DOCSLIB.ORG

Draft Environmental Impact Statement, Minidoka Dam Spillway

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Draft Environmental Impact Statement, Minidoka Dam Spillway Draft Environmental Impact Statement Minidoka Dam Spillway Replacement Minidoka Project, Idaho U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Pacific Northwest Region Snake River Area Office Boise, Idaho December 2009 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR The mission of the Department of the Interior is to protect and provide access to our Nation’s natural and cultural heritage and honor our trust responsibilities to Indian tribes and our commitments to island communities. MISSION OF THE BUREAU OF RECLAMATION The mission of the Bureau of Reclamation is to manage, develop, and protect water and related resources in an environmentally and economically sound manner in the interest of the American public. Draft Environmental Impact Statement Minidoka Dam Spillway Replacement Minidoka Project, Idaho U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Pacific Northwest Region Snake River Area Office Boise, Idaho December 2009 Draft Environmental Impact Statement Minidoka Dam Spillway Replacement Minidoka County, Idaho Lead Agency: For further information contact: U.S. Department of the Interior Allyn Meuleman Bureau of Reclamation Snake River Area Office Pacific Northwest Region 230 Collins Road Boise, ID 83702-4520 (208) 383-2258 Cooperating Agency: U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Idaho Fish and Wildlife Office Abstract: This Draft Environmental Impact Statement (Draft EIS) examines alternatives to correcting structural problems at the Minidoka Dam Spillway and associated facilities on Lake Walcott, Idaho. Alternatives considered in the Draft EIS are the No Action, as required under the National Environmental Policy Act; total replacement of the spillway and headgate structures; and replacement of just the spillway. Total replacement of the spillway and headgate structures is the preferred alternative. In addition, the Draft EIS identifies special use areas to be designated under each of the action alternatives that would open areas currently closed for public use. Certain public activities became restricted per 43 CFR Part 423 Public Conduct on Bureau of Reclamation Facilities, Lands, and Waterbodies which became effective on October 1, 2008. Designation of special use areas would again allow historic uses which are appropriate for this area, but are not currently allowed under the new rules and regulations. This Draft EIS was prepared in compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act. It also provides the public review required under Executive Orders 11988 (Floodplain Management) and 11990 (Protection of Wetlands) and the National Historic Preservation Act. Results of compliance per Secretarial Order 3175 (Indian Trust Resources), Executive Order 13007 (Sacred Sites), the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act and the Endangered Species Act of 1973 are included in the evaluations contained in this Draft EIS/ Comments are due to the Bureau of Reclamation at the address indicated above by February 5, 2010. Filing Number: DES 09-56 Page intentionally left blank. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Page intentionally left blank. Managing Water in the West Minidoka Dam Spillway Replacement l Cana de Si Project Area th or N in a M LAKE WALCOTT μ (! Acequia Reclamation Lands Minidoka Dam Lake Walcott State Park al Minidoka National BCan Wildlife Refuge ?° ACanal Can a l Cities ide th S B2 Canal ai n Sou M Interstate Highway Roads 00.50.25 11.52 Miles Neither the authors, Reclamation, or any other party involved in preparing the material and data displayed here warrant or represent that the information is in every Rupert respect complete and accurate, and are not held responsible for errors or omissions. Filename: MDSR_ForEIS_1007083.mxd Drawn by: G. Young/J. Jones Date: Aug. 7, 2009 W A S H I N G ±? T O N MONTANA IDAHO W Y O M Area of Detail I O R Boise Idaho N Falls E ^_ !( G !"`$ G American !( MountainHome Falls Pocatello O _!"$ !( Rupert !( N Burley !( !"^$ !( !"_$ TwinFalls !( !( Milner _!"$ !"_$ NEVADA UTAH EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Proposed Action The Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) is proposing to correct structural problems at the Minidoka Dam spillway and canal headworks on Lake Walcott, Idaho. The existing spillway and canal headworks are showing considerable signs of degradation. In addition to correcting the structural problems of the existing spillway and canal headworks, Reclamation is also proposing to designate Special Use Areas at the project site in accordance with 43 CFR Part 423 Regulations, Public Conduct on Bureau of Reclamation Facilities, Lands, and Waterbodies. These Special Use Areas will define what public uses are allowed in close proximity to the dam, spillway, and other facilities. Purpose and Need for Action The purpose of the Proposed Action is to prevent structural