant and those that will need to be modified for a new epidemic. • A piloting exercise in respect of 17 countries and their performance during the second half of 2020 allows for a set of comparative observations (see, Table 1 for all grades and Table 2 for top-three and bottom-two countries). Most importantly, the pilot study supports the conclusion that strong human rights performance in respect of any category of human rights entails and requires general compliance across all categories of human rights. This conclusion reflects the principle of interdependence and indivisibility of all human rights. • A global study of the human rights compatibility of national strategies against COVID-19 in the course of 2021 should be commissioned, building on the expert assessment methodology applied in the pilot study. A clear objective should be included to produce a generalizable model that can be adapted to future pandemics, through a modular structure that allows for adaptation to the biological and epidemiological specificities of each pathogen and pandemic.
    [Show full text]
  • MINORITY DEATH MATCH Jews, Blacks, And
    September US Subs Cover Final2rev2 7/28/09 3:36 PM Page 1 SCENES FROM THE IRANIAN UPRISING HARPER’S MAGAZINE / SEPTEMBER 2009 $6.95 ◆ MINORITY DEATH MATCH Jews, Blacks, and the “Post-Racial” Presidency By Naomi Klein DEHUMANIZED When Math and Science Rule the School By Mark Slouka ADRIANA A story by J. M. Coetzee Also: Breyten Breytenbach and Richard Nixon ◆ REPORT MINORITY DEATH MATCH Jews, blacks, and the “post-racial” presidency By Naomi Klein When I arrived at the grand of- “Durban II,” this was the only United ing, why should they? And it could get fices of the United Nations High Nations gathering specifi cally focused worse, Pillay told me. “The E.U. states Commissioner for Human Rights, at on pushing governments to combat are meeting at 6:00 p.m. tonight, and the Palais Wilson, looking out at a racism inside their borders, a task that the Netherlands and Italy are likely to drizzly Lake Geneva, pull out.” She and U.N. Navanethem Pillay was Secretary-General Ban hunched over the Ki-moon had been on shoulder of her deputy, the phone with foreign Kyung-wha Kang, dic- ministers all day, trying tating a press release. “I to prevent the entire am shocked and deeply European Union from disappointed,” I heard walking out. Canada her say, pointing at the and Israel had pulled screen while Kang out months before. typed. It was 3:00 p.m., As Pillay was tally- and Pillay was having a ing up the damage, an very bad day. aide popped her head “Done,” she finally in the door: “The danc- declared, plopping down ers are here.” The high at her conference table.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents Chapter 6 HUMAN RIGHTS 142 A
    Table of Contents Chapter 6 HUMAN RIGHTS 142 A. GENERAL 142 1. Country Reports on Human Rights Practices 142 2. Periodic Report to the UN Committee on Human Rights Concerning the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights 142 3. Human Rights Council 143 a. Overview 143 b. U.S. Universal Periodic Review 144 c. Work of Special Representative: Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights 148 d. Actions regarding Libya 149 (1) Special Session 149 (2) Suspension of Libya from Membership 151 e. Actions regarding Syria 153 (1) Special Session on Syria in April (16th Special Session) 153 (2) Special Session on Syria in August (17th Special Session) 155 (3) First report of the Commission of Inquiry 157 (4) Special Session on Syria in December (18th Special Session) 158 B. DISCRIMINATION 159 1. Race 159 a. Overview 159 b. Durban follow-up and tenth anniversary commemorations 159 (1) Human Rights Council 159 (2) General Assembly 161 c. Other issues relating to protecting freedom expression while countering racism or intolerance 162 d. OAS Resolution on the Draft Inter-American Convention Against Racism 164 2. Gender 165 a. Women, Peace, and Security 165 (1) The United States National Action Plan on Women, Peace, and Security 165 (2) United Nations actions on women, peace, and security 172 b. Women’s health 174 c. Women and nationality 175 d. UN Commission on the Status of Women 176 3. Sexual Orientation 176 a. March Joint Statement at the Human Rights Council 177 b. June Human Rights Council Resolution 177 c. U.S. initiatives to protect the human rights of LGBT persons 179 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Efforts for the Total Elimination of Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia and Related Intolerance And
    United Nations A/69/354 General Assembly Distr.: General 26 August 2014 Original: English Sixty-ninth session Item 67 (b) of the provisional agenda* Elimination of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance: comprehensive implementation of and follow-up to the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action Global efforts for the total elimination of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance and the comprehensive implementation of and follow-up to the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action** Report of the Secretary-General Summary The present report is submitted pursuant to General Assembly resolution 68/151, in which the Assembly requested the Secretary-General to submit to it at its sixty-ninth session a report on the implementation of the resolution. The report was prepared by the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. It summarizes information received from stakeholders, and concludes with recommendations. * A/69/150. ** The present document was submitted late owing to the need to consult with partners. 14-59833 (E) 110914 *1459833* A/69/354 I. Introduction 1. In its resolution 68/151, the General Assembly acknowledged the efforts and initiatives undertaken by States to prohibit discrimination and segregation and to engender the full enjoyment of economic, social and cultural as well as civil and political rights. The Assembly emphasized that, despite efforts in that regard, millions of human beings continued to be victims of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia
