Assessing ‘Good Governance’ and Corruption in New Zealand: ‘Scientific’ Measurement, Political Discourse, and Historical Narrative Robert Gregory Working Paper No: 13/03 Year 2013 1 INSTITUTE FOR GOVERNANCE AND POLICY STUDIES WORKING PAPER 13/03 MONTH/YEAR October 2013 AUTHOR Robert Gregory Victoria University of Wellington ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The author thanks Jonathan Boston and Michael Macaulay, of the School of Government, Victoria University of Wellington, for helpful comments on two drafts of this paper. INSTITUTE FOR GOVERNANCE School of Government AND POLICY STUDIES Victoria University of Wellington PO Box 600 Wellington NEW ZEALAND For any queries relating to this working paper please contact:
[email protected] The views, opinions, findings, and conclusions or DISCLAIMER recommendations expressed in this paper are strictly those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect the views of the Institute for Governance and Policy Studies, the School of Government or Victoria University of Wellington. 2 Assessing ‘Good Governance’ and Corruption in New Zealand: ‘Scientific’ Measurement, Political Discourse, and Historical Narrative Robert Gregory Emeritus Professor of Political Science School of Government Victoria University of Wellington New Zealand Abstract New Zealand is ranked highly on the Worldwide Governance Indicators (WGI), which assess performance on six dimensions of governance: voice and accountability, political stability and absence of violence, government effectiveness, regulatory quality, rule of law, and control of corruption. In addition, New Zealand has long been rated by Transparency International‘s Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI) as having the very lowest rates of corruption. It was rated as first, or first equal (that is, perceived as the least corrupt or equally least corrupt country in the world), in 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009 and 2010, and sat alone atop the rankings in 2009 and 2011.