failure of the Minidoka Dam spillway and canal headworks (proposed action area). After 103 years of continued use, the 2,237-foot-long concrete spillway has reached the end of its functional lifespan. The concrete that forms the spillway crest and stoplog structure piers have suffered extensive deterioration at numerous locations. Additionally, previous ice damage to the overflow section of the spillway requires that the reservoir water levels be dropped each winter. The headworks at the North Side Canal and South Side Canal also show serious concrete deterioration similar to the spillway conditions. The current conditions of the Minidoka Dam spillway and headworks present increasingly difficult reliability and maintenance problems. Reclamation must be able to continue to meet its contractual obligations for water delivery, power generation, and commitments to provide flow augmentation water under the Nez Perce Settlement Agreement and the Endangered Species Act (ESA). A partial or complete failure of the spillway or canal headworks could threaten Reclamation’s ability to meet those obligations. According to 43 CFR Part 423 Regulations, Public Conduct Rules on Bureau of Reclamation Facilities, Lands, and Waterbodies, certain public activities are restricted on Reclamation lands, facilities, and waterbodies. Specifically, Subpart C, Section 423.36 Swimming, states in part that, (a) You may swim, wade, snorkel, scuba dive, raft, or tube at your own risk in Reclamation waters, except: December 2009 – Minidoka Dam Spillway Replacement Draft EIS Summary S 1 Alternatives (1) Within 300 yards of dams, powerplants, pumping plants, spillways, stilling basins, gates, intake structures, and outlet works. In addition, Section 423.37 Winter Activities, states in part that, (b) You must not ice skate, ice fish, or ice sail within 300 yards of dams, powerplants, pumping plants, spillways, stilling basins, gates, intake structures, or outlet works. Reclamation is proposing to designate Special Use Areas at the project site in accordance with 43 CFR Part 423 Regulations, Public Conduct on Bureau of Reclamation Facilities, Lands, and Waterbodies. The 43 CFR Part 423 rules and regulations restrict certain historic recreational uses on the Reclamation lands, facilities, and waterbodies associated with the proposed action area. In order to allow historic recreational uses to continue, Reclamation has determined that it would be in the best public interest to provide modifications to the rules. Reclamation will restrict uses which affect public safety. Alternatives To address the deterioration and potential structural failure of the spillway and associated structures, Reclamation began an alternative formulation process in March of 2000 with the preparation of an appraisal-level design that analyzed two different options for buttressing the existing spillway crest and providing new gated spillway sections. Since 2000, Reclamation has evaluated several technical conceptual designs and options to address spillway replacement. Much of the early effort was devoted to identifying specific engineering elements and combinations that would meet this objective. A Value Planning Study was completed in January 2002 that considered 15 options for spillway replacement. Three options were eliminated due to feasibility or cost; twelve options were considered feasible and carried forward for further study. In 2003, an Appraisal Study was completed that investigated the two most favorable options from the 2002 Value Planning Study. The two options studied were: (1) complete replacement of the spillway with a new concrete overflow section and a set of 12 new radial gates; and (2) complete replacement of the spillway with a combination of overflow sections and rubber dam sections. Both options were considered feasible with Option 1 being considered as the most cost-effective solution. A Realignment Study was completed in 2006 that considered three different alignments for the spillway. The goal of this study was to shorten the overall length of the spillway; thereby, reducing costs. Summary S 2 December 2009 – Minidoka Dam Spillway Replacement Draft EIS Alternatives A Value Engineering Study, completed in June 2008, resulted in 16 different options or combination of options being considered. The study team included staff and experts from Reclamation as well as representatives from the irrigation districts. Fourteen options were determined to have merit and were carried forward for further analysis. In 2009, a Feasibility Study, including alternative selection was completed. The study investigated five different alternatives and three different alignments incorporating feasibility-level cost estimates (Attachment A - Figure ES-1). This study determined that
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Minidoka Powerplant Unit 7 Structure Maintenance and Rehabilitation Minidoka County, Idaho