    [Show full text]
  • Meld. St. 33 (2011–2012) Report to the Storting (White Paper)
    Meld. St. 33 (2011–2012) Report to the Storting (white paper) Published by: Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs Norway and the United Nations: Common Future, Internet address: www.government.no Common Solutions Cover design: Anna Maria Pirolt/Felix Media Printed by: 07 Aurskog AS 03/2013 ER JØM KE IL T M 2 4 9 1 7 3 Trykksak Cover photo: Row 1: 1. Giacomo Pirozzi/ UNICEF, 2. Guri Dahl/ tinagent.com, 3. Victoria Hazou/ UN Photo, 4. Albert Gonzales Farran/ UN Photo, 5. Ministry of Foreign Affairs Row 3: 1. Johan Wildhagen/ Innovation Norway, 2. John Isaac/ UN Photo Row 4: 1. Bernadino Soares/ UN Poto, 2. Eskinder Debebe/ UN Photo Row 5: 1. Ministry of Foreign Affairs Row 6: 1. Jacob Silberberg/Panos Pictures /Felix Features, 2. UN Photo/Joao Araujo Row 7: 1. Sigrun Agøy Engum/ Norway UN, 2. Marco Dormino/ UN Photo Meld. St. 33 (2011–2012) Report to the Storting (white paper) Norway and the United Nations: Common Future, Common Solutions Contents Summary ......................................................... 5 3 The international legal order, human rights and gender 1 Vision and values ....................... 10 equality .......................................... 41 1.1 Norway and the United Nations .. 10 3.1 The international legal order ........ 41 1.1.1 Norway’s UN policy in a 3.1.1 The normative role of the UN ...... 41 changing world .............................. 10 3.1.2 Compliance with international 1.1.2 A well-equipped toolbox: the UN’s law .................................................... 42 many roles and functions .............. 11 3.1.3 The UN and the Law of the Sea .... 43 1.1.3 The shifting balance of power – 3.2 Human rights .................................
    [Show full text]
  • Human Rights Information Bulletin, No. 75 Council of Europe
    Human ISSN 1608-9618 H/Inf (2009) 1 Rights Information Bulletin No. 75, July-October 2008 Building a Europe for and with Children – Towards a strategy for 2009-2011 9-10 October 2008, Strasbourg 10 October 2008: European Day 8-10 September 2008, Stockholm Conference “Enhancing the impact of against the Death Penalty. This Day is A Seminar was organised on the the Framework Convention: past held on 10 October of each year. As theme “Towards European guidelines experience, present achievements and from October 2008, it is organised on child-friendly justice” in the future challenges” celebrating the 10th jointly with the European Union. framework of the Conference anniversary of the Framework “Building a Europe for and with Convention for the protection of Children – Towards a strategy for national minorities. 2009-2011”. Human rights information bulletin No. 75, July-October 2008 The Human rights information bulletin is published three times a year This issue published January 2009. Date of next issue: April 2009. ISSN: by the Directorate General of Human Rights and Legal Affairs, Council 1608-9618 (print edition) and 1608-7372 (electronic edition). Internet of Europe, F-67075 Strasbourg Cedex. address: http://www.coe.int/justice/. Contents Treaties and conventions Signatures and ratifications . 4 European Court of Human Rights Grand Chamber judgments . 5 I. v. Finland, 11 Cuc Pascu v. Romania, 19 Yumak and Sadak v. Turkey, 5 The Georgian Labour Party v. Georgia, 11 Bogumil v. Portugal, 19 Korbely v. Hungary, 7 Vladimir Romanov v. Russia, 13 Moiseyev v. Russia, 20 Kovačić and Others v. Slovenia, 8 Liberty & Other Organisations v.
    [Show full text]
  • A/HRC/16/51 General Assembly
    United Nations A/HRC/16/51 General Assembly Distr.: General 22 December 2010 Original: English Human Rights Council Sixteenth session Agenda item 3 Promotion and protection of all human rights, civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights, including the right to development Report of the Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms while countering terrorism, Martin Scheinin Ten areas of best practices in countering terrorism Summary The present document is the sixth and last annual report submitted to the Human Rights Council and its predecessor, the Commission on Human Rights, by the current Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms while countering terrorism. In chapter II of the report, the Special Rapporteur lists his key activities from 1 August to 10 December 2010. In the main report, contained in chapter III, he presents a compilation of best practice in countering terrorism. The compilation is the outcome of an analysis undertaken by the Special Rapporteur on the basis of his work conducted over almost six years and involving various forms of interaction with multiple stakeholders. In particular, he has taken into account the written submissions received from Governments by 30 November 2010. The full submissions are reproduced in an addendum (A/HRC/16/51/Add.4). The outcome of the process is the identification of 10 areas of best practice. A best practice is distilled from existing and emerging practices in a broad range of States throughout the world. The compilation also draws upon international treaties, resolutions adopted by international organizations and the jurisprudence of international and regional courts.
    [Show full text]