    Finding of No Significant Impact Final Environmental Assessment Minidoka Powerplant Unit 7 Structure Maintenance and Rehabilitation Minidoka County, Idaho U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Pacific Northwest Region Snake River Area Office PN FONSI # 18-11 Introduction The Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) has prepared this Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) to comply with the Council of Environmental Quality (CEQ) regulations for implementing procedural provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). This document briefly describes the proposed action, other alternatives considered, the scoping process, Reclamation’s consultation and coordination activities, mitigation and Reclamation’s finding. The Final Environmental Assessment (EA) fully documents the analyses of the potential environmental effects of implementing the changes proposed. Location and Background The Minidoka Project, one of the earliest federal Reclamation projects in Idaho, comprises multiple facilities including Minidoka Dam, the reservoir it impounds (Lake Walcott), and Minidoka Powerplant. The Minidoka Project serves lands north and south of the Snake River. Minidoka Dam and Lake Walcott are located in south-central Idaho on the Snake River Plain, north of the junction of Interstate 84/86, east of the town of Rupert, Idaho. Minidoka Dam supplies irrigation water, provides irrigation water storage, and generates power via Minidoka Powerplant that is delivered to the Bonneville Power Administration for marketing (Hess et al. 2002). The original Minidoka Powerplant (Units 1 through 5), completed in 1910, had a total generation capacity of 7.5 megawatts. To meet increased power production needs of the Minidoka Project, as well as to keep pace with the growing market for power in nearby towns, Minidoka Powerplant’s Unit 6 was installed in 1927, and Unit 7 was installed in 1942.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Registration Form
    NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 10024-0018 (Oct. 1990) United States Department of the Interior ,C£$ PftRKSERVIC National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Pla Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If an item does not ap property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcatei instructins. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1. Name of Property historic name: American Falls Reservoir Flooded Townsite other name/site number: 2. Location street & number American Falls Reservoir [ ] not for publication city or town American Falls ______ [ X ] vicinity state: Idaho code: ID county: Power code: 077 zip code: 83211 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this [X] nomination [ ] request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36
    [Show full text]
  • Snake River Flow Augmentation Impact Analysis Appendix
    SNAKE RIVER FLOW AUGMENTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS APPENDIX Prepared for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Walla Walla District’s Lower Snake River Juvenile Salmon Migration Feasibility Study and Environmental Impact Statement United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Pacific Northwest Region Boise, Idaho February 1999 Acronyms and Abbreviations (Includes some common acronyms and abbreviations that may not appear in this document) 1427i A scenario in this analysis that provides up to 1,427,000 acre-feet of flow augmentation with large drawdown of Reclamation reservoirs. 1427r A scenario in this analysis that provides up to 1,427,000 acre-feet of flow augmentation with reservoir elevations maintained near current levels. BA Biological assessment BEA Bureau of Economic Analysis (U.S. Department of Commerce) BETTER Box Exchange Transport Temperature Ecology Reservoir (a water quality model) BIA Bureau of Indian Affairs BID Burley Irrigation District BIOP Biological opinion BLM Bureau of Land Management B.P. Before present BPA Bonneville Power Administration CES Conservation Extension Service cfs Cubic feet per second Corps U.S. Army Corps of Engineers CRFMP Columbia River Fish Mitigation Program CRP Conservation Reserve Program CVPIA Central Valley Project Improvement Act CWA Clean Water Act DO Dissolved Oxygen Acronyms and Abbreviations (Includes some common acronyms and abbreviations that may not appear in this document) DREW Drawdown Regional Economic Workgroup DDT Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane EIS Environmental Impact Statement EP Effective Precipitation EPA Environmental Protection Agency ESA Endangered Species Act ETAW Evapotranspiration of Applied Water FCRPS Federal Columbia River Power System FERC Federal Energy Regulatory Commission FIRE Finance, investment, and real estate HCNRA Hells Canyon National Recreation Area HUC Hydrologic unit code I.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Twin Falls Visitor Center
    SOUTH CENTRAL IDAHO A PERFECT LOCATION FOR THE ADVENTURINGADVENTURING SPIRIT | OFFICIAL IDAHO STATE TRAVEL GUIDE TRAVEL | OFFICIAL STATE IDAHO 54 Snake River Early settlers found the Snake River Plain a bit too dry for their taste, so they set about building a dam and irrigation canals along the Snake River. These structures so dramatically changed the landscape—turning arid, cracked soil into fertile agricultural fields—that the area became known as the “Magic Valley.” Everywhere you look, you’ll see evidence of the earth’s forces at work: deep canyons, high bluffs, unusual rock formations, and even lava flows. Sure, this area is a geologist’s dream, but its terrain also delivers big fun for the adventurer in you. The Snake River is at the heart of the valley’s recreation, inviting you to swim, raft, speedboat, and paddle its waters, and BASE jump and zip-line into its stunning canyon. The river’s reservoirs are pristine destinations for camping, hunting, and fishing—and are home to an abundance of big game and other wildlife. Throughout the region, see springs surge from within cliff walls and thundering waterfalls crash and churn into canyons. Wander through lava tubes, discover world-famous fossil beds, and eat homemade ice cream. Take a relaxing drive through Hagerman’s peaceful country- side and make your way to City of Rocks National Reserve, where granite columns and spires stand guard over a 500-acre windswept valley. Follow Visit Idaho on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, YouTube and other social media channels. VISITIDAHO.ORG | 55 #VisitIdaho SOUTH CENTRAL IDAHO ‹ ADVENTURES AS DRAMATIC AS THE LANDSCAPE HAGERMAN VALLEY ducer of steelhead and rainbow trout.
    [Show full text]
  • Bureau of :Reclama\.Ion
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT . OF THE IBTERIOR . GEOLOGICAL SUR'V'EY WATER :RESOURCES DIVISION GROUND WA'l;'ER :BRANCH PBELIMI:B'ARY ImPORT O!l GBOUID WATER IN THE :SOliABZA LAD AliEAv. POWEll .A:RD !LAINE COUNTIES, IDAHO B7 Harold Meisler Open-file r~rt. SnbJect to revision. Preparecl for the 11. s. :Bureau of :Reclama\.ion Boise, I4abo August 1958 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER RESOURCES D!VI SION GROUND WATER BRANCH PRBILIMINARY :REPORT ON GROUID WATER IN THE :BONANZA L.AXE AREA 9 POWER ADD l3LAINE COUNTIES~ IDAHO ~ »y Harold Meisler OF 58-G7 9pen-file r~ort$ Snbject to revision. Prepared for the Uo S. !ureau of Bselamation Boise, Idaho August 1958 '· ·-. CONTENTS P~e Abstract . .. " . l Introduction . " .. • • 0 2 Purpose and scope of report . 2 Location and extent of area . 3 Methods of investigation . 3 Well-numbering s,ystem 5 ~ • 0 6 Geographic setting . o- "-• «> •~•• Geologie formations and their water-bearing Qba.racteristics g Ground water • . • • • • • 0 • . 13 Occurrence and sources • • 0 • • • . 13' 14 Direction of ground-water movement . ~ " Ground-water discharge • • " . • . • q • 14 Relation betw,een the regional water tabl·e and the Snake Riv .er • . • • • . • • • • • .. 10· • .. • • .. • • 16 Conclusions . Logs of wells and core holes . .. 21 References . • • • • • • .. • • . 28 ILLUSTRATION'S Plate 1 . Map of the :Bonanza Lake area showing well locations and water-table contour • • .. • • • • • • • • • ., Pocket Figure 1 • . Index map of southern I d.aho showillg area cover.ed , by this r .eport • • • • • . • . • • • • • • • • • 4 ILLUSTRATIONs--Continued Page Figure 4. Schematic diagram Showing possible relation of . ,_ ,· ground water to Snake River in area from American Falls Reservoir to Lake Walcott • • • 20 TABLES Table 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Fisheries Losses in the Upper Snake River Basin in Idaho Attributable to Construction and Operation of Dams with Federal Hydropower Facilities
    ASSESSMENT OF FISHERIES LOSSES IN THE UPPER SNAKE RIVER BASIN IN IDAHO ATTRIBUTABLE TO CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF DAMS WITH FEDERAL HYDROPOWER FACILITIES Idaho Department of Fish and Game IDFG Report Number 07-52 August 2007 ASSESSMENT OF FISHERIES LOSSES IN THE UPPER SNAKE RIVER BASIN IN IDAHO ATTRIBUTABLE TO CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF DAMS WITH FEDERAL HYDROPOWER FACILITIES Prepared by: Idaho Department of Fish and Game 600 South Walnut Street P.O. Box 25 Boise, ID 83707 IDFG Report Number 07-52 August 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ASSESSMENT OF FISHERIES LOSSES IN THE UPPER SNAKE RIVER BASIN IN IDAHO ATTRIBUTABLE TO CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF DAMS WITH FEDERAL HYDROPOWER FACILITIES................................................................................ 1 ABSTRACT................................................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 2 BACKGROUND AND DESCRIPTION OF STUDY AREAS.......................................................... 2 Anderson Ranch Dam and Reservoir ........................................................................................ 2 Black Canyon Dam and Reservoir............................................................................................. 3 Deadwood Dam and Reservoir.................................................................................................. 4 Boise River Diversion
    [Show full text]
  • Minidoka Project Reservoirs Store Flow of the Snake Snake the of Flow Store Reservoirs Project Minidoka Many Benefits Benefits Many
    September 2010 2010 September 0461 0461 - 678 (208) Office Field Snake Upper www.usbr.gov/pn the American public. public. American the economically sound manner in the interest of of interest the in manner sound economically related resources in an environmentally and and environmentally an in resources related develop, and protect water and and water protect and develop, clamation is to manage, manage, to is clamation Re of The mission of the Bureau Bureau the of mission The Recreation: over 674,000 visits - $25 million million $25 - visits 674,000 over Recreation: Flood damage prevented: $8.8 million million $8.8 prevented: damage Flood Power generated: $5.6 million million $5.6 generated: Power Livestock industry: $342 million million $342 industry: Livestock IDAHO–WYOMING IDAHO–WYOMING Irrigated crops: $622 million million $622 crops: Irrigated What’s the Yearly Value? Value? Yearly the What’s Project Project the West. West. the Minidoka Minidoka some of the best outdoor recreation opportunities in in opportunities recreation outdoor best the of some also provides fish and wildlife enhancement and and enhancement wildlife and fish provides also The Story of the the of Story The production, and to reduce flood damage. The project project The damage. flood reduce to and production, River system for later irrigation use, electricity electricity use, irrigation later for system River Minidoka Project reservoirs store flow of the Snake Snake the of flow store reservoirs Project Minidoka Many Benefits Benefits Many Congress passed the Reclamation Act in 1902 to storing project water. The 1911 permanent dam was Railroad Draws Settlers bring water to the arid West.
    [Show full text]
  • American Falls Reservoir Is the Largest Reservoir of the Project
    Finding of No Significant Impact Final Environmental Assessment Maintenance and Rehabilitation of Spillway and Dam Structures at American Falls Dam, Minidoka Project, Power County, Idaho U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Pacific Northwest Region Snake River Area Office PN FONSI # 19-4 Introduction The Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) has prepared this Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) to comply with the Council of Environmental Quality (CEQ) regulations for implementing procedural provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). This document briefly describes the proposed action, other alternatives considered, the scoping process, Reclamation’s consultation and coordination activities, mitigation, and Reclamation’s finding. The Final Environmental Assessment (EA) fully documents the analyses of the potential environmental effects of implementing the changes proposed. Location and Background The Minidoka Project (Project) was authorized by the Secretary of the Interior in 1904 and was the first Reclamation project constructed in Idaho. It is located in the Snake River Basin in the southeastern part of the state. American Falls Dam, completed in 1927, is a 94-foot-high composite concrete and earth gravity-type dam on river mile 714.7 of the Snake River near American Falls, Idaho. With a storage capacity of 1,700,000 acre-feet, American Falls Reservoir is the largest reservoir of the Project. The dam itself is located in Power County, Idaho, but the reservoir stretches northeast into both Bingham and Bannock Counties. American Falls Dam and Reservoir comprise a multi-purpose facility from which principle benefits include irrigation, power generation (through a powerplant owned and operated by Idaho Power), flood control, fish and wildlife resources, and recreation.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Seepage and Discharge Uncertainty in the Middle Snake River, Southwestern Idaho
    Prepared in cooperation with the State of Idaho, Idaho Power Company, and the Idaho Department of Water Resources Evaluation of Seepage and Discharge Uncertainty in the Middle Snake River, Southwestern Idaho Scientific Investigations Report 2014–5091 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover: Streamgage operated by Idaho Power Company on the Snake River below Swan Falls Dam near Murphy, Idaho (13172500), looking downstream. Photograph taken by Molly Wood, U.S. Geological Survey, March 15, 2010. Evaluation of Seepage and Discharge Uncertainty in the Middle Snake River, Southwestern Idaho By Molly S. Wood, Marshall L. Williams, David M. Evetts, and Peter J. Vidmar Prepared in cooperation with the State of Idaho, Idaho Power Company, and the Idaho Department of Water Resources Scientific-Investigations Report 2014–5091 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior SALLY JEWELL, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Suzette M. Kimball, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2014 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this information product, for the most part, is in the public domain, it also may contain copyrighted materials as noted in the text.
    [Show full text]
  • (E.1-2) Geomorphology of the Hells Canyon Reach of the Snake River
    Geomorphology of the Hells Canyon Reach of the Snake River Steve Miller, CH2M HILL Dick Glanzman, CH2M HILL Sherrill Doran, CH2M HILL Shaun Parkinson, Idaho Power Company John Buffington, University of Idaho and Jim Milligan, University of Idaho (Ret.) Technical Report Appendix E.1-2 May 2002 Revised July 2003 Hells Canyon Complex FERC No. 1971 Copyright © 2003 by Idaho Power Company Idaho Power Company Geomorphology of the Snake River Basin and Hells Canyon CONTENTS Chapter Page Definitions...................................................................................................................................... xi Acronyms.................................................................................................................................... xvii Executive Summary.....................................................................................................................C-1 Preface..........................................................................................................................................C-5 1. Introduction and Geologic and Geomorphic History............................................................... 1-1 1.1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 1-2 1.2. Current Physiographic Description .................................................................................. 1-3 1.3. Pre-Quaternary Geologic History....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Modified Flows 2020, Upper Snake River Basin
    Technical Memorandum Modified Flows 2020, Upper Snake River Basin Columbia Pacific Northwest Region U.S. Department of the Interior October 2020 Mission Statements The Department of the Interior conserves and manages the Nation’s natural resources and cultural heritage for the benefit and enjoyment of the American people, provides scientific and other information about natural resources and natural hazards to address societal challenges and create opportunities for the American people, and honors the Nation’s trust responsibilities or special commitments to American Indians, Alaska Natives, and affiliated island communities to help them prosper. The mission of the Bureau of Reclamation is to manage, develop, and protect water and related resources in an environmentally and economically sound manner in the interest of the American public. Table of Contents Acronyms and Abbreviations ........................................................................................... iii 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................. 1 1.1. Reclamation Modified Flows Process .........................................................................................1 1.2. Differences from Modified Flows 2010 .....................................................................................2 2. Unregulated Flow Dataset Development.................................................................. 4 2.1. Unregulated Flows Methodology.................................................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • Ground-Water Possibilities South of the Snake River Between Twin Falls and Pocatello, Idaho
    Ground-Water Possibilities South of the Snake River Between Twin Falls and Pocatello, Idaho By E. G. CROSTHWAITE CONTRIBUTIONS TO HYDROLOGY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1460-C Prepared for the United States Bureau of Reclamation with the cooperation of the Idaho Department of Reclamation UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1957 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR FRED A. SEATON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D. C. CONTENTS Pag* Abstract _______________________ ...- _ . _____ - _ 99> Introduction-.... _________________________________________ _____ 100 Purpose and scope of report __ _________________________________ 100 Location of area_________________________________________ _ ____ 101 Previous investigations_____________________ ____________________ 102 Geography __ ___________________________________________________ 103' Surface features___-__-____-________--__-________-__--__-___- _ 108- Drainage. ___-___-__-__---_---_-__-_---______--_---_-____ __ _ 100 Climate.. ____________________ . ______________ 107 Precipitation _ ______________________________ _ _ __ ___ 107 Temperature _ ____________________________________ __ _ _ 109* Evaporation __ ___________________________________ _ ___ _ 110' Development ___ ____________________________________ _ _____ 111 Population __ _____________________________________ ___ __ 111 Agriculture. ___ __ _______________________________ _ _____ 113: Industry
    [Show full text]